0% found this document useful (0 votes)
5 views46 pages

Ironman 3 Report

This document is a project report submitted by Vishal Tripathi to the Institute of Management Education in Sahibabad, Ghaziabad. The report studies the fast moving consumer goods sector in India, with a focus on the tea industry. The 3-page document includes sections acknowledging the guidance provided by Dr. Taruna Gautam in completing the project report. It also provides certification that the project was completed under the required guidance.

Uploaded by

vikas chaurasia
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
5 views46 pages

Ironman 3 Report

This document is a project report submitted by Vishal Tripathi to the Institute of Management Education in Sahibabad, Ghaziabad. The report studies the fast moving consumer goods sector in India, with a focus on the tea industry. The 3-page document includes sections acknowledging the guidance provided by Dr. Taruna Gautam in completing the project report. It also provides certification that the project was completed under the required guidance.

Uploaded by

vikas chaurasia
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 46

A project report on
5740.970547943

«A STUDY INTO THE FMCG SECTOR IN INDIA


$%&%%$%#
(TEA INDUSTRY)”
%&$%#

2011
 

SUBMITTED BY
$&%%
Vishal Tripathi
'8,%75,9
ROLL NO. 10113
#

UNDER THE GUIDANCE OF


&#%&

Dr. Taruna Gautam


7%,7:3,,:9,2


Soy
An
x

re
TE
; [hannnſ[

»[Þur'{]


nw
sell
e
IÞ*


ae
Pa

Department Of Management
05,7920391,3,02039
INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT EDUCATION, SAHIBABAD
$%%&%%&%$













ATSHT

TE EZ Institute of Management Education


=== = G.T. Read, Sahibabad, Ghaziabad - 201 005 (U.P)
mera





CERTIFICATE
#%%



This8 8
%
%8 is  94
8 to .0791
certify
94.079 that9 9
1 9,
9,9 the0 prject
90 study 990/
570.9  89:/ titled $%&
“A$%&
 STUDY  % INTO %
% THE  
% FMCG 
 
SECTOR IN INDIA
$%#
(TEA  &
%
% INDUSTRY)”
&$%#$%# is  ,
 8
8 a bonafied
-4
-43,
3,110/ work
0/ 4
47 carried
7 .,
.,77
770
0/ out 9 by
/ 4:
4:9 - Vishal, %75
- '8
'8, Trpathi in
,9 3
%75,9
partial fulfillment of the requirement for the award of Post Graduate Diploma in
5,79,1:120394190706:70203914790,,7/41!4897,/:,90542,3
Management approved by AICTE under our guidance and direction.
,3,02039,5574;0/-%:3/074:7:/,3.0,3//70.943


Guided by: Dr. Taruna Gautam
:/0/-7%,7:3,,:9,2



Signature:
$3,9:70









ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 %$




It is my pleasure and honor to present this report and say a few heartfelt words
98250,8:70,3/434794570803998705479,3/8,,100,7910947/8
for the people040705,79419870547933:20
147905045 who were part 419870547933:2074:8
147905045040705,79 of this report in numerous ways, people04,;0
74:8,85045 who gave
,8504504,;0
a lot of support right from the stage of conceiving the project.
,49418:554797917429089,041.43.0;3905740.9
I am extremely grateful to my guided by Dr. Taruna Gautam, 4,8-003,
,20970207,901:942:/0/-7%,7:3,,:9,2 who has been a
motivator
249; and source of inspiration.
249;,947,3/84:7.0413857, His uninhibited
,947,3/84:7.0413857,9438:33 guidance
9438:33-90/:/ and valuable0958
-90/:/,3.0,3/;,:,- tips
,3.0,3/;,:,-0958
have been responsible to put in my best efforts in working on this project. My
,;0-0037085438-0945:932-0890114798347343985740.9

special thanks to him for giving me a direction for the project. 


850.,9,38942147;320,/70.943147905740.9























OBJECTIVES

% OF THE$%&
%'$% STUDY
'$%$%&

The purpose of this study is to get familiarized with the Indian Tea Industry and
%05:75480419889:/894091,2,70/9903/,3%0,3/:897,3/
its marketing to International markets. In order to accomplish this objective, the
982,70939439073,943,2,7098347/0794,..4258984-0.9;090
present project covers the following objectives:
57080395740.9.4;0789014434-0.9;08

e  %49905708039,709$.03,74413/,%0,3/:897
O To highlight the present Market Scenario of India Tea Industry.

e %
O To4 0,2
examine
0 ,23
30 the0 prospects
0 9
90 57
5748
4850
50.9
.98 of  India
8 41
41 3/
3/, Tea, Industry
, %0
%0, 3/
3/:8
:897
97 in  90
 3
3 the0 International
9 3907
39073,
3,9
943
43,
,
Market
,709

e  %4/039190574-028413/,%0,3/:8975479949039073,943,
O To identify the problems of India Tea Industry Export to the International
Market. 
,709
°*  %434908.03,744147/%0,,709
O
To know the scenario of World Tea Market.
e  %470.42203/8420.4770.9;020,8:708947084;090574-028
O To recommend some corrective measures to resolve the problems

























METHODOLOGY OF THE STUDY
%%$%&

This research is an elaborate study to enable us to understand the whole scenario


%87080,7.8,30,-47,9089:/9403,-0:894:3/0789,3/90408.03,74
of1 India
4 Tea
3/, % 0, Industry
3/:897 9to4 9the
0 International
390
9073 market.
73,,943, 2 ,7
,7 Collected
09  data
40.90/ /,9, ,and
3 /
information were tabulated, processed and analyzed critically in order to make
31472,9430709,-:,90/574.0880/,3/,3,0/.79.,347/07942,0
the study more informative, fruitful and purposeful.
9089:/247031472,9;017:91:,3/5:754801:
In preparing this report I have used secondary data and information .Most of the
35705,7398705479,;0:80/80.43/,7/,9,,3/31472,9434894190
data have been collected from secondary sources. The secondary information is
/,9,,;0-003.40.90/174280.43/,784:7.08%080.43/,731472,9438
collected from various, ,79.0870,90/990%0,!,39
.40.90/1742;,74:8
.40 articles related with the Tea !,39,943%0,,709
.90/1742;,74:8,79.0870,90/990%0, Plantation, Tea Marketing,
,943%0,,7093
3
Newspapers,
085,50
08 India Tea 4,7/,3/
5,50783/,%0, Board, ,3/
783/,%0,4,7/ and 0-
Web 5479,39073,943,
portal, International
0-5479,39073,9 Tea Boards, !
43, %0,4,7/8
%0,4,7/8 EPB,
!
Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO) etc.
44/,3/7.:9:7,7,3,94309.






















Content
439039

 PARTICULARS
!#%&#$ PAGE
! No.4


 1. INTRODUCTION
%#&% 7


Policies and food Laws


!4.08,3/144/,8 | 
10
Key players in India
05,07833/, Il


 2.8947190,
History Of tea | 12
Global tea industry
4-,90,3/:897 16
Global competition
4-,.42509943 20


Characteristics of tea Industry
,7,.90789.84190,3/:897 7

SWOT Analysis of Indian Tea industry
$%3,88413/,3%0,3/:897
2
 3

 diPAysislayers
%45 in tea industry and their SWOT
!,078390,3/:897,3/907$%
,3,88 1


Recommendation to improve their market share |


#0.42203/,943942574;09072,7098,70 41

 References
#010703.08 43


5.
 Conclusion
43.:843 45




































CHAPTER 1
!%#
FAST MOVING CONSUMER GOODS (FMCG)
$%'$&#$









 









We regularly talk about 9938090,-:9907549,
070:,79,,-4:
070: things like090,-:9907549,94.589449
,79,,-4:9938 tea, butter, potato94.5894495,89
chips, toothpastes, razors,
5,89087,478
087,478
household
4:
4:80
804/ care0 products,
4/ .,7
.,70 57
574/:
4/:.98  packaged
.98 5,.
5,.,0
,0/ food  ,3/
/ 144/
144/ and  beverages,
,3/ -0;
-0;07,
07,08 etc.  :
0809.
09. But 9 /4
:9 do we
/40 know
0 3
34
4
under which category these things come? They are called FMCGs. FMCG is an
:3/07..,90479080938.420%0,70.,0/88,3
acronym for ,894;3438:20744/8
,.7432147 Fast Moving Consumer Goods, .70107949389,90-:
which refer to things that we buy
from local supermarkets on daily basis, the things that have high turnover and
17424.,8:5072,709843/,-,88909389,9,;09:734;07,3/
are relatively cheaper and there cost is relatively low.
,7070,9;0.0,507,3/9070.489870,9;04
FMCG

 industry,
 3/:
3/:8897
97 alternatively
 ,
,90
90773,
3,9
9;
;0
0 called
 .,
.,
0/ as  
0/ ,8
,8 CPG
! (Consumer
! 
43
438:
8:2 07 packaged
207 5,.
,.,
,0/ goods)
0/ 44
44/8
/8

industry
3/:
3/:89 7 primarily
897 572
572,7
,7 deals
 /0,
/0 8 with
,8 9
9 the0 production,
 9
90 57
574/
4/:.9
:.94
43 distribution
3 /89
/897-
7-:9
:94
43 and/ 2
3 ,3
,3/ marketing
,7
,709
093 of
3 41
consumer packaged goods. The Fast Moving Consumer Goods (FMCG) is those
.438:2075,.,0/44/8%0,894;3438:20744/889480
consumables
.4
.438
38:2
:2,-
,-0
08 which
8 
.
. are0 3
 ,7
,70 normally
47
472
2,
, consumed
 .438
.438:2 0/ by
:20/ - the0 .438
- 90
9 consumers
.438:2
:207
078 at  ,
8 ,9
,9 a 70
regular
70:
:,
,7
7
interval.
3907; Some of the prime activities
3907;,$42041905720,.9; of FMCG industry
,$42041905720,.9;908413/:89 are selling, 2,7093
908413/:897,70803 marketing, 
7,708032,7093
financing,
13,
13,3.
3.3  purchasing,
3 5:7
5:7.
.,8
,83
3 etc.  %
 09.
09. The0 3
%0 industry
3/:
/:89
897 also
7 ,84
, engaged
84 03
03,
, in 45
0/ 3 operations,
4507,
07,94
9438
38 supply
 8:55
8:55

chain,
.,
.,3  production
3 574
574/:.
/:.94
943 and  03
3 ,3/
,3/ general
0307,
07, management.
 2 ,3,
,3,0203
02039 This8 project
9 %
%8 574
5740.
0.9 helps
58 us
9 058
0 :8 understand
:8 :3/
:3/0789
0789,3/
,3/
the %0,,7098
90 Tea Markets ,85,7941903/:897
as part of the FMCG industry.


Key Segments:
0$020398

The FMCG sector consists of four product categories, each with its own hosts of
%080.947.4388984114:7574/:.9.,9047080,.99843489841
products that have relatively quick turnover and low costs:
574/:.989,9,;070,9;06:.9:734;07,3/4.4898




















 Fabric wash (laundry soaps and
,-7.,8,:3/784,58,3/
 8synthetic
3909. /detergents);
09070398
Household Care
4:804/,70 Household
 4:804/4/ Cleaners(dish/utensil
 0,3070788/8:90 :9038
 .cleaners,
0,3078 1floor
447 .cleaners,
0,3078 9toilet 409
.cleaners,
0,3078 air
,7 1fresheners,
70803078
insecticides and mosquito
380.9./08,3/2486:94
repellents, metal polish and
70500398209,548,3/
furniture polish)
1:739:70548


 Oral
7, care, .,70 hair
 ,7 .care,
,70 8skin
3
 care,
.,70 personal
507843, wash
 , 8 
Personal Care
!07843,,70 (soaps);
84,58 .cosmetics
48209.8 ,and
3 /
 9toiletries;
409708 deodorants;
/ 04/47,398
perfumes;
5071:208 1feminine
02330
hygiene; paper products.
0305,507574/:.98


 Health
0,9 beverages;
- 0;07,08 Tea;
% 0, 8soft
419 
Food & Beverage
44/0;07,0 drinks;
/738 products
574/:.98 (biscuits,
-8.:98
 bread,
-70,/ .cakes);
,08 8snack
3,. 1food;
44/
.chocolates;
4.4,908 ice .0 .cream;
70,2 .coffee; 41100
8soft
419 /drinks;
738 processed
574.0880/ 1fruits,
7:98
vegetables;
; 009,-08 dairy
/,7 products;
574/:.98
bottled water; branded
-4990/,907-7,3/0/












POLICIES:
!$

India
3/
3/, has  03,.9
, ,8
,8 enacted
03 0/ policies
,.90/ 54
54
.0
.08 aimed
8 ,2
,20/ at  ,9
0/ ,9
,9 attaining
,99,
9,3
33 intemational
3 3907
39073,
3,9
943
43, competitiveness
, .4
.425
2509
099
9;0
;0308
3088
8
9through
74:  lifting
193 4of1 9the
0 
quantitative
6:,
6:,39
399,9
9,9;0 restrictions,
;0 708
70897.
97.94
9438
38 reduced
 70/
70/:.0/ excise
:.0/ 0.
0.8
80 duties,
0 /:9
/:908
08 automatic
 ,:9
,:942
42,9
,9. foreign
. 147
1470
03 investment
3 3;
3;0892
0892039
039
,and
3/ 1food
44/ laws
,8 
resulting
708
708:9
:93 in ,3
3 3 an 03;
environment
03;74
7432
32039 that9 148
039 9,
9,9 fosters
1489078 growth.
9078 7
749
49 100 per
 
 507 cent 9 05
507 .03
.039 export
05479 oriented
479 47
47039
0390/
0/
units
:398 .can
,3 be
-0 8set09 up
:5 
by govemment
- 4;0732
07320039 approval
574;, ,and
39 ,55
,5 3/ use
:80 4of1 1foreign
47 3 brand
47003 names
-7,3/ 3,
3,2
208 is  3
08 8
8 now
4 1freely
4 700
00

permitted.
5072990/


Food laws:
44/,8

Consumer protection against adulterated food has been brought to the fore by
438:20757490.943,,389,/:907,90/144/,8-003-74:994901470-
"The
%
%0 Prevention
0 !7
!70;
0;03
039
943 ofFood
43 41
4144/ Adulteration
44/ /:
/:9
907
07,9
,94
43 Act 9 !
3 .
.9 (PFA),
 1954",
!  which
. applies
. ,55
,5 508 to 
08 94
94
domestic
/4
/42208
089
9. and/ 2
. ,3/
,3 imported
254
5479
790/ food
0/ 14
144/ commodities,
4/ .42
.4224/4/9
90
08 encompassing
8 03
03.4
.42
25,
5,88
883 food
3 144/
14 colour
4/ .44
.44:7 and/
:7 ,3/
,3
preservatives, pesticide residues, packaging, labeling and
570807;,9;085089./0708/:085,.,3,-03,3/
Regulation of sales
#0:,943418,08
















10



KEY PLAYERS IN THE INDIAN FMCG INDUSTRY IN INDIA:
!#$%&$%#

425,3
425,3
1. Hindustan Unilever Ltd.
3/:89,3&30;079/
2. %3/,3%4-,..4425,3
 ITC (Indian Tobacco Company)
3. 089F3/,
 Nestle India
4. &
 GCMMF (AMUL)
5. ,-:73/,9/
 Dabur India Ltd
6. 8,3!,3983/,
 Asian Paints (India)
7. Cadbury India
,/-:73/,
8. 79,33,3/:897089/
 Britannia Industries Ltd.
9. !74.907,2-0030,3/0,9,70
 Procter & Gamble Hygiene and Health Care
10. Marico Industries Ltd
,7.43/:897089/

























Il





















CHAPTER 2
!%#
HISTORY OF TEA
$%#%
















12



Little
99
 990 did/ 
0 //
/ Chinese
3
3080 Emperor
080 2
2507
50747 Shen
47 $ 03 Nung
$03 :
:3 realize
3 70,
70,0 that,9 3
0 9,9
9 in  
3 2737 B.C., when dried
03/70/
leaves blew into his cup of hot water, the beverage he discovered would cause
0,;08-03948.:54149,90790-0;07,00/8.4;070/4:/.,:80
sensations
80
8038
38,9
,943
438 around
8 ,7
,74:
4:3/ the0 
3/ 9
90 world.
47
47/ During
/ :
:7
73 this8 92
3 9
98 time,
9 water
20 ,
,90
907 was,8
7  always
,8 ,
,, 8 boiled
,8 -4
-4
0/ for
0/ 147
hygienic

03
03. reasons.
. 70,
70,84
8438 The0 5
38 %
%0 pleasant
50,8,3
0,8,39 aroma
9 ,74
,742, and refreshing
2,,3/70170
,3/701708
83 taste9003
39,8
9,890 enchanted
03.,3
.,390/ him  ,3/
90/ 2
2 and
soon everyone in the realm was drinking tea.
84430;0743039070,2,8/73390,
Japan was introduced to tea by Yensei, a returning Buddhist priest residing in
,5,3,83974/:.0/9490,-0380,709:733://8957089708/33
China at the time of the discovery. Tea was immediately embraced by Japanese
3,,9909204190/8.4;07%0,,8220/,9002-7,.0/-,5,3080
society
84.
84.09 and/ 708
09 ,3
,3/ resulted
708:9
:90/ in  9
0/ 3
3 the0 .70
90 creation
.70,9
,94
43 of  9
3 41
41 the0 397
90 intricate
397.
.,90 Japanese
,90 ,5,
,5,30
3080 Tea, 0
80 %0
%0, Ceremony,
0702
70243
43

elevating tea to an art form.
00;,9390,94,3,791472
Tea continued to travel throughout the Orient and it was during the time of the
%0,.4393:0/9497,;0974:4:9907039,3/9,8/:73909204190
Europe
:
:745
7450 annex
0 ,3
,330  plorers
30 5
5470 78 tea
47078 90
90, made
, 2,
2,/0 its  .:
/0 98
98 cultural
.:9
9:7,  broad
:7, -74, / jump.
-74,/ :25
:25 The  ,
 %0
%0 East89 3/
,89 India
3/, Tea,
, %0
%0,
Company
42
425,3
5,3 brought
-74
-74:
:99 tea
90, into
90,3
394 Holland
944
4, but 98
,3/-:9
3/-:9 its  prohibitive
98 574
574-
-9;
9;0 cost 941
0 .48
.489 of 
$100 per
41 507 pound
507 54:
54:3/
3/
kept tea as a rich man's beverage until so much was imported that tea prices fell
05990,,8,7.2,38-0;07,0:39842:.,8254790/9,990,57.0810
and was sold in small food shops.
,3/,884/382,144/8458
In3 1650, Peter
 ! 09 Stuyvesant
09007 $9:;
;08
08,,39 brought
39 -74
74:
: tea, 94
9 90
90, to  9the
94 American
0  207
207.,3 colonists
.,3 .44
.4 43
3898 in  New
898 3
3 0
0
Amsterdam, later called
28907/,2,907.,0/
New York. Soon the colonists were drinking more tea than all England.
047$44390.443898070/733247090,9,3,3,3/
In  3
3
3 England,
3,
,3 tea, 
3/ 90
90, gardens,
,7
,7/
/038 orate
038 47
473
3,90 outdoor
90 4:9
:9/4
/44 events
47 0;
0;00398 with
98  9 1fancy
9 ,3. food
,3. 144
14 and/ 9tea,
4/ ,3
,3/ 0,
0,
fireworks and gambling, seemed to sprout up overnight as entertainment centers
170478,3/,2-380020/948574:9:54;0739,8039079,32039.039078
of the day and many British enjoyed the festivities offered there.
4190/,,3/2,37980340/901089;908411070/9070
Russia discovered tea when ornate chests of the dried leaves were sent to Czar
#:88,/8.4;070/90,03473,90.08984190/70/0,;08070803994,7
Alexis by the Chinese Embassy in Moscow in 1618.
08-9030802-,88348.43 It became Russian custom
9-0.,20#:88,3.:8942

to  8sip
94
94 5 heavily
5 0
0,;
,;
 sweetened
 8
800
0090
9030
30/ tea, 17
/ 90
90, from
1742 a 
42 , glass
,8 in  ,
,888 3
3 a 8;
silver
8 07 holder.
;07 4/0
4/07 Russians
7 #:
#:88
88,
,38 also
38 ,84
,84
enjoyed
03
034
40/ honey
0/ 4
430 or 897
30 47 strawberry
897,- 077 jam
,-077 ,2 stirred
,2 89
8977
770/ into4 90,
0/ 39
394 tea  ,8
90, as 907
their
9 ethnic
07 09
093
3. contribution.
. .43
.4397-
97-:94
:943
3
Even today, vodka and tea are the national beverages of Russia.
;0394/,;4/,,3/90,,70903,943,-0;07,0841#:88,
To recover extensive expenses from the French and Indian War, England levied
%470.4;0709038;00503808174290703.,3/3/,3,73,3/0;0/
a huge tax on tea
,:09,4390,


13



Imported to the colonies, 289,03-00;3
254790/9490.44308
25 4790/9490.44308289,03 mistakenly-00;390.443898
believing 90.44389807084
the colonists 0708444
were so 440/43
hooked on
0/43
it  9
9
9 they'd
90 / pay
0/ 5, anything
5, ,3
,399
3 to  
3 94
94 keep
00
005 their
5 9
907 supply
07 8:
8:55
55 coming
 .4
.4223 in.  
3 3
3 One
30 night
30 3
39 the0 2
9 90
9 men03 of
03 41
Boston
489
4 8943 dressed
43 /70
/7088 880/ as 3
0/ ,8 Indians,
3/
/,3,38 reminiscent
8 702
702338
8.03
.039 of  90
9 41
41 the0 7
9 French
703.
03. and/ 3/,
 ,3/
,3 Indian
3 /,3
3  War,7 894
stole
89 40
0
aboard the ships docked in the Boston harbor and threw the expensive tea cargo
,-4,7/90858/4.0/39048943,7-47,3/9709005038;090,.,74
overboard and into the harbor. England reacted by having a raging fit, closing
4;07-4,7/,3/39490,7-473,3/70,.90/-,;3,7,319.483
Boston's port and sending Royal troops into occupation of Boston. Because of
4894385479,3/803/3#4,9744583944..:5,94341489430.,:8041
this, colonists met to discuss these events and declared a revolution.
98.44389820994/8.:8890800;0398,3//0.,70/,70;4:943
At  43
9
9 one0 point,
430 54
543 39 England
9 3
3 ,3
,3/ even
/ 0;
0;0303 gave
,;
,;0 The0 John
0 %0
% 43
43  Company
425
425,3,3 the0 power
 90
9 54
54007 to  34
7 94
94 not 9 43
349 only
43
import tea but to coin
2547990,-:994.43
its  43
98
98 own  243
43 money,
2430 make0 peace,
0 2,
2,0 50,.0/0.,declare70,
50,.0/0.,70 war
,7 and  4907
7 ,3/
,3/ other
49 07 privileges
57;
57;0 08 previously
008 570;
570;4:4:88 only 
 43
43
held by countries.
0/-.4:39708
In the 1880's,
390 America came to the forefront as the biggest importer of tea due
8207.,.,209490147017439,890-08925479074190,/:0
to faster clipper
941,8907.5507
ships and the ability to pay its debts in gold.
858,3/90,-9945,98/0-9834/
A tea plantation owner introduced iced tea to the St. Louis World's Fair in 1904.
90,5,39,94343073974/:.0/.0/90,9490$94:847/8,73 

It was an extremely warm day and his hot tea booth was being passed up by the
9,8,3097020,72/,,3/84990,-449,8-035,880/:5-90
crowds in favor of cold drinks. As desperate measure, since he was out time and
.74/831,;4741.4//7388/08507,9020,8:7083.00,84:9920,3/
money for even coming to the Fair, headed ice to the vats of liquid hot tea and
24301470;03.4239490,70,/0/.09490;,98416:/4990,,3/
in the process made it one of the highlights of the 1904World's
390574.0882,/094304190984190 Fair.
47/8,7

The tea bag came along as a surprise. Samples of tea at the turn of the twentieth
%090,-,.,20,43,8,8:75780$,25084190,,9909:734190903909
century were given34:9382,8-,8,3/3890,/
.039:7070;0 out in small silk -,8,3/3890,/414503390-,
.039:7070;034:9382,8 bags and instead 414503390-,89090,
of opening the bags,89090,
the tea
bag in its entirety,8-03/74550/39449,907
was being dropped
-,398039709,8-03/7455
-,398039709 into hot water -.438:2078":.,90,
by consumers. ":.,90,
0/39449,907-.438:2078 Quickly, a tea

company
.42
.425,3
5,3 sprang
 85
857,
7,3 into
3 3
394 action
94 ,.9
,.943 and  5,903
43 ,3/
,3/ patented
5,90390/ the  90,
90/ 90
90 tea  bag.
90, -, Thomas
-, %
%42
42,8 J.  59
,8 
 Lipton
5943 was8
43 ,
,8
responsible for designing a four-sided tea he dubbed the 'flo-thru' tea bag, which
7085438-0147/0833,14:78/0/90,0/:--0/901497:90,-,.
allowed tea to steep more quickly in the cup than the customary two-sided bag.
,40/90,948900524706:.390.:59,390.:8942,7948/0/-,
Today tea is grown on tea estates and70% of the tea we drink is grown in Sri
%4/,90,87434390,089,908,3/419090,0/7387433$7
Lanka, India, Indonesia, Kenya, Argentina and China.
,3,3/,3/4308,03,70393,,3/3,




14



The best climates for growing tea are those that are tropical or semi-tropical and
%0-089.2,90814774390,,7094809,9,709745.,478029745.,,3/
tea, .,
90
90, can3 -0
.,3 be  
-0 grown
74
74 on3 84
3 4 soil 9,9
84 that,9 8
9 is  34
8 not 9 1
349 fit9 14
19 for7 74
147 growing
743
3 much
 2 :. of  ,39
:. 41
41 anything
,39
3 else.
3 080
080
Today there are three basic types of tea: black, oolong and green and from these
%4/,9070,709700-,8.95084190,-,.4443,3/7003,3/17429080
3

three typ
types spring over .:9;,90/;,70908%00,;08,705.0/,9:89
9700950885734;07 ,00Q cultivated varieties. The leaves ar Picked at just
e righ Pmorhent designated by the tea estate manager, then crushed to start the
9079242039/083,90/-9090,089,902,3,07903.7:80/9489,7990
oxidation process.
4/,943574.088



























15


GLOBAL TEA INDUSTRY
%&$%#

The0 
%
%0 global
4-,
4-, tea, 3
 90
90, industry
3/:
/:89
897 is  ,
7 8
8 largely
,7
70 domimated
0 /4
/42
23,
3,90
90/ by 3/
/ - India
3/, + 90
, ] the0 80.4
9 second
80.43/ largest
3/ ,7
,708
089
9
producer and the largest consumer of tea. India is succeeded China and followed
574/:.07,3/90,7089.438:2074190,3/,88:..00/0/3,,3/1440/
by
- Kenya
-  03
03, Sri7 
, $ Lanka,
,3, Vietnam
,3, '
'093
093,2 and/ 3
,2 ,3
,3/ Indonesia
3/4
/430
308
8, in  90
, 3
3 the0 production
9 574/
574/:.
:.9
943 hierarchy
43 07,
07,7.
7. of
 41
countries.
.4:39708
The tea industry is peculiar, the soil characteristics, the climate and the rainfall
%090,3/:897850.:,79084.,7,.90789.890.2,90,3/907,31,
determine
/0
/090
9072
723
30 the0 .,7
0 90
9 character
. ,7,.
,.90 7 4of1 9
907 the0 90
90 tea, ,3/
90, and/ 98
,3 its8 9,89
9 taste.
9, 890 Tea
0 % 0, affects
0, ,1
,110
10.9
.98 the0 9,89
8 90
9 taste
9, 0 buds;
890 -:
-:/8
/8

therefore,
90
90701
701470
470 it 8
 9 is  /1
8 difficult
/11.
1.:9 to  705
:9 94
94 replace
705,.0 a 5,7
,.0 , particular
5,79.:
9.:,7 variety
,7 ;,70
;, 9 with
709 9
9 a 8:-89
 , substitute.
8:-899:
9:90 This8
90 %
%8
explains
05
05,
,38 why .079
38 
 certain
.079,3 types
,3 9
9508 are  1,;
508 ,70
,70 favored
1,;470 / by
470/ certain
- .07
.079,
9,3 countries:
3 .4:
.4:397
39708
08 for  0,25
 147
147 example,
0,250 the
090
90
CIS  .42
$
$ (commonwealth
.42243
2430
0,9 of 3/
,9 41 independent
3/050
0503/0
3/039 states
39 89,
89,908 i.e.  #:8
908 0
0 Russia)
#:88
8, countries
, .4:
.4:397
39708 favor
08 1,;
1,;47 Indian
47 3/
3/,3
,3
and Sri Lankan teas. UK and Pakistan favor Kenyan teas.
,3/$7,3,390,8&,3/!,89,31,;4703,390,8

India accounts for 


3/,,..4:398147 26  per
507 cent 941
507 .03
.039 of world's
41 4
47/
7/8 production.
8574
574/:
/:.94 While  $7
.9430
30 Sri  
$7 Lanka,
,3
,3, Kenya
, 0
03,
3,
and  3/
,3/
,3/ Indonesia
3/43
4308
08, are  90
, ,70
,70 the  49
90 other
4907 leading
07 0,
0,/ 3 producers;
/3 57
574/:
4/:.07
.078 their7 .42
8 90
907 combined
.42-3
-30/ production
0/ 574/:
574/:.94
.943 is
3 8
lower 9,39,9413/,,92,083/
407 than that of India. What
4079,39,9413/, makes India,,3390708934-0
an interesting
,92,083/,,33907089 object.94189:/89,9
of study is that
34-0.94189:/89,9
its size is no millstone around its neck; its production growth between 1 
9880834289430,74:3/9830.98574/:.943749-09003 996 ,3/
and
1998 at 5.63
,9 per cent was way ahead/41903.70,80347/
507.039,8,,0, of the increase0347/574/:.9
507.039,8,,0,/41903.70,8 in world 574/:.94341430
production of one
4341430
per cent only.
507.03943
In 
3 2008, world tea production reached over 
47/90,574/:.94370,.0/4;07 4.73 million tones. Producing 1.16
24394308!74/:.3
billion
-
-
43 kilos
43 48 (2.56billion
48 --
43 pounds)
43 54
54:3
:3/8 of  90
/8 41
41 tea, 50
90, per7 0
507 year,
0,7
,7 China
  3 is  90
3, 8
8 the0 3
9 number
:2
:2-0
-07 one0
7 43
430
source for tea on the planet.
84:7.014790,43905,309
At 
9 980million kilos (2.16
24348 billion pounds), India stands at number two. Kenya
-4354:3/83/,89,3/8,93:2-079403,

and Sri Lanka follow.


,3/$7,3,144
When
03
 it  .4
03 9
9 comes
.420
208 to  0
8 94
94 exports,
054
54798
798 China
 
3 , 8ships
3, 
58 out 9 
58 4:
4:9 2972
million
2
43 kilos
43 48 (654.78
48 million
243
pounds) of all types
54:3/841,9508
of tea whereas India, with primarily black tea, moves 
4190,070,83/,9572,7-,.90,24;08 203 million kilos (429.9
24348  
million pounds).
24354:3/8



16


This ranking is fairly recent. Prior to the 1960s,
%87,3381,770.039!7479490 India was the top producer and
83/,,890945574/:.07,3/

0exporter. For
547907  47 0example,
,250 in3 1955,
 India
3 /, 8shipped out
550/ 4:9 165 million
 2 kilos
43 48
48
(363.77
 million
2
2 43 pounds)
43 54:
54:3/8
3/8 of 07
 41 her 949
total, production
949, 57
574/:
4/:.94
.943 of 
3 41 301 million
 2
 4
43 kilos
48 (663.59
3 48
 

aU OARS) Sao RSFSR


RCH BS BBB Be WARE
24354:3/8%0107.07;,79$7,3,8,90944.03-,.
,3/147914794505479075489431742908974:90 8:93
Sri 
$7
$7 Lanka
,3
,3, surpassed
, 8:
8:75
75,88
,880/ India
0/ 3
3/
/, for7 
, 14
147 good
44/ with9 
44/ 
9 211 million
 2
 43 kilos
43 4 8 (465.12
48 million
 2
2
4
43
3
pounds).
54:3/8

China

3
3, caught
, .,
.,:
:9 up  3
9 :5
:5 in  1993
3  with

9 201
9  million
 2
 
4
43 kilos
48 (443.13
3 48
 million
 2
2
43 pounds)
43 54
54:3
:3/8
/8 to 
 94
94
India's
3/
3/,8 175 (385.81million
,8  2
2
43 pounds).
43 54
54:3
:3/8
/8 Kenya's
 0
03
3,8 exports
,8 0
0547
54798 exceeded
98 0
0.0
.00/
0/0/ India’s
0/ 3/
3/,8 that,9
,8 9,9
9
same year with 188
8,200,79 million kilos (414.47million
243482 pounds).47949,574/:.9
24354:3/8
4354:3/8 For total production,
47949,574/:.943
43
India
3/
3/, has8 9,
, ,8
, taken
9,0
03 second
3 80
80.43/ place
.43/ 5
5,.
,.0 to  
0 94
94 China

3, since
3, 83.
83.0 2006.
0  (All 1
 
 figures
1:708 come
:708 .42
.4 from
20 17
1742
42

respective countries’ tea boards.)


70850.9;0.4:3970890,-4,7/8
So, while other sources are ever more aggressive in their outputs, India seems to
$40490784:7.08,700;072470,7088;039074:95:983/,8002894
be  ,
-0
-0 lagging.
,
3 It is 34
3 98 no  8:7
34 surprise
8:757
5780 that,9 
809
9,9 China has 2,
3,,8
3,,8 made
2,/0 fast9 ,
/01,8
1,89 gains
,38 on 90
38 43 the0 7089
439 rest  41
7089 of 90
the
4190
pack, given the increases the country has made in its other industries. But why
5,.;03903.70,80890.4:397,82,/039849073/:89708:9
is this happening in tea, specifically?
898,55033390,850.1.,
What
 ,9 is8 9
the0 1fundamental
90 :3/,2 , 7reason,
3/,20039, 0,8
,8443 if1 9there
0770 is8 43
0 one,0 1for
430 47 India’s
8 8slip
3/,8 in  9tea
5 3
3 0,
0,
supremacy? In my presentation and during the lively question-and-answer that
8:5702,.325708039,943,3//:7390;06:08943,3/,38079,9
followed, I offered a few ideas that seemed to catch the audience’s attention.
1440/411070/,10/0,89,980020/94.,9.90,:/03.08,9903943
The0 14
%0
% follow
14 4 table0 8
4 9,-
9,-0 shows
84
48 the0 ,2
8 9
90 amount
,24:
4:39 of 90,
39 41 tea  production
90, 574/
574/:.
:.9
943 (in3 9430
43 3
 tones)
94308 by 0,
8 - leading
0,/
/3
3
countries in recent year
.4:39708370.0390,7










17


INDIA TEA HISTORY:
%$%#

The tea industry in India is about 1720,784/94..:508,325479,395,.0
%090,3/:89733/,8,-4:9 years old. It occupies an important place
and/ plays
,3
,3/ 5
5,8 a ;0
,8 , very
;07 useful
7 :8
:801:  part
01: 5,
5,79 in  the
79 3
3 90 national
90 3,94
3, 943,
3, economy.
 0.4
0.434
342
2 Robert
 #4
#4-0
-079 Bruce
79  7:.0 in  1823
7:.0 3
3 

discovered
/8
/8.4;
.4;070/ tea  plants
070/ 90,
90, 5,
5,398 growing
3987
74
43 wild/ 3:5507
3
/ in upper  7
3:5507 Brahmaputra
7,2
,2,5:
,5:97, Valley.
97, ',
',0
0 In  1838
 3
3 the
90

first
178
1 9 Indian
789 3/
3/,
,3 tea, 17
3 90
90, from
1742 Assam
42  88
88,2 was,8
,2  ,8 8sent
039 to  &3
039 94
94 United
&39
90/ Kingdom
0/ 
3
3/
/42 for7 public
42 147
14 5:
5:-
-. sale.
. 8,0
8, 0

Thereafter, it was extended to other parts of the country between 50's
%070,19079,80903/0/9449075,7984190.4:397-09003 and 
8,3/ 60's
8
of1 9the
4 0 last
,899 .century.
,8 03
039:
9:7
7 However,
  4
40;
0;07
07 owing
 4
43
3 to  .0
 94
94 certain
.0779, specific
9,3 850.
85 1. 8soil
0.1. and/ .2
4 ,3/
,3 climatic
.2,,9.
9.
7requirements
06:702 03998 its98 .:
0203 cultivation
.: ,943 was
9;,9 ,8 .confined
431
3130/ 9to4 4
30/ only
3 .certain
079,3 parts of1 9the
5,798 4 0 
country.Tea
.4:3
.4:397% is an3,74-,80/.422
97%0,8, agro-based
0,8,3,74- commodity
,80/.4224/9 and is subjected
4/9 ,3/88:-0 to vagaries8413,9:70
,3/88:-0.90/94;,,70 of nature.
.90/94;,,708413,9:70
Despite
08
085
590 adverse
90 ,/;
,/;078
0780 agro
0 ,
,74 climatic
74 .2
.2,9
,9. condition
. .43
.43/9
/943 experienced
43 050
05070
703.0
3.0/ in  90,
/ 3
3 tea  743
90, growing
743 areas8 3
 ,70,
,70,8 in
many
2 ,3 years,
,3 0
0,7 8 Indian
,78 3/
/,3 Tea
,3 % 0, Plantation
0, !
!,3
,39,
9,9
943 Industry
43 3
3/:
/:8897
97 is  ,-0
 8
8 able0 94
,- to  2
94 maintain
,3
,39,
9,3 substantial
3 8:-8
8:-89,
9,39
39,
,
growth
74
749 in  70,
9 3
3 relation
70,9
94 to  ;
43 94
94 volume
4
4:2
:20 of  Indian
0 41
41 3/
3/,
,3 tea, production
3 90
90, 574/:
74/:.9
.94
43 during
3 /:
/:773 the0 ,89
3 90
9 last89 43
, one0
430
decade.
/0.,/
/0.,/0 Tea, 8
0 %0
%0, is ,3
an  088
,3 essential
08803
039
9, item
, 9
902 of  /4
02 41
41 domestic
/420
2089 89. consumption
. .4
.438
38:2
:259
594
43 and/ 8
3 ,3
,3/ is  90
8 the0 2,
9 major
2,47
47
beverage in India. Tea is ,84.438/070/
-0;07,033/,%0,8
-0; 07,033/,%0,8,84 also .438/070/,
considered ,890.0,5089
as890.0,5089-0;07,0,2438
the cheapest -0;07,0,2438990
beverage amongst 990 the
beverages
-0;07,08
-0; available
07,08 ,;, in 3
,;,,-03
,-03 India.
3/, Tea  3
/, %0,
%0, Industry
3/:897 provides
/:897574
574;/0
;/08 gainful:/70
8 ,31
,31: direct.902542
/70.9 employment
02542039
039
to more  9,
942470
942470 than3,
9,3 a 2
, million
2 workers782
43470
4347078 mainly
2 ,3
,3 drawn
/7,
/7,3 from  90
3 1742
1742 the0 -,.
9 backward
-,.,7
,7/ and  84.,
/,3/
,3/ socially
84.,

weaker
0,
0,0
07 section
7 80.
80.94
943 of 9
3 41 the0 84
90 society.
84.09
.09 It 8
 9 is  ,8
8 also4,
,84 a 8:-89
, substantial
8:-89,39
,39, foreign
,147
14703 exchange
03 0.,
0 earner
.,300,7307
300,7307
and  provides
,3/
,3/ 574
574;/
;/08 sizeable
08 8
80,
0,-0 amount
-0 ,2
,24:3
4:39 of 70;
9 41 revenue
70;03: 0 to
03:0 94 the  $9,
94 90
90 State90 ,3/
$9,90 and  0
,3/ Central
0397
397, Exchequer.
, 
.0
.06:0
6:07
7
The0949
%
%0 total,9:734;0741
turnover0741
949,9:734; of 9
the0 3
90 Indian
3/,
/,3 tea  3
390,
90, industry
3/:8
/:897 is  390
97 8
8 in the ;.3
vicinity
; of #8
.3941
941 Rs.9000 Crs.
78

Presently, Indian tea industry is having (as on 18.12.2009)


!7080393/,390,3/:8978,;3,843

1692
 7registered
089070/  Tea
% 0, Manufacturers,
 ,3:1,.9:7078
2200
  7registered
089070/ Tea
% 0, Exporters,
 5479078
5848 3
 number
:2-07 of1
4 7registered
089070/ 9tea
0, buyers,
-:078
Nine tea Auction centers.
3090,:.943.039078




18


The tea industry in India is about 1720,784/94..:508,325479,395,.0
%090,3/:89733/,8,-4:9 years old. It occupies an important place
and/ plays
,3
,3/ 5
5,
,8 a ;0
8 , very
;07 useful
7 :8
:801:  part
01: 5,
5,79 in  the
79 3
3 9
90 national
0 3,
3,94
943,
3, economy.
 0.
0.43
4342
42 Robert
 #4
#4-0
-079 Bruce
79 7
7:.
:.0 in 1823
0 3 

discovered
/8
/8.4;
.4;070/ tea  plants
070/ 90,
90, 5,
5,398 growing
398 74
743 wild/ 3:5507
3 
/ in upper  
3:5507 Brahmaputra
7,2
7,2,5:
,5:97, Valley.
97,',
',0  In3 1838
0 the
90

first
178
1 9 Indian.tea
789 3/
3/,
,3
3 90
90, from
, 17
1742 Assam
42  88
88,2 was
,2  ,8 8sent
,8 039 to  &39
039 94
94 United
&3 0/Kingdom
90/ 
3
3/
/42 for7 5public
42 147
14 :-
:-. sale.
. 8,0
8, 0

Thereafter, it was extended to other parts of the country between 50's
%070,19079,80903/0/9449075,7984190.4:397-09003 and 
8,3/ 60's
8
of1 90
4 the0 ,
9 last89 .03
,8 century.
.039:7
:7 However,
 4
40;
0;07
07 owing
 4
43  9to4 .0
3 certain
.079
79,3 8specific
,3 50. 1. 8soil
0.1.  ,and
4 3/ climatic
3/ .2
.2,9
,9.
.
requirements its cultivation was confined to only certain parts of the country.
706:702039898.:9;,943,8.43130/9443.079,35,7984190.4:397


Major Tea Growing Regions:
,47%0,743#0438

Tea plantations in India are mainly located in rural hills and backward areas of
%0,5,39,943833/,,702,34.,90/37:7,8,3/-,.,7/,70,841
North-eastern and Southern States. Major tea growing areas of the country are
4790,89073,3/$4:9073$9,908,4790,743,70,84190.4:397,70
concentrated in Assam, West Bengal, Tamil Nadu and Kerala. The other areas
.43.0397,90/388,208903,%,2,/:,3/07,,%04907,70,8
where 90,874394,82,09039,70,73,9,
tea is grown to a small extent 9,70,73,9,,%75:7
07090,874394,82,0903
070 are Karnataka,,%75:7,2,.
Tripura,,2,.,!7,/08
Himachal,!7,/08
Pradesh,
Uttaranchal,
&99,
&9 9,7,
7,3.
3.,
, Arunachal
 7
7:3
:3,.,.,
, Pradesh,
 !7
!7,/,/08
08
 Manipur,
,35
,35: :7
7 $Sikkim,

22 Nagaland,
,,
,,,3
,3/ Meghalaya,
/  0,
0,,,,
,

Mizoram,
47
 47,2,2 Bihar
 
,,7 and/ 788
7 ,3
,3/ Orissa.
7 , Unlike
88, &3
&3
00 2most
48
489 other
9 490
49 07 tea, producing
7 90,
90 574/
574/:. :.3
3 and  0
 ,3/
,3/ exporting
054
5479
793
3
countries,
.4:39708
.4:3 9708 India,,8/:,2,3:1,.9:73
3/ has dual manufacturing
3/,,8/:,2,3:1,.9 base. India produces 8-49%7:8
:73-,803/,574/:.0 both CTC (Crush,
-,803/,574/:.08-49%7 :8
Tear, Curl) and Orthodox teas in addition to green tea. The weight age lies with
%0,7:7,3/794/490,83,//94394700390,%009,0089
the former due to domestic consumers preference. Orthodox tea production is
90147207/:094/42089..438:207857010703.0794/490,574/:.9438
balanced basically with the export demand. Production of green tea in India is
-,,3.0/-,8.,99005479/02,3/!74/:.94341700390,33/,8
small.
82,
82 , The0 .42
 %
%0 competitors
.425095099
947
478 to  3
8 94
94 India
3/
/, in  90,
, 3
3 tea  0
90, export
054
5479 are  $
79 ,70
,70 Sri7 
Lanka,
,3
,3, Kenya,
, 0
03,
3, China,
 
3,
3,

Indonesia and Vietnam.
3/4308,,3/'093,2









19


Global competition
 4-,.42509943

The major competitive countries in tea in the world are Sri Lanka, Kenya, China
%02,47.425099;0.4:39708390,39047/,70$7,3,03,3,
and  3/43
,3/
,3/ Indonesia.
3/4308
08, China
, 
3, is 9
3, 8 the0 2,
90 major
47 producer
2,47 574
574/:
/:.07 of 7003
.0741
41 green
7 tea  
003 90,
90, while0 $7
0 Sri  ,
$7 Lanka
,3
3, and
, ,3/
Indonesia are producing mainly orthodox varieties of tea. Kenya is basically a
3/4308,,70574/:.32,34794/4;,709084190,03,8-,8.,,
CTC tea producing country. While India is facing competition from Sri Lanka
%90,574/:.3.4:39703/,81,.3.425099431742$7,3,
and/ Indonesia
,3
,3/ 3/
3/43
4308
08, with9 70
, 
9 regard
70,
,7/ to  054
7/ 94
94 export
0 5479 of  47
79 41
41 orthodox
479
94
4/4
/4 teas
 90,8
90 and/ 17
,8 ,3/
,3 from
1742 China
42 
3
3, with9
, 
9
regard to green tea export, it is facing competition from Kenya and from other
70,7/94700390,05479981,.3.42509943174203,,3/17424907
African3.4:397083
17., countries 30547
17.,3.4:39708 in 054793%90,80.,:
exporting CTC teas. Because8041,-803.041,70/42089.
of absence of large domestic
93%90,80.,:8041,-803.041,70/42089.
base and due to comparatively small range of exportable items, Sri Lanka and
-,80,3//:094.425,7,9;082,7,304105479,-09028$7,3,,3/
Kenya have an edge over India to offload their teas in any international markets.
03,,;0,30/04;073/,944114,/90790,83,339073,943,2,7098
This is one of the reasons of higher volume of export by Sri Lanka and Kenya
%88430419070,84384107;4:204105479-$7,3,,3/03,
compared
.425 to India. Another
.425,70/943/,349 important
,70/943/,3490725479 point is that, U.K has substantial
0725479,39543989,9&,88:-89,3 interest 9
,39543989,9&,88:-89,39,390708
9,3907089
in tea cultivation in Kenya. Most of the sterling companies, after Indianisation
390,.:9;,943303,489419089073.425,308,19073/,38,943
due0 94
/:
/:0 to  2
94 implementation
25
502
0203
039,9
9,94
43 of  
3 41
41 FERA
# Act 9 89
# .
.9 started
89,79
,790/ tea, .:
0/ 90,
90 cultivation
.:9
9;
;,9
,94
43 in  0
3 3
3 Kenya.
03
3, So,4
, $ it
4 9
makes business sense for U.K. to buy tea from Kenya and Kenya became the
2,08-:8308880380147&94-:90,174203,,3/03,-0.,2090
largest supplier of tea to U.K
,70898:55074190,94&














20





CHARACTERISTICS OF THE INDIA TEA INDUSTRY:
#%#$%$%%&$%#


1) !74/:.9;9,3/6:,9
 Productivity and quality: %0,79415:.31309:30/4;0790,89
The art of plucking, fine-tuned over the last  200

years,
 0,78 7requires
06:708 9two
4 1fresh
708  leaves
0,;08 ,and
3/ ,a  bud
- :/ 9to4
be
-0 plucked
-0 5:.
5:.00/
/ 2 manually.
,3
,3:,:,
 Tea, productivity
 %0
%0, 57
574/
4/:.:.99;
;9 can3 -0
9 .,
.,3 be  2
-0 measured
0,
0,8:8:70 70/ as  per
/ ,8
,8 507
507 :3unit9 41
:39 of  ,-
41 labor
,-47
47
(man year) and per unit of land (hectare). Mechanized plucking (when labor is
2,30,7,3/507:3941,3/0.9,700.,30/5:.303,-478
in 8479
short79 8:5
384
3 supply
8:55 5 or  05
 47
47 expensive)
0503038;
8;0 enhances
003
03,3.,3.0808 productivity,
574
574/:.
/:.9;
9;9  but
9 -:
-:99 with
9
9 compromise
 .42
.425742574280 on
80 43
quality,
6:,9
6:, 9 as .4
 ,8 coarse
.4,78
,780 leaves
0 0,;
0,;08 also4 09
08 ,8
,84 get9 plucked.
0 5:
5:.0/
.0/ When
  03 tea, 8
03 90,
90 is  3
8 in 8479
short
8 supply,
479 8:55
8: 55 some0
 842
8420
producers
574
574/:
/:.07
.078 increase
8 3
3.70
.70,8 0 productivity
,80 57
574/
4/:. :.9;
9;9  by
9 - allowing
- ,
,4
43 plucking
3 5:.
5 :. 3 of  .4
3 41
41 coarse
.4,78
,780 leaves
0 0,;
0 ,;08 08 with

9
9
fresh ones. When premium for quality rises, producers improve the quality by
17084308035702:21476:,97808574/:.0782574;0906:,9-
compromising
.4257428
.425 on productivity.
7428343574/:.
343574/:.9;9 The productivity
9;9%0
%0574 574/:.9; also depends
/:.9;9,84/0503
9,84/0503/843 on 90,
/84390 the ,04190,
age of tea
04190,
bushes,
-:8
-:8008 genetic
8  0309
0309. material,
. 2 ,9
,907
07,, irrigation,
 7
77
7
,9
,9443 fertilizer,
3 10
1079
79

07
07 cultivation
 .:9
.: 9;
;,9
,94
43 techniques,
3 90.
90 .3
36:
6:08 08 etc..
 09.
09
Replantation (typically 
#05,39,94395., 2%41.7455,94705,.
of crop pa) to replace04/-:8088/43094
41.7455,94705,.04/-:8 old bushes is done to 2574;0
improve
088/430942574;0
productivity.
574/:.9;9

2) ,
Labor
,-4-47 intensity:
7 39
39038 9 %
0389 This
8 industry
8 3/:897 97 is  ;
 8
8 very
07 labor
-477 intensive.
,-4 39038;
38;00 Labor
,-47 cost89 8
47 .4
.48 is 
8
generally fixed and therefore lower production would result in higher unit cost
0307,10/,3/90701470407574/:.9434:/708:9307:39.489
4of1 production.
574/:.943 The
% 0 proportion
5745 47943 of1
4 variable
; ,7,-0 0elements
020398
in ,-47
3,-
3 labor cost 9 /0
47.48
.489 depends
/0503/
503/8 on ,-47
8 43 labor
43,- legislation
47 0
08
8,9
,943 and  09
43,3/
,3/ extent
09039 of  .,8:
039 41
41 casual,,3/
.,8:, and  902
,3/ temporary
902547547,7
,7
workers employed. If the production suffers on account of bad weather or pests,
4707802540/190574/:.9438:1107843,..4:3941-,/0,9074750898
9the
0 per
507 unit
:39 .cost
489 of1
4 production
574/:.943 goes
 408 up
:5_ 8significantly
31.,39 


3) Long gestation: %0,-:8082,9:70147.42207.,0549,9433
43089,943 Tea bushes mature for commercial exploitation in  5-7 years
0,78
and/ remain
,3
,3/ 702 ,3 productive
702,3 57
574/
4/:.
:.9;
9;0 for7 ,3
0 14
147 an ,;
average
,;07
07, 0 50 9to4 
,0 60 years.
0
0,78
,78 Major
 ,
,4 7 part
47 5,79 of  .,5
5,79 41
41 capital
.,59
9,
,
expenditure is to be incurred in first five years, which then yields return over the
0503/9:70894-03.:770/317891;00,78.9030/8709:734;0790
next 100 years.
3090,78






21




4) 4224/
 Commodity
422 4/9 nature:
9 3,9
3,9:7:70 Tea, prices
0 %0
%0, 57
7.0 fluctuate
.088 1
1:.
:.9:9:,9
,90
0  widely
/0
/0 with9 /0
 
9 demand
/02 2,3/ supply
,3/ 8:55
8: 55
imbalances. The commodity is perishable and demand is relatively inelastic to
2-,,3.08%0.4224/985078,-0,3//02,3/870,9;030,89.94
price. While demand has a secular growth rate, supply can vary depending on
57.00/02,3/,8,80.:,77497,908:55.,3;,7/0503/343
.climatic
2,,9. .conditions
2 43/9438 3 in  9the
3 0 2 major
,47 9tea
0,  growing
743 .countries.
4:39708 & Unlike
30
0 4 other
907
commodities, tea price cycles have no linkage with the general economic cycles,
.4224/90890,57.0..08,;0343,09900307,0.4342...08
but with agro-climatic conditions. 
-:99,74.2,9..43/9438

5)  Inconvenient
 3.4
.43;3;03
030 039 but9 
39 -:
-:9 healthy
0,
0,99 drink:
 / 73
73 Tea, 8
 %0
%0, is  ,
8 a ; very
07 inconvenient
07 3.4
3 .43;3;030303
039 drink
9 /73
/7 3 to
 94
brew.
-70
-70 The
 %0 tendency
0 90
903/
3/03 03. to  14
. 94
94 form
1472 a .7
72 , creamy
.70,
0,2 layer
2 ,
,07 of  .,
07 41
41 caffeine
.,11110
030 -tannin
30 9,3
9,3333
3 ,/adds
,//8 to  90
/8 94
94 the0
9
inconvenience.
3.4
3 .43;3;03
030
03.3.0
0 %Tea
0, besides
0, -0
-088/
/08 having
08 ,
,; 3 properties
;3 57
5745
4507 079
908 of  1,
08 41
41 fatigue
1,9
9:
:0 amelioration
0 ,2
,20 04
47,
7,9
943 has 
43 ,8
,8
chemicals,
.
.02 02..,
,8 which
8 
.. help5 3
 0
05 in  2
3 maintaining
,
,39
39,
,333
3 cholesterol
 .4
. 408
0890
907474 levels
 0;0
0;08 and/ 3
8 ,3/
,3 in  preventing
3 570;
570;03 039
93
3
cancer. However, research work on the subject is not conclusive. 
.,3.0740;077080,7.4743908:-0.98349.43.:8;0

6) 7
Organized
7,3
,30/ industry:
0/ 3/
3/:89 7 %
:897 Tea
0, industry
3/:89
:897 is  ,3
7 8
8 an  47
,3 organized
47 ,3
,3
0/ agro
0/ ,
,7474 industry.
3/:89
:897
7 %This
8
8
implies that labor laws exist and since the dominant mode of tea trade is through
25089,9,-47,8089,3/83.090/423,3924/04190,97,/08974:
auctions, a large number of small producers get fair prices.
,:.9438,,703:2-074182,574/:.078091,757.08

7) 42
 Domestic
42089. Competition:
089. 425
42509943 The0 2
09943 %
%0 major
,4
,47 share
7 8
8,7
,70 of 90,
0 41 tea, 2
90 market
,7
,709 is  /4
09 8
8 dominated
/42
23,
3,90
90/ by
/ -
unorganized players. There are about 1000 of tea brands in India, of which 
:347,30/5,078%070,70,-4:94190,-7,3/833/,41. 90%

of the brands are represented by regional players while the balance of the 10%
4190-7,3/8,707057080390/-7043,5,078090-,,3.04190
is dominated by Tata Tea, Hul, Wag Bakri Chai, Godrej, Sapat International and
8/423,90/-%,9,%0,:,,7,4/70$,5,939073,943,,3/
others.
49078
49 078 With9
 9
9 the0 7
90 growing
74
43 shift
38
819 from  448
19 1742
1742 loose0 94-7,3/
4480 to branded
94-7,3/0/90,tea, 7043,
regional
0/90,70 43, players
5,
5,07
078 are
8,70
,70
now expanding their reach and also getting premium with their offerings.
3405,3/390770,.,3/,8409935702:299074110738

Special Features of India Tea Industry:


$50.,0,9:708413/,%0,3/:897
[]
 Production
!74/:.943 /dependent
0503/039 4of1 ,agro-climatic
74.2,9. .conditions
43/9438

[]
 Same
$,20 plant
$,20 5,39 and  8,2
5,39 ,3/
,3/ same0,7457,
agro-practices
8,20,74 57,.9
.9.08 give0;,
.08 ;
;0 variations
;,7,
7,943 in quality93/1107039
943836:, in different
836:,93/11 07039

regions
70438

[]
 Product
!74/:.9 Life
10 is8 1for
47 limited
290/ period
5074/

[]
 Labor
,
,-47 intensive
-473
39038
9038;
;0
0

[|
 High


Cost

 48
489 due094
9/:
/:0 to 
94high
 input
3
35:
5:9 cost89
9.4
.489 

[]
 No priority
45
457479 for $.0391.48
7479147 Scientific
147$.039 Cost 9,3,02
1.489,Management
3,02039
039
[|] :
 Huge0574547943
proportion
:05745 old 90,4!74
479434/ tea & Low
4/90, Productivity
4!74/:.9;
/:.9;9
9
22




SWOT ANALYSIS OF TEA INDUSTRY OF INDIA: 
$%$$%&$%#

Strength: 
$97039
(| Demand
02
02,3
,3/ for7 9tea
/ 14
147 0, has
0,  ,8 been
,8 -003
03 growing
74
74 3 at  8some
3 ,9
,9 42 2% per
4200  507 annum
07 ,33:
,33:2 and/ 84:
2 ,3/
,3 should
8 4:/
/
accelerate further
,..007,901:7907
[] %0.
Technical
%0.3
3.
., & 
,  Manpower
,354
,354007 Skill:
7 $
$
 Due0 94
 :
:0 to  ,
94 a :
huge
:0 population
54
545:
5:,
,9 43 base
943 -,80 in  India
,80 3
3 3/
3/,
,
Technical &
%0.3.,
Manpower Skill is available in abundant.
,35407$8,;,,-03,-:3/,39
[] 44/#080,7.$:554
Good Research Support79-90,74078,8053/:897741:7907
by tea growers has will help industry grow 1:7907
44/#080,7.$:55479-90,74078,8053/:89774 further.

Weaknesses:
0,308808
|| ,
Labor intensive
,-4739038
-4739038;03/:8industry: The second generation
;03/:897%080.43/030
97%080.43/0307,9 labors ,70
7,943,-478 are 70:.
43,-478,70 reluctant to join
70:.9,399443
9,399443
this industry
983/:897
hence it could pose a problem of skilled labour in the near future.
03.09.4:/5480,574-024180/,-4:739030,71:9:70
[| No
4 Effective
4 110
1 10.9
.9; Cost89 ,
;0 4
489 Management
,3,
3,02
02039 system
039 8
889
8902 adopted
02 ,/
,/45
4590 / by
90/ - companies
- .42
.425,
5,3
308 and/ 4907
08 ,3
,3/ other
4907
regulatory
70:,947
bodies.
-4/08
[] $:5517422470011.0395,078003
Supply from more efficient players like Kenya,,3,$7,3,
China, Sri lanka
 $:5517422470011.0395,078003,3,$7,3,
[] 0.
Declining
0.33 Export79413/,
3354 of India
547941 over the
3/,4;079 years.
4;07900,
00,78
78

Opportunities:
55479:3908

[| 
 Export Potential
5479 ! 49039, if1 India
3/, .can
,3 increase
3.70,80 its98 5
production
74/ :.943 .capacity
,5,.9 

[| %
 To4 make
2 ,0 9tea
0, more
2 470 ,acceptable
..059,-0 ,and
3/ 1fashionable
,843,-0 like
0 .coffee
41100 

[] %4
 To .42
come
.4 up  with
20 :5
:5 
9 new
9 30 flavors/formulation
0 1
1,;
,;47
478
814
1472
72:
:,9
,94
43 of  90
3 41
41 the0 90,
9 tea,, 90,
90 tea, 4
90 houses
4:8
:808 etc. 94
08 09.
09 to 
94

popularize
545:
54 5:,7
,70 the  .43
090
90 concept
.43.05
.0594of190,3
9419tea in 3/
India.
0,33 /,
,
[| ,
Large
70 untapped
,70 :3
:39,55 rural  2
9,550/7:7,
0/7:7, market
,70
,709 for  -7,
9147
147 branded
-7,3/0
3/0/ tea  .4
/90,
90, companies
.425
25,30 lile :
,3080 Hul ,3/
80: and  %,
,3/ Tata9,
%,9,
Tea
%0,






23 





Threats:
%70,98
[] 4
Global competition
4-,.42
-,.425099
509943
43
[| 448938420.4:39708
Low Cost in some countries 03,$7,3,,3/03,
like China, Sri Lanka and Kenya.
448938420.4:3970803,$7,3,,3/03,
[] Import
25 of Tea
2547941% from 4907.4:39
47941%0,1742 other .4:39708
0,17424907 countries.
708
[| 48908.,,94343,..4:39413
Cost escalation on account of increase in the cost of production
48908.,,94343,..4:39413.70,80390.48941574/:.943
.70,80390.48941574/:.943



PRESENT MARKET SCENARIO OF INDIAN TEA INDUSTRY:
!#$%#%$#%&$%#
The0 90
%
%0 tea, 3/:
90, industry
3/:89
897 occupies
7 4..:
4..:5
508 a place
08 , 5,
5,.0 of  .4
.0 41
41 considerable
.438
38/
/07
07,-
,-0 importance
0 2
254
5479,
79,3.
3.0 in  the
0 3
3 90 Indian
90 3/
3/,3
,3
economy, producing a fourth of the world’s annual tea output among them some
0.4342574/:.3,14:79419047/8,33:,90,4:95:9,2439028420
gardens producing high quality teas - and employing around 1.26
,7/038574/:.36:,990,8,3/02543,74:3/ million people
24350450

at 90,
,9 tea  plantations
90, 5,39
5,39,9,9438 and/ 
438 ,3
,3/ 10 2
million
24 3 persons
43 50784
5078438 derive
38 /07
/07;
;0 their
0 907
9 livelihood
07 ;
;0
044
44/ from2 90,
/ 174
1742 tea.  3
90, In
Northeast
479
4790 ,89 India
0,89 3/
3/, alone,
, ,
,430
430 the0 90,
 9
90 tea  3
90, industry
3/:
/:89
897 employs
7 02
025
548 around
48 ,7
,74:
4:3/3/ 900,000persons
5
50784
078438 on
38 43
permanent rolls.
5072,3039748
With domestic demand at an estimated825
9/42089./02,3/,9,30892,90/ million kg (MKg) as of 
243,841 2009, India
3/,
is one of the largest consumers of tea globally. However, as domestic demand
84304190,7089.438:20784190,4-,40;07,8/42089./02,3/
accounts
,..4
,..4:39
:398 for  4;0
8 147
147 over86%
4;07 of  9
7 41
41 the0 .4
90 country’s
.4:3
:397
97
8 tea, 4:
8 90
90, output
4:95
95: and/ 8since
:9 ,3/
,3 3.0 tea, 2
3.0 90,
90 imports
254
5479 are0
7988 ,7
,70
permitted only for re-export, India’s share of the global tea trade is on the lower
5072990/4314770054793/,88,7041904-,90,97,/084390407
side.
8/0
8/0 Nevertheless,
0;07
0;079
90
008
088 exports
8 054
05479 have
7988 ,
,; a .7
;0 , critical
.79
9. , role
., 740 to  play
740 94
94 5, in  2
5, 3
3 maintaining
,39
,39,
,3
33 the0
3 90
9
demand-supply
/02
/02,3/
,3/8:
8:55 balance
55 -,
-,,3.
,3.0 in  90
0 3
3 the  /42
90 domestic
/42089
089. market.
. 2,7
2,70
09 Although
9 
94: tea
94: 90, is produced
90, 8 574/:
574/:.0/ in
.0/ 3
14States
$9,9
$9,908 in  3
08 3
3 India,
3/
/, five0 41
, 1;
1;0 of  9
41 them?Assam
902
02
88
88,2 and  0
,2 ,3/
,3/ West89 0
089 Bengal
03
3, in  North
, 3
3 4
479
79 India,
 3/
3/, and 
, ,3/
,3/
Tamil
%,2
%,  Nadu,
2 ,
,/: Kerala
/: 0
07,
7,, and/ ,
, ,3
,3/ Karnataka
,73
73,9
,9,
,, in  $4
, 3
3 South
$4:9
:9 India
 3/
3/, account
, ,.
,..4
.4:39 for  4;
:39 147
147 over
4;07 98% 41
07  of 
41
India’s tea production. Within that, North India alone accounts for around75%
3/,890,574/:.943939,94793/,,430,..4:398147,74:3/

of 3/,
41 India’s
3/,8 total, 90,
8 949
949, tea  production,
90, 574
574/:.
/:.94
943 of which85-90%
3 41 
. is  .438
. 8
8 consumed
.438:20
:20/ in 90
/ 3 the  /42
390 domestic
/42089.
089.
market. The balance, much of it of high quality, is exported. Tea is among the
2,709%0-,,3.02:.419416:,98054790/%0,8,24390
most labor-intensive of all plantation crops. On an average, around 
2489,-4739038;041,5,39,943.74583,3,;07,0,74:3/65%4190
of the
cost of production is incurred on labor.
.48941574/:.94383.:770/43,-47

24



The recent buoyancy in tea prices, which started from 
%070.039-:4,3.390,57.08.89,790/1742 2006, has come as a relief
,8.420,8,7001
for  bulk
147
147 -: tea players,
-:90,5,0 who have had to .450
90,5,0784,;0,/94 cope  
784,;0,/94.450 with9/057088
depressed
9/057 prices8147,2
0880/57.0
0/57.08 for almost a
147,2489,
489,
decade since 1999.
/0.,/083.0 Tea prices,8,190770,.3,50,
%0,57.0 after reaching
%0,57.08,190770,. a peak 3
in 1998,
3,50,3 went into a steady
039394,890,/

decline
/0.
0.30 thereafter,
30 907
9070,
0,19
1907  with
07 9
9 ,;average
,;07
07,
,0 domestic.
0 / 42
4208 089 prices
9.. 57.0
7 dwindling
.088 /
/3
3/ 3 from
/3 1742
742 ,7around
,74:
4:3/
3/
Rs.76.43
#8 per kg in 1998
5073 9to4 ,
94 a 4
low 41
4 of  ,7
41 around
,74:
4:3/
3/ #8Rs. 
#8 58.05
 per
507 kg 3
07  in  
3 2005(Refer
#0107
Chart

,79 for  97
,79 147
147 trend
9703/ in  90,
03/3
3 tea prices
90,57
57.08 over07 90
.08 4;
4;07 the  5074/
90 period
5074/1998-2008). Although
 
9
94:
4: global
 4-,
4-, tea
 90,
prices
57.081999 onwards, driven primarily by oversupply, the decline in average
43,7/8/7;03572,7-4;078:5590/0.303,;07,0

prices
57.0
57 8 was
.08 ,8 sharper
,8 8
8,75
,7507 and/ 41
07 ,3
,3/ of ,
a 4
longer
43
307 duration
07 /:
/:7,9
7,943 for  3/
43 147
147 Indian
3/,3 teas  ;8
,3 90,8
90,8 vis-a-vis
;8;
;8 the0 90,8
8 90
9 teas 
90,8
from Kenya and Sri Lanka, India’s two main rivals in the exports market. This
174203,,3/$7,3,3/,8942,37;,83900547982,709%8
was on account of a number of factors: lack of marketing initiative by the Indian
,843,..4:3941,3:2-07411,.9478,.412,709339,9;0-903/,3
players
5,0
5 78 to
,078 94 look  147
9444
44 for  05
147 export
05479 markets
479 2,
2,70
7098 beyond
98-0
-043/ the0CIS1
43/ 90
9 $ countries;
$.4
.4:39
:39708
708 proliferation
 574
5741
107,9
07,943 of
43 41
small growers and bought-out leaf factories (which led to a decline quality of
82,74078,3/-4:94:90,11,.94708.0/94,/0.306:,941
tea produced), and failure to check spurious varieties of tea from being traded as
90,574/:.0/,3/1,:7094.0.85:74:8;,709084190,1742-0397,/0/,8
premium
570
5702
2:2 tea .
:2 90, (which
90, affected
. ,110
,110.90/ the  2,
.90/ 90
90 image0 41
2,0 of 3/
Indian
3/,3 teas  3
,3 90,8
90,8 in  90
3 the0 054
9 export79 2,7
05479 market);
2,70
09
9
higher cost of
07.48941
production
574/:
57 4/:.9
.94341 of 90,
434190, tea  3
in 3/,,8.425,
33India (as compared
/,,8.425,70/ with9 9,9
70/ 
9 that,93
9 in  $7
3 Sri  ,3
$7 Lanka
,3, and  0
, ,3/
,3/ Kenya)
03, on
3, 43
account
,.
,..4
.4:3:39 of  9
9 41
41 the0 
90 higher

0
077 8social
4.
4.,, costs
 .48
.4 898 here;
98 0
070
70 and/ 08
 ,3/
,3 existence
0 890
903.
3.0 of  .07
0 41
41 certain
.079, 9,3 non-tariff
3 34
34339,
9,7
711
11
barriers
-,77
-, 77078 like0 708
078 
0 residual-pesticide
708//:,
:,5085089.9./0 (intea)
/0 3
390, specifications
90, 850.
850.1
1.,9
.,9438 imposed
438 2
2548
5480/0/ by
- ,a 3:2
number
3:2-07 of
-07 41
importing
254
2 5479
793
3 .4countries.
.4:39:397708
08 All  9
 
 these
908080 factors
0 1,
1,.94
.9478 led/ 94
78 0
0/ to  90
94 the0 488
9 lossof
4 8841 key
41  0 export
0 0
054 5479 markets,
79 2 ,7
,709098
8
which
.
 in  tum
. 3
3 9:7
9:733 3increased
3.70
.70,8 ,80/
0/ 8:supplies
8:55550
08 in  9
8 3
3 the0 /42
90 domestic
/4208 089. market,
9. 2 ,7
,709
09 thereby
 9070
9 070-- bringinga
-73
-733,
3,
downward
/43,7/57088
/43 pressure
,7/57088:704357.08 on prices. %8,5,7990,57.08,84.,2094-0,110.90/-
This apart, tea prices ,84.,2094-0,110.90/-
:704357.08%8,5,7990,57.08 also came to be affected by
the0 6:
90
9 qualityfactor,
6:,
,991,
1,.9 .947
47 which

. came
. .,
.,20 into
20 3 94 play
394 5
5, during
, /:
/:7 73 the0 0,7
3 90
9 early
 part
0,7 5,
5,79 of  90
79 41
41 the0 .:
9 current
.:77
7703
0399
decade when the delay of re-plantation activities in the latter half of the 1990s
/0.,/00390/0,41705,39,943,.9;908390,9907,14190 8
began
-0
-0,3 to  90
,3 94
94 tell 43
90 on  6:
43 quality
6:,
,9 and/ 03.
9 ,3
,3/ hence
0 3.0 on  prices.
0 43
43 57
57.0
.08 Most89 players
8 4
489 5,
5,078 had/ /0
078 ,
,/ deferred
/01010770
770/ re-
/ 70
70
plantation during the latter half of the 1990s
5,39,943/:7390,9907,14190 to cash in on the buoyancy in tea
894.,834390-:4,3.390,
prices during 1997-98,
57.08/:73 but when the sharp price decline happened subsequently,
-:903908,7557.0/0.30,55030/8:-806:039
their
90
9 07 financial
7 13
13,3,3. , position
., 548
5489 943
43 4got 9 84
49 so  0
84 weakened
0, ,03030/ that,9 90
0/ 9,9
9 they
9 0 were
0
070
70 :3unable
:3,-
,-0 to  2,
0 94
94 make0 90
2,0 the0
9
required
706:
706 :70/ investments
70/ 3;
3;0892
0892039 0398 in  9
8 3
3 their
907 tea  08
07 90,
90, estates.
089,90
9,908 Increasing
8 3.70
3 .70,83,83 domestic
 /42
/42089089. consumption,
. .438
.438:25 :25943943
and exports to an extent, behind current buoyancy in 
,3/05479894,309039-03/.:77039-:4,3.3
Prices
!7.08




25 




INDIA Vs OTHER TOP TEA PRODUCING COUNTRIES:
'8%#%!%!#&&%#$

Major tea exporting countries of the world are Kenya, Sri Lanka, China, India
,4790,054793.4:39708419047/,7003,$7,3,3,3/,
and Indonesia. However, prior to evaluation of export performance of major tea
,3/3/4308,40;075747940;,:,94341054795071472,3.0412,4790,
exporting countries of the world, it is necessary to analyze the production and
054793.4:39708419047/9830.088,794,3,090574/:.943,3/
domestic demand of tea in these countries. On the production front India is the
/42089./02,3/4190,39080.4:39708390574/:.943174393/,890
second major producer of the tea in the world .Other countries include China,
80.43/2,47574/:.07419090,39047/907.4:397083.:/03,
Sri Lanka, Kenya and Indonesia. During 1951-60,
$7,3,03,,3/3/4308,:73 India around 
3/,,74:3/ 40507.03941
percent of
world  574/
47/
47/ production,
574/:.943
:.943 declined
 /0.
/0.30/ to 
30/94
94 26 507.0393
per cent in 2008.The declining trend can be
%0/0.339703/.,3-0
observed
4-
4-8
807
07;0
;0/ in  .,
/ 3
3 case
.,80 of  $7
80 41
41 Sn  
$7 Lanka
,3
,3, as  0
, ,8
,8 well.
0 Only
  3 China
3 
3
3, and/ 0
, ,3/
,3 Kenya
03
3, are0 ,-0
, ,7
,70 able0 94
,- to 
94
increase their share in world production considerably. The share of China and
3.70,809078,70347/574/:.943.438/07,-%08,70413,,3/

Kenya
 03, /during
03 :7 3 1951-60
73  was13.59
,8 per507 .cent
039 ,and 2.67
3/  per
50
507 cent 9 respectively,
7 .03
.039 708
70850
50.9
.9;
;0
0
increased to 
3.70,80/94 31507.039,3/
per cent and 
9 507.0393
per cent in  2008.Inrecent years China emerged as
370.0390,783,02070/,8
major
2 ,4
,47 tea  producer
7 90,
90, 574/
574/:.
:.07 in  9
07 3
3 the0 4
90 world.
47
7/ Fig-1 8
/ 
 shows,
84
48 during
8 /:7
/:73
3 2004
  and2005,
 ,3
,3/ China
/  3
3,
,
became
-0
-0.,2
.,20 number
03:2
3:2-07 one  90,
-07 430
430 tea  producer
90, 574
574/: in 9
/:.073
.073 the0 47
90 world/ pushing
47/ 5:8
5:8
3 India
33
3/
/, into43:2
,39
394 number
3:2-07 two
-07 94
position.
548943
548 India,,//4:-90/3,8020703.0,8,945
943 3/ had doubted China’s
3/,,//4:-90/3 emergence as a top 7,3574/:
raking
,8020703.0,8,9457, producer,
3574/:.07 citing
.07.93
.93
limitations
2
29,
9,94
9438 infield
38 31
310
0/ level0 89,
/ 0;
0;0 statistics
89,98
989.
9.8 and/ under
8 ,3
,3/ :3/
:3/07 reporting
07 705
705479
4793 of 90
3 41 the  90,
4190 tea  production
90, 574
574/:
/:.9
.943 in
43 3
India. Tea board of India was then engaged in revising the production.
3/,%0,-4,7/413/,,890303,0/370;8390574/:.943
Since 1985,
$3.0 even though China’s area under tea cultivation is lower than earlier
0;0394:3,8,70,:3/0790,.:9;,94384079,30,707

period due to improvement in yield, production increased by 


5074//:0942574;0203930/574/:.9433.70,80/- 3.28 per cent per
507.039507
annum during 1984-94,
,33:2/:73 by 
- 4.13 per cent per annum during 1995-05.In
507.039507,33:2/:73 India
33/,

production
574/:.9
574/:.943 increased
43 3.70,80/ by
3.70,80/ - 1.83
-
 percent per annum and 1.07 per cent per annum
507.039507,33:2,3/507.039507,33:2

respectively during the same period. In Kenya, production increased by 5.53


70850.9;0/:73908,205074/303,574/:.9433.70,80/- per
507
cent 9 per
.03
.039 507 annum
507 ,3
,33:2 and/ 
3:2 ,3
,3/ 3.12
 per
50
507 cent
7 .0 39 per
.039 507 annum
07 ,33:
,3 2 respectively
3:2 70
7085
850.
0.9
9;
;0 during
0 /:
/:7
73 the0 8,20
3 90
9 same
8,20
period.
5074/




26




Production
!74
!74/:.
/:.94
943 in $7
33 Sri  ,
3$7 Lanka
,3, and  3/
3, ,3/
,3/ Indonesia
3/430
4308, also4 3.
8, ,8
,84 increased
3.70,
70,80/ during
80/ /:7 this period
/:7398
39850
5074
74/ with
/ 9
9
improvement in supply conditions in Kenya, China and Indonesia, India’s share
2574;0203938:55.43/9438303,3,,3/3/4308,3/,88,70

42 SHES
D ERD OH1 a
089.
. .43
.438:2
8:259
5943
43 88 ., EP BF AR ERTL BD ORBSH OH
347/574/:.943/0.30/0;0394:98949,574/:.9433.70,80/
42089 .,.:
.:,90/
,90/ - /0/:
/0/:.9
.93
3 05
05479
479 174
1742 BPSSetion. In
2 574
574/:
/:.94
.943
3 3
case of India, there
.,80413/,9070
is  .439
8
8 continuous
.4 393
3:4
:4:8 increase
:8 3
3.7
.70,
0,80 in  8share
80 3
3 ,
,70 of  /4
70 41
41 domestic
/42208
089
9. consumption
. .438
.438:2
:255943 in  574/
943 3
3 production,
574/:.
:.9
943
43 it 
 9
9
increased from 
3.70,80/1742 32.06

per cent during 1951-60
507.039/:73 94 to 66.92 per cent in 1981-90,
507.0393 further increased to78.26
1:79073.70,80/94 
per cent in
507.0393
2001-04.
 We can observe that, whatever additional production is taking place, it
0.,34-807;09,9,90;07,//943,574/:.94389,35,.09
is almost
8,2489
entirely
03
039
970
70 consumed
 .4
.438
38:2
:20/ internally
0/ 39
3907
073,
3,
 leaving
 0,
0,;
;3 export
3 054
0 79 8surplus
5479 :75: to  702
:75:88 94
94 remain
702,
,3 stagnant
3 89,
89,3,
3,39 and/
39 ,3
,3/

sometimes
842
842092
09208 export
08 0
05479 even3 84
5479 0;0
0;03 shows
848 declining
8 /0.
/0.3 3 trend.
33 9703
9703/ In  .43
/ 3
3 contrast,
.4397,8
97,89 Kenya’s
9 0
03
3,8 domestic
,8 /42
/42089
089.
.
consumption share in production is very low and declined over a period of time
.438:259438,703574/:.9438;074,3//0.30/4;07,5074/41920
shows that except for a few years, the increase inproduction of tea in Kenya is
8489,90.059147,100,78903.70,803574/:.9434190,303,8
almost
,
,24
2489 entirely
89 03
039970 used
70 :80/ for7 0
0/ 14
147 export.
054
5479  In3 $
79 Sri7 Lanka,
7 ,3
,3, domestic
, /42
4208
0899. consumption
. .438
.438:2
:255943 in 
943 3
3
production
574/:.943 is8 very
;07 low
4 ,and
3 / is8 declining.
/0.33 In3 2001-04,

around 
,74:3/ 94  per
507 cent 941
507 .03 of 90,
.03941 tea  production
90, 574
574/:
/:.94 in $7,3,8:80/
.9433 Sri Lanka
33$7, is used  147
3,8:80/ for  05
147 export.
05479
479 In recent39
370.0
370.039
years, tea export and production are almost same in Sri Lanka .In china, share of
0,7890,05479,3/574/:.943,70,24898,203$7,3,3.3,8,7041
export in production of tea increased over a period of time. From Fig .1 one can
054793574/:.9434190,3.70,80/4;07,5074/41920742430.,3
observe
4-8
4-807;
07;0 that,9 3
0 9
9,9 in 
China,
3 , production,
3, 574
574/:.
/:.943
943 export
 0
05479 and  .4
5479 ,3/
,3/ consumption
.438:
38:259
25943 shown
43 843
8 increasing
43 3.7
3.70,8
0,83
3
trend.
9703
9703/ In  3/4
/ 3
3 Indonesia,
3/4308
308,  8share
, ,7
,70 of  .438
0 41
41 consumption
.438:2
:259
5943 in  production
43 3
3 574/
574/:.
:.9
943 increased,
43 3.70
3.70,8
,80/  but
0/ -:
-:9 it  8
9 9
9 1s
lower than India.
4079,33/,








27





Reasons for decline in exports:
#0,8438147/0.303054798

1),41$4;09&3432,397,/35,79307413/,%0,054798,;0.420
Fall of Soviet Union, main trading partner of India. Tea exports have come
down by70 percent
/43- from 
507.0391742 44 33
Mn/Kg in  2000 to 12.5
94 Mn/Kg in 
33 2003.

2) 
 Exports
547
54798 to  97,
98 94
94 trading
97,/3
/3 ally  7
 ,
, Iraq,
7,6 Iran
,6 7
7,3 and  1
,3 ,3/
,3/ Afghanistan
1,,38
389,3 was  ,110
9,3 ,8
,8 affected
,110.90
.90/ during
/ /:
/:73 the
73 90
same0 period
8,20
8,2 507
50744/ due0 94
/ /:
/:0 to  90
tension
9038
3843 and/ 
43 ,3
,3/ war,7 3
in  2
3 middle-east.
2////0
00,8
0,89 Exports
9 
547
54798 came
98 .,
.,20 down
20 /4
/433 by
-
roughly70 percent between 
74:507.039-09003 2000
,3/and 
2003.

3) "
 Quality
":,
:,
9 has8 ,
9 ,8
, always
,,,88 been
-0
-003 the0 biggest
03 9
90 -

08
089 consideration
9 .4
.438
38/
/0707,9
,94
43 in  90,
3 3
3 tea, 054
90 exports.
0 5479
798 Other
8 9
90
077
emerging countries  0$7,3,,3/03,,708.473/:09424/073
02073.4:39708 like Sri Lanka and Kenya are scoring high due to modern
methods
2094/841
209 of production
4/841574/: and branding.  070,83/,8
574/:.943,3/-7,3/3
.943,3/-7,3/3 Whereas,
07 India is 43.4393:4:8855,0
on continuous
0,83/,843.4393:4 slippage
:8855,0
in terms of quality and branding thereby giving share of exports. 
390728416:,9,3/-7,3/39070-;38,7041054798
4) 43.0734;076:,9,8708:90/3054798412,738;,:0,//0/90,
 Concern over quality has resulted in exports of high margins value added tea
(Tea Bags and  7,3/0/%0,.420/431742
%0,,8,3/ Branded Tea) come down from  45 507.03941949,90,0547983
percent of total tea exports in
1999
 9to4 
33  percent
507
07.0
.03 in  
39 3
3 2003
 ;(value
;,
,:0 terms).
:0 907
90728
28 In  ;4
 3
3 volume
;4:
:20 terms,
20 9072
90 came
7288 .,
.,20 down
20 /4
/43
3
from86.8
1742 Mn/Kg in 1999
33 to 
94 39.833
Mn/Kg in  2003.

Global tea industry has witnessed a paradigm shift with emergence of stronger
4-,90,3/:897,8930880/,5,7,/28199020703.0418974307
countries
.4:
.4:39
39708 like0 $7
708 
0 Sri  ,
$7 Lanka
,3, and/ 03
3, ,3
,3/ Kenya.
03, These
, %
%080 countries
080 .4:
.4:397
39708 captured
08 .,5
.,59:
9:70/ large0 8,708
70/ ,7
,70 shares
8 in
,708 3
global,90,054798,990.489414/075,07803/,
4- tea exports at the cost of older players7803/,3
4-,90,054798,990.489414/075,0 like India. 31,.99080
In 1,.99080.4:39708
fact, these .4:39708
countries
are0 0,
,7
,70 eating
0,9
93 away
3 ,
,, the0 premium
, 9
90 5702
702:
:2 grade
2 7,
7,/0 tea, 05
/0 90
90, export
0 5479 market
479 2 ,7
,709 and/ ;
09 ,3/
,3 value
,: added
,:0 ,//
,//0/ tea,
0/ 90,
90
export market on platform of superior quality and aggressive branding. Impact
054792,709435,91472418:507476:,9,3/,7088;0-7,3/325,.9
on 3/,
43 India
3 is  0;
/, 8
8 evident
0;/0
/039 from  $7
39 1742
1742 Sri  
$7 Lanka’s
,3,
,3,8 tea  05
8 90,
90, exports
0547
4798 which
98 
. increased
. 3.70,
3.70,80
80/ from2 
/ 174
1742 262.9
Mn/Kg
 3 in3 1999
 9to4 
298.8Mn
3 /  
Kg in3 
2008
whereas
0
070
70,8 India’s
,8 3/
3/,8 reduced
,8 70/
70/:.
:.0/ from 
0/ 1742
1742
191.7 Mn/Kg to 196
394 Mn/Kg during the same period. Sri Lanka and Kenya are
3/:73908,205074/$7,3,,3/03,,70

able to increase their productivity at constant pace which helped it divert higher
,-0943.70,80907574/:.9;9,9.4389,395,.0.050/9/;07907
produce
574/:.0 in3 9the
0 0export
0 markets.
5479 2 ,7
709 Higher
0988  07 0exports
 5
54 were
4798  achieved
070 ,.
,.
0; by  9these
0;00/ -
- 0
080
80
economies
0.4342 as a 708:94150788903
0.434208,8, result 41507889039011479894,7/
08,8,708:9 of persistent 9011479894,7/86:,9
efforts towards 86:,9-09907203
quality -099072039,3/-7,3/
betterment 9,3/-7,3/
and brand
building.
-:/3
-:/3 This 007.80,.9:,050/0.4342
%8 exercise actually 050/0.43420894,7/8/7;
%8007.80,.9:, helped economies0894,7/8/7;32,73
towards driving high margin
32,73
value-added tea exports.
;,:0,//0/90,054798


28 



It is witnessed, Indian tea is increasingly been displaced by tea of other
98930880/3/,390,83.70,83-003/85,.0/-90,414907
Asian
 8,3 and/ 
,3 ,3
,3/ African
17
17.,3 countries.
,3 .4
.4::39
397708 Trend
08 %7
%70 indicates
03/ 3
3/ ,908 9that
/.,90 , although
,99 ,9
,94: land
4: ,3/ under
:3/
3/07
07
cultivation in India has increased at CAGR of] percent in last 
.:9;,94333/,,83.70,80/,9#41507.0393,89 3 0,780/,8
years, yield has

actually come down from 1679


,.9:,.420/431742 Kg/Hectare in 
 0.9,703 206 to 1614Kg/Hectare
94 0.9,703 in 2009.

Sn  
$7
$7 Lanka
,3 , witnessed
,3, 930
93088
880/ a .425
0/ , complete
.4250090 reversal
90 70
70;
;07
078,
8, to  India
 94
94 3/, with
3/,  9 yield
9 0/ increasing
0/ 3.7
3.70,
0,8 3 by
83 -
-
40Kg/Hectare
0
 0.9,
.9,70
70 between
-09
-09003 2006
003  ,and 2009
3/  with
  no4 increase
9 3 3.70,80 in3 land
,3/ under
:3/07
cultivation.
.:9
.: 9;
;,9
,94
43 Even
3 ;
;03 in  
03 3
3 Kenya
, yield
03, 0/ increased
0 3.7
.70, more
0,880/ 2 470 than
470 9,
9 10  5
,3 
 percent
07
07.0
.039 or  
39 47
47 242 
Kg/Hectare in the same time period. Although, Indiais regarded as uGoliath of
0.9,703908,209205074/94:3/,870,7/0/,8a4,941
tea, 3/:
90
90, industry
3/:897
897 its  position
 98
98 548
5489
94
43 is 8
3 8 slipping
85
55
53 to  82
3 94
94 smaller
82,
,07 countries
07 .4:3
.4 :397
9708 like
08 0
 Sr  
0 $7
$7 Lanka
,3
,3, and/
, ,3
,3/
Kenya on quality and productivity parameters.
03,436:,9,3/574/:.9;95,7,209078
Middle-east countries like Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan and UAE were India’s main
//00,89.4:3970807,37,61,389,3,3/&0703/,82,3
trading
97,/
97,/3
3 ally ,3
 ,
, and/ .4
,3/ contributed
.439
397
7-:
-:90
90/ 35  percent
/  507.
507.03
039 (volume-based)
9 ;4
;4:2
:20-
0-,8
,80/
0/ of  total
 41
41 949,
949, Indian
 3/
3/,3 tea,
,3 90,
90
exports. But, 
054798:9 9/11 terrorist attacks
90774789,99,
907747 and war in Afghanistan
89,99,.8,3/,731, and/7,60/948,75
.8,3/,731,389,3,3 Iraq led to sharp
389,3,3/7,60/948,75
decline in tea exports to these nations.
/0.30390,0547989490803,9438
















29



RECOMMENDATIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT 
#%$#!#'%

The01,.
%
%0 fact9 
1,.9 which
. emerges
. 0207
020708 from  90
08 1742
1742 the  present
90 570
570803
8039 crisis88
9.78
.788 is  9,
8 that93/
9,9 Indian
3/,3 tea has not  been
,3 90,,8349
90,,8349 -00
-003
3
globallycompetitive.
4
4-,
-,
.42
.4250
5099
99;0
;0 It ,8
has  .43
 9,8
9 concentrated
.43.03
.0397,
97,90/ more7043
90/ 24
2470 on -:
43 building
-:/
/3 up 98
3 :5 its  ,7
98 large0 089
,70 estates
089,908
,908
what it should do isit should given less attention to processing and improving
,9984://48984:/;03088,990394394574.0883,3/2574;3
the0 6:
90
9 quality
6:,
,9
9 by  proper
 -
- 57
5745
4507 blendingand
07 -
-03
03/
/3
3,3
,3/ marketing+for
/ 2 ,7
,709
093
3]1
]147 higher
47 
 07 price
07 57.
57.0 realization
0 70
70,
,,
,9
943 of
43 41
their products.
907574/:.98

Unlike its key competitors, India does not have any powerful brand to support
&30980.4250994783/,/408349,;0,354071:-7,3/948:55479
itspromotion
98
98574
574249
2494
43 drive0 3
3 /7;
/7;0 in 90
the  39
90 international
39073
073,94
,943, market.To
3, 2,7
2,709%
09%4 win3 back
4 
3 -,. the  .43
-,. 90
90 confidence
.431/
1/03.0 of
03.0 41
lost foreignmarkets,
4891470
489147032,7 Indian
32,70983/ tea producers
0983/,390,
,390,574/ have to identify90300/
574/:.078,;094/0391 the 300/
:.078,;094/039190 need  9470;9,
to revitalize
9470;9,0
0
the image 41
902,0 of 3/
902,041 Indiantea in that international
3/,390,39,939073,9 market.A
,390,39,939073,943,2,70 vigorous .,25,3.
43,2,709;474:8 campaign which
9;474:8.,25,3.

include
3.
3.:/
:/0 Indian
0 3/
3/,3 tea  4
,3 90,
90, logos
4 andmaking
48 ,3
,3/2
/2,
,3 Indian
3 3
3/, 3 brands
/,3 -7,3
-7,3/8 acceptable
/8 ,.
,..05
.059,
9,-
-0 in  948
0 3
3 those
9480 most
0 2 489
489
major markets.
2,472,7098

Further,
:
:79
7907 an  38
07,3
,3 inspection
3850.
50.94
943 agency
3,0
,03. should
3. 84 :/ be
84:/ -0 appointed
-0 ,554
,5543
390/ to  005,
90/ 94
94 keep
0 a 6:,
05, quality
6:,9
9 check
.0
.0. on
.43
43
the tea that is exported,
9090,9,98054 and/902,4797:8984:
9090,9,98054790/,3 the major 97:8984:/-02,/
790/,3/902,47 thrust should/-02,/0942574;06:
be made0942574;06:,9
to improve quality
,9
for the long term sustainability of tea industry of India.
147904390728:89,3,-94190,3/:897413/,


There
% 07
070 is  ,an3 urgent
0 8
8 :7
:7 39 need
039 300
00/ for7 70
/ 14
147 reducing
70/:
/:..3
3 the0 unit
 9
90 cost89 4
:39 .4
.48 of1 production
574
574/:
/:.9
.943 9through
43 74:
74:


PROPHEEY
08ih
.,3308
.,33 SAI4;3
257 in SARAH
2574;3  317, DENI:70
317,897:.9 Hen 9,
897:.9:70 iG473
SB 2,7
9,473 SAA 093
Ets UCONN
2,7093 ,.9;908NS94 3/;
574/:.9;9,38.,5,.9-:/34182,740788970,2332,7093
,.9;908 MAT fetes
3/;/:,
/:,
country’s
.4:3 demand, 5745
.4:3978/02,3/
978/02,3/ propagating
5745,,9 health benefits  41
,,930,9-030198
30,9-030198 of 90,,3/5742
tea and promotion
4190,,3/ 57424943 of 47,3.
4943 41 organic
4147 ,3.
tea using the tea mark. This is exactly what the domestic tea companies should
90,:839090,2,7%880,.9,990/42089.90,.425,30884:/
do for their long term survival 
/41479074390728:7;;,






30


















CHAPTER 3
!%#

TOP 2 PLAYERS IN INDIAN TEA INDUSTRY:
%!!#$%&$%#












31




 TATA TEA 
%%%
%%%


Company Profile
425,3!7410
Tata9, %0
%,
%,9, Tea, 
%0, Limited,
2
29
90/
0/ also
 ,
,84 known
84 3
34
43 as  %
3 ,8
,8 Tata-Tetley,
,9,
,9,%0
%09
90
0 is  90
 8
8 the0 4
9 world's
47
7/8 second
/8 80.4
80.43/ largest
3/ ,7
,7089
089
manufacturer
2,3:
2,3:1,.9:707 and /89
1,.9:707,3/
,3/ distributor
/897-:9 of 90,%,9,%0,890,7089;079
7-:94741 tea. Tata Tea 890,7089;079.,3907
474190,%,9,%0, is the largest vertically integrated
.,3907,90/
,90/
tea firm in the world, from its plantation activity through to its packaging and
90,17239047/1742985,39,943,.9;9974:94985,.,3,3/
marketing initiatives.
2,709339,9;08
Tata
% ,9, Tea
9, % 0, Limited,
0,  2
290
90/ together
/ 94
94
0907 with
09 9 its8 8:
9 98
9 subsidiaries,
8:-8
-8/
/,
,7
708  0engages
08 3
3,
,08 in  processing,
08 3
3 574
574.0
.088
883
3

producing,
574/:
574/:.3
.3 marketing,
 2 ,7
,709
093
3 and  /8
 ,3/
,3/ distributing
/897
97-:9
-:93 tea products
3 90, 574/:.98 primarily
574/:.98 572
572,7
,7 in  3/,
 3
3 India.
3 /, It  ,84
 9
9 also 
,84
involves
3;4
3;4;
;08 in  9
08 3
3 the0 .:
90 cultivation
.:9
9;
;,9
,94
43 and/ 2
3 ,3
,3/ manufacture
,3
,3:1
:1,.
,.9:
9:70 of  -,.
70 41
41 black
- tea  ,3
,. 90,
90, and/ 38
,3/ instant
389,3
9,39 tea,  90,
9 90,
90, tea,
90
buying/blending,
-:
-:3
3
-
-03
03/
/3
3 and/ 8,
 ,3/
,3 sale0 41
8,0 of  90
41 tea, 3
90, in  -:
3 bulk
-: or  ;
 47
47 value
,:
,:0 added
0 ,//
,//0/ form.
0/ 1472
1472 It9 4110
offers
411078 tea,
78 90,
90

primarily under the following brand names:


572,7:3/07901443-7,3/3,208
TATA TEA
%%%
Tata Tea
%,9,%0,
Tetley
%090
Kanan
,3,3
Chakra Gold
,7,4/
Premium
!702:2
Gold
4/
Agni
3
Devan
0;,3

Tata9, %0,
%,
%,9, Tea  
%0, Limited
29
290/ owns 8 ,55
0/ 43
438 approximately
,5574
742
2,90 51 90,
,90 tea  089,
90, estates
089,908 in  90
908 3
3 the0 89,9
9 states
89,908 of 
08 41 Assam,
88,2
88,2

West Bengal, andKerala in India. It also has operations in Australia, the Middle
08903,,3/07,,33/,9,84,84507,94383:897,,90//0
East,
89 west
,89
, 08
089 Asia,
9 8 , North
8, 47 9 Africa,Poland,
479 17
17.,!
.,!4
4,3/ Russia,
,3/ #:8
#:88,
8, and  ,
 ,3/
,3/ Kazakhstan.
,,8
,89,3
9,3 The0 .42
 %
%0 company
.425,3
5,3
was founded in 1964
,814:3/0/3 and is headquartered inKolkata, India.
,3/80,/6:,79070/34,9,3/,

Set up in 1964
$09:53 as a joint venture with UK based James Finlay and Company to
,8,439;039:709&-,80/,2083,,3/425,394

develop
/0
/0;
;0 45 value-added
045 ;,
,:0
:0,
,//
//0/ tea,, 9
0/ 90
90, the0 %
90 Tata
,9
,9, Tea, 7
, %0,
%0 Group
74:
4:5 has
5 ,8 now  product
,8 34
34 574/
574/::.9 and/ -7,3
.9 ,3
,3/ brand
-7,3/
/
presence in 
570803.0340.4:3970898430413/,817892:93,943,.425,308
countries. It is one ofIndia's first multinational companies.

The
%0
% operations
0 45
4507
07,9
,94
438 of  %,
38 41
41 Tata9, %
%,9, Tea
0, and/ 9
0, ,3/
,3 its8 8subsidiaries
98 :-
:-8
8/
/,7
,70 focus
088 14.:
14.:8 on  branded
8 43
43 -7,
7,3/
3/0/ product
0/ 574/
574/:.
:.9
9
offerings
411
41107
0738 in 90,
38 3 tea,  but
390, -:
-:9 with9,
9 
9 a 8
, significant
831
31.,
.,39 presence
395708
570803.0 in plantation
03.0 3
35
5,39
,39,9 activity93
,943,.9;
43,.9;9 in 3/,
India,
33/

32


and  $7
,3/
,3/ Sn  ,
$7 Lanka.
,3, The0 .43
3, %
%0 consolidated
.4384
84/,90/ worldwide
/,90/ 47
47/ /0 branded
//0 -7,3/
-7,3/0/ tea  business
0/ 90,
90, -:8
-:830
3088 of 90
8841
41 the  %,9
90 Tata,
%,9,
Tea Group contributes to around 
%0,74:5.4397-:90894,74:3/ 86 507.039574191742-7,3/0/90,8,080
per cent profit from branded tea sales while
the remaining 14507.039.4231742-:90,.41100,3/3;08920393.420
90702,33 per cent coming from bulk tea, coffee and investment income.
Tata tea Brand is ranked the second 248997:890/-0;07,0-7,3/3-7,3/06:9
%,9,90,7,3/87,30/9080.43/ most trusted beverage brand in brand 06:9
%,9,90,7,3/87,30/9080.43/248997:890/-0;07,0-7,3/3-7,3/ equity 

SWOT Analysis Tata Tea:
$%3,88%,9,%0,

Strengths:
$970398

Market  0,/
,709
,709 Leader:
0,/07 With a value share of 
079,;,:08,7041 22.6% in November, Tata Tea is now
34;02-07%,9,%0,834
the0 2
90
9 market
,7
,70
099 leader
0
0,/ 07 in3 9the
,/07 0 #8Rs7,000-crore
#8 

.
.7470 branded
7470 -7,3
-7,3/0
/0// 9teas
0, market,
0,88 2 ,7
,7009
9 having
,;
,;3
3

overtaken peer Hindustan 
4;079,0350073/:89,3
Unilever (HUL) which has a value share of 
&30;07&.,8,;,:08,7041 21.3% (Source: AC Nielsen).
$4:7.00803

Resources
#084:7
#084 :7.08
.08 & ,5
Capabilities:
,5,-,-
908
908 Tata9, %0
 %,
%,9, Tea, 
%0, Limited
2
290
90/ owns 8 ,5
/ 43
438 approximately
,557574
42
2,9 0 51 9tea
,90 0,
estates in the  89,
089,908390 states
89,908 of Assam,
908 41 8
88,2
8,2 West 90
 08
089 Bengal,
03,
3, and  0
 ,3/
,3/ Kerala
07,7,, in India.  %
, 33/,
33/, The0 .74
%0 crop5 ,9
.745 at
each of this plantation imbibes the characteristics of the region where it grows.
0,.41985,39,9432--0890.,7,.90789.8419070430709748
In that respect, 90,82:.
tea is 2:.08
39,970850.990,8
39,970850.9 much080
likewise.0,;
Having plantations
,;35,39
35,39,9438
,94383in ;,70/,74.
varied
3;,7 agro-climatic
0/,74.2,9.
2,9.
zones enables Tata Tea to cultivate distinct tea leaves. 
430803,-08%,9,%0,94.:9;,90/893.990,0,;08


BrandName: %,9,90,7,3/87,30/9080.43/248997:890/-0;07,0-7,3/
7,3/,20 Tata tea Brand is ranked the second most trusted beverage brand
in brand 
3-7,3/
equity.
06
06:
:9
9 The0 .425
 %
%0 company's
.425,3 ,3 8 best-selling
8 -08
-08980
980
3 brand
3 -7
-7,3/ is  
,3/ 8
8 Agni3 
3 which
. caters
. .,9
.,9078 to  90
078 94
94 the0 2
9 mass
,88
,88
segment and
802039,3/

other brands include Tata Tea Gold, Chakra, Gemini and Kanan Devan.
4907-7,3/83.:/0%,9,%0,4/,7,023,3/,3,30;,3






Experience: %,9,%0,,8-00343041904/089.425,30833/,,3/,890
50703.0 Tata Tea has been one of the oldest companies in India and has the 
advantage of skill and experience on their side.
,/;,39,0418,3/050703.0439078/0
Weakness:
0,3088

33 


No 574/
4 product
574/:.9 differentiation:
:.9 /11
/1107039
07039,943 One of the major problems Tata Tea faces is the
,9433041902,47574-028%,9,%0,1,.08890
lack of  2:.574/:.9/1107039,94303.04,941.438:20788,2,47,70,
,.41 much product differentiation hence loyalty of consumers is a major area
of concern. 
41.43.073

Branding: :094,.41-7,3/3,.9;90/29047,30/5,078,2/4
7,3/3 Due to lack of branding activitied my the organized palyers amdlow 

SWC O Ref 95' HEGBOS Wranidstctaining consumers becomes a challenge as they


89.3.48941.438:2078709,33.438:2078-0.4208,.,030,890
89.4;0794.0,507-7,3/8

Distribution Network: %0/897-:9433094741%,9,%0,.425780843
897-:9430947 The distribution network of Tata Tea comprises on 1.25 
lakh  /89
, distributers
/ 897-
7-:9
:9078 this8 8
078 9
98 is  349
8 not  2:
349 much
2:.. when

0303 you
4
4: compare
: .42
.425, 5,70 to  &
70 94
94 HUL 
& who4 ,;
4 have0 90
,;0 the0
9
strongest dealer 30947390.4:397
89743089/0,07 network in the country 
Opportunities:
55479:3908

New !74/:
0 Product.90;045203
Development:
!74/:.90;0 452039 The
9%0
% Company
0 4
4225,3
5,3 can  390
 .,3
.,3 integrate
3 907,9
7,90 into
0 394
3 fruit
94 17
17:9 &  0
:9  herbal
07-,
7-,
teas. This  8020
90,8%8 segment39,834909-0039,550/-,3419090,.42
has not yet been 9,550/-,3419090,.425,3
802039,834909-003 tapped by any of the tea companies yet and
5,30809,3/
0809,3/
this could give Tata  90,90178924;078,/;,39,0190/0./0940390798
98.4:/;0%,9, tea the first mover’s advantage if they decide to enter this
segment. 
802039


Rural
#:7,
#: Market:
7, ,
,709 There
709%
% 070700 is8 ,
a ,large
,7
70 untapped
0 : 39,55
,550/ rural
0/ 7:7,
7: 7, market
 2 ,7
,709
09 which
 . needs
. 3 00
00/8 to  -0
/8 94
94 be 
-0
exploited.  9
05490/ Although
94:
4:  %Tata
,9,
,9,%0 Tea, ,8
%0, has  2,/
,8 made0 98
2,/0 it 8
9 s presence
570
570803
803.0 felt9 3
.0 10
109 in 90
the0 7:7,
39 rural  2,
7:7, markets
2,7098
7098
this 80.9478.,7,.9070/-,,70:347,3
sector is characterized
9880.9478.,7,.907
98 by a large un organized
0/-,,70:347,30/80.947 sector ,3/4.,5,0787:0
and local players787:0
0/80.947,3/4.,5,0 rule
the rusts of the day in these markets. 
907:8984190/,390802,7098

Export79 !49039
5479
54 Potential: Tata tea is present in 
,%,9,90,857080393
!49039, 40.4:39708,74:3/9047/%070
countries around the world. There
are a lot  2470455479:39089.,30549190.,33.70,80907574/:.943
,70,49 more opportunities it can exploit if they can increase their production

capacity to exploit 9080:39,550/47/2,7098,4;079047/


.,5,.9940549 these untapped world markets all over the world. 

Mergers and Acquisitions: %070,7024709,390,.425,30833/,
07078,3/.6:89438 There are more than 1000 tea companies in India.
Tata tea  .,33.70,80982,7098,70,3/503097,943-,.6:73908082,
%,9,90, can increase its market share and penetration by acquiring these small
companies and 
.425,308,3/
also4 1472
,84
,8 forming
14723 mergers
3 207
207078 with9490
078 
9 other7 big
4907 - MNC’s
- 
8 like0 9//
8 
0 it //
9 did  147
for  %0
147 Tetley
%090 Tea,, 4
90 %0
%0, Good
44/
4/
Earth etc
,7909.

Threats:
%70,98

Low Barriers:There
4,77078 are not too many entry barriers put by policy makers this
%070,703499442,30397-,770785:9-54.2,07898
makes  the
2,08 Indian
90 3
90 3/,
/,3 Tea, 2,
3 %0
%0, market
2,70709 extremely
9 097
097020
020 fragmented
 17,
17,20
20390/ and  unorganized.
390/ ,3/
,3/ :34
:347,3
7,30/
0/ There
 %
%070
070

34


are many regionalplayers who hold small chunks of markets. By imposing Entry
,702,37043,5,07844/82,.:38412,709825483397
barriers
-,77
-, 77078 the 089
078 90 existingplayers
900 893
35,
5,078078 will
  be
 -0 in ,
-03 a better
3, -099
-09907 position
07 548
5489
943 to 05
43 94 exploit
054 49 the 089
9 90 existing
900 893
3
situation. 
89:,943

Globalization: 3/
4-,,943 India, 8
3/, is  45
8 opening
45033
033 it 8/44
9 s /4478
98 doors78 94
to MNC 8,3/s ,3/
8 and  
with99
9 that,9.42
9,9 comes08 90
.4208 the0
9

970,941
thew 
ation of the economy. The small and regional players will face intense
4-,,94341900.4342%082,,3/7043,5,0781,.0390380
competitions from big MNC s.
.4250994381742-8



INTERNAL ENVIORNMENT ANALYSIS: 
%#'#%$$

1)Resour ces:
#084:7.08
Oe 5190,089,908389,9084188,208903,%,2,/:070,
tea estates in states of Assam, West Bengal, Tamil Nadu, Kerela.
Oe  70,41
Area of  26,500 hectares under tea cultivation.
0.9,708:3/0790,.:9;,943
Oe  !74/:.08,-4:9
Produces about  6024341-,.90,,33:,
million kg of black tea annually.
Oe  $:-8/,708884.,90/.425,308;0780,8-:83088
Subsidiaries & Associated companies Overseas business

2) ,5,-
 Capabilities
,5,-9908
08
Oe  897-:94388902
Distribution system.
Oe {Strong and trusted management.
$9743,3/97:890/2,3,02039
Oe  [|Research and development.
#080,7.,3//0;0452039
Oe  |Marketing.
,7093

BUSINESS LEVEL STRATEGIES:
&$$$'$%#%$

 [| Bought90,11,.94708
4: leaf factories  .44507
4:90,11,.94708 & co-operatives
.44507,9;08 to change090897:.9
,9;08 94.,3
94.,3090 the 897:.9:704170030,1
structure of green leaf
:704170030,1
production
574/:.943
 (| Identified
/03
/03910/ branded/90,,898
910/-7,3/0 tea as 9897:8
-7,3/0/90,,8 its 97:89,70,
thrust 9,70,
area
[] To exit990-0;0
%40
%4099 the0-0;07,07
beverage retailing
7,0709,
09,3-:8 business
3-:83088 to focus
30889414.
9414.:843 on -7,3/0/57
branded
:843-7,3/ products
0/574/:.9
4/:.98 8
 [] Tata
%
%,,9, Coffee
9,  11000 8sold
411 4
4// 4off
11 its98
11 98 8stake
9,0 in3 
9, Barista,
,789 , no
789, plans
34 5,
5 of  re-entering
,38 41
41 70
700390
03907
73 the0
3 90
9
business
-:83088
[] Introducing
3974
3974/:.
/:.3/7drinks
3/738 like
380% TiON,
0%, all4;073/
,4; over073/,
India,
 [| pJaago
a
a,,
,,44 #Ref
0X campaign
0X .,
.,25
25,,33 14 followed
14 4
40/ by  9
0/ -
- the0 
90 'Aaj, $
, Se0 
Khilana
,3
,3,
, Bandh,
,3/
,3/ Pilana
 !,
!,3,
3,
Shuru'campaign to
$:7:.,25,394
target the youth for voting and work against corruption
9,709904:9147;493,3/47,,389.477:5943
 [] Focus
4
4.:
.:8
843on  brands
43 -7
-7,3
,3/8 like0 
/8 
0 Chakra
, ,7, Gold,
7,  4
4/ Gemini
/  02
023 and/ ,
3 ,3
,3/ Kanan
,3,3,3 Devan
3  0;,33
0;,33in 70
regions
704
438
38
where they are
07090,70

35 


Strong.
89743


MARKETING STRATEGY:
#%$%#%
In spite of a global presence, the brands are distributed differently depending on
3859041,4-,570803.090-7,3/8,70/897-:90//1107039/0503/343

the location. As Tata tea is far better known in India and a powerful brand there,
904.,9438%,9,90,81,7-0990734333/,,3/,54071:-7,3/9070
it  8
9
9 is  5
8 pushed
:8
:80/ on3 9
0/ 4 this8 2
9 market
,7
,7
09 and/ .4:3
09 ,3
,3/ countries
.4 :397
970
08 with
8  9 a large
9 , ,70 Indian
70 3/
3 ,3 population.
/,3 545:
5:,
,9
943
43

Therefore Tetley is the company's global face and the largest markets focus on
%0701470%090890.425,384-,1,.0,3/90,70892,709814.:843
the Tetley brand. Where both brands co-exist in one market, Tetley is positioned
90%090-7,3/070-49-7,3/8.408934302,709%09085489430/
as the premium brand
,8905702:2-7,3/


PROMOTIONAL STRATEGY:
!#%$%#%
The
% new
0 30 .campaign
0 ,2
,255,3 *’ 
, will
 migrate
 2 
7,
7,90 Tata
90 % ,9
,9, Tea
, % 0, from
0, 1742 being
1742 -03 a 5
03 , physically
8
8.,
.,
 and/
 ,3/
,3
0emotionally
24943, 7revitalizing
3 9tea
0;9, 0, 0experience
0703.0 9to4 4
507 one
30 9that will
,9   .challenge
030 9the
,0 0
consumer’s intellect to *awaken' to what is around them. It will motivate people
.438:20783900.994,,0394,98,74:3/9029249;,9050450
to 3
94 internalize
3907
9073,
3,0 the  90,
0 90
90 tea  05
90, experience
05070
0703.0 and/ 09
3.0 ,3
,3/ externalize
09073
073,
,0 their
0 907
9 social
07 84.,
84 awakening.
., ,,
,,03
033
3 It  8
 9
9 is
probably
574-,- 9the
0 1first
789 9time
20 9that
,9 ,any
3 brand
-7,3/ is8 9taking on3 9the
,3 4 mantle
0 2 ,390 4of1 
social
84.
84 ., responsibility
, 7085
708543
438
8-
-
9 in  8:
9 3
3 such
8:. a 2,
. , manner.
2,33
3307
07 The
 %0 campaign
0 .,2
.,25,
5,
3 will ,84
3 
 also
,84 provide
574;
74;/0 a
/0 ,
poignant
54
54 3,3 9 platform
3,39 5,
5,914
91472 for   .43
72 147
147 connection
.4330.
30.94
943 with 90
3 9
9 the  youth.’
90 4
4:9
:9 The0 .,2
 %
%0 campaign
.,25,
5,3 in  keeping
3 3
3 005
0053
3
with 9
9
9 the0 2,
90 magnitude
2,3
39
9:/
:/0 of  9
0 41
41 the0 89
90 strategy
897,
7,90
90 also4 plans
 ,8
,84 5,
5,38 to  /0
38 94
94 deploy
/05
54 a 2
4 , mega
0
0, approach
, ,5
,5574
574,. to
,. 94
connect
.43
.4330.
30.9 with990
9  the .438
990 consumer
.438:20
:207 at ,
7,9 all  possible
,9, 5488
5488-
-0 touch
:. points.
0 94:.
94 54
54398
398 Television
 %0
%00;
0;843 will
843 
 be
-0 the0
-09
90

lynchpin
3.
3.53 of 9
53 41 the0 .,2
90 campaign.
.,25,
5,3 There
3 %
%070 will -0
070 
 be 430
one  2,
430 main,
2,3 commercial
3 .42
.42207207.,
., and  8
 ,3/
,3/ six,  84
8 short79
8479
durat
/:7,9
/:7 on .42
,943
43 commercials.
.42207207., 8Fach
.,8 ,
,. of 90
.41 the  .42
4190 commercials.
.42207.207.,
,8 will  94:
8 
 touch
. upon
94:. :54
:543 one0 relevant
3 43
430 700
700;, ;,39
39
social
84
84.,
., issue.
8
88: 0 As
8:0 8 part
8 5,7 of 9
5,7941
941 the0.,2
90 campaign
.,25,
5,3 Tata,%0,-7,3/
3%,9 Tea brand  ,8
%,9,%0,-7,3/ has  ,84
,8 also  90
,84 tied/:59
up 990
90/:5 with90
the
Jaago India foundation. The foundation and Tata Tea have launched a website
,,43/,14:3/,943%014:3/,943,3/%,9,%0,,;0,:3.0/,0-890
that each month will cover a socially relevant issue. The site will provide all
9,90,.2439.4;07,84.,700;,3988:0%0890574;/0,
the0 70
90
9 required
706:
6:7
70/ information
0/ 31
31472
472,9
,943 on  9
43 43
43 the0 8
90 issue,
88:
8:0 will ,4
0 
 allow
,4 consumers
 .4
.438
38:2
:2078 to  3907
078 94
94 interact
3907,.9 and/
,.9 ,3
,3/
provide solutions. To generate interest and create empathy the site will feature
574;/084:9438%40307,903907089,3/.70,90025,99089010,9:70
four 8479124390945
14:7 short film on the 945.41
14:78479124390 topic.41902439
of 9024399079,3900;84
the month. 9079,3900;843,3/900-890
Other than television3,3/900-890
and the website
9the
0 .campaign
,25,3 will
 ,also
84 use
:80 7radio,
,/4 
press,
0888 8shop
5708 45 level
45 0;0 visibility
0;0 ;
;8
8-9  ,and
9 3/ 9the
0 new
0 30 outdoor
0 4:
4:9
9/447 medium
47 2 0/:2 of  2
:2 41
41 malls
, and/
,8 ,3
,3/

36


multiplexes
2 :95008 9to4 /
drive home
7;0  420 9the message
0 2 088,0 4of1 Jaago Re.0 
,,4 # Many
,3 4of1 9the
0
communication
.42
.422:
2:3.
3.,94
,943 tools
3 94 being planned
9448-035,33
48-035,330/ at 902,8
0/,9 the malls  ,3/
,9902,8 and  2:
,3/ multiplexes
2:95
950
008 will-0:80/
08 
 be used
-0:80/
for the first time in the country.
147901789920390.4:397



HINDUSTAN UNILEVER LIMITED:
&$%&'#%
Company Profile:
425,3!7410
Unilever
&3
&30
0;0
;07 owns
7 4
438 two4 41
38 9
94 of 9
the0 24
90 most89 
2489 widely
/
/0 recognized
0 70.
70.4
43
30/ product
0/ 574/
574/:.
:.9 lines
9 3
308 Lipton
08 59
5943 and/
43 ,3
,3/
Brooke
7
744
440 Bond.
0 4
43/
3/ The0 2,
 %
%0 major
2,4
47 competition
7 .42
.4250
5099
994
43 facing
3 1,
1,.3
.3 Lever
 0;
0;07 at present
07 ,9 57080
5708039 is  17
39 8
8 from
1742 Wagh
42 ,
,

Bakri Chai Tea, who is truly a market challenger.
,7,%0,4897:,2,709.,0307
Lipton
594
5943 comprises
3.42
.4257
57808 of 0
808 41 Yellow
04 Label
4 , -0 which
,-0 
. is designed
.8/08
8/0830/ for  upper
30/ 147
147 :55
:5507 middle,
07 2
2//
//0 upper
0:55
:5507
07
lower and upper middle class, which is a market leader in the industry, 1t comes
407,3/:55072//0.,88.8,2,7090,/073903/:8979.4208
in all the packages including hard packs, jars, and teabags. Lipton yellow label
3,905,.,083.:/3,7/5,.8,78,3/90,-,8594304,-0
although the direct competitor of Brooke Bond Supreme comes in the family of
,94:90/70.9.4250994741744043/$:57020.42083901,241
Unilever
&3
&3 0;
0;07 so  9
07 84
84 it  8
9 is  prone
8 57
5743
430 to  9
0 94
94 its8 .42
98 competing
.4250
509
93 attacks.
3 ,99,
,99,.
.8 Lipton
8  594
5943 follows
3 14
144
48 a 2
8 , massive
,88
,88;
;0
promotion scheme to hold its share. Rich bru is designed for middle and lower
574249438.020944/988,70#.-7:8/0830/1472//0,3/407
upperclasses, and Pearl dust is designed for rural areas, mostly districts of Sindh
:5507.,8808,3/!0,7/:898/0830/1477:7,,70,82489/897.9841$3/
where consumption of dust is extensive.
070.438:2594341/:89809038;0

Brooke Bond comprises of:
744043/.425780841
Brooke Bond
744043/

PUP Mel
$:57020
%,,0
3 #4808
 Roses
Red Label
#0/,-0
Al Karak Tea
,7,%0,






37


SWOT Analysis for (HUL):
$%3,88147&

Strength:
$97039

Bra  3/
7,
7, ndNa
3/, me:  
, 20 According
..4
..47/
7/3 to  7
3 94
94 Brand
7,3
,3/ Equity,
/ 6
6:
:9
9 HUL ,
 &
& has8 90
,8 the0 ,7
9 largest
,708
089 number
9 3:2
3:2-0
-07 of
7 41

-7,3/8390489
Prada
%7:890
%7: /BHA
890/ 7,
7,3/8 YE4S
3/8 {st
89 HUL  ,8
89&
& has  ,
,8 a ;0789743
very
;0 strong7
789743 Brand
7,3
,3/ name03
/3,2
3,20 in 90
the0 3/,
39 Indian
3/,3 market.
3 2 ,7
,709
09
Its brands are strength for the company.
98-7,3/8,7089703914790.425,3

Strong Distribution Network: 3/:89,3&30;078/897-:943.4;0784;07
$9743897-:9430947 Hindustan Unilever's distribution covers over 1
million retails outlets across India directly and its products are available in over
243709,84:9098,.74883/,/70.9,3/98574/:.98,70,;,,-034;07
6.32434:909833/,030,7
 million outlets in India, 1.e., nearly 80% of the retail outlets in India. It has
4190709,4:909833/,9,8
39  1factories
 ,.
,.94
94770
08 in  9
8 3
3 the0 .country.
90 4:3
:397
97 Two4 4
 %
%4 out of  9three
:9 41
41 700 Indians
700 3/
3/,
,3 use0 the
38 :80
:8 company’s
90 .42
.4 25,3,3
88
products
574/:.98
574 and &574/:.98,;090,7089.438
/:.98,3/ HUL products
,3/&574/ have the largest consumer reach being available
:.98,;090,7089.438:20770,.-03,;,,
:20770,.-03,;,,-03 in
-03
over80
4;07 per cent of consumer homes across India. 
507.03941.438:2074208,.74883/,

Unique sizes ,;
&36:0808 have0-0033974/:.0/147;,74:88020
been introduced/147;,74:880203983.:/
,;0-0033974/:.0 for various segments including teabags, 897
3983.:/390,-,8 stir
390,-,8897
ready. 
70,/

Product
!74/:
!74 /:.9 Range:
.9 #,3
#,30 0 Wider
/07 product
/07 57
574/
4/:. 9 7range
:.9 ,3
,30  with
9 technological
9 90.
90.34344
4
.,
., superiority,
 8:50
8: 507747
479
9 e.g.
 0
0
Brooke Bond's  4990,.,3
744043/8 hot tea can 


Weakness:
0,3088
It9 8
9 is  ,
8 a 5 product
:.99 being
74/:. -0 3 introduced
03 397
974/
4/: 0/ in3 ,3
:.0/ an  ,already
,3 70,/
,/ existing
 0
0 93 9tea
893 0, market
0, 2 ,7
,7 with
09 
9
9
established brands. 
089,-80/-7,3/8
No4 .425
4 competitive
.42509099
9;
;0 advantage
0 ,/;
,/ ;,3
,39,9,0 can,3 be
0 .,
.,3 -0 brought
-0 -7
-74:
4:9 in  98
9 3
3 this8 3/
9 industry.
3/:897
:897 Only 2
 3
3 massive
,88
,88;0
;0
advertising and  promotional
,/;07983,3/ activities may entice consumer for trial. 
57424943,,.9;9082,039.0.438:20714797,

Brand  :9
7,3/
7,3/ Dilution:
:943 Having
43,
,; ;3
3 too4 2
 94
944 many
,3 brand
,3 -7
-7,3/ extensions
,3/ 0
090
9038
3843
438 can  /:
8 .,3
.,3 dilute
/:90 and  .4
90 ,3/
,3/ confuse
.431
31:80
:80
consumer  perception
.438:207 507.
507.05059
943 and/ 
43 ,3
,3/ give
; fresh
;0 170
1708 and  30
8 ,3/
,3/ new  .425
30 competitors
.4 2509 099478 to
9478 94 seize
94 80
800 market
0 2,
2,7709
09
share. 
8,70

Opportunities:
55479:3908

Alliance
,3
 .0 with
,3.0 
9 Pepsi  94
9 !058
!058 to ,..
access
,..088 massive
088 2,
2,88;
88;0 distribution
0 /8
/897
97-:
-:94
943 network.
3 309
30947 Presence
47 !708
!70803.03.0 of big,
0 41 -
-

well known partners drives demand further.
03435,793078/7;08/02,3/1:7907
Declining markets for other beverages such as soft drinks
0.332,70981474907-0;07,088:.,88419/738

38 



Rural
#:7,
#: Market:
7, ,
,709 There
709%
% 07 0 is8 ,
070 a ,
large
,7
70 untapped
0 :39,55
,550/ rural
0/ 7:7,
7: 7, market
 2 ,7
,709
09 which
 . needs
. 3 00
00/8 to  -0
/8 94
94 be 
-0
exploited.  9
05490/ Although
94:
4: Tata
 % ,9,
,9,%0Tea, ,8
%0, has  2,/
,8 made0 98
2,/0 it 8
9 s presence
570
570803
803.0 felt9 3
.0 10
109 in 90
the0 7:7,
39 rural  2,
7:7, markets
2,7098
7098
this sectors is characterized by a large un organized sector and local players rule
9880.94788.,7,.9070/-,,70:347,30/80.947,3/4.,5,0787:0
the rusts of the day in these markets.  70,907,,703088410,9-0301984190,
907:8984190/,390802,7098 Greater awareness of health benefits of tea. 



Threats:
%70,98

A rigorous threat is the increasing number of branded and unbranded tea in the
7474:8970,98903.70,833:2-0741-7,3/0/,3/:3-7,3/0/90,390
market09 9
2,7
2,709 with ,25
9 ample0 price
,250 57
57.0 difference.
.0 /1
/1107
10703.
03.0 For7 9
0 4
47 that,
9,9 established
,9 089,-
089,-8
80/ companies
0/ .42
.425,3
5,308 need/ 94
08 300
300/ to
increase their advertising and promotional budget. There is a need to get a better
3.70,80907,/;07983,3/57424943,-:/09%0708,300/9409,-09907
shelf space and more retailer patronization for the company's brand.
80185,.0,3/2470709,075,9743,94314790.425,38-7,3/
Unilever presently pays80%
&30;0757080395,8 as 9,08432547
,8 taxes
,89, on imported
0843254790/ tea. %8
90/ 90, This  78
90,%8 rise032
in 25479
7803 import duty
5479/:9
/:9

on tea by government is intended to discourage it's consumption, which possess


4390,-4;073203983903/0/94/8.4:7,098.438:25943.5488088
to be a thréat as it has resulted in higher prices for the consumers.
94-0,970,9,89,8708:90/30757.0814790.438:2078

Low Barriers: %070,703499442,30397-,770785:9254.2,07898
4,77078 There are not too many entry barriers put my policy makers this
makes  903/,3%0,2,70909702017,20390/,3/:347,30/%070,70
2,08 the Indian Tea market extremely fragmented and unorganized. There are
many regional,5
2,37043
2, 37043, players
5,07 8 who
,078 
4 hold  82
44/
4/ small
82, chunks
, .:
.:3
38 of  2
8 41
41 markets.
,7
,7098
098 By imposing
 2548
25483 Entry
3 3
397
97
barriers
-,77
-, 77078 the0 0
078 9
90 existing
089 players
8935, 078 will
35,078 
 be in ,-099
-03
-03 a better
, position
-099075489
07548943 to 054
43 94
940exploit the 08
54990
990 existing
0893
93
situation.  !70803.04149072,475,0788:.,84.,4,,3/08900,/3
89:,943 Presence of other major players such as Coca-Cola and Nestle leading
to tough .42509943
9494: competition 

PRESENT STRATEGY:
!#$%$%#%

Ownership: 
30785
The
% owner
0 4
430
307 of1 9
7 4 the0 premium
90 570
702
2:
:2 Brooke
2  74
744 Bond
400 43/ and/ 
3/ ,3
,3/ Lipton
5943 9tea
5943 0, brands
0, -7,3
-7,3/8 in  3/
/8 3
3 India,
3/,
,
Hindustan

3/
3/:8
:89,
9,3 Unilever
3 & 3
30;
0;07 Ltd(HUL),
07 9
9/
/&
& has8 9,
 ,8
, taken
9,03 a /0.
03 , decisive
/0 .8;0 8step
8; 905 towards
905 94,
94 7/8 regaining
,7/8 70
70,
,3
33
3
absolute
,-8
,-84:
4:90 market
90 2 ,7
,7
09 leadership
09 0
0,
,/07
07885 1from
5 74
742 Tata
2 % ,9, Tea
9, % 0, Ltd
0,  9/ by
9/ entering
- 03
039907
073 9the
3 0 8so-called
4.
.,
,0
0/
/
economy segment of the market as well.
0.434280203941902,709,80




Value Leadership:
',:00,/0785

39


HUL ,7
&
& already
,70,/
0,/ leads
 0,/8 the
0,/8 9
90 domestic
0 /4
/420
2089
89. tea, 2
. 90
90, market
,7
,709 in  907
09 3
3 terms
90728 of  ;
28 41
41 value
,:0 and/ has
,:0 ,3
,3/ ,88 been
, -0
-003
03
narrowing
3,77
3,774
43 the0 
3 90
9 gap
,5 in  ;
,5 3
3 volume
4:
4:2 sales,
20 8,
8,08
08 where
  07
070 Tata9, %0
0 %,
%,9, Tea's
%0, economy
,88 0.
0.4342 brand
4342 -7,
-7,3/ Agni,
3/  3
3

priced at around Rs150
57.0/,9,74:3/#8 per kg, gives it the edge.
507;089900/0

New Variants:
0',7,398
HUL
& launched
,:3.0/ its98 
Brooke Bond
7440  Sehatmand
43/ $0,92,3/ 9tea
0, in3 
Madhya Pradesh,
,/, ! 7,/08
Chhattisgarh

,998
,998,7 and ,7
,7 ,3/ Bihar,7 3
,3/ in ,90
late ,3:,7
January,
,90,3: ,7 using
:8
:83 non-governmental
3 343
3434;0
4;073203
732039, organizations
9,47,3
47,3,94
,9438
38
among other channels in a low-profile promotional campaign.
,2434907.,33083,45741057424943,.,25,3
The new tea, priced at Rs.170-1 805073.:
%03090,57.0/,9#8 per kg, includes
5073.:/0814folic.,./.,.:2,3/4907
acid, calcium ,3/4907
/0814.,./.,.:2 and other
vitamins as part
;9,238,85,79
of its ingredients.
4198370/0398
HUL 050
&
& expects
050.9
.98 Brooke
8  74
744
40 Bond
0 43
43/ Sehatmand
/ $0
$0,
,92
92,3
,3/ to  .7
/ 94
94 create
.70,
0,90 a 3
90 , new
0 8segment
0 02
02039 in  90
039 3
3 the850
90
million tones (mt) a
2439430829,
year tea industry. Of this, packaged tea accounts for less than 
0,790,3/:8971985,.,0/90,,..4:3981470889,3 350mt
29






















40


RECOMMENDATIONS
# %$ % TO % TOP
!  2 ! PLAYERS
#$ % TO INCREASE
#$
MARKET SHARE:
#%$#

Increase number of service outlets 370.039920
3.70,803:2-0741807;.04:9098 : In recent times89070,;0-0033:2074
there have -0033:2074:8
370.03992089070,;0 been numerous :8
coffee  84
.41100 shops
8458 springing
58857
85733 up
33 in %
:53 Tier
%07 A .908
07  cities
.9 like0 :2
08
0 Mumbai,
:2-,
-, Delhi,
 0
0
 Bangalore
 ,
,3,
3,47
470 etc
0 09.

Tea house shpul be setup  in a similar fashion and premium quality tea’s should
%0,4:8085:-0809:53,82,71,843,3/5702:26:,990,884:/
-0807;0/,990804:9098

Strategic
$97,90.
$97,9 alliance:
0. ,,3
,,3.0 Tie0 up
.0%
%0 :5 with
:5 9 their
9 9
9007 own3 7,
7 4
43 range
7,3
30 of  1;
0 41
41 five0 89,7
1;0 star
89 hotels
,7 4
490 908 to  8:55
8 94
94 supply
8: 55

premium
5702:2 6:, quality
6:,9
9 tea  ,3
 90,
90, and/ .41
,3/ coffee
.41100
100 ,8as  ,8
,8 also4 9
,84 with4
9 lower0703/
407 end  97
03/ three
9700 star749
00 89,
89,7 hotel
490
03n ,84
3 also 
,84
local eateries (Udipi joints etc). Tie-up with airlines, rajdhani, shatabdi, caterers
4.,0,90708&/5439809.%0:59,73087,/,38,9,-/.,907078
etc to promote their tea coffee also mineral water brands 
09.94574249090790,.41100,842307,,907-7,3/8

Own Depots: %489,7943/0549841%,9,%0,,3/&90,849,990.,380
305498 To start own depots of Tata Tea and HUL tea so that they can sell
loose
448
4 480 tea, 9:8
0 90
90, thus
9 reducing
:8 70
70//:.
:.33 cost89 41
 .489
.4 of  packing
41 5,
5,..33
 which
. . will ,8
 
 also
, reduce
84 70
70/:
/:.0 the0 '
.0 90
9 Vat,9 & 
,9 
additional charges. Thus  2,880817424073.42074:54:/-00110.9;0
,//943,.,708%:8 masses from lower income group would be effectively
targeted. 
9,7090/

Penetration:  0
!03097,943 Deeper
005 07 penetration
0507 50
5030
3097
97,9
,94343 3in  7:
3 rural
7:7, markets
7, 2 ,7 098 by
,7098 - using
- :83
:83 self1 05
 801
80 help5 42
0 women
4203 03
groups for /44794/447803
74:58147 door to door selling. 

Profit9 2,
!7419
!741 margins
2,73
738 for7 709,
8 14
147 retailers:
709,07
07883Increase
3.70 ,80 profit
.70,80 574
57419 margins
19 2 ,7
,738 for  709
38 147
147 retailers
709,
,078 to ,.
078 94 achieve
,.0; 0;0
0
higher07 8,08
07
 sales  ;4
volume
;4:2
:20 as 90
0 ,8
,89they are  90
0,70
,70 the  2,
90 main331
2,3 influencing
31:0
:03.
3.3 factors
3 1,.9
1,.9478 in 407
478 3 lower07 3.42
34 income
3 .420 0
group people. 
74:550450

Promotional
!7424943,
!742 4943, activities:
 ,.9 ;908 4
,.9;908 More70 3:2
470 number
3:2-0 -07 of ,/
7 41 ads8 
,/8 which
..
 ,7are0 06
,70 equally
06:,:, effective
 011
0110.0.9;
9;0 as
0 ,8
middle class  people
2//0.,88 from towns get influenced by ads to a large extent g) Jago
50450174294380931:03.0/-,/894,,7009039,4
Re campaign. 
#0.,25,3









4]


Product.9 33
!74/:
!74/:.9 Innovation:
334;,94
4;,943 Enter
3 3
3907 new  2,
907 30
30 market
2,70
709 segment
9 80
8020
2039 with9574/:.9
39 product.933
9574/: innovation
334;
4;,94
,943 like0
3
0
tea 1,;470/.0.70,2890,3090,.03:2809.
90, flavored ice-creams, tea wine, tea chewing gums etc 

Flavors: ,:3.3411,;470/90,8-,2-44.:583.3,-739943/,944
,;478 Launching of flavored teas bamboo cups in china bring it to India too. 
Launching of more flavors in India. (lemon tea, black tea).
,:3.34124701,;47833/,024390,-,.90,


Related
#0,90/
#0,9 Diversification:
0/ ;
;0781.
0781.,943 Future
,943:9
 :9:7
:70 strategy
0 897,
897,90
90 4 of1 0390
entering
03 907
73 children’s
3 .
. /7
/703
038 drinks
8 /73
/7 3 like
8 
0
Complan, 4:73;9,47.8
425,3 Bournvita, Horlicks. 

Bundling: !74;/3,-:3/05,.0,82,90,8,.091700928
:3/3 Providing a bundle pack like a small tea sachet free with 100 Gms
pack
5,.41of biscuits.
-8.:98

New Markets: 547
0,7098 Explore030,3/:39,550/2,7098
new and untapped
547030,3/:39,55 markets 3494333/,-:9,843
not only in India -:9,843
0/2,70983494333/, but also in
different .4:39708
/1107039 countries. 

Branding: %0945
7,3/3 The top  2 5,0780%,9,%0,&84:/14.:8907,9903943
players i.e. Tata Tea & HUL should focus their attention
on proper 
43574507
branding
-7,3/
-7,3/3 of their  products
3 41907
41907 57
574/:
4/:.98 and  8
.98 ,3/
,3/ should
84:/ try  94
4:/ 97
97 to  .70
94 create
.70,90 a brand
,90 ,-7,3
, -7,3/ loyalty
/ 4,
4 among  90
,9,243
9,243 the
consumers
.438:2078
of their products
41907574/:.98

















42













4

,5907
RAPA ces 
#010703.08














43 


WEBSITES
$%$

http://www .american.edu/TED/indiatea.htm
995,207.,30/:%3/,90,92

http://beacononline.wordpress.com/2008/10/23/marketing-problem-faced-by-
995-0,.43433047/57088.422,7093574-021,.0/-

he-tea-
9090,
indusity/
3/:897

www.gmsworldnet.com/.../vision
2847/309.42;843* 2020 reinventing indian _tea_ industry
*703;0393*3/,3*90,*3/:897

http://www. financialexpress.com/news/tata-tea-hul-war-brews-in-tea-
99513,3.,057088.423089,9,90,:,7-708390,
mkt/496631/
29 

www.hindustantimes.com
3/:89,39208.42

http://www. indiatea.org/teascenario/teascenario.html (Financial)
9953/,90,4790,8.03,7490,8.03,74923,3.,

www.naukrihub.com
3,:7:-.42

www.teaboard.gov.in
90,-4,7/4;3

http://www.scribd.com/doc/24393545/FMCG-Project
9958.7-/.42/4. !740.9

http://www.scribd.com/doc/26195273/Lipton-Y
9958.7-/.42/4. ellow-Label-tea-survey
594304,-090,8:7;0

www.wikipedia.com
50/,.42

teaboard.gov.in/pdf/tea_statistics/Tea_Statistics 1955.pdf
90,-4,7/4;35/190,*89,989.8%0,*$9,989.8*5/1

http://www.thehindubusinessline.com
995903/:-:8308830.42





44











Chapter-5
,5907
Conclusion
43.:843















45 


From this project we come across that there is much competition in the FMCG
742985740.90.420,.74889,9907082:..42509943390
sector. All the companies are making their strategy to sustain in the market with
80.94790.425,308,702,3907897,90948:89,33902,7099
good profit. Here we see the two players of tea industry and their strategy.
44/57419070080090945,0784190,3/:897,3/907897,90
We can say that even if the company goes strong after that it has to be ware with
0.,38,9,90;03190.425,340889743,19079,99,894-0,709
the changing environment of the market, if the company want to gain profit in
90.,3303;743203941902,709190.425,3,3994,3574193

EAAANS SAE AAR LEC EAE ORTOP HD LRG PRS HER, CRRA VENE He
902,709,3/,84940944/5489433902,709,..425,3,;094
/039198897039,3/0,308817429,943,..425,3.,38:7;;0390
marker
2,709



46


You might also like