BOUNDARY REPRESENTATION (BREP)

BOUNDARY REPRESENTATION (BREP)

BOUNDARY REPRESENTATION (BREP)
Boundary Representation Validity
Euler’s Equation
Boundary Representation Validity
Euler’s Equation
Boundary Representation Validity
Euler’s Equation
Boundary Representation Validity
Advantages

Disadvantage
COMPARISON
Constructive Solid Geometry (CSG)
BOOLEAN OPERATIONS IN CSG APPROACH
CSG Tree
Example of CSG Tree
Advantages

Disadvantage
 SWEEP
REPRESENTATION
Types of Geometric models - 2½ extrusions, axisymmetric,
composite, 3D objects
 Mass Property Calculations
• Mass property calculation was one of the first engineering applications to be implemented
in CAD/CAM systems.
• This is perhaps due to the strong dependence of these calculations on the geometry and
topology of objects. These calculations typically involve masses, centroids (centers of
gravity), and inertial properties (moments of inertia). They form the basis for the study and
analysis of both rigid and deformable body mechanics (statics and dynamics).
• For various objects, one can create their geometric models first, and then use them to
calculate their mass properties, which can later he used for analysis.
• Mass property calculations usually involve evaluating various integrals. Exact evaluation of
these integrals is only possible for simple shapes. For complex shapes, approximate
methods are usually used to evaluate these integrals.
• These methods have the important property that they monotonically converge to the
exact solution which is, of course, not known. Mass property algorithms that utilize these
methods are fully automatic and require no additional input except mass attributes, such
as the density of the model.
Parametric solid modeling:
• Parametric modeling is a modeling process with the ability to change the shape of model
geometry as soon as the dimension value is modified. Parametric modeling is implemented
through the design computer programming code such as a script to define the dimension
and the shape of the model.
• Parametric is a term used to describe a dimension’s ability to change the shape of model
geometry as soon as the dimension value is modified.
Featurebased is a term used to describe the various components of a model.
For example, a part can consists of various types of features such as holes, grooves, fillets,
and chamfers. A ‘feature’ is the basic unit of a parametric solid model.
• Parametric modeling uses the computer to design objects or systems that model
component attributes with real world behavior. Parametric models use featurebased, solid
and surface modeling design tools to manipulate the system attributes.
Parametric modeling allows the designer to define entire classes of shapes, not just specific
instances. Before the advent of parametric, editing the shape was not an easy task for
designers.
• For example, to modify a 3D solid, the designer had to change the length, the breadth and
the height. However, with parametric modeling, the designer need only alter one parameter;
the other two parameters get adjusted automatically. So, parametric models focus on the
steps in creating a shape and parameterize them. This benefits product design engineering
services providers a lot.

• Advantages
1. These are the benefits offered by 3D parametric modeling over traditional 2D
drawings:
2. Capability to produce flexible designs
3. 3D solid models offer a vast range of ways to view the model
4. Better product visualization, as you can begin with simple objects with
minimal details
5. Better integration with downstream applications and reduced engineering
cycle time
6. Existing design data can be reused to create new designs
7. Quick design turnaround, increasing efficiency.
Analytical solid modeling:
• ASM is closely related to finite element modeling. It is developed to aid designers in the
arduous task of modeling complex geometry commonly found in design applications.
• It can be viewed as more of a representation scheme for design than for manufacturing
purposes due to its formulation, which does not involve orientable surfaces as does brep
or CSG.
• ASM uses the parametric representation of an object in 3D space that is a mapping of a
cubical parametric domain into a solid described by the global coordinates.
• ASM is mainly for design applications and not suited for manufacturing. It does not
involve orientable surfaces as in Brep and CSG.
• ASM has now a wide range of applications such as mass property calculations, composite
material modeling, and computer animation.
• It is use in FEA due to the efficiency and flexibility of mesh generation algorithms that
operate on hyperpatches, which facilitates uniform transition or non uniform mesh and
division in hexahedral elements.
• The technique for creating spline or patch curve segments or surface patches is valid in
ASM.
ASM is appearing in design and analysis applications that require information
inside as well as on the boundary of a given object.
This is desirable, for example, in modeling and studying composite materials
and fracture mechanics problems.
• However, ASM is not adequate for manufacturing applications such as tool
path generation, because face surfaces of hyperpatches (parametric solid) are
not explicitly stored and are not orientable, i.e. normal to face surfaces
cannot indicate the interior or exterior of the object.

• Applications:
1) Mass property calculation
2) Composite material modeling
3) Computer Animation
4) FEM mesh generation with hyperpatch concepts.
E.g. PATRANG is based on ASM and has interface to various FEA packages.
 Introduction to Assembly Modeling
• Assembly modeling is considered an extension of part modeling.
• Assembly modeling raises two modeling issues that do not exist at the part
modeling level: hierarchy and mating.
• Individual parts and subassemblies must be assembled in the right hierarchy
(sequence) which is captured (stored) in an assembly tree for each assembly or
product.
Points to be considered before assembly,
• Identify the dependencies between the components of the assembly.
• Identify the dependencies between the features of each part.
• Analysis of the order the assembly of the parts.

Mating Conditions:
• Coincident
• Concentric
• Tangent
• Coplanar
• Parallel and perpendicular faces
• Symmetry
• Pattern etc.
Assembly Modeling
•Bottom-Up Assembly Approach

•Top-Down Assembly Approach

 Bottom-Up Assembly Approach
• In this approach, we create the individual parts independently, insert them into an
assembly and use the mating conditions to locate and orient them in the assembly
as required by the assembly design.
• The assembly modeling process itself begins with creating a blank assembly model
(file) using the assembly mode of a CAD system. We import (insert) the assembly
parts into this model, one at a time. The first part we insert is known as the base
part or the host, on top of which other parts are assembled. We use the proper
mating conditions to place and orient each inserted part correctly in the assembly
model.
• It is the preferred technique if the parts have already been constructed, as in the
case of offtheshelf parts. It also allows designers to focus on the individual parts. It
also makes it easier and simpler to maintain the relationships and regeneration
behavior of pails than in the topdown approach.
 Top Down Assembly Approach
• In the top-down assembly design approach, components are created inside the
Assembly Design workbench. Therefore, there is no need to create separate part files of
the components.
• This design approach is completely different from the bottom-up design approach. Here
you have to start the product file first and then, one by one, create all components.
• Note that even though the components are created inside the product file, they are
saved as individual part files and can be opened separately later.
• Adopting the top-down design approach gives the user the distinctive advantage of
using the geometry of one component to define the geometry of the other.
• Here the construction and assembly of the components takes place simultaneously. As a
result of this, the user can view the development of the product in real time.
• This design approach is highly preferred, while working on a conceptual design or a tool
design where the reference of previously created parts is required to develop a new
part.
 Design for Manufacturing [DFM]
• Design for Manufacturing (DFM) is the process of designing parts, components or products
for ease of manufacturing with an end goal of making a better product at a lower cost.
• This is done by simplifying, optimizing and refining the product design. The acronym DFMA
(Design for Manufacturing and Assembly) is sometimes used interchangeably with DFM.

• Five principles are examined during a DFM. They are:

1. Process
2. Design
3. Material
4. Environment
5. Compliance/Testing

• Properly executed DFM needs to include all the stakeholders — engineers, designers,
contract manufacturer, mold builder and material supplier.
 PRINCIPLES OF DFM
• Process: The manufacturing process chosen must be the correct
one for the part or product.
• Design: The actual drawing of the part or product has to
conform to good manufacturing principles for the manufacturing
process you’ve chosen.
• Material: it includes Mechanical, Thermal, electrical properties.
• Environment: Your part/product must be designed to withstand
the environment it will be subjected to.
• Compliance/Testing: All products must comply with safety and
quality standards.
Outcomes of An Effective DFM
1. Minimize the number of product parts.
2. Minimize variety of parts
3. Use standardized parts wherever possible
4. Use a modular design
5. Design multi-functional parts
6. Design multi-use products.
7. Select least costly material
8. Design for ease of fabrication or manufacture
9. Design your product to join without using screws, fasteners or adhesives.
10. Design your part to minimize handling, especially during production and
assembly.
 Design for Assembly [DFA]
• Design for assembly (DFA) is a process by which products are designed with
ease of assembly in mind. If a product contains fewer parts it will take less time
to assemble, thereby reducing assembly costs.
• Design for assembly (DFA) seeks to simplify the product so that the cost of
assembly is reduced with improved quality and reliability and a reduction in
production equipment and part inventory.
• In principle, recognizes the need to analyze the design of both the part and
the whole product for any assembly problems early in the process to cut costs
during the entire product cycle.
• Different methods of assembly are
1. Manual
2. Automated
3. Fixed or hard automation
4. Robotic Assembly
• The Hitachi assembly evaluation method: This method aims to facilitate design
Improvements by identifying weaknesses in the design at the earliest stage in the
process by using an assemble ability evaluation score and an assembly cost ratio. The
objective of the Hitachi assemblability evaluation method (AEM) is to
facilitate design improvements by identifying weaknesses in product design at
the earliest possible stage.
• The Lucas DFA method: Analysis is carried out in three sequential stages—
functional, feeding, and fitting. The Lucas method is based on a point scale that
gives a relative measure of the difficulty associated with assembly.
• The Boothroyd-Dewhurst DFA method: This method seeks to reduce the
number of parts by consideration of manual handling and manual insertion
times. The BoothroydDewhurst
method of assembly evaluation is based on two
principles: the application of criteria to each part to determine if it should be
separate from all other parts, and the estimation of the handling and assembly
costs for each part using the appropriate assembly process.
• A DFA method based on MTM standards
• An improved assembly methodology takes into consideration numerous factors,
such as the weight, size, and shape of components being assembled; frequency
Design for disassembly
• It is the process of designing products so that they can be easily, cost
effectively and rapidly taken apart at the end of the product's life so that
components can be reused and/or recycled.
• Total disassembly: The entire product is disassembled into its constituent
components. This may not be economically feasible due to the imposition of
external constraints, such as time, economic factors, and presence of hazardous
materials.
• Selective disassembly: Selective disassembly is the reversible dismantling of
complex products into less complex subassemblies or single parts. It involves
the systematic removal of desirable constituent parts from an assembly while
ensuring that there is no impairment of parts due to the process.
• Disassembly process planning involves, Product analysis, Assembly analysis,
Usage, mode, and effects analysis, Determination of dismantling strategy etc.
Design for disassembly guidelines
1) If possible, similar elements need to be combined in a group.
2) Material variability should be minimized to predict disassembly
procedures with a degree of certainty.
3) As far as possible, compatible materials should be used to facilitate
disassembly.
4) Any harmful materials, if functionally important, should be grouped
together into subassemblies for fast disposal.
5) Any valuable, reusable, and harmful parts need to be easily accessible.
This saves a lot of time and effort.
DESIGNING FOR SAFETY
• The principle of "Design for Safety" is to bring the consideration of the actual
potential hazards and risks to each project to the forefront of a designer's work.
Safe Design is the most effective risk control measure which is achieved by
eliminating the hazards at source.
• Its main objectives are,
1. Promote early involvement, effective cooperation and communication of all
stakeholders through the timely provision of relevant and necessary information.
2. Improve clarity on the demarcation of the roles and responsibilities of the
parties responsible for coordinating and providing relevant project data on risks
at all stages of a project.
3. Identifying the outputs of the "Design for Safety" application process and the
specific risk reduction measures.
Use Symmetrical parts in product
 References

1. Ibraim Zeid, ―Mastering CAD/CAM – Tata McGraw Hill

Publishing Co. 2000

2. Ibrahim Zeid and R. Sivasubramanian - CAD/CAM - Theory

and Practice Tata McGraw Hill Publishing Co. 2009
Mr. S. D. Patil, Automobile Department, Government College of
Engineering and Research Avasari 112