0% found this document useful (0 votes)
23 views

Imperial Assignment 11 PDC

1. The document discusses empirical model identification for process control systems through statistical and process reaction curve methods. 2. Key factors in empirical model identification are experimental design, operating conditions that mimic normal process operation, and validating models with additional data. 3. Errors in models can arise from measurement noise, unmeasured disturbances, input variations, and applying linear models to nonlinear processes.

Uploaded by

mlarimperial
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
23 views

Imperial Assignment 11 PDC

1. The document discusses empirical model identification for process control systems through statistical and process reaction curve methods. 2. Key factors in empirical model identification are experimental design, operating conditions that mimic normal process operation, and validating models with additional data. 3. Errors in models can arise from measurement noise, unmeasured disturbances, input variations, and applying linear models to nonlinear processes.

Uploaded by

mlarimperial
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

SN GN MI IMPERIAL, LEE ANN R.

Class List 25
SIGNATURE Number
Assignment No./ 11 Chapter 6 Empirical Model Group No. 5
Title Identification
Date of November 16, 2023
Submission

Table 1.
N Te Definition/
o. rm Discussion
1 Statistical Model Statistical techniques for model identification offer greater flexibility by
Identification easing constraints on both model structure and experimental design.
Moreover, these methods utilize all available data, as opposed to relying
on a select few response points, thereby enhancing the accuracy of
parameter estimates in the presence of noisy process data.
2 Experimental The success of empirical model identification is significantly influenced
Design by the design of experimental conditions, particularly the magnitude of
input perturbation. To ensure accurate model parameter estimation, the
perturbation needs to be sufficiently large relative to other influences on
the output.
3 Operating It is advisable for the experimental conditions to closely mimic the normal
conditions operation of the process when the control system, designed based on the
model, is active. This approach is logical as substantial deviations may
introduce errors into the model, thereby diminishing the control system's
effectiveness.
4 Verification To validate the model, a conclusive step involves comparing it with
additional data not utilized in parameter estimation. While this step isn't
universally executed, it is prudent to assess the model against data
collected at a different time to ensure that typical variations in plant
operation do not substantially compromise model accuracy.
5 Model Error Errors in the model stem from factors such as measurement noise,
unmeasured disturbances, imperfect adjustments in input, and the
application of basic linear models to inherently nonlinear processes.
6 Model Structure In this chapter, equations for a first-order model have been formulated.
Similar procedures could be employed to derive other models. It is
advisable to opt for the simplest model structure that achieves a satisfactory
fit.

Table 2, Enumerated Items


N Ite Data
o. m
1 The process 1. 1. Attain a steady state for the process.
reaction curve 2. 2. Introduce a singular step change in the input variable.
method 3. 3. Gather input and output response data until the process returns to a steady state.
involves the 4. 4. Execute the graphical calculations for the process reaction curve.
following four
actions:
2 The statistical 1. 1. Implement a perturbation (or series of perturbations) in the input variable. The
method perturbation's shape is unrestricted, but its impact on the output should be
introduced here substantial for model identification.
involves the 2. 2. Acquire input and output response data. The process doesn't have to return to a
following three steady state by the experiment's conclusion.
actions: 3. 3. Compute the model parameters according to the guidelines outlined in the
following paragraphs.
3 Summary of the 1. 1. Magnitude of the input
process 2. 2. Duration of the experiment
reaction curve 3. 3. Change in the input
4. 4. Structure of the model
5. 5. Precision in the presence of unmeasured disturbances
6. 6. Diagnostic assessments
7. 7. Computational procedures
4 Summary of the 1. 1. Input magnitude
statistical 2. 2. Duration of the experiment
identification 3. 3. Alteration in the input
method 4. 4. Configuration of the model
5. 5. Precision in the presence of unmeasured disturbances
6. 6. Diagnostic evaluations
7. 7. Computational procedures

Table 3. Understandings of Chapter 6


No. My Own
Understandings
1 Empirical model identification is the process of creating mathematical representations that depict a
system's behavior using observed data. This stage is crucial for gaining insights into the dynamics
of a process.

2 For an effective control system, it is essential to have a precise model of the controlled process.
Identifying empirical models enables engineers to devise controllers tailored to the specific
characteristics of the system, enhancing overall performance.
3 Engineers can assess a system's performance under various conditions through empirical models.
This analysis is crucial for optimizing control strategies and securing the stability and robustness
of the control system.

4 Insights into the parameters and dynamics of a process are gleaned through empirical models. This
valuable information aids in fine-tuning control system parameters and optimizing the overall
performance of the system.
5 A comprehension of the empirical model facilitates the detection and diagnosis of system faults.
Comparing changes in system behavior with the anticipated behavior predicted by the model
assists in identifying issues and implementing corrective actions effectively.

6 In adaptive control strategies, empirical models frequently come into play, allowing for real-time
adjustment of controller parameters. This adaptability contributes to improved performance for
the control system, particularly in the presence of changing operating conditions.

You might also like