STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND DESIGN

FOR CONSTRUCTION OF TEMPORARY BRIDGE

(CRANEWAY)

HUNAN ROAD AND BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION GROUP COMPANY LTD.

CAMALANIUGAN BRIDGE PROJECT

Mabanguc, Aparri and Catotoran Norte, Camalaniugan, Cagayan

APRIL 2021
 INDEX
CHAPTER 1 CONSTRUCTION INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................- 3 -
1.1 CONSTRUCTION BRIEFING..............................................................................................................- 3 -

2.2 CONSTRUCTION CONDITIONS...........................................................................................................- 3 -

2.2.1 TOPOGRAPHY AND GEOLOGICAL CONDITIONS....................................................................- 3 -
2.2.2 METEOROLOGICAL CONDITIION..........................................................................................- 4 -
2.2.3 HYDROLOGY CONDITION ......................................................................................................- 4 -
2.2.4 TRANSPORTATION CONDITON..............................................................................................- 5 -
CHAPTER VI DECK BRIDGE AND PLATFORM BOQ CALCULATION .................................................................- 5 -
3.1 MAIN DECK BRIDGE........................................................................................................................- 5 -
3.1.1 COMPUTATION SPECS ..........................................................................................................- 5 -
3.1.2 LOAD SYSTEM RATIO ..........................................................................................................- 6 -
3.1.3 LOAD COMBINATION ............................................................................................................- 7 -
3.1.4 ALL COMPONENTS CALCULATION RESULT..........................................................................- 7 -
3.2 APPROACH BRIDGE SHAPED STEEL DECKS CALCULATION..........................................................- 15 -
3.2.1 CALCULATION METHOD AND CONTENT..............................................................................- 15 -
3.2.1 ALL COMPONENTS CALCULATION RESULTS......................................................................- 16 -
3.3 STEEL PLATFORM CALCULATION..................................................................................................- 19 -
3.3.1 CALCULATION METHOD AND CONTENT..............................................................................- 19 -
3.3.2 LOAD COMBINATION ..........................................................................................................- 19 -
3.3.3 Load sub-factor ...................................................................................................................- 20 -
6.3.4 荷载组合 Load combination ...............................................................................................- 20 -
3.3.5 CALCULATION RESULT OF ALL COMPONENTS..................................................................- 20 -
3.4 CALCULATION OF LIFTING FRAME .........................................................................................- 25 -
3.4.1 CALCULATION METHOD AND CONTENT..............................................................................- 25 -
3.4.5 ALL COMPONENETS CALCULATION RESULT......................................................................- 26 -
3.5 STEEL TUBE CALCULATION..........................................................................................................- 28 -
3.5.1 EMBEDDED DEPTH CALCULATION OF STEEL TUBES........................................................- 28 -
3.5.2 DRVING DEPTH OF STEEL TUBES....................................................................................- 29 -
3.5.3 STEEL TUBE STRENGTH CALCULATION............................................................................- 29 -
3.5.4 STEEL TUBE STRESS INTERGRITY CALCULATION..........................................................- 29 -
 CHAPTER 1 CONSTRUCTION INTRODUCTION

1.1 CONSTRUCTION BRIEFING

The missing link between Manila North Road (jct.bangag-Paruddum section) and jct. Cagayan Valley
Road (Camalaniugan) in Cagayan Province, Philippines is located in Cagayan Province, Luzon,
Philippines, the project is located at north eastern tip of the island and it is about 9km away from the
estuary of the Pacific Ocean.
The Camalaniugan Bridge is the remarkable and benchmark project. The bridge is located in
Camalaniugan City, Cagayan Province across the Cagayan River. The starting pile number is
STA.697+273.0 (Cagayan The west bank of the river), the terminal pile number is STA.698+854.4 (the
east bank of the Cagayan River), with a total length of 1580m. The overall bridge layout is: (3×55m)×6
prestressed concrete box girder + (82.5m+157.5m+157.5+m82.5m) low tower concrete cable-stayed
bridge + 2×55m prestressed concrete box girder, The bridge deck width of the section is 14.02m, and the
bridge deck width of the other main bridge sections is 13.42m. The cross section is divided into: 0.2m
(guardrail) + 2.45m (pedestrian cable area) + 0.4m (anti-collision guardrail) + 7.32 m (travel lane) + 0.4m
(anti-collision guardrail) +2.45m (pedestrian cable area) +0.2m (guardrail); the approach bridge deck width
is 11.02m, and the cross section is divided into: 0.2m (guardrail) +1.25m (Pedestrian cable area) +0.4m
(anti-collision guardrail) +7.32m (carriageway) +0.4m (anti-collision guardrail) +1.25m (pedestrian cable
area) +0.2m (guardrail), the main bridge adopts tower beams In the consolidation system, the box girder
is a single-box single-chamber sloping box section, the piers are all solid vase piers, the foundations are
all bored pile foundations, and the abutments are gravity abutments.
In order to meet the structural requirements of foundation, abutment, piles, cabled tower, on-the-spot
casted beams above water in this bridge, Deck Bridge and steel platform will be installed on the south
span of main bridge to serve as transportation access for heavy equipment and operation above water.

2.2 CONSTRUCTION CONDITIONS

2.2.1 TOPOGRAPHY AND GEOLOGICAL CONDITIONS

The bridge is located in Catotoran Town, Camalaniugan City, Cagayan Province, Philippines. The
bridge crosses the waters of the Cagayan River. The bridge site is located in the Cagayan River Valley as
a whole. The overall river bed is relatively flat, and the river bed elevation is about -17~- 10m. The
geology of the bridge site is composed of impact terraces and impact fillers. Within 30m underground, it is
composed of fine sand, sometimes mixed with gravel and pebbles, and part of it is formed by in-situ
alteration of underlying materials and transported materials. The upper clastic rock is mainly thin to middle
gray siltstone and well-hardened mudstone. The lower clastic rock is mainly composed of well-hardened
brown-gray feldspar sandstone and a small amount of interlayer conglomerate.

-3-
 TOPOGRAPHY LAYERS
LAYER THINCKNESS
NAME SCOPE GEOLOGICAL TOP TO
TOP TO BOTTOM
CONDITION BOTTOM

The overburden layer is basically

silt or gravel sand, mixed with low
The thickness of the
plastic to high plasticity clay and silt
overburden in the
East and Gravel sand, silt and a small amount of clay sand at
bridge site area is
west sand, clay sand, 20-40m. The silt sand of the
relatively large,
CAMALANIUGAN banks of silt, cohesive uppermost layer of 1-2m is washed
generally above 33m,
BRIDGE Cagayan soil, sandstone to the bridge site, and there is
and the maximum
River. basically no Side friction resistance,
thickness revealed by
the underlying bedrock is strongly
exploration is 52.2m
weathered sandstone.
maximum,.

2.2.2 METEOROLOGICAL CONDITIION

CAMALANIUGAN BRIDGE METEOROLOGICAL CONDITIINS REVIEW

CLIMATE FEATURES

Monsoon subtropical rain forest climate zone

CLIMATE
Humid, hot and rainy, the year is divided into rainy season and dry season
FEATURE

ANNUAL AVERAGE
annual average temperature is about 27℃, high temperature and humidity
TEMPERATURE

The average annual precipitation is 2000～3000mm. The rainy season is

PRECIPITATION from February to July each year, and the dry season is from August to
January of the following year, with concentrated rainfall.
There are many typhoons from June to November every year, and the
WIND
maximum wind speed in the past 20 years can reach 120km/h.

2.2.3 HYDROLOGY CONDITION

The water resource within the project areas is abundant.Many rivers merge into the Cagayan River
by Camalaniugan Bridge, which flows from south to north through Cagayan Province and into the
Babayan Strait. The normal water level of the river section where the bridge site is located is generally
around +1.0m, and the flood level is around +3.0m after field survey and investigation. .

-4-
2.2.4 TRANSPORTATION CONDITON
The surrounding road network in this area is well-developed, and the temporary construction site
transportation is convenient and close to Manila North Road, and the road is wide. Manila North Road is
directly connected to the AH26 National Highway to the north and to the starting point of the project on the
south, but from the starting point of the project to the main bridge It is necessary to build a construction
access road, and the transportation of heavy equipment and materials is generally more convenient.

CHAPTER VI DECK BRIDGE AND PLATFORM BOQ CALCULATION

3.1 MAIN DECK BRIDGE

3.1.1 COMPUTATION SPECS

3.1.1.1 CALCULATION BASIS

1. "Code for Design of Steel Structures" (GB50017-2017)
2. "Code for Design of Highway Steel Structure Bridges" (JTG D64-2015)
3. "General Code for Design of Highway Bridges and Culverts" (JTG•D60-2004)
4. "Code for Design of Foundation and Foundation of Highway Bridges and Culverts" (JTJ0 D63-2007)
5. "Road and Bridge Construction Calculation Manual"
6. "Manual for Multi-purpose Use of Prefabricated Highway Steel Bridges"
7. "Steel Structure Design Manual"

3.1.1.2 BASIC SPECS

1.The density of reinforced concrete is 2.6t/m3, the density of steel is 7.85t/m3, the elastic modulus
of steel is E=2.1x105Mpa, and the Poisson’s ratio is 0.3.

2.shaped steel specs

DECK BRIDGE AND PLATFORM STEEL SPECS LIST
SHEAR
TENSILE DESIGN RESISTANCE
STEEL NO# APPLICABLE LOCATION
STRENGTH（Mpa） STRENGTH
（Mpa）
pipe pile I-beam, Channel
Q23 215 125
bar,, steel plate
Q345 310 180 belle beam
Q420 195 belle pin

3.1.1.3 CALCULATION METHOD AND CONTENT

This calculation model adopts MIADAS finite element program, and establishes a space model
according to the actual structure of the trestle for overall analysis and calculation. In order to ensure the
-5-
consistency between the model and the actual forces, the lateral distribution beams on the bridge deck
and the Bailey beams are connected by hinges, and the bottom of the steel pipe piles are consolidated.
Load Application:
When the vehicle is running, both vehicle load and pedestrian load act on the distributed beams on
the bridge deck; other structures of the trestle bridge are applied in the form of self-weight in the
calculation model;
Main calculation content: the overall strength and stiffness of the main structure of the trestle bridge

3.1.1.4 LOAD COMBINATION

Partial load value

① Self-weight of trestle bridge

The self-weight of the structure is considered in the calculation model according to 7.85t/m3

② Vehicle load
The passing vehicle loads considered for construction are: 10m³ concrete mixer truck with full load
(including concrete) 50T, 50T crawler crane, 280 type rotary drill (weight 85t), not passing at the same
time, considering the most unfavorable situation, so the calculated load is 85T According to the calculation
of rotary drilling, the load distribution is as follows: the crawler on the left is 170KN/m, and the crawler on
the right is 170KN/m.
The lateral distance between the wheels is 3.6m, and the track along the direction of the vehicle is
5m.
③ Crowd load
The bridge is 6m wide, and vehicle is planned to pass 5m in the middle and 1m wide pedestrian
passage on one side. The crowd load is 3.5KN/m2.
④ Water impact load
The calculated water level for construction is +3, the lower elevation of the bottom of the riverbed is -14.8,
the elevation of the trestle deck is +5.00, the maximum water depth is about 17.8m, the elevation of the
bottom of the steel trestle Bailey beam is +3.27, and the maximum height from the riverbed is 18.07m ,
The water level in twenty-five years is 0.27m from the bottom of Belle beam. Water impact force acting on
steel pipe piles during flood period (every 20 years):
Fw = KA (rv2/2g) (KN)
In the formula: r—the bulk density of water (KN/m3), r=10 (KN/m3)
v—there is no data of the once-in-20-year event, take the maximum flow rate in the 25-year event
(m/s), V=4.14 (m/s) in the flood evaluation data
A—Water blocking area (m2), steel pipe pile A1=17. 3x0.63=10.899m2
g—acceleration of gravity, g=10 (m/s2)
K-shape factor, circular structure, take K=0.8. Then: FW=77KN (steel pile).

3.1.2 LOAD SYSTEM RATIO

Live load sub-factor: 1.4
-6-
Constant load sub-factor: 1.2;

3.1.3 LOAD COMBINATION

According to 3.1.5 of "Code for Design of Steel Structures" (GB50017-2003).
Strength calculation: ①+②+③+④

Stiffness checking calculation: ①+②

That is, the strength load: P=1.2P1+1.4P2+1.4P3+1.4P4, the stiffness load: P=P1+P2
Choose three 12m spans for simulation calculation, and load them into the MIDAS model based on the
above load calculations, as follows.

3.1.4 ALL COMPONENTS CALCULATION RESULT

3.1.4.1 SUBSTRUCTURE
1、PIPE PILES

The maximum reaction force of the steel pipe pile is 768.6KN

-7-
The maximum stress of the steel pipe pile is 80.8Mpa＜[σ]=215Mpa, which meets the stress
requirements.
2. Depth of steel pipe pile into soil
According to geological survey data, the soil layers in the water are loose sand, dense sand, low-plastic
clay, sandy silt and sandstone (full weathering, strong weathering and moderate weathering) from top to
bottom. The specific mechanical parameters are averaged.
According to the data of the geological survey hole at the existing pier site and the physical parameters
given in the geological survey report, the penetration depth of the steel pipe pile is calculated after
calculation. The following calculation considers the erosion depth of 2m.

SOIL LAYER THICKNESS（m）

MIN IN
NO LOCATION THICK DENSE
CLAY SAND HARD SILT GRAVE SOIL
SAND SAND
DEPTH

17# PIER 2 3-11 11-22.5 23-40 41-50

SIDE
15 45 70 115 280
1 FRICTION
END
280 710 1340-2390 2200 3000
FRICTION
18# PIER 2 3-7.5 7.5-21 22-37.5 38-55
SIDE
24 45 70 135 280
2 FRICTION
END
600 1240 810-2440 2700 3000
FRICTION
19#PIER 3 4 5-18 18-27 27-75
SIDE
16 35 66 118 280
3 FRICTION
END
330 570 1240-2630 2700 3000
FRICTION

-8-
 20#PIER 2 2 5-15 16-33 34-75
SIDE
15 21 70 85 280
4 FRICTION
END
140 380 1050-2340 1560 3000
FRICTION
21#PIER 2 3-6 7-22.5 23-75
SIDE
10 50 100 280
5 FRICTION
END
1240 1300-2770 1240-2700 3000
FRICTION
The specific calculation is as follows:
[ρ]=1/k(U∑f1L1+AR)
Where
[ρ]--the allowable bearing capacity of the pile KN;
U-----The perimeter of the cross section of the pile body m;
fi----The pile body passes through the ultimate friction resistance Kpa between each layer and the pile
body, check " Bridge Preliminary Investigation Report";
Li----thickness of each soil layer m;
A-----supporting area of pile bottom m2;
R-----Pile tip ultimate grinding resistance Kpa;
K----Safety factor, 2 is used in this design.
The pile foundation adopts φ630mm steel pipe pile, the calculated wall thickness is δ=8mm, and the pile
is settled by vibratory hammering. The perimeter of the pile U=1.9782m, and the pile end area
A=0.0156m2.
The maximum force of a single steel pipe pile is 768.6KN.
①17# Pier location
Enter the dense sand layer 4.5m, and the depth of soil is 15.5m

[ρ]= 1 U 
2
 f i
Li  AR 
 1.9782  [15  2  (45  9)  (4.5 x70)  0.0156  2010
1

2
=772KN
The load Pmax is greater than that of the steel pipe pile and the load can reach requirement.
②18# Pier location
Drive 6.5m into the dense sand layer, 14m deep into the soil

[ρ]= 1 U 
2
 f i
Li  AR 

-9-
  1.9782  [24  2  (45  5.5)  (6.5 x70)  0.0156  1880
1

2
=773KN
The load Pmax is greater than that of the steel pipe pile and the load can reach requirement.
③19# Pier position
10m into the dense sand layer, 14m deep into the soil
[ρ]= 1 U 
2
 f i
Li  AR 
 1.9782  [16  3  (35  1)  (66 x10)  0.0156  2630
1

2
=775.4KN
The load Pmax is greater than that of the steel pipe pile. fulfil requirements.
④20# Pier location
10m into the dense sand layer, 14m deep into the soil

[ρ]= 1 U 
2
 f i
Li  AR 
 1.9782  [15  2  (21  2)  (10 x70)  0.0156  2010
1

2
=794KN
The load Pmax is greater than that of the steel pipe pile. fulfil requirements.
⑤21# Pier location
6m into the clay layer, 12m deep into the soil
[ρ]= 1 U 
2
 f i
Li  AR 
 1.9782  [10  2  (40  4)  (6 x100)  0.0156  2100
1

2
=803KN
The load Pmax is greater than that of the steel pipe pile. fulfil requirements.

3. Calculation of stability of steel pipe pile under compression

According to 8.2.1-1 of "Code for Design of Steel Structure GB-50017-2017", the stability of solid-web
axial compression members should be calculated according to the formula:

N
 f
A

- 10 -
The calculated length of the Ф630×8mm steel pipe pile is 17m, the cross-sectional area A=156.3cm², the
moment of inertia Ix=Iy=75612.4cm4; the radius of gyration ix=22.0cm. The steel pipe pile is fixed at one
end and hinged at the other end, with a length factor of μ=1.
Slenderness ratio
λ=μL/i-=77
Check Appendix G to get a stability coefficient of 0.597, take the maximum reaction force of the steel pipe
pile 768kN, and calculate the following results, which meet the requirements of the specification.
From the above calculation results, the maximum stress of the steel pipe pile is 82.3MPa<190MPa, and
the stability of the steel pipe pile meets the requirements.

4、桩顶横梁 PILE TOP CROSS BEAM

The max reaction force of pile top cross beam is 92.0Mpa＜[σ]=215Mpa, which meet the reaction
requirement.

The maximum deflection is 5.3mm<[f]=4500/400=11.25mm, which meets the deflection requirements

3.1.4.2 BELLE BEAM

1、PRESTRESS

- 11 -
 The maximum stress is 261Mpa<[σ]=310Mpa of the vertical rod at the top of the pile, which meets
the stress requirements

2、DEFORMATION

The maximum deflection is 12.9/mm＜[f]=12000/400=30mm, which meets the requirement of

deflection.
3、 TRUSS

- 12 -
The maximum stress is 95.8Mpa<[σ]=210Mpa at the top of the end pile, which meets the stress
requirements.

3.1.4.3 DISTRIBUTION BEAM

The maximum stress of the distribution beam is 55Mpa＜[σ]=215Mpa, which meets the stress
requirements.

The maximum deflection is 12.89-12.42=0.47mm<[f]=1350/400=3.325mm, which meets the deflection

requirements.

3.1.4.4 BRIDGE DECK

- 13 -
 The maximum stress of the transverse distribution beam is 46.2Mpa＜[σ]=215Mpa, which meets the
stress requirements.
3.1.5 Stability Analysis of Trestle Bridge under Current Impact
During the construction period, the most unfavorable hydrological condition is calculated based on
the flood once in 25 years. The maximum water depth during the flood period of the trestle bridge area is
about 3+14.8=17. 3m, and the maximum water depth of the constant water level is about
0.5+14.8=15.3m. The maximum height of the riverbed is 3.27+14.8=17.98m.
Water impact force acting on steel pipe piles during flood period (every 25 years):
Fw = KA (rv2/2g) (KN)
In the formula: r—the bulk density of water (KN/m3), r=10 (KN/m3)
v—Velocity in 25 years (m/s), take V=4.14 (m/s)
A—Water blocking area of steel pipe pile (m2), A=17.3×0.63=10.9m2
g—acceleration of gravity, g=10 (m/s2)
K-shape factor, circular structure, take K=0.8.
then:
Maximum water resistance of a single steel pipe pile: Fw=9.2×1.4=74.7KN
The self-weight of the upper structure of the one-span trestle bridge: Q=202KN, uniformly arranged
on the load-bearing beam, and the uniformly distributed load is 37.4KN/m.
The impact force of the water flow is evenly distributed at 2/3 of the length of the steel pipe pile
below the water surface, and the uniform load is 7.4KN/m.
When considering the stability of the trestle under the impact of water flow, the lower part of the steel
pipe pile is regarded as a hinged structure, and the upper part is connected by the lower beam and
scissors to form a portal frame structure to jointly resist the impact of water flow and take the impact of
water flow during the flood period. Calculation is shown in the graph below:

- 14 -
 The maximum stress of the steel pipe pile is 138Mpa＜[σ]=215Mpa. The trestle structure can meet
the needs of anti-collapse by its own weight under the impact of water flow during the flood period. In
addition, considering the auxiliary drilling platform to the trestle, the trestle structure is safe under the
impact of water flow in the flood period.

3.2 APPROACH BRIDGE SHAPED STEEL DECKS CALCULATION

3.2.1 CALCULATION METHOD AND CONTENT

This calculation model adopts MIADAS finite element program, and establishes a space model
according to the actual structure of the steel trestle for overall analysis and calculation. In order to ensure
the consistency between the model and the actual force, the horizontally distributed beams on the bridge
deck and the I-beam are connected by hinges, and the bottom of the steel pipe piles are reinforced as
well.
Load application:
When the vehicle is running, both vehicle load and pedestrian load act on the distributed beams on
the bridge deck; other structures of the trestle bridge are applied in the form of self-weight in the
calculation model;
The main calculation content: the overall strength and rigidity of the main structure of the trestle
bridge.
Three 6m spans are selected for simulation calculation, and the calculated load is the same as the
Bailey deck bridge. The specifics are as follows.

- 15 -
3.2.1 ALL COMPONENTS CALCULATION RESULTS

1、PIPES PILE

The maximum resistance of pipe piles is 692.1KN。

The maximum resistance of pipe pile is 140.3KN.

2、PIPE PILES DRIVING DEPTH IN SOIL
- 16 -
 According to the geological survey data, the soil layers at riverbed are clay, compact gravel sand,
mud and sandstone (heavy differentiation, moderate weathering) from top to bottom. The specific
mechanical parameters are averaged.
According to the data of the geological survey hole at the existing pier site and the physical
parameters given in the geological survey report, the depth of penetration of the steel pipe pile can be
obtained after calculation. The scouring depth of riverbed is not considered, and the specific calculation is
as follows:

Low Hard Hard sand

Thick Hard Gravel
Location plastic clay clay
gravel (Kpa)
clay (Kpa) (Kpa)

Soil layer
1m 2-9m 9-16.5m 16.5-22.5m 22.5-40.5
thickness

Side friction 16 40 75 90 131

End friction 530 330-1140 620-1400 1290-1720 2700

ththck 1L1+AR)
[ρ]=1/k(U∑f

Where [ρ]--the allowable bearing capacity of the pile KN;

U-----The perimeter of the cross section of the pile body m;
fi----The pile body passes through the ultimate friction resistance Kpa between each layer and the pile
body, check the "Preliminary Survey Report of Camalaniugan Bridge";
Li----thickness of each soil layer is meter;
A-----supporting area of pile bottom m2;
R-----Pile tip ultimate grinding resistance Kpa;
K----Safety factor, 2 is used in this design.
The pile foundation adopts φ630mm steel pipe pile, the calculated wall thickness is δ=8mm, and the pile
is settled by vibratory hammering. The perimeter of the pile U=1.9782m, and the pile end area
A=0.0156m2.
The maximum force of a single steel pipe pile is 69.2T.
According to the geological conditions, the steel pipe pile is 4.5 meters into the clay layer, and the bearing
capacity of a single pile is.
[ρ]= 1 U  f Li  λpAR 
i
2

 1.9782  [16  1  (40  8)  (75  4.5)  0.0156  1400

1

2
=695KN
[ρ]==695KN
The load Pmax is greater than that of the steel pipe pile, which can meet the requirements.

- 17 -
 3、LONGITUDINAL BEAM

The maximum stress of the longitudinal beam is 156Mpa＜[σ]=215Mpa, which meets the stress
requirements.

。
The maximum deflection is 11.4mm<[f]=6000/400=15mm, which meets the deflection requirements.

4、reverse channel steel

- 18 -
 The maximum stress of the reverse channel steel is 181 Mpa＜[σ]=215Mpa, which meets the stress
requirements.

3.3 STEEL PLATFORM CALCULATION

3.3.1 CALCULATION METHOD AND CONTENT

This calculation model adopts MIADAS finite element program and establishes a space model
according to the actual structure of the steel platform for overall analysis and calculation. In order to
ensure the consistency between the model and the actual forces, the lateral distribution beams on the
bridge deck and the Bailey beams are connected by hinges, and the bottom of the steel pipe piles are
consolidated.
As a drilling platform, according to the location of the transportation vehicle, calculates the working
conditions as follows:
Working condition 1: The drilling rig, crane, and tanker work at the same time.
Working condition 2: The steel cage is lifted by a crane.
Main calculation content: the overall strength and rigidity of the main structure of the steel platform.

3.3.2 LOAD COMBINATION

Partial load value
① Self-weight of trestle bridge
The self-weight of the structure is considered in the calculation model according to 7.85t/m3.
② Vehicle load
The traffic loads considered for construction are: 10m³ concrete mixer truck with full load (including
concrete) 50T, 80T-ton crawler crane, 280-type rotary drill (self-weight 85t), considering the most
unfavorable situation, and passing at the same time, so the calculated load is 85T rotary Drilling, 80T-ton

- 19 -
crawler cranes, and concrete mixer trucks are allocated as follows: Rotary drilling and crawler cranes are
arranged in the drilling platform, and crawler cranes are arranged on the side of the platform.

② Material accumulated load

The pile load is 20KN/m2 and is arranged on the other side of the platform.

3.3.3 Load sub-factor

Live load sub-factor: 1.4;
Constant load sub-factor: 1.2;

6.3.4 荷载组合 Load combination

According to 3.1.5 of "Code for Design of Steel Structures" (GB50017-2003).
Strength calculation: ①+②+③

Stiffness checking calculation: ①+②

Namely strength load: P=1.2P1+1.4P2+1.4P3, stiffness load: P=P1+P2
According to the above load calculation, load it into the MIDAS model, as follows.

3.3.5 CALCULATION RESULT OF ALL COMPONENTS

3.3.5.1 SUBSTRUCTURE
1、PIPE PILE
WORK CONDITION 1

- 20 -
The maximum reaction force of the steel pipe pile is 638.7KN.

The maximum stress of the steel pipe pile is 56.2Mpa＜[σ]=215Mpa, which meets the stress
requirements.
WORK CONDITION 2

- 21 -
 The maximum reaction of the pipe pile is 638.7KN。

The maximum stress of the steel pipe pile is 61.4Mpa＜[σ]=215Mpa, which meets the stress
requirements.

2. PILE TOP CROSS BEAM(WORK CONDITION HAS SLIGHT DIFFERENCE FROM WORK
CONDITON 1 AND 2)

The maximum stress of the pile top beam is 92.0Mpa＜[σ]=215Mpa, which meets the stress
requirements

- 22 -
 The maximum deflection is 3.95mm<[f]=3000/400=7.5mm, which meets the deflection requirements.

3.3.5.2 BELLE BEAM

WORK CONDITION 1
1.REACTION

The maximum stress is 298Mpa<[σ]=310Mpa of the vertical rod at the top of the pile, which meets
the stress requirements

2.变形 DEFORMATION

The maximum deflection is 8.9mm<[f]=6000/400=15mm, which meets the deflection requirements.

- 23 -
 WORK CONDITON 2
1 REACTION

The maximum stress is 258.8Mpa<[σ]=310Mpa for the vertical rod at the top of the pile, which meets
the stress requirements.

2. DEFORMATION

The maximum deflection is 7.3/mm＜[f]=6000/400=15mm, which meets the requirement of deflection.

3.3.5.3 DISTRIBUTION BEAM

WORK CONDITION 1

- 24 -
 The maximum stress of the distribution beam is 90.8Mpa＜[σ]=215Mpa, which meets the stress
requirements.

3.4 CALCULATION OF LIFTING FRAME

3.4.1 CALCULATION METHOD AND CONTENT

This calculation model adopts MIADAS finite element program, and establishes a space model according
to the actual structure of the lifting frame for overall analysis and calculation.
Main calculation content: the overall strength and rigidity of the main structure of the steel platform.
6.4.2 Load combination
Partial load value
① Self-weight of trestle bridge
The self-weight of the structure is considered in the calculation model according to 7.85t/m3.
② Vehicle load
The load of passing vehicles considered for construction is: 50T when the 10m³ concrete mixer truck is
fully loaded (including concrete).
6.4.3 Load sub-factor
Live load sub-factor: 1.4;
Constant load sub-factor: 1.2;
6.4.4 Load combination
According to 3.1.5 of "Code for Design of Steel Structures" (GB50017-2003).
Strength calculation: ①+②

Stiffness checking calculation: ①+②

Namely strength load: P=1.2P1+1.4P2, stiffness load: P=P1+P2
According to the above load calculation, load it into the MIDAS model, as follows.

- 25 -
 2、PILE TOP CROSS BEAM(CONDITION 2 AND CONDITION 2 DIFFERENCE IS SLIGHT)

The maximum stress of the beam at the top of the pile is 159.8Mpa＜[σ]=215Mpa, which meets the
stress requirements.

The maximum deflection is 0.398mm＜[f]=3000/400=7.5mm, which meets the requirement of deflection.

3.4.5 ALL COMPONENETS CALCULATION RESULT

3.4.5.1 BELLE BEAM

1、PRESTRESS

- 26 -
 The maximum stress is 287Mpa<[σ]=310Mpa for the chord beam at the top of the pier, which meets
the stress requirements.

2、DEFORMATION

The maximum deflection is 36mm＜[f]=27000/400=67.5mm, which meets the requirement of

deflection
3.4.5.2 DISTRIBUTION BEAM

- 27 -
 The maximum stress of the distribution beam is 150Mpa＜[σ]=215Mpa, which meets the stress
requirements.

3.4.5.3 BRIDGE DECK

The maximum stress of the transverse distribution beam is 36.2Mpa＜[σ]=215Mpa, which meets the
stress requirements.

3.5 STEEL TUBE CALCULATION

The length of the pile foundation steel tube is determined according to the elevation of the concrete
bottom of the pile cap. The 21# pier steel tube is the longest, the bottom elevation is -26.7m, and the total
length is 31.2m. The following computation will be carried out.

3.5.1 EMBEDDED DEPTH CALCULATION OF STEEL TUBES

The minimum embedding depth of the steel casing is calculated according to the following formula:：
(𝐻 + ℎ)𝛾𝑤 − 𝐻𝛾0
𝐿=
𝛾𝑑 − 𝛾𝑤
In the formula: L——embedded depth of protective tube (m);
H——The depth from the construction water level to the bed surface (m). According to the survey, the
construction water level is +1.00m, so H is taken as 15.735m;

- 28 -
h——The water head in the protective tube, that is, the difference between the water level in the
protective tube and the construction water level (m). Because the top elevation of the protective tube is
+4.50m, h is taken as 3.3m;
γw——The bulk density of the mud in the protective cylinder, which is taken as 11KN/m3;
γ0——The bulk density of water, which is 10KN/m3;
γd——the saturated bulk density of the soil layer of the outer bed of the protective tube, taken as
16KN/m3
Then the minimum embedding depth L of 21# pier steel protective tube is:
L=[(15.735+3.3)×11-15.735×10]/(16-11)=10.407m

3.5.2 DRVING DEPTH OF STEEL TUBES

The minimum embedding depth of the 21# pier steel protective tube is 10.407m; the designed
penetration depth of the protective tube is 11.965m, which meets the requirements;
The effective embedded depth value is: 2(d+1)=2×(2.2+1)=6.4m;
The friction resistance of the soil around the steel tube
R=fuL(Kpa)
In the formula, R——the frictional resistance of soil;
f——Dynamic friction resistance per unit area (KPa) (according to the geological survey report,
take 70Kpa);
u——the peripheral length of the steel protective tube (m);
L——The depth of penetration of the steel casing (m);
Then: R =70×3.14×2.224×10.407=5087KN
During construction, a 120t hydraulic vibrating hammer is used to vibrate to the design position.

3.5.3 STEEL TUBE STRENGTH CALCULATION

The most unfavorable working condition of the steel casing is to withstand the vibration force of the 120
vibrating hammer during the rapping process (calculated at 120t pressure).
Sectional area of steel protective tube: A =834cm2
Then the compressive stress б=1200×10/834=14.39MPa≤[б]=188 MPa, which meets the requirements.

3.5.4 STEEL TUBE STRESS INTERGRITY CALCULATION

Slenderness ratio of steel tube λ=L/i
L is the length from the top of the steel protective tube to the effective embedded depth of the steel
protective tube in the soil. The top elevation of the steel protective tube is +4.50m, the minimum elevation
of the river bed of Pier 21 is -14.735m, and the effective embedded depth value is:
2(d+1)=2×(2.2+1)=6.4m
Then L=4.5-(-14.735)+6.4=25.635m=2563.5cm,
𝑖 = √𝐼 ⁄𝐴

In the formula: i——radius of gyration (cm);

- 29 -
 I——Moment of inertia, I=(222.44-2204)/64=1623526cm4;
A——cross-sectional area, A=3.14×(111.22-1102)=834cm2
Therefore i=44.12
Therefore, λ=2563.5/44.12=58.10
Calculate the overall stability as follows:
N/(ΦA)≤f

In the formula: N——the exciting vibration force of the steel casing, which is taken as 1200KN;
A——The cross-sectional area of the steel protective tube, based on the above calculation, which is taken
as 834cm2;
Φ——stability coefficient of the axial force-bearing member, in the table Φ=0.89
Then N/(ΦA)=1200×10/(0.89×834)=16.17MPa＜[б]=188 MPa, which meets the requirements.

CAO YUNGAN
FIELD OF EXPERTISE: STRUCTURAL
PRC No. STP-OCE-D-No. 2023-211

- 30 -
- 31 -