MicroCurrent HVLD Technology Whitepaper
MicroCurrent HVLD Technology Whitepaper
Container Closure Integrity (CCI) is defined by whether a container maintains the sterile barrier. If there is a leak or breach
of the sterile barrier, environmental contaminants can rapidly convert a life saving treatment into a microbial soup.
Parenteral products are the highest risk of all package formats. Vials, ampoules and prefilled syringes have the highest
potential for microbial growth, and the risk to the end patient amplifies the focus needed on CCI for these applications.
Historically there have been a variety of test methods used for parenteral CCI testing. The use of less sensitive and archaic
methods has evolved to better procedures and newer technologies. There is still a level of misinformation and a reliance on
probabilistic solutions for CCI testing of high risk parenteral products. Regulatory bodies have initiated the shift to more
deterministic test methodologies that can be controlled, calibrated and provide a definitive determination of CCI.
High voltage leak detection (HVLD) has been a common technology on the market for decades. The latest evolution of HVLD,
PTI’s patent pending MicroCurrent technology, aims to achieve a high level of CCI assurance across the entire range of
parenteral products. High voltage leak detection is a method included in USP 1207 as a deterministic test methodology and
is an established and reliable solution for all liquid filled parenteral products.
TRADITIONAL METHODS
The dye ingress and microbial ingress methods have been traditional methods deployed for parenteral CCI.
The ability to detect defects varies greatly, and there is no global standard to perform these methods. USP 1207 has clearly
outlined these methods as probabilistic and for good reason.
While vials and ampoules do have the physical requirements to perform an ingress test, the method does not provide the
certainty of detecting critical defects. For package formats such as a prefilled syringe or cartridge, the lack of internal
headspace makes these methods even less effective. The general probabilistic nature of these methods is exacerbated by the
difference in physical properties of each package type. With a method that has a variable probability of detection there is one
fundamental question, how can it be validated? The simple answer is that both the blue dye and microbial methods struggle to
produce validation worthy test results befitting of high risk
packaging applications.
The blue dye ingress method and the microbial ingress method can be largely described as qualitative in nature, with a simple
pass/fail result. The destructive nature of the test makes test results finite despite the probabilistic nature of the result, making
it almost certain that at some point batch release data will be inaccurate, sending good product out to market or issuing a flurry
of remedial actions based on a false reject.
The container is placed horizontally on a rotating stage. While rotating the container, high
voltage is applied to one side of the container and a ground probe on the opposing side.
If the package has no leak, the two container walls (high voltage side and ground side)
detection
provide full electrical resistance and no significant current is measured passing through the
electrode MicroCurrent HVLD
vial. If there is a micro-leak or crack in one of the container walls, the break-down
resistance is reached and the current passes through.
HVLD is the only leak detection technology that does not require mass
to pass through a defect site, requiring only the passage of electricity
through a crack. This characteristic makes HVLD sensitive to leaks in
which most leak test solutions cannot identify.