Previewpdf
Previewpdf
Drawing upon international expertise, and including some of the most well-known academics
and practitioners in the field, The Routledge International Handbook of Human Aggression is the first
reference work to fully capture how our understanding of aggression has been refined and
reconceptualised in recent years.
Divided into five sections, the handbook covers some of the most interesting and timely
topics within human aggression research, with analysis of both indirect and direct forms of
aggression, and including chapters on sexual aggression, workplace bullying, animal abuse, gang
violence and female aggression. It recognises that, in many cases, aggression is an adaptive choice
rather than a moral choice.
Providing practitioners and academics with an up-to-date resource that covers broad areas of
interest and application, the book will be essential reading for students, researchers and practi-
tioners associated with a range of social science disciplines, including psychology, criminology,
social work and sociology, particularly those with an interest in developmental, organisational,
forensic and criminal justice allied disciplines.
Philip Birch, BSocSci.(Hons); PG Cert (HEP); PG Cert. (SSRM); PG Dip (SocSci); MSc; PhD
is a Senior Lecturer in Criminology in the Centre for Law and Justice at Charles Sturt University,
Australia. He has previously held posts at the University of Western Sydney, the University of
New South Wales, Sydney, Australia and the University of Huddersfield, in the UK. Prior to
entering academia, Philip worked as a criminologist in the field, holding posts in the UK prison
service as well as in the crime and disorder field, which involved managing a specialist crime
unit. Philip has published internationally, including books, book chapters, peer-reviewed articles
and government reports in his main areas of research – offender management and rehabilitation;
police, prisons and probation practices; gender symmetry violence with a particular focus on
domestic family violence and sex work. He has secured over $790,000 in research grants, which
have addressed a variety of themes within his areas of expertise. Philip holds an honorary research
fellowship at the Institute of Positive Psychology and Education, Australia Catholic University
and in the School of Psychology, University of Central Lancashire, UK, as well as being a
Senior Research Associate in the Ashworth Research Centre, Mersey Health Care, National
Health Services, UK. Philip is the Editor-in-Chief of the Journal of Criminological Research, Policy
and Practice and currently sits on the editorial board of the Journal of Aggression, Conflict and Peace
Research.
Typeset in Bembo
by Keystroke, Neville Lodge, Tettenhall, Wolverhampton
Dedications
To my twin sister Jane, who always stands by and supports me: I love her with all my heart. (CI)
To Jonathan, Sebastian and Leo, the most peaceful people I know, and to Mojo, Miss Sparkles
and Elfrid, the most peaceful four-legged people I know. (JI)
List of figures xi
List of tables xiii
List of contributors xv
Preface: Human aggression: How far have we come? xxv
Jane L. Ireland, Philip Birch, Carol A. Ireland
SECTION I
Understanding general aggression 1
6 Homicide adaptations 70
Joshua Duntley, David M. Buss
vii
Contents
SECTION II
Bullying across contexts 107
11 Cyberbullying 131
Robin Kowalski
SECTION III
Relationships and family aggression 153
viii
Contents
SECTION IV
Sexual aggression 249
SECTION V
Contemporary and emerging issues 317
ix
Contents
Index 424
x
Figures
xi
Tables
xiii
Contributors
Jeffrey Abracen has worked with the Correctional Service of Canada (CSC) from 1995 and has
occupied a number of positions within the organisation. Dr Abracen is currently the Chief
Psychologist for Central District (Ontario) Parole. He has previously been responsible for the
management of sex offender treatment programmes in Central District (Ontario) Parole and has
worked at the High Intensity Sex Offender Treatment programme operated by CSC at the
Regional Treatment Centre (Ontario).
Paula Allen-Meares, PhD, MSW, is the John Corbally Presidential Professor and Professor
of Medicine in the College of Medicine at the University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC). She is
Chancellor Emerita at UIC and Vice President of the University of Illinois. She also holds
faculty appointments on both the UIC and University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Dr Allen-Meares is Dean and Professor Emerita and the Normal Radin Collegiate Professor
at the University of Michigan. She is an elected member of the National Academy of
Medicine, the Royal Society of Medicine and is a past trustee of the New York Academy
of Medicine. She serves on a number of editorial boards and has over 170 articles, chapters, books
and commentaries. Her scholarly works have been translated into other languages and studied
around the world.
John Archer is Professor of Psychology at the University of Central Lancashire, United Kingdom.
He is the author of over 100 articles, mostly on human aggression. He is the author of several
books including: The Behavioural Biology of Aggression, The Nature of Grief and (with Barbara
Lloyd) Sex and Gender. He is a former president of the International Society for Research on
Aggression (ISRA), a fellow of the British Psychological Society and Editor-in-Chief of Aggressive
Behavior (2012–present). He was recipient of the International Society for Research on
Aggression’s Scott Award, for lifetime achievement, in 2016.
Greg Barton is Co-Director of the Australian Intervention Support Hub (AISH) and Professor
of Global Islamic Politics at the Alfred Deakin Institute. Greg has been active for the past
20 years in interfaith dialogue initiatives and has a deep commitment to building understanding
xv
Contributors
of Islam and Muslim society. The central axis of his research interests is the way in which
religious thought, individual believers and religious communities respond to modernity and to
the modern nation state. He also has a strong general interest in comparative international
politics. He has undertaken extensive research on Indonesian politics and society, especially of
the role of Islam. Since 2004 he has made a comparative study of progressive Islamic thought in
Turkey and Indonesia. He also has a general interest in security studies and human security
and a particular interest in countering violent extremism, and continues to research Islamic and
Islamist movements in Southeast Asia and around the world.
Syeda Batool has recently completed her bachelor’s degree in Psychology and a master’s degree
in Health Psychology. She has an avid interest in the study of mental health, consciences and
morality and hopes to pursue a career in this area. She is currently completing her research
internship in a forensic psychiatric unit and on placement, assessing impacts of health promotion
on children.
Tracy A. Bedrosian is a post-doctoral fellow in the Laboratory of Genetics at the Salk Institute
for Biological Studies. Dr Bedrosian earned her BS in Neuroscience from the University of
Michigan, Ann Arbor. She went on to earn her PhD in Neuroscience from The Ohio State
University before beginning post-doctoral work at the Salk Institute. Dr Bedrosian has published
extensively in the field of behavioural neuroscience, including several articles and chapters on
the neurobiology of aggression.
Kaj Björkqvist has been Professor of Developmental Psychology at Åbo Akademi University,
Finland, since 1992. He is a former president of the International Society of Research on
Aggression. His research is focused on different forms of human aggression, in particular, indirect
aggression, sex differences in aggression, school and workplace bullying, conflict resolution,
media violence and cross-cultural comparisons.
Emily Blake, PhD, is an independent researcher who works regularly with the University of
Kent. Emily has conducted and assisted with research in the field of adult and child sexual
offending, and is particularly interested in the aetiology of sexual offending behaviour, risk of
offending and associated mental health and treatment needs. More recently, Emily has been
involved in ongoing research in the field of adults and young people with an intellectual disability
or autism who have sexually offended or display sexually harmful behaviour.
Erica Bowen is Professor of Violence Prevention Research within the National Centre for the
Study and Prevention of Violence and Abuse at the University of Worcester. Erica has researched
domestic violence with a focus on evaluating and designing prevention programmes for
adults and young people since 2000. She is a Chartered Psychologist (British Psychological
Society) and registered forensic psychologist (Health and Care Professions Council). Her current
research interests include understanding the factors that lead to resilience in children exposed to
inter-parental violence, and how best to address the needs of perpetrators of domestic violence
who have learning disabilities.
xvi
Contributors
The Dangerous Passion: Why Jealousy is as Necessary as Love and Sex; The Murderer Next Door: Why
the Mind is Designed to Kill; and Why Women Have Sex (with Cindy Meston). Buss has roughly
300 scientific publications, and he has been cited as one of the 30 most influential living
psychologists.
Raymond R. Corrado is a Full Professor in the School of Criminology at Simon Fraser University
and was an associate faculty member in the Psychology department and the Faculty of Health
Sciences. He is a Visiting Fellow at Clare Hall College and the Institute of Criminology,
University of Cambridge. He is a founding member of the Mental Health, Law, and Policy
Institute at Simon Fraser University. He has published over 100 articles and book chapters on a
wide variety of policy issues, including juvenile justice, violent young offenders, mental health,
adolescent psychopathy, Aboriginal victimisation, child/adolescent case management strategies
and terrorism.
Joshua Duntley, PhD, is an Associate Professor of Criminal Justice and Associated Faculty in the
Psychology Program at Stockton University. His research and publications examine homicide,
non-lethal violence, stalking, victimisation and human mating strategies. He co-edited the
volume Evolutionary Forensic Psychology and is co-author of the book Research Stories for Introductory
Psychology. Joshua is also the Director of Stockton University’s Honors Program and Co-Director
of the Stockton CSI summer camp for high school students.
xvii
Contributors
Douglas P. Fry is Professor and Chair of the Anthropology Department at the University of
Alabama at Birmingham and concurrently Docent in the Developmental Psychology Program
at Åbo Akademi University in Finland. Professor Fry earned his doctorate in Anthropology
from Indiana University in 1986. Fry has written extensively on aggression, conflict resolution
and war and peace. He is author of Beyond War: The Human Potential for Peace and co-editor of
Keeping the Peace: Conflict Resolution and Peaceful Societies Around the World and Cultural Variation
in Conflict Resolution: Alternatives to Violence. He is an associate editor of the Encyclopedia of
Violence, Peace, and Conflict. Dr Fry’s own cross-cultural research showing a paucity of war among
nomadic forager societies has been published in Science. He is the recipient of the 2015 Peace
Scholar-Educator Award, of the Peace and Justice Studies Association.
Jason Gravel is a PhD candidate in the Department of Criminology, Law, and Society at the
University of California, Irvine. He completed his master’s thesis on criminal versatility in street
gang networks at Simon Fraser University in 2013. His research interests include social network
analysis, street gangs, co-offending, gun violence and crime prevention and intervention. His
recent work has been published in Criminology & Public Policy, Journal of Quantitative Criminology,
Injury Prevention and Criminal Justice & Behavior.
Neil Gredecki, PhD, is a registered forensic psychologist with over 14 years’ experience of
working in prisons and a variety of NHS and private sector settings. This includes high, medium
and low secure psychiatric hospitals as well as working with adolescents and in community and
inpatient settings. He holds the role of Registrar and Chief Supervisor for the British Psychological
Society’s Qualification in Forensic Psychology and currently has a senior role within Her
Majesty’s Prison & Probation Service (HMPPS). In addition to working in clinical posts, Neil
has extensive experience of supervision and management and conducts research with staff
working in forensic settings. He is co-editor of the Journal of Forensic Practice.
Margaret Guyer, PhD, a clinician and researcher, has worked with people with severe mental
illness for more than 20 years. As an administrator with the Massachusetts Department of Mental
Health she is responsible for the identification, evaluation and dissemination of evidence-based
practices within the Department of Mental Health and among community providers. She serves
as the Chair for the Massachusetts Department of Mental Health Institutional Review Board,
manages the Department’s Training Grants and Research Centers of Excellence as well as serving
as the liaison with the Department of Public Health concerning suicide.
Kerensa Hocken, PhD, is a registered forensic psychologist and British Psychological Society
Chartered Psychologist. She has worked with people convicted of sexual offences for 17 years
and specialises in working with those who have intellectual disabilities. Kerensa is currently the
Midlands Lead Psychologist for people convicted of sexual offences in Her Majesty’s Prison &
xviii
Contributors
Probation Service (HMPPS) where she has been involved in the development of HMPPS
treatment programmes for sexual offending. Kerensa is a trustee and co-founder of the Safer
Living Foundation (SLF), a charity which sets out to prevent sexual abuse by working with those
who have offended or are at risk of committing a sexual offence.
Jun Sung Hong, PhD, is an Assistant Professor in the School of Social Work at Wayne State
University and an Adjunct Assistant Professor in the Department of Social Welfare at
Sungkyunkwan University in Seoul, South Korea. He is a recipient of the Academy of Scholars
Junior Faculty Award at Wayne State University (2017–2018) and the Alberti Center Early
Career Award at the Alberti Center for Bullying Abuse Prevention (2017–2018). He has
authored numerous peer reviewed articles and book chapters. He is currently on the editorial
boards for the Journal of Family Violence, the Journal of Child and Family Studies, the Journal of Youth
and Adolescence and Psychology of Violence. He is currently a guest editor for the American Journal
of Orthopsychiatry and the Journal of Child and Family Studies. He holds an MSW and a PhD in
Social Work from the University of Michigan and the University of Illinois at Urbana-
Champaign, respectively.
Deborah Horowitz, MSW, is a licensed independent clinical social worker with more than
20 years of experience as a clinician, researcher and educator in the health care field. Currently
a clinical training specialist with the Massachusetts Department of Mental Health, she is the lead
author of Safety, Hope, and Healing (SHH); a curriculum designed to facilitate culture change
around the concepts of trauma, violence and recovery. Ms Horowitz is also the statewide chair
of the First Aid Support Team (FAST) a staff-to-staff tertiary response to workplace trauma and
the companion programme to SHH.
Simon C. Hunter, PhD, works at the University of Strathclyde in Glasgow where he is a Senior
Lecturer in the School of Psychological Sciences and Health, and he is also a Centre for Health
Policy Fellow in the International Public Policy Institute. He is also an Honorary Research
Fellow in the Faculty of Education at the University of Western Australia. Simon earned his
PhD at the University of Strathclyde in 2004, and has since published over 40 peer-reviewed
articles on topics including bullying, atypical development and health. He is also an associate
editor at the British Journal of Developmental Psychology.
Keir Irwin-Rogers is a lecturer in Criminology with The Open University. He has conducted a
range of research on gangs and youth violence and presented his most recent project on gang
violence and online social media activity to the UK Home Office, the National Police Chiefs’
Council and the Youth Justice Board Gangs Forum. Irwin-Rogers has published on a number
of criminal justice-related subjects, including gangs and youth violence, sentencing, community
sanctions and deterrence. He completed a PhD in Criminal Justice at the University of Sheffield
and is currently studying for a BSc in Mathematics and Statistics.
David V. James is a consultant forensic psychiatrist and was formerly a Senior Lecturer in
Forensic Psychiatry at University College London (UCL). He was co-founder of the Fixated
Threat Assessment Centre (FTAC), a novel joint police/National Health Service unit for the
assessment and management of concerning and threatening behaviour towards politicians and
the Royal Family. He was co-founder of the UK’s National Stalking Clinic. He is author or
co-author of 60 papers in the specialist literature and 15 book chapters. He is a co-author of the
Stalking Risk Profile and of the Communications Threat Assessment Protocol. He is currently a director
xix
Contributors
of Theseus LLP, a company which provides an FTAC-style threat management service to private
individuals and institutions.
Roxanne Khan, PhD, is a Senior Lecturer in Forensic Psychology at the University of Central
Lancashire. She is also a Chartered Psychologist and Chartered Scientist, with experience of
working with perpetrators and victims of violence in secure and community settings. Primarily
an aggression researcher, Dr Khan maintains a long-standing research interest in family and
community violence, and this is reflected in her publication profile. She has authored work that
examines intimate partner violence, child and adult sexual abuse, including sexual coercion and
exploitation. Her research interest extends to sibling victimisation and the psychology of
‘honour’-based violence.
Robin Kowalski is a Trevillian Professor of Psychology at Clemson University. She obtained her
PhD in Social Psychology from the University of North Carolina at Greensboro. Her research
interests focus on aversive interpersonal behaviours, most notably complaining and cyberbully-
ing. She is the author or co-author of several books including Complaining, Teasing, and Other
Annoying Behaviors, Aversive Interpersonal Behaviors and Cyber Bullying: Bullying in the Digital Age.
Dr Kowalski has received several awards including Clemson’s Award of Distinction, Clemson’s
College of Business and Behavioral Science Award for Excellence in Undergraduate Teaching,
the Phil Prince Award for Excellence and Innovation in the Classroom and Clemson’s College
of Business and Behavioral Science Senior Research Award. She was a finalist for the 2013 and
2014 South Carolina Governor’s Professor of the Year Awards.
Barbara Krahé is Professor of Social Psychology at the University of Potsdam, Germany. Her
research interests lie in the area of applied social psychology, in particular aggression research
(media violence, sexual aggression) and social cognition research applied to legal decision-
making. She is President-Elect of the International Society for Research on Aggression (ISRA)
and author of the textbook, The Social Psychology of Aggression. She is a fellow of the British
Psychological Society and the Association for Psychological Science and a member of the
Berlin-Brandenburg Academy of Sciences.
Lynn O. Lightfoot is a psychologist in private practice in Oakville, Canada and has worked as
in independent consultant and practitioner for the last 25 years. She has been an adjunct faculty
member at Queen’s University and a Lecturer at the Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.
She is the author of over 50 scientific articles, book chapters, conference proceedings and
government reports in the field of substance abuse. She has specialised in the development and
evaluation of substance abuse treatment programmes for forensic populations that have been
implemented nationally and internationally.
Jan Looman was employed by the Correctional Service of Canada from 1992 until 2015. He
served as the Program Director of the High Intensity Sexual Offender Treatment Program at
the Regional Treatment Centre (Ontario) from 1997 to 2011, and was responsible for that
xx
Contributors
programme’s accreditation in 2002. He then served as the Clinical Manager for the Regional
Treatment Centre (Ontario), a hospital operated by the Correctional Service of Canada until
2015. Currently he is working as a psychologist in the Forensic Mental Health Service of
Providence Care Hospital.
Evan C. McCuish is an Assistant Professor at Simon Fraser University and is the Project Director
of the SSHRC-funded Incarcerated Serious and Violent Young Offender Study, the largest
and longest-running study on young offenders in Canada. His research interests include
criminal careers, desistance, developmental criminology, foster care, gang involvement,
psychopathy, sexual offending and violence. His work is published in the International Journal of
Forensic Mental Health, Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, Justice Quarterly and
Journal of Criminal Justice.
Shelby Elaine McDonald, PhD, is an Assistant Professor in the School of Social Work at Virginia
Commonwealth University (VCU). She received her PhD in Social Work from the University
of Denver. Her research and publications focus on ethnocultural variations in women and
children’s exposure and response to intimate partner violence and human–animal interactions
in the context of welfare, health and socioecological justice. She has a specific interest in the
intersection of children’s exposure to intimate partner violence and concomitant animal cruelty.
Her current research uses advanced person-centred statistical techniques to explore heterogeneity
of adjustment among children who experience polyvictimisation.
Randy J. Nelson is a Distinguished University Professor and holds the Brumbaugh Chair in Brain
Research and Teaching at The Ohio State University. He is also Professor and Chair of the
Department of Neuroscience. Professor Nelson earned his BA and MA degrees at the University
of California, Berkeley. He simultaneously earned a PhD in Psychology and a PhD in
Endocrinology from UC–Berkeley, then conducted postdoctoral research in reproductive
physiology at the University of Texas, Austin. Professor Nelson served on the faculty at The
Johns Hopkins University for 15 years before moving to Columbus. He has published over
xxi
Contributors
400 research articles and several books describing studies in behavioural neuroendocrinology,
biological rhythms and motivated behaviours, especially aggressive behaviours.
Nikola Ninaus graduated with a distinction in the Bachelor of Criminology and Criminal Justice,
School of Social Sciences, University of New South Wales (UNSW), Australia, in 2012. She has
been employed as a research assistant (RA) in the School of Social Sciences and the School of
Psychology at UNSW as well as in the School of Social Sciences and Psychology at Western
Sydney University. In her RA roles, Niki has worked on a range of projects covering various
criminal justice issues including offender management, elderly offenders, housing, mental health
and stalking.
Ioan Ohlsson, PhD, is a Chartered Psychologist, Registered Forensic Psychologist and Associate
Fellow of the British Psychological Society. He currently works in a senior clinical position
within the National Health Service. He was previously one of the lead psychologists working in
a secure forensic mental health hospital. He had input into the assessment and treatment of
psychiatric patients upon admission and during their period of hospitalisation. Dr Ohlsson has
over 14 years’ experience of applied practice and has worked across the lifespan with offenders
in the community and in secure forensic settings. He also works part time at the University of
Central Lancashire, where he teaches on the MSc Psychology programme and supervises
students’ applied research projects. Dr Ohlsson regularly undertakes assessments and delivers
evidence-based interventions with individuals and families who present with histories of violence.
Rebecca Ozanne is a PhD student at the University of Central Lancashire. She is currently a
research associate and trainee forensic psychologist in a secure setting. Rebecca completed her
master’s degree in Forensic Psychology at the University of Central Lancashire. Her research
interests include aggression, child abuse, mental health and trauma.
Dominic J. Parrott, PhD, is a Professor of Psychology at Georgia State University. His research
uses laboratory and survey methods to examine risk factors and mechanisms for aggression
perpetration, with a particular emphasis on the effects of alcohol on intimate partner violence,
aggression toward sexual minorities and sexual aggression. An end goal of his research programme
is to inform directly the development of interventions that prevent or reduce alcohol-related
violence. His work has been funded by the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism
and the Centers for Disease Control.
Debra J. Pepler is Distinguished Research Professor of Psychology, most familiar for her
ongoing research on aggression, bullying and victimisation among children and adolescents.
She also conducts research on children in families at risk through Breaking the Cycle – a
programme for substance-using mothers and their young children. She has co-authored many
books, journal articles, chapters and reports. Together with Dr Wendy Craig, Dr Pepler leads a
federally funded national network, PREVNet (Promoting Relationships and Eliminating
Violence Network) to promote healthy relationships and prevent bullying for children and youth
(www.prevnet.ca).
xxii
Contributors
Craig Pinkney is a Lecturer in Youth, Communities and Families and Gangs Programme Leader
with University College Birmingham. He is director of Real ActionUK, an outreach organisation
based in Birmingham, which specialises in working with disaffected young people. Craig has
over 13 years’ experience as an outreach youth worker, working with some of Birmingham’s
most challenging young people, high-risk offenders and victims of gang violence. He has an MA
in Criminology and specialises in teaching on youth violence, urban street gangs, extremism,
trauma and desistance.
Shannon E. Reid is an Assistant Professor in the Criminal Justice and Criminology Department
at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte. Her main research interests are focused on
gang-involved and trauma-impacted youth and their interactions with the criminal justice
system. Her research has been published in Criminology, Legal and Criminal Psychology, Journal of
Interpersonal Violence, Journal of Criminological Research, Policy and Practice, Deviant Behavior and
Homicide Studies.
xxiii
Contributors
in the workplace and examines its intersection with topics such as diversity, leadership and
cognitive and social psychology. He has published a number of articles in reputable journals such
as The Leadership Quarterly, Human Resource Management and Organizational Psychology Review,
among others.
Lynn A. Stewart is a registered psychologist and academic working most of her career in Canada’s
federal correctional system. Currently she is a senior research manager where she leads applied
research on correctional interventions and women offenders, examining how we can work
effectively to reduce offender recidivism within the criminal justice system. She has published
on issues related to evidence-based practice including correctional programme outcome studies,
domestic violence interventions, indigenous offender specific correctional interventions and
women-specific correctional programmes. Recently she has led research on the mental health
of offenders and its impact on their institutional and community outcomes.
Irena Colakova Veljanova is a Lecturer in Sociology with the School of Social Sciences and
Psychology, Western Sydney University. She has completed her PhD in the field of Human
Welfare Studies and Services. Her research interests include: health sociology, social policy,
ethnic, migration and transnational studies, community health, disability studies, critical
gerontology and community participatory research. Some of her published works include
Health, Agency and Wellbeing and ‘Lifestyle science: Self-healing, co-production and DIY’, Health
Sociology Review.
Jenny S. West is a doctoral student in the Department of Criminology, Law and Society at the
University of California, Irvine. Her research focuses on street gang social networks and group
dynamics, patterns of crime displacement and dispute transformation on social media.
Jennifer Yang is an honours student with Simon Fraser University’s School of Criminology.
Her honours thesis concerns the adult offending outcomes of youth with a history of foster care
placement.
xxiv
Preface
Human aggression: How far have we come?
Jane L. Ireland, Philip Birch and Carol A. Ireland
Monsters exist, but they are too few in number to be truly dangerous. More dangerous are the
common men, the functionaries ready to believe and to act without asking questions.
— Primo Levi (1919–1987)
It is fitting, in the face of the continuing tragedy of human aggression, to commence with an
insightful quote from a survivor of one of the most chilling and horrendous acts of sustained
aggression of our time, the Holocaust. Primo Levi, a renowned chemist, writer and Auschwitz
survivor authored If This Is Man in 1947, recounting his year spent in Auschwitz, driven by a
desire to ensure that the actions of humankind were never forgotten. This was in essence
the importance of the work, to act as a means of capturing events and ensuring that no one
forgets what humans are capable of. Levi also captures the distinction between being ‘human’
and ‘humanity’, with the latter where our potential for peace, empathy and concern as a
species resides.
An ability to recall through generations, past events and the horrors of where aggression has
sought refuge is both a gift and a curse for humans; we can look back at our past actions and
what we have inflicted on others, feel guilt and shame and then try to build our understanding
as to why our potential for inflicting harm through aggression continues.
The answer to this is not straightforward and is captured well by Primo Levi’s comments.
Arguments that aggression is the action of a few damaged or a disordered member of our species
(the ‘Monster’) is not accepted as a sufficient explanation for aggression. Undoubtedly there are
individuals who through genetic predisposition, social/familial influence or both continue to
inflict aggression, but equally there is a potential in all of us to engage in aggression (‘the
common men’), given the right circumstances.
The mechanism by which these circumstances develop and combine with predispositions to
create a fertile environment for aggression is not yet clearly known but there are considerable
in-roads into our understanding. We know, for example, that socially there is more acceptance
of some acts of aggression over others, leading to a minimisation of aggression in some
circumstances and the development of acceptance beliefs. Indirect aggression, where the
intention of the act is unclear and the identity of the aggressor(s) potentially unknown, is a salient
xxv
Preface
example. Yet, who is to determine that ostracising, spreading rumours and/or malicious gossip
(i.e. indirect aggression) is not a concern? It certainly remains so to victims.
We further accept that essentially humans are social animals that do operate well within a
formed group (e.g. family, friendship circles, tribes) and yet we have seen social grouping acting
in a manner that promotes aggression (e.g. gang membership, riots, organised crime syndicates,
terrorist groups). Underpinning the human ability to operate within a social group is our evolved
skill in being able to quickly place individuals into groups. Take, for example, the classic in-group
out-group hostility argument, where humans are thought to be aggressive towards those groups
they consider the out-group, with this aggressive tendency somehow determined by evolution.
Whereas it is certainly the case that out-groups can be targeted and become the victims of
aggression from the in-group, the ability and choice to display aggression towards the out-group
is arguably not part of the evolutionary process; evolution has developed our skill at placing other
humans into groups but not to display aggression towards them. Our ability to consider the use
of aggression towards the out-group is born of other factors, both internal to an individual (e.g.
personality, attribution biases) and external (e.g. environmental factors, such as scarce resources).
Regardless of the debates that can be had, one undefeated acceptance is that human aggression
is a universal behaviour unrestricted by age or sex and one that takes a number of different
forms, appearing across a range of contexts. It is not inevitable, but it is a behaviour all are
capable of engaging in. Consequently, it is a topic that continues to fascinate scholars and
practitioners interested in understanding aggression, in reducing its occurrence and in trying to
limit the effects.
There have been significant advances made in the last 60 years with regards to how we
conceptualise, assess and treat aggression. For example, there has been a move away from
focusing purely on more direct forms of aggression that are easily defined (e.g. physical, sexual,
verbal) to the subtler forms of indirect aggression. Certain areas that have seen considerable
development in the last 15 years include relationship and family violence, our understanding
of gang-related control and aggression and also sexual violence. More recently there has been
increased consideration and acceptance of gender-neutral understandings of aggression, leading
to more consideration of aggression by women. The use of the term human and not mankind
is adopted here for this very reason.
There has also been a move away from combining antisocial behaviour and aggression as if
they were shared concepts, which can lead to an over-focus on criminalised aggression. This is an
essential point to draw out – since when was aggression considered criminalised? There are many
arguments that can be developed to support the adaptive (and non-criminal) element of
aggression; humans are clearly the dominant species on Earth and therefore the most successful.
Aggression has not, however, been phased out from our evolution so it must clearly retain an
adaptive purpose and cannot be described universally as ‘maladaptive’. It is without doubt that
some societies use aggression less than others but regardless of this aggression is retained.
The answer concerning the criminalisation of aggression perhaps lies in how human society
has developed and where they have drawn moral lines concerning what is and what is not
acceptable aggression; assaulting someone in the context of anger is legally and morally wrong,
but what of a parent defending their child physically against an adult who is intent on causing
their child physical harm? Legally the issue would focus on defensive aggression and the
proportionality of the reaction to the aggression displayed in order to determine criminal action,
but morally is such aggression deemed acceptable? Most likely yes by the ‘common men [sic]’.
Indeed, it is the moral judgement of humankind that has perhaps become the true judge of the
acceptability or otherwise of human aggression. The moral lines evolve along with societies’
development. Take, for example, the following reference to the value of duels:
xxvi
Preface
A man may shoot the man who invades his character, as he may shoot him who attempts to break
into his house.
—Samuel Johnson (1709–1784)
Making duels illegal acts is barely 100 years old in some locations and they were often attended
by hundreds of spectators. Their aim was to prove courage and settle arguments. They were also
conducted with their own codes and designated equipment. They occurred when there was a
view that Courts were unable to provide justice. One of the most notable duels was likely that
between the US vice-president, Aaron Burr, and a political opponent, Alexander Hamilton, in
1804 that led to the latter being killed. The thought of resolving such political matters through
an act of aggression in this manner would draw clear disdain and condemnation where words
are now preferred. Equally though, political disputes are clearly still sometimes resolved through
aggression (e.g. war, riots) whereas the notion of one individual being allowed to murder an
opponent with the blessing of society through the act of a duel is seemingly not.
Our Courts certainly now act as the arena where alleged infringements on character are
settled, allowing for action to be taken through other routes (e.g. slander, libel action). Equally,
individuals may pursue to correct character damage through other means such as social media
(e.g. tweeting retorts, blogging defences), all of which introduce the potential for arguably more
subtle aggression (e.g. harassment) but would not equate to the social acceptance for killing or
seriously injuring someone that was part of a duel.
But of course, the question is then how much have we really evolved? We may not engage
in socially accepted events such as duels, but we still settle infringements on character through
aggressive means but in a more uncontrolled fashion:
Certainly dueling is bad, and has been put down, but not quite so bad as its substitute — revolvers,
bowie knives, blackguarding, and street assassinations under the pretext of self-defense.
—Colonel Benton (1782–1858)
Interestingly, the increasing lack of acceptance of duels is considered in part to have coincided
with wars where many young men were lost, leading to society becoming less tolerant of the
further loss of young men. One could speculate here that acts of mass violence (i.e. war) were
actually indirectly adaptive in preventing some forms of individual violence by allowing humans
to protect a valuable reproductive asset; young men.
The last 30 years of aggression research have certainly seen more focus on trying to understand
how we can understand and define aggression across time, focusing more on the function that
this behaviour serves, both at an individual and societal level. It has also led to increased
consideration of specific groups that utilise aggression (e.g. gangs, terrorist groups), with
developed academic interest into these areas advancing considerably in the last decade.
Nevertheless, there is increased acceptance that this is not a topic restricted to ‘special groups’
and the ‘monsters’ that Primo Levi refers to, but rather aggression is a common issue not
restricted by population.
Of great importance is that no matter how much evolutionary success a species has, behaviours
that serve an adaptive purpose will remain. Aggression is arguably one such example of this and
our interest in trying to understand it will continue. The first step in achieving this may be to
place a hold temporarily on moral judgements of aggression since morality is a human condition.
Whether all humans wish to accept it or not we remain animals, part of a larger kingdom of
animals, animals that willfully use aggression for adaptive purposes without the gift of moral
judgement or empathic concern towards others or wider society. When a cat attacks a mouse,
xxvii
Preface
it is not considering the moral judgement of its actions but perhaps enjoying the base level
pleasure that is to be gained physiologically from aggression; humans, however, may seek
sometimes to remove themselves from other animals and vilify those that engage in aggression as
‘beasts’, ‘animals’ or ‘barbarians’. However, without ‘barbaric’ actions at some point along our
evolutionary development it would be difficult to see how humans could have advanced across
lands and secured resources from others. Nevertheless, we have a tendency to redraft ourselves
as ‘modern’ and not ‘barbaric’ but this does not absolve us of our responsibility to accept that we
will continue to use aggression and it will continue to have adaptive components for us.
Of course, with advanced cognitive development and a well-honed sense of self and others,
humans are certainly allowed to distance themselves from other animals, but not to the point
where we fail to recognise that aggressive potential is within all animals, regardless of our
evolutionary success in adaptation. Indeed, this is captured well by Primo Levi again who notes
the importance of remembering our capabilities for aggression:
We must be listened to: above and beyond our personal experience, we have collectively witnessed
a fundamental unexpected event, fundamental precisely because unexpected, not foreseen by
anyone. It happened, therefore it can happen again: this is the core of what we have to say. It can
happen, and it can happen everywhere.
—Primo Levi (1919–1987)
The Routledge International Handbook of Human Aggression simply serves to highlight our
understanding of aggression by focusing on one of the most interesting species in this regard –
humans. It seeks to outline how aggression can be enacted and judged by humans and human
societies, and how we can perhaps further our continued evolutionary adaption towards more
peaceful actions in circumstances where our aggression is not the most or only adaptive choice.
Human aggression is clearly, therefore, a topic of broad appeal with much left to study and
understand regarding its development, maintenance and resolution. The need to capture the
developments we have made in a text that covers the breadth of contexts where aggression
occurs is consequently essential. The Routledge International Handbook of Human Aggression seeks
to do this by presenting current opinions on core aspects of relevance to the field that will serve,
we hope, as an up-to-date resource for academics and practitioners working in this area. It aims
to achieve this through five sections, four that build around general and core areas of developed
study and practice (i.e. understandings of general aggression; bullying across contexts; relationship
and family violence; sexual aggression) and one capturing more contemporary issues of topical
interest such as understanding and appreciating victim responses, considering gang membership,
media influence and terrorist activities.
The ultimate aim of the Routledge International Handbook of Human Aggression is to promote
thoughtful reflection and a critical review of the field to allow us to continue our growth of
knowledge concerning how humankind can engage in aggression and/or allow aggression to
occur.
References
Levi, P. (1947). If This Is Man. Originally published by De Silva and translated into English in 1959. [See also
Levi, P. (2005). The Black Hole of Auschwitz. Edited by Marco Belpoliti, Translated by Sharon Wood.
Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.]
Samuel Johnson quote: see Krystal, A. (2007). ‘En Garde! The history of duelling’, March 12. New Yorker.
www.newyorker.com/magazine/2007/03/12 accessed 9 June 2017.
Colonel Benton quote: see ‘Duel and dueling’, The Encyclopedia Americana (1920). Chicago, IL.
xxviii
Section I
Understanding general aggression
1
The development of aggression in
childhood and adolescence
A focus on relationships
Debra J. Pepler
Research on the development of aggression highlights the central role of relationships in shaping
development. Children learn almost everything about themselves, others, and the world through
their experiences in relationships (National Scientific Council on the Developing Child, 2004).
When children’s relationships fail to support their social-emotional development, aggressive
behaviour patterns become consolidated and sustained across time and settings. Emerging
research reveals the complex ways in which children’s experiences become embedded in their
biology. Therefore, to understand the development of aggression, we need a binocular perspec-
tive, integrating one lens focused on individual children’s development and another lens focused
on the way in which others interact with children, creating the context for development (Pepler,
2006). This chapter starts with a consideration of the biological foundations for children’s devel-
opment, followed by a focus on the role of relationships in the development of aggression.
Observational and other research sheds light on what does and does not develop in the contexts
of the family, peer group, and school. The focus on relationships provides a window into the
complex and dynamic mechanisms that shape the development of aggression.
3
Debra J. Pepler
contexts, such as the family, children do not actively choose their relationships. In other contexts,
such as the peer group, children are freer to choose – and tend to gravitate to people, activities,
and settings where they have positive rather than aversive experiences (Snyder, 2002). The social
development model specifies that strong social bonds and positive social development occur
when children and youth are raised with positive interactions, positive involvement, adequate
skills, and reinforcements for positive behaviours (Catalano & Hawkins, 1996). From an
evolutionary perspective, aggression can be adaptive for youth who are skilled in using it to
obtain goals with relatively little personal or interpersonal cost (Volk, Camilleri, Dane & Marini,
2012). These individuals are often bi-strategic in using both prosocial and aggressive strategies
to maintain dominance and status (Hawley & Vaughn, 2003). Varying theoretical perspectives
call into question aggression as a stable trait and suggest diverse pathways in the development of
aggression that depend, in part, on the social context in which aggression is exhibited.
4
The development of aggression
involved in sustaining the effects of negative parenting. Mother–child dyads were followed over
15 years from middle childhood to adolescence and early adulthood. They found significant
associations between changes in offsprings’ perception of rejecting parenting from middle
childhood to adulthood and DNA methylation in the offsprings’ adult genomes. The findings
suggest that changes in methylation, which turns genes on or off, may be a mechanism linking
negative parenting and offsprings’ adaptation.
Research on gene–environment interactions highlights how children’s genetic vulnerability
can be exacerbated by challenging relationships. Liu, Li and Guo (2014) conducted a meta-
analysis of gene environment interactions in the development of delinquency and violence. They
found that genetic contributions to delinquency and violence could be explained by an environ-
mental triggering or suppressing process: when youth grow up in adverse social conditions, there
is a larger genetic contribution to the development of delinquency and violence. Conversely,
when youth grow up in favourable conditions with stronger attachments and social controls,
there is a smaller contribution by the genes linked to delinquency and violence.
Temperament has long been considered key in the development of aggression (Loeber &
Hay, 1997). Problems emerging in the first weeks and months of life can set up patterns of
interaction that persist through relationships and across contexts. For example, infants with
difficult temperaments are difficult to soothe and tend to be highly reactive. These children
present challenges for parents’ attempts to regulate and manage their behaviours. Vitaro and
colleagues found that a difficult temperament in infancy was positively related to reactive
aggression in kindergarten (Vitaro, Barker, Boivin, Brendgen & Trembley, 2006). In addition,
harsh parenting was related to the development of both reactive and proactive aggression.
Emerging research is clarifying how children’s experiences in relationships shape genetic
expression, which is integrally and dynamically linked to brain development (Meloni, 2014).
When children live in a chaotic or non-nurturing environment it can disrupt brain development,
neuronal functioning, and connectivity, which in turn may underlie the propensity to be
aggressive (Lösel & Farrington, 2012). Given the plasticity of development, these neural
disruptions can be ameliorated. In a study of aggressive children referred to the SNAP® program
(Stop Now and Plan program), Lewis and colleagues (2008) found that their brain activation
differed from that of non-aggressive children in the ventral and dorsal regions indicating poorer
executive functioning. Following treatment, children with behavioural improvements also
showed brain activity that was similar to the non-aggressive children, suggesting increased func-
tioning and connectivity had developed through the program. Both aggressive children and their
parents participate in the program and learn regulation and problem-solving skills; therefore,
changes may emerge simultaneously in the children, parents, and family context.
5
Debra J. Pepler
behaviours. Research suggests that children require these forms of adult support across all contexts
(e.g., day-care, schools, community organisations, sports). In a review of protective processes,
Lösel and Farrington concluded that: “an emotionally warm, attentive, accepting, norm-oriented
supervising and structure-giving upbringing encourages the positive development of children”
(2012, p. S14). They note that these positive practices, which align with Baumrind’s model, also
mitigate the development of violence in the face of risk. Drawing from research on children’s
relationships across family, peer, and school contexts, we can begin to piece together a picture
of how relationship experiences accumulate to undermine healthy development and divert
children onto aggressive developmental pathways. As Dodge and colleagues (2009) noted, the
combination of child vulnerabilities and adverse social contexts sets up a developmental cascade
of failure and risk for antisocial and illegal behaviours. In the following section, the mechanisms
through which this developmental cascade occurs are considered.
6
The development of aggression
studied parents’ relational schemas regarding how they understand and react to their children’s
behaviours. With a negative schema, parents interpret children as purposefully provoking or
resisting them. Parents’ negative schemas were linked to coercive parent–child dynamics and to
children’s oppositional and aggressive behaviours five and six years later in middle childhood.
These findings suggest that when parents lack positive orientations in relationships with their
children, children become non-compliant and develop aggressive behaviour problems, perhaps
as a function of their own negative relational schemas. Trentacosta and Shaw (2008) found that
the effects of early parent–child relationship problems are long lasting: rejecting parenting in early
childhood predicted antisocial behaviour in early adolescence.
Peer processes. Children are positively motivated to interact with peers even when they have
weak family attachments. In observations on the school playground, we found that aggressive
children initiated more interactions with their peers than non-aggressive children (Pepler, Craig
& Roberts, 1998). Contrary to expectations, aggressive children spent as much time as non-
aggressive children interacting with peers. Conversely, peers were equally interactive with
aggressive and non-aggressive children; however, aggressive children were more likely to respond
antisocially to peer initiations. In adolescence, aggressive youth tend to have friends with similar
antisocial attitudes and behaviours, leading to increases in antisocial behaviour through deviancy
training (Dishion, Spracklen, Andrews & Patterson, 1996). A similar process occurs as aggressive
youth seek romantic partners: both boys and girls who bully start dating earlier and are more
advanced in dating than non-bullying adolescents (Connolly, Pepler, Craig & Taradash, 2000).
Youth who bullied, however, view their friends and romantic partners less positively and equi-
tably than non-bullying youth (Connolly et al., 2000). In the case of peer relationships, therefore,
a positive orientation to peers may promote and maintain the development of aggression, rather
than mitigate it.
Although aggressive children may be eager to belong in a peer group, they are frequently
rejected by peers – their disruptive behaviours make it difficult for peers to like and play with
them. Aggressive children are frequently rejected by unfamiliar peers (Dodge, 1983). Their
physically and verbally aggressive behaviour, exclusion of peers, and inappropriate play may elicit
peer disliking. As with reciprocal effects in parent–child interactions – children’s aggression
exacerbates peer relationship problems and peer relationship problems exacerbate aggressive
children’s dysregulation and negative relationship schemas. When rejected, aggressive children
tend to drift to the margins of the social group, where they are accepted by other aggressive and
rejected children. Within this peer context, they tend to develop increasingly troublesome
behaviours through deviancy training (Dodge, Dishion & Lansford, 2006).
School processes. Aggressive children are generally unprepared for the academic, behavioural,
and social demands of school, leading to a range of problems. Aggressive children begin to
develop strained relationships with teachers starting at school entry and increasing over the
school year (Doumen et al., 2008). If students are not engaged with school and attached to
teachers, they tend to struggle academically, as well as socially, morally, and behaviourally
(Kuperminc, Leadbeater & Blatt, 2001). Aggressive behaviour problems may be both the cause
and consequence of weak bonds to school (Hoffman, Erickson & Spence, 2013). When students
are disengaged, their negative orientation may foster strained relationships with school staff and
peers alike. When teachers have a low preference for students, it leads not only to declining
grades, but also to increased loneliness at school (Mercer & DeRosier, 2008). The experiences
of being rejected by both staff and students may underlie youths’ disengagement. There is
mounting evidence that the process of disengagement starts at school entry and comprises the
primary developmental process that underlies antisocial behaviour, school failure, and dropout
rates (Hirschfeld & Gasper, 2011).
7
Debra J. Pepler
8
The development of aggression
(Pepler et al., 1998). They exhibit more mixed behaviours in which they initiate an aggressive
(or prosocial) behaviour, fail to wait for a response, and immediately switch to a prosocial (or
aggressive) behaviour directed at a peer. With unpredictable switches between prosocial and
aggressive behaviours, classmates likely perceive aggressive children as difficult. Given aggressive
children’s dysregulated interactional style, other children may actively avoid playing with them,
eliciting subsequent feelings of rejection and shame that further compromise the development
of emotional and behavioural regulation.
As children move into peer relationships and school, their difficulties in these contexts can
further exacerbate anxiety in social interactions. Granic and Lougheed (2016) contend that when
children experience contempt from peers and subsequent shame, they often react with anger and
aggression. These reactive behaviours can serve to override distressing emotions of anxiety
and shame, thereby mitigating the development of emotional and behavioural regulation.
School processes. School readiness comprises three domains: emotional self-regulation, social
competence, and family/school involvement (Webster-Stratton, Jamila Reid & Stoolmiller,
2008). When children enter school, there are new, explicit expectations for emotional and
behavioural regulation. Children who exhibit aggressive behaviour upon school entry often lack
regulatory capacities for sustained attention and behavioural control, which are essential for
academic success. Aggressive children tend to be disruptive and engage in bullying behaviours
in the classroom (Atlas & Pepler, 1998). These troublesome behaviours may elicit increased
negative attention from both teachers and their classmates. For aggressive children at school, as
in the home, negative attention may be more reinforcing than no attention at all.
When children are genetically vulnerable to be aggressive, they are at increased risk for
relationship problems at school. Brendgen and colleagues (2011) found that children who were
genetically vulnerable to be aggressive were at risk of being victimised by their peers. Their
relationships with teachers moderated peer relationships. When aggressive children had posi-
tive relationships with teachers, they were less likely to be victimised by peers; when they had
high conflict and low closeness with teachers, they were more likely to be victimised by peers.
Brendgen and colleagues raised concern for the transactional nature of these relationship dynamics.
Children’s genetic vulnerability to be aggressive can elicit victimisation from peers, which may
lead to more aggression, creating vicious cycles of increasing mutual aggression between
vulnerable children and their peers.
There is growing evidence that experiences of victimisation can lead to bullying. Without
adequate emotional and behavioural regulation, children may be highly reactive when bullied,
which can lead to further victimisation and reactivity. We found a sequential relationship
between aggression and victimisation: when youth started to be victimised, they started to
become aggressive and bully others (Goldbaum, Craig, Pepler & Connolly, 2003). Children who
are chronically victimised may model aggressive strategies from those whom they view as more
powerful. Furthermore, they may begin to bully as a way of coping with the anxiety and hostility
elicited by being victimised.
9
Debra J. Pepler
Family processes. Children growing up in dysfunctional families, with few models of prosocial
behaviour and positive problem solving, will learn what they live. Living with inter-parental
violence and child maltreatment are two cogent and stressful experiences that impact children.
Gustafsson and colleagues (2014) examined the relative influence of inter-parental violence and
physical maltreatment on children’s behaviour problems at school entry. They found that both
types of family violence had a unique negative influence on children’s functioning. It is likely
that both the modeling and the stress that children experience through family violence undermine
the development of prosocial behaviour and positive problem solving.
Ineffective problem solving often arises from inflexibility and negative dynamics. Granic and
colleagues assessed the problem-solving of mothers and aggressive children before and following
the SNAP® program (Granic, O’Hara, Pepler & Lewis, 2007). They compared dyads in which
children improved through treatment with those who did not improve. After treatment, dyads
in the non-improved group failed to show increases in flexible problem-solving, but increased in
time spent “stuck” in one emotional state. Although dyads in the improved group still expressed
negative emotions, they acquired skills to repair conflicts and to shift from negative interactions
to mutually positive patterns. In a complementary study assessing changes in aggressive children
through the SNAP® program, Lewis and colleagues (2008) found that children who had improved
through treatment showed a reduction in ventral prefrontal activation at the time when inhibitory
control was required. They speculated that for aggressive children with comorbid anxiety, the
anxiety-related mechanisms may be primary, with aggressive behaviour modulating anxiety.
With strained relationships, children may be unmotivated to interact prosocially and posi-
tively. Many have noted that children’s motivation to meet adults’ expectations depends on the
quality of their relationships. Kochanska and colleagues found that mothers’ responsiveness to
their children was linked to their children’s willingness to comply with requests (Kochanska,
Kim, Boldt & Yoon, 2013). When adults are attuned, children may have a sense of being rele-
vant and valued; therefore, respond appropriately to sustain adults’ positive regard. McKinnon
(2008) has written about this dynamic in his clinical work with substance-addicted youth. He
noted that until youth know that you “recognise”, value, and understand them, they are resistant
to clinical guidance.
Peer processes. Peer interactions can contribute to the lag in acquiring prosocial behaviours and
problem solving. Our observations of bullying provide evidence for peer dynamics that promote
aggressive behaviours, rather than prosocial ones. We found that peers were present in 85 per cent
of bullying episodes and they spent 75 per cent of the time paying attention to the child who was
bullying (Craig & Pepler, 1997). Peers played an active role in exacerbating aggression: when
a peer joins in bullying, the child who initiated the bullying becomes increasingly aggressive
and aroused (O’Connell, Pepler & Craig, 1999). Furthermore, negative peer influences are
bi-directional: bystanders are more likely to join bullying when incited by the child who initially
bullied (O’Connell, Pepler & Craig, 1999). In these ways, peers fail to contribute to prosocial
behaviours and are highly reinforcing of aggressive behaviours.
Peers tend to respond negatively toward aggressive children. Because aggressive children
initiate aggression more frequently than non-aggressive children, they are on the receiving end
of retaliation more often than peers (Pepler et al., 1998). Hence, aggressive children’s peer
interactions not only elicit and maintain antisocial behaviours, but also fail to promote prosocial
behaviours. At the margins of the peer group, aggressive children have restricted opportunities to
be with prosocial peers. Instead, they interact with other marginalised peers, who also tend
to be aggressive and disruptive. Having aggressive friends creates problems: youth who maintained
high levels of bullying over elementary and high school were significantly more likely than non-
bullying students to have friends who also bullied (Pepler, Jiang, Craig & Connolly, 2008).
10
The development of aggression
Similarly, Adams and colleagues found that highly aggressive children who had an aggressive
friend remained aggressive during the following year. Conversely, those who were initially
aggressive and had non-aggressive friends were less likely to be aggressive in the following year
(Adams, Bukowski & Bagwell, 2005). These findings are consistent with deviancy training
among aggressive children, but also suggest that non-aggressive friends can help promote the
development of prosocial behaviour and positive problem solving.
In their seminal review of negative peer influences, Dishion, McCord and Poulin (1999)
concluded that high-risk youth are susceptible to deviancy training with peers and that friendships
among deviant peers predict increases in delinquency, substance use, violence, and maladjustment
in adulthood. They highlighted two deviancy training mechanisms: problem behaviours increase
when youth are reinforced for deviant behaviour by peers; high-risk youth come to value
deviance and become increasingly motivated to engage in problem behaviour.
School processes. For children who have not developed prosocial behaviours and positive
problem solving, society depends on schools to be the socialising institutions and pick up where
parents left off. Children who lag in social-emotional development are at risk, not only because
of their deficits in a wide range of communication, social, and cognitive capacities, but also
because of the ways that others interact with them, further constraining them to a troubled
pathway.
Aggressive, disruptive and non-compliant children are difficult to teach and manage. When
teachers are not highly attuned to the needs of challenging children and mindful of their own
responses to these children, it may be especially difficult to support prosocial development. As
Boyce and colleagues (2012) have shown, teachers’ child-centred practices buffer the psychosocial
difficulties of children who are vulnerable. When teachers create supportive classroom climates
for vulnerable children, the deleterious effects of being marginalised within the peer group are
mitigated. These findings led Boyce and colleagues to call for “more supportive, egalitarian, and
generous social environments” (2012, p. 17171). In contrast, when teachers actively model low
liking of aggressive students, other classmates increase in their dislike and rejection of aggressive
students (Mercer & DeRosier, 2008). When actively rejected, aggressive children have few
opportunities and reinforcements to respond prosocially and effectively when confronted with
social problems. If aggressive children are further marginalised by being removed from mainstream
classrooms and aggregated in special “behavioural” classes, deviancy training tends to flourish
and students’ problem behaviours are exacerbated (Dodge et al., 2006).
As leaders in the classroom, teachers shape the social climate and students’ relationships. If the
classroom climate is negative, aggressive children may struggle to develop positive peer
relationships and the requisite social skills. In a longitudinal study, Sprott (2004) found that youth
who developed violent behaviours during early adolescence had often been in elementary school
classrooms with limited emotional support from teachers and classmates. School relationships,
however, can be protective and supportive for students with troubled family relationships if these
students can become engaged and develop a positive attitude and attachment to school (Sprott,
Jenkins & Doob, 2005).
11
Debra J. Pepler
and school that may undermine aggressive children’s development of understanding and concern
for others.
Family processes. Dysfunctional family processes contribute to the development of a hostile
social-cognitive style (Dodge, 2006). In the early years, if attachment processes are disruptive,
children fail to develop trust and mutually positive interactions. With harsh punishment and
maltreatment, children learn that others cannot be relied on to interact positively, so they come
to expect hostile interactions. In these dynamics, parents not only model aggression, but may
also express hostile attributions about their children’s behaviours. Through ongoing hostile
interactions within the family, children come to interpret parents’ behaviours as arising from
hostile intent and then transfer these attributions to the behaviours of others. Longitudinal
research reveals that hostile attributional biases, developed in the early years at home, are linked
to aggressive behaviour problems many years later in school (Dodge, Pettit, Bates & Valente,
1995). It follows that if children learn that others are likely to be hostile, they tend to react with
hostility and aggression.
Moral understanding and concern for the impact of one’s behaviours on others develop
through childhood and adolescence. In the early years, children’s behaviours are regulated by
the expectations of adults. If they are raised with consistent modelling and expectations of what
is right and wrong, they come to understand these standards and behave accordingly (Bandura,
1999). In dysfunctional families with harsh parenting, inconsistent reinforcement patterns, and
limited scaffolding for social understanding, children lack critical building blocks for moral
reasoning and behaviour. As Bandura has described, moral disengagement develops when
children learn to: (1) justify their hurtful behaviour, (2) ignore or minimise the consequences of
their hurtful behaviour, and (3) attribute blame to the person whom they have hurt. As discussed
in the peer section next, the lack of understanding and concern for others can lead to bullying
and problems in peer relationships.
Children who live with inter-parental violence may learn that interpersonal aggression is both
justifiable and acceptable. In a study of children living in a shelter following exposure to intimate
partner violence, Jouriles and colleagues (2014) found that children’s beliefs about the justifiabil-
ity of aggression were positively associated over time with aggressive behaviour problems.
Children’s fears and worries about their mothers’ conflict with intimate partners also related to
their aggressive behaviour problems. Whereas some mothers are able to maintain positive par-
enting, others struggle under the burden of abuse. If abused mothers report frequently using
insults with their children, their children are three times more likely to have serious clinical
problems than children whose mothers never used insults (Moore & Pepler, 2006). When chil-
dren are chronically exposed to the stress of inter-parental hostility, they may be particularly
vulnerable to their mothers’ disparaging comments, leading to insecurity, self-blame, and acting
out behaviours.
Peer processes. In his early research on aggressive children’s social cognitive processes, Dodge
(1980) created scenarios in which a peer’s intent could be interpreted as hostile, benign, or
ambivalent. Compared to non-aggressive children, aggressive children interpreted ambivalent
behaviour as more hostile. Observations of aggressive children’s peer interactions suggest that
their tendency to infer hostile intent may reflect their lived experiences, which are relatively
more hostile than those of their non-aggressive peers. Although peers did not respond
differentially to the antisocial behaviours of aggressive and non-aggressive children, aggressive
children initiated more antisocial behaviours and, therefore, received more antisocial responses
(Pepler et al., 1998). Negative peer interaction dynamics on the school playground may
contribute to an understanding that aggression is one of the hazards of everyday life and useful
as a means for interpreting and solving social problems.
12
The development of aggression
When children lack understanding of others, they may be less able to synchronise their
behaviours within the peer group, adding to their peer relationship difficulties. In a longitudinal
study of the development of aggressive behaviour problems between grades 4 and 8, Ettekal and
Ladd (2015) found that children who were consistently high on both relational and physical
aggression had the most strained peer relationships, with few reciprocated friends and a high
likelihood of being rejected by peers. They noted that these children may have had social-
cognitive and emotional deficits. Without being able to interpret how peers perceived them and
adjust accordingly, they continued to behave aggressively to an extent that was not accepted by
peers. Ettekal and Ladd (2015) inferred that these children were not using aggression strategically
and beneficially. Furthermore, aggressive children’s peer relationships worsened over time, with
decreasing friendships and increasing levels of peer rejection, suggesting the bi-directional
relationship processes that cumulatively constrain aggressive children on a troubled pathway.
For aggressive children, the experience of being increasingly marginalised and isolated in
the peer group may contribute to their lack of social attunement and synchrony. Building on
Dodge’s research on hostile attributions, Downey and colleagues examined whether negative
attributions are motivated by children’s expectations of rejection by peers. They identified
“rejection sensitivity” as the defensive tendency to expect, readily interpret, and overreact to
social rejection (Downey, Lebolt, Rincón & Freitas, 1998). Over time, children who were
sensitive to rejection increased in disruptive, oppositional, and conflict behaviour. These children
had difficulties with both peers and teachers with increasing absences, suspensions, and disen-
gagement from school, as well as poorer grades. Aggressive children appear to develop a
hypervigilant and hostile perspective of those in their proximal environments, which arises from
their experiences within relationships.
Aggressive children may also develop strategies to disengage morally from their own hurtful
behaviours. Both Menesini and colleagues (2003) and Hymel and colleagues (2005) have shown
that children who bully reason with some of the moral disengagement strategies identified by
Bandura (1999). They are more likely to justify their hurtful behaviour by minimising personal
advantages (Menesini et al., 2003) and attribute blame to the person whom they have hurt
(Hymel, Rocke-Henderson & Bonanno, 2005). Bandura (1999) noted that the process of moral
disengagement is gradual; however, a consideration of the bi-directional peer processes that
marginalise and alienate aggressive children sheds light on the potential social and cognitive
mechanisms that underlie the entrenchment of aggressive behaviour problems.
School processes. As indicated previously, children who develop aggressive problems over the
early years may lag in their understanding and concern for others. At school entry, there is an
expectation that children will be ready not only academically, but also socially and emotionally.
Although schools provide systematic scaffolding for the development of literacy and numeracy
skills, the inclusion of specific supports for social-emotional learning is just beginning (Collaborative
for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning: CASEL, 2015). Without essential regulation,
attentional, and social skills, children with aggressive behaviours are likely to experience repeated
failure in both academic and social spheres. In contrast to their peers who move through school
relatively smoothly, children who lack the capacities for school performance fall increasingly
behind. With experiences of failure in these important life tasks, aggressive children are less likely
to become engaged not only in their studies, but also in protective relationships with teachers
and peers.
The process of disengaging from school cognitively, emotionally, and behaviourally unfolds
gradually over the school years. In a study examining engagement, delinquency, and school
dropout, Wang and Fredricks (2014) found that dropping out of school is predicted by lower
behavioural and emotional engagement and higher problem behaviours. As a result, the most
13
Debra J. Pepler
vulnerable youth in society become truant and eventually drop out of school. The process of
disengagement leading to truancy and dropout is dynamic, bi-directional, and embedded in the
relationships at school. In a study of school leavers, Ferguson and colleagues (2005) found that
relationships figured prominently in students’ perceptions of why they dropped out of school.
Many youths who had dropped out reported receiving both direct and indirect messages from
principals, vice-principals, teachers, and guidance counsellors indicating that they were not
wanted in the school. Relationships with other students were also strained and perceived as
contributing to the process of disengagement. According to Ferguson and colleagues (2005),
“young people described troubled school cultures due to severe and ongoing bullying and
violence. When these issues were not clearly and swiftly addressed, students began the process
of skipping school, detentions, suspensions and early leaving” (p. 27). Given that children with
aggressive behaviour problems drift to the margins of the peer network, where they associate
with other marginalised children, it is not surprising that they develop hostile attributions about
their school experiences.
Conclusion
This chapter has aimed to build an understanding of the complex and dynamic processes that
contribute to the development of aggressive behaviour problems. Biological and social processes
interact inseparably to shape the development of aggression. With an increasingly comprehensive
understanding of the individual and relationship processes that contribute to the development
of aggressive behaviour problems, a critical question is what can be done to prevent and address
these problems. Interventions have come a long way in the last 30 years. In the 1980s, aggressive
children were perceived as “deficient in many of the social and social-cognitive skills required
for successful peer interactions” (Pepler, King & Byrd, 1991, p. 361); therefore, interventions
focused only on children to ‘fill them up’ with skills they were lacking. Current evidence-based
interventions for children with aggressive behaviour problems, such as the Stop Now and Plan
program (SNAP®; Augimeri et al., 2007) are developmental, systemic, and relational. There is a
widespread understanding that to sustain any improvement through treatment, changes in
developmental contexts and processes are essential.
Kazdin (1997) identified parent training as the most effective means of intervening with
aggressive children. The question then arises: Whose responsibility is it to support families in
effective child rearing and how is this best done? Many parents of aggressive children grew up
in strained and stressful families and lacked models of positive nurturing. If society failed them
by not providing safe and supportive contexts for their development, does the responsibility now
rest with society to support those who are struggling to raise healthy children? With a growing
understanding of how aggressive behaviour problems develop, there has been an increased focus
on the role of healthy relationships in promoting healthy development. In their article on the
critical role of nurturing environments for promoting human well-being, Biglan and colleagues
(2012) identified five communication and marketing strategies for broad social-cultural change.
These include:
14
The development of aggression
In Canada, the author and colleagues have worked collectively within a multi-sector national
network (Promoting Relationships to Eliminate Violence Network, PREVNet www.prevnet.
ca) to mobilise efforts that align with these five strategies for social change (Pepler et al., in press).
We have indications that our nationwide collaborative efforts over the past 10 years are beginning
to prevent and address aggressive behaviour problems: the proportion of students who report
bullying others has decreased by 62 per cent and the proportion of students who report both
bullying others and being victimised has dropped by 44 per cent. The proportion of students
who report being victimised, however, has increased by 16 per cent over this time (Craig, Lambe
& McIver, 2016).
A focus on relationships highlights the potential moment-to-moment experiences in the lives
of children with aggressive behaviour problems that either engage and support their positive
development or accumulate to alienate them and enable them to drift away from potentially
protective relationships. Over the past few decades there have been great strides in research and
practice related to the development of aggression and the rates of youth violence have decreased.
Nevertheless, there are children and youth in society who are vulnerable and often very
challenging. These are the children who need to be identified early and supported across all
contexts in their lives, with both nurturance and guidance to promote their social-emotional
development and their capacity to engage in healthy relationships for healthy development
through the lifespan.
References
Adams, R. E., Bukowski, W. M., and Bagwell, C. (2005). ‘Stability of aggression during early adolescence
as moderated by reciprocated friendship status and friend’s aggression’. International Journal of Behavioural
Development, 29: 139–145.
Atlas, R. and Pepler, D. J. (1998). ‘Observations of bullying in the classroom’. American Journal of Educational
Research, 92: 86–99.
Augimeri, L. K., Farrington, D. P., Koegl, C. J., and Day, D. M. (2007). ‘The SNAP® Under 12 Outreach
Project: Effects of a community based program for children with conduct problems’. Journal of Child and
Family Studies, 16: 799–807.
Bandura, A. (1999). ‘Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities’. Personality and Social
Psychology Review, 3: 193–209.
Baumrind, D. (1991). ‘The influence of parenting style on adolescent competence and substance use’. The
Journal of Early Adolescence, 11: 56–95.
Becht, A. I., Prinzie, P., Deković, M., Van den Akker, A. L., and Shiner, R. L. (2016). ‘Child personality
facets and overreactive parenting as predictors of aggression and rule-breaking trajectories from
childhood to adolescence’. Development and Psychopathology, 28: 399–413.
Biglan, A., Flay, B. R., Embry, D. D., and Sandler, I. N. (2012). ‘The critical role of nurturing environments
for promoting human well-being’. American Psychologist, 67: 257.
Boyce, W. T., Obradović, J., Bush, N. R., Stamperdahl, J., Kim, Y. S., and Adler, N. (2012). ‘Social
stratification, classroom climate, and the behavioral adaptation of kindergarten children’. Proceedings of
the National Academy of Sciences, 109: 17168–17173.
Brendgen, M., Boivin, M., Dionne, G., Barker, E. D., Vitaro, F., Girard, A., Tremblay, R., and Pérusse,
D. (2011). ‘Gene–environment processes linking aggression, peer victimization, and the teacher–child
relationship’. Child Development, 82: 2021–2036.
Brendgen, M., Girard, A., Vitaro, F., Dionne, G., and Boivin, M. (2015). ‘Gene-environment correlation
linking aggression and peer victimization: Do classroom behavioural norms matter?’ Journal of Abnormal
Child Psychology, 43: 19–31.
Buist, K. L., Deković, M., Meeus, W., and van Aken, M. A. (2004). ‘The reciprocal relationship between
early adolescent attachment and internalizing and externalizing problem behaviour’. Journal of Adolescence,
27: 251–266.
Buschdorf, J. P. and Meaney, M. J. (2015). ‘Epigenetics/programming in the HPA axis’. Comprehensive
Physiology, 6: 87–110.
15
Debra J. Pepler
Catalano, R. F. and Dawkins, J. D. (1996). ‘The social development model: A theory of antisocial behavior’.
In J. D. Dawkins (Ed.), Delinquency and Crime: Current Theories. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press, pp. 149–197.
Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning (CASEL). ‘Policy recommendations to sustain
SEL’. Retrieved on February 17, 2015 from www.casel.org/policy/recommendations
Connolly, J., Pepler, D., Craig, W., and Taradash, A. (2000). ‘Dating experiences of bullies in early
adolescence’. Child Maltreatment, 5: 299–310.
Craig, W. and Pepler, D. (1997). ‘Observations of bullying and victimization in the schoolyard’. Canadian
Journal of School Psychology, 2: 41–60.
Craig, W., Lambe, L., and McIvor, T. (2016). ‘Bullying and fighting’. In J. G. Freeman, M. King, and
W. Pickett (Eds), Health Behaviour in School-Aged Children (HBSC) in Canada: Focus on Relationships.
Public Health Agency Canada. Retrieved from http://healthycanadians.gc.ca/publications/science-
research-sciences-recherches/health-behaviour-children-canada-2015-comportements-sante-jeunes/
index-eng.php
Dishion, T. J., McCord, J., and Poulin, F. (1999). ‘When interventions harm: Peer groups and problem
behavior’. American Psychologist, 54: 755.
Dishion, T. J., Spracklen, K. M., Andrews, D. W., and Patterson, G. R. (1996). ‘Deviancy training in male
adolescent friendships’. Behaviour Therapy, 27: 373–390.
Dodge, K. A. (1980). ‘Social cognition and children’s aggressive behavior’. Child Development, 51: 162–170.
Dodge, K. A. (1983). ‘Behavioral antecedents of peer social status’. Child Development, 54: 1386–1399.
Dodge, K. A. (2006). ‘Translational science in action: Hostile attributional style and the development of
aggressive behaviour problems’. Development and Psychopathology, 18: 791–814.
Dodge, K. A., Dishion, T. J., and Lansford, J. E. (2006). ‘Deviant peer influences in intervention and public
policy for youth’. Social Policy Report, 20.
Dodge, K. A., Malone, P. S., Lansford, J. E., Miller, S., Pettit, G. S., and Bates, J. E. (2009). ‘A dynamic
cascade model of the development of substance use onset’. Monograph of the Society for Research in Child
Development, 74: vii–119.
Dodge, K. A., Pettit, G. S., Bates, J. E., and Valente, E. (1995). ‘Social information-processing patterns
partially mediate the effect of early physical abuse on later conduct problems’. Journal of Abnormal
Psychology, 104: 632–643.
Doumen, S., Verschueren, K., Buyse, E., Germeijs, V., Luyckx, K., and Soenens, B. (2008). ‘Reciprocal
relations between teacher–child conflict and aggressive behavior in kindergarten: A three-wave
longitudinal study’. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 37: 588–599.
Downey, G., Lebolt, A., Rincón, C., and Freitas, A. L. (1998). ‘Rejection sensitivity and children’s
interpersonal difficulties’. Child Development, 69: 1074–1091.
Eisenberg, N., Valiente, C., and Eggum, N. D. (2010). ‘Self-regulation and school readiness’. Early
Education and Development, 21: 681–698.
Ettekal, I. and Ladd, G. W. (2015). ‘Costs and benefits of children’s physical and relational aggression
trajectories on peer rejection, acceptance, and friendships: Variations by aggression subtypes, gender,
and age’. Developmental Psychology, 51: 1756–1770.
Ferguson, B., Tilleczek, K., Boydell, K., Rummens, J. A., Edney, D. R., and Michaud, J. (2005). Early
School Leavers: Understanding the Lived Reality of Student Disengagement from Secondary School. Report
submitted to the Ontario Ministry of Education and Training, Special Education Branch.
Goldbaum, S., Craig, W. M., Pepler, D., and Connolly, J. (2003). ‘Developmental trajectories of
victimization: Identifying risk and protective factors’. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 19: 139–156.
Granic, I. and Lougheed, J. P. (2016). ‘The role of anxiety in coercive family processes with aggressive
children’. In The Oxford Handbook of Coercive Relationship Dynamics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University
Press, p. 231.
Granic, I., O’Hara, A., Pepler, D., and Lewis, M. D. (2007). ‘A dynamic systems analysis of parent–child
changes associated with successful “real-world” interventions for aggressive children’. Journal of Abnormal
Child Psychology, 35: 845–857.
Gustafsson, H. C., Barnett, M. A., Towe-Goodman, N. R., Mills-Koonce, W. R., Cox, M. J., and Family
Life Project Key Investigators. (2014). ‘Family violence and children’s behaviour problems: Indepen-
dent contributions of intimate partner and child-directed physical aggression’. Journal of Family Violence,
29: 773–781.
Hawley, P. H. and Vaughn, B. E. (2003). ‘Aggression and adaptive functioning: The bright side to bad
behaviour’. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 49: 239–242.
16
The development of aggression
Hirschfield, P. J. and Gasper, J. (2011). ‘The relationship between school engagement and delinquency in
late childhood and early adolescence’. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 40: 3–22.
Hoffman, M. L. (2001). ‘Toward a comprehensive empathy-based theory of prosocial moral development’.
In A. C. Bohart and D. J. Stipek (Eds), Constructive and Destructive Behaviour: Implications for Family,
School, and Society. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, pp. 61–86.
Hoffmann, J. P., Erickson, L. D., and Spence, K. R. (2013). ‘Modeling the association between academic
achievement and delinquency: An application of interactional theory’. Criminology, 51: 629–660.
Hymel, S., Rocke-Henderson, N., and Bonanno, R. A. (2005). ‘Moral disengagement: A framework for
understanding bullying among adolescents’. Journal of Social Sciences, 8: 1–11.
Jouriles, E. N., Vu, N. L., McDonald, R., and Rosenfield, D. (2014). ‘Children’s appraisals of conflict,
beliefs about aggression, and externalizing problems in families characterized by severe intimate partner
violence’. Journal of Family Psychology, 28: 915–924.
Kazdin, A. E. (1997). ‘Parent management training: Evidence, outcomes, and issues’. Journal of the American
Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 36: 1349–1356.
Kochanska, G., Kim, S., Boldt, L. J., and Yoon, J. E. (2013). ‘Children’s callous-unemotional traits
moderate links between their positive relationships with parents at preschool age and externalizing
behaviour problems at early school age’. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 54: 1251–1260.
Kuperminc, G. P., Leadbeater, B. J., and Blatt, S. J. (2001). ‘School social climate and individual differences
in vulnerability to psychopathology among middle school students’. Journal of School Psychology, 39:
141–159.
Lewis, M. D., Granic, I., Lamm, C., Zelazo, P. D., Stieben, J., Todd, R., Moadab, I., and Pepler, D. (2008).
‘Changes in the neural bases of emotion regulation associated with clinical improvement in children
with behaviour problems’. Development and Psychopathology, 20: 913–939.
Liu, H., Li, Y., and Guo, G. (2014). ‘Gene by social-environment interaction for youth delinquency
and violence: Thirty-nine aggression-related genes’. Social Forces: A Scientific Medium of Social Study and
Interpretation, 93: 881.
Loeber, R. and Hay, D. (1997). ‘Key issues in the development of aggression and violence from childhood
to early adulthood’. Annual Review of Psychology, 48: 371–410.
Lösel, F. and Farrington, D. P. (2012). ‘Direct protective and buffering protective factors in the development
of youth violence’. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 43: S8–S23.
McKinnon, J. A. (2008). An Unchanged Mind: The Problem of Immaturity in Adolescence. Herndon, VA:
Lantern Books.
Meldrum, R. C., Connolly, G. M., Flexon, J., and Guerette, R. T. (2016). ‘Parental low self-control,
family environments, and juvenile delinquency’. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative
Criminology, 60: 1623–1644.
Meloni, M. (2014). ‘The social brain meets the reactive genome: Neuroscience, epigenetics and the new
social biology’. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8: 309.
Menesini, E., Sanchez, V., Fonzi, A., Ortega, R., Costabile, A., and Lo Feudo, G. (2003). ‘Moral emotions
and bullying: A cross-national comparison of differences between bullies, victims and outsiders’.
Aggressive Behavior, 29: 515–530.
Mercer, S. H. and DeRosier, M. E. (2008). ‘Teacher preference, peer rejection, and student aggression:
A prospective study of transactional influence and independent contributions to emotional adjustment
and grades’. Journal of School Psychology, 46: 661–685.
Moore, T. E., and Pepler, D. J. (2006). ‘Wounding words: Maternal verbal aggression and children’s
adjustment’. Journal of Family Violence, 21: 89–93.
Moretti, M. M. and Obsuth, I. (2009). ‘Effectiveness of an attachment-focused manualized intervention
for parents of teens at risk for aggressive behaviour: The Connect Program’. Journal of Adolescence, 32:
1347–1357.
Moretti, M. M. and Obsuth, I. (2013). ‘A brief attachment focused treatment program for parents and
caregivers’. In D. Pepler and B. Ferguson (Eds), A Focus on Relationships: Understanding and Addressing
Girls’ Aggressive Behaviour Problems. Kitchener, ON: Wilfred Laurier Press, pp. 159–180.
National Scientific Council on the Developing Child. (2004). ‘Young people develop in an environment
of relationships: Working paper no. 1’. Retrieved on January 1, 2012 from www.developingchild.net
Naumova, O. Y., Hein, S., Suderman, M., Barbot, B., Lee, M., Raefski, M. L., Raefski, A., Dobrynin,
P., Brown, P., Szyf, M., Luthar, S., and Grigorenko, E. L. (2016). ‘Epigenetic patterns modulate the
connection between developmental dynamics of parenting and offspring psychosocial adjustment’. Child
Development, 87: 98–110.
17
Debra J. Pepler
Nolte, D. L. (1972). ‘Children learn what they live’. Retrieved on April 20, 2017 from www.empowerment
resources.com/info2/childrenlearn-long_version.html
O’Connell, P., Pepler, D., and Craig, W. (1999). ‘Peer involvement in bullying: Issues and challenges for
intervention’. Journal of Adolescence, 22: 437–452.
Patterson, G. R. (1982). Coercive Family Process (Vol. 3). Castalia Publishing Company.
Pepler, D. (2006). ‘Bullying interventions: A binocular perspective’. Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child
and Adolescent Psychiatry, 15: 16–20.
Pepler, D. and Slaby, R. (1994). ‘A developmental perspective on violence and youth’. In L. Eron (Ed.),
Reason to Hope: A Psychosocial Perspective on Violence and Youth. Washington, DC: APA Publications,
pp. 27–58.
Pepler, D., Craig, W., Cummings, J., Petrunka, K., and Garwood, S. (in press). ‘Mobilizing Canada to
promote healthy relationships and prevent bullying among children and youth’. In P. Sturmey (Ed.),
The Wiley Handbook of Violence and Aggression (Vol. 3): Societal Interventions.
Pepler, D. J., Craig, W. M., and Roberts, W. L. (1998). ‘Observations of aggressive and nonaggressive
children on the school playground’. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 44: 55–76.
Pepler, D., Jiang, D., Craig, W., and Connolly, J. (2008). ‘Developmental trajectories of bullying and
associated factors’. Child Development, 79: 325–338.
Pepler, D., King, G., and Byrd, W. (1991). ‘A social-cognitively based social skills training program for
aggressive children’. In D. Pepler and K. Rubin (Eds), The Development and Treatment of Childhood
Aggression. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 361–379.
Smith, J. D., Dishion, T. J., Shaw, D. S., and Wilson, M. N. (2015). ‘Negative relational schemas predict
the trajectory of coercive dynamics during early childhood’. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 43:
693–703.
Speltz, M. L., DeKlyen, M., and Greenberg, M. T. (1999). ‘Attachment in boys with early onset conduct
problems’. Development and Psychopathology, 11: 269–285.
Sprott, J. B. (2004). ‘The development of early delinquency: Can classroom and school climates make a
difference?’ Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 46: 553–572.
Sprott, J. B., Jenkins, J. M., and Doob, A. N. (2005). ‘The importance of school protecting at-risk youth
from early offending’. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 3: 59–77.
Trentacosta, C. J. and Shaw, D. S. (2008). ‘Maternal predictors of rejecting parenting and early adolescent
antisocial behaviour’. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 36: 247.
Vitaro, F., Barker, E. D., Boivin, M., Brendgen, M., and Tremblay, R. E. (2006). ‘Do early difficult
temperament and harsh parenting differentially predict reactive and proactive aggression?’ Journal of
Abnormal Child Psychology, 34: 681–691.
Volk, A. A., Camilleri, J. A., Dane, A. V., and Marini, Z. A. (2012). ‘Is adolescent bullying an evolutionary
adaptation?’ Aggressive Behavior, 38: 222–238.
Wang, M. T. and Fredricks, J. A. (2014). ‘The reciprocal links between school engagement, youth problem
behaviors, and school dropout during adolescence’. Child Development, 85: 722–737.
Webster-Stratton, C., Jamila Reid, M., and Stoolmiller, M. (2008). ‘Preventing conduct problems and
improving school readiness: Evaluation of the Incredible Years teacher and child training programs in
high-risk schools’. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49: 471–488.
Zadeh, Z. Y., Jenkins, J., and Pepler, D. (2010). ‘A transactional analysis of maternal negativity and child
externalizing behaviour’. International Journal of Behavioural Development, 34: 218–228.
18
The development of aggression in childhood and adolescence
Adams, R. E. , Bukowski, W. M. , and Bagwell, C. (2005). ‘Stability of aggression during early adolescence
as moderated by reciprocated friendship status and friend’s aggression’. International Journal of Behavioural
Development, 29: 139–145.
Atlas, R. and Pepler, D. J. (1998). ‘Observations of bullying in the classroom’. American Journal of
Educational Research, 92: 86–99.
Augimeri, L. K. , Farrington, D. P. , Koegl, C. J. , and Day, D. M. (2007). ‘The SNAP® Under 12 Outreach
Project: Effects of a community based program for children with conduct problems’. Journal of Child and
Family Studies, 16: 799–807.
Bandura, A. (1999). ‘Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities’. Personality and Social
Psychology Review, 3: 193–209.
Baumrind, D. (1991). ‘The influence of parenting style on adolescent competence and substance use’. The
Journal of Early Adolescence, 11: 56–95.
Becht, A. I. , Prinzie, P. , Dekovic´, M. , Van den Akker, A. L. , and Shiner, R. L. (2016). ‘Child personality
facets and overreactive parenting as predictors of aggression and rule-breaking trajectories from childhood
to adolescence’. Development and Psychopathology, 28: 399–413.
Biglan, A. , Flay, B. R. , Embry, D. D. , and Sandler, I. N. (2012). ‘The critical role of nurturing environments
for promoting human well-being’. American Psychologist, 67: 257.
Boyce, W. T. , Obradovic´, J. , Bush, N. R. , Stamperdahl, J. , Kim, Y. S. , and Adler, N. (2012). ‘Social
stratification, classroom climate, and the behavioral adaptation of kindergarten children’. Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences, 109: 17168–17173.
Brendgen, M. , Boivin, M. , Dionne, G. , Barker, E. D. , Vitaro, F. , Girard, A. , Tremblay, R. , and Pérusse, D.
(2011). ‘Gene–environment processes linking aggression, peer victimization, and the teacher–child
relationship’. Child Development, 82: 2021–2036.
Brendgen, M. , Girard, A. , Vitaro, F. , Dionne, G. , and Boivin, M. (2015). ‘Gene-environment correlation
linking aggression and peer victimization: Do classroom behavioural norms matter?’ Journal of Abnormal
Child Psychology, 43: 19–31.
Buist, K. L. , Dekovic´, M. , Meeus, W. , and van Aken, M. A. (2004). ‘The reciprocal relationship between
early adolescent attachment and internalizing and externalizing problem behaviour’. Journal of Adolescence,
27: 251–266.
Buschdorf, J. P. and Meaney, M. J. (2015). ‘Epigenetics/programming in the HPA axis’. Comprehensive
Physiology, 6: 87–110.
Catalano, R. F. and Dawkins, J. D. (1996). ‘The social development model: A theory of antisocial behavior’.
In J. D. Dawkins (Ed.), Delinquency and Crime: Current Theories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,
pp. 149–197.
Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional, Learning (CASEL ). ‘Policy recommendations to sustain
SEL’. Retrieved on February 17, 2015 from www.casel.org/policy/recommendations
Connolly, J. , Pepler, D. , Craig, W. , and Taradash, A. (2000). ‘Dating experiences of bullies in early
adolescence’. Child Maltreatment, 5: 299–310.
Craig, W. and Pepler, D. (1997). ‘Observations of bullying and victimization in the schoolyard’. Canadian
Journal of School Psychology, 2: 41–60.
Craig, W. , Lambe, L. , and McIvor, T. (2016). ‘Bullying and fighting’. In J. G. Freeman , M. King , and W.
Pickett (Eds), Health Behaviour in School-Aged Children (HBSC) in Canada: Focus on Relationships. Public
Health Agency Canada. Retrieved from http://healthycanadians.gc.ca/publications/science-research-
sciences-recherches/health-behaviour-children-canada-2015-comportements-sante-jeunes/index-eng.php
Dishion, T. J. , McCord, J. , and Poulin, F. (1999). ‘When interventions harm: Peer groups and problem
behavior’. American Psychologist, 54: 755.
Dishion, T. J. , Spracklen, K. M. , Andrews, D. W. , and Patterson, G. R. (1996). ‘Deviancy training in male
adolescent friendships’. Behaviour Therapy, 27: 373–390.
Dodge, K. A. (1980). ‘Social cognition and children’s aggressive behavior’. Child Development, 51: 162–170.
Dodge, K. A. (1983). ‘Behavioral antecedents of peer social status’. Child Development, 54: 1386–1399.
Dodge, K. A. (2006). ‘Translational science in action: Hostile attributional style and the development of
aggressive behaviour problems’. Development and Psychopathology, 18: 791–814.
Dodge, K. A. , Dishion, T. J. , and Lansford, J. E. (2006). ‘Deviant peer influences in intervention and public
policy for youth’. Social Policy Report, 20.
Dodge, K. A. , Malone, P. S. , Lansford, J. E. , Miller, S. , Pettit, G. S. , and Bates, J. E. (2009). ‘A dynamic
cascade model of the development of substance use onset’. Monograph of the Society for Research in Child
Development, 74: vii–119.
Dodge, K. A. , Pettit, G. S. , Bates, J. E. , and Valente, E. (1995). ‘Social information-processing patterns
partially mediate the effect of early physical abuse on later conduct problems’. Journal of Abnormal
Psychology, 104: 632–643.
Doumen, S. , Verschueren, K. , Buyse, E. , Germeijs, V. , Luyckx, K. , and Soenens, B. (2008). ‘Reciprocal
relations between teacher–child conflict and aggressive behavior in kindergarten: A three-wave longitudinal
study’. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 37: 588–599.
Downey, G. , Lebolt, A. , Rincón, C. , and Freitas, A. L. (1998). ‘Rejection sensitivity and children’s
interpersonal difficulties’. Child Development, 69: 1074–1091.
Eisenberg, N. , Valiente, C. , and Eggum, N. D. (2010). ‘Self-regulation and school readiness’. Early
Education and Development, 21: 681–698.
Ettekal, I. and Ladd, G. W. (2015). ‘Costs and benefits of children’s physical and relational aggression
trajectories on peer rejection, acceptance, and friendships: Variations by aggression subtypes, gender, and
age’. Developmental Psychology, 51: 1756–1770.
Ferguson, B. , Tilleczek, K. , Boydell, K. , Rummens, J. A. , Edney, D. R. , and Michaud, J. (2005). Early
School Leavers: Understanding the Lived Reality of Student Disengagement from Secondary School. Report
submitted to the Ontario Ministry of Education and Training, Special Education Branch.
Goldbaum, S. , Craig, W. M. , Pepler, D. , and Connolly, J. (2003). ‘Developmental trajectories of
victimization: Identifying risk and protective factors’. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 19: 139–156.
Granic, I. and Lougheed, J. P. (2016). ‘The role of anxiety in coercive family processes with aggressive
children’. In The Oxford Handbook of Coercive Relationship Dynamics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press,
p. 231.
Granic, I. , O’Hara, A. , Pepler, D. , and Lewis, M. D. (2007). ‘A dynamic systems analysis of parent–child
changes associated with successful “real-world” interventions for aggressive children’. Journal of Abnormal
Child Psychology, 35: 845–857.
Gustafsson, H. C. , Barnett, M. A. , Towe-Goodman, N. R. , Mills-Koonce, W. R. , Cox, M. J. , and Family
Life Project Key Investigators. (2014). ‘Family violence and children’s behaviour problems: Independent
contributions of intimate partner and child-directed physical aggression’. Journal of Family Violence, 29:
773–781.
Hawley, P. H. and Vaughn, B. E. (2003). ‘Aggression and adaptive functioning: The bright side to bad
behaviour’. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 49: 239–242.
Hirschfield, P. J. and Gasper, J. (2011). ‘The relationship between school engagement and delinquency in
late childhood and early adolescence’. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 40: 3–22.
Hoffman, M. L. (2001). ‘Toward a comprehensive empathy-based theory of prosocial moral development’. In
A. C. Bohart and D. J. Stipek (Eds), Constructive and Destructive Behaviour: Implications for Family, School,
and Society. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, pp. 61–86.
Hoffmann, J. P. , Erickson, L. D. , and Spence, K. R. (2013). ‘Modeling the association between academic
achievement and delinquency: An application of interactional theory’. Criminology, 51: 629–660.
Hymel, S. , Rocke-Henderson, N. , and Bonanno, R. A. (2005). ‘Moral disengagement: A framework for
understanding bullying among adolescents’. Journal of Social Sciences, 8: 1–11.
Jouriles, E. N. , Vu, N. L. , McDonald, R. , and Rosenfield, D. (2014). ‘Children’s appraisals of conflict, beliefs
about aggression, and externalizing problems in families characterized by severe intimate partner violence’.
Journal of Family Psychology, 28: 915–924.
Kazdin, A. E. (1997). ‘Parent management training: Evidence, outcomes, and issues’. Journal of the
American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 36: 1349–1356.
Kochanska, G. , Kim, S. , Boldt, L. J. , and Yoon, J. E. (2013). ‘Children’s callous-unemotional traits
moderate links between their positive relationships with parents at preschool age and externalizing
behaviour problems at early school age’. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 54: 1251–1260.
Kuperminc, G. P. , Leadbeater, B. J. , and Blatt, S. J. (2001). ‘School social climate and individual
differences in vulnerability to psychopathology among middle school students’. Journal of School
Psychology, 39: 141–159.
Lewis, M. D. , Granic, I. , Lamm, C. , Zelazo, P. D. , Stieben, J. , Todd, R. , Moadab, I. , and Pepler, D.
(2008). ‘Changes in the neural bases of emotion regulation associated with clinical improvement in children
with behaviour problems’. Development and Psychopathology, 20: 913–939.
Liu, H. , Li, Y. , and Guo, G. (2014). ‘Gene by social-environment interaction for youth delinquency and
violence: Thirty-nine aggression-related genes’. Social Forces: A Scientific Medium of Social Study and
Interpretation, 93: 881.
Loeber, R. and Hay, D. (1997). ‘Key issues in the development of aggression and violence from childhood to
early adulthood’. Annual Review of Psychology, 48: 371–410.
Lösel, F. and Farrington, D. P. (2012). ‘Direct protective and buffering protective factors in the development
of youth violence’. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 43: S8–S23.
McKinnon, J. A. (2008). An Unchanged Mind: The Problem of Immaturity in Adolescence. Herndon, VA:
Lantern Books.
Meldrum, R. C. , Connolly, G. M. , Flexon, J. , and Guerette, R. T. (2016). ‘Parental low self-control, family
environments, and juvenile delinquency’. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative
Criminology, 60: 1623–1644.
Meloni, M. (2014). ‘The social brain meets the reactive genome: Neuroscience, epigenetics and the new
social biology’. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8: 309.
Menesini, E. , Sanchez, V. , Fonzi, A. , Ortega, R. , Costabile, A. , and Lo Feudo, G. (2003). ‘Moral emotions
and bullying: A cross-national comparison of differences between bullies, victims and outsiders’. Aggressive
Behavior, 29: 515–530.
Mercer, S. H. and DeRosier, M. E. (2008). ‘Teacher preference, peer rejection, and student aggression: A
prospective study of transactional influence and independent contributions to emotional adjustment and
grades’. Journal of School Psychology, 46: 661–685.
Moore, T. E. , and Pepler, D. J. (2006). ‘Wounding words: Maternal verbal aggression and children’s
adjustment’. Journal of Family Violence, 21: 89–93.
Moretti, M. M. and Obsuth, I. (2009). ‘Effectiveness of an attachment-focused manualized intervention for
parents of teens at risk for aggressive behaviour: The Connect Program’. Journal of Adolescence, 32:
1347–1357.
Moretti, M. M. and Obsuth, I. (2013). ‘A brief attachment focused treatment program for parents and
caregivers’. In D. Pepler and B. Ferguson (Eds), A Focus on Relationships: Understanding and Addressing
Girls’ Aggressive Behaviour Problems. Kitchener, ON: Wilfred Laurier Press, pp. 159–180.
National Scientific Council on the Developing Child . (2004). ‘Young people develop in an environment of
relationships: Working paper no. 1’. Retrieved on January 1, 2012 from www.developingchild.net
Naumova, O. Y. , Hein, S. , Suderman, M. , Barbot, B. , Lee, M. , Raefski, M. L. , Raefski, A. , Dobrynin, P. ,
Brown, P. , Szyf, M. , Luthar, S. , and Grigorenko, E. L. (2016). ‘Epigenetic patterns modulate the connection
between developmental dynamics of parenting and offspring psychosocial adjustment’. Child Development,
87: 98–110.
Nolte, D. L. (1972). ‘Children learn what they live’. Retrieved on April 20, 2017 from
www.empowermentresources.com/info2/childrenlearn-long_version.html
O’Connell, P. , Pepler, D. , and Craig, W. (1999). ‘Peer involvement in bullying: Issues and challenges for
intervention’. Journal of Adolescence, 22: 437–452.
Patterson, G. R. (1982). Coercive Family Process (Vol. 3). Castalia Publishing Company.
Pepler, D. (2006). ‘Bullying interventions: A binocular perspective’. Journal of the Canadian Academy of
Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 15: 16–20.
Pepler, D. and Slaby, R. (1994). ‘A developmental perspective on violence and youth’. In L. Eron (Ed.),
Reason to Hope: A Psychosocial Perspective on Violence and Youth. Washington, DC: APA Publications,
pp. 27–58.
Pepler, D. , Craig, W. , Cummings, J. , Petrunka, K. , and Garwood, S. (in press). ‘Mobilizing Canada to
promote healthy relationships and prevent bullying among children and youth’. In P. Sturmey (Ed.), The
Wiley Handbook of Violence and Aggression (Vol. 3): Societal Interventions.
Pepler, D. J. , Craig, W. M. , and Roberts, W. L. (1998). ‘Observations of aggressive and nonaggressive
children on the school playground’. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 44: 55–76.
Pepler, D. , Jiang, D. , Craig, W. , and Connolly, J. (2008). ‘Developmental trajectories of bullying and
associated factors’. Child Development, 79: 325–338.
Pepler, D. , King, G. , and Byrd, W. (1991). ‘A social-cognitively based social skills training program for
aggressive children’. In D. Pepler and K. Rubin (Eds), The Development and Treatment of Childhood
Aggression. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 361–379.
Smith, J. D. , Dishion, T. J. , Shaw, D. S. , and Wilson, M. N. (2015). ‘Negative relational schemas predict the
trajectory of coercive dynamics during early childhood’. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 43: 693–703.
Speltz, M. L. , DeKlyen, M. , and Greenberg, M. T. (1999). ‘Attachment in boys with early onset conduct
problems’. Development and Psychopathology, 11: 269–285.
Sprott, J. B. (2004). ‘The development of early delinquency: Can classroom and school climates make a
difference?’ Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 46: 553–572.
Sprott, J. B. , Jenkins, J. M. , and Doob, A. N. (2005). ‘The importance of school protecting at-risk youth from
early offending’. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 3: 59–77.
Trentacosta, C. J. and Shaw, D. S. (2008). ‘Maternal predictors of rejecting parenting and early adolescent
antisocial behaviour’. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 36: 247.
Vitaro, F. , Barker, E. D. , Boivin, M. , Brendgen, M. , and Tremblay, R. E. (2006). ‘Do early difficult
temperament and harsh parenting differentially predict reactive and proactive aggression?’ Journal of
Abnormal Child Psychology, 34: 681–691.
Volk, A. A. , Camilleri, J. A. , Dane, A. V. , and Marini, Z. A. (2012). ‘Is adolescent bullying an evolutionary
adaptation?’ Aggressive Behavior, 38: 222–238.
Wang, M. T. and Fredricks, J. A. (2014). ‘The reciprocal links between school engagement, youth problem
behaviors, and school dropout during adolescence’. Child Development, 85: 722–737.
Webster-Stratton, C. , Jamila Reid, M. , and Stoolmiller, M. (2008). ‘Preventing conduct problems and
improving school readiness: Evaluation of the Incredible Years teacher and child training programs in high-
risk schools’. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49: 471–488.
Zadeh, Z. Y. , Jenkins, J. , and Pepler, D. (2010). ‘A transactional analysis of maternal negativity and child
externalizing behaviour’. International Journal of Behavioural Development, 34: 218–228.
Cyberbullying
Aboujaoude, E. , Savage, M.W. , Starcevic, V. and Salame, W.O. (2015). ‘Cyberbullying: Review of an old
problem gone viral’, Journal of Adolescent Health, 57: 10–18.
Allen, K.P. (2012). ‘Off the radar and ubiquitous: Text messaging and its relationship to “drama” and
cyberbullying in an affluent, academically rigorous US high school’, Journal of Youth Studies, 15: 99–117.
Alonzo, M. and Aiken, M. (2004). ‘Flaming in electronic communication’, Decision Support Systems, 36:
205–213.
Ang, R.P. (2015). ‘Adolescent cyberbullying: A review of characteristics, prevention, and intervention
strategies’, Aggression and Violent Behavior, 25: 35–42.
Ang, R.P. , Tan, K. and Talib Mansor, A. (2011). ‘Normative beliefs about aggression as a mediator of
narcissistic exploitativeness and cyberbullying’, Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26: 2619–2634.
Anthony, B.J. , Wessler, S.L. and Sebian, J.K. (2010). ‘Commentary: guiding a public health approach to
bullying’, Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 35: 1113–1115.
Arseneault, L. , Bowes, L. and Shakoor, S. (2010). ‘Bullying victimization in youths and mental health
problems: Much ado about nothing?’, Psychological Medicine, 40: 717–729.
Arslan, S. , Savaser, S. , Hallett, V. and Balci, S. (2012). ‘Cyberbullying among primary school students in
Turkey: Self-reported prevalence and associations with home and school life’, Cyberpsychology, Behavior,
and Social Networking, 15: 527–533.
Baldasare, A. , Bauman, S. , Goldman, L. and Robie, A. (2012). ‘Cyberbullying? Voices of college students’.
In L. Wankel and C. Wankel (Eds.), Misbehavior Online in Higher Education (pp. 127–156). Bingley, UK:
Emerald Publishing Limited.
Bartlett, C. (2014). ‘A meta-analysis of sex differences in cyber-bullying behavior: The moderating role of
age’, Aggressive Behavior, 40: 474–488.
Bartlett, C.P. (2015). ‘Anonymously hurting others online: The effect of anonymity on cyberbullying
frequency’, Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 4: 70–79.
Brewer, G. and Kerslake, J. (2015). ‘Cyberbullying, self-esteem, empathy and loneliness’, Computers in
Human Behavior, 48: 255–260.
Campbell, M. , Spears, B. , Slee, P. , Butler, D. and Kift, S. (2012). ‘Victims’ perceptions of traditional and
cyberbullying, and the psychosocial correlates of their victimisation’, Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties,
17: 389–401.
Canty, J. , Stubbe, M. , Steers, D. and Collings, S. (2016). ‘The trouble with bullying: Deconstructing the
conventional definition of bullying for a child-centred investigation into children’s use of social media’,
Children & Society, 30: 48–58.
Cassidy, W. , Faucher, C. and Jackson, M. (2013). ‘Cyberbullying among youth: A comprehensive review of
current international research and its implications and application to policy and practice’, School Psychology
International, 34: 575–612.
Cénat, J. , Blais, M. , Hébert, M. , Lavoie, F. and Guerrier, M. (2015). ‘Correlates of bullying in Quebec high
school students: The vulnerability of sexual-minority youth’, Journal of Affective Disorders, 183: 315–321.
Cross, D. , Lester, L. and Barnes, A. (2015). ‘A longitudinal study of the social and emotional predictors and
consequences of cyber and traditional bullying victimization’, International Journal of Public Health, 60:
207–217.
D’Antona, R. , Kevorkian, M. and Russom, A. (2010). ‘Sexting, texting, cyberbullying and keeping youth safe
online’, Journal of Social Sciences, 6: 523–528.
DePaolis, K. and Williford, A. (2014). ‘The nature and prevalence of cyber victimization among elementary
school children’, Child & Youth Care Forum, 44: 377–393.
Deschamps, R. and McNutt, K. (2016). ‘Cyberbullying: What’s the problem?’, Canadian Public
Administration, 59(1): 45–71.
Didden, R. , Scholte, R.H.J. , Korzilius, H. , de Moor, J.M.H. , Vermeulen, A. , O’Reilly, M. , Lang, R. and
Lancioni, G.E. (2009). ‘Cyberbullying among students with intellectual and developmental disability in special
education settings’, Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 12: 146–151.
Diener, E. (1980). The Psychology of Group Influence. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Dilmac, B. (2009). ‘Psychological needs as a predictor of cyberbullying: A preliminary report on college
students’, Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 9: 1307–1325.
Dooley, J.J. , Pyzalski, J. and Cross, D. (2009). ‘Cyberbullying versus face-to-face bullying: A theoretical and
conceptual review’, Journal of Psychology, 217: 182–188.
Englander, E. (2012, November 12). ‘Cyberbullying among 11,700 elementary school students’, Kansas City,
MO: Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Bullying Prevention Association.
Floros, G.D. , Siomos, K.E. , Fisoun, V. , Dafouli, E. and Geroukalis, D. (2013). ‘Adolescent online
cyberbullying in Greece: The impact of parental online security practices, bonding, and online
impulsiveness’, The Journal of School Health, 83: 445–453.
Gentile, D.A. , Coyne, S.M. and Bricolo, F. (2013). ‘Pathological technology addictions: What is scientifically
known and what remains to be learned’. In K.E. Dill (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Media Psychology (pp.
382–402). New York: Oxford University Press.
Gini, G. and Pozzoli, T. (2013). ‘Bullied children and psychosomatic problems: A meta-analysis’, Pediatrics,
132: 720–729.
Giumetti, G.W. and Kowalski, R.M. (2015). ‘Cyberbullying matters: Examining the incremental impact of
cyberbullying on outcomes above and beyond traditional bullying in North America’. In R. Navarro , S.
Yubero and E. Larranga (Eds.), Cyberbullying Across the Globe: Gender, Family, and Mental Health (pp.
117–130). New York: Springer.
Gradinger, P. , Strohmeier, D. and Spiel, C. (2009). ‘Traditional bullying and cyberbullying: Identification of
risk groups for adjustment problems’, Zeitschrift Fur Psychologie, 217: 205–213.
Guan, N.C. , Kanagasundram, S. , Ann, Y.H. , Hui, T.L. and Mun, T.K. (2016). ‘Cyber bullying: A new social
menace’, ASEAN Journal of Psychiatry, 17: 104–115.
Hinduja, S. and Patchin, J.W. (2008). ‘Cyberbullying: An exploratory analysis of factors related to offending
and victimization’, Deviant Behavior, 29: 129–156.
Hinduja, S. and Patchin, J.W. (2010). ‘Bullying, cyberbullying, and suicide’, Archives of Suicide Research,
14: 206–221.
Hoff, D.L. and Mitchell, S.N. (2009). ‘Cyberbullying: Causes, effects, and remedies’, Journal of Educational
Administration, 47: 652–665.
Holfeld, B. and Grabe, M. (2012). ‘An examination of the history, prevalence, characteristics, and reporting of
cyberbullying in the United States’. In Q. Li , D. Cross and P.K. Smith (Eds.), Cyberbullying in the Global
Playground: Research from International Perspectives (pp. 117–142). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Juvonen, J. and Gross, E.F. (2008). ‘Extending the school grounds? Bullying experiences in cyberspace’,
Journal of School Health, 78: 496–505.
Kelleci, M. and Ìnal, S. (2010). ‘Psychiatric symptoms in adolescents and internet use: Comparison without
internet use’, Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 13: 191–194.
König, A. , Gollwitzer, M. and Steffgen, G. (2010). ‘Cyberbullying as an act of revenge?’, Australian Journal
of Guidance & Counselling, 20: 210–224.
Kowalski, R.M. and Fedina, D. (2011). ‘Cyberbullying in ADHD and Asperger syndrome populations’,
Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 5: 1202–1208.
Kowalski, R.M. and Giumetti, G. (2016). ‘Cyberbullying among children 0 to 8 years’. In B. Spodek and O.
Saracho (Eds.), Research on Bullying in Early Childhood Education (pp. 157–175). New York: Information
Age.
Kowalski, R.M. and Limber, S.P. (2007). ‘Electronic bullying among middle school students’, Journal of
Adolescent Health, 41: S22–S30.
Kowalski, R.M. and Limber, S.P. (2013). ‘Psychological, physical, and academic correlates of cyberbullying
and traditional bullying’, Journal of Adolescent Health, 53: S13–S20.
Kowalski, R.M. , Limber, S.E. and Agatston, P.W. (2012). Cyberbullying: Bullying in the Digital Age (2nd ed.).
Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Kowalski, R.M. , Morgan, C. and Limber, S. (2012). ‘Traditional bullying as a potential warning sign of
cyberbullying’, School Psychology International, 33: 505–519.
Kowalski, R.M. , Toth, A. and Morgan, M. (2017). ‘Bullying and cyberbullying in adulthood and the
workplace’, Journal of Social Psychology: 1–18. doi:10.1080/00224545.2017.1302402
Kowalski, R.M. , Giumetti, G.W. , Schroeder, A.W. and Lattanner, M.R. (2014). ‘Bullying in the digital age: A
critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth’, Psychological Bulletin, 140:
1073–1137.
Kowalski, R.M. , Giumetti, G.W. , Schroeder, A.W. and Reese, H.H. (2012). ‘Cyber bullying among college
students: Evidence domains of college life’. In C. Wankel and L. Wankel (Eds.), Misbehavior Online in Higher
Education (pp. 293–321). Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing.
Law, D.M. , Shapka, J.D. , Domene, J.F. and Gagné, M.H. (2012). ‘Are cyberbullies really bullies? An
investigation of reactive and proactive online aggression’, Computers in Human Behavior, 28: 664–672.
Law, D.M. , Shapka, J.D. , Hymel, S. , Olson, B.F. and Waterhouse, T. (2012). ‘The changing face of
bullying: An empirical comparison between traditional and internet bullying and victimization’, Computers in
Human Behavior, 28: 226–232. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.09.004
Lebo, H. (2015). ‘2015 Digital Future Report: Surveying the digital future’, available from:
www.digitalcenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/2015-Digital-Future-Report.pdf (accessed October 19,
2016 ).
Lenhart, A. (2015, April 9). ‘Teens, social media, & technology overview 2015’, available from:
www.pewinternet.org/2015/04/09/teens-social-media-technology-2015/ (accessed October 3, 2016 ).
Li, Q. (2006). ‘Cyberbullying in schools: A research of gender differences’, School Psychology International,
27: 157–170.
Livingstone, S. and Smith, P.K. (2014). ‘Annual research review: Harms experienced by child users of online
and mobile technologies: The nature, prevalence and management of sexual and aggressive risks in the
digital age’, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 55: 635–654.
Livingstone, S. , Haddon, L. , Gorzig, A. and Olafsson, K. (2011). ‘Risks and safety for children on the
internet: The UK report’, available from:
www.lse.ac.uk/media@lse/research/EUKidsOnline/EU%20Kids%20II%20%282009-
11%29/National%20reports/UKReport.pdf (accessed November 4, 2016 ).
Mason, K.L. (2008). ‘Cyberbullying: A preliminary assessment for school personnel’, Psychology in the
Schools, 45: 323–348.
Messias, E. , Kindrick, K. and Castro, J. (2014). ‘School bullying, cyberbullying, or both: Correlates of teen
suicidality in the 2011q CDC Youth Risk Behavior Survey’, Comprehensive Psychiatry, 55: 1063–1068.
Modecki, K.L. , Minchin, J. , Harbaugh, A.G. , Guerra, N.G. and Runions, K.C. (2014). ‘Bullying prevalence
across contexts: A meta-analysis measuring cyber and traditional bullying’, Journal of Adolescent Health, 55:
602–611.
Monks, C.P. , Mahdavi, J. and Rix, K. (2016). ‘The emergence of cyberbullying in childhood: Parent and
teacher perspectives’, Psicologia Educativa, 22: 39–48.
Nansel, T. , Overpeck, M. , Pilla, R. , Ruan, W. , Simons-Morton, B. and Scheidt, P. (2001). ‘Bullying
behaviors among US youth: Prevalence and association with psychosocial adjustment’, Journal of the
American Medical Association, 285: 2094–2100.
Nixon, C. (2014). ‘Current perspectives: The impact of cyberbullying on adolescent health’, Adolescent
Health, Medicine and Therapeutics, 5: 143–158.
Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying at School: What We Know and What We Can Do. New York: Blackwell.
Olweus, D. (2013). ‘School bullying: Development and some important challenges’, Annual Review of
Clinical Psychology, 9: 1–14.
Olweus, D. and Limber, S.P. (2010, November). ‘What do we know about bullying: Information from the
Olweus Bullying Questionnaire’, Seattle: WA: Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International
Bullying Prevention Association.
Palfrey, J. , boyd, d. and Sacco, D. (2010). Enhancing Child Safety and Online Technologies: Final Report of
the Internet Safety Technical Task Force. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
Patchin, J.W. and Hinduja, S. (2006). ‘Bullies move beyond the schoolyard: A preliminary look at
cyberbullying’, Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 4: 148–169.
Patchin, J.W. and Hinduja, S. (2012). ‘Cyberbullying: An update and synthesis’. In J.W. Patchin and S.
Hinduja (Eds.), Cyberbullying Prevention and Response (pp. 12–35). New York: Routledge.
Perren, S. , Dooley, J. , Shaw, T. and Cross, D. (2010). ‘Bullying in school and cyberspace: Associations
with depressive symptoms in Swiss and Australian adolescents’, Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and
Mental Health, 4: 28.
Postmes, T. and Spears, R. (1998). ‘Deindividuation and antinormative behavior: A meta-analysis’,
Psychological Bulletin, 123: 238–259.
Prensky, M. (2001). ‘Digital natives, digital immigrants’, On the Horizon, 9: 1–6.
Raskauskas, J. and Stoltz, A.D. (2007). ‘Involvement in traditional and electronic bullying among
adolescents’, Developmental Psychology, 43: 564–575.
Reed, K.P. , Nugent, W. and Cooper, R.L. (2015). ‘Testing a path model of relationships between gender,
age, and bullying victimization and violent behavior, substance abuse, depression, suicidal ideation, and
suicide attempts in adolescents’, Children and Youth Services Review, 55: 128–137.
Reynolds, W.M. (2003). Reynolds’ Bully-Victimization Scales for Schools. San Antonio, TX: Psychological
Corporation.
Rice, E. , Petering, R. , Rhoades, H. , Winetrobe, H. , Goldbach, J. , Plant, A. , Montoya, J. and Kordic, T.
(2015). ‘Cyberbullying perpetration and victimization among middle-school students’, American Journal of
Public Health, 105: e66–e72.
Salmivalli, C. and Pöyhönen, V. (2012). ‘Cyberbullying in Finland’. In Q. Li , D. Cross and P.K. Smith (Eds.),
Cyberbullying in the Global Playground: Research from International Perspectives (pp. 57–72). Chichester,
UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
Selkie, E. , Fales, J. and Moreno, M. (2016). ‘Cyberbullying prevalence among US middle and high school-
aged adolescents: A systematic review and quality assessment’, Journal of Adolescent Health, 58: 125–133.
Slonje, R. and Smith, P.K. (2008). ‘Cyberbullying: Another main type of bullying?’, Scandinavian Journal of
Psychology, 49: 147–154.
Smith, P.K. (2015). ‘The nature of cyberbullying and what we can do about it’, Journal of Research in Special
Education Needs, 15: 175–184.
Smith, P.K. , del Barrio, C. and Tokunaga, R. (2012). ‘Definitions of bullying and cyberbullying: How useful
are the terms?’ In S. Bauman , D. Cross , and J. Walker (Eds.), Principles of Cyberbullying Research:
Definition, Measures, and Methods (pp. 29–40). Philadelphia, PA: Routledge.
Smith, P.K. , Mahdavi, J. , Carvalho, M. , Fisher, S. , Russell, S. and Tippett, N. (2008). ‘Cyberbullying: Its
nature and impact in secondary school pupils’, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49: 376–385.
Sourander, A. , Klomek, A.B. , Ikonen, M. , Lindroos, J. , Luntamo, T. , Koskelainen, M. , Ristkari, T. and
Henenius, H. (2010). ‘Psychosocial risk factors associated with cyberbullying among adolescents’, Archives
of General Psychiatry, 67: 720–728.
Steffgen, G. , König, A. , Pfetsch, J. and Melzer, A. (2011). ‘Are cyberbullies less empathic? Adolescents’
cyberbullying behavior and empathic responsiveness’, Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking,
14: 643–648.
Sticca, F. and Perren, S. (2013). ‘Is cyberbullying worse than traditional bullying? Examining the differential
roles of medium, publicity, and anonymity for the perceived severity of bullying’, Journal of Youth and
Adolescence, 42: 739–750.
Suler, J. (2004). ‘The online disinhibition effect’, Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 7: 321–326.
Tokunaga, R.S. (2010). ‘Following you home from school: A critical review and synthesis of research on
cyber bullying victimization’, Computers in Human Behavior, 26: 277–287.
Twyman, K. , Saylor, C. , Taylor, L. and Comeaux, C. (2010). ‘Comparing children and adolescents engaged
in cyberbullying to matched peers’, Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 13: 195–199.
Vandebosch, H. and Van Cleemput, K. (2009). ‘Cyberbullying among youngsters: Profiles of bullies and
victims’, New Media and Society, 11: 1349–1371.
Van Geel, M. , Vedder, P. and Tanilon, J. (2014). ‘Relationship between peer victimization, cyberbullying,
and suicide in children and adolescents: A meta-analysis’, JAMA Pediatrics, 168: 435–442.
Vannucci, M. , Nocentini, A. , Mazzoni, G. and Menesini, E. (2012). ‘Recalling unpresented hostile words:
False memories predictors of traditional and cyberbullying’, European Journal of Developmental Psychology,
9: 182–194.
Vazsonyi, A.T. , Machackova, H. , Sevcikova, A. , Smahel, D. and Cerna, A. (2012). ‘Cyberbullying in
context: Direct and indirect effects by low self-control across 25 European countries’, European Journal of
Developmental Psychology, 9: 210–227.
Vreeman, R.C. and Carroll, A.E. (2007). ‘A systematic review of school-based interventions to prevent
bullying’, Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 161: 78–88.
Waasdorp, T.E. and Bradshaw, C.P. (2015). ‘The overlap between cyberbullying and traditional bullying’,
Journal of Adolescent Health, 56: 483–488.
Whittaker, E. and Kowalski, R.M. (2015). ‘Cyberbullying via social media’, Journal of School Violence, 14:
11–29.
Willard, N.E. (2007). Cyberbullying and Cyberthreats: Responding to the Challenge of Online Social
Aggression, Threats, and Distress. Champaign, IL: Research Press.
Wingate, V.S. , Minney, J.A. and Guadagno, R.E. (2013). ‘Sticks and stones may break your bones, but
words will always hurt you: A review of cyberbullying’, Social Influence, 8: 87–106.
Ybarra, M.L. and Mitchell, K.J. (2004). ‘Youth engaging in online harassment: Associations with caregiver-
child relationships, internet use, and personal characteristics’, Journal of Adolescence, 27: 319–336.
Ybarra, M.L. , Diener-West, M. and Leaf, P.J. (2007). ‘Examining the overlap in internet harassment and
school bullying: Implications for school intervention’, Journal of Adolescent Health, 41: 42–50.
Violence to partners
Araji, S.K. and Carlson, J. (2001). ‘Family violence including crimes of honor in Jordan: Correlates and
perceptions of seriousness’, Violence Against Women, 7: 586–621.
Archer, J. (1999). ‘Assessment of the reliability of the Conflict Tactics Scale: A meta-analysis’, Journal of
Interpersonal Violence, 14: 1263–1289.
Archer, J. (2000a). ‘Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: A meta-analytic review’,
Psychological Bulletin, 126: 651–680.
Archer, J. (2000b). ‘Sex differences in partner aggression: A reply to Frieze (2000), O’Leary (2000) and
White, Smith, Koss, and Figueredo (2000)’, Psychological Bulletin, 126: 697–702.
Archer, J. (2002). ‘Sex differences in physically aggressive acts between heterosexual partners: A meta-
analytic review’, Aggression and Violent Behavior, 7: 313–351.
Archer, J. (2004). ‘Sex differences in aggression in real-world settings: A meta-analytic review’, Review of
General Psychology, 8: 291–322.
Archer, J. (2006). ‘Cross-cultural differences in physical aggression between partners: A social-role analysis’,
Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10: 113–133.
Archer, J. (2013a). ‘Can evolutionary principles explain patterns of family violence?’, Psychological Bulletin,
138: 403–440.
Archer, J. (2013b). ‘Human sex differences in aggression from the perspective of sexual selection’. In: J.
Heinze and H.-H. Kortüm , eds. Aggression in Humans and Primates: Biology, Psychology, Sociology.
Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 101–119.
Bates, E.A. , Graham-Kevan, N. , and Archer, J. (2014). ‘Testing predictions from the male control theory of
men’s partner violence’, Aggressive Behavior, 40: 42–55.
Bates, E.A. , Archer, J. , and Graham-Kevan, N. (2017). ‘Do the same risk and protective factors influence
aggression towards partners and same-sex others?’, Aggressive Behavior, 43: 163–175.
Borenstein, M. , Hedges, L.V. , Higgins, J.P.T. , and Rothstein, H.R. (2009). Introduction to Meta-analysis.
Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Brinkerhoff, M. and Lupri, E. (1988). ‘Interspousal violence’, Canadian Journal of Sociology, 13: 407–434.
Buss, A.H. , and Perry, M. (1992). ‘The Aggression Questionnaire’, Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 63: 452–459.
Carrado, M. , George, M.J. , Loxam, E. , Jones, L. , and Templar, D. (1996). ‘Aggression in British
heterosexual relationships: A descriptive analysis’, Aggressive Behavior, 22: 401–415.
Catalano, S. (2012). Intimate Partner Violence, 1993–2010 (NCJ 239203). Washington, DC: Bureau of
Justice Statistics, US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs. Retrieved from: www.ojp.usdoj.gov.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Academic
Press.
Corradi, C. and Stöckl, H. (2014). ‘Intimate partner homicide in 10 European countries: Statistical data and
policy development in a cross-national perspective’, European Journal of Criminology, 11: 601–618.
Daly, M. and Wilson, M.I. (1990). ‘Killing the competition: Female/female and male/male homicide’, Human
Nature, 1: 81–107.
DeKeseredy, W. (2011). ‘Feminist contributions to understanding women abuse: Myths, controversies, and
realities’, Aggression and Violent Behavior, 16: 297–302.
Desmarais, S.L. , Reeves, K.A. , Nicholls, T.L. , Telford, R.P. , and Fiebert, M.S. (2012). ‘Prevalence of
physical violence in intimate relationships, Part 2: Rates of male and female perpetration’, Partner Abuse, 3:
170–198.
Dickens, C. (1837–1839/1994). Oliver Twist. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin Books.
Dobash, R.E. and Dobash, R.P. (1977–1978). ‘Wives: The “appropriate” victims of marital violence’,
Victimology: An International Journal, 2: 426–442.
Dobash, R.E. and Dobash, R.P. (1979). Violence Against Wives: A Case Against the Patriarchy. London:
Open Books.
Dobash, R.P. and Dobash, R.E. (2004). ‘Women’s violence to men in intimate relationships: Working on a
puzzle’, British Journal of Criminology, 44: 324–349.
Dobash, R.P. , Dobash, R.E. , Cavanagh, K. , and Lewis, R. (1998). ‘Separate and intersecting realities: A
comparison of men’s and women’s accounts of violence against women’, Violence Against Women, 4:
382–414.
Dobash, R.P. , Dobash, R.E. , Wilson, M. , and Daly, M. (1992). ‘The myth of sexual symmetry in marital
violence’, Social Problems, 39: 71–91.
Dutton, D.G. (2006). Rethinking Domestic Violence. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
Dutton, D.G. and Corvo, K. (2007). ‘The Duluth model: A data-impervious paradigm and a failed strategy’,
Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12: 658–667.
Fagen, R.M. (1981). Animal Play Behavior. London: Oxford University Press.
Felson, R.B. (2002). Violence and Gender Reexamined. Washington, DC: American Psychological
Association.
Felson, R.B. and Outlaw, M.C. (2007). ‘The control motive and marital violence’, Violence and Victims, 22:
387–407.
Fischer, A.H. and Manstead, A.S.R. (2000). ‘The relation between gender and emotions in different cultures’.
In: A.H. Fischer , ed. Gender and Emotion: Social Psychological Perspectives. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge
University Press, pp. 71–94.
Fox, J.A. and Zawitz, M.W. (2012). Homicide Trends in the United States. Washington, DC: Bureau of
Justice Statistics. Retrieved from: www.bjs.gov/index.cfm?ty=pbdetail&iid=966 [Accessed 8 March 2017 ].
Fry, D.P. (1987). ‘Differences between playfighting and serious fighting among Zapotec children’, Ethology
and Sociobiology, 8: 285–306.
George, M.J. (1994). ‘Riding the donkey backwards: Men as the unacceptable victims of marital violence’,
The Journal of Men’s Studies, 3: 137–159.
George, M.J. (2003). ‘Invisible touch’, Aggression and Violent Behavior, 8: 23–60.
Gergen, M. (1990). ‘Beyond the evil empire: Horseplay and aggression’, Aggressive Behavior, 16: 381–398.
Graham-Kevan, N. and Archer, J. (2003a). ‘Physical aggression and control in heterosexual relationships:
The effect of sampling’, Violence and Victims, 18: 181–196.
Graham-Kevan, N. and Archer, J. (2003b). ‘Intimate terrorism and common couple violence: A test of
Johnson’s predictions in four British samples’, Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18: 1247–1270.
Graham-Kevan, N. and Archer, J. (2008). ‘Does controlling behavior predict physical aggression and
violence to partners?’, Journal of Family Violence, 23: 539–548.
Graham-Kevan, N. and Archer, J. (2009). ‘Control tactics and partner violence in heterosexual relationships’,
Evolution and Human Behavior, 30: 445–452.
Grissom, R.J. (1994). ‘Probability of the superior outcome of one treatment over another’, Journal of Applied
Psychology, 79: 314–316.
Haddock, C.K. , Rindskopf, D. , and Shadish, W.R. (1998). ‘Using odds ratios as effect sizes for meta-
analysis of dichotomous data: A primer on methods and issues’, Psychological Methods, 3: 339–353.
Hamby, S. (2016a). ‘Self-report measures that do not produce gender parity in intimate partner violence: A
multi-study investigation’, Psychology of Violence, 6: 323–335.
Hamby, S. (2016b). ‘Advancing survey science for intimate partner violence: The Partner Victimization Scale
and other innovations’, Psychology of Violence, 6: 352–359.
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values. Beverly
Hills, CA: SAGE.
Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations
Across Nations. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
Johnson, M.P. (1995). ‘Patriarchal terrorism and common couple violence: Two forms of violence against
women’, Journal of Marriage and Family, 57: 283–294.
Johnson, M.P. (2005). ‘Domestic violence: It’s not about gender – or is it?’, Journal of Marriage and Family,
67: 1126–1130.
Johnson, M.P. (2006). ‘Conflict and control: Gender symmetry and asymmetry in domestic violence’,
Violence Against Women, 12: 1003–1018.
Johnson, M.P. (2011). ‘Gender and types of intimate partner violence: A response to an anti-feminist
literature review’, Aggression and Violent Behavior, 16: 289–296.
Johnson, M.P. and Ferraro, K.J. (2000). ‘Research on domestic violence in the 1990s’, Journal of Marriage
and Family, 62: 948–963.
Jouriles, E.N. and Kamata, A. (2016). ‘Advancing measurement of intimate partner violence’, Psychology of
Violence, 6: 347–351.
LaRoche, D. (2005). Aspects of the Context and Consequences of Domestic Violence: Situational Couple
Violence and Intimate Terrorism in Canada in 1999. Québec: Institut de la Statistique du Québec. Retrieved
from: www.stat.gouv.qc.ca
Levinson, D. (1989). Family Violence in Cross-Cultural Perspective. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
Mihalic, S.W. and Elliott, D. (1997). ‘If violence is domestic, does it really count?’, Journal of Family Violence,
12: 293–311.
Mirrlees-Black, C. (1999). Domestic Violence: Findings from a New British Crime Survey Self-Completion
Questionnaire (Home Office Research Study 191). London: Home Office.
Moffitt, T.E. , Caspi, A. , Rutter, M. , and Silva, P.A. (2001). Sex Differences in Antisocial Behaviour.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pence, E. and Paymar, M. (1993). Education Groups for Men Who Batter: The Duluth Model. New York:
Springer Publishing.
Pizzey, E. (1974). Scream Quietly or the Neighbours Will Hear. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
Pizzey, E. (2009). ‘Practice report: A comparative study of battered women and violence-prone women’,
Journal of Aggression, Conflict and Peace Research, 1: 53–62.
Ranck, S. and Toft, S. (1986). ‘Domestic violence in an urban context with rural comparisons’. In: Domestic
Violence in Urban Papua New Guinea. Port Moresby, PNG: Law Reform Commission of Papua New Guinea,
Occasional Paper No. 19, pp. 3–51.
Smith, K. , Osborne, S. , Lau, I. , and Britton, A. (2012). Homicides, Firearm Offences and Intimate Violence
2010/11: Supplementary Volume 2 to Crime in England and Wales 2010/11. London: Home Office.
Retrieved from:
www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/116483/hosb0212.pdf [Accessed 8
March 2017 ].
Smith, S.G. , Fowler, K.A. , and Niolon, P.H. (2014). ‘Intimate partner homicide and corollary victims in 16
states: National Violent Death Reporting System, 2003–2009’, American Journal of Public Health, 104:
461–466.
Stets, J.E. and Pirog-Good, M.A. (1990). ‘Interpersonal control and courtship aggression’, Journal of Social
and Personal Relationships, 7: 371–394.
Stockdale, L. , Tackett, S. , and Coyne, S.M. (2013). ‘Sex differences in verbal aggression use in romantic
relationships: A meta-analytic study and review’, Journal of Aggression Conflict and Peace Research, 5:
167–178.
Straus, M.A. (1977–1978). ‘Wife beating: How common and why?’, Victimology, 2: 443–458.
Straus, M.A. (1979). ‘Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The Conflict Tactics (CT) Scales’, Journal
of Marriage and Family, 41: 75–88.
Straus, M.A. (1990). ‘The Conflict Tactics Scales and its critics: An evaluation and new data on validity and
reliability’. In: M.A. Straus and R.J. Gelles , eds. Physical Violence in American Families: Risk Factors and
Adaptations to Violence in 8,145 Families. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, pp. 49–73.
Straus, M.A. (1997). ‘Physical assaults by women partners: A major social problem’. In: M.R. Walsh , ed.
Women, Men and Gender: Ongoing Debates. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, pp. 210–221.
Straus, M.A. (1999). ‘The controversy over domestic violence by women: A methodological, theoretical, and
sociology of science analysis’. In: X.B. Arriaga and S. Oskamp , eds. Violence in Intimate Relationships.
Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, pp. 17–44.
Straus, M.A. (2009). ‘Why the overwhelming evidence on partner physical violence by women has not been
perceived and is often denied’, Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment and Trauma, 18: 552–571.
Straus, M.A. (2011). ‘Gender symmetry and mutuality in perpetration of clinical-level partner violence:
Empirical evidence and implications for prevention and treatment’, Aggression and Violent Behavior, 16:
279–288.
Straus, M.A. (2012). ‘Blaming the messenger for the bad news about partner violence by women: The
methodological, theoretical, and value basis of the purported invalidity of the Conflict Tactics Scales’,
Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 30: 538–556.
Straus, M.A. (2016). ‘Gender-violence, dyadic violence, and dyadic concordance types: A conceptual and
methodological alternative to Hamby (2016) that incorporates both the gendered and dyadic interaction
aspects of violence to enhance research and the safety of women’, Psychology of Violence, 6: 336–346.
Straus, M.A. , Gelles, R.J. , and Steinmetz, S.K. (1980). Behind Closed Doors: Violence in the American
Family. Garden City, NY: Anchor Press/Doubleday.
Straus, M.A. , Hamby, S.L. , Boney-McCoy, S. , and Sugarman, D.B. (1996). ‘The Revised Conflict Tactics
Scales (CTS2): Development and preliminary psychometric data’, Journal of Family Issues, 17: 283–316.
The Daily Telegraph. (2016). ‘“Bullying” bride given life for murdering solicitor husband’ (8 March). UK: The
Daily Telegraph.
Thornton, A.J.V. , Graham-Kevan, N. , and Archer, J. (2016). ‘Intimate partner violence: Are the risk factors
similar for men and women, and similar to other types of offending?’, Aggressive Behavior, 42: 404–412.
Triandis, H.C. (1972). The Analysis of Subjective Culture. New York: Wiley.
Triandis, H.C. (1995). Individualism and Collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Wilson, M. and Daly, M. (1992). ‘Who kills whom in spouse killings? On the exceptional sex ratio of spousal
homicides in the United States’, Criminology, 30: 189–215.
Wolfe, D. , Scott, K. , Reitzel-Jaffe, D. , Wekerle, C. , Grasley, C. , and Straatman, A.-L. (2001).
‘Development and validation of the conflict in adolescent dating relationships inventory’, Psychological
Assessment, 13: 277–293.
Zenter, M. and Mitura, K. (2012). ‘Stepping out of the caveman’s shadow: Nations’ gender gap predicts
degree of sex differentiation in mate preferences’, Psychological Science, 23: 1176–1185.
Using the research evidence to inform the assessment and treatment of intimate
partner aggression
Aaron, S. and Beaulaurier, R. L. 2017, ‘The need for new emphasis on batterers intervention programmes’,
Trauma, Violence and Abuse, 18: 422–432.
Babcock, J. C. , Green, C. E. , and Robie, C. 2004, ‘Does batterer’s treatment work? A meta-analytic review
of domestic violence treatment’, Clinical Psychology Review, 2: 1023–1053.
Babcock, J. C. , Miller, S. A. , and Siard, C. 2003, ‘Toward a typology of abusive women: Differences
between partner-only and generally violent women in the use of violence’, Psychology of Women Quarterly,
27: 153–161.
Baldry, A. C. and Winkel, F. W. 2008, Intimate partner violence prevention and intervention: The risk
assessment and management approach, New York: Nova Science.
Beech, A. R. and Ward, T. 2004, ‘The integration of etiology and risk in sexual offenders: A theoretical
framework’, Aggression and Violent Behavior, 10: 31–63.
Berkowitz, L. 1993, Aggression: Its causes, consequences, and control, Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
Bohall, G. , Bautista, M. , and Musson, S. (in press), ‘Intimate partner violence and the Duluth model: An
examination of the model and recommendations for future research and practice’, Journal of Family
Violence.
Bonta, J. and Andrews, D. A. 2016, The psychology of criminal conduct, 6th ed., London: Routledge.
Bowen, E. 2011, The rehabilitation of partner-violent men, Chichester: Wiley.
Brasfield, R. 2015, ‘Revisiting the derivation of batterer subtypes’, Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30:
3467–3478.
Cantos, A. L. and O’Leary, K. D. 2014, ‘One size does not fit all in treatment of intimate partner violence’,
Partner Abuse, 5: 204–224.
Dahlberg, L. L. and Mercy, J. A. (2009 February), History of violence as a public health issue, AMA Virtual
Mentor, 11: 167–172. Online. Available at: http://virtualmentor.ama-assn.org/2009/02/mhst1-0902.html.
Accessed on 14 September 2017.
Dixon, L. and Browne, K. D. 2003, ‘The heterogeneity of spouse abuse: A review’, Aggression and Violent
Behavior, 8: 107–130.
Dixon, L. and Graham-Kevan, N. 2011, ‘Understanding the nature and etiology of intimate partner violence
and implications for practice and policy’, Clinical Psychology Review, 31: 1145–1155.
Dixon, L. , Archer, J. , and Graham-Kevan, N. 2012, ‘Perpetrator programmes for partner violence: Are they
based on ideology or evidence?’ Legal and Criminological Psychology, 17: 196–215.
Dobash, R. P. and Dobash, R. E. 1979, Violence against wives, New York: The Free Press.
Dobash, R. P. and Dobash, R. E. 2004, ‘Women’s violence to men in intimate relationships’, British Journal
of Criminology, 44: 324–349.
Dutton, D. G. 2006, Rethinking domestic violence, Vancouver, Canada: UCB Press.
Dutton, D. G. and Corvo, K. 2006, ‘Transforming a flawed policy: A call to revive psychology and science in
domestic violence research and practice’, Aggression and Violent Behavior, 11: 457–483.
Eckhardt, C. I. and Schram, J. 2009, ‘Cognitive-behavioural interventions for partner-violent men’. In P.
Lehmann and C. A. Simmons (eds.), Strengths-based batterer intervention, pp. 137–188, New York:
Springer.
Eckhardt, C. , Holtzworth-Munroe, A. , Norlander, B. , Sibley, A. , and Cahill, M. 2008, ‘Readiness to change,
partner violence subtypes, and treatment outcomes among men in treatment for partner assault’, Violence
and Victims, 23: 446–475.
Esquivel-Santoveña, E. E. and Dixon, L. 2012, ‘Investigating the true rate of physical intimate partner
violence: A review of nationally representative surveys’, Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17: 208–219.
Gabora, N. , Stewart, L. , Lilley, K. , and Allegri, N. 2008, A profile of female perpetrators of intimate partner
violence: Implications for treatment R-175, Ottawa, Canada: Correctional Operations and Programmes,
Correctional Service Canada.
Garcia-Moreno, C. , Jansen, H. A. F. M., Ellsberg, M. , Heise, L. , Watts, C. H. , and WHO Multi-country
Study on Women’s Health and Domestic Violence against Women Study Team (2006), ‘Prevalence of IPV:
Findings from the WHO multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence’, The Lancet, 368:
1260–1269.
Gondolf, E. W. 2004, ‘Evaluating batterer counseling programs: A difficult task showing some effects and
implications’, Aggression and Violent Behavior, 9: 605–631.
Gondolf, E. W. 2007, ‘Theoretical and research support for the Duluth model: A reply to Dutton and Corvo’,
Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12: 644–657.
Gondolf, E. W. 2012, The future of batterer programs: Reassessing evidence based practice, Lebanon, NH:
Northeastern University.
Hamel, J. 2005, Gender-inclusive treatment of intimate partner abuse: A comprehensive approach, New
York: Springer.
Hilton, N. Z. , Harris, G. T. , and Rice, M. E. 2010, Risk assessment for domestically violent men: Tools for
criminal justice, offender intervention, and victim services, Washington, DC: APA.
Holtzworth-Munroe, A. and Stuart, G. L. 1994, ‘Typologies of male batterers: Three subtypes and the
differences among them’, Psychological Bulletin, 116: 476–497.
Holtzworth-Munroe, A. , Meehan, C. , Herron, K. , Rehman, U. , and Stuart, G. L. 2000, ‘Testing the
Holtzworth-Munroe and Stuart (1994) batterer typology’, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68:
1000–1019.
Johnson, M. P. 2006, ‘Conflict and control: Gender symmetry and asymmetry in domestic violence’, Violence
Against Women, 12: 1003–1018.
Karakurt, G. , Whiting, K. , van Esch, C. , Bolen, S. D. , and Calabrese, J. R. 2016, ‘Couples therapy for
intimate partner violence: A systematic review and meta analysis’, Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 42:
567–583.
LaRoche, D. 2008, Context and consequences of domestic violence against men and women in Canada
2004: Living conditions, Quebec: Institut de la Statistique du Québec.
Lehmann, P. and Simmons, C. A. 2009, ‘The state of batterer intervention programs: An analytical
discussion’. In P. Lemann and C. A. Simmons (eds.), Strengths-based batterer intervention, pp. 3–37, New
York: Springer.
Loseke, D. R. , Gelles, R. J. , and Cavanaugh, M. M. 2005, ‘Section I: Controversies in conceptualisation’. In
D. R. Loseke , R. J. Gelles , and M. M. Cavanaugh (eds.), Current controversies on family violence, pp. 1–4,
Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Low, K. and Day, A. (in press), ‘Toward a clinically meaningful taxonomy of violent offenders: The role of
anger and thinking styles’, Journal of Interpersonal Violence.
Mihalic, S. and Elliott, D. 1997, ‘If violence is domestic, does it really count?’ Journal of Family Violence, 12:
293–311.
Ministry of Justice (2015), 2014 New Zealand crime and safety, survey (Te rangahau O Aotearoa mö te
taihara me te haumarutanga 2014): Main findings, Wellington, NZ: MOJ.
O’Leary, K. D. , Smith Slep, A. M. , and O’Leary, S. G. 2007, ‘Multivariate models of men’s and women’s
partner aggression’, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 75: 752–764.
Povey, D. , Coleman, K. , Kaiza, P. , Hoare, J. , and Jansson, K. 2008, ‘Homicide, firearms and intimate
violence 2006/07’, Home Office Statistical Bulletin 03/08, London: Home Office.
Radatz, D. L. and Wright, E. M. 2016, ‘Integrating the principles of effective intervention into batterer
intervention programming: The case for moving toward more evidence-based programming’, Trauma,
Violence and Abuse, 17: 72–87.
Schafer, J. , Caetano, R. , and Clark, C. L. 1998, ‘Rates of intimate partner violence in the United States’,
American Journal of Public Health, 88: 1702–1704.
Spencer, C. , Cafferky, B. , and Stith, S. M. (in press), ‘Gender differences in risk markers for perpetration of
physical partner violence: Results from a meta-analytic review’, Journal of Family Violence.
Stewart, L. A. , Flight, J. , and Slavin-Stewart, C. 2013, ‘Applying effective corrections principles (RNR) to
partner abuse interventions’, Partner Abuse, 4: 494–534.
Stewart, L. A. , Gabora, N. , Kropp, P. R. , and Lee, Z. 2014, ‘Effectiveness of risk needs-responsivity-based
family violence programs with male offenders’, Journal of Family Violence, 29: 151–164.
Stith, S. M. , Smith, D. B. , Penn, C. E. , Ward, D. B. , and Tritt, D. 2004, ‘Intimate partner physical abuse
perpetration and victimization risk factors: A meta-analytic review’, Aggression and Violent Behavior, 10:
65–98.
Straus, M. A. 1999, Characteristics of the national violence against women study that might explain the low
assault rate for both sexes and the even lower rate for assault by women. Online. Available at:
www.batteredmen.com/straus22.htm. Accessed on 14 September 2017 .
Straus, M. A. 2011, ‘Gender symmetry and mutuality in perpetration of clinical-level partner violence:
Empirical evidence and implications for prevention and treatment’, Aggression and Violent Behavior, 16:
279–288.
US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . (2015 March 25), Injury prevention and control: Division of
Violence Prevention: The public heath approach to violence prevention. Online. Available at:
www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/overview/publichealthapproach.html. Accessed on 11 November 2016 .
Walters, M. L. , Chen, J. , and Breiding, M. J. 2010, The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence
Survey (NISVS): 2010 findings on victimization by sexual orientation, Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury
Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Ward, T. 2014, ‘The explanation of sexual offending: From single factor theories to integrative pluralism’,
Journal of Sexual Aggression, 20: 130–141.
Ward, T. , Polaschek, D. , & Beech, A. 2006, Theories of sexual offending, Chichester: John Wiley.
Jihadi-Salafi terrorism and violent extremism in the era of al-Qaeda and the
Islamic State
Australian National University (ANU) . (2013). “Prime Minister Julia Gillard’s speech at the National Security
College.” Available at: https://crawford.anu.edu.au/news-events/news/132/prime-minister-julia-gillards-
speech-national-security-college [Accessed: 31 March 2017 ].
Barton, G. (2005). Jemaah Islamiyah: Radical Islamism in Indonesia. Singapore: Singapore University Press.
Barton, G. (2009). “The historical development of Jihadi Islamist thought in Indonesia.” In: S. Helfstein (ed.)
Radical Islamic Ideology in Southeast Asia. New York: The Combating Terrorism Center at West Point.
Available at: www.ctc.usma.edu/publications/Southeast%20Asia%20Report.pdf [Accessed: 26 September
2017 ].
Barton, G. (2010). “Indonesia.” In: Barry Rubin (ed.) Guide to Islamist Movements. New York: M.E. Sharpe,
Inc.
Barton, G. (2015a). “Paris attack: How should we respond?” Inside Story. Available at:
http://insidestory.org.au/how-should-we-respond [Accessed: 26 September 2017 ].
Barton, G. (2015b). “Australia, Turkey, and understandings of Islam in a secular age: The Islamic State
movement and the challenge of rising extremism.” In: M. Michael (ed.) Reconciling Cultural and Political
Identities in a Globalized World: Perspectives on Australia-Turkey Relations. London: Palgrave Macmillan,
pp. 113–133.
Barton, G. (2015c). “Islamic State, radicalisation and the recruitment of foreign fighters in Australia: Making
hijrah from lucky country to God’s nation.” In: Panorama – From Desert to World Cities – The New Terrorism.
Singapore: Konrad Adenaeur Stiftung, pp. 105–122. Available at: www.kas.de/politikdialog-
asien/en/publications/42032/ [Accessed: 26 September 2017 ].
Bergen, P. (2016). United States of Jihad: Investigating America’s Home-Grown Terrorists. New York:
Crown.
Burke, J. (2017). “The myth of the ‘lone wolf’ terrorist.” The Guardian, March 30. Available at:
www.theguardian.com/news/2017/mar/30/myth-lone-wolf-terrorist [Accessed: 26 September 2017 ].
Callimachi, R. (2015). “ISIS and the lonely young American.” The New York Times, June 27. Available at:
www.nytimes.com/2015/06/28/world/americas/isis-online-recruiting-american.html [Accessed: 26 September
2017 ].
Callimachi, R. (2016). “Was Orlando shooter really acting for ISIS? For ISIS, it’s all the same.” The New York
Times, June 12. Available at: www.nytimes.com/2016/06/13/us/orlando-omar-mateen-isis.html [Accessed:
26 September 2017 ].
Callimachi, R. (2017). “Not ‘lone wolves’ after all: How ISIS guides world’s terror plots from afar.” The New
York Times, February 4. Available at: www.nytimes.com/2017/02/04/world/asia/isis-messaging-app-terror-
plot.html. For related interactive content see also: www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/02/04/world/isis-
remote-control-enabled-attack.html [Accessed: 26 September 2017 ].
Corner, E. , and Gill, P. (2017). “Is there a nexus between terrorist involvement and mental health in the age
of the Islamic State?” CTC Sentinel, 10: 1–10. Available at: www.ctc.usma.edu/posts/is-there-a-nexus-
between-terrorist-involvement-and-mental-health-in-the-age-of-the-islamic-state [Accessed: 26 September
2017 ].
Hoffman, B. (2008). “The myth of grass-roots terrorism: Why Osama bin Laden still matters.” Foreign Affairs,
87: 133. Available at: www.foreignaffairs.com/reviews/review-essay/2008-05-03/myth-grass-roots-terrorism
[Accessed: 26 September 2017 ].
Institute for Economics and Peace (IEP ). (2016). Global Terrorism Index 2016. Available at:
http://economicsandpeace.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Global-Terrorism-Index-2016.2.pdf [Accessed:
26 September 2017 ].
Juergensmeyer, M. (2003). Terror in the Mind of God: The Global Rise of Religious Violence. Los Angeles:
University of California Press.
Kilcullen, D. (2016). Blood Year: The Unraveling of Western Counterterrorism. New York: Oxford University
Press.
Klein, B. , Parkin, W. , Gruenewald, J. , Freilich, J. D. , and Chermak, S. (2017). “Analysis: Deadly threat
from far-right extremists is overshadowed by fear of Islamic terrorism.” PBS News Hour, February 24.
Koehler, D. (2017). Right-Wing Terrorism in the 21st-Century: The ‘National-Socialist Underground’ and the
History of Terror from the Far-Right in Germany. New York: Routledge.
Kruglanski, A. W. , Gelfand, M. J. , Bélanger, J. J. , Sheveland, A. , Hetiarachchi, M. , and Gunaratna, R.
(2014). “The psychology of radicalization and deradicalization: How significance quest impacts violent
extremism.” Political Psychology, 35: 69–93.
Kurzman, C. (2017). Muslim-American Involvement with Violent Extremism, 2016. Chapel Hill, NC: Triangle
Center on Terrorism and Homeland Security. Available at:
https://sites.duke.edu/tcths/files/2017/01/Kurzman_Muslim-
American_Involvement_in_Violent_Extremism_2016.pdf [Accessed: 26 September 2017 ].
Lister, C. R. (2016). The Syrian Jihad: Al-Qaeda, the Islamic State and the Evolution of an Insurgency. New
York: Oxford University Press.
Maher, S. (2016). Salafi-Jihadism: The History of an Idea. New York: Oxford University Press.
Malsin, J. (2017). “Experts warn President Trump’s refugee ban could backfire.” Time, January 28. Available
at: http://time.com/4651729/president-trump-refugee-suspension-backfire/ [Accessed: 26 September 2017 ].
Neumann, P. R. (2013). “The trouble with radicalization.” International Affairs, 89: 873–893.
Neumann, P. R. (2017). Radicalized: New Jihadists and the Threat to the West. London: I.B. Tauris.
Rapoport, D. C. (2004). “The four waves of modern terrorism.” Attacking Terrorism: Elements of a Grand
Strategy. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, pp. 46–73.
Richardson, L. (2007). What Terrorists Want: Understanding the Enemy, Containing the Threat. New York:
Random House.
Sageman, M. (2011). Leaderless Jihad: Terror Networks in the Twenty-First Century. Philadelphia:
University of Pennsylvania Press.
Shane, S. , Perez-Pena, R. , and Breeden, A. (2016). “‘In-betweeners’ are part of a rich recruiting pool for
Jihadists.” The New York Times, September 22. Available at: www.nytimes.com/2016/09/23/us/isis-al-
qaeda-recruits-anwar-al-awlaki.html?_r=0 [Accessed: 26 September 2017 ].
Stiglitz, J. , and Bilmes, L. (2008). The Three Trillion Dollar War: The True Cost of the Iraq Conflict. New
York: W.W. Norton.
Wright, R. et al. (2016). “The Jihadi threat: ISIS, al-Qaeda, and beyond.” United States Institute of Peace.
Available at: www.usip.org/sites/default/files/The-Jihadi-Threat-ISIS-Al-Qaeda-and-Beyond.pdf [Accessed:
26 September 2017 ].
Drive-bys in Chiraq
1
or ethnic genocide in Iraq
Atwan, A. B. (2015). Islamic State: The Digital Caliphate. Oakland: University of California Press.
Bjerregaard, B. (2003). ‘Antigang legislation and its potential impact: The promises and the pitfalls’, Criminal
Justice Policy Review, 14: 171–192.
Bouchard, M. (2015). Social Networks, Terrorism and Counter-Terrorism: Radical and Connected. New
York: Routledge.
Brantingham, P. J. , Tita, G. E. , Short, M. , and Reid, S. E. (2012). ‘The social ecology of gang territorial
boundaries’, Criminology, 50: 851–885.
Brotherton, D. , and Barrios, L. (2004). The Almighty Latin King and Queen Nation: Street Politics and the
Transformation of a New York City Gang. New York: Columbia University Press.
Byman, D. (2015a). The Six Faces of the Islamic State. Washington, DC: Lawfare. Available at:
www.lawfareblog.com/six-faces-islamic-state [Accessed 15 March 2016 ].
Byman, D. (2015b). Al-Qaeda, The Islamic State, and the Global Jihadist Movement: What Everyone Needs
to Know. New York: Oxford University Press.
Chandrasekaran, R. (2006). Imperial Life in the Emerald City: Inside Iraq’s Green Zone. New York: Vintage
Books.
Cohen, A. K. (1955). Delinquent Boys: The Culture of the Gang. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.
Cronin, A. K. (2015). ‘ISIS is not a terrorist group’, Foreign Affairs, 94: 87–98.
Curry, G. D. (1998). ‘Female gang involvement’, Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 35:
100–118.
Curry, G. D. (2011). ‘Gangs, crime, and terrorism’. In: B. Forst , J. R. Greene , and J. P. Lynch , eds.
Criminologists on Terrorism and Homeland Security. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 97–112.
Decker, S. H. , and Curry, G. D. (2002). ‘Gangs, gang homicides, and gang loyalty: Organized crimes or
disorganized criminals’, Journal of Criminal Justice, 30: 343–352.
Decker, S. H. , and Pyrooz, D. C. (2011). ‘Gangs, terrorism, and radicalization’, Journal of Strategic Security,
4: 151–166.
Decker, S. H. , and Pyrooz, D. C. (2015). ‘“I’m down for a jihad”: How 100 years of gang research can inform
the study of terrorism, radicalization and extremism’, Perspectives on Terrorism, 9: 104–112.
Densley, J. A. (2013). How Gangs Work: An Ethnography of Youth Violence. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Felson, M. (2006). Crime and Nature. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Forst, B. (2009). Terrorism, Crime, and Public Policy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Gambetta, D. , and Hertog, S. (2016). Engineers of Jihad: The Curious Connection Between Violent
Extremism and Education. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Gerges, F. A. (2016). ISIS: A History. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Gravel, J. , Bouchard, M. , Descormiers, K. , Wong, J. S. , and Morselli, C. (2013). ‘Keeping promises: A
systematic review and a new classification of gang control strategies’, Journal of Criminal Justice, 41:
228–242.
Hagedorn, J. (2008). A World of Gangs: Armed Young Men and Gangsta Culture. Minneapolis: University of
Minnesota Press.
Hennigan, K. M. , and Spanovic, M. (2012). ‘Gang dynamics through the lens of social identity theory’. In: F.
Esbensen and C. L. Maxson , eds. Youth Gangs in International Perspective. New York: Springer, pp.
127–149.
Hoston, W. T. (2014). Black Masculinity in the Obama Era. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Joffé, G. (2016). ‘The fateful phoenix: The revival of al-Qa’ida in Iraq’, Small Wars & Insurgencies, 27: 1–21.
Klein, M. W. , and Maxson, C. L. (2006). Street Gang Patterns and Policies. New York: Oxford University
Press.
Leovy, J. (2015). Ghettoside: A True Story of Murder in America. New York: Spiegel & Grau.
Levitt, S. D. , and Venkatesh, S. A. (2000). ‘An economic analysis of a drug-selling gang’s finances’, The
Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115: 755–789.
Lister, C. R. (2015). The Islamic State: A Brief Introduction. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute Press.
Michaels, J. (2016). ‘ISIL loses 45% of territory in Iraq, 20% in Syria’. USA Today, 17 May . Available at:
http://usat.ly/27wV4W4
Moore, J. W. (1991). Going Down to the Barrio: Homeboys and Homegirls in Change. Philadelphia, PA:
Temple University.
Morselli, C. , and Décary-Hétu, D. (2013). ‘Crime facilitation purposes of social networking sites: A review
and analysis of the “cyberbanging” phenomenon’, Small Wars & Insurgencies, 24: 152–170.
Napoleoni, L. (2014). The Islamist Phoenix: The Islamic State (ISIS) and the Redrawing of the Middle East.
New York: Seven Stories Press.
Papachristos, A. V. (2005). ‘Gang world’, Foreign Policy, 147: 48–55.
Papachristos, A. V. (2013). 48 Years of Crime in Chicago: A Descriptive Analysis of Serious Crime Trends
from 1965 to 2013. New Haven, CT: Institution for Social and Policy Studies.
Papachristos, A. V. , Hureau, D. M. , and Braga, A. A. (2013). ‘The corner and the crew: The influence of
geography and social networks on gang violence’, American Sociological Review, 78: 417–447.
Patton, D. U. , Eschmann, R. D. , and Butler, D. A. (2013). ‘Internet banging: New trends in social media,
gang violence, masculinity and hip hop’, Computers in Human Behavior, 29: A54–A59.
Perešin, A. , and Cervone, A. (2015). ‘The Western Muhajirat of ISIS’, Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 38:
495–509.
Phillips, M. D. , and Kamen, E. (2014). ‘Entering the black hole: The Taliban, terrorism, and organised crime’,
Journal of Terrorism Research, 5: 39–48.
Pyrooz, D. C. , and Sweeten, G. (2015). ‘Gang membership between ages 5 and 17 years in the United
States’, Journal of Adolescent Health, 56: 414–419.
Pyrooz, D. C. , Decker, S. H. , and Moule Jr., R. K. (2015). ‘Criminal and routine activities in online settings:
Gangs, offenders, and the Internet’, Justice Quarterly, 32: 471–499.
Rosenfeld, R. (2002). ‘Why criminologists should study terrorism’, The Criminologist, 27: 1, 3–4.
Schmidt, F. (2010). ‘From Islamic warriors to drug lords: The evolution of the Taliban insurgency’,
Mediterranean Quarterly, 21: 61–77.
Short, J. F. , and Strodtbeck, F. L. (1965). Group Process and Gang Delinquency. Chicago, IL: University of
Chicago Press.
Smith, S. (2013). Chiraq [video]. Available at: https://video.vice.com/en_us/video/welcome-to-chiraq-ep-
1/55db5207cd78c0a9377b9ab1
Stephenson, S. (2015). Gangs of Russia: From the Streets to the Corridors of Power. Ithaca, NY: Cornell
University Press.
Storrod, M. L. , and Densley, J. A. (2016). ‘“Going viral” and “going country”: The expressive and
instrumental activities of street gangs on social media’, Journal of Youth Studies. Available at:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2016.1260694
Thrasher, F. M. (1927). The Gang: A Study of 1,313 Gangs in Chicago. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago
Press.
Valasik, M. , and Tita, G. E. (2018). ‘Gangs and space’. In: S. D. Johnson and G. Bruinsma , eds. The
Oxford Handbook for Environmental Criminology. New York: Oxford University Press.
Van Bergen, J. (2003). ‘In the absence of democracy: The designation and material support provisions of the
anti-terrorism laws’, Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal, 2: 107–160.
Vasquez, E. A. , Wenborne, L. , Peers, M. , Alleyne, E. , and Ellis, K. (2015). ‘Any of them will do: In-group
identification, out-group entitativity, and gang membership as predictors of group-based retribution’,
Aggressive Behavior, 41: 242–252.
Warrick, J. (2015). Black Flags: The Rise of ISIS. New York: Doubleday.
Winter, C. (2015). Women of the Islamic State: A Manifesto on Women by the Al-Khanssaa Brigade.
London: Quilliam Foundation.