STORMWATER MANAGEMENT

DESIGN CALCULATIONS

345 Oak Street

Assessors Map F15-38
Pembroke, Massachusetts

Prepared for

Champion Builders Inc.

P.O. Box #1414
Duxbury, MA 02331

May 30, 2019

Revised:
August 21, 2019
September 20, 2019
 Table of Contents

Table of Contents 2
Summary 3
Peak Rate Summary 3

Overall Site Analysis Section I 4

HydroCad Report 5-88

Stormwater Compliance Section II 89

Standards 1-10 90-94
Stormwater Checklist 95-102

Operation and Maintenance Plan Section III 103

During Construction 104-105
Post Construction 106-107
MassDEP Deep Sump Catch Basin O&M Guide 108-111
Contech CDS O&M Guide 112-119

NRCS Custom Soils Report 120-135

Soil Logs Attached

ADS Technical Note: Pipe Floatation Attached
Pipe Buoyancy Hand Calculations Attached
Site Plan & Tributary Area Plans Pre & Post Attached
SUMMARY
The project is the redevelopment of an existing building at 345 Oak Street, Pembroke. The new
development will include the construction of a 2,400 square foot office building with 33 parking
spaces, and a 1,560 square foot garage.

Stormwater on site is managed through the use of 7 –225’ long x 36” diameter polyethylene pipes that
fully store the 2, 10, and 25 year storm flow and slowly release the water into the nearby drop inlet.
High groundwater and poor soils restrict the feasibility of onsite infiltration of stormwater, however an
infiltration basin is proposed provide recharge for new impervious area. A 1” diameter orifice at the
bottom of the weir placed inside of the proposed outlet structure controls the flow, with a 6” diameter
orifice acting as the emergency overflow. Calculations show peak flow rates post construction to be
lower for the 2, 10, 25, and 100 year storms.

This analysis was prepared to demonstrate Compliance with the Massachusetts Stormwater
Management Regulations and the Town of Pembroke Rules and Regulations for Stormwater
Management.

This analysis is divided into the following sections:

Section I Overall Site Analysis

Section II Compliance with Massachusetts Storm water Management Regulations
Section III Operation And Maintenance Plan

The calculations have been performed for the 2, 10, 25, 100-year 24 hour storm event, using the
HydroCAD computer program. This computer program is based upon the Soils Conservation Service
(SCS) TR-20 and TR-55 computer models and uses the SCS Curvilinear Unit rainfall distribution.

Peak Rate Summary

The following summary details a reduction in Peak Rate runoff. Values are in cubic feet per second.

2 YEAR 10 YEAR 25 YEAR 100 YEAR

PRE POST PRE POST PRE POST PRE POST
CB1 0.22 0.22 0.38 0.37 0.50 0.47 0.68 0.64
CB2 0.04 0.02 0.07 0.03 0.09 0.04 0.13 0.06
STREET 1.66 0.32 2.71 0.54 3.46 0.69 4.62 0.93
TOTAL 1.91 0.52 3.14 0.86 4.02 1.11 5.39 1.50
 Section I
Overall Site Analysis
 10P
1S 4S
3S Basin
5S
Post-CB1 Post-Roof
Post-1
Post-2

2P
8R 2S
6S Pipe Storage
1P
ADS Pipe 0S Post-CB2
Pre-CB1
CB1
Post-Street
7S

Pre-Street 0P

Post-Total

8S
6P
Pre-CB2
Pre-Total

Subcat Reach Pond Link Routing Diagram for 345 Oak Drainage
Prepared by Grady Consulting, LLC, Printed 9/20/2019
HydroCAD® 10.00-21 s/n 09955 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC
345 Oak Drainage
Prepared by Grady Consulting, LLC Printed 9/20/2019
HydroCAD® 10.00-21 s/n 09955 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 2

Area Listing (all nodes)

Area CN Description
(sq-ft) (subcatchment-numbers)
58,152 79 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG C (0S, 1S, 2S, 3S, 4S, 5S, 6S, 7S, 8S)
24,001 98 Paved parking, HSG C (0S, 3S, 5S, 7S)
2,546 98 Roofs, HSG C (3S, 7S)
1,643 98 Unconnected pavement, HSG C (3S, 5S, 7S)
2,400 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG C (4S)
88,742 86 TOTAL AREA
345 Oak Drainage
Prepared by Grady Consulting, LLC Printed 9/20/2019
HydroCAD® 10.00-21 s/n 09955 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 3

Soil Listing (all nodes)

Area Soil Subcatchment

(sq-ft) Group Numbers
0 HSG A
0 HSG B
88,742 HSG C 0S, 1S, 2S, 3S, 4S, 5S, 6S, 7S, 8S
0 HSG D
0 Other
88,742 TOTAL AREA
345 Oak Drainage
Prepared by Grady Consulting, LLC Printed 9/20/2019
HydroCAD® 10.00-21 s/n 09955 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 4

Ground Covers (all nodes)

HSG-A HSG-B HSG-C HSG-D Other Total Ground Sub

(sq-ft) (sq-ft) (sq-ft) (sq-ft) (sq-ft) (sq-ft) Cover Num
0 0 58,152 0 0 58,152 50-75% Grass
cover, Fair
0 0 24,001 0 0 24,001 Paved parking
0 0 2,546 0 0 2,546 Roofs
0 0 1,643 0 0 1,643 Unconnected
pavement
0 0 2,400 0 0 2,400 Unconnected
roofs
0 0 88,742 0 0 88,742 TOTAL AREA
345 Oak Drainage Type III 24-hr 2-Year Rainfall=3.40"
Prepared by Grady Consulting, LLC Printed 9/20/2019
HydroCAD® 10.00-21 s/n 09955 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 5

Time span=0.00-36.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 3601 points

Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN
Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method

Subcatchment 0S: Post-Street Runoff Area=6,350 sf 14.90% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.70"

Flow Length=64' Slope=0.1000 '/' Tc=2.9 min CN=82 Runoff=0.32 cfs 900 cf

Subcatchment 1S: Post-CB1 Runoff Area=5,213 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.49"

Flow Length=165' Tc=7.5 min CN=79 Runoff=0.20 cfs 647 cf

Subcatchment 2S: Post-CB2 Runoff Area=420 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.49"

Flow Length=20' Slope=0.1000 '/' Tc=1.3 min CN=79 Runoff=0.02 cfs 52 cf

Subcatchment 3S: Post-1 Runoff Area=18,392 sf 67.08% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.54"

Flow Length=171' Tc=3.7 min CN=92 Runoff=1.33 cfs 3,895 cf

Subcatchment 4S: Post-Roof Runoff Area=4,400 sf 54.55% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.26"

Flow Length=35' Tc=0.2 min CN=89 Runoff=0.32 cfs 830 cf

Subcatchment 5S: Post-2 Runoff Area=9,597 sf 66.35% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.54"

Flow Length=160' Slope=0.0200 '/' Tc=5.1 min CN=92 Runoff=0.66 cfs 2,032 cf

Subcatchment 6S: Pre-CB1 Runoff Area=6,022 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.49"

Flow Length=197' Tc=8.3 min CN=79 Runoff=0.22 cfs 747 cf

Subcatchment 7S: Pre-Street Runoff Area=37,415 sf 22.82% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.77"

Flow Length=263' Slope=0.0250 '/' Tc=8.1 min CN=83 Runoff=1.66 cfs 5,534 cf

Subcatchment 8S: Pre-CB2 Runoff Area=933 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.49"

Flow Length=28' Slope=0.0250 '/' Tc=3.1 min CN=79 Runoff=0.04 cfs 116 cf

Reach 8R: ADS Pipe Avg. Flow Depth=0.05' Max Vel=2.72 fps Inflow=0.03 cfs 2,561 cf
8.0" Round Pipe n=0.012 L=27.0' S=0.0519 '/' Capacity=2.98 cfs Outflow=0.03 cfs 2,560 cf

Pond 0P: Post-Total Inflow=0.52 cfs 4,159 cf

Primary=0.52 cfs 4,159 cf

Pond 1P: CB1 Inflow=0.22 cfs 3,207 cf

Primary=0.22 cfs 3,207 cf

Pond 2P: Pipe Storage Peak Elev=86.26' Storage=4,628 cf Inflow=1.97 cfs 5,927 cf
Outflow=0.03 cfs 2,561 cf

Pond 6P: Pre-Total Inflow=1.91 cfs 6,396 cf

Primary=1.91 cfs 6,396 cf

Pond 10P: Basin Peak Elev=97.42' Storage=507 cf Inflow=0.32 cfs 830 cf

Discarded=0.01 cfs 758 cf Primary=0.00 cfs 0 cf Outflow=0.01 cfs 758 cf

Total Runoff Area = 88,742 sf Runoff Volume = 14,752 cf Average Runoff Depth = 1.99"
65.53% Pervious = 58,152 sf 34.47% Impervious = 30,590 sf
345 Oak Drainage Type III 24-hr 2-Year Rainfall=3.40"
Prepared by Grady Consulting, LLC Printed 9/20/2019
HydroCAD® 10.00-21 s/n 09955 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 6

Summary for Subcatchment 0S: Post-Street

Runoff = 0.32 cfs @ 12.05 hrs, Volume= 900 cf, Depth= 1.70"

Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-36.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Type III 24-hr 2-Year Rainfall=3.40"

Area (sf) CN Description

0 98 Roofs, HSG C
946 98 Paved parking, HSG C
0 98 Unconnected pavement, HSG C
5,404 79 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG C
0 73 Woods, Fair, HSG C
6,350 82 Weighted Average
5,404 85.10% Pervious Area
946 14.90% Impervious Area

Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description

(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
2.8 50 0.1000 0.30 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 3.60"
0.1 14 0.1000 2.21 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Short Grass Pasture Kv= 7.0 fps
2.9 64 Total

Subcatchment 0S: Post-Street

Hydrograph

0.36 Runoff
0.34 0.32 cfs
0.32 Type III 24-hr
0.3
2-Year Rainfall=3.40"
0.28
0.26
Runoff Area=6,350 sf
0.24 Runoff Volume=900 cf
0.22 Runoff Depth=1.70"
Flow (cfs)

0.2
Flow Length=64'
0.18
0.16 Slope=0.1000 '/'
0.14 Tc=2.9 min
0.12
CN=82
0.1
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.02
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
Time (hours)
345 Oak Drainage Type III 24-hr 2-Year Rainfall=3.40"
Prepared by Grady Consulting, LLC Printed 9/20/2019
HydroCAD® 10.00-21 s/n 09955 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 7

Summary for Subcatchment 1S: Post-CB1

Runoff = 0.20 cfs @ 12.11 hrs, Volume= 647 cf, Depth= 1.49"

Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-36.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Type III 24-hr 2-Year Rainfall=3.40"

Area (sf) CN Description

0 98 Roofs, HSG C
0 98 Paved parking, HSG C
0 98 Unconnected pavement, HSG C
5,213 79 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG C
0 73 Woods, Fair, HSG C
5,213 79 Weighted Average
5,213 100.00% Pervious Area

Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description

(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
6.5 50 0.0120 0.13 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 3.60"
1.0 115 0.0750 1.92 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Short Grass Pasture Kv= 7.0 fps
7.5 165 Total

Subcatchment 1S: Post-CB1

Hydrograph

Runoff
0.21
0.20 cfs
0.2
0.19 Type III 24-hr
0.18 2-Year Rainfall=3.40"
0.17
0.16 Runoff Area=5,213 sf
0.15
Runoff Volume=647 cf
0.14
0.13 Runoff Depth=1.49"
Flow (cfs)

0.12
0.11
Flow Length=165'
0.1 Tc=7.5 min
0.09
0.08
CN=79
0.07
0.06
0.05
0.04
0.03
0.02
0.01
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
Time (hours)
345 Oak Drainage Type III 24-hr 2-Year Rainfall=3.40"
Prepared by Grady Consulting, LLC Printed 9/20/2019
HydroCAD® 10.00-21 s/n 09955 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 8

Summary for Subcatchment 2S: Post-CB2

Runoff = 0.02 cfs @ 12.02 hrs, Volume= 52 cf, Depth= 1.49"

Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-36.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Type III 24-hr 2-Year Rainfall=3.40"

Area (sf) CN Description

0 98 Roofs, HSG C
0 98 Paved parking, HSG C
0 98 Unconnected pavement, HSG C
420 79 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG C
0 73 Woods, Fair, HSG C
420 79 Weighted Average
420 100.00% Pervious Area

Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description

(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
1.3 20 0.1000 0.25 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 3.60"

Subcatchment 2S: Post-CB2

Hydrograph

0.022 Runoff
0.021 0.02 cfs
0.02
0.019 Type III 24-hr
0.018 2-Year Rainfall=3.40"
0.017
0.016 Runoff Area=420 sf
0.015
0.014 Runoff Volume=52 cf
0.013
Runoff Depth=1.49"
Flow (cfs)

0.012
0.011 Flow Length=20'
0.01
0.009 Slope=0.1000 '/'
0.008
0.007
Tc=1.3 min
0.006 CN=79
0.005
0.004
0.003
0.002
0.001
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
Time (hours)
345 Oak Drainage Type III 24-hr 2-Year Rainfall=3.40"
Prepared by Grady Consulting, LLC Printed 9/20/2019
HydroCAD® 10.00-21 s/n 09955 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 9

Summary for Subcatchment 3S: Post-1

Runoff = 1.33 cfs @ 12.05 hrs, Volume= 3,895 cf, Depth= 2.54"

Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-36.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Type III 24-hr 2-Year Rainfall=3.40"

Area (sf) CN Description

1,560 98 Roofs, HSG C
9,716 98 Paved parking, HSG C
1,062 98 Unconnected pavement, HSG C
6,054 79 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG C
0 73 Woods, Fair, HSG C
18,392 92 Weighted Average
6,054 32.92% Pervious Area
12,338 67.08% Impervious Area
1,062 8.61% Unconnected

Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description

(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
2.7 41 0.0730 0.25 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 3.60"
0.3 15 0.0200 1.00 Sheet Flow,
Smooth surfaces n= 0.011 P2= 3.60"
0.7 115 0.0200 2.87 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Paved Kv= 20.3 fps
3.7 171 Total
345 Oak Drainage Type III 24-hr 2-Year Rainfall=3.40"
Prepared by Grady Consulting, LLC Printed 9/20/2019
HydroCAD® 10.00-21 s/n 09955 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 10

Subcatchment 3S: Post-1

Hydrograph

Runoff
1.33 cfs
Type III 24-hr
2-Year Rainfall=3.40"
Runoff Area=18,392 sf
1 Runoff Volume=3,895 cf
Runoff Depth=2.54"
Flow (cfs)

Flow Length=171'
Tc=3.7 min
CN=92

0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
Time (hours)
345 Oak Drainage Type III 24-hr 2-Year Rainfall=3.40"
Prepared by Grady Consulting, LLC Printed 9/20/2019
HydroCAD® 10.00-21 s/n 09955 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 11

Summary for Subcatchment 4S: Post-Roof

[49] Hint: Tc<2dt may require smaller dt

Runoff = 0.32 cfs @ 12.00 hrs, Volume= 830 cf, Depth= 2.26"

Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-36.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Type III 24-hr 2-Year Rainfall=3.40"

Area (sf) CN Description

2,400 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG C
2,000 79 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG C
4,400 89 Weighted Average
2,000 45.45% Pervious Area
2,400 54.55% Impervious Area
2,400 100.00% Unconnected

Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description

(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
0.1 20 0.3000 3.12 Sheet Flow,
Smooth surfaces n= 0.011 P2= 3.60"
0.1 15 0.0200 2.12 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Grassed Waterway Kv= 15.0 fps
0.2 35 Total

Subcatchment 4S: Post-Roof

Hydrograph

0.36 Runoff
0.34 0.32 cfs
0.32 Type III 24-hr
0.3
2-Year Rainfall=3.40"
0.28
0.26
Runoff Area=4,400 sf
0.24 Runoff Volume=830 cf
0.22 Runoff Depth=2.26"
Flow (cfs)

0.2
Flow Length=35'
0.18
0.16 Tc=0.2 min
0.14 CN=89
0.12
0.1
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.02
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
Time (hours)
345 Oak Drainage Type III 24-hr 2-Year Rainfall=3.40"
Prepared by Grady Consulting, LLC Printed 9/20/2019
HydroCAD® 10.00-21 s/n 09955 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 12

Summary for Subcatchment 5S: Post-2

Runoff = 0.66 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 2,032 cf, Depth= 2.54"

Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-36.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Type III 24-hr 2-Year Rainfall=3.40"

Area (sf) CN Description

0 98 Roofs, HSG C
5,951 98 Paved parking, HSG C
417 98 Unconnected pavement, HSG C
3,229 79 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG C
0 73 Woods, Fair, HSG C
9,597 92 Weighted Average
3,229 33.65% Pervious Area
6,368 66.35% Impervious Area
417 6.55% Unconnected

Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description

(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
4.4 40 0.0200 0.15 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 3.60"
0.7 120 0.0200 2.87 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Paved Kv= 20.3 fps
5.1 160 Total

Subcatchment 5S: Post-2

Hydrograph

Runoff
0.7 0.66 cfs
0.65 Type III 24-hr
0.6 2-Year Rainfall=3.40"
0.55 Runoff Area=9,597 sf
0.5 Runoff Volume=2,032 cf
0.45 Runoff Depth=2.54"
Flow (cfs)

0.4 Flow Length=160'

0.35 Slope=0.0200 '/'
0.3 Tc=5.1 min
0.25 CN=92
0.2

0.15

0.1

0.05

0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
Time (hours)
345 Oak Drainage Type III 24-hr 2-Year Rainfall=3.40"
Prepared by Grady Consulting, LLC Printed 9/20/2019
HydroCAD® 10.00-21 s/n 09955 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 13

Summary for Subcatchment 6S: Pre-CB1

Runoff = 0.22 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 747 cf, Depth= 1.49"

Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-36.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Type III 24-hr 2-Year Rainfall=3.40"

Area (sf) CN Description

0 98 Roofs, HSG C
0 98 Paved parking, HSG C
0 98 Unconnected pavement, HSG C
0 96 Gravel surface, HSG C
6,022 79 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG C
0 73 Woods, Fair, HSG C
6,022 79 Weighted Average
6,022 100.00% Pervious Area

Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description

(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
6.1 50 0.1000 0.14 Sheet Flow,
Woods: Light underbrush n= 0.400 P2= 3.60"
2.2 147 0.0500 1.12 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Woodland Kv= 5.0 fps
8.3 197 Total

Subcatchment 6S: Pre-CB1

Hydrograph

0.24 Runoff
0.23 0.22 cfs
0.22
0.21
Type III 24-hr
0.2 2-Year Rainfall=3.40"
0.19
0.18 Runoff Area=6,022 sf
0.17
0.16
Runoff Volume=747 cf
0.15
0.14
Runoff Depth=1.49"
Flow (cfs)

0.13 Flow Length=197'

0.12
0.11 Tc=8.3 min
0.1
0.09
CN=79
0.08
0.07
0.06
0.05
0.04
0.03
0.02
0.01
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
Time (hours)
345 Oak Drainage Type III 24-hr 2-Year Rainfall=3.40"
Prepared by Grady Consulting, LLC Printed 9/20/2019
HydroCAD® 10.00-21 s/n 09955 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 14

Summary for Subcatchment 7S: Pre-Street

Runoff = 1.66 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 5,534 cf, Depth= 1.77"

Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-36.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Type III 24-hr 2-Year Rainfall=3.40"

Area (sf) CN Description

986 98 Roofs, HSG C
7,388 98 Paved parking, HSG C
164 98 Unconnected pavement, HSG C
0 96 Gravel surface, HSG C
28,877 79 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG C
0 73 Woods, Fair, HSG C
37,415 83 Weighted Average
28,877 77.18% Pervious Area
8,538 22.82% Impervious Area
164 1.92% Unconnected

Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description

(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
4.9 50 0.0250 0.17 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 3.60"
3.2 213 0.0250 1.11 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Short Grass Pasture Kv= 7.0 fps
8.1 263 Total

Subcatchment 7S: Pre-Street

Hydrograph

Runoff
1.66 cfs
Type III 24-hr
2-Year Rainfall=3.40"
Runoff Area=37,415 sf
Runoff Volume=5,534 cf
Runoff Depth=1.77"
Flow (cfs)

1 Flow Length=263'
Slope=0.0250 '/'
Tc=8.1 min
CN=83

0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
Time (hours)
345 Oak Drainage Type III 24-hr 2-Year Rainfall=3.40"
Prepared by Grady Consulting, LLC Printed 9/20/2019
HydroCAD® 10.00-21 s/n 09955 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 15

Summary for Subcatchment 8S: Pre-CB2

Runoff = 0.04 cfs @ 12.05 hrs, Volume= 116 cf, Depth= 1.49"

Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-36.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Type III 24-hr 2-Year Rainfall=3.40"

Area (sf) CN Description

0 98 Roofs, HSG C
0 98 Paved parking, HSG C
0 98 Unconnected pavement, HSG C
0 96 Gravel surface, HSG C
933 79 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG C
0 73 Woods, Fair, HSG C
933 79 Weighted Average
933 100.00% Pervious Area

Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description

(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
3.1 28 0.0250 0.15 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 3.60"

Subcatchment 8S: Pre-CB2

Hydrograph
0.046
Runoff
0.044
0.04 cfs
0.042
0.04 Type III 24-hr
0.038
0.036
2-Year Rainfall=3.40"
0.034 Runoff Area=933 sf
0.032
0.03 Runoff Volume=116 cf
0.028 Runoff Depth=1.49"
Flow (cfs)

0.026
0.024 Flow Length=28'
0.022
0.02
Slope=0.0250 '/'
0.018 Tc=3.1 min
0.016
0.014 CN=79
0.012
0.01
0.008
0.006
0.004
0.002
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
Time (hours)
345 Oak Drainage Type III 24-hr 2-Year Rainfall=3.40"
Prepared by Grady Consulting, LLC Printed 9/20/2019
HydroCAD® 10.00-21 s/n 09955 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 16

Summary for Reach 8R: ADS Pipe

[52] Hint: Inlet/Outlet conditions not evaluated

[79] Warning: Submerged Pond 2P Primary device # 1 by 0.05'

Inflow Area = 32,389 sf, 65.16% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 0.95" for 2-Year event
Inflow = 0.03 cfs @ 19.50 hrs, Volume= 2,561 cf
Outflow = 0.03 cfs @ 19.51 hrs, Volume= 2,560 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.3 min

Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 0.00-36.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Max. Velocity= 2.72 fps, Min. Travel Time= 0.2 min
Avg. Velocity = 2.44 fps, Avg. Travel Time= 0.2 min

Peak Storage= 0 cf @ 19.51 hrs

Average Depth at Peak Storage= 0.05'
Bank-Full Depth= 0.67' Flow Area= 0.3 sf, Capacity= 2.98 cfs

8.0" Round Pipe

n= 0.012 Corrugated PP, smooth interior
Length= 27.0' Slope= 0.0519 '/'
Inlet Invert= 85.00', Outlet Invert= 83.60'
345 Oak Drainage Type III 24-hr 2-Year Rainfall=3.40"
Prepared by Grady Consulting, LLC Printed 9/20/2019
HydroCAD® 10.00-21 s/n 09955 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 17

Reach 8R: ADS Pipe

Hydrograph

Inflow
0.032 0.03 cfs Outflow
0.03 Inflow Area=32,389 sf 0.03 cfs
0.028 Avg. Flow Depth=0.05'
0.026
Max Vel=2.72 fps
0.024
8.0"
0.022
Round Pipe
0.02
n=0.012
Flow (cfs)

0.018
0.016 L=27.0'
0.014 S=0.0519 '/'
0.012 Capacity=2.98 cfs
0.01
0.008
0.006
0.004
0.002
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
Time (hours)
345 Oak Drainage Type III 24-hr 2-Year Rainfall=3.40"
Prepared by Grady Consulting, LLC Printed 9/20/2019
HydroCAD® 10.00-21 s/n 09955 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 18

Summary for Pond 0P: Post-Total

[40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow)

Inflow Area = 44,372 sf, 49.70% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 1.12" for 2-Year event
Inflow = 0.52 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 4,159 cf
Primary = 0.52 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 4,159 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min

Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-36.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs

Pond 0P: Post-Total

Hydrograph

Inflow
0.52 cfs Primary
0.55 0.52 cfs Inflow Area=44,372 sf
0.5

0.45

0.4

0.35
Flow (cfs)

0.3

0.25

0.2

0.15

0.1

0.05

0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
Time (hours)
345 Oak Drainage Type III 24-hr 2-Year Rainfall=3.40"
Prepared by Grady Consulting, LLC Printed 9/20/2019
HydroCAD® 10.00-21 s/n 09955 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 19

Summary for Pond 1P: CB1

[40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow)

Inflow Area = 37,602 sf, 56.13% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 1.02" for 2-Year event
Inflow = 0.22 cfs @ 12.11 hrs, Volume= 3,207 cf
Primary = 0.22 cfs @ 12.11 hrs, Volume= 3,207 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min

Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-36.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs

Pond 1P: CB1

Hydrograph

Inflow
0.24 0.22 cfs Primary
0.23 0.22 cfs Inflow Area=37,602 sf
0.22
0.21
0.2
0.19
0.18
0.17
0.16
0.15
0.14
Flow (cfs)

0.13
0.12
0.11
0.1
0.09
0.08
0.07
0.06
0.05
0.04
0.03
0.02
0.01
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
Time (hours)
345 Oak Drainage Type III 24-hr 2-Year Rainfall=3.40"
Prepared by Grady Consulting, LLC Printed 9/20/2019
HydroCAD® 10.00-21 s/n 09955 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 20

Summary for Pond 2P: Pipe Storage

Inflow Area = 32,389 sf, 65.16% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.20" for 2-Year event
Inflow = 1.97 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 5,927 cf
Outflow = 0.03 cfs @ 19.50 hrs, Volume= 2,561 cf, Atten= 99%, Lag= 446.7 min
Primary = 0.03 cfs @ 19.50 hrs, Volume= 2,561 cf

Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-36.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs / 3
Peak Elev= 86.26' @ 19.50 hrs Surf.Area= 4,814 sf Storage= 4,628 cf

Plug-Flow detention time= 706.9 min calculated for 2,560 cf (43% of inflow)
Center-of-Mass det. time= 586.7 min ( 1,380.6 - 793.9 )

Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description

#1 85.00' 11,133 cf 36.0" Round RCP_Round 36" x 7
L= 225.0'
#2 85.00' 250 cf 5.00'W x 10.00'L x 5.00'H Tank Housing
#3 85.00' 250 cf 5.00'W x 10.00'L x 5.00'H Tank Housing
#4 85.00' 250 cf 5.00'W x 10.00'L x 5.00'H Tank Housing
11,883 cf Total Available Storage

Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices

#1 Primary 85.00' 1.0" Vert. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600
#2 Primary 87.50' 6.0" Vert. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600

Primary OutFlow Max=0.03 cfs @ 19.50 hrs HW=86.26' (Free Discharge)

1=Orifice/Grate (Orifice Controls 0.03 cfs @ 5.32 fps)
2=Orifice/Grate ( Controls 0.00 cfs)
345 Oak Drainage Type III 24-hr 2-Year Rainfall=3.40"
Prepared by Grady Consulting, LLC Printed 9/20/2019
HydroCAD® 10.00-21 s/n 09955 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 21

Pond 2P: Pipe Storage

Hydrograph

Inflow
1.97 cfs Primary

2 Inflow Area=32,389 sf
Peak Elev=86.26'
Storage=4,628 cf
Flow (cfs)

0.03 cfs
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
Time (hours)
345 Oak Drainage Type III 24-hr 2-Year Rainfall=3.40"
Prepared by Grady Consulting, LLC Printed 9/20/2019
HydroCAD® 10.00-21 s/n 09955 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 22

Summary for Pond 6P: Pre-Total

[40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow)

Inflow Area = 44,370 sf, 19.24% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.73" for 2-Year event
Inflow = 1.91 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 6,396 cf
Primary = 1.91 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 6,396 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min

Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-36.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs

Pond 6P: Pre-Total

Hydrograph

Inflow
1.91 cfs Primary
2 1.91 cfs Inflow Area=44,370 sf
Flow (cfs)

0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
Time (hours)
345 Oak Drainage Type III 24-hr 2-Year Rainfall=3.40"
Prepared by Grady Consulting, LLC Printed 9/20/2019
HydroCAD® 10.00-21 s/n 09955 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 23

Summary for Pond 10P: Basin

Inflow Area = 4,400 sf, 54.55% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.26" for 2-Year event
Inflow = 0.32 cfs @ 12.00 hrs, Volume= 830 cf
Outflow = 0.01 cfs @ 15.96 hrs, Volume= 758 cf, Atten= 97%, Lag= 237.3 min
Discarded = 0.01 cfs @ 15.96 hrs, Volume= 758 cf
Primary = 0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0 cf

Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-36.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Peak Elev= 97.42' @ 15.96 hrs Surf.Area= 1,329 sf Storage= 507 cf

Plug-Flow detention time= 582.8 min calculated for 758 cf (91% of inflow)
Center-of-Mass det. time= 539.1 min ( 1,342.5 - 803.3 )

Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description

#1 97.00' 1,373 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic)Listed below (Recalc)

Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store

(feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet)
97.00 1,111 0 0
98.00 1,635 1,373 1,373

Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices

#1 Discarded 97.00' 0.270 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area
#2 Primary 97.60' 8.0" Horiz. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600
Limited to weir flow at low heads

Discarded OutFlow Max=0.01 cfs @ 15.96 hrs HW=97.42' (Free Discharge)

1=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.01 cfs)

Primary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 0.00 hrs HW=97.00' (Free Discharge)

2=Orifice/Grate ( Controls 0.00 cfs)
345 Oak Drainage Type III 24-hr 2-Year Rainfall=3.40"
Prepared by Grady Consulting, LLC Printed 9/20/2019
HydroCAD® 10.00-21 s/n 09955 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 24

Pond 10P: Basin

Hydrograph

Inflow
0.32 cfs Outflow

0.36
Inflow Area=4,400 sf Discarded
Primary
0.34 Peak Elev=97.42'
0.32
0.3
Storage=507 cf
0.28
0.26
0.24
0.22
Flow (cfs)

0.2
0.18
0.16
0.14
0.12
0.1
0.08
0.06 0.01 cfs
0.04 0.01 cfs
0.00
0.02 cfs
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
Time (hours)
345 Oak Drainage Type III 24-hr 10-Year Rainfall=4.70"
Prepared by Grady Consulting, LLC Printed 9/20/2019
HydroCAD® 10.00-21 s/n 09955 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 25

Time span=0.00-36.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 3601 points

Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN
Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method

Subcatchment 0S: Post-Street Runoff Area=6,350 sf 14.90% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.81"

Flow Length=64' Slope=0.1000 '/' Tc=2.9 min CN=82 Runoff=0.54 cfs 1,488 cf

Subcatchment 1S: Post-CB1 Runoff Area=5,213 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.55"

Flow Length=165' Tc=7.5 min CN=79 Runoff=0.34 cfs 1,106 cf

Subcatchment 2S: Post-CB2 Runoff Area=420 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.55"

Flow Length=20' Slope=0.1000 '/' Tc=1.3 min CN=79 Runoff=0.03 cfs 89 cf

Subcatchment 3S: Post-1 Runoff Area=18,392 sf 67.08% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.80"

Flow Length=171' Tc=3.7 min CN=92 Runoff=1.95 cfs 5,819 cf

Subcatchment 4S: Post-Roof Runoff Area=4,400 sf 54.55% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.49"

Flow Length=35' Tc=0.2 min CN=89 Runoff=0.49 cfs 1,278 cf

Subcatchment 5S: Post-2 Runoff Area=9,597 sf 66.35% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.80"

Flow Length=160' Slope=0.0200 '/' Tc=5.1 min CN=92 Runoff=0.96 cfs 3,036 cf

Subcatchment 6S: Pre-CB1 Runoff Area=6,022 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.55"

Flow Length=197' Tc=8.3 min CN=79 Runoff=0.38 cfs 1,277 cf

Subcatchment 7S: Pre-Street Runoff Area=37,415 sf 22.82% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.90"

Flow Length=263' Slope=0.0250 '/' Tc=8.1 min CN=83 Runoff=2.71 cfs 9,054 cf

Subcatchment 8S: Pre-CB2 Runoff Area=933 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.55"

Flow Length=28' Slope=0.0250 '/' Tc=3.1 min CN=79 Runoff=0.07 cfs 198 cf

Reach 8R: ADS Pipe Avg. Flow Depth=0.05' Max Vel=2.88 fps Inflow=0.03 cfs 3,149 cf
8.0" Round Pipe n=0.012 L=27.0' S=0.0519 '/' Capacity=2.98 cfs Outflow=0.03 cfs 3,148 cf

Pond 0P: Post-Total Inflow=0.86 cfs 5,831 cf

Primary=0.86 cfs 5,831 cf

Pond 1P: CB1 Inflow=0.37 cfs 4,254 cf

Primary=0.37 cfs 4,254 cf

Pond 2P: Pipe Storage Peak Elev=86.81' Storage=7,287 cf Inflow=2.89 cfs 8,955 cf
Outflow=0.03 cfs 3,149 cf

Pond 6P: Pre-Total Inflow=3.14 cfs 10,530 cf

Primary=3.14 cfs 10,530 cf

Pond 10P: Basin Peak Elev=97.61' Storage=781 cf Inflow=0.49 cfs 1,278 cf

Discarded=0.01 cfs 850 cf Primary=0.01 cfs 100 cf Outflow=0.02 cfs 949 cf

Total Runoff Area = 88,742 sf Runoff Volume = 23,346 cf Average Runoff Depth = 3.16"
65.53% Pervious = 58,152 sf 34.47% Impervious = 30,590 sf
345 Oak Drainage Type III 24-hr 10-Year Rainfall=4.70"
Prepared by Grady Consulting, LLC Printed 9/20/2019
HydroCAD® 10.00-21 s/n 09955 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 26

Summary for Subcatchment 0S: Post-Street

Runoff = 0.54 cfs @ 12.04 hrs, Volume= 1,488 cf, Depth= 2.81"

Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-36.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Type III 24-hr 10-Year Rainfall=4.70"

Area (sf) CN Description

0 98 Roofs, HSG C
946 98 Paved parking, HSG C
0 98 Unconnected pavement, HSG C
5,404 79 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG C
0 73 Woods, Fair, HSG C
6,350 82 Weighted Average
5,404 85.10% Pervious Area
946 14.90% Impervious Area

Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description

(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
2.8 50 0.1000 0.30 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 3.60"
0.1 14 0.1000 2.21 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Short Grass Pasture Kv= 7.0 fps
2.9 64 Total

Subcatchment 0S: Post-Street

Hydrograph

0.6
Runoff

0.55
0.54 cfs
Type III 24-hr
0.5
10-Year Rainfall=4.70"
0.45 Runoff Area=6,350 sf
0.4 Runoff Volume=1,488 cf
Runoff Depth=2.81"
0.35
Flow (cfs)

Flow Length=64'
0.3
Slope=0.1000 '/'
0.25 Tc=2.9 min
0.2 CN=82
0.15

0.1

0.05

0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
Time (hours)
345 Oak Drainage Type III 24-hr 10-Year Rainfall=4.70"
Prepared by Grady Consulting, LLC Printed 9/20/2019
HydroCAD® 10.00-21 s/n 09955 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 27

Summary for Subcatchment 1S: Post-CB1

Runoff = 0.34 cfs @ 12.11 hrs, Volume= 1,106 cf, Depth= 2.55"

Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-36.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Type III 24-hr 10-Year Rainfall=4.70"

Area (sf) CN Description

0 98 Roofs, HSG C
0 98 Paved parking, HSG C
0 98 Unconnected pavement, HSG C
5,213 79 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG C
0 73 Woods, Fair, HSG C
5,213 79 Weighted Average
5,213 100.00% Pervious Area

Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description

(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
6.5 50 0.0120 0.13 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 3.60"
1.0 115 0.0750 1.92 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Short Grass Pasture Kv= 7.0 fps
7.5 165 Total

Subcatchment 1S: Post-CB1

Hydrograph

Runoff
0.36 0.34 cfs
0.34 Type III 24-hr
0.32
0.3
10-Year Rainfall=4.70"
0.28 Runoff Area=5,213 sf
0.26 Runoff Volume=1,106 cf
0.24
Runoff Depth=2.55"
0.22
Flow (cfs)

0.2 Flow Length=165'

0.18 Tc=7.5 min
0.16 CN=79
0.14
0.12
0.1
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.02
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
Time (hours)
345 Oak Drainage Type III 24-hr 10-Year Rainfall=4.70"
Prepared by Grady Consulting, LLC Printed 9/20/2019
HydroCAD® 10.00-21 s/n 09955 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 28

Summary for Subcatchment 2S: Post-CB2

Runoff = 0.03 cfs @ 12.02 hrs, Volume= 89 cf, Depth= 2.55"

Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-36.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Type III 24-hr 10-Year Rainfall=4.70"

Area (sf) CN Description

0 98 Roofs, HSG C
0 98 Paved parking, HSG C
0 98 Unconnected pavement, HSG C
420 79 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG C
0 73 Woods, Fair, HSG C
420 79 Weighted Average
420 100.00% Pervious Area

Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description

(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
1.3 20 0.1000 0.25 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 3.60"

Subcatchment 2S: Post-CB2

Hydrograph

0.038 Runoff
0.036 0.03 cfs
0.034 Type III 24-hr
0.032
0.03
10-Year Rainfall=4.70"
0.028 Runoff Area=420 sf
0.026 Runoff Volume=89 cf
0.024
0.022
Runoff Depth=2.55"
Flow (cfs)

0.02 Flow Length=20'

0.018
Slope=0.1000 '/'
0.016
0.014
Tc=1.3 min
0.012 CN=79
0.01
0.008
0.006
0.004
0.002
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
Time (hours)
345 Oak Drainage Type III 24-hr 10-Year Rainfall=4.70"
Prepared by Grady Consulting, LLC Printed 9/20/2019
HydroCAD® 10.00-21 s/n 09955 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 29

Summary for Subcatchment 3S: Post-1

Runoff = 1.95 cfs @ 12.05 hrs, Volume= 5,819 cf, Depth= 3.80"

Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-36.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Type III 24-hr 10-Year Rainfall=4.70"

Area (sf) CN Description

1,560 98 Roofs, HSG C
9,716 98 Paved parking, HSG C
1,062 98 Unconnected pavement, HSG C
6,054 79 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG C
0 73 Woods, Fair, HSG C
18,392 92 Weighted Average
6,054 32.92% Pervious Area
12,338 67.08% Impervious Area
1,062 8.61% Unconnected

Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description

(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
2.7 41 0.0730 0.25 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 3.60"
0.3 15 0.0200 1.00 Sheet Flow,
Smooth surfaces n= 0.011 P2= 3.60"
0.7 115 0.0200 2.87 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Paved Kv= 20.3 fps
3.7 171 Total
345 Oak Drainage Type III 24-hr 10-Year Rainfall=4.70"
Prepared by Grady Consulting, LLC Printed 9/20/2019
HydroCAD® 10.00-21 s/n 09955 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 30

Subcatchment 3S: Post-1

Hydrograph

Runoff
2
1.95 cfs
Type III 24-hr
10-Year Rainfall=4.70"
Runoff Area=18,392 sf
Runoff Volume=5,819 cf
Runoff Depth=3.80"
Flow (cfs)

Flow Length=171'
1 Tc=3.7 min
CN=92

0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
Time (hours)
345 Oak Drainage Type III 24-hr 10-Year Rainfall=4.70"
Prepared by Grady Consulting, LLC Printed 9/20/2019
HydroCAD® 10.00-21 s/n 09955 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 31

Summary for Subcatchment 4S: Post-Roof

[49] Hint: Tc<2dt may require smaller dt

Runoff = 0.49 cfs @ 12.00 hrs, Volume= 1,278 cf, Depth= 3.49"

Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-36.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Type III 24-hr 10-Year Rainfall=4.70"

Area (sf) CN Description

2,400 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG C
2,000 79 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG C
4,400 89 Weighted Average
2,000 45.45% Pervious Area
2,400 54.55% Impervious Area
2,400 100.00% Unconnected

Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description

(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
0.1 20 0.3000 3.12 Sheet Flow,
Smooth surfaces n= 0.011 P2= 3.60"
0.1 15 0.0200 2.12 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Grassed Waterway Kv= 15.0 fps
0.2 35 Total

Subcatchment 4S: Post-Roof

Hydrograph

Runoff
0.49 cfs
0.5
Type III 24-hr
0.45 10-Year Rainfall=4.70"
0.4 Runoff Area=4,400 sf
Runoff Volume=1,278 cf
0.35
Runoff Depth=3.49"
Flow (cfs)

0.3 Flow Length=35'

0.25
Tc=0.2 min
CN=89
0.2

0.15

0.1

0.05

0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
Time (hours)
345 Oak Drainage Type III 24-hr 10-Year Rainfall=4.70"
Prepared by Grady Consulting, LLC Printed 9/20/2019
HydroCAD® 10.00-21 s/n 09955 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 32

Summary for Subcatchment 5S: Post-2

Runoff = 0.96 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 3,036 cf, Depth= 3.80"

Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-36.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Type III 24-hr 10-Year Rainfall=4.70"

Area (sf) CN Description

0 98 Roofs, HSG C
5,951 98 Paved parking, HSG C
417 98 Unconnected pavement, HSG C
3,229 79 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG C
0 73 Woods, Fair, HSG C
9,597 92 Weighted Average
3,229 33.65% Pervious Area
6,368 66.35% Impervious Area
417 6.55% Unconnected

Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description

(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
4.4 40 0.0200 0.15 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 3.60"
0.7 120 0.0200 2.87 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Paved Kv= 20.3 fps
5.1 160 Total

Subcatchment 5S: Post-2

Hydrograph

Runoff
1 0.96 cfs
Type III 24-hr
10-Year Rainfall=4.70"
Runoff Area=9,597 sf
Runoff Volume=3,036 cf
Runoff Depth=3.80"
Flow (cfs)

Flow Length=160'
Slope=0.0200 '/'
Tc=5.1 min
CN=92

0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
Time (hours)
345 Oak Drainage Type III 24-hr 10-Year Rainfall=4.70"
Prepared by Grady Consulting, LLC Printed 9/20/2019
HydroCAD® 10.00-21 s/n 09955 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 33

Summary for Subcatchment 6S: Pre-CB1

Runoff = 0.38 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 1,277 cf, Depth= 2.55"

Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-36.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Type III 24-hr 10-Year Rainfall=4.70"

Area (sf) CN Description

0 98 Roofs, HSG C
0 98 Paved parking, HSG C
0 98 Unconnected pavement, HSG C
0 96 Gravel surface, HSG C
6,022 79 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG C
0 73 Woods, Fair, HSG C
6,022 79 Weighted Average
6,022 100.00% Pervious Area

Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description

(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
6.1 50 0.1000 0.14 Sheet Flow,
Woods: Light underbrush n= 0.400 P2= 3.60"
2.2 147 0.0500 1.12 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Woodland Kv= 5.0 fps
8.3 197 Total

Subcatchment 6S: Pre-CB1

Hydrograph

0.42 Runoff
0.4 0.38 cfs
0.38 Type III 24-hr
0.36
0.34 10-Year Rainfall=4.70"
0.32 Runoff Area=6,022 sf
0.3
0.28
Runoff Volume=1,277 cf
0.26 Runoff Depth=2.55"
Flow (cfs)

0.24
Flow Length=197'
0.22
0.2 Tc=8.3 min
0.18 CN=79
0.16
0.14
0.12
0.1
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.02
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
Time (hours)
345 Oak Drainage Type III 24-hr 10-Year Rainfall=4.70"
Prepared by Grady Consulting, LLC Printed 9/20/2019
HydroCAD® 10.00-21 s/n 09955 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 34

Summary for Subcatchment 7S: Pre-Street

Runoff = 2.71 cfs @ 12.11 hrs, Volume= 9,054 cf, Depth= 2.90"

Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-36.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Type III 24-hr 10-Year Rainfall=4.70"

Area (sf) CN Description

986 98 Roofs, HSG C
7,388 98 Paved parking, HSG C
164 98 Unconnected pavement, HSG C
0 96 Gravel surface, HSG C
28,877 79 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG C
0 73 Woods, Fair, HSG C
37,415 83 Weighted Average
28,877 77.18% Pervious Area
8,538 22.82% Impervious Area
164 1.92% Unconnected

Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description

(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
4.9 50 0.0250 0.17 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 3.60"
3.2 213 0.0250 1.11 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Short Grass Pasture Kv= 7.0 fps
8.1 263 Total

Subcatchment 7S: Pre-Street

Hydrograph

3 Runoff
2.71 cfs
Type III 24-hr
10-Year Rainfall=4.70"
Runoff Area=37,415 sf
2
Runoff Volume=9,054 cf
Runoff Depth=2.90"
Flow (cfs)

Flow Length=263'
Slope=0.0250 '/'
Tc=8.1 min
1 CN=83

0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
Time (hours)
345 Oak Drainage Type III 24-hr 10-Year Rainfall=4.70"
Prepared by Grady Consulting, LLC Printed 9/20/2019
HydroCAD® 10.00-21 s/n 09955 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 35

Summary for Subcatchment 8S: Pre-CB2

Runoff = 0.07 cfs @ 12.05 hrs, Volume= 198 cf, Depth= 2.55"

Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-36.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Type III 24-hr 10-Year Rainfall=4.70"

Area (sf) CN Description

0 98 Roofs, HSG C
0 98 Paved parking, HSG C
0 98 Unconnected pavement, HSG C
0 96 Gravel surface, HSG C
933 79 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG C
0 73 Woods, Fair, HSG C
933 79 Weighted Average
933 100.00% Pervious Area

Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description

(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
3.1 28 0.0250 0.15 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 3.60"

Subcatchment 8S: Pre-CB2

Hydrograph

Runoff
0.075 0.07 cfs
0.07 Type III 24-hr
0.065 10-Year Rainfall=4.70"
0.06
Runoff Area=933 sf
0.055
Runoff Volume=198 cf
0.05
Runoff Depth=2.55"
0.045
Flow (cfs)

0.04
Flow Length=28'
0.035 Slope=0.0250 '/'
0.03 Tc=3.1 min
0.025 CN=79
0.02

0.015
0.01

0.005
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
Time (hours)
345 Oak Drainage Type III 24-hr 10-Year Rainfall=4.70"
Prepared by Grady Consulting, LLC Printed 9/20/2019
HydroCAD® 10.00-21 s/n 09955 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 36

Summary for Reach 8R: ADS Pipe

[52] Hint: Inlet/Outlet conditions not evaluated

[79] Warning: Submerged Pond 2P Primary device # 1 by 0.05'

Inflow Area = 32,389 sf, 65.16% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 1.17" for 10-Year event
Inflow = 0.03 cfs @ 21.14 hrs, Volume= 3,149 cf
Outflow = 0.03 cfs @ 21.15 hrs, Volume= 3,148 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.3 min

Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 0.00-36.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Max. Velocity= 2.88 fps, Min. Travel Time= 0.2 min
Avg. Velocity = 2.57 fps, Avg. Travel Time= 0.2 min

Peak Storage= 0 cf @ 21.14 hrs

Average Depth at Peak Storage= 0.05'
Bank-Full Depth= 0.67' Flow Area= 0.3 sf, Capacity= 2.98 cfs

8.0" Round Pipe

n= 0.012 Corrugated PP, smooth interior
Length= 27.0' Slope= 0.0519 '/'
Inlet Invert= 85.00', Outlet Invert= 83.60'
345 Oak Drainage Type III 24-hr 10-Year Rainfall=4.70"
Prepared by Grady Consulting, LLC Printed 9/20/2019
HydroCAD® 10.00-21 s/n 09955 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 37

Reach 8R: ADS Pipe

Hydrograph

Inflow
0.038 0.03 cfs Outflow
0.036 Inflow Area=32,389 sf 0.03 cfs
0.034 Avg. Flow Depth=0.05'
0.032
0.03 Max Vel=2.88 fps
0.028 8.0"
0.026
Round Pipe
0.024
n=0.012
Flow (cfs)

0.022
0.02 L=27.0'
0.018
0.016
S=0.0519 '/'
0.014 Capacity=2.98 cfs
0.012
0.01
0.008
0.006
0.004
0.002
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
Time (hours)
345 Oak Drainage Type III 24-hr 10-Year Rainfall=4.70"
Prepared by Grady Consulting, LLC Printed 9/20/2019
HydroCAD® 10.00-21 s/n 09955 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 38

Summary for Pond 0P: Post-Total

[40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow)

Inflow Area = 44,372 sf, 49.70% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 1.58" for 10-Year event
Inflow = 0.86 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 5,831 cf
Primary = 0.86 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 5,831 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min

Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-36.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs

Pond 0P: Post-Total

Hydrograph

Inflow
0.95 0.86 cfs Primary
0.9 0.86 cfs Inflow Area=44,372 sf
0.85
0.8
0.75
0.7
0.65
0.6
0.55
Flow (cfs)

0.5
0.45
0.4
0.35
0.3
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
Time (hours)
345 Oak Drainage Type III 24-hr 10-Year Rainfall=4.70"
Prepared by Grady Consulting, LLC Printed 9/20/2019
HydroCAD® 10.00-21 s/n 09955 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 39

Summary for Pond 1P: CB1

[40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow)

Inflow Area = 37,602 sf, 56.13% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 1.36" for 10-Year event
Inflow = 0.37 cfs @ 12.11 hrs, Volume= 4,254 cf
Primary = 0.37 cfs @ 12.11 hrs, Volume= 4,254 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min

Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-36.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs

Pond 1P: CB1

Hydrograph

Inflow
0.4 0.37 cfs Primary
0.38 0.37 cfs Inflow Area=37,602 sf
0.36
0.34
0.32
0.3
0.28
0.26
0.24
Flow (cfs)

0.22
0.2
0.18
0.16
0.14
0.12
0.1
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.02
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
Time (hours)
345 Oak Drainage Type III 24-hr 10-Year Rainfall=4.70"
Prepared by Grady Consulting, LLC Printed 9/20/2019
HydroCAD® 10.00-21 s/n 09955 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 40

Summary for Pond 2P: Pipe Storage

Inflow Area = 32,389 sf, 65.16% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 3.32" for 10-Year event
Inflow = 2.89 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 8,955 cf
Outflow = 0.03 cfs @ 21.14 hrs, Volume= 3,149 cf, Atten= 99%, Lag= 545.0 min
Primary = 0.03 cfs @ 21.14 hrs, Volume= 3,149 cf

Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-36.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs / 3
Peak Elev= 86.81' @ 21.14 hrs Surf.Area= 4,774 sf Storage= 7,287 cf

Plug-Flow detention time= 725.7 min calculated for 3,149 cf (35% of inflow)
Center-of-Mass det. time= 587.1 min ( 1,371.3 - 784.3 )

Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description

#1 85.00' 11,133 cf 36.0" Round RCP_Round 36" x 7
L= 225.0'
#2 85.00' 250 cf 5.00'W x 10.00'L x 5.00'H Tank Housing
#3 85.00' 250 cf 5.00'W x 10.00'L x 5.00'H Tank Housing
#4 85.00' 250 cf 5.00'W x 10.00'L x 5.00'H Tank Housing
11,883 cf Total Available Storage

Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices

#1 Primary 85.00' 1.0" Vert. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600
#2 Primary 87.50' 6.0" Vert. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600

Primary OutFlow Max=0.03 cfs @ 21.14 hrs HW=86.81' (Free Discharge)

1=Orifice/Grate (Orifice Controls 0.03 cfs @ 6.40 fps)
2=Orifice/Grate ( Controls 0.00 cfs)
345 Oak Drainage Type III 24-hr 10-Year Rainfall=4.70"
Prepared by Grady Consulting, LLC Printed 9/20/2019
HydroCAD® 10.00-21 s/n 09955 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 41

Pond 2P: Pipe Storage

Hydrograph

Inflow
2.89 cfs Primary
3 Inflow Area=32,389 sf
Peak Elev=86.81'
Storage=7,287 cf

2
Flow (cfs)

0.03 cfs
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
Time (hours)
345 Oak Drainage Type III 24-hr 10-Year Rainfall=4.70"
Prepared by Grady Consulting, LLC Printed 9/20/2019
HydroCAD® 10.00-21 s/n 09955 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 42

Summary for Pond 6P: Pre-Total

[40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow)

Inflow Area = 44,370 sf, 19.24% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.85" for 10-Year event
Inflow = 3.14 cfs @ 12.11 hrs, Volume= 10,530 cf
Primary = 3.14 cfs @ 12.11 hrs, Volume= 10,530 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min

Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-36.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs

Pond 6P: Pre-Total

Hydrograph

Inflow
3.14 cfs Primary
3.14 cfs Inflow Area=44,370 sf
3

2
Flow (cfs)

0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
Time (hours)
345 Oak Drainage Type III 24-hr 10-Year Rainfall=4.70"
Prepared by Grady Consulting, LLC Printed 9/20/2019
HydroCAD® 10.00-21 s/n 09955 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 43

Summary for Pond 10P: Basin

Inflow Area = 4,400 sf, 54.55% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 3.49" for 10-Year event
Inflow = 0.49 cfs @ 12.00 hrs, Volume= 1,278 cf
Outflow = 0.02 cfs @ 14.14 hrs, Volume= 949 cf, Atten= 96%, Lag= 128.0 min
Discarded = 0.01 cfs @ 14.14 hrs, Volume= 850 cf
Primary = 0.01 cfs @ 14.14 hrs, Volume= 100 cf

Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-36.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Peak Elev= 97.61' @ 14.14 hrs Surf.Area= 1,433 sf Storage= 781 cf

Plug-Flow detention time= 568.7 min calculated for 949 cf (74% of inflow)
Center-of-Mass det. time= 482.5 min ( 1,273.7 - 791.2 )

Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description

#1 97.00' 1,373 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic)Listed below (Recalc)

Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store

(feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet)
97.00 1,111 0 0
98.00 1,635 1,373 1,373

Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices

#1 Discarded 97.00' 0.270 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area
#2 Primary 97.60' 8.0" Horiz. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600
Limited to weir flow at low heads

Discarded OutFlow Max=0.01 cfs @ 14.14 hrs HW=97.61' (Free Discharge)

1=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.01 cfs)

Primary OutFlow Max=0.01 cfs @ 14.14 hrs HW=97.61' (Free Discharge)

2=Orifice/Grate (Weir Controls 0.01 cfs @ 0.39 fps)
345 Oak Drainage Type III 24-hr 10-Year Rainfall=4.70"
Prepared by Grady Consulting, LLC Printed 9/20/2019
HydroCAD® 10.00-21 s/n 09955 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 44

Pond 10P: Basin

Hydrograph

Inflow
0.49 cfs Outflow
Inflow Area=4,400 sf Discarded
Primary

0.5
Peak Elev=97.61'
Storage=781 cf
0.45

0.4

0.35
Flow (cfs)

0.3

0.25

0.2

0.15

0.1 0.02 cfs

0.01 cfs
0.05 0.01 cfs
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
Time (hours)
345 Oak Drainage Type III 24-hr 25-Year Rainfall=5.60"
Prepared by Grady Consulting, LLC Printed 9/20/2019
HydroCAD® 10.00-21 s/n 09955 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 45

Time span=0.00-36.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 3601 points

Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN
Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method

Subcatchment 0S: Post-Street Runoff Area=6,350 sf 14.90% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.62"

Flow Length=64' Slope=0.1000 '/' Tc=2.9 min CN=82 Runoff=0.69 cfs 1,916 cf

Subcatchment 1S: Post-CB1 Runoff Area=5,213 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.32"

Flow Length=165' Tc=7.5 min CN=79 Runoff=0.44 cfs 1,444 cf

Subcatchment 2S: Post-CB2 Runoff Area=420 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.32"

Flow Length=20' Slope=0.1000 '/' Tc=1.3 min CN=79 Runoff=0.04 cfs 116 cf

Subcatchment 3S: Post-1 Runoff Area=18,392 sf 67.08% Impervious Runoff Depth=4.68"

Flow Length=171' Tc=3.7 min CN=92 Runoff=2.37 cfs 7,168 cf

Subcatchment 4S: Post-Roof Runoff Area=4,400 sf 54.55% Impervious Runoff Depth=4.35"

Flow Length=35' Tc=0.2 min CN=89 Runoff=0.60 cfs 1,595 cf

Subcatchment 5S: Post-2 Runoff Area=9,597 sf 66.35% Impervious Runoff Depth=4.68"

Flow Length=160' Slope=0.0200 '/' Tc=5.1 min CN=92 Runoff=1.17 cfs 3,740 cf

Subcatchment 6S: Pre-CB1 Runoff Area=6,022 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.32"

Flow Length=197' Tc=8.3 min CN=79 Runoff=0.50 cfs 1,668 cf

Subcatchment 7S: Pre-Street Runoff Area=37,415 sf 22.82% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.72"

Flow Length=263' Slope=0.0250 '/' Tc=8.1 min CN=83 Runoff=3.46 cfs 11,604 cf

Subcatchment 8S: Pre-CB2 Runoff Area=933 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.32"

Flow Length=28' Slope=0.0250 '/' Tc=3.1 min CN=79 Runoff=0.09 cfs 258 cf

Reach 8R: ADS Pipe Avg. Flow Depth=0.05' Max Vel=2.98 fps Inflow=0.04 cfs 3,553 cf
8.0" Round Pipe n=0.012 L=27.0' S=0.0519 '/' Capacity=2.98 cfs Outflow=0.04 cfs 3,552 cf

Pond 0P: Post-Total Inflow=1.11 cfs 7,029 cf

Primary=1.11 cfs 7,029 cf

Pond 1P: CB1 Inflow=0.47 cfs 4,997 cf

Primary=0.47 cfs 4,997 cf

Pond 2P: Pipe Storage Peak Elev=87.27' Storage=9,369 cf Inflow=3.51 cfs 11,277 cf
Outflow=0.04 cfs 3,553 cf

Pond 6P: Pre-Total Inflow=4.02 cfs 13,531 cf

Primary=4.02 cfs 13,531 cf

Pond 10P: Basin Peak Elev=97.65' Storage=827 cf Inflow=0.60 cfs 1,595 cf

Discarded=0.01 cfs 874 cf Primary=0.07 cfs 369 cf Outflow=0.08 cfs 1,243 cf

Total Runoff Area = 88,742 sf Runoff Volume = 29,510 cf Average Runoff Depth = 3.99"
65.53% Pervious = 58,152 sf 34.47% Impervious = 30,590 sf
345 Oak Drainage Type III 24-hr 25-Year Rainfall=5.60"
Prepared by Grady Consulting, LLC Printed 9/20/2019
HydroCAD® 10.00-21 s/n 09955 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 46

Summary for Subcatchment 0S: Post-Street

Runoff = 0.69 cfs @ 12.04 hrs, Volume= 1,916 cf, Depth= 3.62"

Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-36.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Type III 24-hr 25-Year Rainfall=5.60"

Area (sf) CN Description

0 98 Roofs, HSG C
946 98 Paved parking, HSG C
0 98 Unconnected pavement, HSG C
5,404 79 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG C
0 73 Woods, Fair, HSG C
6,350 82 Weighted Average
5,404 85.10% Pervious Area
946 14.90% Impervious Area

Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description

(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
2.8 50 0.1000 0.30 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 3.60"
0.1 14 0.1000 2.21 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Short Grass Pasture Kv= 7.0 fps
2.9 64 Total

Subcatchment 0S: Post-Street

Hydrograph

0.75 Runoff
0.69 cfs
0.7
Type III 24-hr
0.65
25-Year Rainfall=5.60"
0.6
Runoff Area=6,350 sf
0.55
Runoff Volume=1,916 cf
0.5
Runoff Depth=3.62"
0.45
Flow (cfs)

0.4
Flow Length=64'
0.35
Slope=0.1000 '/'
0.3
Tc=2.9 min
0.25 CN=82
0.2

0.15

0.1
0.05

0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
Time (hours)
345 Oak Drainage Type III 24-hr 25-Year Rainfall=5.60"
Prepared by Grady Consulting, LLC Printed 9/20/2019
HydroCAD® 10.00-21 s/n 09955 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 47

Summary for Subcatchment 1S: Post-CB1

Runoff = 0.44 cfs @ 12.11 hrs, Volume= 1,444 cf, Depth= 3.32"

Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-36.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Type III 24-hr 25-Year Rainfall=5.60"

Area (sf) CN Description

0 98 Roofs, HSG C
0 98 Paved parking, HSG C
0 98 Unconnected pavement, HSG C
5,213 79 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG C
0 73 Woods, Fair, HSG C
5,213 79 Weighted Average
5,213 100.00% Pervious Area

Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description

(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
6.5 50 0.0120 0.13 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 3.60"
1.0 115 0.0750 1.92 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Short Grass Pasture Kv= 7.0 fps
7.5 165 Total

Subcatchment 1S: Post-CB1

Hydrograph

0.48 Runoff
0.46 0.44 cfs
0.44 Type III 24-hr
0.42
0.4 25-Year Rainfall=5.60"
0.38
0.36
Runoff Area=5,213 sf
0.34 Runoff Volume=1,444 cf
0.32
0.3 Runoff Depth=3.32"
0.28
Flow (cfs)

0.26
Flow Length=165'
0.24 Tc=7.5 min
0.22
0.2 CN=79
0.18
0.16
0.14
0.12
0.1
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.02
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
Time (hours)
345 Oak Drainage Type III 24-hr 25-Year Rainfall=5.60"
Prepared by Grady Consulting, LLC Printed 9/20/2019
HydroCAD® 10.00-21 s/n 09955 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 48

Summary for Subcatchment 2S: Post-CB2

Runoff = 0.04 cfs @ 12.02 hrs, Volume= 116 cf, Depth= 3.32"

Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-36.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Type III 24-hr 25-Year Rainfall=5.60"

Area (sf) CN Description

0 98 Roofs, HSG C
0 98 Paved parking, HSG C
0 98 Unconnected pavement, HSG C
420 79 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG C
0 73 Woods, Fair, HSG C
420 79 Weighted Average
420 100.00% Pervious Area

Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description

(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
1.3 20 0.1000 0.25 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 3.60"

Subcatchment 2S: Post-CB2

Hydrograph

Runoff
0.048
0.046 0.04 cfs
0.044 Type III 24-hr
0.042
0.04 25-Year Rainfall=5.60"
0.038
0.036 Runoff Area=420 sf
0.034
0.032
Runoff Volume=116 cf
0.03 Runoff Depth=3.32"
Flow (cfs)

0.028
0.026 Flow Length=20'
0.024
0.022 Slope=0.1000 '/'
0.02
0.018
Tc=1.3 min
0.016 CN=79
0.014
0.012
0.01
0.008
0.006
0.004
0.002
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
Time (hours)
345 Oak Drainage Type III 24-hr 25-Year Rainfall=5.60"
Prepared by Grady Consulting, LLC Printed 9/20/2019
HydroCAD® 10.00-21 s/n 09955 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 49

Summary for Subcatchment 3S: Post-1

Runoff = 2.37 cfs @ 12.05 hrs, Volume= 7,168 cf, Depth= 4.68"

Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-36.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Type III 24-hr 25-Year Rainfall=5.60"

Area (sf) CN Description

1,560 98 Roofs, HSG C
9,716 98 Paved parking, HSG C
1,062 98 Unconnected pavement, HSG C
6,054 79 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG C
0 73 Woods, Fair, HSG C
18,392 92 Weighted Average
6,054 32.92% Pervious Area
12,338 67.08% Impervious Area
1,062 8.61% Unconnected

Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description

(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
2.7 41 0.0730 0.25 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 3.60"
0.3 15 0.0200 1.00 Sheet Flow,
Smooth surfaces n= 0.011 P2= 3.60"
0.7 115 0.0200 2.87 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Paved Kv= 20.3 fps
3.7 171 Total
345 Oak Drainage Type III 24-hr 25-Year Rainfall=5.60"
Prepared by Grady Consulting, LLC Printed 9/20/2019
HydroCAD® 10.00-21 s/n 09955 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 50

Subcatchment 3S: Post-1

Hydrograph

Runoff
2.37 cfs
Type III 24-hr
25-Year Rainfall=5.60"
2 Runoff Area=18,392 sf
Runoff Volume=7,168 cf
Runoff Depth=4.68"
Flow (cfs)

Flow Length=171'
Tc=3.7 min
CN=92
1

0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
Time (hours)
345 Oak Drainage Type III 24-hr 25-Year Rainfall=5.60"
Prepared by Grady Consulting, LLC Printed 9/20/2019
HydroCAD® 10.00-21 s/n 09955 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 51

Summary for Subcatchment 4S: Post-Roof

[49] Hint: Tc<2dt may require smaller dt

Runoff = 0.60 cfs @ 12.00 hrs, Volume= 1,595 cf, Depth= 4.35"

Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-36.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Type III 24-hr 25-Year Rainfall=5.60"

Area (sf) CN Description

2,400 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG C
2,000 79 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG C
4,400 89 Weighted Average
2,000 45.45% Pervious Area
2,400 54.55% Impervious Area
2,400 100.00% Unconnected

Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description

(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
0.1 20 0.3000 3.12 Sheet Flow,
Smooth surfaces n= 0.011 P2= 3.60"
0.1 15 0.0200 2.12 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Grassed Waterway Kv= 15.0 fps
0.2 35 Total

Subcatchment 4S: Post-Roof

Hydrograph

Runoff
0.65
0.60 cfs
0.6 Type III 24-hr
0.55 25-Year Rainfall=5.60"
0.5 Runoff Area=4,400 sf
0.45 Runoff Volume=1,595 cf
0.4
Runoff Depth=4.35"
Flow (cfs)

0.35
Flow Length=35'
Tc=0.2 min
0.3
CN=89
0.25

0.2

0.15

0.1

0.05

0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
Time (hours)
345 Oak Drainage Type III 24-hr 25-Year Rainfall=5.60"
Prepared by Grady Consulting, LLC Printed 9/20/2019
HydroCAD® 10.00-21 s/n 09955 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 52

Summary for Subcatchment 5S: Post-2

Runoff = 1.17 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 3,740 cf, Depth= 4.68"

Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-36.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Type III 24-hr 25-Year Rainfall=5.60"

Area (sf) CN Description

0 98 Roofs, HSG C
5,951 98 Paved parking, HSG C
417 98 Unconnected pavement, HSG C
3,229 79 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG C
0 73 Woods, Fair, HSG C
9,597 92 Weighted Average
3,229 33.65% Pervious Area
6,368 66.35% Impervious Area
417 6.55% Unconnected

Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description

(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
4.4 40 0.0200 0.15 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 3.60"
0.7 120 0.0200 2.87 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Paved Kv= 20.3 fps
5.1 160 Total

Subcatchment 5S: Post-2

Hydrograph

Runoff
1.17 cfs
Type III 24-hr
25-Year Rainfall=5.60"
1 Runoff Area=9,597 sf
Runoff Volume=3,740 cf
Runoff Depth=4.68"
Flow (cfs)

Flow Length=160'
Slope=0.0200 '/'
Tc=5.1 min
CN=92

0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
Time (hours)
345 Oak Drainage Type III 24-hr 25-Year Rainfall=5.60"
Prepared by Grady Consulting, LLC Printed 9/20/2019
HydroCAD® 10.00-21 s/n 09955 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 53

Summary for Subcatchment 6S: Pre-CB1

Runoff = 0.50 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 1,668 cf, Depth= 3.32"

Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-36.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Type III 24-hr 25-Year Rainfall=5.60"

Area (sf) CN Description

0 98 Roofs, HSG C
0 98 Paved parking, HSG C
0 98 Unconnected pavement, HSG C
0 96 Gravel surface, HSG C
6,022 79 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG C
0 73 Woods, Fair, HSG C
6,022 79 Weighted Average
6,022 100.00% Pervious Area

Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description

(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
6.1 50 0.1000 0.14 Sheet Flow,
Woods: Light underbrush n= 0.400 P2= 3.60"
2.2 147 0.0500 1.12 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Woodland Kv= 5.0 fps
8.3 197 Total

Subcatchment 6S: Pre-CB1

Hydrograph

0.55 Runoff
0.50 cfs
0.5
Type III 24-hr
0.45 25-Year Rainfall=5.60"
Runoff Area=6,022 sf
0.4
Runoff Volume=1,668 cf
0.35
Runoff Depth=3.32"
Flow (cfs)

0.3 Flow Length=197'

Tc=8.3 min
0.25
CN=79
0.2

0.15

0.1

0.05

0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
Time (hours)
345 Oak Drainage Type III 24-hr 25-Year Rainfall=5.60"
Prepared by Grady Consulting, LLC Printed 9/20/2019
HydroCAD® 10.00-21 s/n 09955 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 54

Summary for Subcatchment 7S: Pre-Street

Runoff = 3.46 cfs @ 12.11 hrs, Volume= 11,604 cf, Depth= 3.72"

Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-36.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Type III 24-hr 25-Year Rainfall=5.60"

Area (sf) CN Description

986 98 Roofs, HSG C
7,388 98 Paved parking, HSG C
164 98 Unconnected pavement, HSG C
0 96 Gravel surface, HSG C
28,877 79 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG C
0 73 Woods, Fair, HSG C
37,415 83 Weighted Average
28,877 77.18% Pervious Area
8,538 22.82% Impervious Area
164 1.92% Unconnected

Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description

(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
4.9 50 0.0250 0.17 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 3.60"
3.2 213 0.0250 1.11 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Short Grass Pasture Kv= 7.0 fps
8.1 263 Total

Subcatchment 7S: Pre-Street

Hydrograph

Runoff
3.46 cfs
Type III 24-hr
25-Year Rainfall=5.60"
3
Runoff Area=37,415 sf
Runoff Volume=11,604 cf
Runoff Depth=3.72"
Flow Length=263'
Flow (cfs)

2
Slope=0.0250 '/'
Tc=8.1 min
CN=83

0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
Time (hours)
345 Oak Drainage Type III 24-hr 25-Year Rainfall=5.60"
Prepared by Grady Consulting, LLC Printed 9/20/2019
HydroCAD® 10.00-21 s/n 09955 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 55

Summary for Subcatchment 8S: Pre-CB2

Runoff = 0.09 cfs @ 12.05 hrs, Volume= 258 cf, Depth= 3.32"

Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-36.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Type III 24-hr 25-Year Rainfall=5.60"

Area (sf) CN Description

0 98 Roofs, HSG C
0 98 Paved parking, HSG C
0 98 Unconnected pavement, HSG C
0 96 Gravel surface, HSG C
933 79 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG C
0 73 Woods, Fair, HSG C
933 79 Weighted Average
933 100.00% Pervious Area

Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description

(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
3.1 28 0.0250 0.15 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 3.60"

Subcatchment 8S: Pre-CB2

Hydrograph

0.1 Runoff

0.095
0.09 cfs
0.09 Type III 24-hr
0.085 25-Year Rainfall=5.60"
0.08
0.075 Runoff Area=933 sf
0.07 Runoff Volume=258 cf
0.065
0.06
Runoff Depth=3.32"
Flow (cfs)

0.055 Flow Length=28'

0.05
0.045
Slope=0.0250 '/'
0.04 Tc=3.1 min
0.035
0.03
CN=79
0.025
0.02
0.015
0.01
0.005
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
Time (hours)
345 Oak Drainage Type III 24-hr 25-Year Rainfall=5.60"
Prepared by Grady Consulting, LLC Printed 9/20/2019
HydroCAD® 10.00-21 s/n 09955 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 56

Summary for Reach 8R: ADS Pipe

[52] Hint: Inlet/Outlet conditions not evaluated

[79] Warning: Submerged Pond 2P Primary device # 1 by 0.05'

Inflow Area = 32,389 sf, 65.16% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 1.32" for 25-Year event
Inflow = 0.04 cfs @ 21.83 hrs, Volume= 3,553 cf
Outflow = 0.04 cfs @ 21.83 hrs, Volume= 3,552 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.2 min

Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 0.00-36.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Max. Velocity= 2.98 fps, Min. Travel Time= 0.2 min
Avg. Velocity = 2.65 fps, Avg. Travel Time= 0.2 min

Peak Storage= 0 cf @ 21.83 hrs

Average Depth at Peak Storage= 0.05'
Bank-Full Depth= 0.67' Flow Area= 0.3 sf, Capacity= 2.98 cfs

8.0" Round Pipe

n= 0.012 Corrugated PP, smooth interior
Length= 27.0' Slope= 0.0519 '/'
Inlet Invert= 85.00', Outlet Invert= 83.60'
345 Oak Drainage Type III 24-hr 25-Year Rainfall=5.60"
Prepared by Grady Consulting, LLC Printed 9/20/2019
HydroCAD® 10.00-21 s/n 09955 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 57

Reach 8R: ADS Pipe

Hydrograph

Inflow
0.04 cfs Outflow
0.042
Inflow Area=32,389 sf 0.04 cfs
0.04
0.038 Avg. Flow Depth=0.05'
0.036
0.034 Max Vel=2.98 fps
0.032 8.0"
0.03
0.028 Round Pipe
0.026
n=0.012
Flow (cfs)

0.024
0.022 L=27.0'
0.02
0.018
S=0.0519 '/'
0.016 Capacity=2.98 cfs
0.014
0.012
0.01
0.008
0.006
0.004
0.002
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
Time (hours)
345 Oak Drainage Type III 24-hr 25-Year Rainfall=5.60"
Prepared by Grady Consulting, LLC Printed 9/20/2019
HydroCAD® 10.00-21 s/n 09955 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 58

Summary for Pond 0P: Post-Total

[40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow)

Inflow Area = 44,372 sf, 49.70% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 1.90" for 25-Year event
Inflow = 1.11 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 7,029 cf
Primary = 1.11 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 7,029 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min

Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-36.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs

Pond 0P: Post-Total

Hydrograph

Inflow
1.11 cfs Primary
1.11 cfs Inflow Area=44,372 sf

1
Flow (cfs)

0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
Time (hours)
345 Oak Drainage Type III 24-hr 25-Year Rainfall=5.60"
Prepared by Grady Consulting, LLC Printed 9/20/2019
HydroCAD® 10.00-21 s/n 09955 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 59

Summary for Pond 1P: CB1

[40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow)

Inflow Area = 37,602 sf, 56.13% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 1.59" for 25-Year event
Inflow = 0.47 cfs @ 12.11 hrs, Volume= 4,997 cf
Primary = 0.47 cfs @ 12.11 hrs, Volume= 4,997 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min

Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-36.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs

Pond 1P: CB1

Hydrograph

Inflow
0.47 cfs Primary
0.5 0.47 cfs Inflow Area=37,602 sf
0.45

0.4

0.35

0.3
Flow (cfs)

0.25

0.2

0.15

0.1

0.05

0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
Time (hours)
345 Oak Drainage Type III 24-hr 25-Year Rainfall=5.60"
Prepared by Grady Consulting, LLC Printed 9/20/2019
HydroCAD® 10.00-21 s/n 09955 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 60

Summary for Pond 2P: Pipe Storage

Inflow Area = 32,389 sf, 65.16% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 4.18" for 25-Year event
Inflow = 3.51 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 11,277 cf
Outflow = 0.04 cfs @ 21.83 hrs, Volume= 3,553 cf, Atten= 99%, Lag= 586.1 min
Primary = 0.04 cfs @ 21.83 hrs, Volume= 3,553 cf

Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-36.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs / 3
Peak Elev= 87.27' @ 21.83 hrs Surf.Area= 4,209 sf Storage= 9,369 cf

Plug-Flow detention time= 738.0 min calculated for 3,553 cf (32% of inflow)
Center-of-Mass det. time= 587.7 min ( 1,366.9 - 779.2 )

Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description

#1 85.00' 11,133 cf 36.0" Round RCP_Round 36" x 7
L= 225.0'
#2 85.00' 250 cf 5.00'W x 10.00'L x 5.00'H Tank Housing
#3 85.00' 250 cf 5.00'W x 10.00'L x 5.00'H Tank Housing
#4 85.00' 250 cf 5.00'W x 10.00'L x 5.00'H Tank Housing
11,883 cf Total Available Storage

Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices

#1 Primary 85.00' 1.0" Vert. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600
#2 Primary 87.50' 6.0" Vert. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600

Primary OutFlow Max=0.04 cfs @ 21.83 hrs HW=87.27' (Free Discharge)

1=Orifice/Grate (Orifice Controls 0.04 cfs @ 7.18 fps)
2=Orifice/Grate ( Controls 0.00 cfs)
345 Oak Drainage Type III 24-hr 25-Year Rainfall=5.60"
Prepared by Grady Consulting, LLC Printed 9/20/2019
HydroCAD® 10.00-21 s/n 09955 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 61

Pond 2P: Pipe Storage

Hydrograph

Inflow
3.51 cfs Primary
Inflow Area=32,389 sf
Peak Elev=87.27'
3 Storage=9,369 cf
Flow (cfs)

0.04 cfs
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
Time (hours)
345 Oak Drainage Type III 24-hr 25-Year Rainfall=5.60"
Prepared by Grady Consulting, LLC Printed 9/20/2019
HydroCAD® 10.00-21 s/n 09955 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 62

Summary for Pond 6P: Pre-Total

[40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow)

Inflow Area = 44,370 sf, 19.24% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 3.66" for 25-Year event
Inflow = 4.02 cfs @ 12.11 hrs, Volume= 13,531 cf
Primary = 4.02 cfs @ 12.11 hrs, Volume= 13,531 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min

Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-36.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs

Pond 6P: Pre-Total

Hydrograph

Inflow
4.02 cfs Primary
4.02 cfs Inflow Area=44,370 sf
4

3
Flow (cfs)

0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
Time (hours)
345 Oak Drainage Type III 24-hr 25-Year Rainfall=5.60"
Prepared by Grady Consulting, LLC Printed 9/20/2019
HydroCAD® 10.00-21 s/n 09955 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 63

Summary for Pond 10P: Basin

Inflow Area = 4,400 sf, 54.55% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 4.35" for 25-Year event
Inflow = 0.60 cfs @ 12.00 hrs, Volume= 1,595 cf
Outflow = 0.08 cfs @ 12.48 hrs, Volume= 1,243 cf, Atten= 87%, Lag= 28.3 min
Discarded = 0.01 cfs @ 12.48 hrs, Volume= 874 cf
Primary = 0.07 cfs @ 12.48 hrs, Volume= 369 cf

Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-36.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Peak Elev= 97.65' @ 12.48 hrs Surf.Area= 1,449 sf Storage= 827 cf

Plug-Flow detention time= 453.8 min calculated for 1,242 cf (78% of inflow)
Center-of-Mass det. time= 374.5 min ( 1,159.6 - 785.1 )

Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description

#1 97.00' 1,373 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic)Listed below (Recalc)

Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store

(feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet)
97.00 1,111 0 0
98.00 1,635 1,373 1,373

Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices

#1 Discarded 97.00' 0.270 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area
#2 Primary 97.60' 8.0" Horiz. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600
Limited to weir flow at low heads

Discarded OutFlow Max=0.01 cfs @ 12.48 hrs HW=97.65' (Free Discharge)

1=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.01 cfs)

Primary OutFlow Max=0.07 cfs @ 12.48 hrs HW=97.65' (Free Discharge)

2=Orifice/Grate (Weir Controls 0.07 cfs @ 0.70 fps)
345 Oak Drainage Type III 24-hr 25-Year Rainfall=5.60"
Prepared by Grady Consulting, LLC Printed 9/20/2019
HydroCAD® 10.00-21 s/n 09955 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 64

Pond 10P: Basin

Hydrograph

Inflow
0.60 cfs Outflow
Inflow Area=4,400 sf Discarded
Primary
0.65
Peak Elev=97.65'
0.6
Storage=827 cf
0.55
0.5

0.45

0.4
Flow (cfs)

0.35

0.3

0.25

0.2
0.08 cfs
0.15

0.1 0.07 cfs

0.01 cfs
0.05

0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
Time (hours)
345 Oak Drainage Type III 24-hr 100-Year Rainfall=7.00"
Prepared by Grady Consulting, LLC Printed 9/20/2019
HydroCAD® 10.00-21 s/n 09955 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 65

Time span=0.00-36.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 3601 points

Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN
Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method

Subcatchment 0S: Post-Street Runoff Area=6,350 sf 14.90% Impervious Runoff Depth=4.92"

Flow Length=64' Slope=0.1000 '/' Tc=2.9 min CN=82 Runoff=0.93 cfs 2,601 cf

Subcatchment 1S: Post-CB1 Runoff Area=5,213 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=4.58"

Flow Length=165' Tc=7.5 min CN=79 Runoff=0.61 cfs 1,992 cf

Subcatchment 2S: Post-CB2 Runoff Area=420 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=4.58"

Flow Length=20' Slope=0.1000 '/' Tc=1.3 min CN=79 Runoff=0.06 cfs 160 cf

Subcatchment 3S: Post-1 Runoff Area=18,392 sf 67.08% Impervious Runoff Depth=6.05"

Flow Length=171' Tc=3.7 min CN=92 Runoff=3.02 cfs 9,280 cf

Subcatchment 4S: Post-Roof Runoff Area=4,400 sf 54.55% Impervious Runoff Depth=5.71"

Flow Length=35' Tc=0.2 min CN=89 Runoff=0.78 cfs 2,093 cf

Subcatchment 5S: Post-2 Runoff Area=9,597 sf 66.35% Impervious Runoff Depth=6.05"

Flow Length=160' Slope=0.0200 '/' Tc=5.1 min CN=92 Runoff=1.50 cfs 4,842 cf

Subcatchment 6S: Pre-CB1 Runoff Area=6,022 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=4.58"

Flow Length=197' Tc=8.3 min CN=79 Runoff=0.68 cfs 2,301 cf

Subcatchment 7S: Pre-Street Runoff Area=37,415 sf 22.82% Impervious Runoff Depth=5.03"

Flow Length=263' Slope=0.0250 '/' Tc=8.1 min CN=83 Runoff=4.62 cfs 15,676 cf

Subcatchment 8S: Pre-CB2 Runoff Area=933 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=4.58"

Flow Length=28' Slope=0.0250 '/' Tc=3.1 min CN=79 Runoff=0.13 cfs 356 cf

Reach 8R: ADS Pipe Avg. Flow Depth=0.11' Max Vel=4.79 fps Inflow=0.19 cfs 6,187 cf
8.0" Round Pipe n=0.012 L=27.0' S=0.0519 '/' Capacity=2.98 cfs Outflow=0.19 cfs 6,186 cf

Pond 0P: Post-Total Inflow=1.50 cfs 10,939 cf

Primary=1.50 cfs 10,939 cf

Pond 1P: CB1 Inflow=0.64 cfs 8,178 cf

Primary=0.64 cfs 8,178 cf

Pond 2P: Pipe Storage Peak Elev=87.73' Storage=11,054 cf Inflow=4.57 cfs 14,934 cf
Outflow=0.19 cfs 6,187 cf

Pond 6P: Pre-Total Inflow=5.39 cfs 18,333 cf

Primary=5.39 cfs 18,333 cf

Pond 10P: Basin Peak Elev=97.70' Storage=911 cf Inflow=0.78 cfs 2,093 cf

Discarded=0.01 cfs 904 cf Primary=0.23 cfs 812 cf Outflow=0.24 cfs 1,716 cf

Total Runoff Area = 88,742 sf Runoff Volume = 39,302 cf Average Runoff Depth = 5.31"
65.53% Pervious = 58,152 sf 34.47% Impervious = 30,590 sf
345 Oak Drainage Type III 24-hr 100-Year Rainfall=7.00"
Prepared by Grady Consulting, LLC Printed 9/20/2019
HydroCAD® 10.00-21 s/n 09955 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 66

Summary for Subcatchment 0S: Post-Street

Runoff = 0.93 cfs @ 12.04 hrs, Volume= 2,601 cf, Depth= 4.92"

Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-36.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Type III 24-hr 100-Year Rainfall=7.00"

Area (sf) CN Description

0 98 Roofs, HSG C
946 98 Paved parking, HSG C
0 98 Unconnected pavement, HSG C
5,404 79 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG C
0 73 Woods, Fair, HSG C
6,350 82 Weighted Average
5,404 85.10% Pervious Area
946 14.90% Impervious Area

Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description

(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
2.8 50 0.1000 0.30 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 3.60"
0.1 14 0.1000 2.21 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Short Grass Pasture Kv= 7.0 fps
2.9 64 Total

Subcatchment 0S: Post-Street

Hydrograph

1 Runoff
0.93 cfs
Type III 24-hr
100-Year Rainfall=7.00"
Runoff Area=6,350 sf
Runoff Volume=2,601 cf
Runoff Depth=4.92"
Flow (cfs)

Flow Length=64'
Slope=0.1000 '/'
Tc=2.9 min
CN=82

0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
Time (hours)
345 Oak Drainage Type III 24-hr 100-Year Rainfall=7.00"
Prepared by Grady Consulting, LLC Printed 9/20/2019
HydroCAD® 10.00-21 s/n 09955 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 67

Summary for Subcatchment 1S: Post-CB1

Runoff = 0.61 cfs @ 12.11 hrs, Volume= 1,992 cf, Depth= 4.58"

Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-36.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Type III 24-hr 100-Year Rainfall=7.00"

Area (sf) CN Description

0 98 Roofs, HSG C
0 98 Paved parking, HSG C
0 98 Unconnected pavement, HSG C
5,213 79 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG C
0 73 Woods, Fair, HSG C
5,213 79 Weighted Average
5,213 100.00% Pervious Area

Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description

(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
6.5 50 0.0120 0.13 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 3.60"
1.0 115 0.0750 1.92 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Short Grass Pasture Kv= 7.0 fps
7.5 165 Total

Subcatchment 1S: Post-CB1

Hydrograph

Runoff
0.65
0.61 cfs
0.6 Type III 24-hr
0.55 100-Year Rainfall=7.00"
0.5 Runoff Area=5,213 sf
0.45 Runoff Volume=1,992 cf
0.4
Runoff Depth=4.58"
Flow (cfs)

Flow Length=165'
0.35
Tc=7.5 min
0.3
CN=79
0.25

0.2

0.15

0.1

0.05

0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
Time (hours)
345 Oak Drainage Type III 24-hr 100-Year Rainfall=7.00"
Prepared by Grady Consulting, LLC Printed 9/20/2019
HydroCAD® 10.00-21 s/n 09955 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 68

Summary for Subcatchment 2S: Post-CB2

Runoff = 0.06 cfs @ 12.02 hrs, Volume= 160 cf, Depth= 4.58"

Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-36.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Type III 24-hr 100-Year Rainfall=7.00"

Area (sf) CN Description

0 98 Roofs, HSG C
0 98 Paved parking, HSG C
0 98 Unconnected pavement, HSG C
420 79 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG C
0 73 Woods, Fair, HSG C
420 79 Weighted Average
420 100.00% Pervious Area

Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description

(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
1.3 20 0.1000 0.25 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 3.60"

Subcatchment 2S: Post-CB2

Hydrograph

Runoff
0.065 0.06 cfs
0.06 Type III 24-hr
0.055 100-Year Rainfall=7.00"
0.05 Runoff Area=420 sf
0.045
Runoff Volume=160 cf
0.04
Runoff Depth=4.58"
Flow (cfs)

Flow Length=20'
0.035
Slope=0.1000 '/'
0.03
Tc=1.3 min
0.025
CN=79
0.02

0.015

0.01

0.005

0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
Time (hours)
345 Oak Drainage Type III 24-hr 100-Year Rainfall=7.00"
Prepared by Grady Consulting, LLC Printed 9/20/2019
HydroCAD® 10.00-21 s/n 09955 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 69

Summary for Subcatchment 3S: Post-1

Runoff = 3.02 cfs @ 12.05 hrs, Volume= 9,280 cf, Depth= 6.05"

Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-36.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Type III 24-hr 100-Year Rainfall=7.00"

Area (sf) CN Description

1,560 98 Roofs, HSG C
9,716 98 Paved parking, HSG C
1,062 98 Unconnected pavement, HSG C
6,054 79 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG C
0 73 Woods, Fair, HSG C
18,392 92 Weighted Average
6,054 32.92% Pervious Area
12,338 67.08% Impervious Area
1,062 8.61% Unconnected

Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description

(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
2.7 41 0.0730 0.25 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 3.60"
0.3 15 0.0200 1.00 Sheet Flow,
Smooth surfaces n= 0.011 P2= 3.60"
0.7 115 0.0200 2.87 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Paved Kv= 20.3 fps
3.7 171 Total
345 Oak Drainage Type III 24-hr 100-Year Rainfall=7.00"
Prepared by Grady Consulting, LLC Printed 9/20/2019
HydroCAD® 10.00-21 s/n 09955 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 70

Subcatchment 3S: Post-1

Hydrograph

Runoff
3.02 cfs
3 Type III 24-hr
100-Year Rainfall=7.00"
Runoff Area=18,392 sf
Runoff Volume=9,280 cf
2
Runoff Depth=6.05"
Flow (cfs)

Flow Length=171'
Tc=3.7 min
CN=92

0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
Time (hours)
345 Oak Drainage Type III 24-hr 100-Year Rainfall=7.00"
Prepared by Grady Consulting, LLC Printed 9/20/2019
HydroCAD® 10.00-21 s/n 09955 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 71

Summary for Subcatchment 4S: Post-Roof

[49] Hint: Tc<2dt may require smaller dt

Runoff = 0.78 cfs @ 12.00 hrs, Volume= 2,093 cf, Depth= 5.71"

Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-36.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Type III 24-hr 100-Year Rainfall=7.00"

Area (sf) CN Description

2,400 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG C
2,000 79 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG C
4,400 89 Weighted Average
2,000 45.45% Pervious Area
2,400 54.55% Impervious Area
2,400 100.00% Unconnected

Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description

(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
0.1 20 0.3000 3.12 Sheet Flow,
Smooth surfaces n= 0.011 P2= 3.60"
0.1 15 0.0200 2.12 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Grassed Waterway Kv= 15.0 fps
0.2 35 Total

Subcatchment 4S: Post-Roof

Hydrograph

0.85 Runoff

0.8
0.78 cfs
0.75
Type III 24-hr
0.7 100-Year Rainfall=7.00"
0.65 Runoff Area=4,400 sf
0.6 Runoff Volume=2,093 cf
0.55
Runoff Depth=5.71"
0.5
Flow (cfs)

Flow Length=35'
0.45
0.4
Tc=0.2 min
0.35 CN=89
0.3
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
Time (hours)
345 Oak Drainage Type III 24-hr 100-Year Rainfall=7.00"
Prepared by Grady Consulting, LLC Printed 9/20/2019
HydroCAD® 10.00-21 s/n 09955 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 72

Summary for Subcatchment 5S: Post-2

Runoff = 1.50 cfs @ 12.07 hrs, Volume= 4,842 cf, Depth= 6.05"

Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-36.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Type III 24-hr 100-Year Rainfall=7.00"

Area (sf) CN Description

0 98 Roofs, HSG C
5,951 98 Paved parking, HSG C
417 98 Unconnected pavement, HSG C
3,229 79 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG C
0 73 Woods, Fair, HSG C
9,597 92 Weighted Average
3,229 33.65% Pervious Area
6,368 66.35% Impervious Area
417 6.55% Unconnected

Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description

(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
4.4 40 0.0200 0.15 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 3.60"
0.7 120 0.0200 2.87 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Paved Kv= 20.3 fps
5.1 160 Total

Subcatchment 5S: Post-2

Hydrograph

Runoff
1.50 cfs
Type III 24-hr
100-Year Rainfall=7.00"
Runoff Area=9,597 sf
Runoff Volume=4,842 cf
1 Runoff Depth=6.05"
Flow (cfs)

Flow Length=160'
Slope=0.0200 '/'
Tc=5.1 min
CN=92

0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
Time (hours)
345 Oak Drainage Type III 24-hr 100-Year Rainfall=7.00"
Prepared by Grady Consulting, LLC Printed 9/20/2019
HydroCAD® 10.00-21 s/n 09955 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 73

Summary for Subcatchment 6S: Pre-CB1

Runoff = 0.68 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 2,301 cf, Depth= 4.58"

Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-36.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Type III 24-hr 100-Year Rainfall=7.00"

Area (sf) CN Description

0 98 Roofs, HSG C
0 98 Paved parking, HSG C
0 98 Unconnected pavement, HSG C
0 96 Gravel surface, HSG C
6,022 79 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG C
0 73 Woods, Fair, HSG C
6,022 79 Weighted Average
6,022 100.00% Pervious Area

Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description

(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
6.1 50 0.1000 0.14 Sheet Flow,
Woods: Light underbrush n= 0.400 P2= 3.60"
2.2 147 0.0500 1.12 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Woodland Kv= 5.0 fps
8.3 197 Total

Subcatchment 6S: Pre-CB1

Hydrograph

0.75 Runoff
0.7
0.68 cfs
Type III 24-hr
0.65
100-Year Rainfall=7.00"
0.6

0.55
Runoff Area=6,022 sf
0.5
Runoff Volume=2,301 cf
0.45
Runoff Depth=4.58"
Flow (cfs)

0.4
Flow Length=197'
0.35
Tc=8.3 min
0.3 CN=79
0.25

0.2

0.15

0.1

0.05

0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
Time (hours)
345 Oak Drainage Type III 24-hr 100-Year Rainfall=7.00"
Prepared by Grady Consulting, LLC Printed 9/20/2019
HydroCAD® 10.00-21 s/n 09955 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 74

Summary for Subcatchment 7S: Pre-Street

Runoff = 4.62 cfs @ 12.11 hrs, Volume= 15,676 cf, Depth= 5.03"

Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-36.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Type III 24-hr 100-Year Rainfall=7.00"

Area (sf) CN Description

986 98 Roofs, HSG C
7,388 98 Paved parking, HSG C
164 98 Unconnected pavement, HSG C
0 96 Gravel surface, HSG C
28,877 79 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG C
0 73 Woods, Fair, HSG C
37,415 83 Weighted Average
28,877 77.18% Pervious Area
8,538 22.82% Impervious Area
164 1.92% Unconnected

Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description

(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
4.9 50 0.0250 0.17 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 3.60"
3.2 213 0.0250 1.11 Shallow Concentrated Flow,
Short Grass Pasture Kv= 7.0 fps
8.1 263 Total

Subcatchment 7S: Pre-Street

Hydrograph

5 Runoff
4.62 cfs
Type III 24-hr
100-Year Rainfall=7.00"
4
Runoff Area=37,415 sf
Runoff Volume=15,676 cf
Runoff Depth=5.03"
3
Flow Length=263'
Flow (cfs)

Slope=0.0250 '/'
Tc=8.1 min
2
CN=83

0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
Time (hours)
345 Oak Drainage Type III 24-hr 100-Year Rainfall=7.00"
Prepared by Grady Consulting, LLC Printed 9/20/2019
HydroCAD® 10.00-21 s/n 09955 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 75

Summary for Subcatchment 8S: Pre-CB2

Runoff = 0.13 cfs @ 12.05 hrs, Volume= 356 cf, Depth= 4.58"

Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-36.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Type III 24-hr 100-Year Rainfall=7.00"

Area (sf) CN Description

0 98 Roofs, HSG C
0 98 Paved parking, HSG C
0 98 Unconnected pavement, HSG C
0 96 Gravel surface, HSG C
933 79 50-75% Grass cover, Fair, HSG C
0 73 Woods, Fair, HSG C
933 79 Weighted Average
933 100.00% Pervious Area

Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description

(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs)
3.1 28 0.0250 0.15 Sheet Flow,
Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 3.60"

Subcatchment 8S: Pre-CB2

Hydrograph

0.14 Runoff

0.13
0.13 cfs
Type III 24-hr
0.12
100-Year Rainfall=7.00"
0.11
Runoff Area=933 sf
0.1
Runoff Volume=356 cf
0.09
Runoff Depth=4.58"
Flow (cfs)

0.08
Flow Length=28'
0.07
Slope=0.0250 '/'
0.06 Tc=3.1 min
0.05 CN=79
0.04

0.03

0.02

0.01

0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
Time (hours)
345 Oak Drainage Type III 24-hr 100-Year Rainfall=7.00"
Prepared by Grady Consulting, LLC Printed 9/20/2019
HydroCAD® 10.00-21 s/n 09955 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 76

Summary for Reach 8R: ADS Pipe

[52] Hint: Inlet/Outlet conditions not evaluated

[79] Warning: Submerged Pond 2P Primary device # 1 by 0.11'

Inflow Area = 32,389 sf, 65.16% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 2.29" for 100-Year event
Inflow = 0.19 cfs @ 14.97 hrs, Volume= 6,187 cf
Outflow = 0.19 cfs @ 14.98 hrs, Volume= 6,186 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.2 min

Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 0.00-36.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Max. Velocity= 4.79 fps, Min. Travel Time= 0.1 min
Avg. Velocity = 2.98 fps, Avg. Travel Time= 0.2 min

Peak Storage= 1 cf @ 14.98 hrs

Average Depth at Peak Storage= 0.11'
Bank-Full Depth= 0.67' Flow Area= 0.3 sf, Capacity= 2.98 cfs

8.0" Round Pipe

n= 0.012 Corrugated PP, smooth interior
Length= 27.0' Slope= 0.0519 '/'
Inlet Invert= 85.00', Outlet Invert= 83.60'
345 Oak Drainage Type III 24-hr 100-Year Rainfall=7.00"
Prepared by Grady Consulting, LLC Printed 9/20/2019
HydroCAD® 10.00-21 s/n 09955 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 77

Reach 8R: ADS Pipe

Hydrograph

Inflow
0.21 0.19 cfs Outflow
0.2 0.19 cfs Inflow Area=32,389 sf
0.19
0.18 Avg. Flow Depth=0.11'
0.17 Max Vel=4.79 fps
0.16
0.15 8.0"
0.14 Round Pipe
0.13
n=0.012
Flow (cfs)

0.12
0.11 L=27.0'
0.1
0.09 S=0.0519 '/'
0.08 Capacity=2.98 cfs
0.07
0.06
0.05
0.04
0.03
0.02
0.01
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
Time (hours)
345 Oak Drainage Type III 24-hr 100-Year Rainfall=7.00"
Prepared by Grady Consulting, LLC Printed 9/20/2019
HydroCAD® 10.00-21 s/n 09955 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 78

Summary for Pond 0P: Post-Total

[40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow)

Inflow Area = 44,372 sf, 49.70% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 2.96" for 100-Year event
Inflow = 1.50 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 10,939 cf
Primary = 1.50 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 10,939 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min

Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-36.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs

Pond 0P: Post-Total

Hydrograph

Inflow
1.50 cfs Primary
1.50 cfs Inflow Area=44,372 sf

1
Flow (cfs)

0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
Time (hours)
345 Oak Drainage Type III 24-hr 100-Year Rainfall=7.00"
Prepared by Grady Consulting, LLC Printed 9/20/2019
HydroCAD® 10.00-21 s/n 09955 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 79

Summary for Pond 1P: CB1

[40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow)

Inflow Area = 37,602 sf, 56.13% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 2.61" for 100-Year event
Inflow = 0.64 cfs @ 12.11 hrs, Volume= 8,178 cf
Primary = 0.64 cfs @ 12.11 hrs, Volume= 8,178 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min

Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-36.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs

Pond 1P: CB1

Hydrograph

Inflow
0.7 0.64 cfs Primary
0.64 cfs Inflow Area=37,602 sf
0.65

0.6

0.55

0.5

0.45
Flow (cfs)

0.4

0.35

0.3

0.25

0.2

0.15
0.1

0.05

0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
Time (hours)
345 Oak Drainage Type III 24-hr 100-Year Rainfall=7.00"
Prepared by Grady Consulting, LLC Printed 9/20/2019
HydroCAD® 10.00-21 s/n 09955 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 80

Summary for Pond 2P: Pipe Storage

Inflow Area = 32,389 sf, 65.16% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 5.53" for 100-Year event
Inflow = 4.57 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 14,934 cf
Outflow = 0.19 cfs @ 14.97 hrs, Volume= 6,187 cf, Atten= 96%, Lag= 174.8 min
Primary = 0.19 cfs @ 14.97 hrs, Volume= 6,187 cf

Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-36.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs / 3
Peak Elev= 87.73' @ 14.97 hrs Surf.Area= 2,843 sf Storage= 11,054 cf

Plug-Flow detention time= 578.6 min calculated for 6,185 cf (41% of inflow)
Center-of-Mass det. time= 448.9 min ( 1,221.8 - 772.9 )

Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description

#1 85.00' 11,133 cf 36.0" Round RCP_Round 36" x 7
L= 225.0'
#2 85.00' 250 cf 5.00'W x 10.00'L x 5.00'H Tank Housing
#3 85.00' 250 cf 5.00'W x 10.00'L x 5.00'H Tank Housing
#4 85.00' 250 cf 5.00'W x 10.00'L x 5.00'H Tank Housing
11,883 cf Total Available Storage

Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices

#1 Primary 85.00' 1.0" Vert. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600
#2 Primary 87.50' 6.0" Vert. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600

Primary OutFlow Max=0.19 cfs @ 14.97 hrs HW=87.73' (Free Discharge)

1=Orifice/Grate (Orifice Controls 0.04 cfs @ 7.90 fps)
2=Orifice/Grate (Orifice Controls 0.15 cfs @ 1.64 fps)
345 Oak Drainage Type III 24-hr 100-Year Rainfall=7.00"
Prepared by Grady Consulting, LLC Printed 9/20/2019
HydroCAD® 10.00-21 s/n 09955 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 81

Pond 2P: Pipe Storage

Hydrograph

Inflow
5 4.57 cfs Primary
Inflow Area=32,389 sf
Peak Elev=87.73'
4 Storage=11,054 cf

3
Flow (cfs)

0.19 cfs
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
Time (hours)
345 Oak Drainage Type III 24-hr 100-Year Rainfall=7.00"
Prepared by Grady Consulting, LLC Printed 9/20/2019
HydroCAD® 10.00-21 s/n 09955 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 82

Summary for Pond 6P: Pre-Total

[40] Hint: Not Described (Outflow=Inflow)

Inflow Area = 44,370 sf, 19.24% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 4.96" for 100-Year event
Inflow = 5.39 cfs @ 12.11 hrs, Volume= 18,333 cf
Primary = 5.39 cfs @ 12.11 hrs, Volume= 18,333 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min

Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-36.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs

Pond 6P: Pre-Total

Hydrograph

Inflow
6 5.39 cfs Primary
5.39 cfs Inflow Area=44,370 sf
5

4
Flow (cfs)

0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
Time (hours)
345 Oak Drainage Type III 24-hr 100-Year Rainfall=7.00"
Prepared by Grady Consulting, LLC Printed 9/20/2019
HydroCAD® 10.00-21 s/n 09955 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 83

Summary for Pond 10P: Basin

Inflow Area = 4,400 sf, 54.55% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 5.71" for 100-Year event
Inflow = 0.78 cfs @ 12.00 hrs, Volume= 2,093 cf
Outflow = 0.24 cfs @ 12.24 hrs, Volume= 1,716 cf, Atten= 70%, Lag= 14.2 min
Discarded = 0.01 cfs @ 12.24 hrs, Volume= 904 cf
Primary = 0.23 cfs @ 12.24 hrs, Volume= 812 cf

Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-36.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs
Peak Elev= 97.70' @ 12.24 hrs Surf.Area= 1,480 sf Storage= 911 cf

Plug-Flow detention time= 345.9 min calculated for 1,715 cf (82% of inflow)
Center-of-Mass det. time= 275.1 min ( 1,052.9 - 777.8 )

Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description

#1 97.00' 1,373 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic)Listed below (Recalc)

Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store

(feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet)
97.00 1,111 0 0
98.00 1,635 1,373 1,373

Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices

#1 Discarded 97.00' 0.270 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area
#2 Primary 97.60' 8.0" Horiz. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600
Limited to weir flow at low heads

Discarded OutFlow Max=0.01 cfs @ 12.24 hrs HW=97.70' (Free Discharge)

1=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.01 cfs)

Primary OutFlow Max=0.23 cfs @ 12.24 hrs HW=97.70' (Free Discharge)

2=Orifice/Grate (Weir Controls 0.23 cfs @ 1.05 fps)
345 Oak Drainage Type III 24-hr 100-Year Rainfall=7.00"
Prepared by Grady Consulting, LLC Printed 9/20/2019
HydroCAD® 10.00-21 s/n 09955 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 84

Pond 10P: Basin

Hydrograph

Inflow
0.78 cfs Outflow
Inflow Area=4,400 sf Discarded
Primary
0.85
0.8
Peak Elev=97.70'
0.75 Storage=911 cf
0.7
0.65
0.6
0.55
Flow (cfs)

0.5
0.45
0.4
0.35 0.24 cfs
0.3
0.25
0.23 cfs
0.2
0.15
0.1 0.01 cfs
0.05
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
Time (hours)
 Section II
Stormwater Management
♦ STANDARD #1 No New Stormwater Conveyances
The proposed development proposes no new stormwater conveyances that discharge untreated
stormwater off-site or cause down gradient erosion.

♦ STANDARD #2 Post Development Peak Discharge

The overall site analysis demonstrates that the stormwater management system has been designed so
that the post-development peak discharge rates do not exceed the pre-development discharge rate for
the 2yr, 10 yr, 25yr & 100 yr 24 hr storm events.

♦ STANDARD #3 RECHARGE TO GROUNDWATER

High groundwater and poor soils restrict the feasibility of onsite infiltration of stormwater. This
project is for the redevelopment of an existing dwelling and proposes to reduce peak flows from the 2,
10, 25, and 100 year storm events. This project proposes to recharge stormwater from new
development.

Total proposed site impervious area = 22,500 square feet (sf)

Total existing site impervious area = 8,538 sf
Total new development site impervious area = 22,500 – 8,538 = 13,962 sf

13,962 sf (C-soils) x ¼” x 1’/12” = 291 cubic feet (cf)

Drawdown Within 72 Hours

Storage volume below outlet = 830 cf
Time = (830 cf) / (0.27”/hr x 1’/12” x 1,133 sf) = 33 hours < 72 hours

♦ STANDARD #4 WATER QUALITY

High groundwater and poor soils restrict the feasibility of onsite infiltration of stormwater. This
project is for the redevelopment of an existing dwelling and proposes to reduce peak flows from the 2,
10, 25, and 100 year storm events. This project proposes to treat stormwater from new development.

BASIN

Required water quality volume

Vwq = 0.5” x 1’/12” x 13,962 sf = 582 cf

Total Proposed
Retained volume below Nyloplast yard drain emergency outlet = 798 cf

For Contech CDS 1515-3, see attached calculations from Contech.

♦ TSS REMOVAL (see TSS Removal Work Sheet)

 V
INSTRUCTIONS: Version 1, Automated: Mar. 4, 2008
1. In BMP Column, click on Blue Cell to Activate Drop Down Menu
2. Select BMP from Drop Down Menu
3. After BMP is selected, TSS Removal and other Columns are automatically completed.
Location: 345 Oak Street, Pembroke
B C D E F
TSS Removal Starting TSS Amount Remaining
BMP1 Rate1 Load* Removed (C*D) Load (D-E)
Calculation Worksheet

Infiltration Basin 0.80 1.00 0.80 0.20

TSS Removal

0.00 0.20 0.00 0.20

0.00 0.20 0.00 0.20
0.00 0.20 0.00 0.20
0.00 0.20 0.00 0.20
Separate Form Needs to
be Completed for Each
Total TSS Removal = 80% Outlet or BMP Train
Project: 18-365
Prepared By: BK *Equals remaining load from previous BMP (E)
Date: 8/21/2019 which enters the BMP
Non-automated TSS Calculation Sheet
must be used if Proprietary BMP Proposed
1. From MassDEP Stormwater Handbook Vol. 1 Mass. Dept. of Environmental Protection
Project: 345 Oak St
Location: Pembroke, MA
Prepared For: Grady Consulting / Brendan King

Purpose: To calculate the water quality flow rate (WQF) over a given site area. In this situation the WQF is
derived from the first 1" of runoff from the contributing impervious surface.

Reference: Massachusetts Dept. of Environmental Protection Wetlands Program / United States Department of
Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service TR-55 Manual

Procedure: Determine unit peak discharge using Figure 1 or 2. Figure 2 is in tabular form so is preferred. Using
the tc, read the unit peak discharge (qu) from Figure 1 or Table in Figure 2. qu is expressed in the
following units: cfs/mi2/watershed inches (csm/in).

Compute Q Rate using the following equation:

Q = (qu) (A) (WQV)

where:
Q = flow rate associated with first 1" of runoff
qu = the unit peak discharge, in csm/in.
A = impervious surface drainage area (in square miles)
WQV = water quality volume in watershed inches (1" in this case)

Structure Impv. A tc tc WQV

qu (csm/in.) Q (cfs)
Name (acres) (miles2) (min) (hr) (in)
WQS 1 0.48 0.0007500 5.0 0.083 1.00 795.00 0.60
 CDS ESTIMATED NET ANNUAL SOLIDS LOAD REDUCTION
BASED ON THE RATIONAL RAINFALL METHOD
BASED ON AN AVERAGE PARTICLE SIZE OF 50 MICRONS
345 OAK ST
PEMBROKE, MA

Area 0.48 ac Unit Site Designation WQS 1

Weighted C 0.9 Rainfall Station # 68
tc 5 min Particle size 0
CDS Model 1515-3 CDS Treatment Capacity 1.0 cfs
CDS Hydraulic Capacity
cfs

Rainfall
Percent Rainfall Cumulative Total Flowrate Treated Flowrate Incremental
Intensity1
Volume1 Rainfall Volume (cfs) (cfs) Removal (%)
(in/hr)
0.02 9.3% 9.3% 0.01 0.01 9.0
0.04 9.5% 18.8% 0.02 0.02 9.1
0.06 8.7% 27.5% 0.03 0.03 8.3
0.08 10.1% 37.6% 0.03 0.03 9.6
0.10 7.2% 44.8% 0.04 0.04 6.8
0.12 6.0% 50.8% 0.05 0.05 5.6
0.14 6.3% 57.1% 0.06 0.06 5.9
0.16 5.6% 62.7% 0.07 0.07 5.2
0.18 4.7% 67.4% 0.08 0.08 4.3
0.20 3.6% 71.0% 0.09 0.09 3.3
0.25 8.2% 79.1% 0.11 0.11 7.3
0.50 14.9% 94.0% 0.22 0.22 12.3
0.75 3.2% 97.3% 0.32 0.32 2.4
1.00 1.2% 98.5% 0.43 0.43 0.8
1.50 0.7% 99.2% 0.65 0.65 0.4
2.00 0.8% 100.0% 0.86 0.86 0.3
0.00 0.0% 100.0% 0.00 0.00 0.0
0.00 0.0% 100.0% 0.00 0.00 0.0
0.00 0.0% 100.0% 0.00 0.00 0.0
0.00 0.0% 100.0% 0.00 0.00 0.0
0.00 0.0% 100.0% 0.00 0.00 0.0
90.6
Removal Efficiency Adjustment2 = 6.5%
Predicted % Annual Rainfall Treated = 93.5%
Predicted Net Annual Load Removal Efficiency = 84.2%
1 - Based on 10 years of rainfall data from NCDC station 736, Blue Hill, Norfolk County, MA
2 - Reduction due to use of 60-minute data for a site that has a time of concentration less than 30-minutes.
 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands Program

Checklist for Stormwater Report

A. Introduction
Important: When A Stormwater Report must be submitted with the Notice of Intent permit application to document
filling out forms
compliance with the Stormwater Management Standards. The following checklist is NOT a substitute for
on the computer,
use only the tab the Stormwater Report (which should provide more substantive and detailed information) but is offered
key to move your here as a tool to help the applicant organize their Stormwater Management documentation for their
cursor - do not Report and for the reviewer to assess this information in a consistent format. As noted in the Checklist,
use the return
the Stormwater Report must contain the engineering computations and supporting information set forth in
key.
Volume 3 of the Massachusetts Stormwater Handbook. The Stormwater Report must be prepared and
certified by a Registered Professional Engineer (RPE) licensed in the Commonwealth.

The Stormwater Report must include:

 The Stormwater Checklist completed and stamped by a Registered Professional Engineer (see
page 2) that certifies that the Stormwater Report contains all required submittals.1 This Checklist
is to be used as the cover for the completed Stormwater Report.
 Applicant/Project Name
 Project Address
 Name of Firm and Registered Professional Engineer that prepared the Report
 Long-Term Pollution Prevention Plan required by Standards 4-6
 Construction Period Pollution Prevention and Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan required
by Standard 82
 Operation and Maintenance Plan required by Standard 9

In addition to all plans and supporting information, the Stormwater Report must include a brief narrative
describing stormwater management practices, including environmentally sensitive site design and LID
techniques, along with a diagram depicting runoff through the proposed BMP treatment train. Plans are
required to show existing and proposed conditions, identify all wetland resource areas, NRCS soil types,
critical areas, Land Uses with Higher Potential Pollutant Loads (LUHPPL), and any areas on the site
where infiltration rate is greater than 2.4 inches per hour. The Plans shall identify the drainage areas for
both existing and proposed conditions at a scale that enables verification of supporting calculations.

As noted in the Checklist, the Stormwater Management Report shall document compliance with each of
the Stormwater Management Standards as provided in the Massachusetts Stormwater Handbook. The
soils evaluation and calculations shall be done using the methodologies set forth in Volume 3 of the
Massachusetts Stormwater Handbook.

To ensure that the Stormwater Report is complete, applicants are required to fill in the Stormwater Report
Checklist by checking the box to indicate that the specified information has been included in the
Stormwater Report. If any of the information specified in the checklist has not been submitted, the
applicant must provide an explanation. The completed Stormwater Report Checklist and Certification
must be submitted with the Stormwater Report.

1
The Stormwater Report may also include the Illicit Discharge Compliance Statement required by Standard 10. If not included in
the Stormwater Report, the Illicit Discharge Compliance Statement must be submitted prior to the discharge of stormwater runoff to
the post-construction best management practices.
2
For some complex projects, it may not be possible to include the Construction Period Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan in
the Stormwater Report. In that event, the issuing authority has the discretion to issue an Order of Conditions that approves the
project and includes a condition requiring the proponent to submit the Construction Period Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan
before commencing any land disturbance activity on the site.

swcheck.doc • 04/01/08 Stormwater Report Checklist • Page 1 of 8

 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands Program

Checklist for Stormwater Report

B. Stormwater Checklist and Certification
The following checklist is intended to serve as a guide for applicants as to the elements that ordinarily
need to be addressed in a complete Stormwater Report. The checklist is also intended to provide
conservation commissions and other reviewing authorities with a summary of the components necessary
for a comprehensive Stormwater Report that addresses the ten Stormwater Standards.

Note: Because stormwater requirements vary from project to project, it is possible that a complete
Stormwater Report may not include information on some of the subjects specified in the Checklist. If it is
determined that a specific item does not apply to the project under review, please note that the item is not
applicable (N.A.) and provide the reasons for that determination.

A complete checklist must include the Certification set forth below signed by the Registered Professional
Engineer who prepared the Stormwater Report.

Registered Professional Engineer’s Certification

I have reviewed the Stormwater Report, including the soil evaluation, computations, Long-term Pollution
Prevention Plan, the Construction Period Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan (if included), the Long-
term Post-Construction Operation and Maintenance Plan, the Illicit Discharge Compliance Statement (if
included) and the plans showing the stormwater management system, and have determined that they
have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Stormwater Management Standards as
further elaborated by the Massachusetts Stormwater Handbook. I have also determined that the
information presented in the Stormwater Checklist is accurate and that the information presented in the
Stormwater Report accurately reflects conditions at the site as of the date of this permit application.

Registered Professional Engineer Block and Signature

9/20/2019
Signature and Date

Checklist
Project Type: Is the application for new development, redevelopment, or a mix of new and
redevelopment?
New development

Redevelopment

Mix of New Development and Redevelopment

swcheck.doc • 04/01/08 Stormwater Report Checklist • Page 2 of 8

 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands Program

Checklist for Stormwater Report

Checklist (continued)
LID Measures: Stormwater Standards require LID measures to be considered. Document what
environmentally sensitive design and LID Techniques were considered during the planning and design of
the project:

No disturbance to any Wetland Resource Areas

Site Design Practices (e.g. clustered development, reduced frontage setbacks)

Reduced Impervious Area (Redevelopment Only)

Minimizing disturbance to existing trees and shrubs

LID Site Design Credit Requested:

Credit 1

Credit 2

Credit 3

Use of “country drainage” versus curb and gutter conveyance and pipe

Bioretention Cells (includes Rain Gardens)

Constructed Stormwater Wetlands (includes Gravel Wetlands designs)

Treebox Filter

Water Quality Swale

Grass Channel

Green Roof

Other (describe):

Standard 1: No New Untreated Discharges

No new untreated discharges

Outlets have been designed so there is no erosion or scour to wetlands and waters of the
Commonwealth
Supporting calculations specified in Volume 3 of the Massachusetts Stormwater Handbook included.

swcheck.doc • 04/01/08 Stormwater Report Checklist • Page 3 of 8

 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands Program

Checklist for Stormwater Report

Checklist (continued)
Standard 2: Peak Rate Attenuation
Standard 2 waiver requested because the project is located in land subject to coastal storm flowage
and stormwater discharge is to a wetland subject to coastal flooding.
Evaluation provided to determine whether off-site flooding increases during the 100-year 24-hour
storm.
Calculations provided to show that post-development peak discharge rates do not exceed pre-
development rates for the 2-year and 10-year 24-hour storms. If evaluation shows that off-site
flooding increases during the 100-year 24-hour storm, calculations are also provided to show that
post-development peak discharge rates do not exceed pre-development rates for the 100-year 24-
hour storm.

Standard 3: Recharge

Soil Analysis provided.

Required Recharge Volume calculation provided.

Required Recharge volume reduced through use of the LID site Design Credits.

Sizing the infiltration, BMPs is based on the following method: Check the method used.

Static Simple Dynamic Dynamic Field1

Runoff from all impervious areas at the site discharging to the infiltration BMP.

Runoff from all impervious areas at the site is not discharging to the infiltration BMP and calculations
are provided showing that the drainage area contributing runoff to the infiltration BMPs is sufficient to
generate the required recharge volume.

Recharge BMPs have been sized to infiltrate the Required Recharge Volume.
Recharge BMPs have been sized to infiltrate the Required Recharge Volume only to the maximum
extent practicable for the following reason:
Site is comprised solely of C and D soils and/or bedrock at the land surface

M.G.L. c. 21E sites pursuant to 310 CMR 40.0000

Solid Waste Landfill pursuant to 310 CMR 19.000

Project is otherwise subject to Stormwater Management Standards only to the maximum extent
practicable.
Calculations showing that the infiltration BMPs will drain in 72 hours are provided.

Property includes a M.G.L. c. 21E site or a solid waste landfill and a mounding analysis is included.

1
80% TSS removal is required prior to discharge to infiltration BMP if Dynamic Field method is used.

swcheck.doc • 04/01/08 Stormwater Report Checklist • Page 4 of 8

 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands Program

Checklist for Stormwater Report

Checklist (continued)
Standard 3: Recharge (continued)

The infiltration BMP is used to attenuate peak flows during storms greater than or equal to the 10-
year 24-hour storm and separation to seasonal high groundwater is less than 4 feet and a mounding
analysis is provided.
Documentation is provided showing that infiltration BMPs do not adversely impact nearby wetland
resource areas.
Standard 4: Water Quality

The Long-Term Pollution Prevention Plan typically includes the following:

 Good housekeeping practices;
 Provisions for storing materials and waste products inside or under cover;
 Vehicle washing controls;
 Requirements for routine inspections and maintenance of stormwater BMPs;
 Spill prevention and response plans;
 Provisions for maintenance of lawns, gardens, and other landscaped areas;
 Requirements for storage and use of fertilizers, herbicides, and pesticides;
 Pet waste management provisions;
 Provisions for operation and management of septic systems;
 Provisions for solid waste management;
 Snow disposal and plowing plans relative to Wetland Resource Areas;
 Winter Road Salt and/or Sand Use and Storage restrictions;
 Street sweeping schedules;
 Provisions for prevention of illicit discharges to the stormwater management system;
 Documentation that Stormwater BMPs are designed to provide for shutdown and containment in the
event of a spill or discharges to or near critical areas or from LUHPPL;
 Training for staff or personnel involved with implementing Long-Term Pollution Prevention Plan;
 List of Emergency contacts for implementing Long-Term Pollution Prevention Plan.
A Long-Term Pollution Prevention Plan is attached to Stormwater Report and is included as an
attachment to the Wetlands Notice of Intent.
Treatment BMPs subject to the 44% TSS removal pretreatment requirement and the one inch rule for
calculating the water quality volume are included, and discharge:
is within the Zone II or Interim Wellhead Protection Area

is near or to other critical areas

is within soils with a rapid infiltration rate (greater than 2.4 inches per hour)

involves runoff from land uses with higher potential pollutant loads.

The Required Water Quality Volume is reduced through use of the LID site Design Credits.
Calculations documenting that the treatment train meets the 80% TSS removal requirement and, if
applicable, the 44% TSS removal pretreatment requirement, are provided.

swcheck.doc • 04/01/08 Stormwater Report Checklist • Page 5 of 8

 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands Program

Checklist for Stormwater Report

Checklist (continued)
Standard 4: Water Quality (continued)

The BMP is sized (and calculations provided) based on:

The ½” or 1” Water Quality Volume or

The equivalent flow rate associated with the Water Quality Volume and documentation is
provided showing that the BMP treats the required water quality volume.
The applicant proposes to use proprietary BMPs, and documentation supporting use of proprietary
BMP and proposed TSS removal rate is provided. This documentation may be in the form of the
propriety BMP checklist found in Volume 2, Chapter 4 of the Massachusetts Stormwater Handbook
and submitting copies of the TARP Report, STEP Report, and/or other third party studies verifying
performance of the proprietary BMPs.
A TMDL exists that indicates a need to reduce pollutants other than TSS and documentation showing
that the BMPs selected are consistent with the TMDL is provided.
Standard 5: Land Uses With Higher Potential Pollutant Loads (LUHPPLs)
The NPDES Multi-Sector General Permit covers the land use and the Stormwater Pollution
Prevention Plan (SWPPP) has been included with the Stormwater Report.
The NPDES Multi-Sector General Permit covers the land use and the SWPPP will be submitted prior
to the discharge of stormwater to the post-construction stormwater BMPs.
The NPDES Multi-Sector General Permit does not cover the land use.

LUHPPLs are located at the site and industry specific source control and pollution prevention
measures have been proposed to reduce or eliminate the exposure of LUHPPLs to rain, snow, snow
melt and runoff, and been included in the long term Pollution Prevention Plan.

All exposure has been eliminated.

All exposure has not been eliminated and all BMPs selected are on MassDEP LUHPPL list.

The LUHPPL has the potential to generate runoff with moderate to higher concentrations of oil and
grease (e.g. all parking lots with >1000 vehicle trips per day) and the treatment train includes an oil
grit separator, a filtering bioretention area, a sand filter or equivalent.

Standard 6: Critical Areas

The discharge is near or to a critical area and the treatment train includes only BMPs that MassDEP
has approved for stormwater discharges to or near that particular class of critical area.
Critical areas and BMPs are identified in the Stormwater Report.

swcheck.doc • 04/01/08 Stormwater Report Checklist • Page 6 of 8

 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands Program

Checklist for Stormwater Report

Checklist (continued)
Standard 7: Redevelopments and Other Projects Subject to the Standards only to the maximum
extent practicable
The project is subject to the Stormwater Management Standards only to the maximum Extent
Practicable as a:
Limited Project
Small Residential Projects: 5-9 single family houses or 5-9 units in a multi-family development
provided there is no discharge that may potentially affect a critical area.
Small Residential Projects: 2-4 single family houses or 2-4 units in a multi-family development
with a discharge to a critical area
Marina and/or boatyard provided the hull painting, service and maintenance areas are protected
from exposure to rain, snow, snow melt and runoff
Bike Path and/or Foot Path

Redevelopment Project

Redevelopment portion of mix of new and redevelopment.

Certain standards are not fully met (Standard No. 1, 8, 9, and 10 must always be fully met) and an
explanation of why these standards are not met is contained in the Stormwater Report.
The project involves redevelopment and a description of all measures that have been taken to
improve existing conditions is provided in the Stormwater Report. The redevelopment checklist found
in Volume 2 Chapter 3 of the Massachusetts Stormwater Handbook may be used to document that
the proposed stormwater management system (a) complies with Standards 2, 3 and the pretreatment
and structural BMP requirements of Standards 4-6 to the maximum extent practicable and (b)
improves existing conditions.
Standard 8: Construction Period Pollution Prevention and Erosion and Sedimentation Control

A Construction Period Pollution Prevention and Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan must include the
following information:

 Narrative;
 Construction Period Operation and Maintenance Plan;
 Names of Persons or Entity Responsible for Plan Compliance;
 Construction Period Pollution Prevention Measures;
 Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan Drawings;
 Detail drawings and specifications for erosion control BMPs, including sizing calculations;
 Vegetation Planning;
 Site Development Plan;
 Construction Sequencing Plan;
 Sequencing of Erosion and Sedimentation Controls;
 Operation and Maintenance of Erosion and Sedimentation Controls;
 Inspection Schedule;
 Maintenance Schedule;
 Inspection and Maintenance Log Form.
A Construction Period Pollution Prevention and Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan containing
the information set forth above has been included in the Stormwater Report.

swcheck.doc • 04/01/08 Stormwater Report Checklist • Page 7 of 8

 Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands Program

Checklist for Stormwater Report

Checklist (continued)
Standard 8: Construction Period Pollution Prevention and Erosion and Sedimentation Control
(continued)
The project is highly complex and information is included in the Stormwater Report that explains why
it is not possible to submit the Construction Period Pollution Prevention and Erosion and
Sedimentation Control Plan with the application. A Construction Period Pollution Prevention and
Erosion and Sedimentation Control has not been included in the Stormwater Report but will be
submitted before land disturbance begins.

The project is not covered by a NPDES Construction General Permit.

The project is covered by a NPDES Construction General Permit and a copy of the SWPPP is in the
Stormwater Report.
The project is covered by a NPDES Construction General Permit but no SWPPP been submitted.
The SWPPP will be submitted BEFORE land disturbance begins.
Standard 9: Operation and Maintenance Plan
The Post Construction Operation and Maintenance Plan is included in the Stormwater Report and
includes the following information:
Name of the stormwater management system owners;

Party responsible for operation and maintenance;

Schedule for implementation of routine and non-routine maintenance tasks;

Plan showing the location of all stormwater BMPs maintenance access areas;

Description and delineation of public safety features;

Estimated operation and maintenance budget; and

Operation and Maintenance Log Form.

The responsible party is not the owner of the parcel where the BMP is located and the Stormwater
Report includes the following submissions:
A copy of the legal instrument (deed, homeowner’s association, utility trust or other legal entity)
that establishes the terms of and legal responsibility for the operation and maintenance of the
project site stormwater BMPs;
A plan and easement deed that allows site access for the legal entity to operate and maintain
BMP functions.
Standard 10: Prohibition of Illicit Discharges

The Long-Term Pollution Prevention Plan includes measures to prevent illicit discharges;

An Illicit Discharge Compliance Statement is attached;

NO Illicit Discharge Compliance Statement is attached but will be submitted prior to the discharge of
any stormwater to post-construction BMPs.

swcheck.doc • 04/01/08 Stormwater Report Checklist • Page 8 of 8

 Section III

Operation & Maintenance

 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN

PROPOSED SITE WORK – DURING CONSTRUCTION

345 Oak Street, Assessors Map F15-38
Pembroke, Massachusetts
Owner:
Champion Builders Inc.
P.O. Box #1414
Duxbury, MA 02331
Contact: (781) 585-4114 Email: [email protected]
Party Responsible for Operation and Maintenance:
Champion Builders Inc.
P.O. Box #1414
Duxbury, MA 02331
Contact: (781) 585-4114 Email: [email protected]

Source of Funding:
Operation and Maintenance of this stormwater management system will be the responsibility
of the property owner to include its successor and/or assigns, as the same may appear on record
with the appropriate register of deeds.

During Construction:
Construction activities shall follow the Construction Sequence shown on the approved plans.
During periods of active construction the stormwater management system shall be inspected on a
weekly basis and within 24 hours of a storm event of greater than ½”. Maintenance tasks shall be
performed monthly or after significant rainfall events of 1” of rain or greater. During construction,
silt-laden runoff shall be prevented from entering the drainage system and off-site properties.
Temporary swales shall be constructed as needed during construction to direct runoff to sediment
traps. Infiltration systems and subsurface storage systems shall not be placed in service until after
the installation of base course pavement and vegetative stabilization of the areas contributing to the
systems.
During dewatering operations, all water pumped from the dewatering shall be directed to a “dirt
bag” pumped sediment removal system (or approved equal) as manufactured by ACF
Environmental. Water from construction dewatering activities should not be directed into any of
the existing or proposed stormwater management facilities system unless it is fully treated prior to
discharge. The unit shall be placed on a crushed stone blanket. Disposal of such “dirt bag” shall
occur when the device is full and can no longer effectively filter sediment or allow water to pass at
a reasonable flow rate. Disposal of this unit shall be the responsibility of the contractor and shall
be as directed by the owner in accordance with applicable local, state, and federal guidelines and
regulations.

All erosion and sedimentation control measures shall be in place prior to the commencement of
any site work or earthwork operations, and shall be maintained during construction, and shall
remain in place until all site work is complete and ground cover is established.
2019-05-3
All exposed soils not to be paved shall be stabilized as soon as practical. Seed mixes shall only be
applied during appropriate periods as recommended by the seed supplier, typically May 1 to
October 15. Any exposed soils that cannot be stabilized by vegetation during these dates shall be
stabilized with hay bales, hay mulch, check dams, jute netting or other acceptable means.
 Once each structure is in place, it should be maintained in accordance with the procedures
described in the post-construction Operations and Maintenance Plan.

During dry periods where dust is created by construction activities the following control measures
should be implemented.
 Sprinkling – The contractor may sprinkle the ground along haul roads and traffic areas until
moist.
 Vegetative cover – Areas that are not expected to be disturbed regularly may be stabilized
with vegetative cover.
 Mulch – Mulching can be used as a quick and effective means of dust control in recently
disturbed areas.
 Spray on chemical soil treatments may be utilized. Application rates shall conform to
manufacturers recommendations.

Illicit Discharges

Illicit discharges to the stormwater management system are discharges that are not entirely
comprised of stormwater. Illicit discharges are prohibited from the stormwater management
system and the stormwater management system shall be inspected for illicit discharges annually.
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES
INSPECTION SCHEDULE AND EVALUATION CHECKLIST – CONSTRUCTION PHASE

PROJECT LOCATION: 345 Oak Street, Pembroke Latest Revision: May 30, 2019

Stormwater Control Manager: Stamp

Best Inspection Date Inspector Minimum Cleaning/ Date of Performed Water Level
Management Frequency Inspected Maintenance and Repair Cleaning/Repair By in
Practice (1) Key Items to Needed Detention
Check yes/no System
List items
Silt socks & After every
swales and major storm
silt traps event

Dewatering Daily-
Operations during
actual
dewatering
Temporary Daily or as
Construction needed.
Entrance
(1) Refer to the Massachusetts Stormwater Management, Volume Two: Stormwater Technical Handbook for
recommendations regarding frequency for inspection and maintenance of specific BMPs.

Limited or no use of sodium chloride salts, fertilizers or pesticides recommended. Slow release fertilizer recommended.
Other notes:(Include deviations from: Con Com Order of Conditions, PB Approval, Construction Sequence and Approved Plan)
 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN
PROPOSED DRAINAGE SYSTEM – POST CONSTRUCTION
345 Oak Street, Assessors Map F15-38
Pembroke, Massachusetts
Owner:
Champion Builders Inc.
P.O. Box #1414
Duxbury, MA 02331
Contact: (781) 585-4114 Email: [email protected]
Party Responsible for Operation and Maintenance:

After construction is complete the owner will be the party responsible for operation and maintenance
of the drainage system. When the property is conveyed, the new owner will be the party responsible
for operation and maintenance.

Source of Funding:
Operation and Maintenance of this stormwater management system will be the responsibility of the
owner.

Schedule for Inspection and Maintenance:

Outlet Structure
After construction, the outlet structure should be inspected at least once per year to ensure that the
system is operating as intended. If accumulated sediment is observed within the structure it should be
removed as necessary. Any sediment removed should be disposed of in accordance with Town, State
and Federal Regulations.

The 1” diameter orifice should be kept clear of debris, and should be inspected quarterly to ensure no
blockage exists. Standing water in the storage pipes is an indicator of such a blockage.

Contech CDS Unit

See attached Contech CDS Guide: Operation, Design, Perfomance and Maintenance for information
regarding operation & maintenance.

Illicit Discharges

Illicit discharges to the stormwater management system are discharges that are not entirely
comprised of stormwater. Illicit discharges are prohibited from the stormwater management
system and the stormwater management system shall be inspected for illicit discharges
annually.

This Standard prohibits illicit discharges to stormwater management systems. The stormwater
management system is the system for conveying, treating, and infiltrating stormwater on-site,
including stormwater best management practices and any pipes intended to transport stormwater to the
groundwater, a surface water, or municipal separate storm sewer system. Illicit discharges to the
stormwater management system are discharges that are not entirely comprised of stormwater.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, an illicit discharge does not include discharges from the following
activities or facilities: firefighting, water line flushing, landscape irrigation, uncontaminated
groundwater, potable water sources, foundation drains, air conditioning condensation, footing drains,
individual resident car washing, flows from riparian habitats and wetlands, dechlorinated water from
 swimming pools, water used for street washing and water used to clean residential buildings without
detergents.
For additional information, refer to Performance Standards and Guidelines for Stormwater Management in Massachusetts,
published by the Department of Environmental Protection.

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES

INSPECTION SCHEDULE AND EVALUATION CHECKLIST – POST CONSTRUCTION PHASE

PROJECT LOCATION: 345 Oak Street, Pembroke Latest Revision January 23, 2019
Best Inspection Date Inspector Minimum Cleaning/ Date of Performed Water
Management Frequency Inspected Maintenance Repair Cleaning/ By Level in
Practice (1) and Key Needed Repair Drainage
Items to yes/no System
Check List items
Outlet Once per
Structure year

(1) Refer to the Massachusetts Stormwater Management, Volume Two: Stormwater Technical Handbook for
recommendations regarding frequency for inspection and maintenance of specific BMPs.
(2) records shall be kept for a minimum of three years.

Limited or no use of sodium chloride salts, fertilizers or pesticides recommended. Slow release fertilizer recommended.
Other notes:(Include deviations from: Con Com Order of Conditions, PB Approval, Construction Sequence and Approved Plan)

Stormwater Control Manager: Stamp

<==>ÿ@AB>ÿCDEFGÿHDIJK
 !ÿ#$$%ÿ&'(%ÿ)*+),ÿ-*&./&0ÿ
*1&2ÿ3/24/ÿ*&ÿ2.1ÿ*/5ÿ67$*&$ÿ27ÿ
,225$5ÿ)*+),ÿ-*&./&0ÿ*7$ÿ'/5$7672'/5ÿ
7$+$/+.2/ÿ&8&+$(&ÿ5$&.6/$5ÿ+2ÿ7$(29$ÿ
+7*&,0ÿ5$-7.&0ÿ*/5ÿ)2*7&$ÿ&$5.($/+ÿ
:72(ÿ&+27(4*+$7ÿ7'/2::0ÿ*/5ÿ&$79$ÿ*&ÿ
+$(%27*78ÿ&%.11ÿ)2/+*./($/+ÿ5$9.)$&ÿ
:27ÿ:12*+*-1$&ÿ&'),ÿ*&ÿ2.1&ÿ*/5ÿ67$*&$&;

L~X|XQÿQfÿeSSQÿT}S€XWX€ÿTQOPMOMT LMNOPQORSTUVSPSWXQTY
\ÿZ2)*+$5ÿ'/5$7672'/50ÿ&2ÿ1.(.+$5ÿ12+ÿ&.[$ÿ.&ÿ
l+*/5*75 #$&)7.%+.2/ /2+ÿ*ÿ5$+$77$/+;
mÿnÿa$*3ÿi124 a729.5$&ÿ/2ÿ%$*3ÿ:124ÿ*++$/'*+.2/ \ÿ^2(%*+.-1$ÿ4.+,ÿ&'-&'7:*)$ÿ&+27(ÿ57*./ÿ
oÿnÿk$),*76$ a729.5$&ÿ/2ÿ672'/54*+$7ÿ7$),*76$ \ÿ&^* 8&+$(&;
/ÿ-$ÿ'&$5ÿ:27ÿ7$+72:.++./6ÿ&(*11ÿ'7-*/ÿ12+&ÿ
pÿnÿqllÿk$(29*1mrsÿqllÿ7$(29*1ÿ)7$5.+ÿ4,$/ÿ 4,$7$ÿ1*76$7ÿ_`a&ÿ*7$ÿ/2+ÿ:$*&.-1$;
'&$5ÿ:27ÿ%7$+7$*+($/+;ÿÿ_$)*'&$ÿ \ ÿa7 29.5$ÿ%7$+7$*+($/+ÿ2:ÿ7'/2::ÿ-$:27$ÿ.+ÿ.&ÿ
2:ÿ+,$.7ÿ1.(.+$5ÿ$::$)+.9$/$&&ÿ*/5ÿ \ÿb*1&..91$8ÿ7*$)5)ÿ$+2&ÿ&2$+5,ÿ$:27ÿ7_`a
5$ &;
ÿ(*./+$/*/)$;
&+27*6$ÿ)*%*).+80ÿ5$$%ÿ&'(%ÿ)*+),ÿ \ÿZ2/6$9.+8ÿ.&ÿ,.6,ÿ4. +,ÿ%72%$7ÿ(*./+$/*/)$;
-*&./&ÿ7$)$.9$ÿ)7$5.+ÿ:27ÿ7$(29./6ÿ
qllÿ2/18ÿ.:ÿ+,$8ÿ*7$ÿ'&$5ÿ:27ÿ
%7$+7$*+($/+ÿ*/5ÿ5$&.6/$5ÿ*&ÿ2::n cX TOMNOPQORSTUdXeXQOQXfPTY
\ÿZ.(.+$5ÿ%211'+*/+ÿ7$(29*1;
1./$ÿ&8&+$(&; \ÿbg%$/&.9$ÿ+2ÿ./&+*11ÿ*/5ÿ(*./+*./0ÿ7$&'1+./6ÿ./ÿ
rÿnÿt.6,$7ÿ k$)2(($/5$5ÿ*&ÿ%7$+7$*+($/+ÿ
a211'+*/+ÿ _`a;ÿu1+,2'6,ÿ%729.5$&ÿ&2($ÿ&%.11ÿ \ÿ,h2 .6,ÿ)2&+ÿ%$7ÿ'/.+ÿ*7$*ÿ+7$*+$5;
ÿ*-.1.+8ÿ+2ÿ)2/+721ÿ921'($ÿ2:ÿ&+27(4*+$7
Z2*5./6 )2/+721ÿ)*%*-.1.+80ÿ*ÿ5$$%ÿ&'(%ÿ \ ÿi7 $ j'$/+ÿ(*./+$/*/)$ÿ.&ÿ$&&$/+.*1
)*+),ÿ-*&./ÿ(*8ÿ/2+ÿ-$ÿ'&$5ÿ./ÿ
%1*)$ÿ2:ÿ*/ÿ2.1ÿ67.+ÿ&$%*7*+27ÿ27ÿ&*/5ÿ */5ÿ'2..71$ÿ*&/ÿ%57ÿ26%7$$*7ÿ&5$.&%2&*1ÿ2:ÿ+7*%%$5ÿ&$5.($/+ÿ
\ ÿk$ j
:.1+$7ÿ:27ÿ1*/5ÿ'&$&ÿ+,*+ÿ,*9$ÿ+,$ÿ \ÿb/+7*%($/+ÿ,*[*75ÿ:27ÿ*(%,.-.*/&ÿ*/5ÿ2+,$7ÿ
%2+$/+.*1ÿ+2ÿ6$/$7*+$ÿ7'/2::ÿ4.+,ÿ
,.6,ÿ)2/)$/+7*+.2/&ÿ2:ÿ2.1ÿ*/5ÿ67$*&$ÿ &(*11ÿ*/.(*1&
&'),ÿ*&!ÿ,.6,n./+$/&.+8n'&$ÿ%*73./6ÿ ‚f||ƒQOPQÿ{SefNO|ÿ„WWX€XSP€XST
12+&0ÿ6*&ÿ&+*+.2/&0ÿ:1$$+ÿ&+27*6$ÿ \ÿq2+*1ÿl'&%$/5$5ÿl21.5&ÿqll†ÿnÿmrsÿ:27ÿ
*7$*&0ÿ9$,.)1$ÿ*/5v27ÿ$j'.%($/+ÿ 7$6'1*+278ÿ%'7%2&$&†
(*./+$/*/)$ÿ*/5ÿ&$79.)$ÿ*7$*&;
wÿnÿÿ#.&),*76$&ÿ `*8ÿ-$ÿ'&$5ÿ*&ÿ%7$+7$*+($/+ÿ_`a;ÿÿ h' \ ÿ +7.$/+&ÿh.+726$/0ÿ%,2&%,27'&†ÿnÿ
‡/&'::.).$/+ÿ5*+*
/$*7ÿ27ÿ+2ÿ /2+ÿ*/ÿ*5$j'*+$ÿ&%.11ÿ)2/+721ÿ5$9.)$ÿ \ÿ`$ +*1&ÿ)2%%$70ÿ1$*50ÿ[./)0ÿ)*5(.'(†ÿnÿ
^7.+.)*1ÿu7$*& :27ÿ5.&),*76$&ÿ/$*7ÿ27ÿ+2ÿ)7.+.)*1ÿ ‡/ &' ::.).$/+ÿ5*+*
*7$*&; \ÿa*+,26$/&ÿ)21.:27(0ÿ$ÿ)21.†ÿnÿ‡/&'::.).$/+ÿ
xÿzÿ t.6,18ÿ&'.+*-1$; 5*+*
{SMSNS|f}eSPQ 0123413256ÿ89 ÿÿ63ÿÿÿ512ÿÿÿÿÿ5ÿ
 5U51UÿV2ÿ1ÿWXYZ2Y1[ÿVÿ\]ÿ^5Y2
?@##@#
 !" #
$%&'()*ÿ,%-*& ./,0ÿ*-1(&ÿ'(0ÿ2(30
45(3%ÿ,%-*& ./,0ÿ*-1(&ÿ'(0ÿ2(30ÿ/0ÿ67(%(8(0ÿ*7(ÿ9('*7ÿ/:ÿ
9('/&-*&ÿ-&ÿ;0(3*(0ÿ*73%ÿ/0ÿ(<,35ÿ*/ÿ/%(ÿ735:ÿ
*7(ÿ9('*7ÿ:0/1ÿ*7(ÿ=/**/1ÿ/:ÿ*7(ÿ-%8(0*ÿ/:ÿ*7(ÿ
5/6(&*ÿ'-'(ÿ-%ÿ*7(ÿ=3&-%>

AB @Cÿ @"E
I55ÿ9(('ÿ&,1'ÿ)3*)7ÿ=3&-%&ÿ1,&*ÿ-%)5,9(ÿ7//9&>ÿ./0ÿJ3&&K-;7632ÿ'0/L()*&Mÿ)/%&,5*ÿ*7(ÿN*/0163*(0ÿ
K3%9=//Oÿ:/0ÿK-;7632&ÿ3%9ÿP0-9;(&ÿ:/0ÿ7//9ÿ0(<,-0(1(%*&>
FQ(G9HÿC  #@ 
,)(ÿ$1'(08-/,&ÿN,0:3)(
R-&)/%%()*ÿ0//:*/'ÿ3%9ÿ%/%S0//:*/'ÿ0,%/::
T(;(*3*(9ÿ.-5*(0ÿN*0-'
0123413256ÿ89 ÿÿ63ÿÿÿ512ÿÿÿÿÿ5ÿ
ÿÿ !"#ÿ$%&' 1020G.1.2/ÿA>2/->96Lÿÿ\29./ÿG-0/.6ÿ72678.ÿI0-V72Gÿ
G0-0G.6ÿ0-.ÿA;--.2/9Hÿ-.T;7-.8ÿ/>ÿF0=.ÿ1;AFÿ61099.-ÿ
>I.272G6ÿ/F02ÿ/F>6.ÿ8.6A-7<.8ÿF.-.72Lÿÿ
&!()ÿ*)&"!&+'% E>ÿ-.A.7=.ÿ/F.ÿ[abÿ-.1>=09ÿA-.87/YÿF>>86ÿ1;6/ÿ
3ÿ,-./-.0/1.2/ <.ÿ;6.8ÿ72ÿ8..Iÿ6;1IÿA0/AFÿ<06726Lÿÿÿc>>86ÿ096>ÿ
3ÿ5.678.2/709ÿ6;<87=767>26 F.9IÿA>2/072ÿ>79ÿ6I7996LÿS066c7GFQ0Hÿ10Hÿ726/099ÿ
3ÿ?@@7A. A0/AFÿ<06726ÿQ7/F>;/ÿF>>86ÿI->=78.8ÿ/F.Hÿ0-.ÿ
3ÿ5./079 8.67G2.8YÿA>26/-;A/.8Yÿ>I.-0/.8Yÿ028ÿ1072/072.8ÿ
%&B'ÿ+'%&CD!&+'% 72ÿ0AA>-802A.ÿQ7/Fÿ/F.ÿS066ÿc7GFQ0HÿO/>-1Q0/.-ÿ
3ÿEF.ÿA>2/-7<;/72Gÿ8-0720G.ÿ0-.0ÿ/>ÿ02Hÿ8..Iÿ c028<>>VL
6;1IÿA0/AFÿ<0672ÿ6F>;98ÿ2>/ÿ.JA..8ÿKÿ0A-.ÿ>@ÿ \26/099ÿ/F.ÿQ..IÿF>9.ÿ0<>=.ÿ/F.ÿ>;/9./ÿI7I.Lÿ_.=.-ÿ
71I.-=7>;6ÿA>=.-L
3ÿM.67G2ÿ028ÿA>26/-;A/ÿ8..Iÿ6;1IÿA0/AFÿ<06726ÿ06ÿ 7<206-/-0.999Lÿ/F.ÿQ..IÿF>9.ÿ72ÿ/F.ÿ<>//>1ÿ>@ÿ/F.ÿA0/AFÿ<0672ÿ
>@@N972.ÿ6H6/.16L
3ÿO7P.ÿ/F.ÿ8-0720G.ÿ0-.0ÿ6>ÿ/F0/ÿ/F.ÿ@9>Qÿ-0/.ÿ8>.6ÿ &!ÿ+'%!D&'!%
2>/ÿ.JA..8ÿ/F.ÿA0I0A7/Hÿ>@ÿ/F.ÿ729./ÿG-0/.Lÿ
3ÿM7=.-/ÿ.JA.66ÿ@9>Q6ÿ/>ÿ02>/F.-ÿRS,ÿ72/.28.8ÿ Xÿ I->I>2.2/ÿ10Hÿ2>/ÿ<.ÿ0<9.ÿ/>ÿ726/099ÿ0ÿ8..Iÿ6;1Iÿ
/>ÿ1../ÿ/F.ÿQ0/.-ÿT;02/7/Hÿ-.T;7-.1.2/6ÿUI.0Vÿ 3/ÿAM.
A 0 Fÿ<0672ÿ<.A0;6.ÿ>@d
I/Fÿ/>ÿ<.8->AVe
-0/.ÿ0//.2;0/7>2Wÿ>-ÿ/>ÿ0ÿ6/>-1ÿ8-072ÿ6H6/.1Lÿ
X2ÿ>@@N972.ÿ8.67G2ÿ.2F02A.6ÿI>99;/02/ÿ-.1>=09ÿ 33ÿÿc7 GFÿG->;28Q0/.-e
.@@7A7.2AHYÿ<.A0;6.ÿ7/ÿI-.=.2/6ÿ/F.ÿ-.6;6I.267>2ÿ 3ÿ,- ?/
.6.2A.ÿ>@ÿ;/797/7.6eÿ>-
F.-ÿ67/.ÿA>287/7>26ÿ/F0/ÿ9717/ÿ8.I/Fÿ>@ÿ
>@ÿ6.871.2/6ÿ72ÿ90-G.ÿ6/>-16L .JA0=0/7>2ÿ<.A0;6.ÿ>@ÿ6/0<797/HL
S0V.ÿ/F.ÿ6;1Iÿ8.I/FÿU876/02A.ÿ@->1ÿ/F.ÿ<>//>1ÿ>@ÿ
/F.ÿ>;/9./ÿI7I.ÿ/>ÿ/F.ÿ<>//>1ÿ>@ÿ/F.ÿ<0672Wÿ0/ÿ9.06/ÿ f &'!''"
@>;-ÿ@../ÿ/71.6ÿ/F.ÿ8701./.-ÿ>@ÿ/F.ÿ>;/9./ÿI7I.ÿ028ÿ 5.G;90-ÿ1072/.202A.ÿ76ÿ.66.2/709LÿÿM..Iÿ6;1IÿA0/AFÿ
1>-.ÿ7@ÿ/F.ÿA>2/-7<;/72Gÿ8-0720G.ÿ0-.0ÿF06ÿ0ÿF7GFÿ <06726ÿ-.1072ÿ.@@.A/7=.ÿ0/ÿ-.1>=72GÿI>99;/02/6ÿ>29Hÿ
6.871.2/ÿ9>08LÿEF.ÿ17271;1ÿ6;1Iÿ8.I/Fÿ76ÿZÿ@../Lÿÿ 7@ÿ/F.Hÿ0-.ÿA9.02.8ÿ>;/ÿ@-.T;.2/9HLÿÿ?2.ÿ6/;8Hÿ@>;28ÿ
M>;<9.ÿA0/AFÿ<06726Yÿ/F>6.ÿQ7/Fÿ[ÿ729./ÿG-0/.6Yÿ10Hÿ /F0/ÿ>2A.ÿagbÿ>@ÿ/F.ÿ6;1Iÿ=>9;1.ÿ76ÿ@799.8Yÿ/F.ÿA0/AFÿ
-.T;7-.ÿ8..I.-ÿ6;1I6Lÿ\26/099ÿ/F.ÿ72=.-/ÿ>@ÿ/F.ÿ>;/9./ÿ <0672ÿ76ÿ2>/ÿ0<9.ÿ/>ÿ-./072ÿ0887/7>209ÿ6.871.2/6Lÿÿ
I7I.ÿ0/ÿ9.06/ÿZÿ@../ÿ@->1ÿ/F.ÿ<>//>1ÿ>@ÿ/F.ÿA0/AFÿ<0672ÿ
G-0/.L \26I.A/ÿ>-ÿA9.02ÿ8..Iÿ6;1Iÿ<06726ÿ0/ÿ9.06/ÿ@>;-ÿ/71.6ÿ
I.-ÿH.0-ÿ028ÿ0/ÿ/F.ÿ.28ÿ>@ÿ/F.ÿ@>970G.ÿ028ÿ62>QNÿ
EF.ÿ729./ÿG-0/.ÿ6.-=.6ÿ/>ÿI-.=.2/ÿ90-G.-ÿ8.<-76ÿ@->1ÿ -.1>=09ÿ6.06>26LÿO.871.2/6ÿ1;6/ÿ096>ÿ<.ÿ-.1>=.8ÿ
.2/.-72Gÿ/F.ÿ6;1ILÿÿE>ÿ<.ÿ.@@.A/7=.Yÿ/F.ÿG-0/.ÿ1;6/ÿ @>;-ÿ/71.6ÿI.-ÿH.0-ÿ>-ÿQF.2.=.-ÿ/F.ÿ8.I/Fÿ>@ÿ8.I>67/6ÿ
F0=.ÿ0ÿ6.I0-0/7>2ÿ<./Q..2ÿ/F.ÿG-0/.6ÿ>@ÿ>2.ÿ6T;0-.ÿ 76ÿG-.0/.-ÿ/F02ÿ>-ÿ.T;09ÿ/>ÿ>2.ÿF09@ÿ/F.ÿ8.I/Fÿ@->1ÿ
72AFÿ>-ÿ9.66LÿÿEF.ÿ729./ÿ>I.272G6ÿ1;6/ÿ2>/ÿ099>Qÿ@9>Q6ÿ /F.ÿ<>//>1ÿ>@ÿ/F.ÿ72=.-/ÿ>@ÿ/F.ÿ9>Q.6/ÿI7I.ÿ72ÿ/F.ÿ
G-.0/.-ÿ/F02ÿ]ÿA@6ÿ/>ÿ.2/.-ÿ/F.ÿ8..Iÿ6;1IÿA0/AFÿ<0672Lÿ <0672Lÿ\@ÿF028972Gÿ-;2>@@ÿ@->1ÿ9028ÿ;6.6ÿQ7/FÿF7GF.-ÿ
\@ÿ/F.ÿ729./ÿG-0/.ÿ76ÿ8.67G2.8ÿQ7/Fÿ0ÿA;-<ÿA;/Yÿ/F.ÿ I>/.2/709ÿI>99;/02/ÿ9>086ÿ>-ÿ876AF0-G72Gÿ-;2>@@ÿ2.0-ÿ
G-0/.ÿ1;6/ÿ-.0AFÿ/F.ÿ<0AVÿ>@ÿ/F.ÿA;-<ÿA;/ÿ/>ÿI-.=.2/ÿ >-ÿ/>ÿ0ÿA-7/7A09ÿ0-.0Yÿ1>-.ÿ@-.T;.2/ÿA9.0272Gÿ10Hÿ<.ÿ
<HI06672GLÿÿEF.ÿ729./ÿG-0/.ÿ1;6/ÿ<.ÿA>26/-;A/.8ÿ 2.A.660-HL
>@ÿ0ÿ8;-0<9.ÿ10/.-709ÿ028ÿ@7/ÿ/7GF/9Hÿ72/>ÿ/F.ÿ@-01.ÿ
6>ÿ7/ÿQ>2^/ÿ<.ÿ8769>8G.8ÿ<Hÿ0;/>1><79.ÿ/-0@@7ALÿEF.ÿ ÿ̀9016F.99ÿ<;AV./6ÿ0-.ÿ/HI7A099Hÿ;6.8ÿ/>ÿ-.1>=.ÿ
729./ÿG-0/.ÿ1;6/ÿ2>/ÿ<.ÿQ.98.8ÿ/>ÿ/F.ÿ@-01.ÿ6>ÿ/F0/ÿ 6.871.2/ÿ72ÿS0660AF;6.//6Lÿÿc>Q.=.-Yÿ=0A;;1ÿ
6.871.2/6ÿ10Hÿ<.ÿ.0679Hÿ-.1>=.8LÿÿE>ÿ@0A797/0/.ÿ /-;AV6ÿ0-.ÿ[email protected]<9.Yÿ<.A0;6.ÿ/F.Hÿ-.1>=.ÿ1>-.ÿ
1072/.202A.Yÿ/F.ÿ729./ÿG-0/.ÿ1;6/ÿ<.ÿI90A.8ÿ09>2Gÿ /-0II.8ÿ6.871.2/ÿ028ÿ6;I.-20/02/ÿ/F02ÿA9016F.996Lÿÿ
/F.ÿ->08ÿ6F>;98.-ÿ>-ÿA;-<ÿ972.ÿ-0/F.-ÿ/F02ÿ0ÿ/-0@@7Aÿ h0A;;172Gÿ76ÿ096>ÿ0ÿ6I..87.-ÿI->A.66ÿ028ÿ76ÿ9.66ÿ
902.Lÿÿÿ 97V.9Hÿ/>ÿ620Iÿ/F.ÿA06/ÿ7->2ÿF>>8ÿQ7/F72ÿ/F.ÿ8..Iÿ
6;1IÿA0/AFÿ<0672L
_>/.ÿ/F0/ÿQ7/F72ÿI0-V72GÿG0-0G.6Yÿ/F.ÿO/0/.ÿ,9;1<72Gÿ
`>8.ÿ-.G;90/.6ÿ729./ÿG-0/.6ÿ028ÿ>/F.-ÿ6/>-1Q0/.-ÿ
0123413256ÿ89 ÿÿ63ÿÿÿ512ÿÿÿÿÿ5ÿ
ÿ !"#$%ÿ&'$ÿ($&ÿ(ÿ&'$ÿ&((ÿ$!"!)ÿ#$$*ÿ
+,*ÿ&'ÿ-"!.ÿÿ/$!"!)ÿÿ#$$*ÿ+,*ÿ&'ÿ
-"!ÿ"&'"!ÿÿ%#ÿ"&'ÿ&"0$ÿ&%(("ÿ%ÿ$0$!ÿ"&'"!ÿ
ÿ*%1"!)ÿ&ÿ"ÿ#!)$%+2ÿ!#ÿÿ* "$ÿ#$&"ÿ,ÿ-$ÿ
!$$%ÿ&ÿ($)+%#ÿ %1$%.
&' +)'ÿ&'ÿ-"!ÿ#$-%"ÿ(&$!ÿ !&"!ÿ
 !$!&%&"!ÿ(ÿ"ÿ!#ÿ'3%# +ÿ,&$%"ÿ+'ÿ
ÿ*$&%$+,ÿ'#%%- !ÿ!#ÿ,$&2ÿ4567ÿ
"("$ÿ&'$,ÿÿ"#ÿ&$.ÿÿ8!$ÿ&'$%$ÿ"ÿ
$0"#$!$ÿ&'&ÿ&'$ÿ'0$ÿ-$$!ÿ !&,"!&$#ÿ-ÿÿ
*"ÿ%ÿ&'$%ÿ,$!2ÿÿ4567ÿ# $ÿ! &ÿ%+&"!$ÿ
%$9+"%$ÿ&'ÿ-"!ÿ$!"!)ÿ&ÿ-$ÿ&$&$#ÿ-$(%$ÿ
#"* .ÿ/ !&,"!&$#ÿ&'ÿ-"!ÿ$!"!)ÿ,+&ÿ
-$ÿ$0+&$#ÿ"!ÿ %#!$ÿ"&'ÿ&'$ÿ:3%# +ÿ
;&$ÿ<$)+&"!2ÿ=>?ÿ/4<ÿ=?.???2ÿ!#ÿ'!#$#ÿÿ
'3%# +ÿ&$.ÿÿ
@!ÿ&'$ÿ-$!$ÿ(ÿ$0"#$!$ÿ(ÿ !&,"!&"!2ÿ&'ÿ
-"!ÿ$!"!)ÿ,ÿ-$ÿ&1$!ÿ&ÿÿ!#("ÿ%ÿ&'$%ÿ
(""&ÿ*$%,"&&$#ÿ-ÿ4567ÿ&ÿ$*&ÿ"#ÿ&$2ÿ
"&' +&ÿ!ÿ*%"%ÿ**%0ÿ-ÿ4567.ÿÿ: $0$%2ÿ
,$ÿ!#("ÿ%$9+"%$ÿ&'ÿ-"!ÿ$!"!)ÿ&ÿ-$ÿ
&$&$#ÿ-$(%$ÿ&'$ÿ%$ÿ$*&$#.
;"&'ÿ*%"%ÿ4567ÿ**%02ÿ&'ÿ-"!ÿ$!"!)ÿ
,ÿ-$ÿ+$#ÿÿ)%#"!)ÿ!#ÿ'*"!)ÿ,&$%"ÿ&ÿ
!#("ÿ+!#$%) "!)ÿ+%$ÿA$$ÿ<$0"$#ÿB+"#$"!$ÿ
(%ÿ5$&$%,"!"!)ÿ/+%$ÿ&"0"&"$ÿ&ÿ@!&"0$ÿ
8!"!$#ÿC!#("ÿD"&$Eÿ%ÿÿ#"ÿ 0$%ÿ&ÿ&"0$ÿ
!#(".ÿÿÿÿ4567ÿÿ$! +%)$ÿ&'$ÿ-$!$(""ÿ
%$+$ÿ(ÿ&'ÿ-"!ÿ$!"!)ÿ'$!$0$%ÿ* "-$.ÿÿÿ
F$!$(""ÿ<$+$ÿ5$&$%,"!&"!ÿ"ÿ%$9+"%$#ÿ(%ÿ+'ÿ
+$.ÿÿ
4567ÿ%$)+&"!ÿ*%'"-"&ÿ!#("ÿ(%,ÿ$*&"!)ÿ
,&$%"ÿ&'&ÿ !&"!ÿ(%$$G#%"!"!)ÿ"9+"#.ÿÿH!$ÿ
ÿ&ÿ%$, 0$ÿ"9+"#ÿ"ÿ&ÿ+$ÿÿ'#%+"ÿ"(&ÿ&%+1ÿ
#+%"!)ÿ$!"!)ÿ*$%&"!ÿÿ&'&ÿ&'$ÿ,&$%"ÿ!ÿ
-$ÿ#$!&$#ÿ&ÿ&'$ÿ"&$.ÿÿ(&$%ÿ#"!)ÿ,&$%"ÿ(%,ÿ
$0$%ÿ&'ÿ-"!ÿ"!&ÿÿ&%+12ÿ$$0&$ÿ&'$ÿ&%+1ÿ
ÿ&'&ÿ!ÿ(%$$G#%"!"!)ÿ"9+"#ÿ!ÿ(ÿ-1ÿ"!&ÿ
&'$ÿ&%+&+%$.ÿÿ@(ÿ&'$%$ÿ"ÿ! ÿ(%$$ÿ&$%ÿ"!ÿ&'$ÿ&%+12ÿ
&'$ÿ,&$%"ÿ,ÿ-$ÿ#$$,$#ÿ&ÿ-$ÿ+((""$!&ÿ#%.ÿÿ
H&'$%"$ÿ&'$ÿ&'ÿ-"!ÿ$!"!)ÿ,+&ÿ+!#$%) ÿÿ
7"!&ÿI"&$%ÿC"9+"#ÿJ$&.ÿÿB ÿ&ÿ.ÿ4.) 0K#$*K
%$$KK(&.# ÿ(%ÿ"!(%,&"!ÿ!ÿÿ(ÿ&'$ÿ
4567ÿ%$9+"%$,$!&ÿ*$%&"!"!)ÿ&ÿ&'$ÿ#"* ÿ(ÿ
&'ÿ-"!ÿ$!"!).

0123413256ÿ89 ÿÿ63ÿÿÿ512ÿÿÿÿÿ5ÿ
ENGINEERED SOLUTIONS

CDS Guide
Operation, Design, Performance and Maintenance
CDS® Design Basics
Using patented continuous deflective separation technology, the There are three primary methods of sizing a CDS system. The
CDS system screens, separates and traps debris, sediment, and Water Quality Flow Rate Method determines which model size
oil and grease from stormwater runoff. The indirect screening provides the desired removal efficiency at a given flow rate for a
capability of the system allows for 100% removal of floatables defined particle size. The Rational Rainfall Method™ or the and
and neutrally buoyant material without blinding. Flow and Probabilistic Method is used when a specific removal efficiency of
screening controls physically separate captured solids, and the net annual sediment load is required.
minimize the re-suspension and release of previously trapped
Typically in the Unites States, CDS systems are designed to
pollutants. Inline units can treat up to 6 cfs, and internally bypass
achieve an 80% annual solids load reduction based on lab
flows in excess of 50 cfs (1416 L/s). Available precast or cast-in-
generated performance curves for a gradation with an average
place, offline units can treat flows from 1 to 300 cfs (28.3 to
particle size (d50) of 125 microns (μm). For some regulatory
8495 L/s). The pollutant removal capacity of the CDS system has
environments, CDS systems can also be designed to achieve an
been proven in lab and field testing.
80% annual solids load reduction based on an average particle
size (d50) of 75 microns (μm) or 50 microns (µm).
Operation Overview
Stormwater enters the diversion chamber where the diversion Water Quality Flow Rate Method
weir guides the flow into the unit’s separation chamber and In some cases, regulations require that a specific treatment rate,
pollutants are removed from the flow. All flows up to the often referred to as the water quality design flow (WQQ), be
system’s treatment design capacity enter the separation chamber treated. This WQQ represents the peak flow rate from either
and are treated. an event with a specific recurrence interval, e.g. the six-month
storm, or a water quality depth, e.g. 1/2-inch (13 mm) of
Swirl concentration and screen deflection force floatables and
rainfall.
solids to the center of the separation chamber where 100% of
floatables and neutrally buoyant debris larger than the screen The CDS is designed to treat all flows up to the WQQ. At influent
apertures are trapped. rates higher than the WQQ, the diversion weir will direct most
flow exceeding the WQQ around the separation chamber. This
Stormwater then moves through the separation screen, under
allows removal efficiency to remain relatively constant in the
the oil baffle and exits the system. The separation screen remains
separation chamber and eliminates the risk of washout during
clog free due to continuous deflection.
bypass flows regardless of influent flow rates.
During the flow events exceeding the treatment design capacity,
Treatment flow rates are defined as the rate at which the CDS
the diversion weir bypasses excessive flows around the separation
will remove a specific gradation of sediment at a specific removal
chamber, so captured pollutants are retained in the separation
efficiency. Therefore the treatment flow rate is variable, based
cylinder.
on the gradation and removal efficiency specified by the design
engineer.

GRATE INLET Rational Rainfall Method™

CLEAN OUT (CAST IRON HOOD FOR
(REQUIRED) CURB INLET OPENING) Differences in local climate, topography and scale make every
site hydraulically unique. It is important to take these factors into
DEFLECTION PAN, 3 SIDED consideration when estimating the long-term performance of
(GRATE INLET DESIGN)
any stormwater treatment system. The Rational Rainfall Method
CREST OF BYPASS WEIR
(ONE EACH SIDE) combines site-specific information with laboratory generated
SEPARATION CYLINDER
performance data, and local historical precipitation records to
estimate removal efficiencies as accurately as possible.
INLET FLUME
Short duration rain gauge records from across the United States
and Canada were analyzed to determine the percent of the total
annual rainfall that fell at a range of intensities. US stations’
depths were totaled every 15 minutes, or hourly, and recorded in
INLET
(MULTIPLE PIPES POSSIBLE)
0.01-inch increments. Depths were recorded hourly with 1-mm
OIL BAFFLE
resolution at Canadian stations. One trend was consistent at
OUTLET
all sites; the vast majority of precipitation fell at low intensities
TREATMENT SCREEN
and high intensity storms contributed relatively little to the total
annual depth.
SEPARATION SLAB SUMP STORAGE

These intensities, along with the total drainage area and runoff
coefficient for each specific site, are translated into flow rates
using the Rational Rainfall Method. Since most sites are relatively
small and highly impervious, the Rational Rainfall Method is
appropriate. Based on the runoff flow rates calculated for each
intensity, operating rates within a proposed CDS system are

2
determined. Performance efficiency curve determined from full Two different gradations of silica sand material (UF Sediment
scale laboratory tests on defined sediment PSDs is applied to & OK-110) were used in the CDS performance evaluation. The
calculate solids removal efficiency. The relative removal efficiency particle size distributions (PSDs) of the test materials were
at each operating rate is added to produce a net annual pollutant analyzed using standard method “Gradation ASTM D-422
removal efficiency estimate. “Standard Test Method for Particle-Size Analysis of Soils” by a
certified laboratory.
Probabilistic Rational Method
The Probabilistic Rational Method is a sizing program Contech UF Sediment is a mixture of three different products produced
developed to estimate a net annual sediment load reduction for by the U.S. Silica Company: “Sil-Co-Sil 106”, “#1 DRY” and
a particular CDS model based on site size, site runoff coefficient, “20/40 Oil Frac”. Particle size distribution analysis shows that
regional rainfall intensity distribution, and anticipated pollutant the UF Sediment has a very fine gradation (d50 = 20 to 30 μm)
characteristics. covering a wide size range (Coefficient of Uniformity, C averaged
at 10.6). In comparison with the hypothetical TSS gradation
The Probabilistic Method is an extension of the Rational Method specified in the NJDEP (New Jersey Department of Environmental
used to estimate peak discharge rates generated by storm events Protection) and NJCAT (New Jersey Corporation for Advanced
of varying statistical return frequencies (e.g. 2-year storm event). Technology) protocol for lab testing, the UF Sediment covers a
Under the Rational Method, an adjustment factor is used to similar range of particle size but with a finer d50 (d50 for NJDEP
adjust the runoff coefficient estimated for the 10-year event, is approximately 50 μm) (NJDEP, 2003).
correlating a known hydrologic parameter with the target storm
event. The rainfall intensities vary depending on the return The OK-110 silica sand is a commercial product of U.S. Silica
frequency of the storm event under consideration. In general, Sand. The particle size distribution analysis of this material, also
these two frequency dependent parameters (rainfall intensity included in Figure 1, shows that 99.9% of the OK-110 sand is
and runoff coefficient) increase as the return frequency increases finer than 250 microns, with a mean particle size (d50) of 106
while the drainage area remains constant. microns. The PSDs for the test material are shown in Figure 1.

These intensities, along with the total drainage area and runoff
coefficient for each specific site, are translated into flow rates
using the Rational Method. Since most sites are relatively small
and highly impervious, the Rational Method is appropriate. Based
on the runoff flow rates calculated for each intensity, operating
rates within a proposed CDS are determined. Performance
efficiency curve on defined sediment PSDs is applied to calculate
solids removal efficiency. The relative removal efficiency at each
operating rate is added to produce a net annual pollutant
removal efficiency estimate.

Treatment Flow Rate

The inlet throat area is sized to ensure that the WQQ passes
through the separation chamber at a water surface elevation
equal to the crest of the diversion weir. The diversion weir Figure 1. Particle size distributions
bypasses excessive flows around the separation chamber,
Tests were conducted to quantify the performance of a specific
thus preventing re-suspension or re-entrainment of previously
CDS unit (1.1 cfs (31.3-L/s) design capacity) at various flow rates,
captured particles.
ranging from 1% up to 125% of the treatment design capacity of
Hydraulic Capacity the unit, using the 2400 micron screen. All tests were conducted
The hydraulic capacity of a CDS system is determined by the with controlled influent concentrations of approximately 200
length and height of the diversion weir and by the maximum mg/L. Effluent samples were taken at equal time intervals
allowable head in the system. Typical configurations allow across the entire duration of each test run. These samples
hydraulic capacities of up to ten times the treatment flow rate. were then processed with a Dekaport Cone sample splitter to
The crest of the diversion weir may be lowered and the inlet obtain representative sub-samples for Suspended Sediment
throat may be widened to increase the capacity of the system Concentration (SSC) testing using ASTM D3977-97 “Standard
at a given water surface elevation. The unit is designed to meet Test Methods for Determining Sediment Concentration in Water
project specific hydraulic requirements. Samples”, and particle size distribution analysis.

Performance Results and Modeling

Based on the data from the University of Florida, a performance
Full-Scale Laboratory Test Results
model was developed for the CDS system. A regression analysis
A full-scale CDS system (Model CDS2020-5B) was tested at the
was used to develop a fitting curve representative of the
facility of University of Florida, Gainesville, FL. This CDS unit was
scattered data points at various design flow rates. This model,
evaluated under controlled laboratory conditions of influent flow
which demonstrated good agreement with the laboratory data,
rate and addition of sediment.
can then be used to predict CDS system performance with respect

3
to SSC removal for any particle size gradation, assuming the Maintenance
particles are inorganic sandy-silt. Figure 2 shows CDS predictive
The CDS system should be inspected at regular intervals and
performance for two typical particle size gradations (NJCAT
maintained when necessary to ensure optimum performance.
gradation and OK-110 sand) as a function of operating rate.
The rate at which the system collects pollutants will depend more
heavily on site activities than the size of the unit. For example,
unstable soils or heavy winter sanding will cause the grit chamber
to fill more quickly but regular sweeping of paved surfaces will
slow accumulation.

Inspection
Inspection is the key to effective maintenance and is easily
performed. Pollutant transport and deposition may vary from
year to year and regular inspections will help ensure that the
system is cleaned out at the appropriate time. At a minimum,
inspections should be performed twice per year (e.g. spring
and fall) however more frequent inspections may be necessary
Figure 2. CDS stormwater treatment predictive performance for in climates where winter sanding operations may lead to rapid
various particle gradations as a function of operating rate. accumulations, or in equipment washdown areas. Installations
should also be inspected more frequently where excessive
Many regulatory jurisdictions set a performance standard for
amounts of trash are expected.
hydrodynamic devices by stating that the devices shall be capable
of achieving an 80% removal efficiency for particles having a The visual inspection should ascertain that the system
mean particle size (d50) of 125 microns (e.g. Washington State components are in working order and that there are no
Department of Ecology — WASDOE - 2008). The model can blockages or obstructions in the inlet and separation screen.
be used to calculate the expected performance of such a PSD The inspection should also quantify the accumulation of
(shown in Figure 3). The model indicates (Figure 4) that the CDS hydrocarbons, trash, and sediment in the system. Measuring
system with 2400 micron screen achieves approximately 80% pollutant accumulation can be done with a calibrated dipstick,
removal at the design (100%) flow rate, for this particle size tape measure or other measuring instrument. If absorbent
distribution (d50 = 125 μm). material is used for enhanced removal of hydrocarbons, the level
of discoloration of the sorbent material should also be identified

Figure 3. WASDOE PSD

Figure 4. Modeled performance for WASDOE PSD.

4
during inspection. It is useful and often required as part of an Cleaning
operating permit to keep a record of each inspection. A simple
Cleaning of a CDS systems should be done during dry weather
form for doing so is provided.
conditions when no flow is entering the system. The use of a
Access to the CDS unit is typically achieved through two manhole vacuum truck is generally the most effective and convenient
access covers. One opening allows for inspection and cleanout method of removing pollutants from the system. Simply remove
of the separation chamber (cylinder and screen) and isolated the manhole covers and insert the vacuum hose into the sump.
sump. The other allows for inspection and cleanout of sediment The system should be completely drained down and the sump
captured and retained outside the screen. For deep units, a fully evacuated of sediment. The area outside the screen should
single manhole access point would allows both sump cleanout also be cleaned out if pollutant build-up exists in this area.
and access outside the screen.
In installations where the risk of petroleum spills is small, liquid
The CDS system should be cleaned when the level of sediment contaminants may not accumulate as quickly as sediment.
has reached 75% of capacity in the isolated sump or when an However, the system should be cleaned out immediately in the
appreciable level of hydrocarbons and trash has accumulated. event of an oil or gasoline spill. Motor oil and other hydrocarbons
If absorbent material is used, it should be replaced when that accumulate on a more routine basis should be removed
significant discoloration has occurred. Performance will not be when an appreciable layer has been captured. To remove these
impacted until 100% of the sump capacity is exceeded however pollutants, it may be preferable to use absorbent pads since they
it is recommended that the system be cleaned prior to that are usually less expensive to dispose than the oil/water emulsion
for easier removal of sediment. The level of sediment is easily that may be created by vacuuming the oily layer. Trash and debris
determined by measuring from finished grade down to the can be netted out to separate it from the other pollutants. The
top of the sediment pile. To avoid underestimating the level of screen should be cleaned to ensure it is free of trash and debris.
sediment in the chamber, the measuring device must be lowered
Manhole covers should be securely seated following cleaning
to the top of the sediment pile carefully. Particles at the top of
activities to prevent leakage of runoff into the system from above
the pile typically offer less resistance to the end of the rod than
and also to ensure that proper safety precautions have been
consolidated particles toward the bottom of the pile. Once this
followed. Confined space entry procedures need to be followed
measurement is recorded, it should be compared to the as-built
if physical access is required. Disposal of all material removed
drawing for the unit to determine weather the height of the
from the CDS system should be done in accordance with local
sediment pile off the bottom of the sump floor exceeds 75% of
regulations. In many jurisdictions, disposal of the sediments may
the total height of isolated sump.
be handled in the same manner as the disposal of sediments
removed from catch basins or deep sump manholes. Check your
local regulations for specific requirements on disposal.

5
 Distance from Water Surface
Diameter Sediment Storage Capacity
to Top of Sediment Pile
CDS Model

ft m ft m y3 m3

CDS1515 3 0.9 3.0 0.9 0.5 0.4

CDS2015 4 1.2 3.0 0.9 0.9 0.7
CDS2015 5 1.5 3.0 0.9 1.3 1.0
CDS2020 5 1.5 3.5 1.1 1.3 1.0
CDS2025 5 1.5 4.0 1.2 1.3 1.0
CDS3020 6 1.8 4.0 1.2 2.1 1.6
CDS3025 6 1.8 4.0 1.2 2.1 1.6
CDS3030 6 1.8 4.6 1.4 2.1 1.6
CDS3035 6 1.8 5.0 1.5 2.1 1.6
CDS4030 8 2.4 4.6 1.4 5.6 4.3
CDS4040 8 2.4 5.7 1.7 5.6 4.3
CDS4045 8 2.4 6.2 1.9 5.6 4.3
CDS5640 10 3.0 6.3 1.9 8.7 6.7
CDS5653 10 3.0 7.7 2.3 8.7 6.7
CDS5668 10 3.0 9.3 2.8 8.7 6.7
CDS5678 10 3.0 10.3 3.1 8.7 6.7

Table 1: CDS Maintenance Indicators and Sediment Storage Capacities

Note: To avoid underestimating the volume of sediment in the chamber, carefully lower the measuring device to the top of the
sediment pile. Finer silty particles at the top of the pile may be more difficult to feel with a measuring stick. These finer particles
typically offer less resistance to the end of the rod than larger particles toward the bottom of the pile.

6
 CDS Inspection & Maintenance Log

CDS Model: Location:

Water Floatable Describe

Maintenance
Date depth to Layer Maintenance Comments
Personnel
sediment 1
Thickness 2
Performed

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

1. The water depth to sediment is determined by taking two measurements with a stadia rod: one measurement from the manhole opening to the
top of the sediment pile and the other from the manhole opening to the water surface. If the difference between these measurements is less
than the values listed in table 1 the system should be cleaned out. Note: to avoid underestimating the volume of sediment in the chamber,
the measuring device must be carefully lowered to the top of the sediment pile.

2. For optimum performance, the system should be cleaned out when the floating hydrocarbon layer accumulates to an appreciable thickness. In
the event of an oil spill, the system should be cleaned immediately.
7
SUPPORT
• Drawings and specifications are available at www.ContechES.com.
ENGINEERED SOLUTIONS
• Site-specific design support is available from our engineers.
800-338-1122
www.ContechES.com

©2017 Contech Engineered Solutions LLC, a QUIKRETE Company

Contech Engineered Solutions provides site solutions for the civil engineering industry. Contech’s portfolio includes bridges, drainage, sanitary
sewer, earth stabilization and stormwater treatment products. For information on other Contech division offerings, visit www.ContechES.com or
call 800.338.1122
NOTHING IN THIS CATALOG SHOULD BE CONSTRUED AS A WARRANTY. APPLICATIONS SUGGESTED HEREIN ARE DESCRIBED ONLY TO HELP READERS MAKE THEIR OWN EVALUATIONS AND
DECISIONS, AND ARE NEITHER GUARANTEES NOR WARRANTIES OF SUITABILITY FOR ANY APPLICATION. CONTECH MAKES NO WARRANTY WHATSOEVER, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, RELATED TO THE
APPLICATIONS, MATERIALS, COATINGS, OR PRODUCTS DISCUSSED HEREIN. ALL IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND ALL IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR
PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED BY CONTECH. SEE CONTECH’S CONDITIONS OF SALE (AVAILABLE AT WWW.CONTECHES.COM/COS) FOR MORE INFORMATION.

The product(s) described may be protected by one or more of the following US patents: 5,322,629; 5,624,576; 5,707,527; 5,759,415; 5,788,848; 5,985,157; 6,027,639; 6,350,374; 6,406,218;
6,641,720; 6,511,595; 6,649,048; 6,991,114; 6,998,038; 7,186,058; 7,296,692; 7,297,266; related foreign patents or other patents pending.

cds_manual 3/17 PDF

United States
Department of
A product of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey,
Custom Soil Resource
Agriculture a joint effort of the United Report for
States Department of
Agriculture and other
Federal agencies, State
Plymouth County,
Massachusetts
Natural agencies including the
Resources Agricultural Experiment
Conservation Stations, and local
Service participants

January 24, 2019

Preface
Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas.
They highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information
about the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for
many different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban
planners, community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers.
Also, conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste
disposal, and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand,
protect, or enhance the environment.
Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose
special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil
properties that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions.
The information is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of
soil limitations on various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for
identifying and complying with existing laws and regulations.
Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area
planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some
cases. Examples include soil quality assessments (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/
portal/nrcs/main/soils/health/) and certain conservation and engineering
applications. For more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center
(https://offices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?agency=nrcs) or your NRCS State Soil
Scientist (http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/contactus/?
cid=nrcs142p2_053951).
Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are
seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a
foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as
septic tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to
basements or underground installations.
The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States
Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey.
Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available
through the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the site for official soil survey information.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its
programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability,
and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion,
sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a
part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not
all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require

2
alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print,
audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice
and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of
Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or
call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity
provider and employer.

3
Contents
Preface.................................................................................................................... 2
How Soil Surveys Are Made..................................................................................5
Soil Map.................................................................................................................. 8
Soil Map................................................................................................................9
Legend................................................................................................................10
Map Unit Legend................................................................................................ 11
Map Unit Descriptions.........................................................................................11
Plymouth County, Massachusetts...................................................................13
636B—Montauk-Urban land complex, 0 to 8 percent slopes...................... 13
References............................................................................................................15

4
How Soil Surveys Are Made
Soil surveys are made to provide information about the soils and miscellaneous
areas in a specific area. They include a description of the soils and miscellaneous
areas and their location on the landscape and tables that show soil properties and
limitations affecting various uses. Soil scientists observed the steepness, length,
and shape of the slopes; the general pattern of drainage; the kinds of crops and
native plants; and the kinds of bedrock. They observed and described many soil
profiles. A soil profile is the sequence of natural layers, or horizons, in a soil. The
profile extends from the surface down into the unconsolidated material in which the
soil formed or from the surface down to bedrock. The unconsolidated material is
devoid of roots and other living organisms and has not been changed by other
biological activity.
Currently, soils are mapped according to the boundaries of major land resource
areas (MLRAs). MLRAs are geographically associated land resource units that
share common characteristics related to physiography, geology, climate, water
resources, soils, biological resources, and land uses (USDA, 2006). Soil survey
areas typically consist of parts of one or more MLRA.
The soils and miscellaneous areas in a survey area occur in an orderly pattern that
is related to the geology, landforms, relief, climate, and natural vegetation of the
area. Each kind of soil and miscellaneous area is associated with a particular kind
of landform or with a segment of the landform. By observing the soils and
miscellaneous areas in the survey area and relating their position to specific
segments of the landform, a soil scientist develops a concept, or model, of how they
were formed. Thus, during mapping, this model enables the soil scientist to predict
with a considerable degree of accuracy the kind of soil or miscellaneous area at a
specific location on the landscape.
Commonly, individual soils on the landscape merge into one another as their
characteristics gradually change. To construct an accurate soil map, however, soil
scientists must determine the boundaries between the soils. They can observe only
a limited number of soil profiles. Nevertheless, these observations, supplemented
by an understanding of the soil-vegetation-landscape relationship, are sufficient to
verify predictions of the kinds of soil in an area and to determine the boundaries.
Soil scientists recorded the characteristics of the soil profiles that they studied. They
noted soil color, texture, size and shape of soil aggregates, kind and amount of rock
fragments, distribution of plant roots, reaction, and other features that enable them
to identify soils. After describing the soils in the survey area and determining their
properties, the soil scientists assigned the soils to taxonomic classes (units).
Taxonomic classes are concepts. Each taxonomic class has a set of soil
characteristics with precisely defined limits. The classes are used as a basis for
comparison to classify soils systematically. Soil taxonomy, the system of taxonomic
classification used in the United States, is based mainly on the kind and character
of soil properties and the arrangement of horizons within the profile. After the soil

5
 Custom Soil Resource Report

scientists classified and named the soils in the survey area, they compared the
individual soils with similar soils in the same taxonomic class in other areas so that
they could confirm data and assemble additional data based on experience and
research.
The objective of soil mapping is not to delineate pure map unit components; the
objective is to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that
have similar use and management requirements. Each map unit is defined by a
unique combination of soil components and/or miscellaneous areas in predictable
proportions. Some components may be highly contrasting to the other components
of the map unit. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way
diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The delineation of such
landforms and landform segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, onsite
investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas.
Soil scientists make many field observations in the process of producing a soil map.
The frequency of observation is dependent upon several factors, including scale of
mapping, intensity of mapping, design of map units, complexity of the landscape,
and experience of the soil scientist. Observations are made to test and refine the
soil-landscape model and predictions and to verify the classification of the soils at
specific locations. Once the soil-landscape model is refined, a significantly smaller
number of measurements of individual soil properties are made and recorded.
These measurements may include field measurements, such as those for color,
depth to bedrock, and texture, and laboratory measurements, such as those for
content of sand, silt, clay, salt, and other components. Properties of each soil
typically vary from one point to another across the landscape.
Observations for map unit components are aggregated to develop ranges of
characteristics for the components. The aggregated values are presented. Direct
measurements do not exist for every property presented for every map unit
component. Values for some properties are estimated from combinations of other
properties.
While a soil survey is in progress, samples of some of the soils in the area generally
are collected for laboratory analyses and for engineering tests. Soil scientists
interpret the data from these analyses and tests as well as the field-observed
characteristics and the soil properties to determine the expected behavior of the
soils under different uses. Interpretations for all of the soils are field tested through
observation of the soils in different uses and under different levels of management.
Some interpretations are modified to fit local conditions, and some new
interpretations are developed to meet local needs. Data are assembled from other
sources, such as research information, production records, and field experience of
specialists. For example, data on crop yields under defined levels of management
are assembled from farm records and from field or plot experiments on the same
kinds of soil.
Predictions about soil behavior are based not only on soil properties but also on
such variables as climate and biological activity. Soil conditions are predictable over
long periods of time, but they are not predictable from year to year. For example,
soil scientists can predict with a fairly high degree of accuracy that a given soil will
have a high water table within certain depths in most years, but they cannot predict
that a high water table will always be at a specific level in the soil on a specific date.
After soil scientists located and identified the significant natural bodies of soil in the
survey area, they drew the boundaries of these bodies on aerial photographs and

6
 Custom Soil Resource Report

identified each as a specific map unit. Aerial photographs show trees, buildings,
fields, roads, and rivers, all of which help in locating boundaries accurately.

7
Soil Map
The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of
soil map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols
displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to
produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit.

8
 Custom Soil Resource Report
70° 46' 12'' W

Soil Map

70° 46' 3'' W

353660 353680 353700 353720 353740 353760 353780 353800 353820 353840

4663210
42° 6' 26'' N 42° 6' 26'' N
4663210

4663190
4663190

4663170
4663170

4663150
4663150

4663130
4663130

4663110
4663110

4663090
Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
4663090

42° 6' 22'' N 42° 6' 22'' N

353660 353680 353700 353720 353740 353760 353780 353800 353820 353840
70° 46' 12'' W

70° 46' 3'' W

Map Scale: 1:917 if printed on A landscape (11" x 8.5") sheet.
Meters
N 0 10 20 40 60
Feet
0 40 80 160 240
Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 19N WGS84
9
 Custom Soil Resource Report

MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION

Area of Interest (AOI) Spoil Area The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
Area of Interest (AOI) 1:12,000.
Stony Spot
Soils
Very Stony Spot
Soil Map Unit Polygons Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Wet Spot
Soil Map Unit Lines Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
Other
Soil Map Unit Points misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil
Special Line Features line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of
Special Point Features contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed
Blowout Water Features scale.
Streams and Canals
Borrow Pit
Transportation Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
Clay Spot
Rails measurements.
Closed Depression
Interstate Highways
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Gravel Pit
US Routes Web Soil Survey URL:
Gravelly Spot Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Major Roads
Landfill
Local Roads Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
Lava Flow projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
Background
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Marsh or swamp Aerial Photography Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more
Mine or Quarry accurate calculations of distance or area are required.

Miscellaneous Water This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as
Perennial Water of the version date(s) listed below.

Rock Outcrop
Soil Survey Area: Plymouth County, Massachusetts
Saline Spot Survey Area Data: Version 11, Sep 7, 2018

Sandy Spot
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales
Severely Eroded Spot 1:50,000 or larger.

Sinkhole
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Aug 26, 2014—Sep
Slide or Slip 4, 2014

Sodic Spot
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor
shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.

10
 Custom Soil Resource Report

Map Unit Legend

Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI

636B Montauk-Urban land complex, 0 1.6 100.0%

to 8 percent slopes
Totals for Area of Interest 1.6 100.0%

Map Unit Descriptions

The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the
soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along
with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit.
A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more
major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named
according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic
class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the
landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the
characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some
observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class.
Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without
including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made
up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor
components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils.
Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the
map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called
noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a
particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties
and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different
management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They
generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the
scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas
are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a
given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit
descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor
components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not
mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it
was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and
miscellaneous areas on the landscape.
The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the
usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate
pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or
landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The
delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however,
onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous
areas.

11
 Custom Soil Resource Report

An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions.
Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil
properties and qualities.
Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for
differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major
horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement.
Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness,
salinity, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the
basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas
shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase
commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha
silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series.
Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas.
These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups.
A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate
pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps.
The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar
in all areas. Alpha-Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example.
An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or
miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present
or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered
practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The
pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat
similar. Alpha-Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas
that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar
interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion
of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can
be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made
up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil
material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example.

12
 Custom Soil Resource Report

Plymouth County, Massachusetts

636B—Montauk-Urban land complex, 0 to 8 percent slopes

Map Unit Setting

National map unit symbol: 2w7zx
Elevation: 0 to 230 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 36 to 71 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 39 to 55 degrees F
Frost-free period: 145 to 240 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland

Map Unit Composition

Montauk and similar soils: 50 percent
Urban land: 40 percent
Minor components: 10 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.

Description of Montauk
Setting
Landform: Hills, ground moraines, recessionial moraines, drumlins
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope, shoulder, summit
Landform position (three-dimensional): Side slope, crest
Down-slope shape: Linear, convex
Across-slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Coarse-loamy over sandy lodgment till derived from gneiss,
granite, and/or schist
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 4 inches: fine sandy loam
Bw1 - 4 to 26 inches: fine sandy loam
Bw2 - 26 to 34 inches: sandy loam
2Cd - 34 to 72 inches: gravelly loamy sand
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 8 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: 20 to 39 inches to densic material
Natural drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: Medium
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Very low to moderately
high (0.00 to 1.42 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 18 to 37 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Salinity, maximum in profile: Nonsaline (0.0 to 1.9 mmhos/cm)
Available water storage in profile: Low (about 5.2 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2e
Hydrologic Soil Group: C
Hydric soil rating: No

13
 Custom Soil Resource Report

Description of Urban Land

Typical profile
M - 0 to 10 inches: cemented material
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 8 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: 0 inches to manufactured layer
Runoff class: Very high
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Very low (0.00 to 0.00
in/hr)
Available water storage in profile: Very low (about 0.0 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 8
Hydrologic Soil Group: D
Hydric soil rating: Unranked

Minor Components
Scituate
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Landform: Drumlins, hills, ground moraines
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, footslope, backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Crest, side slope
Down-slope shape: Linear, convex
Across-slope shape: Convex
Hydric soil rating: No
Udorthents, loamy
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread
Down-slope shape: Linear
Across-slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: No

14
References
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO).
2004. Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling
and testing. 24th edition.
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of
soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00.
Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of
wetlands and deep-water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service FWS/OBS-79/31.
Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States.
Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States.
Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric
soils in the United States.
National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries.
Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/
nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_054262
Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for
making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http://
www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_053577
Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to soil taxonomy. 11th edition. U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http://
www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/?cid=nrcs142p2_053580
Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and
Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands
Section.
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of
Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical
Report Y-87-1.
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National forestry manual. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/
home/?cid=nrcs142p2_053374
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National range and pasture handbook. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/
detail/national/landuse/rangepasture/?cid=stelprdb1043084

15
 Custom Soil Resource Report

United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.

National soil survey handbook, title 430-VI. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/
nrcs/detail/soils/scientists/?cid=nrcs142p2_054242
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States,
the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook
296. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/soils/?
cid=nrcs142p2_053624
United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Land
capability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 210. http://
www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcs142p2_052290.pdf

16
 TECHNICAL NOTE
Pipe Flotation
TN 5.05
March 2016

Introduction
The light weight of high density polyethylene (HDPE) and polypropylene (PP) pipe make it desirable because of the
ease of handling and installation but this same benefit also makes these thermoplastic pipes prone to flotation. All pipe
products, such as concrete and corrugated metal, are prone to flotation under the right circumstances. In fact, all pipe
materials and other buried structures are subject to flotation. When the uplift on the pipe or structure exceeds the
downward force of the weight and load it carries, the pipe (or structure) will rise or heave. Where flotation is a
possibility, proper installation and/or anchoring of the pipe is critical. This document provides an analysis on minimum
cover heights required to prevent pipe flotation for thermoplastic pipe sizes 12”-60”. Buoyant force due to flowable fill is
also discussed.

Hydrostatic Uplift Due to a High Water Table

Buoyancy becomes an issue in buried pipe when the groundwater encroaches into the pipe zone. For projects where a
high groundwater table or water surrounding the pipe is expected, precautions should be taken to prevent the floatation
of thermoplastic pipe. The vertical hydrostatic uplift force, due to the water table, must be balanced by the soil
overburden and the weight of the pipe in order to prevent flotation of the pipe. The vertical hydrostatic uplift force, U,
can be calculated from Equation 1 below:
 2
U  D w (1)
4

where U = lb/linear ft of pipe

D = O.D. of the pipe in question, ft.
w = unit weight of water = 62.4 lb/ft3

Soil loads experienced by a pipe at varying water table depths (Wsoil) can be calculated from Equation 2. Figure 1
illustrates each of the three cases seen in field installations where buoyancy becomes a concern, and also clarifies all
of the parameters contained within Equation 2.

Wsoil = dryHdryD + (sat- w)(Hsub+ 0.1073D)D (2)

where Wsoil = weight of soil overburden, lb/linear ft of pipe

dry = dry unit weight of the soil, lb/ft3
Hdry = depth of dry soil, ft.
Hsub = depth of submerged soil over top of pipe, ft.
sat = saturated unit weight of the soil, lb/ft3
sat - w = submerged unit weight of the soil, lb/ft3

4640 TRUEMAN BLVD. HILLIARD, OH 43026 (800) 821-6710 www.ads-pipe.com 1

ATN505 © ADS 2016
 Figure 1
Installation Conditions for Possible Flotation of Thermoplastic Pipe

(a) Water table at pipe crown (b) Water table exceeds (c) Water table is at
pipe crown elevation ground surface

The typical weights (Wpipe) and average outside diameters are shown in Table 1.

Table 1
Approximate Weights of ADS Thermoplastic Pipe
Nominal Dual Wall Pipe Triple Wall
Nominal OD
Diameter Weight Pipe Weight
in. (mm)
in. (mm) lb/ft (kg/m) lb/ft (kg/m)
4 (100) 4.6 (117) 0.44 (0.6) N/A
6 (150) 7.0 (178) 0.85 (1.3) N/A
8 (200) 9.5 (241) 1.5 (2.2) N/A
10 (250) 12 (305) 2.1 (3.1) N/A
12 (300) 14.5 (368) 3.2 (4.7) N/A
15 (375) 18 (457) 4.6 (6.8) N/A
18 (450) 22 (559) 6.4 (9.5) N/A
24 (600) 28 (711) 11.0 (16.4) N/A
30 (750) 36 (914) 15.4 (22.9) 20.7 (30.8)
36 (900) 42 (1067) 19.8 (29.4) 24.2 (36.0)
42 (1050) 48 (1219) 26.4 (39.3) 31.9 (47.5)
48 (1200) 54 (1372) 31.3 (46.6) 41.8 (62.3)
60 (1500) 67 (1702) 45.2 (67.3) 55.0 (81.9)
N/A indicates the pipe is not available in the respective diameter

2 4640 TRUEMAN BLVD. HILLIARD, OH 43026 (800) 821-6710 www.ads-pipe.com

ATN505 © ADS 2016
The minimum depth of cover (H) required to resist uplift can be calculated by equating the sum of the downward forces
to the sum of the upward or buoyant forces. While there are varying methods to account for soil load distribution on the
pipe, for conservative minimum cover requirements, the soil load is assumed to be the soil column directly above the
outside diameter of the pipe as illustrated in Figure 2(a). Therefore, minimum cover is calculated using Equations 3 and
4 below:

U O WSoil + WPipe (3)

where Wpipe = weight of the pipe, lb/linear ft of pipe

H = Hdry + Hsub (4)

Figure 2
Forces Affecting Flotation

(a) Soil Column Loading Conditions (b) Prism Loading Conditions

Table 2
Minimum Recommended Cover to Prevent Flotation of ADS Thermoplastic Pipe
Nominal Minimum Calculation Notes:
Diameter Cover 1. The pipe is assumed to be empty. This not only simplifies the
in. (mm) in. (mm) calculations but creates a condition that would encourage
flotation. Unless the system is constructed to be watertight,
4 (100) 3 (77) this condition would not likely be found in an actual
6 (150) 4 (102) installation.
8 (200) 5 (127) 2. The outside diameter of the corrugated pipe was used to
10 (250) 7 (178) determine soil and water displacement.
12 (300) 9 (228) 3. Saturated soil density used was 130 pcf which is typical for
many saturated soil mixtures. Soils of greater densities will
15 (375) 11 (280) reduce the chance of flotation.
18 (450) 13 (330) 4. The water table was assumed to be at the ground surface, as
24 (600) 17 (432) illustrated in Figure 1(c), simulating a fully saturated soil. This
30 (750) 22 (559) assumption creates a “worst case” condition to yield more
36 (900) 25 (635) conservative results.
5. The soil load prism shown in Figure 2(a) was used to
42 (1050) 29 (737)
determine soil weight.
48 (1200) 33 (838) 6. For structural purposes, a minimum cover of 12” (0.3m) shall
60 (1500) 40 (1016) apply for 4”-48” (100-1200mm) pipe, and 24” (0.6m) for 60”
(1500mm) pipe.

4640 TRUEMAN BLVD. HILLIARD, OH 43026 (800) 821-6710 www.ads-pipe.com 3

ATN505 © ADS 2016
Example 1: Calculate the minimum depth of cover required to prevent 48” N-12 HDPE from floating when the water
table is at the top of grade. The dry and saturated unit weights of the soil are 110 lb/ft3 and 130 lb/ft3, respectively.

Solution: U O WSoil + WPipe

Wpipe = 32.0 lb/ft (from Table 1)


U 4.52 62.4  992.4 lb/ft
4

The water table is at top of grade, so Figure 1(c) applies. Since Hdry=0, the first term in
Equation 2 is eliminated:

Therefore, Wsoil = (130 -62.4)[Hsub + (0.1073)(4.5)](4.5) + 32 = 304.2 Hsub + 146.9 + 32

Equation 3 then yields: 992.4 = 304.2 Hsub + 178.9

 Hsub = 2.67’ = 32.1” (use 33”)

Finally, calculate minimum cover from Equation 4: H = Hsub = 33”

The above calculations are conservative. The angle of internal friction of the soil, , and the coefficient of lateral earth
stress, Ko, are not accounted for in the above equations. These parameters are best left to the geotechnical engineer.
If these parameters are added to the above calculations, the depth of cover required would be reduced.

Anchoring Systems
In many instances pipe flotation may simply be addressed with adequate cover. In those situations where adequate
cover cannot be achieved, there are a number of acceptable alternate methods for restraining the pipe. Several
examples are shown in Figure 3.

Due to the variations in in-situ soil densities, water table heights, and the restraining force of the anchors, the Engineer
should evaluate the project-specific conditions to determine the required anchor type and spacing to prevent flotation.
The maximum spacing between anchor supports should not exceed 10 feet. In this manner, pipe is supported at each
joint and at the midpoint of each length of pipe to ensure adequate stabilization.

Figure 3
Pipe Stabilizing Alternatives

PRECAST CONCRETE COMMERCIALLY

GEOTEXTILE AVAILABLE SCREW
WRAP SWAMP WEIGHT
ANCHOR ASSEMBLY

BEDDING BEDDING BEDDING

(a) Geotextile wrap (b) Concrete collar (c) Screw anchor

4 4640 TRUEMAN BLVD. HILLIARD, OH 43026 (800) 821-6710 www.ads-pipe.com

ATN505 © ADS 2016
Uplift Due to Flowable Fill Backfill
Flowable fill, also known as controlled low strength material (CLSM), controlled density fill (CDF), and slurry fill, is
utilized as an alternate to compacted granular fill. Flowable fill typically consists of Portland Cement, sand, water, and
fly ash. Uplift due to CLSM backfill can be calculated from Equation 5.

A 
disp FF
U  (5)
144

Where, Adisp = Area of pipe displaced by flowable fill, in2

FF = Unit weight of flowable fill, lb/ft3
U = Uplift due to flowable fill backfill, lb/ft

Due to the vast differences in the unit weights between water and flowable fill, uplift caused by flowable fill can be
greater than two times that of hydrostatic uplift. When backfilling with flowable fill, the pipe will float in the absence of
soil overburden, since the weight of the pipe will not offset the vertical uplift. Precautions must be taken to ensure the
pipe remains on its intended alignment and grade. This is commonly done by anchoring the pipe in place or placing
the flowable fill in incremental lifts. Refer to Technical Note 5.02: Flowable Fill Backfill for Thermoplastic Pipe for
common anchoring methods and additional technical information related to placing flowable fill as backfill.

4640 TRUEMAN BLVD. HILLIARD, OH 43026 (800) 821-6710 www.ads-pipe.com 5

ATN505 © ADS 2016