Assignment Cover Sheet

Qualification Module Number and Title

HND in Computing and Software Engineering CSE5013/ Service Orineted Programming
Student Name & No. Assessor
<to be filled by the student>
Hand out date Submission Date

Assessment type Duration/Length of Weighting of Assessment

Reports 6000 Words Assessment Type 100%
4 weeks

Learner declaration

I certify that the work submitted for this assignment is my own and research sources are fully
acknowledged.

Marks Awarded
First assessor

IV marks

Agreed grade

Signature of the assessor Date

1
 FEEDBACK FORM
INTERNATIONAL COLLEGE OF BUSINESS & TECHNOLOGY
Module: Service Oriented Computing
Student:
Assessor :
Assignment:

2
 Strong features of your work:

Areas for improvement:

Marks Awarded:

Learning outcomes covered

 Understand Service oriented architecture and patterns.

 Design service application solution by applying SO concepts
 Develop service oriented application
 Critically evaluate the suitable delivery environment and deploy service application.

3
Scenario and the Task

Black Lotus (BL) is a company who is a well reputed flower supplier in Sri Lanka. Currently BL
supply to both local and international market. BL has company own flower selling outlets and
also has number of linked sellers who buy and resell BL flowers. Currently all the
communication happens via phone calls and BL flower outlets keeps manual entry of all the
transactions. BL main office keep Excel sheet to keep track of orders and flower stocks.

Current communication process and record keeping method has led to many problems in BL
such as order misplacement, double reserving, delays in suppling etc. Company management has
decided to implement sales and stock management system to overcome these issues and improve
the service and profits.
Application should implement following functions
 Manage category
 Manage flower data and stock
 Mange orders
 Check stock availability using flower name or codes
 View flower names and codes
Also third party vendors should able to check stock availability, and also can place orders. Some
of the third party vendors prefer to integrate these features to their own systems (need to focus on
this point when developing the application).
 Need develop a third party client application to demonstrate how third party vendor
communicate with BL.

Based on the above mention requirement you need to develop a SOC-based solution. Need to
implement needed requirements as services and also need to build client applications and
consume via API.
Tasks

1. Create a presentation explaining how Monolithic architecture and Service-oriented

architecture model can be used for this case study. Compare and contrast both

4
 architectures and justify the best architecture base on maintainability and scalability. (20
marks)
2. Design and develop a suitable application based on SOC. Need to implement the services
and also must create a client application to consume the services. Should be able to
demonstrate and provide all source codes with suitable design diagrams. Need to use
proper coding standards and must focus on the reusability and maintainability of the
application. (60 marks)
3. Properly test, the developed application should be able to demonstrate debugging process
and demonstrate testing results. (10 marks)
4. Explain deployment techniques that are suitable for the developed application (Server,
Docker, Kubernetes, etc..). (10 marks)
Submission Guidelines
 Submission format Report
 Paper Size: A4
 Words: 3000 words
 Printing Margins: LHS; RHS: 1 Inch
 Binding Margin: ½ Inch
 Header and Footer: 1 Inch
 Basic Font Size: 12
 Line Spacing: 1.5
 Font Style: Times New Roman
 Alignment Justified
 Referencing should be done strictly using Harvard system
Source code, database backup and installation packages should be submitted in a single zip
file.

Assessment Criteria
Task 1 contains 20 marks

Marks Marks obtained

Criteria by the student
Out of 20
for the answer

5
 provided
Excellent
Excellent level of understanding of development architectures,
critical comparison technically and also focusing other
14-20
environment factors, Higher level of depth and breadth of study
with extensive reading and integration of information from a
wide range of sources.
Good
Reasonable level of understanding of development architectures
12-14
and critical comparison technically, Good level of depth and
breadth of study,
Satisfactory
Reasonable level of understanding of development architectures 8-12
and comparison, satisfactory level of depth and breadth of study
Poor
Limited understanding of development architectures and poor
0-8
comparison. Limited reading, lack of depth and breadth of
study

Task 2 contains 60 marks

Marks Marks obtained

Criteria by the student
Out of 60 for the answer
provided
Excellent
Exceptional solution focus on reuse, maintainability, use of
proper architecture, error free and innovative features, 42-60
demonstration with proper planning, proper flow and good
presentation skills with clear explanations.
Good
Good solution complete application satisfying all user
36-42
requirements, Proper error handling, Proper demonstration
planed and well structured
Satisfactory
Basic application that can run without any build errors, fulfil
24-36
the basic requirements. Presentation and demonstration is
reasonable but flawed in structure or in some other way
Poor
Develop solution run with build errors, lack of error handling
0-24
and validation, the presentation and demonstration is
incoherent, incomplete or seriously weak in other ways
Task 3 contains 10 marks
Marks Marks obtained
Criteria by the student
Out of 10
for the answer

6
 provided
Excellent
Excellent justification for the selected test techniques. Proper
set of test cases to conduct a comprehensive test for the develop 7-10
solution with proper test data. Selection of appropriate test data.
Conduct test and critically analysis test results.
Good
Good justification for the selected test technique. Test cases to
6-7
cover testing of entire application with meaningful data.
Conduct test and a critically analysis test results.
Satisfactory
Reasonable justification of test techniques and test cases to test 4-6
the basic functionalities successfully. Analysis of test results.
Poor
Limited justification for test technique selection and incomplete
0-4
set of test cases, improper set of test data. Poor analysis of test
result.

Task 4 contains 10 marks

Marks Marks obtained
Criteria by the student
Out of 10 for the answer
provided
Excellent
Excellent justification for the selected deployment techniques,
7-10
by critically comparing with other available deployment
options. Excellent explanation on selected technique.
Good
Good justification for the selected deployment techniques, by
6-7
critically comparing with other available deployment options.
Proper explanation on selected technique.
Satisfactory
Reasonable justification for the selected deployment
4-6
techniques, by comparing with other available deployment
options. Satisfactory explanation on selected technique.
Poor
0-4
Limited justification, limited comparison with poor explanation
Total Marks Out of 100

7
8