Teaching Social Studies in Elementarey Grades
Teaching Social Studies in Elementarey Grades
As societies around the world struggle to keep pace with the progress of
technology and globalization, increasing individualization and diversity,
expanding economic and cultural uniformity, degradation of ecosystem
services, and greater vulnerability and exposure to natural and technological
hazards (UNESCO, 2017)
The National Council for Social Studies (NCSS) defines social studies as
“the integrated study of the social sciences and humanities to promote civic
competence. It provides coordinated, systematic study drawing upon such
disciplines, as well as appropriate content from other disciplines outside
social studies. The primary purpose of social studies is to help young people
make informed and reasoned decisions for the public good as citizens of a
culturally diverse, democratic society in an interdependent world.
According to Arthur Dunn, the purpose of Social Studies is to examining
social science topics which include civic competence, history, governance,
society, and culture, among other things.
The lessons and topics from Grade 1 to 12 are anchored in the seven themes
that include:
1. People, Environment and Society
2. Time, Continuity, Change
3. Culture, Responsibility, and Nationhood
4. Rights, Responsibilities, and Citizenship
5. Power, Authority, and Governance
6. Production, Distribution and Consumption
7. Regional and Global Connections
Conceptualizing Social Studies: A Brief History of Social Studies in School
Curricula
It is essential to examine as early as now how social studies as a subject
evolved. Subsequent paragraphs were heavily borrowed from the paper
written by David Warren Saxe title “Framing a Theory for Social Studies
Foundations” published in 1992. He explicitly stated this when he said that,
‘I argue that practitioners and theorists are prevented from articulating viable
perceptions of social studies purpose, theory, and practice because they lack
basic understanding of the original historical underpinnings of social studies”
This “Scarcity of theoretical” foundations can be rooted in the myths (as used
by Saxe) on the origin of social studies which widely spread among
educators and practitioners. He clearly pointed this out when he said that
“where teachers, administrators, and even social studies theorists continued
the litany and rituals of the field, there was little understanding of its original
purpose and even less understanding of a continuing dialogue for examining
collective aims.”
Myths on the Origin of Social Studies
1. Continuous Spontaneous Existence Theory – social studies exists without
any antecedents, it hold the idea that social studies past is not relevant
2. Big Bang Theory of 1916 – centered on the idea that social studies
suddenly appeared in the year 1916, thanks to the committee on the social
studies under the sponsorship on the Nation Education Association.
3. History Foundation Theory – is an extension of the big bang theory. Here,
conventional wisdom holds that history was the seedbed or promulgator of
social studies.
Social Studies as an Integrated Curriculum
As defined by Shoemaker (1989), is an education that is organized in such
a way that it cuts across subject-matter lines, bringing together various
aspects of the curriculum into meaningful association to focus upon broad
areas of study. Which includes integrated experiences, social integration,
knowledge integration and integration as a curricular model.
In integrated experiences, the learners take an active role in the educational
process by linking experiences with the information shared by the teachers.
Interdisciplinary curriculum, on the other hand, is a curricular model that uses
multiple disciplines or learning areas in examining a given theme, problem,
topic, or issue. As Lintner clarified “it is purposely subject-centered and
usually structured around a single objective (lesson plan) and developed and
delivered by a single teacher in his/her classroom”
The lessons and topics from Grade 1 to 12 are anchored in the seven themes
that include:
1. People, Environment and Society – Human interaction with his
environment is one of fundamental concepts in social studies. This is how
human interacts not only with his environment but also to a bigger society.
2. Time, Continuity, Change – Essential in the understanding of cultural and
national identity is the evolution and development of a given society. Central
in this study is the concept of time that serves as the contextual basis and
foundation in the analysis of social dynamics.
3. Culture, Responsibility, and Nationhood – Identity is anchored on culture
which pertains to the complex whole that includes belief system, values,
tradition, language, and arts of a group of people in a given society.
4. Rights, Responsibilities, and Citizenship – civic competence is grounded
on how citizens understand and value their role as members of society and
how they acknowledge their rights and roles and responsibilities as citizens.
5. Power, Authority, and Governance – is the understanding the concept of
the use of power in advocating the common good and the importance of
democratic processes in realizing good governance.
6. Production, Distribution and Consumption – provides learning experiences
that allows students understand economic concepts such as choice,
opportunity costs, expenditure, inflation, deficit, and sound economic
decision.
7. Regional and Global Connections – The Philippines is a member of a
bigger community called global village. This theme affords learners to
appreciate how the country influences the rest of the world and how it was
influenced in return.
Constructivist Theory in Teaching Social Studies
Basic Tenets of Constructivism
1. Knowledge is not passively accumulated but rather is the result of active
cognizing by the individual
2. Cognition is an adaptive process that functions to make an individual’s
behavior more viable given a particular environment
3. Cognition organizes and makes sense of one’s experience
4. Knowing has roots in both biological/neurological construction, and social,
cultural, and language-based interactions
Types of Constructivism
Cognitive Constructivism
This is typically associated with information processing and relies heavily on
the component process of cognition.
1. The processes of learning
2. How experiences and represented or symbolized in the mind
3. How representations are organized within the mind
Radical Constructivism
It believes, on the other hand, believes that the acquisition of knowledge is
an adaptive process that could be attributed from the active cognition of an
individual translating an experientially based mind. It maintains that there is
an internal nature of knowledge. Also, it recognizes the existence of an
external reality that is unknowable to the individual.
Social Constructivism
Upholds the social nature of knowledge and that knowledge is the result of
social interaction and language usage, and thus is a shared, rather than an
individual experience.
Constructivist Pedagogy
1. Authentic and real-world environments are necessary for learning to take
place
2. Social negotiation and mediation should be taken into account in any form
of learning
3. Content and skills are made significant to the learners
4. Learners prior knowledge is fundamental in the acquisition of content and
skills
5. Formative assessment should be done to inform future learning
experiences
6. Constructivism encourages learners to become self-regulated, self-
mediated, and self-aware.
7. Teachers should act as guides and facilitators of learning
8. Teachers must employ multiple perspectives and representations of
content
Linking Constructivism to the Social Studies Curriculum
The nature of social studies as a learning program complements the ideas
of constructivism as a learning philosophy. The ethic of freedom, identities,
and civic competence works well with what constructivism is espousing.
Combining both ensures the development of a holistic 21st century Filipino
learner.
Basics of Instructional Planning
For instructional planning to be considered effective, it is important for
teachers to address these three questions:
1. What should be taught
2. How should it be taught
3. How should instruction and student learning be assessed?
In planning for effective instruction, two vital characteristics are expected of
teachers.
Types of Instructional Planning
A. Long-range Planning
The current curriculum guide for every grade level already divided the
content into four quarters, each one revolving around a specific theme.
B. Unit Planning
A unit is a major division of the year-long plan. It is a cluster of related lessons
organized around a central topic, theme, issue, or problem and developed in
a logical sequence.
In planning a unit, Beal and Bolick (2013) recommended taking into account
the following elements and processes:
1. Unit title
2. Time requirement
3. List of topics
4. Target students
5. Rationale
6. Goals
7. Objectives
8. Teaching strategies
9. Resources
10. Evaluation Procedures
C. Lesson Planning
This document serves as an outline of what you will be teaching in a givern
day or days. It should follow a logical sequence that will facilitate maximum
learning for students
Daily Lesson Plan (DLP)
A teachers roadmap for a lesson. It contains a detailed description of the
steps a teacher will take to teach a particular topic, it contains objectives,
content, learning resources, procedures, remarks, and reflection.
Daily Lesson Log (DLL)
A template teachers use to log parts of their daily lesson. It contains objects,
content, learning resources, procedures, remarks, and reflection.
Things to Consider in Lesson Planning
Content
One of the primary elements that should be considered in instructional
planning is the content. Basically, teachers need to know what they will teach
in order to effectively prepare their lesson.
Objectives
An objective is a specific statement of a learning outcome. It describe what
we want our students to do and how we will know if they are already there.
In the K to 12 Curriculum Guide, statements of learning out comes are
expressed through standards and competencies. Standards are more
general outcome statements that can be achieved in weeks, quarters, year,
or years. The table below shows examples of different levels of standards in
the social studies curriculum.
Inquiry Model
Ellis (2010) defines inquiry as an investigative process based on the
examination of evidence, often using questioning, hypothesis testing, and
data gathering to arrive at an evidence-based conclusion. Introduced by
John Dewey in the 1920s, this model is one of the most common indirect
approaches in social studies instruction and is also often used by social
scientists in the conduct of historical, anthropological, and sociological
research
The use of the inquiry model in social studies has some benefits. Because it
is a student-centered approach, it can increase student motivation and active
participation especially if the questions posed by the teacher are interesting
and challenging. It also promotes the development of research skills and the
use of critical thinking since students are asked to use multiple sources to
arrive at valid conclusion.
There are many inquiry models that can be sued by social studies teachers.
An example of this is from Banks (1990) who outlined the following steps:
1. Pose a question for inquiry. Make sure that the question be answered
using data and evidence.
2. Encourage students to formulate hypotheses. Use observation, prior
experiences, and logic to arrive at as many hypotheses as possible
3. Gather and analyze data. Be involved in the data collection process to
ensure that students will draw valid and reliable conclusions.
4. Determine whether to accept or reject the hypotheses based on the
conclusion. Have students publicly present the inquiry process and their
findings.
Cooperative Learning Model
Chapin (2013) defines cooperative learning as a popular instructional
approach in which small groups of students work together toward a common
learning goal. Since schools are tasked to develop not only the cognitive
capacities of students but also their social and interpersonal skills, many
teachers utilize this model in their instruction. Cooperative learning promotes
positive relationship with peers and trains students to collaborative with
people, skills that are very much needed in the real world.
In planning cooperative learning, Chapin (2013) suggests to consider the
following elements:
1. Objectives and tasks. Ensure that cooperative learning is compatible with
the objectives
2. Size of the group and the method of assigning members. Experts have
different opinions on the ideal size of groups. Cohen (1994) suggests not
more than five while Kagan (1994) believes that perfect number is four. Also,
teachers should implement heterogeneous grouping and ensure that there
is a fair distribution of abilities and gender in the groups.
3. Roles. Teachers should ensure that members of the group have roles to
play.
4. Room arrangement and materials. Groups must be seated near each
other to allow ease of communication.
An example of the cooperative learning model is the Student Teams-
Achievement Division or STAD. This model promotes individual
accountability and teamwork through the following procedure:
1. Direct Instruction: The teacher enumerates the objects and presents the
lesson through lecture, discussion, or demonstration.
2. Teams. The class is divided into heterogeneous small groups.
3. Quiz. After the group session, students are given individual quizzes
4. Individual Progress Score. Scores in the present quiz will be compared to
scores in the past exams.
5. Team recognition. Teams that reach or go above the set criterion score
will receive recognition through awards or bonus points.
Developing Lesson Plan for Social Studies
1. Comprehensive Lesson Plan
A comprehensive lesson plan contains a detailed description of the steps in
the teaching and learning process.
2. Abbreviated Lesson Plan
In contrast to a comprehensive lesson plan, an abbreviated lesson plan
contain less details. This format is usually utilized by more experienced
teachers as a substitute for comprehensive planning, especially in lessons
that do not require major preparation.
Important Components of a Lesson Plan
1. Objectives. Teachers may develop specific objectives for a given lesson.
In writing objectives, teachers, should ensure that they are specific and
measurable and describes what the students should know or be able to do.
2. Content. The content part states the actual topic or subject that will be
discussed for the day or the following days.
3. Learning Resources. In this part, teachers list down the references that
hey used in the development of the lesson.
4. Procedures. The procedures portion is the longest part of the lesson plan.
It contains the steps and activities that will be done to achieve the objectives.
5. Remarks. In this part, teachers indicate whether they have finished the
lesson or not within the given time frame.
6. Reflection. As a reflective practitioners, teachers should assess their
instruction, filling out this portion right after the delivery of the lesson.
Some Tips in Developing a Lesson Plan
1. Be familiar with the different instructional models in social studies.
2. Use an outline in your lesson plan.
3. Indicate the time allotment for every activity to help you manage the
schedule and maximize student’s time for learning
4. Provide clear transitions from one subtopic to another.
5. Include a variety of activities and minimize teacher talk to sustain students
attention.
Lecture-Discussion
Lecture-discussion is perhaps the most widely used instructional strategy
across all grade levels and subject areas. The lecture-discussion strategy is
founded on the cognitive theory of education which believes that students
internally organize and process the information they receive, thus making
them active participants in the learning process.
Steps
The lecture-discussion strategy is done by following these four basic steps:
1. Introduction. The teacher begins the lesson by providing motivation
activity, presenting the objectives, and giving an overview of the topic.
2. Presentation of the lesson. The teacher proceeds to the unfolding of the
topic through the use of question-and-answer techniques and visual
organizers.
3. Comprehension monitoring. The teacher checks students understanding
through different strategies of formative assessment
4. Integration and closure. Students summarize the lesson by highlighting
the important points, synthesizing old and new information, and/or sharing
evidence-based conclusions.
Graphic Organizers
Graphic Organizers provide a visual representation in developing and
summarizing students learning components. They help structure disjointed
information by creating patters that represent the interconnectedness of
ideas (Tacaiochta & Leibheal, 2008).
Why Use Graphic Organizers?
1. It facilitates critical and creative thinking. Graphic organizers allow the
learners to focus only on the highlighted essential components.
2. It organizes information. The human mind if designing to store information
using a series of networks.
3. It shows relationship. One good relationship example that is always used
is the broad-to-specific relationship.
4. It allows self-directed learning. The good thing about graphic organizers
is that it can be used for independent learning among the learners.
5. It encourages interaction. This form of teaching strategy literally engages
the learners to participate in class activities.
6. It is a form of assessment. Teachers can assess learning both before and
after the discussion.
How to Use Graphic Organizers
1. Familiarize yourself with different types of graphic organizers
2. Explain to students what graphic organizers are and why they are useful
in learning
3. Present the specific graphic organizer for a topic
4. Use examples to illustrate the use of some graphic organizers
5. Assign the graphic organizer as an individual, paired, or group activity
6. Review students’ work. Generate classroom discussion on the effective
use of graphic organizers
Eight Types of Graphic Organizers for Social Studies
1. Assume and Anticipate – This form of graphic organizers is best for
formative assessment where teachers evaluate the schema of the learners
on a certain topic.
2. Position and Pattern. This type of graphic organizer help teachers and
students see the relationship of a concept with another, particularly in
chronological order and how the pattern occurs and reoccurs in different
contexts and events.
5. Relate and Reason. The idea behind this type of graphic organizers
revolves around the use of inductive and deductive thinking patters.
6. Identify and Imagine. These organizers use various shapes and forms to
visually represent several concepts or pieces of information.
7. Estimate and Evaluate. This type of organizer shows how to evaluate
and explain concepts through visual perspectives.