Scribd
Upload
25 views2 pages

TD2 SeismicDesign TankWater 5GC20212022 Statement

This document describes a simplified dynamic analysis of a water tank tower subjected to seismic shaking. The tower is modeled as a single degree of freedom (SDOF) system with lumped masses at the bottom and top of a reinforced concrete column. The analysis determines the system's stiffness, natural period, maximum acceleration response, seismic force, and displacement. Bending moment, shear force, and reinforcement bar diagrams are also calculated to verify the column's design at the ultimate limit state under seismic loads.

Uploaded by

Garth
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
25 views2 pages

TD2 SeismicDesign TankWater 5GC20212022 Statement

This document describes a simplified dynamic analysis of a water tank tower subjected to seismic shaking. The tower is modeled as a single degree of freedom (SDOF) system with lumped masses at the bottom and top of a reinforced concrete column. The analysis determines the system's stiffness, natural period, maximum acceleration response, seismic force, and displacement. Bending moment, shear force, and reinforcement bar diagrams are also calculated to verify the column's design at the ultimate limit state under seismic loads.

Uploaded by

Garth
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

SEISMIC DESIGN– 5GC –2022-2023 ENISE

TD2 – Water Tank Dynamic Analysis


Single Degree Of Freedom System
SIMPLIFIED ANALYSIS of TANK TOWER Motion
Under Seismic Shaking
Let’s consider an idealization model of a tank tower. It consists of one inextensional vacuum cylinder column with an
external diameter of 2,00m and a thickness of 30 cm This column is mode of reinforced concrete , the concrete class
is C25/30 ( Ecm = 31 GPa ). This tank has to resist to an horizontal earthquake excitation. For the dynamic model, we
could simplify the analysis by using a SDOF model with masses concentrated exclusively on the bottom or on the top
of the structure, and the stiffness linked exclusively to the bending of the column. So that we could consider a mass-
string system.
The earthqake motion could be described by the pseudo acceleration spectrum below.

Simplified Model
a [m/s2] Design Pseudo
Mass in motion:
Acceleration Spectrum
* Tanker = 150T
Cross sectional * % of the mass of
Modélisation

geometry the column (to


determine)
15 m 5 5.(0,4/T)2/3

0,4 T [s]

1. Determine the Stiffness of this system


Modal Analysis

2. Determine the mass Msis in motion

3. Determine the fundamental natural period

4. Determine the maximum acceleration response of the structure due to the earthquake excitation
Analyse spectrale

5. Maximal Seismic Force induced 6. Maximum Displacement

7. Flexural moment diagram and Shearing Force Diagram

8. Reinforced bars necessary to resist (ULS)


Dimensionnement
BA

1
SEISMIC DESIGN– 5GC –2022-2023 ENISE
TD2 – Water Tank Dynamic Analysis

Determination of Reinforced Bars at ULS


Flexional Moment + Axial Force interaction abacus / ULS in Seismic situation

You might also like