2023 Quantum Mechanics and Concepts
2023 Quantum Mechanics and Concepts
Chapter 1
1
2 Quantum Physics and Modern Applications
Harmonic Oscillators
Problem 1.13 Harmonic Oscillator: Energy Spectrum
by 2400:adc3:104:6900:24d6:29c:acb5:46fe on 11/16/23. Re-use and distribution is strictly not permitted, except for Open Access articles.
Solution
The time-dependent Schrodinger equation consists of the kinetic energy and
the potential energy on the RHS. It’s important that the potential energy
V is not time-dependent, i.e., V = V (x, t). Now, one writes for the solution
of the system a function which is separable in time and space.
ψ(x, t) = R(x)D(t)
Since variables t and x are now separated, both sides must be a constant,
one has
by 2400:adc3:104:6900:24d6:29c:acb5:46fe on 11/16/23. Re-use and distribution is strictly not permitted, except for Open Access articles.
1 ∂D(t) iEt
i = E → D(t) = Ce−
D(t) ∂t
and
1 ∂ 2 R(x) ∂ 2R(x)
−2 /2m + V R(x) = E → − 2
/2m + V R(x) = ER(x)
R(x) ∂x2 ∂x2
Quantum Physics and Modern Applications Downloaded from www.worldscientific.com
∂2
H = −2 /2m +V
∂x2
HR(x) = ER(x)
H is the operator aka Hamiltonian. R(x) is the spatial part of the eigen-
function. E is the eigenvalue.
(A) The expectation value of the energy varies with a beat-like pattern in
time consisting of two frequencies of ω1 = ε1 and ω2 = ε2 .
(B) The expectation value of energy is constant at 34 ε1 + 14 ε2 at all times.
(C) The expectation value of energy varies sinusoidally in time between ε1
and ε2 .
(D) The expectation value of energy varies sinusoidally with an amplitude
3 1
4 ε1 + 4 ε2 .
Note: Bra-Ket notations, e.g., |ψ are used in this problem, but a detailed
understanding of its formalism is not required at this stage. Further elabo-
ration of Dirac’s Bra-Ket formalism will be covered. At this stage, just take
note that Ket |ψ is an alternative to the function of ψ(x) when taken in
coordinate representation.
4 Quantum Physics and Modern Applications
Solution
√
Initial state: |ψ = 23 |φ1 + 12 |φ2 is not the eigenstate of the system. Like
by 2400:adc3:104:6900:24d6:29c:acb5:46fe on 11/16/23. Re-use and distribution is strictly not permitted, except for Open Access articles.
3 ε1 t 1 ε2 t
H|ψ = H|φ1 e−i + H|φ2 e−i
2 2
√
3 ε 1 t 1 ε2 t
= ε1 |φ1 e−i + ε2 |φ2 e−i
2 2
due to the fact that the system has |φ1 and |φ2 as the two lowest energy
eigenstates, with eigenvalues ε1 and ε2 . Now, let us write down the trans-
pose conjugate of |ψ,
√
3 ε1 t 1 ε2 t
ψ| = ε1 φ1 |ei + ε2 φ2 |ei
2 2
For a clearer picture, note is to be taken of the following correspondence:
|ψ → ψ(x)
ψ| → ψ ∗ (x)
Solution
(a) The expectation for an operator A in a quantum mechanical system
with wavefunction ψ(x, t) is given by
+∞
A = dxψ ∗ (x, t)Aψ(x, t)
−∞
∂ ∂ψ ∗ ∂ 2 ψ∗ ∂ψ ∗ ∂ψ ∗ ∂ψ
xψ = 2
xψ + ψ+ x
∂x ∂x ∂x ∂x ∂x ∂x
∂ ∂ψ ∗ ∂ 2 ψ ∗ ∂ψ ∗ ∂ψ ∂ψ ∗
xψ = xψ + ψ + x
∂x ∂x ∂x2 ∂x ∂x ∂x
One can now derive the following:
Quantum Physics and Modern Applications Downloaded from www.worldscientific.com
+∞ ∂ ∂ψ ∗ ∂ψ ∗ ∂ψ
p = dx xψ − xψ − ψ ψ + 2ψ ∗
∗
2i −∞ ∂x ∂x ∂x ∂x
As the wavefunction ψ is square-integrable and vanishes much more
rapidly than x tending to infinity, the integrand
∂ ∂ψ ∗ ∂ψ ∗ ∗
xψ − xψ − ψ ψ
∂x ∂x ∂x
is eliminated upon integration. One is left with
+∞
∂ψ
p = dx ψ ∗
−∞ i ∂x
And the operator expression
∂
p=
i ∂x
is deduced.
(b) The expectation of p must be real if quantum and classical physics are
to be consistent. Let’s examine the following:
+∞ ∗ +∞
∗ ∂ψ ∂ψ ∗
p = − dx ψ =− dx ψ
−∞ i ∂x −∞ i ∂x
The above leads to
+∞
∂ψ ∂ψ ∗
p − p∗ = dx ψ ∗ +ψ
−∞ i ∂x i ∂x
+∞
∂(ψ ∗ ψ)
p − p∗ = dx = [ψ ∗ ψ]+∞
−∞ = 0
i −∞ ∂x
The above follows from the square integrability of the wavefunctions,
i.e., they necessarily vanish at the infinite limits. The expectation of p
is therefore real regardless of the state of the system.
Quantum Mechanics and Concepts 7
∂P (x, t) ∂J(x, t)
+ =0
∂t ∂x
where P = ψ ∗ ψ is the probability density of the particle in space.
Quantum Physics and Modern Applications Downloaded from www.worldscientific.com
(b) Show that the energy term of eJ.A can be derived from
1 †
H= ψ (p + eA)2 ψ dx
2m
Solution
(a) In quantum physics, current is given by ψ † ∂H ∂H
∂p ψ, where ∂p has the
physical meaning of velocity where H is the Hamilton in classical
physics. To make sure the expression is Hermitian, we perform a sym-
metrization process as follows:
†
1 † ∂H ∂H
J= ψ ψ+ ψ ψ
2 ∂p ∂p
Now,
p2 ∂H p
H= → =
2m ∂p m
H=
2m
This leads to
1
H= ψ † (−2 ∇2 ψ) + [−i∇.(ψ † eAψ) − (−i∇ψ † ) · (eAψ)]
2m
− iψ † eA · ∇ψ + e2 ψ † A2 ψ dx
Quantum Physics and Modern Applications Downloaded from www.worldscientific.com
The first term (left) in the square bracket is the surface term that goes
to zero upon integration.
−i∇.(ψ † eA ψ) dx → 0
Dropping the kinetic energy term and considering only the interaction
energy term, one has
−ie
H= A · (ψ † ∇ψ − ψ∇ψ † ) dx = e J · A
2m
∂P (x, t) ∂J(x, t)
+ =0
∂t ∂x
∂P (x, t) ∂ψ † ∂ψ
= ψ + ψ†
∂t ∂t ∂t
Quantum Mechanics and Concepts 9
|ui ui | = 1
i
Quantum Physics and Modern Applications Downloaded from www.worldscientific.com
Note: Bra-Ket notations, e.g., |ψ are used in this problem, but a detailed
understanding of its formalism is not required at this stage. Further elabo-
ration of Dirac’s Bra-Ket formalism will be covered. At this stage, just take
note that Ket |ψ is an alternative to the function of ψ(x) when taken in
coordinate representation.
Solution
The state vector is written on the basis of discrete eigenkets |ui | as follows:
|ψ = ai |ui
With the use of the Kronecker delta function (the discrete version of the
Dirac delta), the above is reduced to one component as shown in the fol-
lowing:
As ui |ψ is a scalar, one moves the eigenket to the left, resulting in
by 2400:adc3:104:6900:24d6:29c:acb5:46fe on 11/16/23. Re-use and distribution is strictly not permitted, except for Open Access articles.
|ui ui | = 1
i
Quantum Physics and Modern Applications Downloaded from www.worldscientific.com
Solution
(a) Note that in coordinate representation, the momentum and position
operators are, respectively, px = − i∂
∂x , x = x. This leads to
i∂ i∂
ψ † (x)[px , x]ψ(x) dx = ψ † (x) − x+x ψ(x) dx
∂x ∂x
i∂ i∂
= ψ † −iψ − x ψ+x ψ dx
∂x ∂x
= ψ † (−i)ψ dx
[px , x] = −i = 0
Quantum Mechanics and Concepts 11
pr − rp = a
by 2400:adc3:104:6900:24d6:29c:acb5:46fe on 11/16/23. Re-use and distribution is strictly not permitted, except for Open Access articles.
→ pr = a + rp, rp = pr − a
= pa + ap = 2pa
[p2 , r] = 2p [p, r]
(c) To show [AB, C] = A[B, C] + [A, C]B, one examines the RHS and the
LHS separately:
1
= H ∗ [H, H ∗ ]
2
by 2400:adc3:104:6900:24d6:29c:acb5:46fe on 11/16/23. Re-use and distribution is strictly not permitted, except for Open Access articles.
1
=⇒ [H ∗ H, H ∗ ] = H ∗
2
Exercise: Derive a similar identity involving [A, BC] and prove the Jacobi
identity [A, [B, C]] + [B, [C, A]] + [C, [A, B]] = 0.
Solution
In the Schrodinger picture,
HS = H0 + VS
Table 1.
Operators Hamiltonian
Schrodinger Picture AS HS = H0 + VS
Heisenberg picture AH (t) = eiHS t AS e−iHS t HH = HS
Interaction picture AI (t) = eiH0 t A S e−iH0 t HI = H0 + VI (t)
Quantum Mechanics and Concepts 13
HH = eiHS t HS e−iHS t = HS
by 2400:adc3:104:6900:24d6:29c:acb5:46fe on 11/16/23. Re-use and distribution is strictly not permitted, except for Open Access articles.
H = HH = H S
Now, one can set out to find HI . In the Heisenberg picture, an operator is
Quantum Physics and Modern Applications Downloaded from www.worldscientific.com
Therefore,
Solution
Referring to this table
Operators Hamiltonian
Schrodinger Picture AS HS = H0 + VS
iHS t −iHS t
Heisenberg picture AH (t) = e AS e HH = HS
iH0 t −iH0 t
Interaction picture AI (t) = e AS e HI = H0 + VI (t)
14 Quantum Physics and Modern Applications
above table
Schrodinger picture
Heisenberg picture
Quantum Physics and Modern Applications Downloaded from www.worldscientific.com
ψH |AH (t)|ψH = ψS (t)|e-iHS t eiHS t AS e-iHS t eiHS t |ψS (t)
= ψS (t)|AS |ψS (t)
Interaction picture
ψI (t)|AI (t)|ψI (t) = ψS (t)|e-iH0 t eiH0 t AS e-iH0 t eiH0 t |ψS (t)
= ψS (t)|AS |ψS (t)
∂
p= = −i∂x
i ∂x
Table 2.
Form Expressions
∗
1. Integral form φ∗ (Oψ)dx = ψ∗ Oφdx = ψ(Oφ)∗ dx
∂
Note: Notations ∂x and ∂x
are interchangeable.
16 Quantum Physics and Modern Applications
Solution
Referring to Table 2, for simplicity, operator O is Hermitian if its expecta-
by 2400:adc3:104:6900:24d6:29c:acb5:46fe on 11/16/23. Re-use and distribution is strictly not permitted, except for Open Access articles.
tion satisfies
ψ † (Oψ) dx = (O ψ)† ψ dx
†
Note that ψ † Oψ is the conjugate of (Oψ) ψ, and symbol † is simply
Quantum Physics and Modern Applications Downloaded from www.worldscientific.com
conjugate for scalar ψ. Now, the following is performed for the momentum
operator:
†
ψ pψ = ψ † ∂x ψ dx
i
= −i ψ † dψ
= −iψψ † |∞
−∞ + i (dψ † )ψ
Now,
†
i (∂x ψ )ψdx = (−i∂x ψ)† ψdx
Therefore,
ψ † pψ = (pψ)† ψdx
of symmetrization as follows:
1
A= (ψ † (Oψ) + (Oψ)† ψ)dx
2
and A will be Hermitian.
Quantum Physics and Modern Applications Downloaded from www.worldscientific.com
Solution
An operator O that is Hermitian would satisfy
†
ψ † Oψ = (Oψ) ψ
†
The above implies that for a non-Hermitian O, the expression (Oψ) ψ
would be the complex conjugate of ψ † Oψ. As a result,
1
A= (ψ † Oψ + (Oψ)† ψ)
2
would be real as shown by
A= Re(ψ † Oψ)
In other words, A consists of only the real part of ψ † Oψ and is, therefore,
Hermitian.
P S + SP
Solution
To be sure that P S is Hermitian or self-adjoint, we need to show that
P S = (P S)† , i.e., product matrix P S is its own adjoint. Let’s take the
18 Quantum Physics and Modern Applications
adjoint of P S by writing
(P S)† = S † P †
by 2400:adc3:104:6900:24d6:29c:acb5:46fe on 11/16/23. Re-use and distribution is strictly not permitted, except for Open Access articles.
S † = S; P† = P
Therefore,
Quantum Physics and Modern Applications Downloaded from www.worldscientific.com
(P S)† = S † P † = SP
(P S)† = SP = P S
The above shows that P S is Hermitian only when [S, P ] = 0. The fact that
S, P are individually Hermitian is no promise that P S is Hermitian. Now,
in the event that [S, P ] = 0, or S doesn’t commute with P, P S would not
be Hermitian. However, by taking the conjugate of (P S + SP ),
(P S + SP )† = (P S)† + (SP )†
= (SP + P S)
Therefore, (P S + SP ) is Hermitian as
(P S + SP )† = (P S + SP )
P ψ(x) = ψ(−x)
Note: The Bra-Ket formalism will be covered in greater detail from Prob-
lem 1.18 onwards. Part (e) can be read together with the Bra-Ket problems
later if readers so prefer.
Solution
(a) Definition of Hermiticity:
+∞ +∞
ψ ∗ (x)Aφ(x)dx = (Aψ(x))∗ φ(x)dx
−∞ −∞
Let y = −x
+∞ −∞ +∞
∗ ∗
ψ (x)P φ(x)dx = −ψ (−y)P φ(y)dy = ψ ∗ (−y)φ(y)dy
−∞ +∞ −∞
(b) To find eigenvalues, let φ1 (x) be the eigenvalue of P and note that
Now,
= φ1 (x) (B)
For A = −1,
Let y = −x
−∞ +∞
I= φ∗e (−y)φo (−y)(−dy) = φ∗e (y)(−φo (y))dy
∞ −∞
y is a dummy variable,
+∞
I =− φ∗e (x)φo (x)dx = −I → I = 0
−∞
Quantum Mechanics and Concepts 21
= P † φe |P φo
As a result,
Harmonic Oscillators
Problem 1.13 Harmonic Oscillator: Energy spectrum
(a) A simple harmonic oscillator energy is given by
p2 1
H= + mω 2 x2
2m 2
Show that this energy system can be constructed with a pair of
operators a− , a+ which are Hermitian conjugate to one another, i.e.,
(a− )† = a+ .
(b) Show that [a− , a+ ] = 1 and that the Hamiltonian can be represented
by these operators as
1
HSHO = ω a+ a− +
2
Solution
(a) One can write
p2 1 mω ip mω ip
ET = + mω 2 x2 = ω x− √ x+ √
2m 2 2 2mω 2 2mω
HT = ω x− √ x+ √
2 2mω 2 2mω
p2 1 iω
= + mω 2 x2 − (px − xp)
2m 2 2
Therefore, ET =⇒ HT
Quantum Physics and Modern Applications Downloaded from www.worldscientific.com
1
HT = HSHO − ω
2
where HSHO is the quantum version of the SHO energy system. By
inspection of
mω ip mω ip
HT = x− √ x+ √
2 2mω 2 2mω
one can now introduce a pair of operators to represent the energy sys-
tem as follows:
mω ip mω ip
a+ = x− √ , a− = x+ √
2 2mω 2 2mω
mω † ip† mω ip
(a+ )† = x +√ = x+ √ = a−
2 2mω 2 2mω
The above shows that a− |En is also an eigenstate of HSHO with energy
lower than En by ω. This process can go on until the lowest energy
state |E0 is reached. The lowest energy state does not have to be zero.
Since there is no more state below E0 , further lowering it is formally
described by
a− |E0 = 0
1
Recalling that HSHO = ω a+ a− + 2 ,
1
HSHO |E0 = ω|E0
2
The ground state energy is E0 = 12 ω. Let us now perform HSHO a+ |En .
Making use of [HSHO , a+ ] = −ωa+ , one has
The above shows that a+ |En is also an eigenstate of HSHO with energy
higher than En by ω. Applying this to ground state E0 ,
(a) Assuming that |ϕn and |ϕn−1 are both normalized, show that kn =
√
n.
(b) Evaluate the lowering operation (a− )n |ϕn where |ϕn is the normalized
Quantum Physics and Modern Applications Downloaded from www.worldscientific.com
Solution
(a) Let a− |ϕn = kn |ϕn−1 , and thus
1
|ϕn−1 = a− |ϕn
kn
Take the transpose conjugate of the above and one has
1 1
ϕn−1 | = ∗
ϕn |(a− )† = ∗ ϕn |a+
kn kn
The above leads to
1 1
ϕn−1 |ϕn−1 = 2
ϕn |a+ a− |ϕn =⇒ 1 = 2 ϕn |a+ a− |ϕn (A)
kn kn
Now, we make use of the identity that [a− , a+ ] = 1, which quickly leads
to a+ a− = a− a+ − 1. The Hamiltonian of an SHO system is
1
H = ω a− a+ −
2
which once again leads quickly to
H 1 H 1
a− a+ = + , a+ a− = −
ω 2 ω 2
1
Substitute a+ a− = H
ω − 2 into (A), and one has
1 1 1
1= ϕn |H|ϕn − ω
kn2 ω 2
Quantum Mechanics and Concepts 25
1
Since ϕn |H|ϕn = En = n + 2 ω, one has
1 1 1 1 1 √
by 2400:adc3:104:6900:24d6:29c:acb5:46fe on 11/16/23. Re-use and distribution is strictly not permitted, except for Open Access articles.
1= n+ ω − ω = n =⇒ kn = n
kn2 ω 2 2 kn2
Solution
The raising and lowering operators have been defined as follows:
mω ip mω ipx
a+ = x− √ , a− = x+ √
2 2mω 2 2mω
26 Quantum Physics and Modern Applications
√
2ipx 2mω
a− − a+ = √ , a− + a+ = x
mω
mω
=⇒ px = −i (a− − a+ ), x= (a− + a+ )
2 2mω
Quantum Physics and Modern Applications Downloaded from www.worldscientific.com
Solution
(a) Consider the matrix component for the Hamiltonian:
by 2400:adc3:104:6900:24d6:29c:acb5:46fe on 11/16/23. Re-use and distribution is strictly not permitted, except for Open Access articles.
1
= j− ωϕi−1 |ϕj−1
2
1
= j− ωδij
2
Making use of
⎡ ⎤
0 1 √0 0
⎢
⎢1 0 2 ⎥
[x]ij = [x]ij = √ √0 ⎥
2mω ⎣0 2 √0 3⎦
0 0 3 0
one has
⎡ ⎤ ⎡ ⎤
0 1 √0 0 0 1 √0 0
⎢
⎢1 0 ⎥
2 √0 ⎥ ⎢1 ⎢ 2 √0 ⎥
[x2 ]ij = √ · √0 ⎥
2mω ⎣0 2 √0 3⎦ ⎣0 2 √0 3⎦
0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0
⎡ √ ⎤
1 0 2 √0
⎢⎢√0 3 0 6⎥
⎥
= ⎣
2mω 2 √0 5 0 ⎦
0 6 0 7
28 Quantum Physics and Modern Applications
1 0 2 √0
1 ω ⎢ 0 3 0 6⎥
mω 2 [x2 ]ij = ⎢√ ⎥
2 4 ⎣ 2 √0 5 0 ⎦
0 6 0 7
Note that the Hamiltonian is a diagonal matrix, i.e., all the off-diagonal
components are zeros, so it is a constant of motion. However, this is not
the case for the potential energy 12 mω 2 x2 — therefore, its expectation value
varies with time t. This is consistent with the physics of a classical harmonic
oscillator in which both the kinetic and the potential energies oscillate, while
the total energy is a constant.
It’s also worth noting that for any given energy eigenstate, the expec-
tation value of the potential energy is 1/2 that of the total energy. Once
again, this is consistent with the classical harmonic oscillator.
Solution
Use is made of
⎡ ⎤
0 −1 0
√ 0
mω ⎢
⎢1 √0 − 2 0 ⎥
⎥
[px ]ij = i √
2 ⎣0 2 √0 − 3⎦
0 0 3 0
Recall that
[px ]ij = i √
2 ⎣0 2 − 3⎦
√
0 0 3 0
2 1
|ψ = |ϕ0 + |ϕ1
3 3
where |ϕ0 and |ϕ1 are, respectively, the ground state (n = 0) and the first
excited state (n = 1). In other words, the SHO particle has twice the prob-
ability of being in the ground state compared to being in the first excited
state. Evaluate the product of the uncertainty in position and momentum,
i.e., (Δx)(Δpx ), and show that the product is in accordance with Heisen-
berg’s uncertainty principle.
Note: Δx = x2 − x2 and similarly for Δpx .
Solution
The following are listed down for references:
⎡ √ ⎤
√0 1 √0 0
⎢ ⎢ 1 √0 2 √0 ⎥
⎥,
[x]ij =
2mω ⎣ 0 2 √0 3⎦
0 0 3 0
⎡ √ ⎤
1 0 2 0
⎢⎢√0 3 0 √0 ⎥⎥
[x2 ]ij = ⎣
2mω 2 √0 5 6⎦
0 6 0 7
30 Quantum Physics and Modern Applications
⎡ ⎤
0 −1 0
√ 0
mω ⎢
⎢1 √0 − 2 0 ⎥⎥,
[px ]ij = i √
⎣ − 3⎦
by 2400:adc3:104:6900:24d6:29c:acb5:46fe on 11/16/23. Re-use and distribution is strictly not permitted, except for Open Access articles.
2 0 2 √0
0 0 3 0
⎡ √ ⎤
1 0 − 2 0
√
mω ⎢ 0
⎢ √ 3 0 − 6⎥ ⎥
[p2x ]ij =
2 ⎣− 2 0
√ 5 0 ⎦
0 − 6 0 3
Quantum Physics and Modern Applications Downloaded from www.worldscientific.com
2 1 2 1
x = ϕ0 | + √ ϕ1 | x |ϕ0 + √ |ϕ1
3 3 3 3
√ √
2 2 2 1
= ϕ0 |x|ϕ0 + ϕ0 |x|ϕ1 + ϕ1 |x|ϕ0 + ϕ1 |x|ϕ1
3 3 3 3
√ √
2 2 2 1
= [x]11 + [x]12 + [x]21 + [x]22
3 3 3 3
⎡ √ ⎤
√0 1 √0 0
⎢ 1 ⎥
Referring to [x]ij = ⎢ √0 2 √0 ⎥
2mω ⎣ 0 2 √0 3⎦
0 0 3 0
√
2 2
x =
3 2mω
Likewise,
√ √
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 5
x = [x ]11 + [x ]12 + [x ]21 + [x2 ]22 =
3 3 3 3 6mω
Therefore,
√ 12
7
Δx = x2 − x2 =
3 2mω
Quantum Mechanics and Concepts 31
2 2 2 1
px = [px ]11 + [px ]12 + [px ]21 + [px ]22 = 0
3 3 3 3
√ √
2 2 2 2 2 1 2 5mω
p2 = [p2x ]11 + [p ]12 + [p ]21 + [p ]22 =
3 3 x 3 x 3 x 6
1
5 mω 2
Δpx =
3 2
Quantum Physics and Modern Applications Downloaded from www.worldscientific.com
√ 12 12
7 5 mω
(Δx)(Δpx ) =
3 2mω 3 2
= 1.14 >
2 2
Note: Superscript v denotes a general vector space. The operator can take
on the matrix Am or the function Af forms in their respective spaces.
32 Quantum Physics and Modern Applications
Solution
We need to first set up an equivalent relation as follows:
by 2400:adc3:104:6900:24d6:29c:acb5:46fe on 11/16/23. Re-use and distribution is strictly not permitted, except for Open Access articles.
+∞
φ|ψ = φ∗ (x)ψ(x)dx (A)
−∞
−∞
φ|ψ = ψ|φ∗
+∞
With this, can we now set out to prove φ|Av |ψ = −∞ φ∗ (x)Af ψ(x)dx?
Not yet. We still need the following definitions in Bra-Ket, i.e.,
Av |ψ = |ψ = |Av ψ
φ|A |ψ =
v
−∞
+∞
(1) φ|ψ = φ∗ (x)ψ(x)dx which implies x|ψ = ψ(x) via the
−∞
completeness relation
(2) Av |ψ = |ψ = |Av ψ which implies
φ|Av |ψ = φ|Av ψ = φ|ψ
(3) x|Av |ψ = Af ψ(x) which leads to ψ (x) = Af ψ(x)
P v |p = p|p
Qv |x = x|x
Av |ψ = |ψ = |Av ψ
φ|Av |ψ = φ|Av ψ = φ|ψ
x|P |x =
v
x|P v |pp|x dp
Note: Superscript v denotes a general vector space, it can take on the matrix
P m or the function P f forms in their respective spaces.
Solution
(a) Letting P v act on |p, one has
x|P v |x = x|P v |pp|x dp = px|pp|x dp
1
x|p = √ eikx
2π
Finally,
P v |p = p|p
As p|ψ = ψ(p),
P f ψ(p) = pψ(p)
Solution
Method A
With the expansion theorem, one can write in terms of position vector.
Note that the position eigenvalues exist in a continuous spectrum.
+∞
|ψ = Ax |xdx
−∞
x|Qν |ψ = x|Qv | Ax |x dx
36 Quantum Physics and Modern Applications
= x|Ax x |x dx
by 2400:adc3:104:6900:24d6:29c:acb5:46fe on 11/16/23. Re-use and distribution is strictly not permitted, except for Open Access articles.
Note that
+∞ +∞
|ψ = Ax |xdx → x |ψ = Ax δ(x − x )dx = Ax
−∞ −∞
This leads to
Ax = ψ(x) = x|ψ
Now, as
Qf x|ψ = xx|ψ
x|Qν |ψ = Qf x|ψ
Method B
With the completeness relation (continuous identity), it can be shown that
x|Q |ψ = x|Qν |x1 x1 |ψdx1
ν
Quantum Mechanics and Concepts 37
x|Q |ψ = x|x1 x1 ψ(x1 )dx1 = δ(x − x1 )x1 ψ(x1 )dx1
ν
Now, as
Qf x|ψ = xx|ψ
One has
Solution
Let’s write down the commutative relation as follows:
We will now proceed with the completeness relation, using the position
eigenvectors |x as basis set
x|[Qv , P v ]|x = x|Qv |x x |P ν |x − x|P ν |x x |Qv |x dx
Note that x|Qv |x = x δ(x − x ). It thus follows that
x|[Q , P ]|x = x δ(x − x )x |P ν |x − x δ(x − x )x|P ν |x dx
v v
38 Quantum Physics and Modern Applications
Finally,
= (x − x )x|P ν |x
+∞ ∗
−∞
φ (x)Af ψ(x)dx and x|Av |ψ = Af ψ(x). Discussion will now be
shifted to the explicit representation of the operators in the function space.
We will focus on the momentum and the position operators
P f and Qf
P f = −i∂x
∂
Note: Notations ∂x and ∂x are interchangeable.
Solution
Since P f x|ψ = x|P v |ψ, we will begin with
x|P v |ψ = x|pp|P v |p p |ψdpdp
2π
ψ(k)
Note that in the above, use has been made of ψ(p) = √ . Note also that
x|P v |ψ = P f x|ψ = P f ψ(x). Therefore,
∂
P f = −i∂x = −i
∂x
P f and Qf
Qf = i∂k
∂
Note: Notations ∂k and ∂k are interchangeable.
Solution
Since Qf p|ψ = p|Qv |ψ, we will begin with
p|Q |ψ = p|xx|Qv |x x |ψdxdx
v
40 Quantum Physics and Modern Applications
It follows that
1
p|Q |ψ =
v
√ e−ik·x x δ(x − x )ψ(x )dxdx
2π
Quantum Physics and Modern Applications Downloaded from www.worldscientific.com
1
= i∂k √ e−ik·x ψ(x)dx
2π
By Fourier transform,
1 ψ(k)
i∂k √ e−ik·x ψ(x)dx = i∂k √
2π
ψ(k)
Note that in the above, use has been made of ψ(p) = √ . Note also that
p|Qv |ψ = Qf p|ψ = Qf ψ(p). Therefore,
∂
Qf = i∂k = i
∂k
On the other hand, in the derivation of Qf = i∂k , use is made of the Fourier
transform,
1
ψ(k) = √ e−ik·x ψ(x)dx
2π
Quantum Mechanics and Concepts 41
Show that the general form of φ3 (x) = x |k = ceik·x is derived such that
1
x |k = 3 eik·x
(2π) 2
Note: φ(x ) = φ3 (x) = φ(x)φ(y)φ(z) and δ(x ) = δ 3 (x) = δ(x)δ(y)δ(z).
Note: x |k = xkx y|ky z|kz and k|x = x|k∗ .
Quantum Physics and Modern Applications Downloaded from www.worldscientific.com
Note: Bold is used to make explicit statements about the vectorial nature
of the physical quantities involved.
Solution
Method A
Use is made of two common Identities,
3
1
δ(w ) = eiw ·x d3 x (A)
2π
In the above, use had been made of the closure relation. Comparing C
with D, one could thus deduce that c = 1 3 . Therefore,
(2π) 2
by 2400:adc3:104:6900:24d6:29c:acb5:46fe on 11/16/23. Re-use and distribution is strictly not permitted, except for Open Access articles.
1
φ3 (x) = x |k = 3 eik·x
(2π) 2
Method B
With experience, one alternatively begins with x |p = ceik·x and deduces
Quantum Physics and Modern Applications Downloaded from www.worldscientific.com
that
δ(p − p ) = p |x x |pd x = cc∗ ei(k −k )·x d3 x
3
This leads to
1 i x
δ(p − p ) = cc∗ (2π)3 3 e (p−p )·x 3
d
(2π)3 3
δ(p − p ) = cc∗ (2π)3 δ(p − p )
1
Therefore, c = 3 .
(2π) 2