Lecture - 06 Fatigue I
Lecture - 06 Fatigue I
Dr Jing Fu (Clayton)
Dr Jen Nee Lim (Malaysia)
Introduction to Fatigue in Metals
• Loading produces stresses that are variable, repeated, alternating,
or fluctuating
• Maximum stresses well below yield strength (assumed to be safe)
• Failure occurs after many stress cycles
• Failure is by sudden ultimate fracture
• No visible warning in advance of failure
2
Case in history
3
How to identify
• “Beach Marks”. Very smooth region
because surfaces have been rubbing
against each other.
• Rough surface, final catastrophic
failure.
4
Stages of Fatigue Failure
• Stage I – Initiation of micro-crack due
to cyclic plastic deformation
• Stage II – Progresses to macro-crack
that repeatedly opens and closes,
creating bands called beach marks
• Stage III – Crack has propagated far
enough that remaining material is
insufficient to carry the load, and fails
by simple ultimate failure
5
Modelling fatigue – How to test
• Test specimens are subjected to repeated stress while counting
cycles to failure - most common test machine is R. R. Moore high-
speed rotating-beam machine
• Subjects specimen to pure bending with no transverse shear
• As specimen rotates, stress fluctuates between equal magnitudes of
tension and compression, known as completely reversed stress
cycling
• Specimen is carefully machined and polished
6
Fatigue testing
• txt
A commercial fatigue test machine Boeing 787 dreamliner in fatigue test, Feb 2010
7
Understanding the fatigue data
• Plotting Life N (number of cycles until fatigue failure) vs stress level
• This is a statistical process. Not all samples have the same initial
flaws.
• A linear model can be observed in the Log-Log plot.
8
Endurance limit Se
• If the load never exceeds a certain limit, it never fails: Endurance
Limit
• Occurs usually between 106-107 cycles. If it survived till here, it will
not fail.
9
Relationship of endurance limit and hardness
• A conservative estimation of endurance limit is 250 HB
10
S-N Diagram for Nonferrous Metals
• Nonferrous metals often do not have an endurance limit.
• Fatigue strength Sf is reported at a specific number of cycles
• References e.g. Mark’s Handbook. Perform testing
11
General cases beyond standard fatigue testing
• Testing (standard) machine based on bending only
• Axial loading has lower fatigue strength, usually 10% lower,
multiplying basic endurance limit Sn’ by 90%
• Torsional loading typically causes endurance limit Sn’ by 58%
• Torsional shear strength can be estimated by Sus=0.8Su
12
Estimation the fatigue
life of a general case
• Factors that affect endurance
limit. See Table 8.1
13
Factors (cont’d)
14
CL Load Factor
• Bending and Axial, negligible difference to the ideal case. CL=1.0
• Just as or less likely for load to concentrate on a flaw.
• Torsion, CL=0.58. Material weaker in shear.
15
CG Gradient Factor
• Axial Load – Uniformly distributed load across a cross-section. More
likely to stress random flaws in the material.
• Bending and Torsion, high load only at the outer surfaces. Less likely
to stress random flaws in the material.
• Larger cross-sections, larger probability for flaws.
• >50mm, need to find out (i.e. look up data if available or do
experiments)
16
CS Surface Factor
• More imperfections in surface, more
likely for flaw and therefore shorter
fatigue life or lower endurance limit.
17
CT Temperature Factor
• Materials weaker at higher temperatures. (> 840 F/450 C)
18
CR Reliability Factor
• S’n is a statistical mean.
• Assume Gaussian distribution for the sample with an 8%
standard deviation (typical for most materials).
• If you want to be 99.9% sure that it does not fail, need to be 3 x
the standard deviation below therefore 0.753.
• If less reliability is tolerable, can choose a higher value of CR
19
Summary
• Introduction of is fatigue and its characteristics.
• S-N diagram and endurance limit.
• Look up Sn’ (idealized), then find out all the factors that reduce it (Table
8.1).The actual fatigue life Sn= Sn’CLCGCSCTCR
• References:
o Juvinall RC, Marshek KM. Fundamentals of machine component design. Hoboken, NJ:
John Wiley & Sons; 2019
o Budynas RG, Nisbett JK, Shigley JE. Shigley's mechanical engineering design. Boston:
McGraw-Hill; 2008.