PAYGo PERFORM Accounting Brief
PAYGo PERFORM Accounting Brief
October 2021
Acknowledgments
Acknowledgements
3. Outstanding receivables
The PAYGo PERFORM KPI pilot identified several different approaches undertaken by PAYGo
firms in key accounting treatments. Beside the impact on the PAYGo PERFORM KPIs, the
current variety of practices, including more and less prudent approaches, may expose PAYGo
firms to risks:
Investors: different accounting standards and practices may make the PAYGo industry
less attractive in the eyes of non-specialized investors due to the higher effort needed
to understand the Financial Statements, the KPIs and their accuracy and comparability
2
limitations. Investors may feel more comfortable in an environment that appears
transparent to them and where benchmarking is possible, e.g. the CGAP Microfinance
Consensus Guidelines of 2003 positively contributed to an investor friendly
environment for MFIs.
1 Accounting impact on PAYGo
PERFORM KPIs
Introduction
“
It’s hard to require a certain method. But
there needs to be awareness. As long as
the accounts are IFRS approved they aren’t
illegal, but different standards can change
the picture
A PAYGo Firm
1 Goals of the PAYGo
Accounting Brief
Introduction
Short
In the short-medium term, transparently disclosing the accounting term
policies used and considering them in the interpretation of the KPIs
would already be beneficial for points 2 and 3 above.
1 Sources
Introduction
• The unit of analysis in the PAYGo • The primary object of analysis are the
Accounting Brief is one PAYGo firm Financial Statements of the PAYGo firms
incorporated in its country of operating in each country, because this is
operation. This is referred to as a where PAYGo business operations are
PAYGo firm recorded
• It is recognized that some PAYGo • Accounting standards may differ across
firms are subsidiaries of international PAYGo firms in different countries
groups that own multiple PAYGo firms belonging to the same international
in multiple countries group
• However, the international group
Financial Statements (consolidated or
holding type, e.g. including the equity
and debt investments in the
subsidiaries) are not the primary
object of the PAYGo Accounting Brief
2 Revenue recognition
2
“ “
Revenue recognition
Yes Yes
Contract transfers Ownership is transferred
ownership to customer at the beginning
No No
Yes
Value of good is small or Value of good is small or Yes
contract is < 12 months contract is < 12 months
No Option
No Option
IFRS 16 IFRS 16
Operating lease Finance lease
IFRS 15
2 Different revenue recognition
in PAYGo firms
Revenue recognition
IFRS 16 IFRS 16
No IFRS IFRS 15
Finance lease Operating lease
PAYGo firms in the sample adopting the practice: majority some few
2 Different financial
statements of PAYGo firms 1
Revenue recognition
• A unit is sold to a customer on 1st Jan 2021 under a 2 years PAYGo contract for a total
value of USD 250;
• The cash price of the same unit is USD 150;
• The upfront deposit paid by the customer is USD 50;
• The total follow-on payments payable by the customer are USD 200;
• The follow-on payments from the customer are scheduled for USD 80 in 2021 and for
USD 120 in 2022.
• The collection rate from the customer in 2021 is 70%
2 Different financial
statements of PAYGo firms 2
Revenue recognition
Balance sheet
Assets Assets Assets Assets
Trade receivables 90 Trade receivables 90 Net lease receivables 70 Trade receivables 24
Gross receivables 130 Gross receivables 130
Loss reserve (40) Loss reserve (40) Loss reserve (20) Loss reserve (20)
Lease assets 60
Liabilities
Deferred fin. Income 50
Mock-up: selected items, data not real and for illustration purposes only
Variations within each IFRS category (order, other) presented in next sections.
2 Different product and finance
income in PAYGo firms 1
Revenue recognition
• Judgment used in estimating cash price, when unit is not sold cash (e.g. credit
losses factored in or not factored in Finance income)
• Different terms: the longer the term, the higher the finance income %;
• Different term concepts: contractual (IFRS 15) or effective (more prudential)
Opportunity: common criteria for comparability, based on benchmarks of products sold cash
2 Different product income
disclosure in PAYGo firms
Revenue recognition
PAYGo firms in the sample adopting the practice: majority some few
2 IFRS 15 and IFRS 16
comparison for PAYGo firms
Revenue recognition
Which IFRS is applicable depends on the product, the nature of the operation described in customer
contracts and on the accounting choice of the firm.
IFRS 15 and IFRS 16 Finance lease are similar in some of their mechanisms. However, the sale nature
of operations under IFRS 15 and the lease nature of operations under IFRS 16 entail significant
differences in some accounting areas and possible regulation applicability:
✓
IFRS 15
higher cost lower cost
less evenly spread
IFRS 16 Finance lease Intermediate cost
higher cost if
financial
✓ ✓
IFRS 16 Operating lease regulation is
more evenly spread lower cost
applicable
2 IFRS 15 and IFRS 16:
local authorities
Revenue recognition
Local authorities may have different incentives for PAYGo firms to adopt
different accounting standards:
• Tax authorities may favor IFRS 15, resulting in higher and more upfront
sales and revenues, resulting in higher VAT and profit taxes. For the same
reason, provisioning policies resulting in under-provisioning of the credit
risk may be favored, and more prudential provisioning may be questioned.
• On the other hand, regulators may favor IFRS 16, resulting in more
prudential revenue recognition, as well as strict provisioning policies, to
appreciate the performance of the firm, detect risks earlier than later, and
preserve the stability of the firm in the system.
2 IFRS 15 and IFRS 16:
revenues and cost
Revenue recognition
1 IFRS 16 finance lease presents several aspects coherent with the lease-to-own nature of the majority
of PAYGo operations. It is possible that some firms may evolve over time towards IFRS 16 finance
lease, being subject to financial regulation or not .
2 However, IFRS 15 always remains an option, when contracts to customers are clear on the outright
sale nature of the agreement (as opposed to lease-to-own), or even when the nature of the operation
is leasing, provided that the value of contracts is small.
3
Moreover, accounting standards are in constant evolution in PAYGo firms, e.g. one international
group may move from a combination of standards (e.g. IFRS 15, IFRS 16, no IFRS), to a higher
number of firms using IFRS 16; another international group may move from IFRS 16 to a
combination of standards.
4
Given that industry harmonization is unlikely be achieved in the medium term, it is paramount for
investors and interested parties to be aware of the financial reporting standards used, their
consequences on the KPIs and implications for comparability.
2 Revenue recognition impact on
PAYGo PERFORM KPIs
Revenue recognition
PAYGo PERFORM KPIs for Financial Performance use cashflow instead of revenue to avoid the effect of
different revenue recognition methods on the resulting KPI. Using cashflow instead of revenue is necessary
1 considering the accuracy expectations of stakeholders conducting financial analysis. To the extent that revenue
may converge in the long term towards harmonized recognition methods, it may be possible to move back
from cashflow to revenue.
On the other hand, the PAYGo PERFORM Company and Operational KPIs employ revenue as the effects of
2 differing revenue recognition approaches (see slide “Revenue recognition impact on PAYGo PERFORM KPIs”)
may not dramatically distort the Company and Operational analysis.
One area of potential distortion is the impact on several PAYGo PERFORM Financial Performance KPIs of the
different recognition of Cost of Goods Sold (CoGS) in IFRS 16 Operating lease compared to the other standards
3 (see slide “Cost recognition impact on PAYGo PERFORM KPIs”). The most feasible way to address this in the
short term seems to carefully consider the margins of non comparability with other firms when analyzing the
financial performance of firms adopting IFRS 16 Operating lease.
2 Revenue recognition impact on
PAYGo PERFORM KPIs
Revenue recognition
No IFRS (Cashflow)
IFRS 16 IFRS 16
No IFRS IFRS 15
Finance lease Operating lease
PAYGo firms in the sample adopting the practice: majority some few
3 Different receivables disclosure
in PAYGo firm
Outstanding receivables
More (✓) or less () disclosure. Firms in the sample adopting the practice: majority some few
3 Outstanding receivable impact
on PAYGo PERFORM KPIs
Outstanding receivables
IFRS 16 Operating
lease Suggested to calculate the Portfolio Quality
KPIs using the Outstanding receivables as per
PAYGo PERFORM definition (i.e. full trade
receivable), extracted from the operating
Outstanding receivables system, and not from the Financial Statements
if this differs from the PAYGo PERFORM
definition.
In this case, the impact of the different
IFRS 16 accounting approaches on the Outstanding
IFRS 15
Finance lease receivables is a possible difference between the
value used to calculate KPIs and the value in
No IFRS
the Financial Statements, that can be solved
with transparent reconciliation.
Lease
Trade receivable has significant financing component
receivable
Yes No
Option
Yes
Significant ↑ in credit risk Lifetime Expected Credit Loss
(ECL)
No
12 months ECL
4 Different credit loss provision
in PAYGo firms 1
Provisioning policy, Credit loss reserve
PAYGo firms in the sample adopting the practice: majority. Some few
4 Different credit loss provision
in PAYGo firms 2
Provisioning policy, Credit loss reserve
✓ Disclosed as contra-asset
Credit loss Receivables disclosed net of reserve only
reserve ✓ Movement in the reserve disclosed: opening balance,
write-off, addition, reversal, end balance
Receivables
• No IFRS or IFRS 15: Full receivables
basis for
provision • IFRS 16 financial leasing: net lease receivables
• IFRS 16 operational leasing: Invoices issued not paid yet
✓ Disclosed
Credit loss Part of cost of sale, or sales disclosed net of provision
provision
expense • Top position (e.g. under sales revenue)
• Mid position (e.g. before / in administrative expenses)
More (✓) or less () disclosure. Firms in the sample adopting the practice: majority some few
4 Credit loss provision impact
on PAYGo PERFORM KPIs
Provisioning policy, Credit loss reserve
The same credit risk may be The following Financial Performance KPIs
provisioned for at more or less are affected:
prudent levels depending on:
• Provision Expense Ratio (Cashflow)
IFRS 9 simplified or general
approach / no IFRS 9 • Unit Provision Cost
Opportunity to complement KPIs on provisions with risk coverage analysis to account for
variations in applying IFRS 9
5 Write-off and
Revaluation policy
5
“
Write-off and Revaluation policy
A PAYGo Firm
No IFRS IFRS 9
PAYGo firms in the sample adopting the practice: majority some few
5 Repossession in PAYGo firms
Write-off and Revaluation policy
• The later repossession takes place, the more likely it will be that the
repossessed value is lower than the outstanding receivable of the unit
repossessed.
• The difference, i.e. the unrecovered amount, is written-off in all the firms in the
sample.
Value Off-set by
Repossessed ↑ Inventory
IFRS 9 Outstanding receivable of
B5.5.55 unit repossessed
Unrecovered ↑ Write-off
5 Different write-off and
revaluation in PAYGo firms
Write-off and Revaluation policy
More (✓) or less () disclosure. Firms in the sample adopting the practice: majority some. few
5 Write-off and revaluation
impact on PAYGo PERFORM
Write-off and Revaluation policy
KPIs
Opportunity to analyze Write-Off Ration and Repossession Ratio (Value) jointly, to add
value to the individual KPI analysis.
6 Possible next steps
66 Possible next step 1
Policy next steps
Policy next steps
The following items may be object of future internal discussion within firms and / or
industry consultations:
1 Align the nature of business, contract to customers and regulatory status: adopt
the accounting standard associated to the type of transaction (sale; finance lease;
operating lease) that best describes the nature of PAYGo business, aligning the
contract language (is ownership transferred, and when), considering the fiscal
implications. In case of IFRS 16 adoption, firms shall assess the likelihood that this
may contribute to being identified as leasing companies, and the consequent risk
that leasing regulation requirements may not be commensurate to the capacity of
young firm. International grups of PAYGo firms may consider the opportunity of
gradual convergence to common group-level standards to the extent possible.
About
IFRS 9 is effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2018 with early
application permitted.
IFRS 9 specifies how an entity should classify and measure financial assets, financial
liabilities, and some contracts to buy or sell non-financial items.
Financial Assets
When an entity first recognises a financial asset, it classifies it based on the entity’s business
model for managing the asset and the asset’s contractual cash flow characteristics, as follows:
Amortised cost —a financial asset is measured at amortised cost if both of the following
conditions are met: the asset is held within a business model whose objective is to hold assets in
order to collect contractual cash flows; and the contractual terms of the financial asset give rise
on specified dates to cash flows that are solely payments of principal and interest on the
principal amount outstanding.
Fair value through other comprehensive income —financial assets are classified and measured
at fair value through other comprehensive income if they are held in a business model whose
objective is achieved by both collecting contractual cash flows and selling financial assets.
Fair value through profit or loss —any financial assets that are not held in one of the two
business models mentioned are measured at fair value through profit or loss.
When, and only when, an entity changes its business model for managing financial assets it
must reclassify all affected financial assets.
IFRS 15 (1/2)
AnnexesAnnexes
About
IFRS 15 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2018, with earlier
application permitted.
IFRS 15 establishes the principles that an entity applies when reporting information about the nature,
amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows from a contract with a customer. Applying IFRS
15, an entity recognises revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to the customer in an
amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those
goods or services.
To recognise revenue under IFRS 15, an entity applies the following five steps:
Identify the contract(s) with a customer.
Identify the performance obligations in the contract. Performance obligations are promises in a
contract to transfer to a customer goods or services that are distinct.
Determine the transaction price. The transaction price is the amount of consideration to which an
entity expects to be entitled in exchange for transferring promised goods or services to a
customer. If the consideration promised in a contract includes a variable amount, an entity must
estimate the amount of consideration to which it expects to be entitled in exchange for
transferring the promised goods or services to a customer.
Allocate the transaction price to each performance obligation on the basis of the relative stand-
alone selling prices of each distinct good or service promised in the contract.
About
The objective of IFRS 16 is to report information that (a) faithfully represents lease
transactions and (b) provides a basis for users of financial statements to assess the
amount, timing and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases. To meet that
objective, a lessee should recognise assets and liabilities arising from a lease.
Outstanding Receivables Value of the company’s gross outstanding receivables streams Gross Outstanding Receivables as Reported on
the Balance Sheet at a Fixed Point in Time
Collection Rate Ratio of all collected receivables payments over total receivables payments due Cash Receipts
for a period (does not include deposits) From Follow-on Payments During the Period
Scheduled Follow-on
Payments During the
Period
Receivables at Risk (RAR) Identifies risky proportion of receivables portfolio. Recommended to use both 1. Gross Outstanding Receivables
Consecutive Days Unpaid or Collection Rate below threshold to identify risky > [X] Consecutive Days Unpaid
portion of receivables portfolio.a Gross Outstanding Receivables
Key thresholds are > 30 days for consecutive days unpaid and
< 50% collection rate since activation, although using ranges of thresholds 2. Gross Outstanding Receivables
(e.g., CDU of 30, 90, 180 and CR < 70 and 50%) will likely provide valuable of Customers with Collection Rate < [Y]%
insights. Gross Outstanding Receivables
When difficult to use both methods, consecutive days unpaid is recommended
as a standalone measure.
a There can be meaningful overlap between the two different measures so care must be taken to avoid double counting.
PAYGo PERFORM KPIs 2/8
AnnexesAnnexes
Write-off Ratio The sum of the remaining payments of receivables streams Outstanding Receivables
that have been written-off in a given period divided by the sum for Written-off Contracts During the Period
of the remaining payments of the receivables streams for the Average Outstanding Receivables
entire portfolio During the Period
Repossession Ratio The sum of the remaining payments of receivables streams of Outstanding Receivables
repossessed units in a given period divided by the sum of the of Units Repossessed During the Period
remaining payments of the receivables streams for the entire Average Outstanding Receivables
portfolio During the Period
Contractual Credit Period Average nominal number of days between system acquisition and Contractual Repayment
expected final payment Term (Days) of Active Units
Effective Credit Period Effective (actual) length of time taken for an average customer to Effective Repayment
pay off their solar device Term (Days) of Repaid Units
Unit or Firm
Definition Calculation
Level Indicator
Total Cash Receipts The total cash receipts received from PAYGo customers – including The Sum of Customer Deposits and Follow-on
from PAYGo Customers customer deposits and follow-on payments Payments Received from All PAYGo Customers Over
a Period of Time
Cost of Goods Sold Ratioa Total cost of goods sold expressed as a proportion of cash receipts Cost of Goods Sold
received from customers Total Cash Receipts
from Customer
Sales and Maintenance Sum of all sales and maintenance costs expressed as a proportion Sales and Distribution Cost
Cost Ratioa of cash receipts received from customers + Servicing and Maintenance Cost
+ Other Variable and Semi-variable Costs
Cash Receipts from Customers
Provision Expense Ratioa The cost of credit provisions expressed as a percentage of Provisioning Expenses
cash receipts Cash Receipts
from Customers
Total Contribution Margin a The total profit based on variable costs for the PAYGo solar firm Cash Receipts from Customers
as a proportion of the total cash receipts received from – Total Variable and Semi-variable Costs
customers Cash Receipts from Customers
a Cash Receipts
PAYGo PERFORM KPIs 4/8
AnnexesAnnexes
Unit or Firm
Definition Calculation
Level Indicator
Financial Expense Ratioa The cost of financial expenses expressed as a percentage of cash Financial Expense
receipts Cash Receipts
from Customers
Fixed Operating Other fixed costs expressed as a percentage of cash receipts Other Fixed costs
Cost Ratioa Cash Receipts
from Customers
Fixed Cost Ratioa Sum of all fixed costs (Marketing, Sales, etc.) of a PAYGo solar firm Financial Expense + Other Fixed Costs
divided by total cash receipts received from customers Cash Receipts from Customers
Total EBT Margin a The total profit after all costs for the PAYGo solar firm as a Cash Receipts from Customers – Total Costs
proportion of the total cash receipts received from customers Cash Receipts from Customers
Unit Follow-on Payments Sum of contractual follow-on payments until system is permanently Receivables Generated During the Period
unlocked, net of customer deposits, per unit sold Number Of PAYGo Units Sold
During the Period
Unit Customer Deposits Total contractual PAYGo customer deposits per unit sold Customer Deposits
Number of PAYGo Units
Sold During the Period
Unit Cash Sales The total cash received from Cash sales per unit sold Cash Receipts
from Cash Customers During the Period
Number of Units
Sold Cash During the Period
a Cash Receipts
PAYGo PERFORM KPIs 5/8
AnnexesAnnexes
Unit or Firm
Definition Calculation
Level Indicator
Unit Device Cost The total Cost of Goods Sold during the period per unit sold Cost of Goods Sold
Number of Units Sold During the Period
Unit Sales and The total cost of installing the device at the customer site, Sales and Distribution Cost
Distribution Cost transportation cost (from warehouse to customer) per unit sold Number of Units Sold
During the Period
Unit Servicing and The total cost of servicing a customer (i.e., collection of payments, Servicing and Maintenance Cost
Maintenance Cost customer service) and providing maintenance of installed units Expressed as Monthly Equivalent
× Effective Credit Period Expressed in Months
Average Active Units
Unit Provision Cost The contractual follow-on payments that will not be recognized due Provisioning Expenses
to write offs on a per unit basis Average Active Units
PAYGo PERFORM KPIs 6/8
AnnexesAnnexes
Unit or Firm
Definition Calculation
Level Indicator
Unit Contribution Margin The average profit based on variable costs on a unit basis
for a particular product [ (Unit Customer Deposits + Unit Follow-on Payments)
×
Number of Units Sold PAYGo
Liquidity The liquidity of a company represented by cash and liquid assets Cash and Liquid Assets Convertible
convertible in the next 90 days to Cash in the Next 90 Days at End of Period
Total Costs Over the Next 90 Days
PAYGo PERFORM KPIs 7/8
AnnexesAnnexes
Sales Model Percentage of sales revenue (0 – 100%) by sales model: Sales Revenue Generated
PAYGo and Cash per Individual Sales Model During the Period
Total Sales Revenue During the Period
Sales Distribution Model Percentage of sales revenue (0 – 100%) by sales distribution Sales Revenue Generated by Individual Sales
model: B2B, B2C, and Other Distribution Model During the Period
Country Sales Percentage of sales revenue (0 – 100%) by country Sales Revenue During the Period by Individual Country
Total Net Sales Total number of units sold during the period, net of returned (Total Number of Units Sold During the Period)
and repossessed units – (Returned and Repossessed Units)
Repeat Sales Percentage of sales revenue (0-100%) from repeat customers Sales Revenue Generated by Units Sold
(current or former) to Existing or Former Customers During the Period
Total Sales Revenue Generated
by all Units Sold During the Period
Product Sales Percentage of sales revenue (0-100%) by product category. Sales Revenue by Product Category During the Period
Product categories are as per GOGLA standards Total Sales Revenue During the Period
PAYGo PERFORM KPIs 8/8
AnnexesAnnexes
Average Selling Price Average price of units sold, by sales model: PAYGo and Cash FOR THE CASH MODEL:
Cash Sales Revenue During the Period
Number of Cash Units Sold
During the Period
Sales per Distribution Percentage of sales revenue (0-100%) by distribution channel: Sales Revenue
Channel agents, wholesalers, shops, financial institutions, e-platforms, by Distribution Channel During the Period
governmental projects Total Sales Revenue During the Period
Sales Points Rate Fraction of sales points that have gone inactive over the previous Sales Points Inactive Over the Previous 90 Days
90 days, grouped by distribution channel – Agents (%), per Individual Distribution Channel
Wholesalers (%), Shops (%) and/or Other (%) Total Sales Points [T-1]
Net Promoter Score (NPS) Percentage of customers who rate their likelihood to recommend (% of Responses which are 9 and 10)
the service to friends or family as high, net of the percentage of – (% of Responses which are 0-6 Responses)
customers who rate as low.
The NPS should be calculated based upon customers’ responses This will Result in a Score Between 100 and –100.
to the question, ‘On a scale of 0 to 10, how likely are you to
recommend the product/service to a friend or family member,
where 0 is not at all likely, and 10 is extremely likely.’