IPR-II Model Answers 2014 Final
IPR-II Model Answers 2014 Final
May-2014
UNIT-I
Introduction:-
The Copyright Act, 1957 came into effect from January 1958. This Act has
been amended five times since then, i.e., in 1983, 1984, 1992, 1994 and 1999, with
the amendment of 1994 being the most substantial. Prior to the Act of 1957, the
Law of Copyrights in the country was governed by the Copyright Act of 1914.
This Act was essentially the extension of the British Copyright Act, 1911 to India.
Nature of Copyright:-
The law does not permit one to appropriate to himself what has been produced by
je labour skill and capital of another. This is the very foundation of copyrights
law. The object of copyright law is to protect the author of the copyright work
from an unlawful reproduction or exploitation of his work by others. Copyright
protection is essential to encourage exploitation of copyright work for the benefit
of the public. The exploitation is done by entrepreneurs like publishers, film
producers or sound recording producers to whom the owner of copyright the
assigns or licenses the particular rights. If the entrepreneur is to recover the capital
invested and earn profits he has to be protected from Unauthrised reproduction
otherwise a pirate would reproduce the work at a fraction of the original cost of
production and undersell the producer. In the case of sound recording and
cinematograph films a pirate could ruin the producers by his piracy. Without legal
protection for a certain period no entrepreneur will undertake publication of books
or production of sound recording or films. In ancient times creative writers,
musicians and artists wrote, composed or made their works mainly for fame and
recognition rather than to earn a living or make profits. Copying was a laborious
and expensive process. The importance of copyright protection was recognised
only after the invention of the press in the 15 th century which enabled the
reproduction of books in large numbers practicable.
Salient features of Indian Copyright Act
The Copyright Act consists of 15 chapters divided into 79 sections. Following are
the salient features of the copyright Act.
1. Chapter I contains the usual preliminary sections including the definitions. Some
new rights also came to be recognized, with the result that some new terms have
been incorporated and defined (7), (2).
3. Chapters III to VI of the Act are really the heart and they deal with the meaning
of a copyright and the works in which a copyright subsists, the ownership of a
copyright and the rights of the owner (including on assignment of the copyright),
the terms of the copyright and licences, etc. Section 13 of the Chapter III clearly
states that copyright will subsist throughout India in literary, dramatic, musical,
and artistic works. Copyright also subsists in cinematograph films and sound
recordings. The work must, however, be first published in India or the author of the
work must be a citizen of India. What exactly is the meaning and scope of a
copyright in respect of the above classes of works has been explained in Section 14
of the Chapter III. This includes interalia, reproduction, performance,
communication, translation, or adaptation of a work. Rental rights are also
recognized as a part of the copyright in a work such as a cinematograph film or a
computer programme.
4. Chapter IV of the Act concerns itself with the ownership of a copyright and the
rights of the owner. Subject to certain exceptions, the author of a work is the first
owner of the copyright. The exceptions include proprietary rights in a magazine in
which an article is first published or the commissioning of an artistic work or a
work produced under a contract of service. In case of films, the copyright vests
with the film producer. Similarly in cases of musical works recorded on
phonograph record, the copyright vests with the manufacturer of the original
master record from which other records are made. The owner of a copyright can
assign his rights there under on terms and conditions set out in a written document.
5. The term of a copyright is dealt with in Chapter V of the Act. Initially, the term
was fixed at 50 years but by an amendment to the Act with effect from 28th
December, 1991, the period was increased to 60 years. In the case of a published
literary, dramatic, musical and artistic work (other than a photograph) the period is
reckoned from the beginning of the year after the death of the author. In the case of
a photograph, cinematograph film or a sound recording the period is reckoned from
the year following the publication of the work.
6. Chapter VI of the Copyright Act deals with licencing of the copyright. The
owner of a copyright is entitled to grant any interest in the copyright by a licence
given by him in writing.
7. Chapter VII concerns itself with Copyright Societies which is a new concept so
far as the Copyright Act is concerned in as much as prior to the amendment of the
Act in 1994.
8. Chapter VIII of the Act concerns itself with the rights of broadcasting
organizations and of performers. This right subsists for 25 years beginning from
the calendar year next following the year of broadcast. An amendment made in
1999 this right now subsists for 50 years from the beginning of the calendar year
next following the year of performance. Both these rights are not absolute in as
much as these rights are deemed not to be infringed if a recording of such a
broadcast or performance is made for private use or for bona fide purposes such as
research, teaching, or as news of current events etc.
9. Chapter IX of the Act deals with a copyright obtained in a foreign country. The
applicability of the Copyright Act to foreign works is reciprocal.
10. Chapters X and XI of the Act deal with the registration and infringement of
copyright while Chapters XII to XIV deal with civil remedies and criminal
offences under the Act.
11. On the other hand, Section 52 of the Act provides that certain acts shall not
constitute an infringement of copyright. While a large number of such exceptions
have been mentioned, it may be useful to refer only to a few of them such as fair
dealing in a literary, dramatic, musical or artistic work for the purposes of private
use, criticism, or review thereof; in respect of a computer programme, making
copies there of or adaptation of the computer programme will not be an
infringement of the copyright if the purpose is to utilize the programme for which
it was supplied or to make back-up copies thereof for protection against loss or
destruction or damage.
12. Unauthorised hire and sale of copies of video films, cassette recordings for
public performances and books is regarded as violation of Copyright Laws in
India. Against such violations definite measures have been provided under the
Indian Copyright Act as amended in 1984 and 1994.
13. The civil remedies postulated by the Act are those of an injunction, damages,
and rendition of accounts, etc. The punishment for a criminal violation was,
initially, punishable with imprisonment up to a period of one year or with fine or
both but after piracy became a major problem, the period of imprisonment has
been made a minimum of six months and it may extend up to three years.
Similarly, a minimum fine of Rs.50, 000/- can be imposed which may extend up to
Rs.2, 00,000/-.
OR
Introduction:
The owner of a copyright work has the exclusive right to do certain acts in
respect of the work. If any person does any of these acts without authority he will
be committing an infringement of the copyright in the work. The nature of the
rights depends upon the nature of the work. Reproduction of the work in any
material form, performance of the work in public and communication of the work
to the public in certain forms are the usual methods by which the copyright in any
work is commercially exploited for profit. If any person without authority
commercially exploits the work for profit he will be infringing the copyright.
Meaning of infringement:-
INFRINGEMENT
a. When any person without a license from the owner of the copyright, or the
Registrar of Copyright (in certain situations) or in contravention of the
conditions of a license,
ii. knowingly permits for profit any place to be used for the performance
of the work in public which continues an infringement of the work,
or
b. When any person, makes for sale or hire, or sells or lets for hire, or offers
for sale or hire, or exhibits in public for trade or import (except two copies
other than cinematography film or record for personal use) any infringing
copies of the week.
1. reproduction for use in judicial proceedings and for use of members of the
legislature,
10.use of an artistic work (author not the owner of copyright) by the author of
any mould, cast, sketch, plan, model, etc., made by him for the work,
Copyright law does not prevent a person from taking what is useful from an
original work and create a new work with additions and improvements. Under the
guise of a copyright the owner of a copyright cannot ask the court to close all the
venues of research and scholarship and all frontiers of human knowledge.
Sections 54-62 of the copyright act deals with civil remedies and sections 63-
70 deals with the criminal remedies available to the owner of copy right for
infringement of copyright.
1. Civil remedies
(b) Damages:- there are two types of damages available to a successful plaintiff,
one under section 55 for infringement and another under section 58 for
conversion. The copyright owner is entitled to treat all in infringing copies of his
work as if they were his own property.
Accounts of profits:- the owner of copy right also have another remedy called
accounts of profits. It means the infringer has to give the profit which he has
generated during infringement of copyright.
2. Criminal remedies
In addition to civil remedy the copyright Act enabled the owner of the copyright
to take criminal proceeding against an infringer. Knowledge or means rea is an
essential ingredient of the offence. These two remedies are distinct and
independent and can be availed of simultaneously. The offence of infringement of
copyright punishable with imprisonment which may extend from a minimum
period of six month to a maximum of three years and with a fine of the order of
Rs.50,000 to Rs.2.00 lakhs. A police officer of the rank of sub-inspector and
above is given the power to seize without warrant, all infringing copies of the
work and accessories for making infringing copies wherever found, to be
produced before a magistrate.
3. Administrative remedies
JURISDICTION OF COURTS
LIMITATION
The period of limitation for filing the suit is three years from the date of
infringement.
What is essential is that the work must not be copied from another work, but
must originate from another. Copyright subsists in computer software provided
sufficient efforts and skill has been expanded to give it a new and original
character.
The computer programme consists of –source code and object code. Source
code is a computer programme written in any of the several programming language
employed by computer programmers. An object code is the version of a
programme in which the source code language code is converted or translated into
the machine language of the computer with which it is to be used. Copyright exists
in this language; it is not entirely clear whether copyright exist in source code or
object code or both.
OR
Q.no:1(b) A paper setter picks up an extract from “suitable boy” a popular
novel authored by Vikram set and asks question based on the extracts in the
English literature question paper set by him. Whether Vikram Seth can bring
an action against the paper setter for infringement? Decide.
Solution:- No, Vikram Seth cannot bring an action against the paper setter
for infringement because publication of short passages, restricted reproduction or
performance for educational purposes does not amount to infringement. Section
52(i) of the Indian Copyrights Act, 1957 says that, the reproduction of any work:
Hence, putting a question in the question paper taken from novel does not
amount to infringement of copyright and the author cannot bring an action against
the paper setter, according to Section 2(i) of the Copyrights Act 1957.
UNIT-II
Introduction:
Biodiversity encompasses the variety of all life on earth. India is one of the
17-mega diverse countries of the world. With only 2.5% of the land area, India
already accounts for 7.8% of the global recorded species. India is also rich in
traditional and indigenous knowledge, both coded and informal. India is Party to
the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) (1992). Recognizing the sovereign
rights of States to use their own biological resources, the Convention expects the
Parties to facilitate access to genetic resources by other Parties subject to national
legislation and on mutually agreed upon terms (Article 3 and 15 of CBD). After an
extensive and intensive consultation process involving the stakeholders, the Govt.
of India has brought Biological Diversity Act, 2002.
Summary of Biological Diversity Act, 2002:
Definition:-
Biodiversity is defined under Section 2(b) as, the variety and variability
among living organisms and the ecological complexes of which they are part and
includes diversity within species or between species and of ecosystems.
OR
Introduction:
Section 8 of the Bio Diversity Act deals with the establishment of a body to
be called the National Biodiversity Authority by the Central Government by
notification in the Official Gazette for the purposes of this Act, The National
Biodiversity Authority shall be a body corporate by the name aforesaid, having
perpetual succession and a common seal, with power to acquire, hold and dispose
of property, both movable and immovable, and to contract, and shall by the said
name sue and be sued. The head office of the National Biodiversity Authority
shall be at Chennai and the National Biodiversity Authority may, with the previous
approval of the Central Government, establish offices at other places in India.
Constitution of National Biodiversity Authority (NBA):
Section 18 of the Bio Diversity Act speaks especially about the functions
and powers of the Biodiversity Authority which are as follows:-
Further sections 19-21 of the Biodiversity act deals with the approval by the
National biodiversity Authority
The Authority while granting approval to any person for access or for
transfer of results of research or applying for patent and IPR or for third party
transfer of the accessed biological resource and associated knowledge may impose
terms and conditions for ensuring equitable sharing of the benefits arising out of
the use of accessed biological material and associated knowledge. No person who
has been granted approval under section 19 shall transfer any biological resource
or knowledge associated there which is the subject matter of the said approval
except with the permission of the National Biodiversity Authority 20 (1).
Meaning:-
Bio piracy means biological theft . the act of taking some bio materials from
someone unlawfully; it is illegal collection and usage of indeginous plants ect., by
international companies who patent for their uses.
For example, India’s indigenous product ‘basmati’ rice has become USA’s
patent. The process of producing “atta” or wheat flour from whole wheat was also
patented by an American company.
Definition:-
Bio piracy is defines as th theft or usurpation of genetic materials especially
Plants and other biological materials by patent process without paying fair
compensation to the people/nations in whose territory such materials were
originally discovered.
The Biological Act, 2002 provides for the following exemptions which are not
called as Bio- Piracy.
•Exemption to local people and community of the area for free access to use
biological resources within India.
•Exemption to growers and cultivators of biodiversity and to Vaids and Hakims to
use biological resources.
•Exemption through notification of normally traded commodities from the purview
of the Act.
•Exemption for collaborative research through government sponsored or
government approved institutions subject to overall policy guidelines and approval
of the Central Government.
OR
Q.No:3(a) Discuss the rights recognised for the farmer under the plant
varieties and farmer’s Right Act, 2001.
Introduction:-
India having ratified the said Final Act, has made the law on plant varieties on the
basis of section 5 of TRIPs which reads, “Members may also exclude from
patentability plants and animals other than micro-organism and essentially
biological process for the protection of plant or animals other than non-biological
and microbiological processes. However, members shall provide for the protection
of plant varieties either by patent or by an effective sui generis system or by any
combination thereof.
Chapter 6 Sections 39-46 deals with the farmer’s Rights. Following are the
rights of farmers provide under the act:-
(i) a farmer who has bred or developed a new variety shall, be entitled for
registration, and other protection in like manner as a breeder of a variety
under this Act;
(ii) the farmers’ variety shall be entitled for registration if the application
contains declaration as specified in clause (h) of sub-section (1) of Section
18;
The explanation for the purposes of clause (iv), says that, “branded
seed” means any seed put in a package or any other container and labeled in
a manner indicating that such seed is of a variety protected under this Act.
Where any claim is made under sub-section (1), the center notified under
that sub-section may verify the claim made by such person or group of person or
such governmental or non-governmental organisation in such manner as it deems
fit, and if it is satisfied that such village or local community has contributed
significantly to the evolution the variety which has been registered under this Act,
it shall report its findings to the Authority.
When the Authority, on a report under sub-section (2) is satisfied, after such
inquiry as it may deem fit, that the variety with which the report is related has been
registered under the provisions of this Act, it may issue notice in the prescribed
manner to the breeder of that variety and after providing opportunity to such
breeder to file objection in the prescribed manner and of being heard, it may
subject to any limit notified by the Central Government, by order, grant such sum
of compensation to be paid to a person or group of persons or governmental or
non-governmental organisation which has made claim under sub-section (1), as it
may deem fit.
OR
Introduction:-
Section 15 of the Plant varieties and farmer’s Right Act says that, a new
variety shall be registered if it conforms to the criteria of novelty, distinctiveness,
uniformity and stability. An extra variety shall be registrable under this act within a
specified period if it conforms to such criteria of distinctiveness, uniformity and
stability as shall be specified under the regulation.
Section 14 to 23 of the plant varieties and Farmer’s Right act speaks about
procedure for Registration of Plant varieties and essentially Derived Variety. The
following is the procedure for registration.
(c) Any person being the assignee of the breeder of the variety in respect of
the right to make such application; or
(2) An application under sub-section (1) may be made by any of the persons
referred to therein individually or jointly with any other person.
(2) The Authority shall, having regard to the provisions of any international
convention or treaty to which India has become a party, make regulation
governing the assignment of denomination to a variety.
(3) Where the denomination assigned to the variety does not satisfy the
requirement specified in the regulations, the Registrar may require the
applicant to propose another denomination within such time as may be
specified by such regulations.
(4) Notwithstanding anything contained in the Trade .Marks Act, 1999 (47
of 1999) denomination assigned to a variety shall not be registered as a trade
mark under that Act.
(e) contain a complete passport data of the parental lines from which the
variety has been derived along with the geographical location in India from
where the genetic material has been taken and all such information relating
to the contribution, if any, of any farmer, village community, institution or
organisation in breeding, evolving or developing the variety;
Provided that in case where the application is for the registration of farmers’
variety, nothing contained in clauses (b) to (i) shall apply in respect of the
application and the application shall be in such form as may be prescribed.
(2) Every application referred to in sub-section (1) shall be filed in the office
of the Registrar.
(1) Every applicant shall, along with the application for registration made under
this Act, make available to the Registrar such quantity of seed of a variety for
registration of which such application is made, for the purpose of conducting tests
to evaluate whether seed of such variety along with the parental material conform
to the standards as may be specified by regulations :
Provided that the Registrar or any person or test center to whom such seed has
been sent for conducting test shall keep such seed during his or its possession in
such manner and in such condition that its viability and quantity shall remain
unaltered.
(2) The applicant shall deposit such fees as may be prescribed for conducting
tests referred to in sub-section (1).
(3) The tests, referred to in sub-section (1) shall be conducted in such manner
and by such method as may be prescribed.
(1) On receipt of an application under Section 14, the Registrar may, after
making such inquiry as he thinks fit with respect to the particulars contained in
such application, accept the application absolutely or subject to such conditions or
limitations as he deems fit.
(2) Where the Registrar is satisfied that the application does not comply with
the requirements of this Act or any rules or regulations made thereunder, he may,
either-
Provided that no application shall be rejected unless the applicant has been
given a reasonable opportunity of presenting his case.
The Registrar shall consider all the grounds on which the application has
been opposed and after giving reasons for his decision, by order, uphold or reject
the opposition.
Section 45 of the Plant Varieties and Farmer’s Right Act deals with
establishment of national gene fund.
(1) The Central Government shall constitute a Fund to be called the National
Gene Fund and there shall be credited thereto-
(a) the benefit sharing received in the prescribed manner from the breeder of
a variety or an essentially derived variety registered under this Act, or
propagating material of such variety or essentially derived variety, as the
case may be;
(b) the annual fee payable to the Authority by way of royalty under sub-
section (4) of Section 35;
(c) the compensation deposited in the Gene Fund under sub-section (4) of
Section 41;
(d) the contribution from any national and international organisation and
other sources.
(2) The Gene Fund shall, in the prescribed manner, be applied for meeting-
(a) any amount to be paid by way of benefit sharing under sub-section (5) of
Section 26;
(c) the expenditure for supporting the conservation and sustainable use of
genetic resources including in-situ and ex-situ collections and for
strengthening the capability of the Panchayat in carrying out such
conservation and sustainable use;
(d) the expenditure of the schemes relating to benefit sharing framed under
Section 46.
OR
(a) who, not being the breeder of a variety registered under this Act or a
registered agent or a registered licensee of that variety, sells, exports, imports or
produces such variety without the permission of its breeder or within the scope
of a registered licence or registered agency without permission of the registered
licensee or registered agent.
(b) who uses, sells exports, imports or produces any other variety giving
such variety, the denomination identical with or deceptively similar to the
denomination of a variety registered under this Act in such manner as to
cause confusion in the mind of general people in identifying the registered
variety.
A suit for the infringement of a variety registered under the Act; or relating
to any right in a variety registered under this Act, shall be instituted in any
court inferior to a District Court having jurisdiction to try the suit. “District
Court having jurisdiction” means the District Court within the local limits of
whose jurisdiction of the cause of action arises.
The relief which a court may grant in any suit for infringement referred to in
Section 65 includes:-
(ii) Damages or
(c) Attachment of such property of the defendant which the court deems
necessary to recover damages, costs or other pecuniary remedies which may
be finally awarded to the plaintiff
UNIT-IV
Introduction:
Protecting and enforcing intellectual property rights remains one of the most
acute legal challenges facing domestic and international businesses. An industrial
design is the ornamental or aesthetic aspect of an article. Industrial designs are
applied to a wide variety of products of industry and handicrafts from technical and
medical instruments to watches, jewelry, and other luxury items; from house wares
and electrical appliances to vehicles and architectural structures; from textile
designs to leisure goods. As these designs consist of the aesthetic features they do
not provide any protection to the technical features of the article.
Meaning of Designs:-
Definition of Design:-
Section 2(d) of the Indian Designs Act 2000 defines “Designs” as follows.
The patterns and Designs act was the first designs legislation in India
enacted by British rulers. The Act provided the inventors of new patterns and
designs in India, the exclusive, privilege of making, selling and using the invention
in India or authorizing others to do so for the shorter duration of time. The Act
1872 was followed by the inventions and Designs Act 1888 which consolidated
and amended the la relating to the protection to inventions and designs and
contained provisions relating to designs in a separate part. The Act of 1888 was
replaced by the British patents and Designs Act 1907, which increased the
maximum term of protection to 15 years. Where in a remedy for groundless threats
of infringements proceedings was introduced and provisions requiring article to be
marked was relaxed. The British patents and designs Act 1907 which became the
basis of the Indian patents and Designs act 1911. The Patents Act 1907 replaced
the patent provisions of the 1911 Act. The Designs Act f 1911 was governing the
field of industrial Designs.
Since the enactments of the 1911 Act considerable progress has been made
in the field of science and technology. Hence the legal system for the protection of
industrial designs required to ne made more efficient and compatible with the
current requirement and standard in order to ensure effective protection to
registered designs. It was also essential to promote design activity in order to
promote the design element in an article of production. Since 1911 a number of
extensive amendments have been made in the Designs Act. In the mean time
Indian made tremendous progress in the field of science and technology. There has
been increase in the industrial designs and as well the registration of designs. To
provide more effective protection to registered designs and to promote designs
activity in order to promote designs element in an article of production it has
become necessary to make the legal system of providing protection to industrial
designs more efficient. It is also intended to ensure that the law does not
unnecessarily extend protection beyond what is necessary to create the required
incentive for design activity while removing impediments to the free use of
available designs. To achieve these objectives and in order to repeal the designs
Act 1911, the Designs Act 2000 was enacted by parliament.
The main aim of the Designs Act of 2000 is to cope up with the increase in
the registration of designs and to encourage the progress in industrial growth. The
act helps to prevent the pinning down of competitors which would block
technological growth. With reference to the definition of the term design under
section 2(d) of the Designs Act, 2000 the following features have been added:
Hence, the designs Act, of 2000 does not include the trade and the property
mark alone also includes the “article works”, therefore the definition under the
act of 2000 is an improved one and more comprehensive.
Further the Act of 2000 enhances the initial period of registration from 5 to
10 years, to be followed by further extension of a period of 5 years, while the
Act of 1911 gives a protection of 5 years. Thus it can be seen that the Act of
2000 is far more superior and efficient which encourages technological growth
in India. India has adopted the ‘first to file’ system, which means that the right
holder should file the application on the earliest point of time to rule out the
possibility of any other person claiming for the right of the intended designs.
OR
Introduction:
(1) For the purpose of sale, to apply the design is registered or any fraudulent or
obvious imitation thereof, except with the licence or written consent of the
registered proprietor, or to do anything with a view to enable the design to
be so applied; or
(2) To import for the purposes of sale, without the consent of the registered
proprietor, any article belonging to the class in which the design has been
registered, and having applied to it the design or any fraudulent or obvious
imitation thereof; or
(3) Knowing that the design or any fraudulent or obvious imitation thereof has
been applied to any article in any class of articles in which the design is
registered without the consent of the registered proprietor, to publish or
expose or cause to be published or exposed for sale that article.
Any of the aforesaid acts shall constitute piracy only when it is committed
during the existence of copyright in any design. Further, it is necessary that the
acts constituting piracy should have been done for the purpose of sale, and not
merely for private or personal use. It is further required that the forbidden acts
have been done in relation to any article in any class of goods in which the
design is registered, and not in relation to other class of goods.
A suit for infringement or any other proceeding for relief has to be filled in
the district court having jurisdiction in such case. However, where the
defendants invoke any of the grounds on which the registration of a design may
be cancelled the court shall transfer the suit or such other proceeding to the
High Court for decision.
Following are the remedies available to the plaintiff for piracy of registered
design:-
Copyright in Design:-
Chapter VII Sections 32-36 of the Indian Designs Act, 2000 deals with
powrs and duites of controller which are as follows:-
Subject to any rules made in this behalf, the Controller in any proceedings
before him under this Act shall have the powers of a civil court for the purpose
receiving evidence, administering oaths, enforcing the attendance of witnesses,
compelling the discovery and production of documents, issuing commissions for
the examining of witnesses and awarding costs and such award shall be executable
in any court having jurisdiction as if it were a decree of that court.
(1) The Controller may refuse to register a design of which the use would, in
his opinion, be contrary to public order or morality.
(2) An appeal shall lie to the High Court from an order of the Controller under
this section.
(2) In calculating the said period of three months, the time (if any) occupied in
granting a copy of the order appealed against shall be excluded.
(3) The High Court may, if it thinks fit, obtain the assistance of an expert in
deciding such appeals, and the decision of the High Court shall be final.
(4) The High Court my make rules consistent with this Act as to the conduct
and procedure of all proceedings under this Act before it.
UNIT-V
Introduction
The Earth's biological resources are vital to humanity's economic and social
development. As a result, there is a growing recognition that biological diversity is
a global asset of tremendous value to present and future generations. At the same
time, the threat to species and ecosystems has never been as great as it is today.
Species extinction caused by human activities continues at an alarming rate.
Objectives:-
3. The Convention recognizes for the first time, that the conservation of biological
diversity is "a common concern of humankind" and an integral part of the
development process.
4. The Convention recognizes that all humanity has an interest ensuring the
conservation of biological diversity, including poor nations, women and
indigenous people, and that it needs to be addressed by concerted international
action.
8. The Convention encourages throughout its text the cooperation and coordination
between member countries, particularly with respect to North-South relationships.
These provisions seek to prevent the exploitation of ecologically-rich countries by
economically-rich countries.
9. The governing body of the CBD is the Conference of the Parties (COP). This
ultimate authority of all governments (or Parties) that have ratified the treaty meets
every two years to review progress, set priorities and commit to work plans.
10. In 2010, Parties to the CBD adopted the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011–
2020, a ten-year framework for action by all countries and stakeholders to
safeguard biodiversity and the benefits it provides to people.
12. The Convention puts much emphasis on the exchange of information and the
cooperation between countries. To help these processes, the CBD has set up an
international network of partners called the Clearing-House Mechanism (CHM).
This website contributes to the CHM network by illustrating what Belgium is
doing in the framework of the CBD.
OR
Introduction:-
2. Part II of the TRIPS agreement speaks about scope and use of Intellectual
Property Rights. Intellectual Property Rights i.e. copyright and Related Rights (art
9-14), Trade Marks ( Art 15-21) Geographical Indication (Art 22-24), Industrial
Designs (Art 25&26), Patents (Art 27 -34), Layout–designs of Integrated Circuits
(Art 35-38) and Protection of Undisclosed Information (Art-39) are discussed
separately in succeeding chapters.
Berne Convention
The Berne Convention is the principal treaty protecting the Authors and
Composers of Music and the same was last amended on September 28, 1979, the
convention says about the rights enjoyed by the authors/composers like right to
authorise, prohibit reproduction, adoption, etc., and provides for the limitations and
exemptions to the different rights and works confirmed on the performers,
Producers of Phonograms (Sound recording) under its provisions, it also allows the
ratified countries to provide exemptions to the protections confirmed on the
authors, performers and producers. The Convention specifically speaks of Fair
Use. The Berne Convention is ratified by 164 countries.
The need for a uniform system led to the formulation and adoption on September
9, 1886, of the Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works.
The Berne Convention is the oldest international treaty in the field of copyright. It
is open to all States. Instruments of accession or ratification are deposited with the
Director General of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO).
The Berne Convention has been revised several times in order to improve
the international system of protection which the Convention provides. Changes
have been effected in order to cope with the challenges of accelerating
development of technologies in the field of utilization of authors’ works, in order
to recognize new rights as also to allow for appropriate revisions of established
ones. The first major revision took place in Berlin in 1908, and this was followed
by the revisions in Rome in 1928, in Brussels in 1948, in Stockholm in 1967 and in
Paris in 1971.
The Convention rests on three basic principles. Firstly, there is the principle
of “national treatment”, according to which works originating in one of the
member States are to be given the same protection in each of the member States as
these grant to works of their own nationals .Secondly, there is automatic
protection, according to which such national treatment not dependent on any
formality; in other words protection is granted automatically and is not subject to
the formality of registration, deposit or the like. Thirdly, there is independence of
protection, according to which enjoyment and exercise of the rights granted is
independent of the existence of protection in the country of origin of the work.
One of the important provisions is the one that covers works or expressions
of what is called “folklore.” Without mentioning the word, the Convention
provides that any member country may give protection to unpublished works
where the identity of the author is unknown, but where there is every ground to
presume that the author is a national of that country, by designating, through the
national legislation, the competent authority which should represent the author of
unknown identity and protect and enforce his rights in the countries party to the
Convention. By providing for the bringing of actions by authorities designated by
the State, the Berne Convention offers to countries whose folklore is a part of their
heritage, a possibility of protecting it.
OR
History
During the last century, before the existence of any international convention
in the field of industrial property, it was difficult to obtain protection for industrial
property rights in the various countries of the world because of the diversity of
their laws. Moreover, patent applications had to be made roughly at the same time
in all countries in order to avoid a publication in one country destroying the
novelty of the invention in the other countries. These practical problems created a
strong desire to overcome such difficulties.
Principal Provisions
The provisions of the Paris Convention may be sub-divided into four main
categories: -
1. National Treatment:
The first category contains rules of substantive law which guarantee a basic
right known as the right to national treatment in each of the member countries.
National treatment means that, as regards the protection of industrial property, each
country party to the Paris Convention must grant the same protection to nationals
of the other member countries as it grants to its own nationals. The relevant
provisions are contained in Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention.
2. Right of priority:-
The second category establishes another basic right known as the right of
priority. The right of priority means that, on the basis of a regular application for
an industrial property right filed by a given applicant in one of the member
countries, the same applicant (or its or his successor in title) may, within a
specified period of time (six or 12 months), apply for protection in all the other
member countries. These later applications will then be regarded as if they had
been filed on the same day as the earliest application. Hence, these later
applications enjoy a priority status with respect to all applications relating to the
same invention filed after the date of the first application. They also enjoy a
priority status with respect to all acts accomplished after that date which would
normally be apt to destroy the rights of the applicant or the patentability of his
invention. The provisions concerning the right of priority are contained in Article 4
of the Convention.
4. Administrative framework:-
The fourth category deals with the administrative framework which has been
set up to implement the Convention, and includes the final clauses of the
Convention.