HISTORY
HISTORY
MEANINGS OF HISTORY
○ how?
OUTLINE: ● the past can only be known indirectly except where one
actually witnesses a particular event
I. The Past & The Narrative ● but even the eyewitness account, or one’s memory is
II. History the Narrative
fallible
III. History the Discipline
IV. Historian’s competencies ● its impossible for a historian to cover all of the past
V. Historian’s attitudes
VI. Ethics History the Narrative
● Arthur Marwick: interpretations of (the past by) historians
The Past & The Narrative based on their critical study of the widest possible range of
relevant sources, every effort having been made to
challenge, & avoid the perpetuation of myth
Thinking Historically
1. chronological thinking: “the mental scaffolding for
organizing historical thought”
○ understanding the temporal structure of events
as they unfolded over time, actions and Historian’s Competencies
intentions of those who were there, temporal 1. source-based
connections between antecedents and their ○ find sources (mastery of sources)
consequence
○ necessary to analyze relationships between ○ select sources (determine relevance)
events and probe into causality ○ evaluate sources (weigh evidence, establish
credibility)
2. historical comprehension ○ consider contrary evidence
○ reading critically and imaginatively ○ apply the appropriate methodology (depending
○ understanding historical context so as to avoid on sources used)
“present-mindedness”
○ developing historical perspectives while
describing the past on its own terms, through the 2. interpretive
eyes and experiences of those who were there ○ see link between events and understand their
context
3. historical analysis and interpretation ○ build plausible, coherent argument using
○ engaging in dialogue with historians not only historical materials
about what happened but also why and how it ○ show importance of one’s work in light of other
happened, its effect on other events and people,
accounts
and how much importance it should be given
○ use perspectives, frameworks appropriately
2. intellectual level
○ understand that events dont happen in a
vacuum, that context is important
○ avoid anachronism when looking at the past
○ appreciate how things happen and change,
which human intentions count, & how results are
shaped by the means used to carry them out
○ enjoy reading, digging up evidence & making
discoveries
○ recognize the difference between evidence &
judgment
○ set apart what is important from what is not
○ grasp the complexity of historical causation,
human actions & events
○ avoid simplistic & judgmental assumptions
○ appreciate the often-tentative nature of
judgements about the past
○ affirm the importance of human agency & accept
that sometimes accidental force plays a role in
human affairs
Ethics
● be human, self aware and fair
● always acknowledge others’ ideas / works that you borrow
and the role of collaborators, inc. financial support
● be faithful to sources
○ dont add words to author’s statements or shorten
it, that would change the meaning
HISTORICAL METHOD
○ audio recordings
OUTLINE:
Primary Sources
I. History as Reconstruction ● testimony of an eyewitness
II. Historical Sources ● must have been produced by a contemporary of the event
III. Historical Criticism it narrates
● a document or physical object which was written or created
History as Reconstruction during the time under study
● the historian is many times removed from the events under
● these sources were present during an experience or time
investigation
period and offer an inside view of a particular event
● historians rely on surviving records
● “only a part of what was observed in the past was
● characterized by their content, regardless of whether they
remembered by those who observed it; only a part of what are available in original format, in microfilm/microfiche, in
was remembered was recorded; only a part of what was digital format, or in published format
recorded has survived; only a part of what has survived has ● 4 main categories of primary sources
come to the historian’s attention” ○ written sources
● “only a part of what is credible has been grasped, and only ○ images
a part of what has been grasped can be expounded or ○ artifacts
narrated by the historian ○ oral testimony
Internal Criticism
● the problem of credibility
● relevant particulars in the document - is it credible?
● verisimilar - as close as what really happened from a
critical examination of best available sources
● tests of credibility
○ identification of author
■ e.g. to determine his reliability; mental
processes; personal attitudes
○ determination of the approximate date
■ e.g. handwriting, signature, seal
○ ability to tell the truth
■ e.g. nearness to the event,
competence of witness, degree of
attention
○ willingness to tell the truth
■ e.g. to determine if the author
consciously or unconsciously tells
falsehoods
○ corroboration
Rivalry between Spain & Portugal ● James A. Richardson made his own Eng ver. of the
● This rivalry in the Iberian Peninsula was exacerbated by Ambrosian copy & it appeared in PH → the copy widely
trade as both were interested in exploring & developing circulated in the PH
trade.
● Both were located in ideal places to start exploring Africa Pigafetta’s Travelogue
○ Started thinking about trying to go around Africa ● contributed immensely to the enrichment of Philippine
& find a way to Spice Islands in Asia. historiography
● The competition between Spain & Portugal became heated ● His writing described the ff of the ppl they encountered in
enough that the 2 countries had to get the pope to divide Samar, Leyte & Cebu
up the New World into ○ physical appearance
○ parts that would be Spanish ○ social life
○ parts that would be Portuguese ○ religious beliefs
○ cultural practices
Ferdinand Magellan ● contains info about the economic activities of the local folks
● the Royal Crown of Spain supported the plan to go east by & goods they offered for trade
sailing westward → proposal was not supported by ● He got this info thru the help of Enrique de Malacca
Portugal (Magellan’s slave/interpreter)
● expedition suffered natural & man-made challenges ● gave an eyewitness account of the Battle of Mactan which
● 3/5 ships that left Spain reached the PH resulted to the death of Magellan & him getting wounded
● Magellan’s voyage was instrumental in introducing
Christianity in the PH but it also cost his life after the Analysis of the Important Historical Information
Spaniards lost in the Battle of Mactan. Introduction
● With only 2 ships, the survivors of Magellan were able to ● All info that can be gleaned from the account “First Voyage
reach the Spice Island Around the World” is written from the perspective of the
● September 7, 1522 → Juan Sebastian Elcano and 17 writer/author who is Italian
survivors arrived in Spain aboard the ship Victoria. ○ a view from the outsider
○ it should be understood in the context of the time
About the Book ● descriptions of our ancestors are explicitly described
Antonio Pigafetta’s Journal ○ the way they treat visitors
● He was one of the survivors who kept a journal ○ their homes
● became the main source about the 1st encounter of ○ their customs and traditions
Spaniards & Filipinos ○ Foods
● The original journal of Pigafetta did not survive in history ○ Others
● what was handed down are copies that never came out of ● one should be careful for some of these info are described
the press during his lifetime in a way that it needs to be analyzed using both
● 3 were in French & 2 are kept in the Bibliotheque Nationale perspectives → European and our own (i.e. words and
in Paris terminologies)
● The 3rd one was originally owned by the British Collector ● the “pantayong pananaw” is employed for the presentation
Sir Thomas Phillipp of the analysis
● Beinecke Rare Book bought the 3rd & now kept in the
Manuscript Library of Yale University in New Haven Important Personages Cited in the Document
Ferdinand Magellan
4th Copy of the Journal ● Portugese - Ferñao de Magalhaes
● was written in mixed Italian, Spanish & Venetian ● Captain
● could be found in Ambrosian Library in Milan ● General leader of the expedition
● 1800: Carlo Amoretti published an Italian version
● 1801: a French version came out in Paris Antonion Pigafetta
● 1819: Pinkerton → translated & publishes it to English ● Italian
● Official chronicler of the expedition
Christianization
● The documents narrated the conversion of early Filipinos
into Christianity
At present
● Textbook writers use his book as their source of historical
info every time they discuss the beginning of Christianity in
the PH
● Taken from Pigafetta’s book
○ accounts on the first mass in the P
○ the conversion of Rajah Humabon & his wife
○ the story of the image of Sto. Nino