FieldtripGuide Colombia11
FieldtripGuide Colombia11
Prepared by
VINASCO, C.; WEBER, M.; CARDONA, A.; AREIZA, M.; RESTREPO, S.; PINDELL, J.; PARDO, A.; TORO,L.;
LARA, M..
Field Trip September 3-5 2011
GEOLOGICAL TRANSECT THROUGH AN ACCRETIONARY MARGIN,
WESTERN COLOMBIA
VINASCO, C.1; WEBER, M.2; CARDONA, A.3; AREIZA, M.4; RESTREPO, S.5; PINDELL, J.6; PARDO, A.7;
TORO,L.8; LARA, M.9.
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Santa Fe de Antioquia
ANTIOQUIA
COLOMBIA 2011
Contents
Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................................... 3
Thanks to the efforts of many workers in different geological disciplines, our understanding of the
Caribbean regional tectonic evolutionary framework has evolved to the point where predictions may
now be made for the finer-scale evolution of more local areas around the Caribbean. One such area is
Colombia (northern Andes), and the integration of specific aspects of Colombian geology within the
Caribbean framework is leading to new levels of understanding for Colombia’s tectonic and basinal
evolution.
Evolving concepts of Caribbean evolution since 1970 show advantages of considering regional
evolution in the mantle reference frame, because subducted slabs in the mantle can only migrate
forward/backward at a fraction of plate motion rates. Thus, the “room” for error in tectonic models is
much less (Pindell and Kennan, 2009). From Triassic to Early Cretaceous, northern South America
remained attached to northern Africa, with both continental blocks moving little relative to the mantle.
This contrasts strongly with North America’s Late Triassic-Jurassic and later NW-ward migration from
northern Africa, which led to rifting and drifting between the Americas. At a finer scale, this is believed
to have led to rifting and drifting between Colombia and the continental blocks of southern
Mexico/Chortis/Yucatán. This created a western segment of the Proto-Caribbean Seaway, which Pindell
(1993) called the Colombian Marginal Seaway. In the Aptian (~125 Ma), opening of the Equatorial
Atlantic began, and northern South America has migrated westward across the mantle ever since then.
Thus, the Jurassic-Neocomian extensional tectonism of Colombia became compressional, and offshore
subduction systems and intra-arc basins along the northern Andes were thrown into E-W or SW-NE
compression (sensu Dewey, 1980), with a probable dextral strike slip component. This long-lived
compressive period comprises unique phases of convergent tectonic style between the NW corner of
South America (Colombian continental promontory) and lithosphere that was either driven by, or
directly belonged to, the Caribbean Plate.
In Early to Middle Jurassic, granitic intrusives were produced and cooled in a “Central Cordilleran” belt
from Guajira into Ecuador, usually presumed to be arc magmas resulting from E-dipping subduction.
However, they may relate to rifting within a zone of crustal anatexis caused by Alleghanian-Gondwanan
crustal thickening of Late Paleozoic arc-related terrane. Following the arc model, the opening of an
The NW-ward flight of North America probably created an archipelago underlain by arc, oceanic, and
continental blocks, torn from from Mexico and Chortis, stretching along a SE-trending and lengthening
sinistral shear zone/transform to South America. This shear zone may have ended at the north Andean
Trench, which at the latitude of Colombia, was likely situated outboard of an intra-arc basin (Pindell et al.
2011), which can be called the Quebradagrande Basin. If our confidence about the existence of an arc
outboard of that basin increases, then that arc might be called the Quebradagrande Arc, which now
comprises a terrane known along the Cauca Valley of Colombia.
When the opening of the Equatorial Atlantic began at 125 Ma, we can predict a resultant end of back arc
basin development, and the onset of north Andean compression. A simple way to view the effect of this
development is that this basin and its supposed outlying Quebradagrande Arc began to collapse,
achieved by dextral and W-dipping “subduction” within the backarc basin. This could have proceeded
until the Central Cordilleran margin (former remnant arc) choked the trench during arc collision. Such a
history has been well documented on Margarita (Venezuela), which has been interpreted to host a
far-travelled portion of the HPLT metamorphic belt that was created by this event (Maresch, this volume;
Maresch et al., 2009; Maresch et al., 2010). In additioin, the arc-continent collision appears to have
involved propagation of transpressive faults into the continental margin, parts of which were uplifted
and cooled around 115 Ma (Villagomez, 2010) as they were carried northward along orogen-parallel
shears. However, E-dipping subduction of the Farallon Plate from outside (west of ) the Quebradagrande
Arc, marked by the Arquia HPLT complex, probably continued throughout closure of the weak backarc
basin, and then continued after arc accretion from the Albian on. This view suggests that young, weak
backarc basins can close without causing interference to the primary outboard subduction zone, where
presumably stronger crust is subducted.
The Caribbean-Colombian intra-oceanic plateau (CCOP) then formed on Farallon crust from about
110-88 Ma (Kerr, 2003; J. Wright, pers. com., 2011) and progressively converged with Colombia, accreting
slices of the plateau into a wide subduction prism as it encountered the E-dipping trench outboard the
Quebradagrande/Arquia belts. Subduction-related magmas intruded inner parts of this prism (e.g., Buga
Batholith) and adjacent continental margin (e.g., Antioquia and other batholiths) from about 100-74 Ma.
Margarita was situated beyond the northern end of this setting, where a lengthening NE-trending
dextral shear zone connected the Colombian trench to the eastern, W-dipping, Caribbean trench. The
CCOP followed Margarita in this northerly position, and, like Margarita, began to receive Caribbean
arc magmas (i.e., due to subduction of Proto-Caribbean crust) by 89 Ma as the Great Caribbean Arc was
lengthened in the southerly direction to include the Aves Ridge, Margarita and the Leeward Antilles, by
a combination of (1) dextral shear and arc-parallel extension, and (2) the simple fact that these terranes
The Late Cretaceous Andean setting of plateau subduction/accretion prevailed until the Maastrichtian,
during which upper crustal components (CCOP) were accreted (Western Cordillera) while deeper Farallon
crust and upper mantle continued to subduct and produce arc magmas (Antioquia). In the
Paleocene-Eocene, Andean “Laramide” orogenesis began due to (1) acceleration of Caribbean orthogonal
subduction once the Greater Antilles had encountered the Bahamas and could not move NE relative to
the Americas any longer (Pindell and Kennan, 2009); and (2) westward acceleration of South America
across the mantle, which further threw the Andes into compression (Pindell and Tabbutt, 1995). By the
Middle Eocene, much of Colombia had become subaerial with multi-kilometric uplift and erosion of
material from the Colombian hanging wall (Central Cordillera, Lower Mag basement, Santa Marta and
Guajira) as it was more effectively telescoped across the trace of the Caribbean Benioff Zone, thereby
effecting flat slab subduction. Cenozoic Caribbean arc magmas appear to be limited to Early Paleogene
partial melts (re-melts, hence tonalite) of downgoing slab in the Santa Marta region (Cardona et al., 2010).
Late Eocene reduction of plate convergence rate allowed deposition to resume in Colombia (Pindell and
Tabbutt, 1995), but by the Late Oligocene, the Caribbean’s relatively buoyant west-facing arc ridge
(Panama) began to enter and choke the trench. This, combined with rejuvenated plate compression at 25
Ma as a result of another westward acceleration by South America (Pindell and Tabbutt, 1995), initiated
the “Andean” Orogeny that persists today.
A key issue regarding our perception of the tectonic style of Andean orogenesis, as well as the
pre-Neogene palinspastic reconstruction, is the amount of strike slip on the Santa Marta, Ibague, Oca, and
collective Mérida Andes faults. Estimates of shortening in the Eastern Cordillera range from perhaps 50 to
250 km (!), but the fact remains that if Campbell’s (1965) original estimate of 110 km for slip on the Santa
Marta Fault is correct, then there must be AT LEAST that much shortening in the Eastern Cordillera
because the fault is effectively a lateral ramp to Eastern Cordilleran thrusts. There is no sense further
suggesting a low shortening value for the Eastern Cordillera until a correspondingly low offset for the
Santa Marta Fault is accepted, which is not yet the case and it is this writer’s present opinion (Pindell) that
this will not be forthcoming. Resolving these incompatibilities is an important area for continued work.
Some the critical points and areas for debate of the above discussion can be highlighted by the
following questions, which can be taken up in discussion on the field trip.
1. Was there a Jurassic continental arc along Guajira-Central Cordillera? If so, then where was
Mexico/Chortis, OR, where was Guajira/Central Cordillera?
3. Can we reconcile Central Cordilleran uplift data with the Aptian arc-continent collision model for
Quebradagrande?
4. Above, initial accretion of CCOP is suggested by Albian, so that arc magmatism within CCOP can be
driven by east-dipping subduction. This avoids the speculation of a west-dipping subduction system
along the eastern flank of the CCOP AS it was formed, as demanded by Kerr (e.g., 2003) and the lack of arc
contamination of in the CCOP. Can we prove that accretion of CCOP began this early? Can we accept that
Buga and Antioquia and all the other Upper Cretaceous arc plutons pertain to this east-dipping
subduction zone?
5. The outline above places the Margarita HPLT rocks at the north end of the Quebradagrande back arc
basin upon its closure, and the Arquia HPLT rocks OUTSIDE of the Quebradagrande arc. However, is it
possible that Margarita and Arquia are related, and that Margarita needs to lie outboard of the arc too?
Or that Arquia was originally situated inboard of the Quebradagrande arc?
6. Where is the southeastern terminus of the Panama Ridge (and arc)? Are the Dabeiba Arch and the
Eocene Mande Batholith definitely part of the Panama magmatic arc? Does Panama continue south past
Buenaventura all the way to the Piñon Terrane of Ecuador as suggested by Pindell and Kennan (2009)?
This implies that Gorgona and the entire basement of the coastal basins are part of a “Greater Panama
Terrane”. Can we disprove this? And if we entertain it, how does the Miocene Nazca Plate-related
magmatic arc propagate all the way to the Combia Valley? Is there not a problem with subcreted
Caribbean lithosphere underlying the arc trend? Or, has the Caribbean slab broken off and subducted far
beneath Colombia-Ecuador, such that the “Greater Panama Terrane” is merely an accreted terrane now, no
long connected to the slab? And if this is so, then the Nazca arc does NOT need to cut up through the
Caribbean lithosphere. Perhaps the slab tearing northwards, and the point of tearing is just reaching the
Mande Batholith area?
Over the last five years, new radiometric, geochemical and field data has enabled the revision of current
geodynamic models for the northwestern Andean and Caribbean realms, allowing to readdress long-
standing and important questions regarding subduction-accretion models. Such questions include: the
nature of accreted terranes; the growth of batholiths within continental and oceanic plates; and the role
of major shear zones responsible for the redistribution of litho-tectonic elements in the margin.
Physiographically speaking the westernmost segment of the Colombian Andes encompasses the Central
and Western Cordillera as well as the Atrato basin and the Baudó Ranges (Fig. 1).
Fig 1. Neotectonic map of the Northern Andes indicating the main active fault systems (after Taboada et al., 2000). Solid arrows
indicate plate velocity relative to South American Plate. BR=Baudo Range, CB=Chocó Block, CC=Central Cordillera, EC=Eastern
Cordillera, GF=Guaicaramo Fault, MA=Merida Andes, MB=Maracaibo Block, PR=Perija Range, RFS=Romeral Fault System, SLR=San
Lucas Range, SM=Santander Massif, SSM=Servitá–Sta. Maria Fault, WC=Western Cordillera.
Despite the complex distribution of reported ages for the Central Cordillera block, which suggests the
presence of pre-Mesozoic constituents, an Upper Paleozoic – Lower Mesozoic event is perhaps the most
important orogenic event recorded for the block. This event could be associated with the build up of
Pangea driven by the collision between Laurentia and Gondwana during the Alleghenian orogeny (Vinasco
et al., 2006), and is responsible for the subsequent closure of the proto Atlantic ocean (Pindell and Dewey,
1982; Pindell, 1985; Pindell and Kennan, 2002). The Triassic tectonic regime recorded for the Pueblito
Diorite (Fig. 2, # 6) suggests a dominant left lateral regime by this time, in contrast to the dextral dominant
regime for the Cretaceous.
The Central Cordillera block has been described and given various names through time including:
Cajamarca Group (Nelson, 1957); Cajamarca Complex (Maya and González, 1995); the Tahamí terrane
(Toussaint and Restrepo, 1989); the Central Cordillera Polymetamorphic Complex (Toussaint and Restrepo,
1989) and the Cajamarca – Valdivia Terrane (Cediel et al., 2003).
In general the Central Cordillera basement can be regarded as a Paleozoic – Permian metamorphic
sequence, with detrital U/Pb zircon ages ranging from 270-380 Ma, (and a single point about 234 Ma)
(Vinasco et al. in prep.; Villagómez et al., 2008) intruded by crustal syn-tectonic Permian and post tectonic
Triassic granitoids with arc imprints and Jurassic calc-alkaline granites like the Ibague Batholith (160 ± 3
Ma U/Pb)
Other well-documented geochronological events in the region occurred during Devonian and Cretaceous
times (Hall et al., 1972; González, 1980; Toussaint and Restrepo, 1989). This latter event is particularly
relevant, as it includes the extensive Late Cretaceous Antioquia Batholith (Fig. 2, #1), (U/Pb ages between
83.75 ± 0 and 94.5 ± 1.7 Ma (Ibañez-Mejía et al., 2007; Villagómez et a., 2008), which is related to a well-
established western subduction zone characteristic of an active Upper Cretaceous continental margin
(Botero, 1963; Saenz, 2003; Restrepo-Moreno et al., 2009), responsible for regional resetting of the the
K-Ar system.
Discrete Precambrian age populations indicate that the Palaeozoic-Triassic sedimentary rocks were
probably derived from the Guyana Shield and are derived from the South America authoctonous
basement
(Vinasco et al. In prep; Villagómez et al., 2011).
Finally, other events are recorded during the entire Tertiary. These events are mainly associated to
deformational processes, syntectonic sedimentation and Mio-Pliocene volcanism (e.g., the Amagá and
Combia Formations respectively- Fig. 2).
The easternmost trace of the RFS is defined by the San Jerónimo fault (Maya and González, 1995) (Fig. 2
SJF). This fault defines the beginning of a broad boundary that separates the Central Cordillera in the east
from the accreted terranes to the west. Regionally, this broad boundary corresponds to a kilometric shear
zone hosting a series of rocks including: (1) Cretaceous sedimentary-volcanic sequence of the
Quebradagrande Complex (Fig. 2, #7); (2) low grade Devonian(?) metasedimentary rocks of Sinifaná
Metasediments (Fig. 2, #8); (3) mafic and ultramafic Triassic supra subduction intrusives (Fig. 2, #6) and
finally (4) Permian (?) and/or (?) Cretaceous (?) low to medium grade meta vulcano-sedimentary N-MORB
type sequences of the Arquía Complex (Fig.2, #5). The Amagá Formation, a coal-bearing, Oligo-Miocene
sedimentary sequence (Grosse, 1926; Silva et al., 2008) unconformably covers the older lithological units.
Mio-Pliocene volcanic and subvolcanic rocks of the Combia Formation covered and intruded the Amagá
Formation and other older rocks. Geometrically, the RFS shear zone is characterized by an anastomosed
arrange of faults yielding a block tectonics configuration. The rocks and structures inside the shear zone
are the main focus of the field trip.
The accreted Cretaceous terranes occur to the west of the regional RFS (Cauca-Almaguer Fault) in the
western flank of the Central Cordillera (Fig. 2 CAF). They consist of basalts, gabbros, ultramafic cumulates
and flysh-type sedimentary rocks (Amaime Formation, Bolívar Complex, Volcanic and Barroso Formation.),
which are characterized by flat mantle-normalized REE patterns (Kerr et al., 1997, Villagómez et al. 2011)
representing a portion of the large late-Cretaceous Colombian-Caribbean Oceanic Plateau CCCP (Kerr et
al., 1997). These rocks have available radiometric ages about 95 Ma (U-Pb in zircon, Bolivar Complex)
(Villagómez et al., 2011) and Ar-Ar ages between 84-90 Ma (Barroso and Amaime Formations) (González,
in prep.). Several authors have used radiometric and biostratigraphic evidence to show that the plateau
rocks exposed in the Caribbean, Colombia and Ecuador (and elsewhere) range between 92 and 88 Ma
(Kerr et al., 1997; Kerr et al., 1999; Sinton et al., 1997, 1998; Luzieux et al., 2006; Vallejo et al., 2009) with a
minor pulse at 76–72 Ma (Kerr et al., 1997). In a recent model presented by Serrano et al. (2011), the authors
argument that the CCCP formed when the proto-Caribbean Arc intersected the Great Caribbean Arc, and
suggest the possibility that that an oceanic slab window setting alone may be responsible for its formation.
The boundary with the meta-vulcano sedimentary sequences of the Arquía Complex is not clear. Recently,
García et al. (2010) suggested that the westernmost metabasic rocks of the Arquía Complex are transitional
to volcanic rocks of the western Cordillera implying that at least some components of the Arquía complex
belong to this sequence.
Late Cretaceous to early Cenozoic tectonic evolution of the northern South American margin was controlled
by its interaction with the margins of an allochthonous, anomalously thick Caribbean oceanic plate and its
associated arc (Burke, 1988; ; Pindell et al., 1998; Montes et al., 2005; Spikings et al., 2005; Luzieux et al., 2006;
Vallejo et al., 2006; Maresh et al., 2009; Weber et al., 2009, Kerr et al., 1997; Cardona et al., 2011). Timing of
accretion is constrained by the Buga Batolith, which yields an U-Pb age of c. 90 Ma, the Santa Fe Batholith,
which yields an Ar-Ar age of c. 92 Ma (Weber et al., 2011), and the Córdoba Batholith which yields an U-Pb
age of c. 80 Ma and 85 Ma (Villagómez et al., 2011; González et al., in prep.). This magmatism represents the
initial stages of island arc activity that formed at the juvenile active margin of the eastward migrating CCOP
(Villagómez et al., 2011). This magmatic event is also registered in the southern Caribbean by the Aruba
Additionally, several preliminary fission track (FT) ages presented by Villagómez et al. (2011) for the Central
Cordillera ranging between 77 and 36 Ma and results from best-fit modelling, indicate rapid cooling
between 80 and 70 Ma, followed by slower cooling from 70 to 10 Ma indicative of an important tectonic
event. This event produced exhumation in the paleocontinental margin during the late Cretaceous
associated to the accretion of the CCOP (Villagómez et al., 2011). In Ecuador, accretion occurred in
Campanian – Mastrichtian times (75-65 Ma), slightly later than in Colombia (Vallejo et al., 2006).
Tectonostratigraphic evidence and position of depocenter evolution studies for Colombia suggest that the
regional axis of deposition had a tectonic origin and migrated eastward with gradual uplift of the Central
Cordillera, evidenced by westerly derived coarse clastic sediments (the Campanian ‘El Cobre’ Sandstone
and the Maastrichtian Monserrate, La Tabla and Cimarrona formations) (Villamil, 1999). During the
Cretaceous–Tertiary boundary, parts of the eastern margin of the Eastern Cordillera were uplifted. This
event is evidenced by a regional paraconformity in Colombia, by a localized unconformity in the present-
day Llanos foothills and by a localized unconformity in the Barinas Basin (Villamil, 1999). In the Sierra
Nevada Province, to the north of the country, exhumation at elevated rates are recorded during 65-58 Ma
in response to the accretion of the Caribbean Colombian Oceanic Province.
Regional reconstructions given by Pindell (in prep.) involve the eastward subduction of Farallon plate under
the continental margin represented by the Central Cordillera. Oceanward, back-stepping of the slab during
the earliest Cretaceous due to fragmentation of the Jurassic slab is bracketed by Ar-Ar cooling ages
obtained from crystalline rocks located to the south of Ibagué fault about ~133–139 Ma (Villagomez, et al.
2011). These cooling ages are contemporaneous with the cessation of Jurassic arc-magmatism, which
gave rise to the early Cretaceous Quebradagrande oceanic arc sequence (Villagomez, et al., 2011). The
collision of the Quebradagrande arc against the margin was accompanied by the obduction of medium-
high P–T metamorphic rocks of the Arquía Complex, which are probably a relict of the late Jurassic - early
Cretaceous subduction channel (Villagomez, et al., 2011). These arcs were closed against the Central
Cordillera and continuous subduction lasting until 70 Ma. The SJF would be formed during this time by the
accretion of the complex onto the continent, which occurred between 117–107 Ma based on
thermochronological data (Villagomez et al., 2011). The Sabaletas greenchists (Arquia complex) with Ar-Ar
plateau age of 127±5 Ma and integrated ages between 102-115 Ma (Vinasco, 2001) eventually record this
episode.
Concurrently, offshore in the Pacific, the Caribbean-Colombian Oceanic Plateau (CCOP) was being extruded
at intra-oceanic hotspots onto the Farallon lithosphere from 100 to 88 Ma (Kerr et al., 2003). Alternative
models, invoking an oceanic slab windows mechanism are presented by Serrano et al., (2011) to explain
the origin of the CCOP, with no mandatory presence of an asthenospheric plume. The eastward dipping
subduction of Farallon crust beneath the now composite terranes of Colombia allowed the plateau to
converge against the Colombian margin. The Farallon lithosphere continued to be subducted beneath the
accreted upper crustal material, albeit at a low dipping Benioff Plane. Panamanian subduction began in the
Maastrichtian, thus isolating a Caribbean Plate out of the Farallon.
On the other hand, Moreno Sánchez et al. (2007) stands that there is not prove of the existence of any
metamorphic basement to the west of the Quebradagrande Complex. Instead, they invoke the presence
of a magmatic arc in that position.
Finally, a complete different line of argumentation for the origin of the Caribbean plate is given by James
(2006) who suggests an inter-American origin for the plate. Arguments are based mainly in the existence
of coeval of Caribbean and neighbouring continental areas of regional deposits of Albian shallow water
limestones, Paleocene - Middle Eocene flysch deposits, Middle Eocene limestones, and the presence of a
regional Late Eocene hiatus compatible with an inter-American location, not with a changing Pacific-
Caribbean development. Additionally, the internal structural conformity of the Caribbean Plate and of the
Maya and Chortis blocks with regional geology of Middle America shows that no major migrations or
rotations have occurred (James, K., 2006), aspects invoked by models of pacific origin
Subsequent Palaeogene orogenic phases seem to be related to variations in plate convergence (velocity
and angle) or to accretionary phenomena (Pindell et al., 1998; Restrepo-Moreno et al., 2009; Vallejo et al.,
2009; Jaillard et al., 2010). Cardona et al. (2011) suggest magmatic quiescence and block uplift after 50 Ma
as a product of shallow subduction and oblique convergence. However, a pulse of exhumation is recorded
during 50-40 Ma due to underthrusting of the Caribbean Plate beneath northern South America
(Villagómez et al., 2011). The Central Cordillera exhumed at moderate rates during the Eocene (~45–30 Ma),
which is also observed over widely dispersed regions along the Andean chain. The greatest amount of
middle - late Miocene exhumation occurred in southern Colombia, and spatially corresponds with
elevated exhumation rates in northern Ecuador in response to collision and subduction of the buoyant
Carnegie Ridge (Villagómez et al., 2011).
During the Tertiary, South America overthrust more and more the Caribbean Plate in a flat slab geometry.
Thus, after accretion of the Western Cordillera at the start of this overthrusting, first the Central Cordillera
(Paleocene-Middle Eocene; Laramide) and then the Eastern Cordillera (Late Oligocene-Miocene; early
Andean) have been thrust over the eastern leading edge of the underthrusted Caribbean lithosphere.
Presently, seismic tomography indicates that the Caribbean slab occurs beneath northern Colombia all
the way to the Llanos Basin (Van der Hilst and Mann, 1994). Final episodes of deformation in the chain are
related to the collision of the Panama-Choco block in Early Miocene-early Pliocene (Pennington, 1981;
Toussaint and Restrepo, 1988; Duque-Caro, 1990; Mann and Corrigan, 1990; Van der Hilst and Mann, 1994;
Taboada et al., 2000; Trenkamp et al., 2002). Collision drives changes in the RFS kinematics from right-lateral
in the south to left-lateral in the north (Suter el at, 2008). The Panamá-Chocó block collides with NW South
America in an E to ESE direction (Duque-Caro, 1990; Taboada et al., 2000). It is considered as a rigid indenter,
which induces deformations north of 5°N reaching the lowlands of the Eastern Cordillera some 600 km east
(Suter, et al. 2008). The collision is considered to be responsible for the latest and major phase of uplift in the
Colombian Andes which corresponds to the Andean tectonic phase that affected the three cordilleras
(Taboada et al., 2000; Cortes et al., 2005).
Zircon U-Pb anlyses in metasedimentary samples of the Cajamarca Complex in the area of interest show
important differences in U-Pb age distribution diagrams. Metapsamite MS001B near Palmitas (Est. 1, Fig. 3),
registers an important input of Paleozoic ages, whereas metapsamite ARQ-14 near Sucre (Est. 9, Fig. 4),
displays a significant Permo-Triassic signature. In contrast, metapsamite COLC-56 from the southeast of
Medellin (Fig. 5) virtually lacks any Phanerozoic input, being the younger age obtained ~530 Ma. These
preliminary results indicate an intricate spatio-temporal pattern of metamorphic rocks in the paleomargin
related to a complex geologic history.
Fig 3. U-Pb distribution ages for metapsamite of Cajamarca Complex, La Cajetilla sector.
Fig 5. U-Pb distribution ages for Ancon Schist - Caldas sector (La Miel creek)
Pre-Andean structures were subsequently deformed during the Andean cycle in Miocene times, which mark t
he arrival of western oceanic terrenes in the final closure of the Panamá isthmus. The structural style is
dominated for tight isoclinal folds with vertical axial planes, east vergent thrusts and west vergent back
thrusts characterizing the nor-western margin of the Central Cordillera of Colombia.
The Sinifaná metadesiments encompass a variety of rocks such as silts, slates, metagrawackes, metapsamites, and
quartzites metamorphosed up to greenschist facies conditions (González, 2000), although sometimes they appear
as very low-grade metasediments.
Recent data obtained from a sample collected near the town of Sucre in the quebrada Seca (zircon U-Pb ages (in situ)
for 37 laser spots) (Fig. 6) indicate an important contribution of Permo-Triassic input, since about 30% of data
correspond to this period. This implies a younger age than traditionally considered for this sequence. Sinifana
metasediments, at least in this area, pose a Triassic maximum age for sedimentation. Two younger zircon ages of
about 160 Ma and 73 Ma are considered as meaningless on the basis of statistical uncertainty. New geochronological
data is currently being generated in order to help to constrain the possible meaning of such younger ages. There is
also a significant Neoproterozoic and Grenvillian contribution to the sediments, and an almost absence of the
Paleozoic record (except by a single age of roughly 450 Ma), suggesting that these rocks formed in proximity to the
continental South American margin, configuring an autochthonous or para-autochthonous basin position. The lack
of Paleozoic ages could imply absence of Paleozoic massifs at this margin.
Fig 6. U-Pb distribution ages for low grade metasediments of Sinifana Schist
The age assigned to the sequence based on relationship with The Amagá Stock must be revised. However, it is
possible that the sample collected in La Seca creek, some miles north of the main body belongs to a different unit.
This is a plausible explanation because at this point it is likely that the mapped Sinifaná Metasediments comprises
several units not yet individualized.
Epidote-garnet amphibolite rocks from the Arquía complex (central Colombia) are composed of magnesio
hornblende + garnet + epidote + quartz + plagioclase + calcite, plus rutile + titanite + apatite as accessory
phases. The rocks are fine- to medium-grained, with grains up to 1 mm in size, though grain size reduction
is related to foliation development during an intense and retrograde deformation stage overprinting an earlier
higher-T foliation. Locally, fine veins of leucocratic materials appear parallel to the main foliation, suggesting
partial melting of amphibolite. The cores of magnesiohornblende are relatively rich in AlVI, NaB and Ti (1.01,
0.49 and 0.06 apfu, atoms per formula units, respectively), approaching barroisite composition, while
retrograde amphibole is actinolite (AlVI<0.26, NaB<0.15 and Ti<0.02 apfu). Garnet porphyroblasts are
euhedral, partly replaced by chlorite, and rich in almandine (Xalm=0.46-0.60) and grossular (Xgrs=0.25-0.32).
Plagioclase is mostly albitic, locally reaching oligioclase composition (max. Xan=0.18). Epidote is clinozoisite
with Xpistacite up to 0.27. Thermobarometric calculations indicate peak metamorphic conditions of ca. 630
± 30 ºC and 10.5 ± 1.2 kbar, close to the wet solidus for basaltic rocks and in agreement with melting at peak
conditions. The apparent geothermal gradient at peak conditions suggests a collision-related metamorphic
event, probably related to collision and obduction of the Caribbean-Colombian Oceanic Plateau during the
late Cretaceous.
Similar intrusive units to the south, which include the Cambumbia stock suggest the presence of an
extensive Triassic magmatic belt, which affected the lithologic units mainly of the Arquía complex (Aspden
et al., 1987).
The southern part of the body is uplifted against Oligo-Miocene sedimentary Amagá Formation while to
the northern termination seems to thin out and disappear under the Cenozoic sedimentary cover.
Emplacement models presented by Rodriguez et al. (2010), indicates a NW-SE general transpresive regime
in a subduccion environment. The fabric is mainly magmatic with some evidence of deformational
component implying sintectonism during the final stages of regional deformation. Contact metamorphism,
the presence of diorite dikes and schist roof pendants characterize an intrusive contact between the
Pueblito Diorite and the Sabaletas Schist (i.e. Arquía Complex?).
These rocks are composed of olivine + tremolite ± spinel ± chromite (Acevedo et al., 2011), indicating that
they suffered metamorphic conditions in the range 600-700 ºC. The presence of tremolite also suggests that
Cpx was a stable phase in the protolith, and the lack of anthophyllite suggests pressures above 6 kbar.
Further retrogression and hydration is denoted by partial to total replacement by serpentine minerals.
The depositional environments deduced from the sedimentary rocks vary from fluvial, coastal, coarse grained
deltas, platform (Rodríguez and Rojas, 1985), slope and submarine fans associated with volcanism (Gómez et al.,
1995). The composition of the clastic fragments suggests a continental margin to the east (see Rodríguez and
Rojas, 1985 and Gómez et al., 1995) and strong volcanic influence to the west (“Western” Interval of Gómez et al.,
1995). Nivia et al. (2006) demonstrated that the basalts mostly display calc-alkaline affinities typical of volcanic
rocks generated in supra-subduction zone mantle wedges, in an island arc, marginal basin, or active continental
margin, independent of the Caribbean-Colombian Cretaceous Igneous Province (CCCIP of Kerr et al., 1997). Some
basalts and gabbros of the Quebradagrande Complex located along the western flank of the Central Cordillera
are characterized by flat to positive slopes on chondrite-normalized REE plots (La/Yb 0.8-1.1), high Zr/Th ratios
(>650) and low Th/Co ratios (<0.004) that are indicative of a depleted mantle source origin such as at a mid-
oceanic ridge, or perhaps enriched ORB material (Villagómez et al., 2011). All basaltic andesites and andesites
and a diorite studied by Villagómez (2011) are less altered and metamorphosed than the basalts and gabbros.
These magmatic rocks differ from the previous group because they yield negative Nb–Ta and Ti anomalies on
a primitive-mantle normalized multi-element plot, high La/Yb ratios of 7.9-26.9, low Zr/Th values (<55) and Th
abundances of >1ppm, suggesting they are petrogenetically related to subduction and have a calc-alkaline
signature (Villagómez et al., 2011).
Based on fossil remains a Berriasian-Albian (140-100 Ma) age is proposed (González, 1980; Botero and González,
1983; Etayo-Serna, 1985; Gómez et al., 1995). Euhedral zircon crystals from a metatuff of the Quebradagrande
Complex, yields a zircon U–Pb age of 114.3±3.8 Ma (Villagómez et al., 2011), which overlaps with early
Cretaceous fossil ages indicated above. Euhedral, zoned zircons from the Córdoba granodiorite, which intrudes
the Quebradagrande Complex along the western flank of the Central Cordillera, yielded a mean age of 79.7±2.5
Ma, which is considered to represent the time of emplacement (Villagómez et al, 2011). New U/Pb LA-ICP-MS
analysis (Pardo et al., in preparation) in detrital circon performed in the quartz rich unit in the Manizales area
yielded three main age populations: 1) Carboniferous-Triassic (220-300 Ma), 2) Neoproterozoic-Ordovician
(440-600 Ma) which can be associated with the Tahami Terrane basement (cf. Toussaint, 1996) (e.g. Paleozoic
orthogneisses and schists of the Cajamarca Complex) and 3) Mesoproterozoic (1000 -1100 Ma), probably
derived from the Grenville-related rocks from the eastern Andes. In contrast, the western volcanic deposits
contain mainly a Cenomanian-Aptian (95-115 Ma) population, derived from the lower cretaceous Caribbean
volcanic arc. A minor proportion of Triassic-Late Permian (220-270 Ma) and Ordovician-Cambrian (460-500 Ma)
detrital zircon populations could indicate the influence of the Central Cordillera basement in the sedimentary
record at least at 100 Ma (Albian) in the western part of the Quebradagrande Complex. Currently, two main
hypotheses have been proposed for the origin of the Quebradagrande Complex: 1) An intracratonic marginal
basin produced by spreading-subsidence, where the progressive thinning of the lithosphere generated
gradually deeper sedimentary environments, eventually resulting in the generation of oceanic crust (Nivia et al.,
2006). 2) An accretionary complex composed of passive-margin deposits (organic mudrocks and quartz-rich
sediments), a volcanic arc and some portions of the Proto-Caribbean Plate, which were accreted to the NW
border of South America during the uppermost Early-Late Cretaceous (Moreno-Sánchez & Pardo-Trujillo, 2003;
Pindell & Kennan, 2009;.Villagómez, 2011).
Fig 7. Cauca River Valley near La Pintada (Ant.). Landscape is formed by the Mio-Pliocene Combia Formation and
Oligo-Miocene sediments of the Amagá Formation (low lands).
An important sedimentary sequence, which currently occupies the Interandean depression of the Cauca
River (between the Central and Western cordilleras), will be found during the fieldtrip as an interesting
element of the landscape and a fundamental lithologic unit (Fig. 2). It is a narrowly confined, N-S elongate
(less than 25 km wide and 150 km long), segmented, sedimentary basin Oligo-Miocene in age (Fig. 7). This
sequence was meticulously studied by E. Grosse who wrote the seminal report “El Terciario Carbonifero de
Antioquia”(Grosse, 1926). Without major modifications, with regards to its understanding or to the addition
of new stratigraphic differentiation, subsequent studies have suggested several new names. Its current
designation is that of Amagá Formation (Gonzalez, 2001) and it refers to a coal-bearing siliciclastic
succession deposited in a low elevation, fluvial environment (continental). Based on the presence of coal
layers, Grosse (1926) proposed a subdivision of the sequence into three members: lower member
(conglomeratic, no coal), middle member (alternating sandstones and claystones, coal rich), and upper
member (arkosic, no coal layers). Alternative subdivisions have been also proposed (for details see Correa
and Silva, 1999; Sierra et al. 2004). To this date, The AF embodies a dilemma with respect to its evolution
either as an Interandean basin without any marine influence (Campuzano, 1977; Guzmán, 2003; Sierra et al.,
2004; Silva et al., 2008), or as a peneplain (Dueñas, 1986; Grosse, 1926) with a potential for marked marine
influence from the west (Dueñas, 1986; Escobar, 1983; Schuler and Doubinger, 1970; Zegarra, 1993).
The Amagá Formation unconformably overlies the Paleozoic metamorphic basement of the Central
Cordillera of Colombia and is unconformably covered by late Cenozoic volcaniclastic successions from the
Combia and Irra formations (Fig. 2 #9; Fig. 7) (Guzmán, 1991; Guzmán and Sierra, 1984; Hernández, 1998;
Murillo, 1998; Silva et al., 2008). In its current configuration the Amagá Formation is in fault contact, along
the RFS, with Paleozoic turbiditic metasediments (Sinifana metasediments - Fig. 2 #8) and with oceanic
metavolcanic-sedimentary successions from the Arquía Complex (Fig. 2 # 5). It is also in fault contact with
volcano-sedimentary successions and ultramafic rocks of oceanic affinity Jurassic–Cretaceous in age e.g.,
the Cañas Gordas and Quebrada Grande complexes, and with Triassic S-type intrusives such as the Amagá
Pluton and the Pueblito Diorite. (Fig. 2 #6). All these lithologic units topographically flank the modern
Amagá formation and are considered potential detrital source areas for the Amagá Basin (Correa and Silva,
1999; Silva et al., 2008; Grosse, 1926; Restrepo et al., in review).
The depositional age of the Amagá Formation is well constrained. On the basis of palynologic assemblages
observed in floodplain deposits from the lowermost portions of the Lower Member, Van der Hammen (1958)
and Pons (1984), concluded a middle Oligocene age for the onset of deposition. The upper limit of
sedimentation is considered middle-late Miocene, as suggested by the palynologic assemblages reported
Silva and others (2008) reported three stages in the evolution of the Amagá Formation that are marked by
changes in the sedimentologic and stratigraphic characteristics of the sequence and by changes in the
compositionl mode of the sandstones. Such changes reflect major fluctuations in base level resulting from
significant geologic episodes since the middle Cenozoic. The initial stage was related to a pulse of uplift
recognized for the Central Cordillera at ~25 Ma, episodes (Restepo-moreno et al., 2009; Van der Hammen,
1961; Gomez et al., 2005) which triggered moderate subsidence and high rates of sediment supply into the
basin. This stage favored the development of aggradational braided rivers and widespread channel
amalgamation resulting in poor preservation of both, low energy facies and geomorphic elements (Silva et
al., 2008). A second stage of increased subsidence and enhanced accommodation space during the Late
Oligocene favored the developing of meandering rivers thus allowing the formation of extensive swamps
deposits where a number of coal beds formed (from 90 to 3 m thick). High preservation of geomorphic
elements and high diversity of sedimentary facies characterize this stage resulting in the most symmetric
stratigraphic cycles of the entire Amagá Formation. Stage two was attributed to the migration of the Pre-
Andean tholeitic magmatic arc from the Western Cordillera towards the Cauca depression that generated
extensional movements along the Amagá Basin. The final stage of evolution for the Amagá Basin was
related to the development of late Miocene tholeitic volcanism (~10-8 Ma). The extensive thrusting and
folding associated with this volcanism reduced subsidence rates and accommodation space leading to the
development of highly aggradational braided rivers. Little preservation of low energy facies, poor
preservation of the geomorphic elements and a complete obliteration of important swamp deposits (coal
beds) within the basin are reflected by the most asymmetric stratigraphic cycles of the whole formation
(Silva et al., 2008). This stages however, may be related to the changing nature of convergence of the PCB
since the Oligocene.
Recently produced zircon U-Pb ages and apatite fission-track thermochronology data from the Amagá
Formation and some neighboring igneous massifs (detrital and magmatic samples) in conjunction with
recent sedimentologic, stratigraphic and compositional characteristics of Oligocene-Miocene siliciclastic
successions exposed along the Cauca River depression (e.g., the Amagá Formation to the North and the
Cinta de Piedra, Mosquera, and Esmita formations to the south) were used to assess the morphotectonic
and paleogeographic history of the region, and to constraint the evolution of these basins in the
geodynamic milieu implied by the docking of the Panama-Chocó block (PCB) and the establishment of the
Western Cordillera and the Paleo-Cauca fluvial network (Restrepo-Moreno et al., in review). Contrasting
evolution between the northern and southern sediment-stratigraphic domains and a marked provincialism
(backed by U-Pb and AFT data) are taken to entail two juxtaposed and yet disparate morphotectonic and
paleogeographic histories defined by the point of collision between the PCB and the North Andean block
in South America (~ 4º N): The Interandean and continental Amagá Formation to the north, and the marine
-dominated sedimentary sequences to the south (i.e., Cinta de Piedra, Mosquera and Esmita formations).
Combia magmatism occurred under a transpresional regime associated with the accretion of oceanic
material of the Panama-Choco Block along traces of the Romeral fault system (Lopez et al., 2006)
With the final docking of the Serranía de Baudó and the Plio-Quaternary closure of panama isthmus ,
magmatism migrated towards the axis of the Central cordillera, currently affecting only the region below
6ºN (Sierra, 1994; Toussaint, 1999), where modern Ruiz Tolima volcanic complex is situated.
Regionally, the Western Cordillera is composed of Upper Cretaceous rocks, including massive basalts and
pillows of the Volcanic Formation (Barrero, 1979; Aspden, 1984; Kerr et al., 1997; Sinton et al., 1998),
gabbronorites of the Bolívar Ultramafic Complex geochemically similar to the Volcanic Fm. (Kerr et al.,
2004), and finally Albian–Maastrichtian turbidites of the Espinal and Cisneros formations (Barrero, 1979;
Etayo-Serna, 1985a) to the south of the country. To the northern part of the cordillera, in Antioquia,
equivalent rocks are known as Cañasgordas Group (Alvarez, 1970; Alvarez y Gonzalez, 1978), which
comprise a volcanic-sedimentary sequence informally divide into Barroso Formation (volcanic member)
(Fig. 2 # 3) and Penderisco Formation (turbidites and chemical and biogenic sediments) of upper creta-
ceous age.
Reecent data reported by INGEOMINAS (González, pers. com.) shows very similar ages for volcanic forma-
tions of Western Cordillera (Volcanic and barroso Formation) and Central Cordillera (Amaime Formation).
Ar-Ar results are mainly grouped about 84-89 Ma. Diabasic group to the south reports slightly younger
ages about 81 Ma. Plutonic rocks in the northern part of Western Cordillera yields Ar-Ar ages about 92 Ma
(Anserma Gabbro), 80 and 114 Ma (Mistrato Pluton), 80 Ma (Guayabillas Pluton). In the Central cordillera,
mafic intrusives yields 2 Ar-Ar ages of c. 85 and 89 Ma (Cordoba igneous Complex).
The western Cordillera form part of the Caribbean Large Igneous Province (e.g. Kerr et al., 1997). Ultrama-
fic to mafic rocks formed in response to Late Cretaceous, mantle plume-related volcanism in the eastern
Pacific (Kerr et al., 1997; Luzieux et al., 2006; Pindell, 1990, 1993) erupted above the Galapagos Hot Spot
(Kerr et al., 2004; Luzieux et al., 2006; Pindell and Kennan, 2009; Sinton et al., 1998) and then accreted
against northwestern South America in the Upper Cretaceous (Hughes and Pilatasig, 2002; Jaillard et al.,
2004; Spikings et al., 2001, 2010; Vallejo et al., 2009).
In the northern section of the Western Cordillera, sediments associated with Barroso formation make up
more than half of the outcrop. These sediments, the Penderisco Formation, consist of a sequence of
cherts, black micritic limestones and deposits with possible turbiditic characteristics (Alvarez & González,
1978).
Ar-Ar ages in volcanic rocks yields a plateau age of 91•7±2•7 Ma (Kerr. Et al., 1997), consistent with
palaeontological evidence from the intercalated sediments (Kerr. Et al., 1997). The lavas and intrusives of
the Western Cordillera are tholeiitic in character and geochemical evidence suggest an origin in plume-
derived oceanic plateau (Kerr. Et al., 1997).
The volcanism associated with the Colombian portion of the Caribbean oceanic plateau appears to be of
three distinct ages: two well-dated events (40Ar/39Ar; fossils from intercalated sediments), one of Late
Cenomanian– Turonian (88–92 Ma) and another of Late Campanian– Early Maastrichtian (72–78 Ma), plus
another eruptive episode older than 100 Ma (Kerr. Et al., 1997).
The rocks are phaneritic, alotriomorphic, medium-grained, often slightly to intensely oriented. They
comprise plagioclase, amphibole, pyroxene and sometimes quartz and opaques, and accessory minerals
are apatite and sphene. Both rock-types range from pyroxene-rich to amphibole-rich. Amphiboles
surround and sometimes completely replace the pyroxene, and various stages of replacement can be
observed, indicating late-stage hydration.
The tonalitic rocks have some characteristics similar to Low-SiO2 adakites (Martin et al., 2005) and primor-
dial mantle-normalized spidergrams are characterized by negative Nb-Ta and Ti anomalies, suggesting a
subduction related signature. Sr and Nd isotopic data are homogenous (87Sr/86Sr – 0.70366, Ndi – + 6.7)
and are compatible with melt generation from a mafic source. A new incremental heating 40Ar/39Ar date
indicates that cooling of the Batholith occurred around 92 Ma.
The geochemical characteristics and field relations are very similar to those described for the Aruba
Batholith (White et al., 1999), the Buga Batholith (Villagómez et al., 2008), and the Pujilí Batholith (Vallejo
et al., 2009), and therefore a similar tectonic setting is probable for all four units. The most likely tectonic
scenario for these rocks, is the west dipping subduction zone, that initiated along the eastern margin of
the Colombian Caribbean plateau, enabling the emplacement of mafic to intermediate magmas into
basaltic rocks of the CCOP. During the Maastrichtian these units were accreted onto the South American
margin, prior to the formation of a post-collisional continental arc at 65-55 Ma.
The Santa Fe Batholith has traditionally been mapped as part of the Cretaceous Sabanalarga Batholith
(see González and Londoño, 2001), which outcrops to the east of the Cauca-Almaguer Fault. This unit
intrudes the Cajamarca Complex, which is the makeup of the Central Cordillera basement, considered as
the Pre-Triassic continental Andean margin.
The separation of the Santa Fe Batholith into two separate units was first proposed by Nivia and Gómez
(2005), based on petrographical and tectonic evidence. K-Ar ages in biotite and hornblende of the Saba-
nalarga Batholith are 97 ± 10 Ma and 98 ± 3.5 Ma respectively. If both, the Santa Fe and Sabanalarga
Batoliths are considered as one unit, the accretion of the Colombian Caribbean Plateau onto the South
American plate margin would have had to have occurred before the Turonian.
The trip will take us from modern Medellín city to the historical colonial town of Santa Fe de Antioquia,
along the Cauca River, heading afterwards to the mountainous city of Manizales, where coffee and
volcanoes are part of the landscape.
General information
Figure 2 shows the main roads linking Medellin - Santa Fe de Antioquia – Bolombolo – La Pintada –
Manizales. The map includes field points of observation (yellow stars) on a geological base map, which in
turn shows the main lithological units referred in the text.
Santa Fe de Antioquia is a national historical monument given its colonial architecture. It possess 6
churches and houses of the XVI, XVII y XVIII centuries. The town is located at 550 m.a.s.l and a mean of
25Co. It is recommended wearing proper cloths for warm climate and keep enough liquid.
Pictures of the area, including panoramical views and rock characteristics are available at this link:
https://picasaweb.google.com/116714157401905796743/PanoramicalPicturesNearSantaFeDeAntioquia?feat=directlink
Itinerary
The field trip is intended to show an overview of the complex transition of the Central Cordillera into the
Western Cordillera through the RFS (Figs. 1, 2, 9 and 10). The first day we will cross the Cauca Valley in the
northern part of the area until reach rocks of the Western Cordillera represented by the Santa Fe batho-
lith Batolith (Fig. 2 #2). During the journey we will observe outcrops of the Amaga Formation and defor-
med rocks of the Arquía complex. The second day we will head to Ciudad Bolivar (Fig. 2) to see exposu-
res of Barroso and Combia Formations. The third day we will go to La Pintada (Fig. 2) and Rio Arquia (Est.
20) to observe mafic schist and garnetiferous amphibolites of the Arquía Complex. At the end of the
afternoon we will back to Medellin.
Day 1 (September 3)
The field trip begins in the Medellin city heading NW to the Santa Fe de Antioquia town. The first field
point is known as the Boquerón (Est. 1)). This point allows the observation of the Aburra Valley to the east
where Medellin is located. It is possible either observe the Cauca Valley to the North.
In this area we can observe Tr (?) Amphibolites of the Central Cordillera and medium grade schist belon-
ging to the Cajamarca Complex. Amphibolites are probably related to deformed gabbros and amphiboli-
tes located within the RFS although some authors considered it as allocthonous blocks obducted in the
lower Cretaceous (Toussaint and Restrepo, 1989).
Passing 5 kms in NW direction from Santa Fe de Antioquia, we are now fully located in the western
cordillera domain. In this point outcrop the lower Mesozoic Santa Fe Batholith Batolith (Est. 4,5 and 6).
Some pictures of landscapes are taken from this place (Fig. 11).
We spend the night in Santa Fe de Antioquia where there are plenty of nice places for diner and drinking.
Day 2 (September 4)
Most part of the day will be dedicated to the neighboring areas of Santa Fe de Antioquia within the RFS
area of influence. We will visit the Puente de Occidente, a bridge over the Cauca river (Est.7) (see link of
pictures - panoramical pictures). In this place outcrops L-tectonites Tr(?) gabbros and amphibolites (Fig.
12). These mafic rocks are continuous with Pueblito diorite further south (Fig. 2 #6). Rodriguez et al.
(2010) present evidence of intrusive contact with schist of Sabaletas (Fig. 13), implying a pre-mesozoic
age for at least some fragments of the Arquía Complex (see link pictures – structures in schist). Other
authors consider the contact as being regionally faulted of Sabaletas schist with Tr Pueblito diorite.
Hiking along the Barbudo creek is an option; it would depend of the weather. Along the creek it is possi-
ble observe structures associates with deformed Tr gabbros and amphibolites (see link pictures – Barbu-
do creek), deformed sediments and volcanics of Quebragrande formation (Fig. 14)(see link pictures –
structures in Quebradagrande). The Barbudo creek is the best route in the area to see structures associa-
ted with RFS. Includes discrete shear zones, associated folding, stretched boudins, etc. Some granitic sills
are observed intruding the shale sequence (see link pictures – Barbudo creek). Ultramafic rocks can be
seen few kms east of Sucre along a local road. They correspond to lense shape bodies parallel to regional
NNW structures. Finally we will ascend towards Llanadas village to the east. In this point outcrops schist
of Cajamarca Complex again. This is an excelent point to observe landscapes to the west and south-west
(see link pictures – panoramical pictures).
Fig 13. Mafic dike crosscutting rocks of Sabaletas schist (Arquia Complex).
Day 3. (September 5)
From Ciudad Bolivar we will head to the East to La Pintada. Passing la Pintada, We will visit the Guavita
creek where massive serpentinite with peridotite cores appears. One km from this point we will visit the
Rio Arquía w(Est. 20) here outcrops black and green intercalated schists intruded by andesitic and dacitic
Mio-Pliocene porphyritic rocks. These rocks normally host important deposits of gold and basic metals
actually being exploted in the Marmato mine district. Locally the schists presente faulted contact with
garnetiferous amphibolites. Finally, getting back to Medellin.
Fig 14. Discrete metrical shear zone developed in sediments of Quebradagrande Formation. Structure marks the regional
west verging thrusting over Triassic (?) L-tectonite gabbros (Sucre Amphibolite).
Fig 16. Faulted contact between Amaga Formation and Santafe batholith.
Álvarez, J. A., 1987. Geología del Complejo Ofiolítico de Pacora y secuencias relacionadas de arco de islas
(Complejo Quebradagrande), boletín geológico, Ingeominas, v. 35 (1), 81 P.
Aspden, J. A. and M. Litherland, 1992, The geology and Mesozoic collisional history of the Cordillera Real,
Ecuador, Tectonophysics, v. 205, p. 187-204.
Botero, G. and H. González, 1983, Algunas localidades fosilíferas cretáceas de la Cordillera Central, Antio-
quia y Caldas, Colombia, Geología Norandina, v. 7, p. 15-28.
Bürgl, H. y L. Radelli, 1962, Nuevas localidades fosilíferas en la Cordillera Central de Colombia: Geología
Colombiana, v. 3, p. 133-138.
Case, J.E., L. G. Duran, A. Lopez, and R. Moore, 1971, Tectonic investigations in western Colombia and
eastern Panama, Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 82 (100, p. 2685-2712.
Etayo-Serna, F. 1985, Documentación paleontológica del infracretacico de San Felix y Valle Alto, Cordille-
ra Central, En Etayo-Serna, F. and Laverde, F. (eds.), Proyecto Cretácico, Publicaciones Geológicas Especia-
les, Ingeominas, v.16, no 25, p. 1-7.
Gómez, A., M. Moreno, and A. Pardo, 1995, Edad y origen del “Complejo Metasedimentario Aranzazu-
Manizales” en los alrededores de Manizales (departamento de Caldas, Colombia), Geología Colombiana,
v. 19, p. 83-93.
González, H. 1980, Geología de las planchas 167 (Sonsón) y 187 (Salamina), Boletín Geológico, Ingeomi-
nas, v. 23 (1), p. 1-174.
González, H., Lemoigne, I. y Martínez, J. O., 1977. La flora de la Formación Valle Alto, Jurásico en la Cordi-
llera Central de Colombia: Boletín Ciencias de la Tierra, v. 2, p. 107-122.
Grosse, E., 1926. El Terciario carbonífero de Antioquia, en la parte occidental de la Cordillera Central de
Colombia entre el río Arma y Sacaojal, Berlín, Dietrich Reimer, 361 P.
Jaillard, E. G. Laubacher, P. Bengtson, A. V. Dhondt and L. G. Bulot, 1999, Stratigraphy and evolution of the
Cretaceous forearc Celica-Lancones basin of southwestern Ecuador, Journal of South American earth
sciences, v. 12, p. 51-68.
John, T., E. Scherer, V. Schenk, P. Herms, R. Halama, and D. Garbe-Schönberg (2010). Subducted
seamounts in an eclogite-facies ophiolite sequence: the Andean Raspas Complex, SW Ecuador, Contribu-
tions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 159(2), 265-284.
Kerr, A.C., Marriner, G. F., Tarney, J., Nivia A., Saunders, A. D., Thirlwall, M. F. And Sinton, C. W.. 1997. Creta-
ceous Basaltic Terranes in Western Colombia: Elemental, Chronologicaland Sr-Nd Isotopic Constraints on
Petrogenesis. Journal of Petrology. V38 No 6 p. 677.
Kroonenberg, S., J. G. M. Bakker and A. M. Van del Wiel, 1990, Late Cenozoic uplift and paleogeography of
the Colombian Andes: constraints on the development of high-Andean biota, Geolologie en Mijnbouw,
v. 69, p. 279-290.
Lozano, H., Pérez, H. y Mosquera, D. 1975. Prospección geoquímica en los Municipios de Salento, Quindio
y Cajamarca, Tolima, Ingeominas, 103 P.
McCourt, W. J., D. Mosquera, A. Nivia and A. Núñez, 1984, Mapa geológico preliminar, Plancha 243-
Armenia, Escala 1:100 000, Ingeominas, Bogotá.
Maya, M. and González, H. 1995. Unidades litodémicas en la Cordillera Central de Colombia. Boletín
Geológico, Ingeominas, v. 35 (2-3), p. 43-57.
Martin, H., Smithies, R. H., Rapp, R., Moyen, J.-F., Champion, D., 2005. An overview of adakite, tonalite-
trondhjemite-granodiorite (TTG), and sanukitoid: relationships and some implications for crustal evolu-
tion. Lithos 79, 1-24.
Meissner, R. O., E. R. Flueh, F. R. Stibane and F. Berg, 1976, Dynamics of the active plate boundary in
southwest Colombia according to recent geophysical measurements, Tectonophysics, v. 35, p. 115-136.
Moreno-Sánchez, Gómez-Cruz, A. de J. & Toro, L. M. 2008. Proveniencia del material clástico del Complejo
Quebradagrande y su relación con los complejos estructurales adyacentes. Boletín de ciencias de la
tierra, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, v.22 p.27–38.
Mosquera, D., 1978. Geología del cuadrángulo K8 Manizales (informe preliminar), Ingeominas, 63 p.
Unpublished.
Nivia, A., Marriner, G. F., Kerr, A. C. & Tarney. J. 2006. The Quebradagrande Complex: A Lower Cretaceous
ensialic marginal basin in the Central Cordillera of the Colombian Andes. Journal of South American
Earth Sciences, v. 21, p. 423-436.
Pardo, A., Moreno, M. Estratigrafia del occidente colombiano y su relacion con la evolucion de la provin-
cia ignea cretacea del Caribe colombiano.
Rodríguez, C. and R. Rojas, 1985, Estratigrafía y tectónica de la serie infracretácica en los alrededores de
San Félix, Cordillera Central de Colombia. In Etayo-Serna, F. and Laverde, F. (eds.), Proyecto Cretácico,
Publicaciones Geológicas Especiales, Ingeominas, v. 16/ XXI, p. 1-21.
Thouret, J. C., A. Murcia, R. Salinas and N. Vatín Pérignon, 1985, Cronoestratigrafía mediante dataciones
K-Ar y 14C de los volcanes compuestos del Complejo Ruiz-Tolima y aspectos volcano-estructurales del
Nevado del Ruiz (Cordillera Central, Colombia), VI Congreso Latinoamericano de Geología, Memorias, v. I,
p. 385-454, Bogotá.
Toussaint, J. F., 1996, Evolución geológica de Colombia durante el Cretácico, Universidad Nacional de
Colombia, Medellín, 277 p.
Vallejo, C., W. Winkler, R. A. Spikings, L. Luzieux, F. Heller, and F. o. Bussy (2009). Mode and timing of terra-
ne accretion in the forearc of the Andes in Ecuador, Geological Society of America Memoirs, 204.
Villagómez, D., Spikings, R., Seward, D., Magna, T., Winkler, W., Kammer, A. 2008. Thermotectonic history of
the Northern Andes. 7th International Symposium on Andean Geodynamics (ISAG 2008, Nice), Extended
Abstracts: 573-576
Villagómez, D., Spikings, R., Magna, T., Kammer, A., Winkler, W. & Beltrán, A., 2011. Geochronology,
geochemistry and tectonic evolution of the Western and Central Cordilleras of Colombia, Lithos, doi:
10.1016/j.lithos.2011.05.003.
Villamil, Tomas. 1999. Campanian–Miocene tectonostratigraphy, depocenter evolution and basin develo-
pment of Colombia and western Venezuela. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 153
(1999) 239–275.