Design Guidelines
Design Guidelines
DESIGN GUIDELINES
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION Page 3
DESIGN GUIDELINES
1. Campus Master Plan Page 11
2. Pre-Construction Design Deliverable Page 12
3. Drawing Numbering Page 13
4. Room Numbering Page 16
5. Storm Water Drainage & Surface Water Procedures Page 18
6. Campus Sustainability Page 28
7. Campus Metering Page 44
8. Campus Accessibility Page 45
9. Gender Neutral Restroom Requirements Page 56
10. Custodial Planning and Design Page 57
11. Learning Spaces Planning and Design Page 60
12. Laboratory Planning and Design (pending issuance) Page 61
13. Keyless Access and Security (pending issuance) Page 62
TECHNICAL STANDARDS
Refer to Table of Content in “NAU Technical Standards”, which can be found at
https://www4.nau.edu/cas/Plan-Dev/TechStandards-MAIN.html
RECEIPT ACKNOLEDGEMENT
Design Professional’s and Contractor’s acknowledgement of receiving NAU Design
Guidelines and Technical Standards
On each project, the DP and the General Contractor shall acknowledge receiving, reading and
following NAU Design Guidelines and Technical Standards by completing and signing below:
In the event of a conflict between NAU Design Guidelines and NAU Technical Standards, please
contract NAU Project Manager for clarification on how to proceed with the design.
Project #: ___________________________________
DESIGN PROFESSIONAL:
Signature: ___________________________________
Date: ___________________________________
GENERAL CONTRACTOR:
Signature: ___________________________________
Date: ___________________________________
INTRODUCTION
These Design Guidelines, along with the NAU Technical Standards, cover all NAU construction and
renovation projects. They are intended to assist architects, engineers, other design professionals,
contractors and university staff in understanding the preferences of University in the development,
maintenance and repair of its facilities:
Those persons at Northern Arizona University who manage projects, to assure that the standards
and procedures outlined in this manual are implemented in the projects that are built on campus.
Those persons involved with facilities on NAU Campus. Such persons can include, but are not
limited to, administrators, user-groups, faculty, staff, trades-people, suppliers, vendors,
University construction and maintenance shop personnel, etc.
The Design Professionals, to use as their guide in preparing all necessary documents and
submittals.
The CM@R’s, General Contractors, Subcontractors, Suppliers, to use as a cross-reference with DP
provided Specifications and as their guide in procuring all materials for the project. In case of
conflict between these Design Guidelines and Technical Standards, these entities shall bring it up
to NAU Project Manager for be evaluated with the Construction Project Team.
The Design Professionals are advised to refer to those sections of the manual that relate to their
projects and to adhere to its guidelines.
These Design Guidelines and Technical Standards are intended to create a common basis for the
design, construction, maintenance, renovation and general care of facilities on NAU campus. The
standards are the result of years of experience in designing, building, and operating facilities on the
campuses, with a historical knowledge of what has served the University well. As such, they form the
preference and knowledge base for all facilities on the campus. It should be clearly understood by all
persons using these standards that they are not specification documents, nor are they procedures for
construction. Design and document preparation continue to be the design professional’s
responsibility. Means, methods, techniques, and procedures remain the Contractor’s responsibility.
These standards represent the preferred construction products, materials, details and systems to use
in the development of programs, plans, specifications and construction documents. Components
shall be selected through pre-qualification guidelines including, but not necessarily limited to,
performance characteristics, code/regulatory compliance, maintenance control, and inventory
standardization.
These standards represent the intent of the University to address the following primary criteria while
providing optimal life cycle cost benefit to the University:
Safety
Reliability
Maintainability
Efficiency
Sustainability
Building Codes
The requirements in this document do not supersede any applicable building codes. These
requirements are in addition to all applicable codes, ordinances, statutes, regulations, and laws. If
there is a conflict with any requirements in the design guidelines or in the Technical Standards, the
applicable building codes take precedence.
Refer to Div. 1 Section 01 41 13 for all applicable codes adopted by Northern Arizona University.
The NAU Variance Requests Procedure can be found on the Capital Assets and Services website
under the following link: (link is pending – please contact Project Manager for further assistance)
Design professionals and Contractors must adhere to the Design Guidelines and Technical Standards
in all cases, however, the intent of these Design Guidelines and Technical Standards is not to limit
creative solutions. In order to deviate from these Design Guidelines and Technical Standards, a
written substitution authorization must be obtained from NAU.
Substitutions to the Design Guidelines and Technical Standards must be requested in writing by the
Design Professionals to the NAU Project Manager.
NAU Project Manager must then obtain written approval for the substitution from CAS Management
(Manager of Planning & Design or Manager of Construction), with recommendation from NAU
Trades, as necessary.
The University will consider requests for substitutions in order to provide the best benefit to the
University and will typically require a life cycle cost analysis to be completed as part of the
substitution process.
Written authorization shall be received prior to incorporation of the proposed substitution into the
documents. The substitution must be made as early as possible but no later than completion of the
design development phase.
Refer to Section 00440 is for Product/Material Substitution Form. This form can also be found on
the CAS website under the Technical Standards Division 0 (https://www4.nau.edu/cas/Plan-
Dev/TechStandards-MAIN.html)
Updates
These Design Guidelines and Technical Standards are intended to be a continually evolving
document. As new systems, components and techniques become available and they are deemed
appropriate for use as a standard, they will be incorporated into these documents.
The technical content of this manual represents the culmination of input from many design,
construction and maintenance professionals, included but not limited to NAU Trades Supervisors,
NAU Project Managers and DP/CMARs who performed projects for the University in the past.
Although it is felt that this effort produced a more up to date listing of NAU Technical Standards, it is
realized that improvements are always possible and that many iterations may be required to achieve
perfection.
To pursue this goal, please feel free to submit any recommendations for improvements via email to
NAU, addressed to [email protected].
This manual will be updated as requirements and procedures of NAU and the Arizona Board of
Regents (ABOR) change.
1. Ask Questions
Although your team was chosen as best suited to the project, this may be the first project of
this particular building type you have undertaken at NAU. Time spent in researching the goals
NAU had in mind when preparing the RFQ, familiarity with campus infrastructures, how and
why design was handled in a particular way on a similar project, and familiarity with the
University and user group structure prior to the beginning of architectural programming, will
be invaluable to your Design Team. The CAS Project Manager assigned the responsibility to
lead this project on behalf of NAU is your single point of contact for the project.
All questions and communications regarding this project, the user group or the University
must be routed through the NAU Project Manager. This is the established project protocol,
ad will be further detailed to you by those individuals. It is their responsibility to answer, or
direct you to those that can answer specific questions regarding any topic connected with the
project in a timely and professional manner.
3. Contingencies
Some Design Professionals may be under the impression that project contingencies (design,
construction and inflation) are for the use of design “extras”. This is an erroneous and
dangerous impression. NAU is mandated by the Arizona Board of Regents to carry
contingencies based on level of functional and construction difficulties and total project
duration. Contingencies shall only be utilized to attain the projects critical, functional and
quality parameters, or “base” scope, as defined by the architectural program and subsequent
schematic design.
4. Expectations
The Design Team is required to be within the particular design phase budget, and if the
project estimate at the completion of a particular phase indicates the design is over budget,
the team will not gain the approval necessary to enter into the next phase. The team will then
be required to expend the necessary time and effort to be within that budget, at the Design
Team’s expense.
It is easy to recognize that the further over budget the design is, the more time and effort will
be required to bring the project within the budget. This is time that will not be compensated.
It is therefore in the best interest of the Design Team to obtain the highest degree of detail
appropriate to all phases of design, to recognize all cost ramifications to particular design
intent, and avoid promotion and pursuit of design elements that can neither be justified by
the program nor afforded by the particular phase budget.
It is the University’s expectation that by following the guidelines, procedures and advice as presented
in this manual, the Design Team will produce a facility that not only meets program, budget and
schedule, but also achieves a quality of design excellence.
2. NAU UTILITIES
The Manager of Utilities (Lindsay Wagner) shall be consulted for:
a. Location of existing utilities
b. Location of point of connection for any new utility
c. Coordination of any new utility layout
d. Optimization of building orientation on proposed site based on energy modeling
e. Review of proposed mechanical systems
f. Review of all energy modeling
g. Submittal to ACC (Arizona Corporation Commission) for Natural Gas scope of work
During the Plan Review process, NAU Trades Supervisor will assist in the plan review effort by
bringing up questions/comments regarding longevity, maintenance requirements, accessibility
of construction materials and building systems.
The University is now issuing Permits and Certificate of Occupancy, and depending on the scope
and size of the project, you might be subject to it. Please contact the Lead Building Inspector
(via NAU CAS Project Manager) to confirm if this project will be subject to issuance of a Permit
and a Certificate of Occupancy.
Prior to starting Construction on Campus, the Contractor shall submit a Site Logistics Plan
showing site fencing, site access (including Emergency Access point during construction), jobsite
trailer location, temporary parking, and showing how the construction of this project will affect
circulation on Campus (truck route).
This group shall review and sign-off on the Site Plan (permanent scope) prior to design
completion and Site Logistics Plan (interim) prior to start of construction thru NAU CAS formal
Plan Review process. The DP is responsible for submittals and incorporation of any comments
received regarding the Site Plan.
It is highly recommended to schedule a meeting with NAU PD and NAU FM to ensure that all
Emergency Response parties are familiar with access to the construction site.
DESIGN GUIDELINES
1. CAMPUS MASTER PLAN
In 2010, NAU committed Ayers Saint Gross as Design Professional to update the Campus Master
Plan. Lots of thoughts and efforts were put in this Plan, involving key players within the
University (Students, Faculty, Staff, Administration) and within the Flagstaff Community (City of
Flagstaff) and it is expected that any Design professional working on this Campus will get
familiar with the 2010 Campus Master Plan.
Northern Arizona University Campus Master Plan is available on line:
https://www4.nau.edu/cas/Plan-Dev/2010%20Campus%20Master%20Plan.html
Design Professionals are required to provide the utmost complete drawings and specifications
set to allow for minimum request for information during construction.
Contractors are expected to do a thorough review of these documents prior to construction for
coordination purposes and to report any conflicts, incomplete information, etc… to also
prevent last minute changes in the field during construction.
At a minimum, the Design Professional and the Contractor shall provide, during the Pre-
Construction Phase, all documents listed in their contract agreement. Refer to Design
Professional contract and its associated exhibits, for the specific deliverables applicable to your
firm’s effort on this project.
3. DRAWING NUMBERING
The intent of these drawing numbering standards is to provide a set of documents that are
consistent with the needs of Northern Arizona University for both Capital Assets and Services
and future construction, and are consistent from one project to another.
TEXT
Text size must be legible and appropriate to the graphic information presented and
the intended plotted scale of the drawing. Text must be in all upper case letters
throughout the drawing.
Text usually should not touch other graphic objects, and must be placed with enough
space around it to be legible when the drawing is plotted and reproduced.
TITLE BLOCKS
The title block should be placed in paper scale, with its insertion point inserted at a coordinate
location of (0, 0, 0), and at a scale of 1:1. Depending on the purpose of the drawing, whether it
is for facility documentation or construction, the drawing’s title block should contain certain
essential information that CAS needs, to store and retrieve each drawing in its library.
Project Information
Project Number - assigned by the CAS Planning and Development Department
Project Name - assigned by the CAS Planning and Development Department
Firm Name - representing the drawing author
Building Name and Building Number - specify only if the project name does not
include this information already, and the project is building specific.
Drawing Information
Drawing Title - indicating the drawing content, e.g. floor plan, section, detail, etc.
CAS Project Number – shall be referenced on all sheets
Drawing Number
CD-ROM LABELING
All CDs are to be labeled as follows:
DATE – The date when the submittal was delivered to the campus for final acceptance.
PROJECT – Title of the project name and project number.
SUBMITTAL – Project submittal phase (i.e. 50% schematic, etc.).
BLDG NUMBERS – Building number identified by the campus specific to the project.
COMPANY – Name of design professional firm for the project.
SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
4. ROOM NUMBERING
Before beginning with numbering obtain the building number and address from NAU PM in
charge of the project.
All drawings issued for construction shall contain accepted room numbers so that all affected
equipment including but not limited to doors, electrical panels, telephone backboards, air
distribution devices, as-built information, and air balance reports will not have to be cross-
referenced or revised during construction or after occupancy of the space.
New buildings and additions shall adhere to the following room numbering protocol:
1. Room numbers shall begin at the elevator or main floor access: assigned sequentially
in a counterclockwise fashion from right to left.
2. Room numbers consist of 3 primary digits.
3. The first digit shall identify the floor level, with the ground floor always level 1.
Basement levels will be treated as a special case.
4. The second and third digits shall be used to sequentially identify rooms on a floor level
(01 to 99).
5. A fourth digit may be employed as a suffix to the 100 level to describe restrooms,
electrical and mechanical rooms, elevator control rooms, custodial and storage closets
or stairwells.
a. Offices on a corridor shall be numbered using an alphanumeric fourth digit.
b. Executive and administrative offices shall not be identified using a fourth
alphanumeric digit but shall receive a unique 3 digit room number.
6. Corridors, vestibules, and open office areas shall be numbered as rooms.
7. Rooms within a room (second order) shall be consecutively labeled alphabetically in a
counterclockwise manner from right to left (i.e. 302A, 302B, etc.). Additional interior
rooms (third order) shall be sequentially numbered in the same fashion (i.e.302A1,
302A2, etc.).
8. Rooms with specific uses and unique spaces may be designated by their room type
followed by a number or an alpha numeral per the building user’s request (i.e. “Studio
A”). These designations shall be determined in schematic design if possible.
An effort shall be made to maintain consistent room numbers for similar elements on each
floor (i.e. for restrooms occurring in the same location on each floor use a common room
number format and the same ending digits).
Scheduled door number references should match the room number to which it enters. For
rooms with more than one doorway, drawings shall designate unique reference numbers for all
doors associated. Door reference numbers may use -00 suffix as needed.
Use three digits: zero plus the building number (i.e. 016 for Building 16). Any building numbers
with an alpha numeric character will carry four digits including the alpha (i.e. 016A for Building
16A).
In every case, a suffix is used to indicate the floor level preceded by a dash. Door order for
multiple doors to the same floor shall be appended with a dash, (i.e. 016-1-1). Mechanical
rooms that have only exterior doors will use 01 order notation (i.e. 016-1-01).
At completion of the 100 percent Design Development (DD) drawing set, the Design Team shall
contact Ramon Bazurto and the NAU PM to review room/door numbering for final approval
prior to the start of the Construction Drawing preparation.
DESIGN INTENT
In the Southwest and at Northern Arizona University, attitudes toward storm water drainage is
changing. Previous efforts to manage site storm water drainage have consisted of collecting
and channeling storm water as quickly and efficiently to drainage ways to remove any water
from a site. Water was metered into drainage ways to minimize flooding with flows limited by
the calculated predevelopment peak flows for the site. Large storm water drainage ways were
constructed and during storm events, these drainage ways flow swiftly and remove potentially
useful water from the campus.
Now storm water is considered a resource. The new goal is to provide the structures necessary
to make use of storm water through harvesting; and infiltrating water, keeping water onsite
wherever possible.
Storm water drainage management also includes the LEED goals of water collection and onsite
reuse. The entire project area needs to be considered for opportunities to collect and store
storm water for irrigation. These features must also be designed to withstand the stress of
freezing and thawing that are a reality on our Flagstaff Mountain campus.
Within a project’s design process, managing the storm water drainage should be a key part of
the integrated site design promoting proactive solutions that are consistent with or exceed
regulatory standards. Given current limited storm drain and land capacities, some of the
mitigation of past and future storm water drainage issues at the Northern Arizona University
should occur on a project by project basis.
Projects will be expected to include retention and infiltration facilities to contain the first inch
of precipitation at a minimum. Additional retention may be added to address problems
elsewhere on campus. The designer is to consult with the Northern Arizona University CAS
Director of Utilities for guidance on providing retention on a site by site basis.
Ways to store and reuse storm water may include such elements as mini retention basins or
large retention basin, designed as landscaped areas to promote students gathering and shall
not include any concrete.
The existing site area and adjacent areas within 500 feet of the project, and include all
areas which may contribute storm water (watershed) to the proposed site.
The general area where the site is located, for example, the campus historical core,
North Campus, South Campus, etc.
Evaluation of existing landscapes, plant palette, formal, informal, historic, ornamental
and introduced plants.
Evaluation of the contextual setting of the site.
Utility (below/at grade) corridors, emergency routes, pedestrian and automobile core
circulation routes.
Identified project building expansion and proposed expansion adjacent to the project
site.
Evaluation of adjacent facility parking, vehicular and service accesses.
Whenever possible, site development should not diminish the quality or increase the
quantity or rate of storm water drainage flow that leaves the site in its existing
condition. Potential increased storm water drainage flows should be mitigated on-site
if possible.
Downstream conveyance impacts must be evaluated and mitigated to prevent the
hazards associated with overflows, pounding and ice formation.
Wherever possible, site development should include strategies such that the storm
water flow does not diminish in quality or increase in quantity when compared to the
level of the original natural condition of the site. This can be achieved through the use
of landscape features and water harvesting.
Opportunities for water harvesting should be specifically discussed in conceptual
narratives in early design stages. “The City of Flagstaff Low Impact Development:
Guidance Manual for Site Design and Implementation, 2009” should be used for the
design basis. (http://www.flagstaffstormwater.com/index.aspx?NID=8)
Site development should meet or exceed all applicable regulatory standards. The
intent is to meet at a minimum the current City of Flagstaff storm water drainage
standards and exceed them where possible, and to demonstrate innovative
techniques for which the City may not have applicable standards.
Retention of storm water: the conveyance and retention capacity shall be sufficient to
collect and store the first inch of precipitation that falls onsite for a typical rainstorm.
Plans will incorporate: conservation of natural areas, minimizing disturbance of
natural drainages, minimizing and disconnecting impervious surfaces, and minimizing
soil compaction. Many of these points require consideration of construction methods,
site access and control of the site areas that are not intended for development, during
construction.
All project sites shall include areas designed to collect and infiltrate water which may
include swales, buffer strips, porous pavements, bio-retention, sedimentation and
extended detention basin designs.
Provide a Storm Water Drainage Report. This report, to be prepared for each project
will be based on the format and technical standards of the City of Flagstaff Engineer’s
Design Report.
Wherever possible, site development should occur such that all flows exiting the
project site remain in the current watershed sub-basin so as to not impact drainage
patterns in adjacent watershed sub-basins.
Flood Prevention: Proposed building ground floor elevations and any apertures into
the building should be 1’ or more above the 100 year flood plain. Sunken access ways
or patios leading to building levels below the natural grade of the site are not
permitted when adjacent to a 100 year floodplain, and discouraged in other areas.
Soil should be graded so that water drains away from the building at a minimum of
2%, subject to other site criteria, such as accessibility. Elevations of underground
utilities shall be considered in the grading layout.
Design and construction activity must be in compliance with the current Northern
Arizona University Master Plan Update, located at https://www4.nau.edu/cas/Plan-
Dev/2010%20Campus%20Master%20Plan.html
Pounding of a duration that may allow mosquito breeding, in access ways which may
create a nuisance for pedestrians, or within 10’ of building foundations (to prevent
infiltration that may cause indoor mold or structural problems).
Any water catchment not draining within 24 hours
Retention (groundwater infiltration) facilities not draining within 12 hours.
Surface water that is wasted, e.g., by running down the street.
Surface water that is routed in a way which inappropriately distributes sediment or
chemicals.
Channelized or concentrated water conveyed over sidewalks
Water running off of irrigated turf areas.
Water that puddles in areas where freezing may cause a pedestrian or vehicular
hazard or damage to hardscape.
ROOF DRAINAGE
Roof drainage outlets and landscape surface materials must be designed to prevent
landscape erosion.
Pounding within 10’ of the building edge is prohibited.
Roof leaders/scuppers should be of a small enough diameter so as to divide roof
runoff into a series of outlets with a low enough volume/velocity that will allow water
to be harvested equally throughout the site (i.e., broken into small volumes for
smaller basins/swales). Large diameter outlet pipes convey too much water at too
high velocity to capture in small-scale landscape swales. Proper clean outs should be
provided to allow necessary maintenance of smaller diameter pipes.
Roof Drain pipes are prone to freezing during the winter.
Roof drainages should flow freely even under freezing conditions, new construction
shall include interior or insulated and heated roof drains with temp sensor switches to
prevent warm weather operation. Renovations of roofing where roof drains are a
problem will include correction of the problem through similar design solutions.
Depending on the project site, the Design professional should review with NAU
Manager of Utilities the strategies to drain the roof (day-lighting versus tie-in to storm
water drainage underground).
SOILS
Site soils need special consideration during the design process for effective use of LID
technologies.
PLANNING
Soils evaluation should begin with planning for site areas where soils are to be used
for structural and vegetative support and for water collection and infiltration. Areas
considered for infiltration should be evaluated for soil characteristics especially
percolation rates, prior to designating these areas for natural infiltration. If soils are
suitable, these areas need special planning and protection because construction
activities will change the nature of the soils and potentially destroy their useful
characteristics.
Site planning for soil protection should be treated with the same level of attention as
protection of existing vegetation and provision of structurally appropriate soils for
building support. Soils that are to be used in the final LID structures or in landscaping
must be protected from contamination and compaction by construction equipment.
Evaluation of the trade-offs between removal and replacement of soils, gravels and
non-structural earth and protection of this resource onsite shall be part of the design.
Cost effectiveness of different solutions should be evaluated and presented as part of
the design effort.
TESTING
If possible, soils testing should be conducted at the time of or prior to preparation of
the initial draft of the Storm Water Drainage Report that will be prepared for a
project. Such reports should investigate not only structural characteristics but also
percolation rates.
A soil percolation test is required after rough grading of major/regulatory detention
and retention facilities to verify that site development activities have not negatively
impacted percolation rates. If reduction in percolation rate is identified, mitigation
may be required.
SUBSURFACE PREPARATION
Structural soils should be explored for use under large expanses of hardscape or other
areas with limited percolation.
Soils beneath/adjacent to French drains, and other sub-surface structures should be
over-excavated and replaced with an engineered soil designed to absorb or accept
water.
COMPACTION
Soil beneath the bottoms of all water harvesting areas should be loosened to a depth
of at least 18” prior to trenching and installation of irrigation lines.
Specified compaction required for buildings, streets, and other structures shall be
maintained within specified distances around such structures. Beyond these
compaction zones, soil should be loosened to a depth of at least 1’ prior to planting
within all landscaped areas.
All construction debris and waste material must be removed from the soil within
landscape and basin areas.
Once compaction is achieved and completed, soils should not be disturbed as to not
affect soil compaction.
Acceptable limits of compaction must be maintained through completion.
SOIL GRADING
The finished grade of all landscaped areas that are designed for use as catchments
should be recessed downward from adjacent paved surfaces. Maximum reveal at edge
of pedestrian circulation paving shall be 1/2" to minimize the risk of injury. Shoulders
are to be consistent with the landscaping portion of Division 32 00 00 Northern
Arizona University Technical Standards.
soil bed that will rapidly absorb retained rainfall. Extensive subsurface soil
preparation will be required for turf in basins which collect greater volumes.
RIP-RAP
Where required, utilize rough, non-angular, owner approved stone (samples should be
provided by Contractor for size verification by Design Professional/ Civil Engineer).
Filter fabric should be included under riprap used for erosion protection in a
conveyance channel, and any gaps in riprap shall be fully filled with pea gravel or
sized/graded rock that is swept in the gaps to prevent erosion.
Rip-rap to be sized per City of Flagstaff Storm Water Management Manual and Civil
Engineer shall included calculation in report.
SNOW MANAGEMENT
In all designs and site planning, snow management must be considered and provided as
follows:
Parking areas need to allow for efficient snow removal operations and include
appropriate turning radii for snow plows and heavy equipment.
Snow storage areas adequate for a typical winter storm (2 feet of snow in 24 hours)
shall be included in parking lot design.
Snow melt drainage from the storage areas and for areas around the building will be
designed with special consideration for access to snow melt drainage conveyances for
maintenance activities as needed.
Evaluation and design of areas that are prone to collect snow or ice with special
attention to the areas on the north side of buildings and structures where refreezing
of melted snow or ice causes hazardous conditions to pedestrian and maintenance
vehicle traffic.
Evaluation of snow melt and melt storage shall include coordination with Capital
Assets and Services Grounds Department to determine if deicing materials or
chemicals are being used on snow and ice and if runoff will need special handling to
prevent damage to landscaping through use of the water or clogging of infiltration
systems by cinder fines or other materials.
The project design should be informed by project-specific site development guidelines, The
Northern Arizona University Design Guidelines and Technical Standards, site soils tests, and
other regulatory considerations. For projects located in South Campus, review the NAU
Assessment of South Campus Storm Drainage. These resources shall guide the preparation of a
Storm Water Drainage Report and design solutions, as required in the project scope of work
and described below.
The Northern Arizona University Manager of Utilities is available to the Design Professional
throughout the project to review these standards and guidelines and to discuss and provide
guidance on detailed storm water drainage design solutions.
The Design Professional is responsible for insuring that all applicable sub-consultants
understand the studies, plan sets, details, and specifications each sub-consultant will need to
prepare in order to meet these standards. Sub-consultant fees should appropriately reflect the
work necessary to meet these standards.
During the first design stage where site development concepts are being investigated there
should be a demonstration of how existing drainage impacts the site along with conceptual
options for how storm water drainage may become an integral part of the project design. At
each subsequent plan review phase the submittal set shall include designed storm water
drainage elements which are responsive to the Concepts and Mitigation section of the Storm
Water Drainage Report described below and are developed to a level of design commensurate
with the rest of the project.
Appropriate soils tests will be completed as early in the design process as possible to inform the
final storm water drainage design solutions. These tests shall include measures needed to
understand the suitability of the soil for the infiltration needed for retention/detention, in
addition to structural and other characteristics as described in Sections above.
Existing Conditions Analysis: this report section analyzes and documents existing storm water
drainage conditions on the project site. The form and methods used for this report should
conform in general to City of Flagstaff standards, e.g., use the format of the City of Flagstaff
Concepts and Mitigation: each subsequent draft of this report section should include increasing
specificity and technical documentation on proposed storm water drainage features and
mitigation which emerge from the initial vision/concepts. This report section shall include, at a
minimum, the following two elements:
Storm water drainage vision and concepts for the project, presented in narrative and
graphic form, conveying how storm water drainage may be incorporated in the project
design. Include specifics concepts such as existing drainage patterns and proposed
pathways, infiltration, detention, and storage. Evaluation of required, recommended,
and anticipated storm water drainage features shall be included, along with topics
such as defining finished floor elevations relative to flood levels and evaluating other
storm water drainage sources in the vicinity for potential use within the project site.
The final Report shall include a water budget for the proposed landscape, including an
analysis of water sources available to meet the budget. Proposed concepts and
features shall come from a collaborative process involving all applicable team
members. At a minimum this should include the project’s Landscape Architect, Civil
Engineer, and the Project Architect.
First Draft: The first draft of the Storm Water Drainage Report shall be included with
the projects programming design submittal. The storm water drainage conditions,
concepts, features, and mitigation described within the report are to be included in
the presentation. All subsequent project presentations and submittal sets shall include
these storm water drainage elements developed to a level of design commensurate
with the rest of the project.
Second Draft: A second draft of the Storm Water Drainage Report shall be due with
the schematic and design document phase submittal set. This draft shall include
Final Report: The final version of the Storm Water Drainage Report shall be submitted
with the construction document submittal and will include updated modeling and
analysis of designed features and mitigation. It shall be sealed by a registered Civil
Engineer and shall include calculations, model outputs, assumptions made, and any
other relevant information to provide a comprehensive report. An executive summary
is to be provided which includes, among other information, a statement from the
project Civil Engineer noting in both technical and layman’s terms ways in which the
project design varies from and/or meets NAU Standards.
REFERENCES:
1
NAU Design Guidelines and Technical Standards (latest revision).
2
The City of Flagstaff Low Impact Development: Guidance Manual for Site Design and
Implementation (latest revision).
http://flagstaff.az.gov/index.aspx?NID=1464
3
City of Flagstaff Stormwater Management Design Manual (latest revision).
http://www.flagstaffstormwater.com
6. CAMPUS SUSTAINABILITY
The NAU Campus Sustainability Design Guidelines have been created to assist in advancing
sustainable design on all Northern Arizona University campuses. The guidelines are intended
to be applied to new construction and major renovation projects. Design Professionals,
Contractors, and third party Developers of NAU projects shall be required to incorporate the
guidelines into their projects. The goal is to meet as many of the guideline objectives as
possible. Deviations shall be identified by the project team for review and discussion with
the University (NAU PM). Where applicable, a Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) analysis may be
required, to include environmental, economic and social costs and benefits. Project teams
are encouraged to submit a TCO analysis with their initial review package for any proposed
design elements with an initial first cost greater than a conventional solution.
The ability to achieve NAU’s sustainability goals as delineated in the guidelines shall be a
significant factor in the selection of Design Professionals, Contractors and Developers for ASU
work.
Design Professional teams are expected to incorporate the development sustainable systems
within the context of construction and renovation to meet the goals of the University.
This is a suggested process for meeting the goals and requirements.
Establish project-specific benchmarks:
Discuss, record, and document the specific goals for the project during programming
and during all phases of design. Most projects will adhere to the benchmarks
provided herein but in some cases projects may have more stringent requirements or
focus on a certain area. Include the benchmarks selected in the Programming
documentation.
Model the building energy and site systems:
During programming and schematic design, the project team will develop a baseline
energy model to identify key areas for focus during alternative evaluation. The
baseline energy model will be used for alternative evaluation.
Develop and compare alternatives:
During Design Development, the project team will test alternative systems using Life
Cycle Cost Analysis . Proposed alternatives will be presented; recommended
alternatives discussed and selected alternatives documented in an energy model
report included in the design development documents.
Sustainable Construction:
Construction will be monitored and documented per the LEED certification process to
assure that the methods used during the construction and all project changes are
consistent with sustainability goals and requirements of the construction documents.
General: sustainable design precepts appropriate for the Northern Arizona mountain
environment should be incorporated – water conservation, building orientation, sun
exposure, and snow and ice accumulation are issues of special concern in mountain
environments.
Appropriate passive solar design techniques should be incorporated and where the
project scope and budget support it, solar water heating and photovoltaic systems
should be considered if determined to be economically viable.
Appropriate landscape design, water harvesting techniques and use of the
University’s reclaimed water system should be incorporated (only where
available).
Appropriate day lighting design should be considered to minimize the
requirements for artificial lighting and to promote the interior/exterior connection
of the building.
Innovation and Creativity in achieving the sustainable design goals are encouraged.
Additionally, design aesthetics shall be considering in all aspects of the building design,
including sustainable design components. The State of Arizona mandate for all state
facilities to achieve LEED Silver certification is the minimum standard for NAU. NAU’s goal
is to excel in sustainable design in as many ways as possible.
General Project Planning & Design: The design shall manifest NAU’s commitment to
sustainability to the greatest extent possible. Sustainability shall be addressed
comprehensively as an integral aspect of the design philosophy and in all aspects of the
building design.
Building Size & Footprint: Minimize the overall building size (square footage and
footprint) while meeting the building program requirements. The goal is efficient use of
space to reduce overall resource consumption; including embodied energy, operational
energy, and building materials.
Design for Future Use: Plan for a “100-year Building” through flexibility of use and future
reuse; no “throw away” buildings. Design interior spaces that are flexible and allow for
changes in use. Use standard furniture wherever possible. Minimize use of custom
millwork, custom building systems (door frames, doors, interior windows etc.) to
maximize reuse in the future. For retrofits, analyze current space requirements for space
efficiency, function, and use proximity.
Programming & Space Planning: Group spaces or activities with similar energy
requirements and times of use to allow for zoning efficiency of passive and mechanical
energy systems. The goal is to reduce demand and optimize operational efficiency.
Service Areas: Service areas shall support efficient operations, program, and building
management for NAU sustainability initiatives; such as recycling collection, trash
compaction, water capture, service vehicle access, etc.
Existing Landscaping: Protect significant natural and historic landscaping and incorporate
those elements into the new landscape design.
New Landscaping/Site Planning: Program the site to create a “sense of place” through the
design of a variety of experiences and activities with micro-climates appropriate to desert
climate conditions. Maximize opportunities to create landscape shading and cooling for
the building, exterior spaces, and walkways while also specifying low maintenance and
desert-appropriate plant materials.
Building Envelope: Design the building envelope to minimize heat loss and gain. Exceed
the current ASHRAE (American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning
Engineers) building envelope performance baseline standard by 30% or more. Avoid
thermal bridging by providing thermal breaks in the exterior building envelope.
Window Glazing: Select glazing size and materials appropriate for the orientation of the
windows. Use double or triple glazing wherever possible. Thermal breaks shall be
included in window frames at all exterior glazing.
Window Shading: Every exterior window shall be shaded appropriately for the window
orientation. Consider cleaning and maintenance of windows and shading devices in the
design. Provide a shading analysis for review. Insure that operable interior shading is
accessible to the building occupants.
analysis. Provide permanent energy metering on all buildings for monitoring each type of
energy use, utilizing the NAU Campus monitoring standards for water, lighting, other
electrical, gas, etc. Provide the capability to monitor and analyze post-occupancy
performance in comparison to energy analysis predictions. Provide a 1-year and 2-year
post occupancy energy/carbon use analysis. Use Smart Meters for all spaces or groups of
spaces as appropriate to monitor energy use and educate users on their affect on energy
consumption.
Climate-Responsive Materials: Specify materials that are durable under desert climate
conditions (UV radiation exposure and extreme heat).
Reused & Repurposed Materials: Present opportunities for installation of reused and
repurposed materials, including the building shell, structural materials, finishes, fixtures,
etc. Utilize Green Globes3 reference guidelines for baseline standard.
New construction must adhere to the American Society of Heating, Refrigeration, and Air-
conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) ASHRAE 189.1 and provide the minimum requirements
for site planning, design, construction, and operational planning for green commercial and
institutional buildings.
Design elements include site sustainability, water use and management, energy use,
indoor environmental quality, plus the building’s impact on the atmosphere, materials
and resources. Under energy: mechanical equipment performance, insulation, controlling
air leakage, day-lighting, solar gain, occupancy-controlled lighting and ventilation, as well
as on site renewable energy are included.
The designs presented and approved must meet or exceed the ASHRAE 189.1
requirements and incorporate the LEED requirements as listed below.
Following these Design Guidelines and ASHRAE 189.1 Standard, should lead to achieving
LEED Silver Certification. The DP should do their best to design a building that will be as
sustainable as possible when taking into account life cycle cost analysis, total cost of
ownership, and energy consumption. The University is relying on its DP to do what is right
for the environment and what will benefit the overall University Maintenance and Energy
budgets. As decisions are being made, the University requires to be involved (through its
Project Managers) in all material selections and the DP might be requested to provide
justification of their selections (carbon impact, maintenance and energy costs)
The University has established a goal, wherever appropriate, to acquire LEED Silver
Certification as established by the United States Green Building Council on all projects as
defined below:
New Buildings - A minimum of LEED Silver Certification for all new construction.
Building Expansions - Major building expansions should achieve LEED Silver
Certification for the expansion, and if the project scope and budget support it, for the
entire building. This goal will be established during project programming phase.
Renovations - Renovation projects are defined as those projects involving the
alteration of a portion of an existing building. Renovations range from simple
aesthetic improvements to complex physical reconfigurations and systems’
replacement. Due to the potential range of existing conditions – and the ability of a
renovation project to address such conditions – it is incumbent that each renovation
project undergoes an evaluation early in the budgeting and programming phases to
determine if LEED certification can be achieved.
All projects will adhere to the most recent version of USGBC LEED standards as of date of
DP contract. Projects will use the most recent LEED project management software to
register, document and certify projects.
In general, for minor renovations or room specific renovations, requirements for LEED
Certification will not be part of the project scope. For projects where major renovation is
part of the scope, inclusion of LEED Silver Certification should be anticipated. For example,
in major renovation projects that affect entire floors or buildings, LEED Silver Certification
should be anticipated.
When considering which points will be required to obtain University LEED objectives, the
Design Professional should be aware of the potential design impacts carried across the
major design disciplines. At the time of this revision for these guidelines, the following list
was compiled of potential design issues that may carry over to the Mechanical, Electrical,
and Plumbing disciplines and is based on the potential LEED credit categories defined in
LEED-V2009 version. While these issues may not apply to all projects and there are
obviously more coordination and design issues involved with a LEED design, the following
list is provided to spur awareness of design elements and coordination effort that may be
required. In addition, the following list is not intended to limit the Design Professional’s
responsibility or creativity in providing a successful and functional LEED design.
The University has identified the following LEED points (LEED silver certified) for
mandatory inclusion:
NEW CONSTRUCTION
SITE DEVELOPMENT
Prerequisite SSp1 - Construction Activity Pollution Prevention
Prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan regardless the size of the site (under
or over 1 acre), to ensure that construction debris and earthwork will not be infiltrate
the Campus existing storm water drainage system.
WATER EFFICIENCY
Prerequisite WEp1 - Water Use Reduction
Use a modified waterless urinal (water urinal with removable handle to allow
occasional cleaning flush by Custodial crews only), low flow toilet, low-flow showers as
applicable, non-potable water use for toilets
Credit WEc1 - Water Efficient Landscaping: No potable water use for irrigation
Coordinate with Landscape Architect to verify water quantities (impact to water
service). Consider impact to storm water collection system.
Select materials that are readily serviceable from the USA (parts available locally)
Select materials that are manufactured as close as possible and avoid materials
coming from oversea with long procurement lead-time. Take into account not only
where the finished materials are manufactured but also where the raw materials are
coming from. Think globally about the total carbon footprint of the selected materials.
If the proposed HVAC system is not the NAU preferred HVAC system described in
Specification Section 23 00 00 (variable air volume, single duct, with terminal reheat), an
additional alternative to the LEED baseline HVAC system will be modeled. The additional
alternative to the baseline system will be the single duct variable air volume system. The
University requires the energy savings data between the LEED baseline HVAC system, the
University preferred HVAC system and the proposed HVAC system. The model inputs and
reports will be submitted at the design development stage.
The requirements of ASHRAE 189.1 shall be implemented during Design Documents and
Construction Documents phases and shall be incorporated in the final construction
documents. Modeling based on ASHRAE 189.1 is not required.
The energy model should capture the role of components in the system performance. A
life cycle analysis of components that are part of an energy system without an appropriate
model included will be deemed incomplete and inconclusive. A complete energy model
will be included as part of the 100% design development documentation for each project.
6.4 BUILDING LIFE CYCLE COST (BLCC) ANALYSIS AND BUILDING COMPONENT SELECTION
5. Structural Systems
6. Mechanical Systems
7. Water Systems
8. Interior Materials
Goals shall be established for each of the systems as listed. Each project requires that at
least six life cycle comparative studies be presented and updated for each design phase.
Specific required studies include: roofing alternatives within the building envelope
category, HVAC system alternatives within energy systems, and flooring as part of interior
materials. No more than three studies shall be completed within the same category.
Resources
The following resources were identified as potential methods for BLCC Analysis:
- The US Department of Energy provides a life cycle cost analysis program through
The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and provides a program
to assist in BLCC Analyses.
- BLCC conducts economic analyses by evaluating the relative cost effectiveness of
alternative buildings and building-related systems or components. Typically, BLCC
is used to evaluate alternative designs that have higher initial costs but lower
operating costs over the project life than the lowest-initial-cost design. It is
especially useful for evaluating the costs and benefits of energy and water
conservation and renewable energy projects. The life-cycle cost (LCC) of two or
more alternative designs are computed and compared to determine which has the
lowest LCC and is therefore more economical in the long run. BLCC also calculates
comparative economic measures for alternative designs, including net savings,
savings-to-investment ratio, adjusted internal rate of return, and years to payback.
- The software can be used to evaluate projects for both new and existing buildings.
While BLCC is oriented toward construction-related decisions, it can be used to
evaluate alternative designs for almost any project type in which higher capital
investment costs lead to lower future operating-related costs (NIST website,
2009).
Designers are expected to be well versed in modeling and to have the ability to
demonstrate the accuracy of the proposed model using existing facilities and locally and
regionally appropriate data.
Building “Owner’s Manual”: Provide a Building Owner’s Manual (in digital format) on
how to operate and maintain the building and site to optimize the building systems
and design.
Resource Usage Information Display: Buildings are not static in nature and therefore
it is important to provide feedback to the users on their effect on energy, water and
other resource consumption as they use the buildings. Provide smart meters to
educate and influence user behavior with the goal of reducing energy consumption.
7. CAMPUS METERING
Utility metering is required for all new construction and renovation projects that include
energy or water consuming components. Utility meters shall be designed and specified by the
Design Professional. Contractor shall furnish and install all utility meters. Utility meter
commissioning shall be a joint effort between the Contractor, Design Professional,
Commissioning Agent, (where applicable) and the University. The University will not accept
any utility meter until it has been shown to be fully functioning and operational. Refer to
section 23 05 19 for Mechanical Meter Standard and 26 09 13 for Electrical Power meters.
South Campus:
Heating water flow in GPM, totalized energy in BTU's
North Campus:
Steam flow in lbs./hr., totalized energy lbs
Both Campuses
Chilled water flow in GPM, totalized in BTU's
Domestic water totalized in gallons
Reclaimed water in gallons
Natural Gas in SCF
Electric use totalized in kW hrs., real time demand in kW
Utility meters shall communicate with the University’s campus EMS system. Specify all
necessary components and communication protocols to assure meter information can be
mapped to campus Building EMS Web Page.
Universal design “is not a design style, but an orientation to any design process that begins
with a responsibility to the experience of the user” (Institute for Human Centered Design,
2010). It is a proactive approach to design considerations in the physical environment, as well
as the information, policy, and learning environments. Considering the experience of the user
prior to making design decisions can create long-term efficiencies for the institution by
minimizing the need for future adaptations and retrofitting. In recognition of this potential,
Northern Arizona University has established its commitment to universal design within its
2010 Strategic Plan under goal 5, which states “Foster and support universally-designed
environments,” and goal 7, which states, “Design products and environments to be usable by
all people, to the greatest extent possible.”
The Center for Universal Design at North Carolina State University has defined universal
design as “the design of products and environments to be usable by all people, to the greatest
extent possible, without the need for adaptation or specialized design” (Center for Universal
Design, 1997). In supporting this definition, it has identified seven primary principles of
universal design for products and environments.
(see http://www.ncsu.edu/www/ncsu/design/sod5/cud/about_ud/udprinciples.htm)
These principles are:
These principles are described in detail at the Center for universal Design website listed
above. This information, and other reference material, can also be found on Northern Arizona
University’s Commission on Disability Access and Design website at home.nau.edu/cdad.
Projects involving building/sites on the National Register of Historic Places must comply with
the UD Accessibility Standards in such a way that impact is minimized and a building/site’s
historic integrity and character defining features are maintained. The determination of
Due to potential range of existing conditions – and the ability of renovation (or historic
renovation) project to address such conditions – it is imperative that each project involving an
existing building undergo evaluation early in the design process to outline the scope of
accessibility compliance which can be achieved.
All construction projects – new, renovation and historic renovation – must comply with the
ANSI 117.1 accessibility requirements (as a referenced standard in the IBC). In addition, must
comply with the 2010 ADA Standards, as adopted by the Department of Justice (DOJ) in
September 2010 and their related standards as they apply. Compliance shall also conform to
the requirements of the latest editions of all state regulations and the various codes which
have been adopted by the University at the time of bid.
New construction projects must comply with mandatory standards throughout both the
building and site. Additions to existing buildings must comply with mandatory standards
throughout the building and – if provided with new building entrances from the exterior – the
site. Renovation projects must comply with mandatory standards within the physical
boundaries of the renovation.
In regards to achieving accessibility as part of renovations, the University recognizes that
there are some challenges renovation projects cannot overcome, such as:
Conditions physically beyond the limits of the renovation
Spatial/structural/technical conditions which make accessibility infeasible to achieve,
and/or
Conditions which cannot be addressed within a defined project scope or budget.
Many of the UD Accessibility Standards become preferences – rather than mandatory – when
there are significant constraints to achieving accessibility. However, the University expects
Design Professionals to bring an innovative and resourceful approach to renovation projects
on campus, and strive to achieve compliance with the UD Accessibility Standards.
Reach Ranges
The operable portion of building equipment and controls (such as electrical switches,
fire alarm pull stations, above-work-surface telephone and data outlets, thermostats,
elevator call buttons, etc.) shall be located no higher than 44 inches above the finished
floor.
Proximity door access card devices shall be used in areas where required for security.
They will be centered no higher than 38 inches above the finished floor.
Control plates for automatic door openers shall be centered 36 inches above the
finished floor.
During Construction
Renovations that temporarily eliminate building-wide accessibility accommodations
(i.e. change of building entrance, access through building, accessible restrooms,
elevators, etc.) shall provide comparable, temporary replacements-including
temporary directional signage-for said accommodations.
Construction fencing/staging, earthwork, temporary drainage conditions shall be
designed to maintain existing accessible routes or alternative, temporary accessible
routes-including temporary directional signage-shall be provided.
Temporary ramps used during construction must comply with ADAAG regulations.
Surface Materials
Decorative ground surface treatments (i.e. exposed aggregate concrete, unit pavers,
stone paving, etc.) shall not be on an accessible route.
Granular surface materials used to create exterior paths of travel shall provide a stable
surface that is usable during all weather conditions.
Changes in surface material-both inside and outside-shall be provided with a durable
transition/threshold that will meet the change in elevation height requirement
throughout the life of the building/space.
Granular surface materials may not be used on path of travel surfaces with a slope
greater that 1:20.
The University’s standard for detectable warning surface is truncated domes pavers.
Building Entrances
The main entrance of a building shall be universally accessible via a single route.
All building entrances shall be accessible-including employee entrances or entrances
other than the main entrance.
Ramps
Where changes in elevation are encountered (including courtyards and open spaces)
full consideration shall be given to university accessible design that addresses
elevation change.
Where grades/space allow, sloped sidewalks (slope 1:20 or flatter) shall be used to
overcome changes in elevation.
Ramps (defined as anything steeper than 1:20 slope) shall have a maximum of 1:16
slope.
Curb Ramps (curb cuts)
Curb ramp slopes shall be 1:12.
Concrete aprons shall be provided at the bottom of the curb ramps.
Curb ramps within sidewalks (parallel to the path of travel) shall be provided with a
1:16 slope.
The University’s standard for detectable warning surfaces is truncated domes in a
contrasting color.
The depth of detectable warning surface in the direction of travel shall not exceed 24
inches.
Parking Spaces
Universal Parking space should be 132 inches wide with a 60 inch access aisle.
If there is no passenger loading in front of a building, an accessible loading zone space
shall be provided by locating loading space(s) adjacent to universal parking spaces,
thus sharing the access aisle. These accessible loading zones should be provided with
appropriate signage.
Note that when a van accessible space is a 132" (11feet) wide, then the loading zone
shall be 60" (5 feet) wide or when a van accessible space is 96" (8 feet) wide, then the
loading zone shall be 96" (8 feet) wide.
General
No vestibule (i.e. doors in series) entries into restrooms.
Gender neutral restrooms shall be accessible for the purposes of privacy and/or
assisted use.
Mirrors shall be full length or no more than 40 inches from floor to bottom of mirror.
Shower Compartments
In non-residential conditions, accessible showers shall be:
o At least 60” X 36” with 60” X 60” being ideal
o Transfer type entry
o Provided with padded, fold down bench with integral support legs that extend
the full width of the stall and located on the wall opposite of the
controls/shower head
o In communal showers, all the showering areas will be accessible to include
hand-held showers, grab bars and fold out shower benches.
Signage
All permanent rooms and spaces shall be identified with visual and tactile signs
mounted 60 inches above the floor on the latch side of the door.
Office Spaces
Each individual office space in new facilities shall have sufficient clear floor space to
accommodate a 5 foot turning radius.
Academic Laboratories
Academic (teaching) laboratories shall be accessible. The accessible work stations
shall provide, or have the capacity to provide, those elements of laboratory
furnishings and equipment specific to the type of teaching expected to be conducted
in the laboratory in question.
Provide at least one wheelchair accessible workstation in each lab. The workstation
shall include:
o A bench space which is 7 feet long, adjustable in height.
o A sink with faucet controls located on the side with single action lever controls
or wrist blade handles.
o Lab gases and power outlets located on the side of the bench or within 18
inches of the front edge of the bench with single action lever controls or wrist
blade handles.
o Storage facilities (for lab equipment/materials to be utilized by students in the
lab) within ADA reach ranges.
Where academic laboratories utilize fume hoods, provide at least one accessible fume
hood with:
o An adjustable height work surface.
o Gas/services within the hood located on the side of the hood or within 18
inches of the front edge of the hood, with single action lever controls or wrist
blade handles.
Eyewashes/safety showers shall be independently accessible and operable by a
wheelchair user.
Aisles 42-48 inches wide are required for accessible benches and fume hoods.
Where non-laboratory teaching amenities (writing surfaces, lecture areas, etc.) are
provided within academic laboratories, at least one accessible workstation which
includes such amenities shall be provided.
Specific purpose teaching facilities (balance or tissue culture rooms, etc.) shall provide
a wheelchair accessible space with:
o A 5 foot diameter radius within one room.
o An adjustable bench space.
Research Laboratories
Research laboratories shall have provisions for wheelchair accessibility. The accessible
workstation(s) shall provide, or have the capacity to provide, those elements of
laboratory furnishings and equipment specific to the type of teaching expected to be
conducted in the laboratory in question.
Individual research laboratory rooms assigned to specific employees are considered
employee work areas. For employee work areas, basic access is required for
approach, entry, and exit.
Research laboratory rooms with open assignment workstations/bench space shall be
provided with at least one accessible workstation with:
o A bench space 7 feet long, adjustable in height .
o A sink with faucet controls located on the side (not rear) with single action
lever controls or wrist blade handles.
o Lab gases and power outlets located on the side of the bench or within 18
inches of the front edge of the bench with single action lever controls or wrist
blade handles.
o Aisles 42-48 inches wide for accessible bench space/hoods.
o Storage facilities within ADA reach ranges.
General
When unfixed furniture may be moved into the path of travel, 42-48 inches aisles for
clearance/maneuvering shall be provided.
General
Residence Halls shall provide all residents and visitors access to all publically accessible
areas of the facility.
Entrances
All accessible building entrances to residence halls shall be provided with the
infrastructure to permit unlocking the doors with a proximity card and permit opening
with an automatic door operator.
Paths of Travel
Stairs and elevators shall be located on a common route within the building.
Interior doors along the path of travel to accessible rooms and those to building-wide
amenities/services (i.e. kitchen, laundry, study/common rooms, etc.) shall be prodied
with automatic door operators.
The location of accessible rooms 1 in residence halls shall be:
o On a convenient path of travel from the main entrance and elevator.
o Close to building-wide amenities/services.
Doors
Accessible rooms on all floors of a residence hall shall be provided with the
infrastructure for automatic door operators.
If “peep holes” are provided to residence rooms, provide an additional “peep hole” at
48 inches above the finished floor in the doors of accessible rooms.
Infrastructure of door knock signalers (i.e. strobes) shall be provided for the entry
doors to accessible rooms and the doors to bathrooms attached to accessible rooms.
Bathrooms
Shower compartments in residential condition accessible bathrooms shall be:
o Roll in showers
o Specifically a 60” X 60” dimension
o Provided with a padded, fold down bench with integral support legs installed
on the wall adjacent to the controls/shower head.
Accessible lavatories in residential condition accessible bathrooms shall be provided
with counter top space (to accommodate personal care items).
It is the intent and purpose that all construction projects conform to the requirement
standards for persons with disabilities as set forth in the 2010 ADA Standards, as adopted by
the Department of Justice (DOJ) in September 2010 and their related standards as they apply.
Compliance shall conform to the requirements of the latest editions of all state regulations
and the various codes which have been adopted by the University at the time of bid.
The University is committed to designating and maintaining a minimum of one gender neutral
accessible restroom (GNA) in as many of its buildings as reasonably feasible. Therefore the
following criteria should be followed:
WHERE REQUIRED
New Buildings - A minimum of one gender neutral (GNA) restroom should be provided
in each new building.
Building Expansions - Major building expansions should include a GNA restroom unless
it is determined that the existing facility has a restroom that can be designated or
converted as part of the project scope.
Renovations - Renovation projects are defined as those projects involving the
alteration of a portion of an existing building. Renovations range from simple
aesthetic improvements to complex physical reconfigurations and systems
replacement. Due to the potential range of existing conditions – and the ability of a
renovation project to address such conditions – it is incumbent that each renovation
project undergoes an evaluation early in the design process to outline the scope of
compliance which can be achieved.
In general, addition of GNA restrooms should be considered for all projects including minor
renovations. For projects where major bathroom renovations are part of the scope, addition
of one GNA restroom, should be included. For major renovation projects affecting entire
floors or buildings GNA restrooms should be provided if reasonably feasible.
Residential Facilities - Because of the variety of facilities that Residence Life deals with,
the Design Professional shall discuss with the User specific project requirements and
criteria.
DESIGN CRITERIA
A GNA restroom consists of a single room with its own door.
Accessible GN restroom(s) shall not be used as a substitute for providing accessibility
to multi-stall rest rooms.
In new construction, each GNA restroom shall include one diaper changing table in
addition to standard restroom fixtures/equipment.
Refer to other sections of this DSS as applicable for plumbing and bathroom accessory
criteria.
The plumbing fixtures in GNA restrooms shall count towards the total fixture counts
required by code.
All GNA restrooms will be designated as RESTROOM with the universal male symbol,
universal female symbol and universal handicap accessible symbol (if applicable).
Custodial Services are inherent to the operations of buildings and proper service areas must
be considered with all other areas during the programming and planning stages of each
building.
Universally accepted standards have yet to be set for custodial closets and storerooms.
Certain criteria however, for size, shape, location, and special appurtenances, have been
developed which are compatible with present cleaning procedures and today’s cleaning
equipment.
Comprehensive custodian operations encompass four major areas:
Custodial Closets
Custodian Storage Areas
Recycling and Solid Waste Disposal Systems
Vertical transportation of Custodial equipment
CUSTODIAN CLOSETS
The custodial closets should be planned to function primarily as the workrooms of men and
women responsible for cleaning the interior surfaces of the building.
CO-LOCATION OF UTILITES NOT ALLOWED: Telephone switching gear, elevator controls,
electric panels water heaters, pipe chases or other service functions are not compatible with
custodian operations, and should not be located inside custodian closets. Openings to pipe
chases or mechanical equipment areas should also not be located inside custodian closets.
Northern Arizona University has developed the following criteria for custodian closets:
Size should be a minimum of 92 square feet, with an eight foot minimum width.
Recessed light fixtures (to allow for clearance of long broom and mop handles)
providing 75 foot candles of light.
Adequate ventilation.
Pegs for storage of rotary brushes.
Hangers for wet mops over the sink.
Hangers and wall space for dust mops and brooms.
Hard surface walls impervious to water. Floors of sealed concrete or epoxy flooring.
Shelves in closet to accommodate supplies in case lots, and to allow for storage of
liquids in original 5 or 6 gallon containers. Additional shelving (minimum 11 inches
deep) shall be mounted at five feet high to accommodate light containers and
provide clearance for machines storage.
A 36 inches wide door that swings out, not into the room.
Reinforced hot and cold water outlets shall be provided with institutional grade
hardware and shall be mounted not less than 24 inches above a floor type basin.
Basin curb should be 8 inches minimum above the floor.
A minimum of 5feet x 2 feet open area to allow for the vacuum unit storage.
A grounded 20 Amp. Duplex outlet in open wall space, not behind shelves, for
recharging battery operated equipment. A minimum of three GFI duplex electrical
outlets shall be provided.
Floor drains for the closet, all floors sloped to drain at a minimum ¼ inch per foot to
the drain.
Location of custodian closets is very important. They should be centrally located with
multiple closets as needed so that no area in a building is more than 150 feet in walking
distance from a “wet” closet. Each closet should not serve in excess of 15,000 square feet.
Buildings should have custodian closets on every floor. Good locations for secondary
custodian closets are:
Close to elevators
Close to main pedestrian areas
Between two restrooms
VERTICAL TRANSPORTATION
There should be an elevator in every multi-storied building.
The elevator should land on every floor including the basement.
The elevator should be available to custodian and maintenance personnel.
The design of areas adjacent to the source of recyclable waste generation shall include
additional space for collection of recyclable materials as follows:
Copy Rooms: Paper from copy rooms: 24 inches deep x 22 inches wide minimum
Common Areas: Newspaper collection bins: 24 inches deep x 22 inches wide
minimum
Vending Areas: Aluminum collection bins: 22 inches deep x 12 inches wide
minimum
Restrooms, break rooms, lounges, and vending areas: Wet waste collection bins: 24
inches deep x 22 inches wide minimum
SUMMARY
Proper custodian closets carefully planned and sized storage rooms or custodial supplies, and
consideration of solid waste and recyclables collection and disposal requirements are prime
ingredients in any efficient housekeeping program.
REFER TO “Northern Arizona University Guidelines for Planning and Designing Learning
Spaces”, Report to the Provost, From the Provost’s Academic Computing Advisory Committee,
dated June 2008.
The full report is posted on the Capital Assets and Services website at the following link:
(PENDING)
Pending Issuance
Pending Issuance