(Graduate Studies in Mathematics) Alberto Torchinsky - Problems in Real and Functional Analysis-American Mathematical Society (2015)
(Graduate Studies in Mathematics) Alberto Torchinsky - Problems in Real and Functional Analysis-American Mathematical Society (2015)
Problems in
Real and Functional
Analysis
Problems in
Real and Functional
Analysis
Alberto Torchinsky
Graduate Studies
in Mathematics
Volume 166
C o p y in g an d rep rin tin g . Individual readers of this publication, and nonprofit libraries
acting for them, are permitted to make fair use of the material, such as to copy select pages for
use in teaching or research. Permission is granted to quote brief passages from this publication in
reviews, provided the customary acknowledgment of the source is given.
Republication, systematic copying, or multiple reproduction o f any material in this publication
is permitted only under license from the American Mathematical Society. Permissions to reuse
portions of AMS publication content are handled by Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink®
service. For more information, please visit: h ttp ://w w w .a m s.org/righ tslin k .
Send requests for translation rights and licensed reprints to reprint-perm ission@am s.org.
Excluded from these provisions is material for which the author holds copyright. In such cases,
requests for permission to reuse or reprint material should be addressed directly to the author (s).
Copyright ownership is indicated on the copyright page, or on the lower right-hand corner of the
first page of each article within proceedings volumes.
Preface ix
P a rt 1 . P r o b le m s
Chapter 2. Measures 13
Problems 15
Chapter 5. IP Spaces 59
Problems 60
V il
vm Contents
Problems 127
Problems 150
P art 2 . S o lu tio n s
Solutions 169
Solutions 191
Solutions 249
Solutions 283
Solutions 315
Solutions 349
Solutions 365
Solutions 403
Solutions 433
Index 465
Preface
Students tell me that they learn mathematics primarily from doing prob
lems. They say that a good course is one that motivates the material dis
cussed, building on basic concepts and ideas leading to abstract generality,
one that presents the “big picture” rather than isolated theorems and results.
And, they say that problems are the most important part of the learning
process, because the problems force them to truly understand the defini
tions, comb through the proofs and theorems, and think at length about the
mathematics.
Exercises that require basic application of the theorems highlight the
power of the theorems. They also offer an opportunity to encourage stu
dents to construct examples for themselves. Problems can also be used to
explore counterexamples to conjectures. Supplying a counterexample helps
the student gain insight into theorems, including an understanding of the
necessity of the assumptions. Well-crafted problems review and expand on
the material and give students a chance to participate in the mathematical
process. Open-ended problems ( “Discuss the validity o f . . . ” ) afford the stu
dents the opportunity to adjust to researching and discovering mathematics
for themselves.
The purpose of this book is to complement the existing literature in in
troductory real and functional analysis at the graduate level with a variety of
conceptual problems, ranging from readily accessible to thought provoking,
mixing the practical and the theoretical. Students can expect the solutions
to be written in a direct language, one they can understand; always the most
“natural” rather than the most elegant solution is presented.
The book consists of twenty chapters: Chapters 1 through 10 contain
the Problems, and Chapters 11 to 20 contain (selected) Solutions. Chapters
IX
X Preface
1 to 7 cover topics in real analysis, from set theory and metric spaces to
Fubini’s Theorem, and Chapters 8 to 10 cover topics in functional analysis,
from functionals and linear operators on normed linear spaces to Hilbert
spaces. Each of the Problem chapters opens with a brief reader’s guide
stating the needed definitions and basic results in the area and follows with
a short description of the problems. There are 1,457 problems.
The notation used throughout the book is standard or else is explained
as it is introduced. “Problem 2” means that the result alluded to appears as
the second item of the chapter in question, and “Problem 3.2” means that
it appears as the second item in Chapter 3.
It is always a pleasure to acknowledge the contributions of those who
make a project of this nature possible. Mary Letourneau was the best editor
and Arlene O ’Sean the best project manager this ambitious project could
have had. M y largest debt is to the students who attended the real variables
courses I taught through the years and kept a keen interest in learning
throughout the ordeal. Many examples, counterexamples, problems, and
solutions are due to them. They also proofread the text and made valuable
suggestions. I owe them much. I assume full responsibility for any typos
that the text may have and apologize for any confusion they may cause. To
quote from John Dryden: “Errors, like straws, upon the surface flow; He
who would search for pearls must dive below.”
A . Torchinsky
Part 1
Problems
Chapter 1
Set Theory
and Metric Spaces
In this chapter we revisit basic notions of set theory and metric spaces.
W e consider sets in a naive fashion. As Cantor said, “A set is a collection
into a whole of definite, distinct objects of our intuition or our thought.”
W e say that the sets A and B are equivalent if there is a 1- 1, onto function
/ : A B. A finite set is one that is empty, denoted 0, or equivalent
to { 1 , . . . , n } for some n G N; any set that is not finite is called infinite.
Infinite sets equivalent to N are called countable, all other infinite sets are
uncountable. Often the term countable is applied to a set that is equivalent
to any subset of N.
Equivalent sets cannot essentially be told apart, which motivates the
following informal definition. W e associate with a set A its cardinal number,
denoted card(A) or o, with the property that any two equivalent sets have
the same cardinality. 0 is the cardinal number of the class of sets equivalent
to 0, n that of { 1 , . . . , n } , No that of N, and c that of [0,1] or M.
The inclusion relation for sets translates into a comparison relation for
cardinal numbers. More precisely, given cardinals a, 6, we say that a < b
if there are sets A ,B with card(A) = a and card(B) = b such that A
is equivalent to a subset of B. The Cantor-Bernstein-Schroder theorem
asserts that if there exist injective functions f :A B and g :B A,
then there exists a bijection h:A B. Thus if card(A) < card(B) and
card(B) < card (A ), then card(A) = card(B).
A s for the arithmetic operations, given cardinals a, b and disjoint sets
A, B with card(A) = a and card(B) = b, a + b is defined as the cardinal of
3
4 1. Set Theory and Metric Spaces
The problems in this chapter cover the various areas described above.
They include observations dealing with the basic set-theoretical nature of
sets, including the fact that the countable intersection of dense Gg sets
is a dense Gg set, Problem 4, and the construction and properties of the
Cantor set, or Cantor discontinuum, Problems 1 8-19 , as well as the Cantor-
Lebesgue function Problem 20. In the area of the Baire category problems
include the existence (and abundance) of functions satisfying various prop
erties, Problems 3 7 -3 8 , as well as the nature of the set of discontinuities
of a continuous function, Problems 3 5-37 . In the area of limits of continu
ous functions, we consider if x q > the characteristic function of the rationals,
is the limit of continuous functions, Problem 41, and whether pointwise
convergence corresponds to metric convergence for an appropriate metric,
Problem 42. The properties of the Baire class Bi, i.e., those functions that
are pointwise limits of continuous functions, are covered in Problems 4 3-51 .
Cardinality and cardinal arithmetic are discussed in Problems 5 4 -7 0 , and
the Hamel basis is discussed in Problems 7 2 -7 4 .
The interested reader can further consult, for instance, K . Devlin, The
Joy of Sets: Fundamentals of Contemporary Set Theory, Springer-Verlag,
2000; W . Brito, El Teorema de Categoría de Baire. Sus Aplicaciones, Edi
torial Académica Española, 2011; R .-L . Baire, Sur les fonctions de variables
réelles, Annali di M at. Ser. 3 (1899), no. 3, 1 -123.
6 1. Set Theory and Metric Spaces
Problems
3 . Let (X, d) O of X is a
be a Baire space. Prove: (a) A n open subset
Baire space in the induced metric, (b) If {Fn} are closed subsets of X with
X = (Jn Fn, then |Jn int(Fn) is dense in X.
4. Let (X,d) be a complete metric space. Prove: (a) The countable
Gs sets in X is a dense Gs set in X. (b) If a set and its
intersection of dense
complement are dense subsets of A , at most one can be Gs- (c) A countable
dense subset of X cannot be Gs-
where
n n
Prove: (a) / : C —>• [0,1] is onto, (b) If a, b are the endpoints of any of the
open intervals removed in the construction of C, then / ( a ) = f(b).
Next, if x G [0,1] \ C, x is in exactly one of the intervals (a, b) removed
from [0,1]. By (b), / ( a ) = f(b) and we define f(x) = / ( a ) for all x G (a, b).
Prove: (c) / is monotone and continuous, (d) / satisfies f(x) = 2f(x/Z) for
all x G [0,1]. (e) Determine where / fails to be differentiable.
D+f{a) = limsup f ^ /( a ) .
x— % O'
—¥ R is left-continuous at x € R if given
3 7 . Recall that a function / : R
£ > 0, there exists S > 0 such that |f(x) —f(y)\ ^ e for x ó ^ t ^ x j sim
ilarly for right-continuous. Discuss the validity of the following statement:
There exists a function / : R —> R that is left-continuous everywhere and
right-continuous nowhere.
5 4 . Prove that the set of real numbers in [0,1] which have two decimal
expansions (one terminating in 9 ’s and one in 0 ’s) is countable.
t € R , A fl (—oo, t)
5 8 . Let y l c R b e uncountable. Prove that for some
and A fl (t, oo) are both uncountable. Furthermore prove that there exist
a < b € R such that A PI (—oo, a) and A n (b, oo) are both uncountable.
A be a set of real numbers with the property that |aiH------- hon| <
5 9 . Let
1 for every finite subset a\, . . . , an of A. Prove that A is at most countable.
60. Construct A C R with card(A) = c such that A intersects every
closed nowhere dense subset of R in a countable set.
Measures
OO
W hen the above limits are equal we say that {An} converges to the common
value, which is denoted limn An.
It becomes quickly apparent that limiting operations are not necessarily
closed in an algebra, and one is thus led to the concept of cr-algebra. W e
say that an algebra M of subsets of A is a a-algebra of subsets of X if it
satisfies the additional property: (iii) If { An} c M , then (JnAn € M .
14 2. Measures
measure is said to be semifinite if p-{X) = oo and given 0 < M < oo, there
exists Ac X with M < p(A) < oo.
p) be a measure space. W e say that A e M with 0 < p{A) <
Let (X , M ,
oo is an atom if whenever B C A and p{B) < p(A), then p(B) = 0. W e say
that p is purely atomic if every measurable set of positive measure contains
an atom. A measure with no atoms is called nonatomic.
Problems
X, A C X, not necessarily in
1 1 . Let Ad be a cr-algebra of subsets of
M , and M a = { M fl A : M G M } . Prove that M a is a cr-algebra of subsets
of A .
X. Given x G X, let Cx = {A e
1 3 . Let Ad be a cr-algebra of subsets of
Ad :x G A) and Bx = C\AeCx Prove that for x ^ y, Bx,By are identical
or disjoint.Are the Bx necessarily measurable? Show that an arbitrary
union of Bx is not necessarily measurable.
0, if A is of first category,
fi(A) =
1, if A is of second category.
4 7 . Describe the measure fj, induced by T(x) = |a;| on (R, Z3(R)) endowed
with the Lebesgue measure A.
Ad and V{N). Prove that there is a unique extension ¡j,\ of /x to <S such
that (X,<S,/xi) is complete; (X, <S, /xi) is called the completion of (X, Ad, n).
Furthermore, /x is cr-finite iff fi\ is cr-finite.
sets A i, ... ,An,Aoo such that /¿(A^) = oo, the Ak are atoms with 0 <
li(Ak) < oo for k = 1 , . . . , n, and /x(X \ {A\ U . . . U An U A » ) ) = 0.
(X,M,tx) be a finite measure space and {A -}re(o,i] measurable
6 6 . Let
subsets of X satisfying Ar c As for r < s. Prove that A = flr>o Ar is
measurable and ¡x{A) = limr_+o /¿(Ar).
(X,M,fx) be a finite measure space and suppose that for some
6 7 . Let
r/ > 0, X = \JnX n with ^2niJi(Xn) < ¡x(X) + r}. Prove that for all A e M ,
E n » ( X n n A )< /x(X D A) + 7].
7 1 . Let ¡x, v be finite Borel measures on Mn such that ¡x(C) = v(C) for
every compact C. Prove that ¡x = u.
7 2 . Let ip be a nonnegative, finite, finitely additive set function on B(Mn)
that is inner regular. Prove that ip is cr-additive and, hence, a measure.
fi be a Borel measure on Mn. Prove: (a) If there is a compact set
7 3 . Let
K C R n with ¡jl{K) = oo, given rj > 0, there is an open cube Q of sidelength
less than rj such that fx(Q) = oo. (b) If \x is inner regular and V = { (J 0 : 0
is open and /x(O) = 0 }, then /x(V) = 0.
80. Let {X,M., im) be a measure space and v the set function on M
given by v{A) = sup{/x(i?) : B € M , B C A,/j,(B) < oo}, A G M . Prove:
(a)v is a semifinite measure, (b) If /x is semifinite, v = ¡j,. (c) n = u + A
where v is semifinite and the measure A assumes only the values 0 and oo.
83. Let (X,M,fi) be a measure space where ¡jl is semifinite and let A
be the set function on Mioc given by A(A) = sup{/x(B) : B c A } , A G M .
Prove that A is a saturated measure on Mioc that extends ¡jl. Discuss the
validity of the following statement: W ith v as in Problem 82, A = v.
84. LetM be a cr-algebra of subsets of X and V the linear space
of finite measures on M. Prove that the function d, in V x V given by
d(/x, v ) = sup^gju |^x(A) — v{A)\ is a distance and that (V, d) is a complete
metric space.
87. Let (X ,A 4 ,/u ) be a finite measure space and {An} C M. such that
EnM ^n \ An+1) < oo. Prove: (a) /¿(lim info A ) = /¿(lim supn A ) = L.
(b) limn / ¿ ( A ) = L.
88 . Let ( X , M , ¡jl) be a probability measure space and Ai , . . . , A o dis
tinct subsets of X with / ¿ ( A ) = 1 /3 , all n. Prove that A — {x € X : x
belongs to at least four distinct An} is a measurable set of positive measure.
Can the same conclusion be reached with only nine A ?
all A e F, then ¡1 = v. Is the result true if the measures are not <j-finite
relative to FI
9 6 . Let ( X , A4, ß) F, F\ C A4 be
be a probability measure space and let
7r-systems in X. Prove that ß(B D C) = ß(B)ß(C) for all B G Ai(F),C G
M(Fi) iff ß(B f)C) = ß(B)ß(C) for all B G F, C G Fi.
97. F be a 7r-system on X, (X,A4(F),ß) a probability measure
Let
space, and (f> : X —> X such that A4<j> C A4(F). Prove that if ß(F) =
ß ^ - ^ F ) ) for F G F, then ß(A) = ß{<j)-l{Ä)) for A G M(F).
X, Y be nonempty sets, <f> : X —¥ Y, and T>x a A-system in X.
9 8 . Let
Prove that Vy = {F € V(Y) : <f>~l{F) € T>x} is a A-system in Y.
9 9 . Let (X , A4,
ß) be a measure space, {An} c M with limn n(X\An) =
0, and G = {x G X : x belongs to finitely many An}. Prove that G is a
measurable set with ß(G) — 0.
105. Let (X,A4,ß) be a finite measure space and {An} C A4 such that
ß(An) > 77 > 0, all n. Prove that /x(lim supn An) > rj. Is the conclusion
true if ß(X) = 00? On the other hand, show that there exists a sequence
{An} as above so that for any of its subsequences {Ank}, if the measurable
set B c Ank for all nk, then ß(B) = 0.
0, x < -1,
1 + £, —1 < x < 0,
2 + x 2, 0 < x < 2,
9, x > 2.
Problems 27
1 1 9 . Given
F(x) = h x< °’
I x + n, n < x < n + 1, n = 0, 1, 2, . . . ,
find Hf (A) for an arbitrary A g S (R ).
Lebesgue Measure
This chapter is devoted to the Lebesgue measure on R re. The <7- algebra
£ ( R n) of Lebesgue measurable sets is required to contain the intervals I
of R n, i.e., those sets of the form I — {x G R n : < x* < bk,k =
1 , . . . ,n } , and the Lebesgue measure to be complete, translation invariant,
and to agree with the volume on intervals. First one defines the Lebesgue
outer measure, a nonnegative cr-subadditive set function on ^ ( R 71), and the
Lebesgue measurable sets are selected as those subsets of Rn that can be
approximated by open sets in the sense of the Lebesgue outer measure. The
Lebesgue measure is then the restriction of the Lebesgue outer measure to
£ ( R n). A of R n, the Lebesgue outer measure
Specifically, given a subset
\A\e of A is defined as the quantity |j4| e = inf { J2kv(Ik) : A C (Jfc/& },
where v(ifc) denotes the volume of the closed interval Ik and the infimum
is taken over the family of all coverings of A by countable unions of closed
intervals. The Lebesgue outer measure is additive for sets that are far apart,
A,B c R n are such that d(A,B) > 0, then \A U B\e = \A\e -f- |5|e,
i.e., if
cr-subadditive, and \I\e = v(I) for all intervals in R n.
W e say that A C Rn is Lebesgue measurable, or A G £ ( R n), if, for any
e > 0, there is an open set O D A such that |O\ A\e < e. £ ( R n) is then a
cr-algebra of subsets of Rn and the restriction of the Lebesgue outer measure
to £ ( R n) is a measure, which is called the Lebesgue measure on Rn and is
denoted |• |.
Sets in £ ( R n) can be described in one of two ways, namely, A e £ ( R n)
iff A = H U N, where H is Fa and N € £ ( R n) is null, and A G £ ( R n) iff
A = G \ N, where G is G$ and N is null. Also, for arbitrary sets A C Rn,
there exist H C A C G such that H is Fa, G is G¿, and \H\ = \A\e = |G|.
29
30 3. Lebesgue Measure
Problems
1 7 . Let A c Rn with \A\e < oo. Prove that A € £ ( R n) iff given e > 0,
there exists a finite collection of closed intervals 4 , . . . , / jvi say, such that
|a a u £ .,/» | .< í .
32 3. Lebesgue Measure
A e £ ( R n) with |A| < oo. Prove that there exists {Ak}, where
1 8 . Let
each Ak is a finite union of intervals, with the following two properties:
\irakXAk{x) = X a (x ) a.e. and |AA(lim inffc Ak) | = 0.
19. Prove that the Lebesgue outer measure is continuous from be
low. Specifically, if {A *,} C R n is an increasing sequence, then |(J*. -^fcle =
limfc\Ak\e-
20 . Suppose {Aj} c Rn is such that for a strictly increasing sequence
ni < n 2 < . . . , I U £ i Aj\e = Y T j t i \ A o\e- Prove that |U j A j\ e = E j \Aj\e-
21 . Give an example of: (a) Pairwise disjoint sets {A&} such that
\{JkAk\e < Efc \Ak\e • (b) A decreasing sequence {Ak} with |Ai|e < oo
and I f l f e ^ f c l e < limfc \Ak\e ■
2 2 . Let { Ak} C R n be such that Efc \Ak\e < oo. Prove that limsupfc Ak
is a measurable set of measure 0.
n be a Borel measure on R such that p ( ( 0 ,1]) < oo and D a
2 3 . Let
dense subset of R such that fj,(d+ (o, b]) = /¿((a, b]) for d G D and a < b € R.
Prove that ¡j, is a multiple of the Lebesgue measure on the Borel sets, i.e.,
for every A € B (R ), n{A) — c |A|, where c = ¿t((0, 1]).
33. Let A € £ (R ) with |A| < oo. Prove that |.4n(—oo, x)| = |.4 n(x,oo)|
for some i e R .
4 1 . Let A 6 £(M n) with |j4| < oo and put ip(x) = \A n (x + ^4)| for
x € Rn. Prove that lim |I|_>00 <p(x) = 0.
4 2 . Let A € £ ( R n) and B € £ ( R n) be bounded, and put <p(x) =
\A fl (x + B)|. Prove that <p(x) is a continuous function of x € R n.
4 3 . Let T : Rn —> Mn be a locally Lipschitz transformation, i.e., |T(x) —
T{y) I < Mj(\x —y | for all x , y in a compact K of R n and a constant M r
that may depend on K. Discuss the validity of the following statements: (a)
If A C Rn is bounded, \T{A)\e < oo. (b) If |4| = 0, \T(A)\ = 0. (c) T maps
measurable sets into measurable sets, (d) If A G £ ( R n) has |j4| < oo, then
\T(A)\ < oo.
34 3. Lebesgue Measure
56. Let A c Rn be such that |A fl Q\e > rj \Q\ for some rj > 0 and
all cubes Q c Rn. Prove that if A E £ ( R n), \AC\ = 0, and show that if
A £ £ ( R n), |Ac|e may be positive.
5 7 . LetA C Rn with \A\e > 0 and 0 < 77 < 1. Prove that there is a
cube Q in Rn centered at a point of A such that \A n Q\e >77 \QV
A E £ ( R n) be such that, given x ^ y £ A, (x + y)/2 £ A. Prove
5 8 . Let
that |A| = 0.
lim
i—>0+ \B(x,r)\
If d = 1 we say that x is a point of density of A and if d = 0 we say that x
is a point of dispersion of A. (a) Given xq £ R and d £ (0 ,1 ), construct a
set A c R with density d at xq. (b) Construct B with no density at 0.
exists. Discuss the validity of the following statements: (a) D(A) is well-
defined for allA £ £ (R ). (b) If D(A) and D(B) are well-defined and AnB =
0, D(A U B ) is well-defined and D(A U B) = D(A) + D{B). (c) If {Am} are
pairwise disjoint sets with well-defined density and A = |Jm Am, then A has
a well-defined density and D(A) = D(Am).
82. Prove that if A £ £ ( R n) has |^4| > 0, there is a sequence {xk} in
Rn such that |Rn \ \Jk(xk + ^)| = 0. For {a:/.} one may take any countable
dense set D in Rn.
8 3 . Let A = UceC where the Ic are intervals of length 1 /1 0 centered
at the points c of the Cantor discontinuum. Find |A|.
8 6 . Suppose that i > 3 and let 0 < m < n < t. (a) Let A = {x E [0,1] :
Xk = m or Xk — n for all k}. Prove that A is an uncountable compact set
of measure 0. (b) Let B = {x E [0,1] : m appears before n in the expansion
of x}. Prove that B is Borel and find \B\.
8 7 . Suppose thatl > 3 and let 0 < l\,li < t, i\ ^ ¿2- Let A = {x =
Yhkxk^~k e [0)1] : if xm = l\ there is n < m such that xn — 12}. Prove
that A is measurable and compute its measure.
A = {x =
8 8 . Let xk%~k ^ [0,1] : Xk = 0 ,1 , and X2k = 0 for all &}.
Prove that A is a compact, uncountable, nowhere dense set of measure 0.
1 0 8 . Does there exist a function / : R -> [0,1] such that the set D(f)
of discontinuities of / has measure 0 yet D(f) D / is uncountable for every
II
109. (C,d) denote the metric space introduced in Problem 2.88
Let
corresponding to the Lebesgue measure on I. Prove that S = {[.A] € £ :
\AHJ\ > 0 and \ACD J\ > 0 for all intervals J C 1} is of second category in
(£,d).
1 1 0 . Let {An} be positive reals such that An < oo and for A: > 0 let
Measurable and
Integrable Functions
41
42 4. Measurable and Integrable Functions
on X, let Ff = {ip : is simple and 0 < <p < / } . The integral of f over
X with respect to p is denoted fx / ( x) dp(x), or fx f dp, and is defined as
fx f dp = sup { fx ipdp : cp G Xf}. Arbitrary functions f = f + —f~ have
an integral defined by Jx f dp = fx f + dp — fx f~ dp provided at most one
of the integrals in the right-hand side of the definition is infinite.
X is integrable if Jx |/| dp < oo
W e say that a measurable function / on
and the linear space L1(X) is defined as Ll(X) = { / : / is measurable and
fx |/| dp < oo}; endowed with the metric d(f,g) = Jx \f —g\dp, {Ll(X),d)
becomes a complete metric space.
Integrable functions satisfy Chebychev’s, or Markov’s, inequality, i.e.,
V ({| / l > A>) < /{|/|>A} l/l ^ for a11 A > °-
In the case of the Lebesgue measure in Rn, or A G £ ( R n), the integral
of / is denoted fK„ f(x ) dx, or fA f(x) dx, respectively, and if a function /
defined on a finite interval of Rn is Riemann integrable, / has a Lebesgue
integral and both integrals coincide. The Lebesgue integral is translation
invariant and simple or compactly supported smooth functions are dense
e > 0, there is a simple or compactly
in L 1(Mn) in the sense that given
supported smooth function g such that d(f,g) = fRn \f(x) — g(x)\dx < e.
Also, L 1(Rn) functions are continuous in the metric, i.e., if / G L 1(Rn),
given e > 0, there exists 6 > 0 such that fRn |f(x + y) — f(x)\ dx < e
whenever \y\ < S.
A n essential feature of the Lebesgue integral is the Lebesgue differen
tiation theorem. It states that if / is locally integrable, i.e., integrable on
bounded subsets of R n, then with Q(x,r) denoting the cube centered at x
of sidelength r > 0,
lim
r->o+
Í
\Q(x,r)\ JQA
JQ(x>r)
f(y) dy = / ( x) a.e. x G
Then, the strong version of the Lebesgue differentiation theorem holds, i.e.,
almost every point in the domain of a locally integrable function / on R n is
a Lebesgue point of / .
Some of the important questions in Lx{X) concern the passing of the
limit under the integral sign. A basic result is the Beppo Levi or monotone
4. Measurable and Integrable Functions 43
Now, limits are hard to find and so Fatou’s lemma is an essential tool
in dealing with convergence. It states that if { / „ } are extended real-valued
measurable functions on X so that g < fn ¿¿-a.e. for an integrable function
g, then Jx lim infn fn dg < lim infn fx fn dg.
Then there is one of the most celebrated theorems in real variables,
namely, the Lebesgue dominated convergence theorem (L D C T ). It states
that if { / „ } are extended real-valued measurable functions onX such that
limn / n = / existsg- a.e. and |/|,|/n| < g /¿-a.e. for g € Ll(X) and all n,
then limn fx fn dg = fx f dg.
Problems
7 . Given a,b,c € R, let mid (a, b, c) denote the middle value when
a, b, c are arranged in an increasing (or decreasing) order. Let M be a cr-
algebra of subsets of X and given measurable functions / 1, / 2, / 3 , let g(x) =
mid / 2(2)1 / 3(2 ))• Prove that g is measurable.
3 8 . Let ip : [—oo, oo] -> [—oo, oo] be monotone and suppose that / :
R —> [—oo, oo] is measurable. Prove that <po f is measurable.
3 9 . Let / be a measurable function on X and g(x) = 0 if f(x ) is rational
and = 1 if f(x) is irrational. Is g measurable?
Problems 47
x = X )n V
4 2 . Let / be the function on [0,1] defined as follows: If n.
0 < xn < i — 1) let f(x) = maxn xn. Prove that / is Lebesgue measurable.
4 3 . Consider ternary expansionsx = ^ n xn3-n in [0,1) (possibly ter
x, y e [0,1), let g(x,y ) denote the smallest n such
minating in 0 ’s) and, for
that xn — yn and g(x, y) = oo if no such n exists. Prove that g is Lebesgue
measurable.
f(x + y) =
4 6 . Let / : R —»•R be a discontinuous function that satisfies
f(x) + f(y) for all x ,y € R. Prove: (a) For every irrational x there is a
sequence xn —> x such that f(xn) —> 0. (b) / - 1 ( { 0 } ) is dense in R iff for
every Hamel basis {e^}AeA ° f R over Q , T — {f(e\)} is linearly dependent
over Q. (c) If / ( 1 ) = 1, the graph G(f) of / is dense in R 2.
g : R —> [0, oo) be a continuous function such that g(0) > 0 and
6 2 . Let
g(x) = 0 if x ^ [—1,1]. Prove that if h is a measurable function such that
g(x - n) < h(x) for n = 0 , 1 , 2 , . . then h <£ L ^ R ) .
(X,M.,y) be a measure space and / a nonnegative integrable
6 3 . Let
function on X. Prove that for every e > 0, there is A € M. with y(A) < oo
such that fx fd y < JAf d y + e.
66. Let (X,M ,y) be a measure space and A C X with y(A) < oo.
Prove that for some x € A, |/(rc) | < (l/y(A)) fA |/| dy.
6 7 . Let ( X ,M.,y ) be a measure space and / a measurable function on
X such that JA f d y > 0 for all A e A4. Prove that / > 0 y- a.e. From this
deduce that if fA f dy = 0 for all A <E M , then / = 0 y- a.e.
all A€M ,
then f —g y- a.e.
70. Let ( X , M , y ) be a semifinite measure space, F c l a closed set,
and / an integrable function on X such that
7 1 . Let ( X , M ,
p) be a measure space and / G Ll(X) such that |JA f dp\
< cp(A) for all measurable A with p(A) < oo and a constant c. Prove that
|/| < c ¡i-a.e.
72. Let / € L 1(M) and c > 0. Prove that if Jjf(y)dy = 0 for all
intervals J with |J\ = c, then / = 0 a.e.
^ ( X ) . Prove that there is a nondecreasing Borel function
7 3 . Let / G
ip : R + —> R + with lim ^ o o (pit)/t = oo such that fx dp < oo.
(X,Ai,p) be a measure space, / an integrable function on X,
7 4 . Let
and g a bounded measurable function on X such that o < g{x) < b /¿-a.e.
Prove that Jx g |/| dp = c Jx |/| dp for some c with a < c < b .
0, x rational, 0, x rational,
f(x) = and g(x)
[1/x ], otherwise, [ l /* ] > otherwise.
82. Compute
n 71
Prove that / and g axe well-defined and compute their integrals over I.
84. Discuss the validity of the following statement: n is a Borel
If
measure on R such that (f^ t dfi(t))2 = / Q
x t3 dy,(t) for all x > 0, then y, is
the Lebesgue measure on B(R ).
7r/ 2 cos(i)
/( * ) = f dt, x > 0.
Jo t+ X
Prove that / is well-defined and continuous, give the asymptotic expres
sions for / at 0+ and oo, and determine, if they exist, limx_ >0+ f(x) and
lim ^ o o f(x).
98. fa and ga denote the functions on R given by / o(0) = 0 and
Let
fa(x) = l / ( № + M 1/a) for x ± 0, and ga(y) = / 0°° fa(x) cos(xy) dx, re
spectively. Find the values of a > 0 for which: (a) fa G L 1(R ). (b)
xfa(x) € ^ ( R ) . (c) ga G C 1^ ) -
9 9 . Let F{x) be given by
(a) Compute l i m ^ - o o F(x) and l i m . ^ - F(x). (b) Prove that for all k the
derivative F ^ of order k of F is given by
OO J-X
/
3 ^ 2 Ink(t)dt, x G ( oo, 1 ).
(c) Prove that F'(x)2 < F(x)F"(x), x g ( —oo, 1), and conclude that the
function ln (F )(x ) is convex in ( —oo, 1).
1 0 7 . Let / be a locally integrable function on [0, oo) such that for each
a > 0, / 0°° \f(x)\ e~ax dx < oo. Does it follow that / is integrable? W h at if
there exists M such that / 0°° \f(x)\e~axdx < M < oo, all a > 0? W h at can
one say about / if there exists M' such that / 0°° \f(x)\eax dx < M' < oo, all
a > 0?
108. Given / on R + , letF(x) = ^2nf(n2x), x > 0. Prove: (a) If /
is integrable, the series defining F(x) converges absolutely for a.e. x > 0,
F is integrable, and / 0°° F(x) dx = A / 0°° f(x) dx where A is a constant to
be determined, (b) If / is continuous and (1 + x)f(x) is bounded, F{x) is
defined for all x > 0, and lima._>0+ ^fxF(x) = B exists where B is a constant
to be determined.
1 1 5 . LetA G £(R fc) and e > 0. Prove that there exist l e R * and r > 0
such that \AC\ B(x,r)\/\B(x,r)\ < e or 1 — e < \A fl B(x,r)\/\B(x, r)|.
1 1 6 . Discuss the validity of the following statement: There exists A e
£ (R ) such that if f(x) = |^4 n ( —l ,x ) | , / '( 0 ) = 1 /4 .
1 1 7 . Given a closed subset F of R , let S(x) = d(x,F). Prove that
6(x 4- y)/\y\ —> 0 as |y| —> 0 for a.e. x G F.
1 1 8 . Let / G L{I). (a) Does there exist x G I such that Jq f(y)dy =
J*1 f(y) dyl (b) W h at can one say about / if f{y) dy = f* f(y) dy for all
x € /?
1 1 9 . Prove that if / G L 1([a, 6]) satisfies
1 2 4 . Let / G L 1(Rn). Prove that given e > 0, there exist: (a) R > 0
and B C {|x| > I?} with |5| < s such that |/| < e for x G {|x| > R}\B.
(b) B G £ ( R n) such that |i?| < e and f(x) X b c(%) 0 as |x| oo.
125. Let / G L 1(R ), { / ? n } a positive sequence and { a n} such that
Y,nPn/\otn\ < oo- Prove that limn /3n|/(o:nx)| = 0 a.e.
1 2 6 . W e say that a function (p on Rn is radial if <p(x) = </?(|x|), x / 0.
Prove that if <p is a nonnegative, nonincreasing, integrable radial function,
then linift-Kx, BF(p(R) = 0.
1 3 0 . Let /£ L 1([ 0 ,1]). (a) Prove that there is a sequence {an} decreas
ing to 0 such that an| /(an)| -¥ 0. (b) Let {/& } be integrable functions. Does
there exist a sequence {£>„} decreasing to 0 such that limn bn\fk{bn)\ —> 0 for
all*?
1 3 1 . Suppose that / € L 1( [ 0 , 1]) and l i m ^ ! - f{x) — A. Compute
xn even.
xn odd.
163. Let / : [0, oo) —>■ [0, oo) be continuous, nonincreasing, and inte
grable. Prove that
L P Spaces
59
60 5. I ß Spaces
= c | /(x )|p_1 ¿¿-a.e. Also, fx \fg\ dp < ||/||i||fl'||oo, with equality when \g\ =
Iblloo
Next, Minkowski’s inequality states that if f,g € LP{X)^ 1 < p < oo,
then ||/ + g ||p — Il/llp + ||p||p- The case of equality here depends on p. For
1 < p < oo the condition is: There exist nonnegative constants A, B not
both 0 such that A f = Bg p- a.e. On the other hand, if p = 1 the condition
is: There exists a nonnegative measurable function h such that fh = g p- a.e.
on the set { f g ^ 0} .
Finally, Minkowski’s integral inequality states
Problems
(X, M,p) be a finite measure space, 0 < p < oo, and / ^ LP(X).
3 . Let
Prove that /X {|/|> a} ^ I^(X) for any A > 0.
4 . Let ( X , M,p) be a measure space and 0 < p < oo. Given a measur
able function / on X , let
6 . Let (X,M,p) be a measure space and 1 < p < oo. Prove that
f e u > ( x ) iff E n « ‘ (p+1)M { I /I > i/™ }) + E n nP“ V ( { l / l > n >) < oo.
7. Let <p be a nonnegative, nonincreasing measurable radial function
and 0 < p < oo. Prove that ¡p G L ^ R ” ) iff EfeL-oo 2fen y>(2fe)p < oo.
8 . For 0 < a < /3 < oo, consider
1*1 < I»
1*1 > 1-
For what values of p are f,g in Lp(Rn)?
62 5. IP Spaces
20. For / 6 IP(I), 1 < p < oo, let irn(f) : [0,1] —>■ R be given by
7Tn/(0) = 0 and irnf(x) = 2n f(y)dy if k2~n < x < (k + l)2~n for
k € { 0 , . . . , 2n - 1} , n > 1. Prove: (a) |7rn/(x )| p < 7rn|/(a:)|p for x € [0,1],
and, consequently, ||7rn(/)||p < ||/||p. (b) limn 7rn( / ) = / in IP(I).
fk(y)g{x-y)dy.
23. (X, M , p ) be a measure space and 0 < p < oo. Prove that p is
Let
cr-finite iff IP(X) contains a strictly positive function.
Problems 63
77 = sup sup
\f(x) — f(y)\ < 00 .
\x-y\a
5 3 . Let ( X ,M , p) be a measure space and 0 < p < q < oo. Prove that if
/ G D>{X) n Lq(X), then / G U {X ) for p < r < q and ||/||r < ||/||J | | /1| ^
where 0 < r¡ < 1 is given by the relation r = rjp + (1 — rj)q. W h a t if
/ G W k - I 7 ( X ) n W k -Lq(X) instead?
55. Let / G LP{I) and 0 < p < q < oo. Prove that given e > 0
K > 0, there exists a function g
and G LP(I) such that ||/ — g\\p < £ and
MU > K.
5 6 . W e say that a locally integrable function / on R has weak derivative
g if fRf(x)p/(x) dx = — / R g(x)g>(x) dx for all compactly supported smooth
functions <p. Prove: (a) / has weak derivative 0 iff / = c a.e. (b) If
/ G I 7 (R ), 1 < p < oo, / has weak derivative 0 iff / = 0 a.e.
5 7 . Let ( X , M , p ) be a measure space and 0 < p < q < oo. Prove that
LP{X) Lq{X) iff X contains sets of arbitrarily small positive measure.
5 8 . Let ( X , M , p ) be a measure space and 0 < p < q < oo. Prove that
Lq{X) <f. LP{X) iff X contains sets of arbitrarily large finite measure. How
about q = oo?
66 5. IP Spaces
6 0 . Let (X,M.,p) be a measure space and 0 < p,q < oo. W hen are
IP{X) and L*{X) equal?
6 1 . Let limp ^ (p ) = oo. Construct a function / G P|
p<00 LP(I) \ L°°(I)
such that limp ||/||p = oo and ||/||p < 'L(p) for all p large.
6 2 . Let p be a nonatomic Borel measure on Rn and / G L 1(Rn) with
A*({|/l > 0 }) > 0. Given 1 < p < oo, construct a measurable function g such
that Jr » l / s l dp < co and fRn |/| \g\pdp = oo.
6 3 . Discuss the validity of the following statements: (a) Simple functions
are dense in L°°(I). (b) CQO, 1]) is dense in LP([0,1]), 1 < p < oo.
64. M = {^4 G M : p(A) = 0} ,
Let ( X , M , p ) be a measure space,
and for measurable / let A(f) = {A G R : {|/| > A} G M}. Prove: (a) If
A(f) = 0, ll/lloo = OO. (b) If A(f) JL 0, |/| < H/lloo p-a.e. and ||/||oo € A(f).
65. Let ( X , M , p ) be a measure space and / G L°°(X). Prove that
/ > 0 p-a.e. iff ||A - / ||oo < A for a ll A > ||/||oo-
66 . Let (X , M , p ) be a measure space and / a real-valued measurable
function on X. The //-essential infimum of / , or plainly the essential infimum
of / , is defined as ess inf / = sup{A : p({f < A}) = 0 }. Prove that if / ± 0
is nonnegative, ess inf / = 1/e ss s u p ( l //) .
70. Let / e L °°([a, &]) be such that linxE_i.a+ f(x) = 7 exists. Discuss
the validity of the following statement:
lim / *
f( x) dx
*-►»+ Ja y / ( x - a)(t - X)
exists.
7 6 . Given / € Zf1( [0 ,1]) and 0 < p < 00, let fp(x) = pxp~1f(xp). Dis
cuss the validity of the following statement: limp_ ,i JJ0 \fp(x) — f(x)\ dx =
0.
77. p be a probability Borel measure on M and <p, ip monotone
Let
functions on R. If p, are monotone in the same sense (i.e., both decreasing
or increasing), prove: (a) (fRi/>(f)dp) (fR<p(f)dp) < dp. (b)
79. Let ( X , M , p ) be a measure space and 1 < p < 00. Suppose that
/ G LP(X) satisfies fx fgdp = 0 for all g e V, a dense class in Lq(X) where
1 /p + 1/q = 1. Prove that / = 0 p-a.e.
68 5. IP Spaces
(b) Let / be a nonnegative locally integrable function such that for 0 < r < 1
and 1 < p < oo, Jq00 x~T(xf(x))pdx < oo. If F(x) = JJ° f(t) dt, x > 0, then
f x rF(x)pdx
(* r f x r(xf(x))pdx.
ж1/ 2
1=
(1 — ж)1/ 3
9 9 . Let / G L 1(M) n L 2(M) and put /o (x ) = xf(x). Prove that ||/||2 <
8 II/II2 II/0 II2 .
100 . Let (X,M,p) be a probability measure space and / an integrable
function on X such that p({f ± 0 }) < 1. Prove that limp_ ,0+ ||/||p = 0.
101 . Let (X,M,p) be a finite measure space and / e Lr(X) for some
0 < r < 00. Does limp_).0+ Jx \f\pdp exist? If so, what is it equal to?
infy [fx fgdp/(Jx f pdp)1 p], and if 0 < ||/g||i < oo equality in (a) holds
iff A\f\p = B\g\q p-a.e. on X for some A, B > 0.
. Let (X,M,p) be a finite measure space and 1 < p < r < oo.
12 0
Compute M = sup{||/||p/||/||r : / G Lr( X ) , / ^ 0 }.
“ “ n ln 11/1100 '
(b) If h is a bounded continuous function on X,
lim — In
» n
( f
\Jx
e~nhdp] = — m in h(x) .
/ xex
converges absolutely a.e., and that the statement is not true for e = 1.
(X,M,p) be a measure space, / a function on X such that
1 2 7 . Let
ll/llp <cpv, where c is a constant independent on p, and 0 < tj < 1. Prove
that / is exponentially integrable and / x (exp(( 7 |/(x)|)1/ T?) — l)dp(x) < ci
where c\ is a constant independent of / and 7 = rjl^v/Qc.
x = {xn} be a sequence such that Yhn n\xn\p < oo. Prove that
1 3 6 . Let
x £ (P for 0 < r < p < 2r.
1 3 7 . Discuss the validity of the following statements: (a) A = {x £ £2 :
\xn\< 1 /n for all n } is closed in t2. (b) B = {x £ £2 : \xn\< 1/n for all n }
is open in £2.
Y c Lx(X) a closed
1 5 0 . Let ( X ,M ,f i ) be a finite measure space and
subspace of Ll(X) with the property that if / € Y, then / 6 IP(X) for
some p > 1. Prove that there is a fixed p > 1 so that Y c IP(X).
151. Let / € L 1(R n) n L °°(R n) satisfy ||/||oo < tt/ 2. Prove that
lim*; fRnsink(f(x)) dx = 0. W h a t if / € IP(Rn) instead, 1 < p < oo?
152. Show that L 1(R) D L 2(R) is not closed in ( £ 1( R ) ,I H I i ) or in
( £ 2(R ), II • Ik).
(XtM,p) be a finite measure space and 1 < p < oo. Explain
1 5 3 . Let
the following situation: IP(X) is separable but the subspace IP(X)nLco(X),
which is dense in both IP(X) and L°°(X), is not separable.
154. Let (X,M,p) be a measure space and 1 < p < r < oo. Prove
that ||/|| = ¡/U p + ||/||r is a norm in IP(X) n Lr{X) and that ( IP(X) n
Lr(X), || • ||) is a Banach space. Furthermore, if p < Q < r, the inclusion
map LP{X) n Lr(X) Lq{X) is continuous.
155. O be an open set of finite measure in M.N and 1 < p < oo.
Let
W e denote Ilc{0 ) = { / € IP(0) : s u p p (/) C O is compact} and Lfoc(0) =
{ / : O —>■R : / is measurable and fxK G LP{0) for all compact K C O}.
(a) Equip L^oc(0) with a complete metric d such that for each sequence
{fn} c q j O ) and / G L?oc( 0 ) , lim nd(fnJ ) = 0 ifflim re \\(fn~ f)x K\\P = 0
for all compact K C O. (b) Prove that Lc(0) is dense in (Lfoc(0),d).
Sequences of Functions
75
76 6. Sequences o f Functions
allow for the limit to be taken under the integral sign, including norm con
vergence. converges to f in LP(X), 0 < p < oo, if
W e say that { / n}
limn ||fn — f\\p = 0. And, we say that { / n}
converges weakly to f in IP(X),
1 < p < oo, and write fn f in IP(X), if limn Jx fng dp = fx fg dp for all
g G Lq(X), where q is the conjugate Holder index of p given by the relation
l / p + l / q = l.
The interested reader can further consult his or her favorite real variables
textbook or the classics, including I. P. Natanson, Theory of junctions of a
real variable, Ungar Publishing Co, 1955; and E. Hewitt and K . Stromberg,
Real and abstract analysis, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1965.
Problems
respectively, are metrics on T. (b) Discuss the validity of the following state
ment: ( C(I ), d) is a complete metric space, (c) Prove that limn d(fn, / ) = 0
iff limn di(fn, f) = 0 iff fn -»• / in measure.
41. Let ( X,A4,p ) be a measure space and {/n }> / nonnegative inte
grable functions on X such that fn - * / ¿¿-a.e. and fx fn dp —)■ fx f dp. (a)
Prove that for every measurable A c X, limn fA fn dp = JAf dp. (b) W hat
if /»» -> / in measure instead? (c) W h at if the functions are allowed to have
variable sign? If / 0 L 1( X ) ?
Problems 81
42. Let(X, A4, ¡i) be a measure space and { /„ },< ? integrable func
tions on X such that |/n | < g ¿¿-a.e. and fn —> / in measure. Prove that
limn Jx fn dg> = Jx f dji-
(X,M,ff) be a measure space and { / n}, {gn} measurable func
4 3 . Let
tions on X such that gn, g are integrable, gn ->• g in Ll{X), fn ->■ / in
measure, and |/n| < gn ¿¿-a.e., all n. Prove that lim„ fx \fn — /| d¿¿ = 0.
<Pm(x) = supn>m |/n(x)|, <pm # ^ ([O .o o )). (d) Given e > 0, it is not true
that limm |{<pm > e}| =0.
fn(x) = (n /ln (n ))x (o ,i/ 7i)(a;)- Verify
5 4 . Let { / n} be given on [0,1] by
that f n —^0 a.e. and prove that fj fn{x) dx —$■0 although for no ip € L(I)
does it hold that fn < <p a.e. for all n and, consequently, the L D C T does
not apply.
5 5 . Let a € R. Compute
f°° 1
!T n l ( I T S 5) dx'
56. fn{x) = n2x( 1 — x)n on [0,1]. Find f(x) = limn / n(æ) and
Let
decide whether limn fg fn(x) dx = fg f(x) dx.
5 9 . Find
f 2n ( x\n
lim / ( 1 -------) dx.
™ Ji V n/
6 0 . Let (p in L°°(R + ). Find limn fg xne~nx<p(x) dx.
61. Prove that G(x) = n -2 ln (l + n2x), x > 0, is continuously
differentiable and compute G'{x).
6 2 . Let F(x) = Yjne~nXani an > 0, x > 0. Prove that Y^nan < oo iff
the right-hand derivative of F exists at the origin.
~ l _ e -bx ’
x e R+ .
66 . Compute Jq x x dx.
6 7 . Find sequences {An}, {Bn} c R such that limn An = limn Bn = R,
lim / _ X „ dx ± lim / , X -z dx ,
N JAn 1 + Z2 N JBn 1 + X2
and both of the limits are finite.
7 1 . Prove that
X 7T
lim
r ^ + x> + l nätt{x/n)dx = m -
Jo
7 2 . In Rn, let \f{x)\ < (1 + M ) a , ot < 1. Find
lim f
A->oo J Rn
f(x) , 1|„hn+i Asin(|ar|/A)
|x|(l + |x|)n+
dx.
7 3 . Calculate
POO
lim / dx
n J0o 11 + (x/2n)n + ¿ j sm (x - 1e*) cos(x) - 2
lim
n f e Xsinn( x + rn)dx = 0 .
84 6. Sequences o f Functions
7 9 . Calculate
(b) limn ||/n - /||p = 0 iff H/nllp ->■ ||/||p- (c) W h a t can be said about the
case p = oo?
(X,M,/x) be a measure space, 0 < p < oo, and { / n} , / mea
8 5 . Let
surable functions on X. Prove that if ||/n ||p < c and / n —> / /x-a.e., then
p - |/ - f n\p - \f\p\d,x = 0.
limn fx |\fn\
88. Let ( X,M,fx ) be a measure space, 1< p< oo, and { / „ } c LP{X)
such that IIfn ||p < oo. Prove that fn —>■0 fx-a.e.
89. (X,M,/x) be a probability measure space, { / n} independent
Let
square integrable functions on X with ||/n||2 < M for all n, and
Prove: (a) H^nlb —> 0. (b) naipn —> 0 in measure for a < 1 /2 .
Problems 85
u>(X) = lim w( X, e ) ,
£->0+
then oj(T) = 0. (c) Let Bftn = {|/| > R}. If u{T) is given by
Verify that the inequality may be strict and that it may fail unless supn fn €
L\X).
107. (X, A f, /x) be a measure space and 1 < p < oo. Prove that
Let
{fn} on X is Cauchy in LP^X) iff the following conditions hold: (a) { / n}
is Cauchy in measure, (b) {| /n |p} is uniformly absolutely continuous, (c)
Given e > 0, there is a set A with p(A) < oo such that fAc \fn\pd/x < e for
all n.
114. Let (X,Ai,fj,) be a measure space and 0 < p < oo. Suppose
that 0 < r < p, and let q = rp/(p —r ). Prove that if ||/n — /||p —>• 0 and
lift» - Sllg -A 0, then ||/npn - fg\\r 0.
115. Let(X,M,p) be a measure space, 1 < p < oo, and { / n} , /
nonnegative functions on X such that limn / n = / in IP{X). Prove that
in L'I'(X) for all r € \l,p).
88 6. Sequences o f Functions
1 1 6 . Let ( X , _A4,/x) be a measure space and 1 < p < oo. Prove: (a) If
f,g e U’iX), then / V g = m a x (/, g) e L ^ X ) . (b) If fn f and gn ->■ g in
LP(X), then fn V gn -»• / V g € D>{X).
117. Let { / n} be measurable functions on I such that / „ —> f uni
formly in [e, 1] for each 0 < e < 1, and fj \fn(x)\p dx < c for c > 0, some
1 < p < oo, and all n. Discuss the validity of the following statement:
limn fj |fn(x) - f(x)\dx = 0.
Finally, give examples of such functions ip and prove that the conclusion
is true for <p(x) = ln (l -I- x), which is unbounded.
134. Let ( X , M , p) be a measure space and {fn} integrable functions on
X such that ||/n ||i > ry > 0 for a ll n and if An = {| /n | > 0 }, limn p(An) = 0.
Prove that limn ||/„||p = oo, 1 < p < oo.
90 6. Sequences o f Functions
in L 2([0, 1]).
and
(a) Show that ( X , p) is not a complete metric space, (b) Describe a complete
sequence space (F, p) such that X is dense in Y. (c) W h at if X is endowed
with || • ||oo?
1 4 2 . Let {an¡k} C R with la^fcl < 1 for n, k — 1 , 2 , . . . , and lim*, an>k = 0
for each n. Prove that lim*, an>k/np = 0 for p > 1.
1 4 3 . Let ( X , M , p ) be a finite measure space, 0 <
a < /3, and {fn},9
integrable functions on X such that ||/re||i < c and n _a|/„|2 < g p- a.e.
Compute limn n~P Jx \fn\2 dp.
{X,M,p) be a measure space and { / n} nonnegative measur
1 4 4 . Let
able functions on X such that there exist M > 0 and positive convergent se-
ries J2nan> YsnPri < 00 such that f{fn<M} fndp < an and p({fn > M}) <
(3n for all n. Prove that fn{x) < oo p- a.e.
145. Let / fn(x) = nf(nx), all n.
€ L X(R) have integral 1 and put
Discuss the validity of the following statement: / „ —1 / in L 1(R).
Problems 91
146. Let / in L P ( R n ), 1 <p < oo, and with a > 0 real, define
fn(x) = na f(nx), n = 1, 2, — Does { / n} converge strongly in 1P{R ^ )?
Weakly inU>(RN)7
(X,M,p) be a <r-finite measure space and { / n} , / in U’(X),
1 4 7 . Let
1 < p < oo. Prove that / n —1 / in LP{X) iff ||/n ||p < c for all n and
X 4 /n d/x —» fAf dp, for all A with p(A) < 00.
1 4 8 . Let (X,M,p) be a cr-finite measure space, 1 < r < p < 00, and
{ / n} measurable functions on X such that ||/n ||p < c and ||/n ||r —> 0. Prove
that fn 0 in LP(X).
149. Let (X,M,p) be a measure space, 1 < p < 00, and { / n} mea
surable functions on X such that ||/n ||p < c, and fn(x) = 0 or \fn(x)\ > n
)U-a.e. for all n. Prove that fn —L0 in LP{X).
153. Let (X, A4, 9) be a measure space, 1 < p < 00, and { / „ } C IP^X).
Discuss the validity of the following statement: If fn —l / in ^ ( X ) , a
subsequence { / nfc} of { / n} converges to / /z-a.e.
(a) Let 1 < p < a. Prove that lim n ||/n ||p = 0. (b) Prove that { / n}
converges weakly to 0 inIP for p = a. Does { / n} have a strongly convergent
subsequence? (c) Let p > a. Does { / n} converge strongly in Lp([—1, 1])? If
not, does it have a weakly convergent subsequence?
Product Measures
This result serves as a starting point towards the definition of the product
measure p®v on A t ® Af. Specifically, if ( X , A t , p) and (V, A/", v) are cr-finite
measure spaces, p ® u is the unique cr-finite measure on A t ® A/* such that
p ® v{A x B) = p(A) v(B) for all A x B E 1Z. Moreover, for E E A t ® A/-,
p ® v(E) can be computed in one of three ways, namely,
93
94 7. Product Measures
Problems
is the unique c-finite measure on the cr-algebra defined in (a) that assigns
to Ai x A2 x c X\ x X 2 x X 3 the value (m1 <g> fJ>2)(Ai x A^p^A?) =
.A3
Mi C^i )M2 {M)pz ( ^ 3) •
1 0 . Let (X,M,p) and (Y,Af, v) be cr-finite measure spaces such that
(X xY,M.<S> Ai, m x v) is complete. Prove that if A f contains a nonempty
null set, then M = V(X).
11. Characterize: (a) "P(N) <g> 'P(N). (b) p ® p, where p denotes the
counting measure on N.
1 6 . For eachx G R , let Lx denote the closed line segment in the plane
joining (x, 0) and (0 ,2 ). For each i c R , the triangle T(A) over A is defined
as T(A) = {Lx : x G A}. Prove that for A G # (R ), T(A) is measurable in
the plane and X2 (T(A)) = A (A ).
that
f tn
7t(B x { n } ) = / e_t — cfyi(i), all n.
Jb n-
(c) Give an example where ir is and is not given by a product of measures
on B(R + ) and P (N ).
2 2 . Let ( X , M , y ;) be a measure space and for
A C X and 0 < a < oo,
put Aa = { ( x ,y ) : a; € A ,0 < y < a } for finite a and A qq = { ( x ,y ) : x G
A, 0 < y < oo}. Prove that if A G M , then Aa G Ai <8>B (R ) and compute
y<g>\(Aa).
2 3 . Let ( X , M , y ) be a <r-finite measure space and / : X —¥ R a non
negative function with graph T ( / ) = { ( x , / ( x ) ) G X x R + : x G X } . Prove
that if / : ( X , M ) —)• K is measurable, y, <8> A ( r ( /) ) = 0.
e-MJ T 7 v ~ T i jQiy<
\Q[y,e)\ / e) / ( * » = y) •
4 0 . Let ([0,1], -<) be a well-ordering of [0,1] with ordinal ÍÍ. Prove that
if S = { ( « , y) G [0,1] x [0,1] : x < y} and / = xs, the iterated integrals of
/ exist but are not equal.
s:s:
48. Let / be a nonnegative measurable function on [0,1]. Prove that
49. Let g G Z/1(R). Find those values of a for which the function
<f>ix,t) = |x|- a ía - 1y p )X [-t,í](a:) is integrable on R x R + .
50. Let / G Z/X(R) satisfy f R f R / ( 4 x ) / ( x + y ) dXix) dXiy) = 1. Compute
/* /< « •
5 1 . Let / : Z x I —>■ R be given by fix,y) = (1 — xy)~a where o > 0.
(a) Discuss the validity of the following statement: The following three
quantities are equal: / 7 Jf fix, y) d A p ) dA(y), Jf fix, y) dA(y) dA(x), and
f i x I f dX2 - (b) Establish for what values of a, fIxI f dX% < oo.
66 . Calculate
roo roo 1
j = l L d + !/) ( i + ^ ) ix(x)ixw
and deduce the value of
{ 1, m = n,
- 1, m = n + l,
0, otherwise.
f
Jorco X
sin(x)
68 .d X(x
Compute
).
Prove that Tf(x ) = fRn k(x, y)f{y) d\n(y) maps L 2(Rn) boundedly into
itself with norm < A.
81. Let (X,M,p) be a finite measure space, / , g measurable func
tions on X, pf,pg the image measures defined in Problem 4.58, $ ( x ) =
( / ( * ) , 0 (x )), x G X, and /lí$ the image measure defined in Problem 4.58.
Prove that / , g are independent iff = pf <g>pg.
90. Let f,g be compactly supported C'1(R) functions. Prove that f*g G
C 2(R).
Lt = \x G R n : fix) = lim
• 'l h-+oh hn
A—>o+
98. Suppose that for all compactly supported functions f,g on Rn,
11/ * 5||r < ll/llp \\g\\q for some 1 < p,q,r < oo. Find a relation the indices
p, q, r satisfy.
99. Let g be a nonnegative measurable function on Rn such that
11/ * i?llp < c ||/||p for all nonnegative / € L ^ R ” ), 1 < p < oo, and some
constant c. Prove that ||p||i < c.
100 . Suppose that / € L ^ R ” ) and that ||/ * g||p < c||^||i for all g G
L 1(Rn) and some constant c. Prove that ||/||p < c.
105
106 8. Normed Linear Spaces. Functionals
The interested reader can further consult, for instance, N. Dunford and
J. Linear operators, General theory, W iley Classics Library,
T . Schwartz,
Functional analysis, Springer-Verlag, 1980; and J. Conway,
1988; K . Yosida,
A course in functional analysis, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1990.
Problems
X
Ik - y|l > j (M l + Hull)
11*11 ll.'Vll
Are these inequalities sharp?
every permutation o of the integers, the series Yjn xo{n) converges to the
same limit.
N 1
P(x) =
1 + IMI '
1 6 . Prove that all norms on a linear space are equivalent iff the space
is finite dimensional.
d(x, Y )
sup = 1.
o^xex 11*11
3 3 . LetX be a normed linear space with unit ball ¿3(0,1). Prove that if
for some r > 1 the closed ball ¿3(0, r) of X can be covered by finitely many
translates of ¿3(0,1), then X is finite dimensional. From this deduce that if
a closed ball in X is compact, X is finite dimensional.
3 5 . Prove that a Banach space is finite dimensional iff each of its sub
spaces is closed.
| z(t)-a;(a )|
P a{x) = SUp
tyStzIJ^S \t~s\a
and let Ca{I) = {a; € C(I) : pa(x) < oo}. Prove that pa is a seminorm on
Ca(I) and introduce a norm in Ca(I) that turns it into a Banach space.
50. x G Ca{I), l i m ^ ,* - ||ar||jg = ||a;||a . (b ) If xn ->■ x
Prove: (a) For
in C{I) and ||xn ||a < 1 for all n, then xn —> x in C&{I) for ¡3 < a. (c) For
ft < a, S = {x E CP{I) : ||®||a < 1} is compact in C^{I).
5 1 . Prove that Ca(I), 0 < a < 1, is of first category in C{I).
Problems 113
5 5 . Consider the unit ball BCy) in C(I) and 4> '■Bc(i) - t K a continuous
map. Is <(>necessarily bounded?
IN -
8 9 . Let X be a normed linear space, M > 0, and suppose x € X satisfies
\L(x) | < M for all bounded linear functionals L on X with ||L|| < b. Prove
that ||a;|| < Mjb.
9 0 . Let £ be in a real Banach space and x,y E B with ||a:|| = ||y|| = 1
such that ||x + 2y\\ = \\x - 2y\\ = 3. Prove that ||Ax + py\\ = |A| + |p| for all
reals A, p.
9 1 . For 1 < P < oo, - o o < s < oo, let hp s = {x : X )n ( ( l + n )s |xn |)p <
oo}, 1 < p < oo, and h™ = {x : supn( l + n )s|a;n | < oo}. Prove: (a)
||{(1 + n)sxn]\\tP ~ ll((l + np)slpxn}\\lp, 1 < p < oo. (b) HzIlfcP =
||{ (l+n)sxn}\Up is a norm and (hp, ||•||ftp) is a Banach space, (c) If s > r > 0
and ||yn ||fcP < c for all n, a subsequence {ynk} of {yn} converges to some
y E hr, i.e., closed balls in hp
s are compact in hp for s > r > 0. (d) lp is dense
in h?s, all p and s. (e) hp* = hq _ s where 1 < p < oo and q is the conjugate
to p.
Problems 117
m = k,
Lm(xk) —
m^k.
111 . Let Loo be the functional on c given by Loo(x) = limn xn. (a) Prove
that Loo is a bounded linear functional and compute its norm, (b) Discuss
the validity of the following statement: L00 is of the form Loo(x) = ynxn
for some y G £l. (c) Prove that there exists L in i°°* such that L\c = Loo-
(d) Is L in (c) unique? (e) Prove that if L is as in (c) and xn > 0 for all n,
then L(x) > 0. (f) Let S(x) = y where yn = r n+ i , n = 1, 2, . . . , denote the
shift map in i°°. Prove that there is an extension L of Loo with ||L|| = 1
that is shift invariant, i.e., L(S(x)) = L(x), x G £°°.
k—1
n= 0
122 . Let X be the space of sequences X — {x : Yhn 2n|x?i| < c»o}. Prove
that ||x||x = 2n|xn| is a norm on X and describe X*.
1 2 3 . Identify the closure of (P in cq.
{
nt, t E [0 ,1 /n ],
2 —nt, i € [ l / n , 2/n ],
0, otherwise.
Prove that xn —L0.
145. C(I) equipped with the sup norm and {xn} C C(I).
Consider
xn —L0 in C(I). (b) xn(t) -> 0
Prove that the following are equivalent: (a)
for all t E I and supn ||xra||oo < oo.
146. Consider C{[—1,1]) endowed with the sup norm and define the
bounded linear functionals Ln, L on C{[—1,1]) by Ln(x) = (n /2 ) / ^ { ”n x(t) dt
and L(x) = x (0), x E C ( [ - l , 1]), respectively. Discuss the validity of the
following statements: (a) ||Ln|| = 1 and lim nLn(x) = L(x) for a ll x E
C -a -1 ,1 ] ) . (b) limn \\Ln - L\\ = 0.
125
126 9. Normed Linear Spaces. Linear Operators
closable if there is a linear mapping T : D(T) —> Y such that G(T) = G(T);
T is called the closed linear extension, or closure, of T.
A continuous linear mapping T : X —» Y is said to be compact if T maps
bounded sets in X to precompact sets in Y, i.e., sets with compact closure.
Or, if Bx denotes the unit ball in X, T(Bx ) is compact in Y . Alternatively,
given a bounded sequence {xn} in X, { T ( x n) } has a convergent subsequence
in Y.
The basic principles in the theory of bounded linear operators between
Banach spaces include the uniform boundedness principle, open mapping
theorem, and closed graph theorem. First, the uniform boundedness prin
ciple. Let X and Y be Banach spaces. W e say that a family T = { T } c
B(X, Y) is pointwise bounded if supTe7- ||T(x)||y < oo for every x 6 X. The
uniform boundedness principle asserts that, if T is pointwise bounded, T is
uniformly bounded, i.e., supTej- ||Tj| < oo.
Next, the open mapping theorem. W e say that a continuous linear map
ping T : X Y is open if T maps open sets in X to open sets in Y .
The open mapping theorem asserts that, if B, B\ are Banach spaces and
T : B -4 B\ is a continuous surjective linear operator, then T is open.
An immediate consequence of the open mapping theorem is the inverse
mapping theorem which states that if B, B\ are Banach spaces and T : B -4
B\ is a bijective continuous linear operator, then T is an isomorphism, i.e.,
T~l : B\ —►B is a well-defined continuous linear mapping.
Finally, the closed graph theorem asserts that if B , B\ are Banach spaces
and T : B - » B\ is a linear operator with G(T) closed in 6 x B j, then T is
bounded.
Now, the notion of the adjoint operator of a linear mapping is an exten
sion of the transpose of a matrix. Let T € B(X, Y). The adjoint T* of T is
defined as the linear mapping T* : Y* - ï X* given by (T*i)(x) = £(T(x))
for all £ € Y* and x G X. Some of the basic properties of the adjoint are:
T* € B(Y*,X*), ||T*|| = ||T||, K(T*) = i? (T )x , and K(T) = Æ (T *)X .
well-defined linear continuous bijection with ||T|| = ||T||; see also Problem
166.
Problem 31 poses the question as to whether Cl(I) can be endowed
with a norm so that the natural operations there, i.e., differentiation and
multiplication by t, are both continuous. Simple criteria for continuity are
discussed in Problems 3 3 -3 5 and Problem 39. The existence of bounded
linear extensions of bounded linear mappings is discussed in Problems 4 2 -
44 and Problem 47 considers closed linear extensions.
Compact operators are discussed in Problems 5 3 -7 4 ; Problem 74 is par
ticularly insightful. Projections are considered in Problems 7 5-82 . The role
of category type arguments is highlighted in Problems 8 7 -8 8 , Problem 90,
and Problems 108-109. Sequences of operators are covered in Problems
9 1 -9 2 , Problems 9 4 -9 5 , and Problems 100-101. And, equivalent norms in
Banach spaces are discussed in Problems 116-122.
The case when a bounded linear operator has a continuous inverse is
covered in Problems 131-154 and Problem 173; Problem 139 deals with the
existence of a continuous left-inverse or right-inverse. Applications to the
theory of equations are given in Problems 155-161. Operators with closed
range are considered in Problems 162-164, Problem 168, and Problem 180.
And, the properties of Schauder basis are discussed in Problems 183-190.
Problems
1 < r < p < 00. Given a sequence A, let T be the linear mapping
1 1 . Let
from sequences into sequences given by T(x) = y where yn = Xnxn, n =
1, 2, — Prove that T is bounded from £P into f iff A € £s, 1/ s = 1/ r — 1/p ,
and in that case ||T|| = ||A||S. Can T be a homeomorphism?
12. Let 1 < p < r < 00. Given a sequence A, let T be the linear
mapping from sequences into sequences given by T{x) = y where yn = Xnxn,
n = 1 ,2 , — W hen is: (a) T densely defined in £P? D(T) = £P1 (b) R(T)
a dense subspace of £T1 R(T) = £r? (c) T bounded? (d) T invertible? In
that case compute ||T-1 ||. (e) T bounded and T -1 bounded?
2 8 . Let M : Lq(I) - » Lq(I), 1 < q < oo, be the linear mapping given
by Mx(t ) = tx(t) and suppose that T : Lq(I) —>■ Lq(I) is a bounded linear
operator that commutes with M , i.e., T(Mx) = M(Tx ), x G Lq(I). Prove
that there is a function y such that Tx(t) = y(t)x(t) for all x G Lq(I). W h a t
can one say about yl
2 9 . Let (X,M ,p) be a cr-finite measure space and for 1 < p < oo and
y G L°°(X), let Ty : LP(X) —>• IP{X) be given by Ty(x) = yx. Prove that
if T : IP{X) —> LV{X) is a bounded linear mapping that commutes with Ty
for all y € L°°(X), then T = Tyr for some yr G L°°(X) with 112/ t 11oo = ||T||.
31. Let Dx(t) = x'(t) and Mx{t) = tx(t) denote the derivation and
multiplication operators on C'1( / ) , respectively. Equip C 1( / ) with a norm
so that D and M are bounded with respect to that norm.
3 2 . Let X, Y be normed linear spaces and T : X - > Y a bounded linear
mapping. Prove that r||T|| < supveBx(a. r) ||T(j/)||y for everyx G X and
r > 0.
3 3 . Let X , Y be normed linear spaces and T : X —t Y a linear mapping.
Prove that T is continuous iff xn —> x in X implies T(xn) T{x) in Y.
X , Y be normed linear spaces and T : X —¥ Y a linear mapping.
3 4 . Let
T is bounded iff xn —k x in
Discuss the validity of the following statement:
X implies T(xn) —>■T(x) in Y .
3 5 . Let X, Y be normed linear spaces and T : X —>■ V a bounded linear
operator. Prove that if xn — x in X implies T(xn) —> y in Y , then T{x) = y.
36.Let T : C(I) —> C(I) be a positive linear operator, i.e., x > 0
implies T(x) > 0. Prove: (a) T is continuous and ||T|| = ||T(x/)||. (b) If
T(xi) = Xii and if {xn} C C(I) is such that |a:n(i)l — 1 xn(t) x(t)
for each t G I, then T(xn)(t) -> T(x)(t) for each t G I.
Problems 131
4 0 . Let X i , X 2, X
3 be normed linear spaces and S : X\ —> X 2, T : X 2 —>•
X 3 bounded linear mappings. Prove that TS : X\ —>■X 3 is a bounded linear
operator and ||T'5|| < ||T|| ||5||. Can the inequality be strict?
B , B\ a Banach
4 4 . Let X be a normed linear space with completion
space, and S : X —> B\ a bounded linear mapping. Prove that there is a
unique norm preserving linear extension T : B —¥ B\ of S. Furthermore, if
S is an isometry, so is T .
4 5 . Discuss the validity of the following statement: C 1( / ) = {x € C(I) :
x' € C(I)} endowed with the norm ||x|| = ||x||oo + Hx'Hoo is a Banach space.
B a Banach space. Give an
4 6 . Let X be a normed linear space and
example of: (a) A discontinuous linear mapping T : X -¥ B that has a
closed graph, (b) A discontinuous linear mapping T : B X that has a
closed graph.
6 0 . Given scalar sequences { a n} and {/? „ } such that |an_i| > |an| -> 0
and |/?n-i| > \Pn\ -> 0, let T : i2 —> i2 be given by T (x ) = y where
y = ( « i x i , « 2^2 + /3i®i, <23X3 + 02x2>•••)• Prove that T is compact.
6 1 . Let X be a normed linear space, x$ G X , and L G X * . Prove that
the mapping T : X -»• X given by T (x ) = L (x ) xo is compact.
X , y be normed linear spaces and T : X
6 2 . Let Y a compact linear
operator. Prove that if xn —1 x in X , then T (x n) - » T (x ) in Y.
1 we have ||Tn(x) — T ( x )\\b 1 < £■ (b) Discuss the validity of the following
statement: ||Tn — T|| -> 0 iff Tn(x) —> T(x) in B\ for each x € B.
9 3 . W ith Th given by Th(f)(x) = f(x + h), define Ah : Co(R) ->• Co(M)
by
111 . Give an example of a first category set in 1^(1), 1 < p < oo, which
is not nowhere dense.
118. Let X be a linear space equipped with two norms || • ||i and
|| • H2 such that (X, || • ||1) is a Banach space, and assume that the identity
mapping I : (X, || * ||i) —>■ (X, || • H2) is continuous. Further assume that, if
£ i ( 0 , r ) = {x € X : ||a||i < r } and £ 2( 0, 7-) = {x e X : ||x||2 < r } , there
exists r > 0 such that £ 2( 0,1 ) C £ i ( 0 , r ) + £ 2( 0,1 /2 ) . Prove that the two
norms are equivalent.
1 2 5 . Prove that (C(I ), || • ||p) is not a Banach space, 1 < p < 00.
1 2 6 . Prove the following statements: (a) If z is a sequence such that
Y2nynxn converges for each y G Co, then x G l 1. (b) If {xn} C then
Yjj yjx'j -> 0 for every y € Co iff supn ||zn ||i < 00 and limn xj = 0 for all j.
1 2 7 . Discuss the validity of the following statement: There is a slowest
rate of decay for the terms of an absolutely convergent series; that is, there
exists a sequence a G i1 with an > 0, all n, such that an|xn| < 00 iff
x G £°°.
128. Let X, Y be normed linear spaces and T : X -¥ Y a bounded
linear operator. Prove that the following statements are equivalent: (a)
K(T ) is a finite-dimensional subspace of X and R(T) is closed in Y. (b)
Every bounded sequence { x n} in X with {T(xn)} convergent in Y has a
convergent subsequence.
OO
k=1
INI < 4v l
1 5 9 . Let X be a normed linear space and T : X —> X a compact linear
operator. Prove that, given y G X, the equation x —T(x) = y has a solution
iff L(y) = 0 for every linear functional L e i * which is a solution of the
homogenous equation (I —T)*(L) = 0.
X be a normed linear space and T : X
1 6 0 . Let X a compact linear
operator. Prove thatL —T*(L) = £ is solvable for all l € X* iff £(x) = 0 for
every x e l such that x —T(x) = 0.
Hilbert Spaces
147
148 10. Hilbert Spaces
segment or an arc show that there may exist no y € M which satisfies this
relation, or that there may exist infinitely many such y. In a Hilbert space
M be a nonempty, complete, convex subset
we have the following result: Let
of a Hilbert space H. Then, for every x € X, there exists a unique y € M
such that d(x, M) = ||£ — y||.
Then there is the projection theorem. For x G X, let £-*- = {y € X :
(,x,y) = 0 } and, i f M c I , let M ± = {y € X : y J. x for all x G M } ;
£-*• and M 1- are closed subspaces of X. Now, if H is a Hilbert space and
M a closed subspace of H, every x € i f can be expressed as x = x i + X2 ,
where x\ € M and £2 € M L. Furthermore, the representation is unique and
IMI2 = llx i ||2 + llx 2||2- The mappings P : X M and Q : X —¥ M -*• given
by P(x) = x\ and Q(x) = £2 are linear projections and represent the nearest
points to £ in M and M 1 , respectively. Moreover, ( P(x),y ) = (x,P(y )) for
all £ , y € H. Projections that verify this property are called orthogonal.
That Hilbert spaces are reflexive follows from the Frechet-Riesz repre
sentation theorem which states that, if L is a continuous linear functional
on a Hilbert space H, there exists a unique xl G H with ||£l || = ||L|| such
that L(x) = {x , xl ) for all x € H.
W e say that { £ a }aeA is an orthogonal system (OS) in an inner product
space X if xa -L xp = 0 for all a ^ /3 in A. A n OS is said to be an
orthonormal system (ONS) if ||£a || = 1 for all a e A. Now, if { £ a } is an
ONS, Bessel’s inequality holds, i.e., XlaeA K^)33«)!2 < INI 2 f ° r all x € X.
The (x, xa) are called the Fourier coefficients of x with respect to {£<*} and,
in particular, Bessel’s inequality implies that for each x € X all but at most
countably many of the Fourier coefficients of x with respect to the ONS
{£<*} vanish.
W e say that an O NS {£<*} in a Hilbert space H is maximal, or com
plete, and we call it an orthonormal basis (O N B ), if no nonzero element
can be added to it so that the resulting collection of elements is still an
ONS in i f ; by Zorn’s lemma a maximal ONS in H always exists. For an
ONS {£<*} in a Hilbert space H the following properties are equivalent: (i)
{xa} is maximal in H. (ii) s p {£ a } , i.e., the collection of all finite linear
combinations of the xa, is dense in H. (iii) (Plancherel’s equality) Equality
holds in Bessel’s inequality, i.e., ||£||2 = S a e A £ a )|2 for all £ € i f . (iv)
(Parseval’s equation) For all x,y € i f , (x,y) — S a e A {xixa)(y,ya)-
W e say that a densely defined linear operator T : D(T) c i f —» i f is
symmetric if (T(x),y) = (x,T(y )) for all x,y € D(T). Recall that, given
T € B(H), T* € B{H), the adjoint of T , satisfies (x,T(y)) = (T*(x),y) for
all £ ,y € i f . Furthermore, T* is unique and ||T*|| = ||T||. W e say that an
operator T is self-adjoint if D(T*) = D(T) and T = T*. The condition for
a linear operator to be self-adjoint is stronger than to be symmetric: For a
10. Hilbert Spaces 149
The problems in this chapter deal with the closely related concepts of
inner product and Hilbert spaces; in fact, by Problem 12 the completion of
the former is the latter. Now, closed and bounded subsets of Hilbert spaces
have some interesting properties: by Problems 2 2 -2 3 they do not necessarily
have an element of smallest or largest norm. Also, by Problem 21 there is
a separable Hilbert space such that the cardinality of an O N B and that
of a Hamel basis in the space are different. And, by Problem 33, given a
dense subspace M of a separable Hilbert space, there is an O N B consisting
of elements in M. Problems 5 2 -5 3 prove that an ONS sufficiently close to
an O N B is itself an O NB.
Problems 3 5-38 deal with the Riesz-Frechet representation theorem and
its proof. Along similar lines, Problems 3 8 -4 1 deal with the Hahn-Banach
theorem.
Given a subspace M of a Hilbert space, properties of M 1- are discussed
in Problems 6 0-68 , and applications of this concept are given in Problems
7 0-73 . The notion of projection is explored in Problems 7 5-89 ; Problem 93
considers when a projection is compact.
Problems 9 5 -1 0 7 discuss properties of weak convergence; for instance,
given a 27r-periodic function x € L2([0 , 27r]), if xn(t) = x{nt), n = 1 , 2 , . . . ,
Problem 104 proves that {xn} converges weakly in L 2([0, 27t]) and identifies
its limit.
Hilbert-Schmidt operators are introduced in Problem 122 and isometries
are considered in Problems 124-128. Finite rank operators are discussed in
Problems 129-131. Problem 132 establishes that compact operators are the
uniform limit of finite rank operators; compact operators are considered in
Problems 133-140.
T* of a linear mapping T are given in Problems
Properties of the adjoint
145-148 and Problems 151-153. D(T*), the domain of T*, is characterized
150 10. Hilbert Spaces
in Problem 155 and Problem 154 gives an instance when D(T*) = { 0 } . Sym
metrie operators are covered in Problems 156-161, and bilinear mappings
in Problems 172-175.
Problems
1 1 . Let A be a real sequence with 0 < A*, < 1, all k. On £2 define the
inner product (x,y) i = ^kXkVk- Discuss the validity of the following
statement: X = (£2, (•, -)i) is a Hilbert space.
1 2 . Let X be an inner product space and X the completion of X. Prove
that the inner product on X x X can be extended to X x X, and so X is a
Hilbert space.
L is a continuous
3 5 . Discuss the validity of the following statement: If
linear functional in an inner product space X, there exists xl g X such that
L(x) = (x ,x i ) for all x € X.
3 6 . Let H be a separable Hilbert space and L a bounded linear func
tional on H. Using the fact that H has a countable O N B , give an elementary
proof of the Riesz-Frechet representation theorem. Specifically, prove that
there is a unique x l G H such that ||L|| = ||x l || and L(x) = (x , x l ) for all
x€H.
37. Give a proof of the Riesz-Frechet representation theorem using
elementary properties of kernels of linear functionals.
En xn with xn 6 Hn and ||xn || < An, all n }. Prove: (a) A\t% is compact iff
A G £2. (b) Given a compact K c H, there exist a decomposition %' of H
and such that K c A ^ i .
130. T : H
Let i f be a Hilbert space and H a bounded linear
operator. Prove: (a) T is of finite rank iff T(x) = Ylk=i(x>vk) wk for all
x £ H where Vk,Wk € H. (b) T is of rank n iff T* is of rank n.
131. Let i f be a Hilbert space and T : HH a bounded linear
operator of finite rank. Prove that T is compact. W hen does the identity I
satisfy this property?
l№ )ll2
Pn — sup
x ± { e \ .... en } ,x ^ 0 IMI2 '
71— 1 71
176. Let if T :H
be a separable Hilbert space and H a linear
mapping. Prove that TT* = I (or T*T = I) and (T(x),T(y)} = (x,y) for
all x, y E H iff T ( M ) is a total ONS in H whenever M is a total ONS in H.
Solutions
“DON’T PANIC!”
—Douglas Adams,
“The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy”
Chapter 11
Set Theory
and Metric Spaces
Solutions
3. (a) Let {On} be open dense subsets of O in the induced metric and
put G = p|n On\ we claim that G is dense in O. Let U = X \ O ; since
O, U are open in X, Un = On U U is open in X. W e claim that the Un
are dense in X , i.e., given a nonempty open subset V of X, V fl Un ^ 0.
Now, this is clearly true if V C U. Otherwise V C\0 ^ 0 , and, consequently,
V 0 O ^ 0. Thus, since V n O is open in O , V
fl O fl On ^ 0 , and,
consequently, V
Un ^ 0. Therefore {Un} are open dense subsets of X and
fl
by Problem 1(b), H = P|n Un = G U U is dense in A . If V is a nonempty
169
170 11. Set Theory and Metric Spaces
14. For the sake of argument suppose that each x G Mn is the limit of a
sequence {xk} with Xk & Mn for all k. Let xq G M i and I q an open interval
containing x q . Since xq M \ Mi by the well-ordering of
is a limit point of
the integers there is a least integern\ > 1 such that I q contains a point
x\ G Mni \ M\. Let I\ C 7i C I q be an open interval containing x\ and
select a point X2 G M \ Mni such that X2 G Mn2 and n 2 > n\ is the least
integer for which this happens; next let I2 be an open interval containing
X2 , /2 C /2 C I\ and /2 contains no point of Mni. 12 contains no point of
M i U M 2. Continuing this way one constructs a nested sequence { M D Ik}
where each set is closed and bounded and so the intersection contains a
point which, by the selection process, is not in M n for any n. But, since
M = (Jn M n, this cannot happen.
and, consequently,
1 1 0 1
r" = 3 l T T - 3 ^ = 2 3^> n = I,2, - - •,
and the Cantor discontinuum consists of those x € [0,1] with expansion
x — Y,nxnTn = 2 Yju 3_n Xn where xn = 0 or = 1.
(e) Note that C - C = [ - 1 ,1 ] iff C + C = [0,2]. Indeed, if C + C = [0,2]
and A € [ - 1 ,1 ] , then 1 + A € [0,2] and so 1 + A = c\ + c2 for some c i,c 2 G C.
Then A = c i —(1 —c2) G C —C. Since these steps are reversible the statements
are equivalent. Now, clearly C + C C [0,2]. And, given x G [0,2], x/2 G [0 , 1]
and by (d), x/2 = (y + z)/2 with y,z G C. Thus x — y + z with y, z in C
and so [0,2] c C + C.
174 11. Set Theory and Metric Spaces
f(x\ = i V — =V — -v
/w 2 2k 2k ~~y '
k k
f is onto.
(d) Letx € C have ternary expansion x = ^2nxn/3n\ thus x/Z =
xn/Zn+l. Then by the definition of / ,
/<*/’0 - 5 £n 5 s r - 5 5 n£ £ - 5 /(* ) -
Next, if x € [0,1] \ C, x and x/Z belong to different open intervals and
the conclusion follows as before.
(e) Since / is constant in the open components that comprise the com
plement of the Cantor discontinuum, / ' = 0 there. Next, let x G C. For
each integer n take xn — x ± 2 /3 n where the sign is chosen so that xn G C.
Then
f(xn) ~ / ( a ) = 3n
xn —x 2n+1
and since these quotients increase to oo with n, / is not differentiable at any
X€C.
2 1 . The statement is true. Let / be the Cantor-Lebesgue function on I
extended to be 0 for x < 0 and 1 for x > 1. Let {[o n, 6n]} be an enumeration
Solutions 175
/„ ( * ) = / ( f ^ ) , *€[0,1].
h Mx) =
which implies that g(x) < g(y).
22. Let <p be given by <p(x) = 2 xn/3n. Clearly tp maps X onto C
and is 1-1: If x ^ y and if m is the first place where the ternary expansions
of x and y differ, then
oo 1
\ip(x) - cp(y)\ >
£
n=m+1
23. (a) For the sake of argument suppose that [0,1] = (Jn A » where the
An are pairwise disjoint nonempty closed sets and let On = int(An). Then
X = [0,1] \U n O n = (Jn ( 4 « \ 0 „ ) 7^ 0 is complete with the metric inherited
from [0,1] and, therefore, by the Baire category theorem there exist no and
176 11. Set Theory and Metric Spaces
an open interval J = (a, b), say, such that 0 ^ X fl J C Ano. W e claim that
J fl On = 0 for n ^ no- Let x E X fl J and suppose that y E J D On; with no
loss of generality we may assume that x < y . Then there exists z E An \ On
such that a < x,z < y < b. Now, this implies that z E Xf)J, which in turn
implies that z E Ano but, since An is disjoint from Ano, this cannot happen.
Therefore J C X L) Ono, J = (J n X ) U (J fl O no) C A no, and so J C Ono,
which is not the case since X fl J ± 0.
(b) By the Baire category theorem one of the sets must contain an
interval of positive length and no Cantor set of positive Lebesgue measure
does.
2 7 . For each k let Af. = € X : |/a (®)| < k}; since the f\ are
continuous, Ak is the intersection of closed sets and, hence, closed. Now,
since each x E X belongs to Ak provided that k > M(x), X = |JkAk and
by the Baire category theorem An has nonempty interior for some n, i.e., a
ball B(xo,e) C An for some xq E An and e > 0. Hence |/^(x)| < n for all
AE A and x E B(xo,e) and the conclusion holds for M = n.
a sequence {x\} with between xk and xk+i such that / ( n+1^(xfc) = 0, all k.
Since limfc xk = x it follows that / ( n+1)(x) = lim^ / ( n+1)(x }) = 0. Repeating
this argument with { x } } in place of {xfc} we get that y(n+2)(x) — 0, and so
on.
178 11. Set Theory and Metric Spaces
36. (a) For the sake of argument suppose such an / exists. Then by
Problem 35, C(f) is a Gs subset of [0 , 1], and countable dense at that, but
by Problem 4(c) no such set exists.
(b) and (c) The sets in question are countable and dense. Therefore as
in (a) it readily follows that / does not exist.
Solutions 179
fn(x) = n ( f ( x + ^ -/(x)), « = 1) 2, —
Next, f(x ) = limn fn{x) everywhere. Let x G [0,1]; by definition fn(x) <
f(t)+n\t — x| for all t G [0,1] and, in particular, setting t = x, fn(x) < f(x)
and so limsupn / n(x) < f(x). Next, suppose that f(x) > r, r e I . Since /
is lower semicontinuous at x there exists 8 > 0 such that f(t) > r for all t G
(x-<5, x + < S )n [0 ,1] = J, say. For these values of t, inftej ( f(t)+n\t—x \) > r
and, since |t-x| > «5 for t G [0 ,1]\ J, infte[0,i ] \ j ( /( i ) + n | i - x | ) > - M + n8
where —M is a lower bound for / . Thus / n(x) > r for n sufficiently large and
so lim infn fn(x) > r. Hence, since f(x) > r is arbitrary, lim infn fn{x) >
f(x) and finally, combining these inequalities, limn fn(x) = f(x).
50. Let A = (Jn An where each An is closed and nowhere dense. Given
x € A, mx = m in{n : x G An} is well-defined, and let / : X —> R be given
by
/ 1 /m * , x G A,
№) = 1o, x*A.
(X, r < 0,
Br=\\Jn=\An> l / ( m + l) < r < 1/ ( to),
(0 , r > 1.
55. For the sake of argument suppose that X is countable and let
/ : N -> X be a bijection from N into sequences of 0’s and l ’s. If / ( n ) =
(x * , x £ , . . . ) is the sequence that corresponds to n let y be the sequence with
terms yn = 1 — x£, all n. Then y is a sequence of 0 ’s and l ’s but since
yn 7^ x” for all n, y cannot be any of the sequences in / ( N).
56. The statement is true. Since N and Q fl [0,1] are equivalent we
work with the latter set instead. T is then defined as the set of sequences
of rationals in [0, 1] that converge to the irrationals there, one sequence per
irrational. Since card([0,1] \ Q ) = c, T has the right cardinality. Now, if
A,B € F have infinite intersection, they contain a common subsequence
that must converge to the irrational number determined by both A and B.
But since these numbers are different, the intersection is finite.
A = A U {x }, / 1* = / , Kx) = x'
now clear: having picked Ci,... ,Cn_ i and rjk = {supa d(Ca) : Ca g Ck}
with rji > 2 r)2 > •.. > 2 n~ 1 rjn- i and rjk < r¡/2 k for 1 < k < n, pick
Cn C C \ Ufc=í Ck and T)n = supa{d(Ea) : Ea G Cn} < ??n_ i / 2 < i?/2n.
Observe that C can be written as the countable union of the Cn because,
since r/n —)■ 0 as n —»• oo, if Ea G C, then G Cn the first time that
d(Ea) > r¡n/ 2 . Thus C is the countable union of finite sets and is therefore
countable.
pairwise disjoint open intervals and each such interval contains a distinct
rational number, card(O) < card(QN) = Hq° — c**° = 2N°'H° = 2^° = c.
Thus card(C) < c. On the other hand, for each x > 0, [0, x\ is compact
and so card(C) > c. Also, since each [0, x], x > 0, is uncountable and has
positive Lebesgue measure, the collection of uncountable compact subsets
of R with positive Lebesgue measure has cardinality c.
7 2 . Clearly a = card (ii) < c. Moreover, since the set of linear combina
tions of the elements of a finite set with coefficients in Q is countable but R
is not,a is infinite. For each integer n let An = {x G R : x — hk, qk
rational, hk G H}\ we claim that card(An) = a for all n. Note that listing
the rationals { r i , r 2, . . . } we have A\ = \JnrnH, the union being disjoint,
and since card (rnH) = card (H) for every rn ^ 0, by Problem 64 it fol
lows that card(Ai) = Ho • card(ih) = Ho •a = a. W e proceed now by
induction; we just saw that the statement is true for n = 1. Now, since
An C An+1 C An + Ai, it readily follows that card(An) < card(An+i) <
card(An + A\) < card(An x A\) = card(An) and if card(An) = a, then
card(An+i) = a. Finally, by the definition of Hamel basis, R = (Jn An and
c < card((Jn An) < Ho •a = a. Therefore a = c.
Measures
Solutions
1 . No, let B = X \ A.
2 . Let X = {a,b,c}, A\ = (0 , { a } , { 6, c } , X } , A 2 = { 0 , { 6 } , { a , c } , X } .
Were A\ U A 2 an algebra it would contain {a , 6} = { a } U { 6} , which it
does not. On the other hand, if {An} is an increasing sequence of algebras,
A — Un An is an algebra. First, if A £ A, then A £ A n for some n and
Ac £ An C A. Next, if A , B £ A, then A £ A m. for some m , B £ A n for
some n, and A U B £ A n where N = m ax(m , n).
191
192 12. Measures
Note that the result is not true if X = {x, y}. Then M{V) = {0 , {x, y } }
and M = V(X).
7. No. In the setting of Problem 5(b) letX = K and An = [—n ,n ];
we claim that |Jn Sau is not a cr-algebra of subsets of X. To see this let
Bm = [0,m ]; then Bm c Am and so Bm € SAm C U n ^ n - On the other
hand, [0, oo) = |Jm Bm belongs to any cr-algebra that contains |Jm but
since neither [0, oo) nor [0, oo)c = (—oo, 0) is contained in Am for any m,
[0,oo) i U m £ 4 m-
Now, a simple condition ensures that the union of finitely many cr-
algebras is a cr-algebra: Let M \ ,... , M n be cr-algebras of subsets of X
such that M = (Jfc=i Ad* is an algebra; then M is a cr-algebra. First,
M 7^ 0 and M is closed under complementation. Next, let { A k} C M and
separate the sets into the classes A i = { A k : Ak € M \ ] , A m = {Ak : Ak 6
M m \ U i <e<m^e}> 1 < m < n . Then U A ke A m A k G M m , 1 < m < n, and,
consequently, (Jfe Ak = L £ = i \JAkzAmAk 6 M ‘
8 . S is a cr-algebra of subsets of X iff every point in X is open.
10. First, note that 1Z is also closed under countable intersections;
indeed, if {An} C 1Z, f )nAn = A\ \ (Jn(vli \ An) € 7Z. Next, observe that
1Z' is closed under countable unions. Let {A'n} c TZ', A'n = A^ with An £ TZ
for all n. Then (Jn A'n = ( f)n An)c which, since f ) n An € TZ, is in TZ'. Now,
if {An} c S divides the sequence into two parts, one corresponding to those
sets in TZ, which we still call An, and the other consisting of those sets in
TZ', which we rename A'n, then the union can be expressed as L^An€HAn
U a 7e n > An where the first union is in TZ and the second, as we just proved,
is in TZ'; therefore the union is in 7?. U 7?/ = S. Finally, by the symmetry in
the definition of S, S is closed under complementation.
Now, it is always the case that every measurable A is the disjoint union
of the Bx with x £ A. However, such unions might not be countable and,
even if every Bx is measurable, an arbitrary union of Bx is not necessarily
measurable. For example, let X be uncountable and M consist of all count
able sets and their complements. Then Bx = {a:} for all x £ X and every
subset Y = U y e r of X is the union of a suitable subcollection of the Bx.
1 4 . No. W e claim thatXi contains n pairwise disjoint sets for all n and
so there are countably many pairwise disjoint sets in M - If A € M , A, Ac
are two disjoint sets in M . Now, if A \ , . . . , An are n pairwise disjoint sets in
M , let A = U L i Ak>i f X \ A ¿ ® , then there are n -l-1 pairwise disjoint sets
in M . On the other hand, if A = X, let B = {B £ M : B = Ufceí1Ak w^ r e
F ranges over all nonempty subsets of { 1, . . . , n } } ; since B is finite and A4
infinite there is a nonempty C £ M \ B . Now, we claim that Ak fl C ^ 0
and Ak \ C 7^ 0 for some k, 1 < k < n. For the sake of argument suppose
this is not the case and let I\ = {1 < k < n : Ak n C ^ 0, Ak \ C = 0 } and
1 2 = {f < k < n : Ak O C = Q, Ak \ C ^ ®}. It then readily follows that
C D Ufceii and that Cc D Ufcej2 which by complementation gives
C C (Ufc€i2Ak)° = U keh Ak' and> consequently, C = Ufc6li Ak € B, which
is not the case. Therefore for some index k, which we may assume to be
n, An f] C ^ $ and An \C ^ 0. Therefore A \ , . A n- 1, An D C, An \ C ,
are n + 1 pairwise disjoint sets in M . Hence M. contains countably many
pairwise disjoint sets and by Problem 12 is uncountable.
Because of its simplicity we discuss a second approach. For the sake of
argument suppose that M is a countably infinite a-algebra of subsets of X
and for x G X let Bx be as in Problem 13; since M. is countable Bx is a
countable intersection of measurable sets, hence measurable. From Problem
13 we know that if Bx ^ By, Bx C\By = 0. W e claim that if { B x : x G X }
M is finite. Indeed, note that the definition of Bx implies that if
is finite,
x € X and A £ Xi, then Bx c A or Bx c X \ A. It thus follows that every
element of M. is the union (in fact, pairwise disjoint) of some subcollection
of {Bx : x £ X}. So, card({Ha; : x £ X } ) = n < 00, which implies that
card(AI) < 2n and this is not the case. Hence {Bx : x £ X } must be infinite
and since the Bx are pairwise disjoint, M. is uncountable.
Now, sinceA'n = (A'n \ (U fc/ n A'k)) U {A'n n ( U ^ „ A'k)) i<; readily follows
that A'n n V = {A'n \ (U k^nA'k) n V) u (A>n n (Ufe^n^fc) n v ) where 35
noted above the second set in the union is empty. Therefore, if An = A!n \
({Jkjin A'k)i Anr\V = A'n n v and, similarly, if Bn = B'n \ ( U kfnB'k),
Bn DV = B'n nV. Finally, {An} and {Bn} consist of pairwise disjoint sets
and Mn = (An fl V) U (Bn fl Vc) for all n.
2 3 . Necessity first. Let x G R and for the sake of argument suppose that
/ (x) = f(x i) for some x\ ± x. Then { x } £ / _ 1( { / ( x ) } ) and { x } <£ M f ,
which is not the case. Hence / is injective.
Sufficiency next. Since / is injective, { x } = / _ 1( { / ( x ) } ) and since the
singleton { / ( x ) } is a Borel set in R, { x } G M f .
2 6 . First, { ( x ,y ) € R 2 :
x — y = A} is a line with slope 1 shifted by —A
B € B(R), F~ 1 (B) = { ( x ,y ) G R 2 : x — y € B}
in the (x ,y ) plane. Thus, if
consists of lines with slope 1 and every possible shift from the set —B. In
other words, M f consists of all 45-degree diagonal stripes in R 2 with base
- B G B(R ).
2 8 . Let Ei = A\ and for n > 1 put En = An \ Ufc<n note that
En C An and U n Bn = 1JnAn. Then, by monotonicity, n(En) < n{An) and
since the En are pairwise disjoint, y,(\Jn An) = /x(|Jn En) = J2nv{En) <
41. (a) Observe that once we prove that /Uj(M) + ¡ie(Mc) = /i(X)
for M c X , the original question follows by setting X = A U E. Now,
given e > 0, let A D M c be such that ¡jl{A) < ¡j,e(Mc) + e; then Ac c M
and n{X) < ne(Mc) + ji(Ac) + e. And, since n{Ac) < m(M), it follows
that n{X) < ¡j,e(Mc) + + e, which gives one inequality since e is
arbitrary. Conversely, let A C M, A G S. Then Mc C Ac and so fi(X) =
[¿(A) + fr(Ac) > fi(A) + /xe( M c). Therefore, taking the sup over these A it
follows that n(X) > /ij(M ) + which is the other inequality.
(b) Since the Ak are pairwise disjoint and IJitLi Ak C IJfcLi Mk it follows
that £ * L i M 4 k ) < M kAk) < ^k) for each fixed K\ therefore,
taking the sup we get EfcLi fH(Mk) < jtx*(Ufc M fc) and since K is arbitrary
one inequality holds. Conversely, pick A G S such that A C \JkMk and
H(A) — MidJfe Af/c) — e; since the Ak are pairwise disjoint and A C IJ^. Mk,
A n Ak C Mk for all k. Thus ^¿(Ufc Mk) < /jl(A) + e = Efc H Ak) + e,
and since M D Ak c Mk, Hi([JkMk) < Efc Hi(Mk) + e, which, since e is
arbitrary, gives the desired inequality.
Solutions 199
The proof for ¡xe follows along similar lines. Given e > 0, let Ak D
Mk, n(A!k) < ¡JLe{Mk) + e/2k. Then \JkMk c {JkA'k and /ze( \jkMk) <
M ( U A'k) < < E k^ ( M k)+e. Let A d \JkMk, /j,(A)<fj,e(\JkMk)
+ e . Then A fl l j fc Ak contains Mk for all k and since the Ak are pairwise
disjoint, A n Ak D Mk. Thus J2k¡Xi{Mk) < Efe H Ak) < /x(A) <
Me(UkMk) +£•
{Mk} be pairwise disjoint sets in A4(S, V). Then by Problem
4 2 . Let
18, Mk = (Ak fl P ) U (Bk D P c) where each of the sequences {Afc} and
{B k} consist of pairwise disjoint sets in S. Thus Mk D P = Ak fl P and
^(U kMk) = ^i(Ufc(Mfcn V )) = M U k(Ak n P )). Now, since Ak (1 V C
Ak and the Ak are pairwise disjoint, by Problem 41, ¡Xi(\Jk(Ak n P )) =
Efe Ai(Ak fl P ) = Efe Ai(Mk fl P ) = Efe v*{Mk) and we have finished. The
proof for v* is analogous.
U (n —m)\
»(An) = l+ Y ,( - l) m
m=1
m n! 1+I>
771=1 771=0
n n
Finally, [¿1 is the only complete measure on <S such that [¿i \m = M- Since
for M G A4, M = M U 0, [¿1 (M) = [¿(M) and [¿1 extends [¿. To check that
[¿i is complete let A = M U B G S with [¿i(A) — [¿(M) = 0, B C N € Af,
and Ai C A. Then Bi = ( M f l A i ) U ( B n A i ) C M U JV with [¿(MU N) = 0
and A i = 0 U Bi G 5 has [¿i(A{) = 0. Thus /Lix is complete.
Suppose that [¿2 is another complete extension of ju toS and note that for
B c N e A f , [¿2 (B) < [¿2 (N) = /¿(N) = 0. Thus, if A = MuB G S, [¿2 (A) <
[¿2 (M) + [¿2 (B) = [¿(M) = [¿i(A). Moreover, since for B G V(Af) also
[¿i(B) = 0, we can reverse the roles of ¡¿1 and [¿2 and obtain [¿i(A) < [¿2 (A)
as well. In other words, [¿i(A) = [¿2 (A) for every A G S and uniqueness
follows.
Finally, /4 is cr-finite iff [¿1 is cr-finite. Since AA C S and [¿i \m = M>
sufficiency is clear. As for necessity, let X = |Jn X n where the X n are
pairwise disjoint and [¿(Xn) < 00 for all n. Let B = -A\(Jn X n\clearly B G S
and [¿i (B) = 0 for otherwise B would contain a set M G AA with [¿(M) > 0
disjoint from all the X n, which is not possible. Then with X[ = Xi U B
and X'n = X n for all n > 2, {X^} is a pairwise disjoint partition of X with
[¿i(X'n) < 00 for all n.
A = ((AuN)\N)U(Ai~\N) where (A U N) \N G AA
5 5 . (a) Note that
and, since AD N C N, Af] N € A4 with [¿(A fl N) = 0.
(b) Since A i) B = A \ ( A \ B) where A e AA and (A \ B) C AAB
has measure 0, A n B G AA. Now, B \ A C AAB has measure 0 and so
B = ( A f l 5 ) U ( 5 \ A ) is measurable. Moreover, [¿(B) < [¿(AnB)+p(B\A) <
[¿(A) and since B G AA, exchanging A and B also [¿(A) < [¿(B).
5 6 . (a) Let A = Ai U N where Ai G AA and N C A 2 , A2 € AA with
[¿(A2 ) = 0. Thus Ai C A C Ai U A 2 and [¿i(A) > ¡¿*(A) > [¿(Ai) —
[¿(Ai U A 2 ) > [¿*(A) > [¿i(A). Hence [¿*(A) = [¿i(A) = [¿*(A).
202 12. Measures
A '(i4 n X n) for all A and n. Hence A(A) = J2n A (> ln X n) = Y/,n A '( A n X n) =
A'(^4) and A is unique.
6 3 . Let fi(A) > 0; then v(A) > 0 or A(A) > 0. Suppose that v(A) > 0;
then there is a ¿'-atom B such that B c A. If A (B) = 0, B is clearly an atom
for ¡j,. On the other hand, if A(B) > 0, there exists a A-atom C such that
C C B; of course fi(C) > 0 . If C is a /¿-atom we are done. Otherwise, by
Problem 62(a) there exists D G M such that fx(C fl D) > 0 or fi(C\D ) > 0
and in that case C fl D or C \ D is the required atom for fi.
6 4 . Let S denote the family of all countable unions of /¿-atoms and for
A 6 M let fii(A) = su p {/i(A fl M) : M G <S} and /¿2(A ) = su p {/t(A fl N) :
fii(N) = 0 }; then ¡i = /¿1 + /¿2. First, /¿1 is purely atomic. Let A € M .
204 12. Measures
If H\(A) > 0, then pb(A fl M) > 0 for some M € S and since M = (Jn Mn
where the Mn are /x-atoms, ¡i{A D Mn) > 0 for some /x-atom Mn. Since
A fl Mn is a /x-atom such that »\(A n Mn) > 0 and since /xi < /x, A fl Mn is
a /xi-atom contained in A. Next, /X2 is nonatomic. Suppose that » 2 (A) > 0.
Then ¡jl(A D N) > 0 for some N such that »i(N) = 0. Now, A fl N is not
a /x-atom for otherwise »i(A n N) > 0 . Thus, since /x(A fl N) > 0 and
A fl N is not a /x-atom there exists B € M such that ¡i(A fl N fl B) > 0 and
li((AnN) \B) > 0. Now, necessarily fj,2 (Ar\B) > 0 and fi2 (A\B) > 0 and,
by Problem 62(a), /X2 has no atoms.
Observe that if /x is atomic and »(A) > 0, there exist countably many
atoms {Mn} such that ¡¿(A) = /x(A fl |Jn Mn). Letting
An — (Mn \ (M i U . . . U M n_ i ) ) D A
and disregarding those ^71 > if any, of measure zero, we have the following:
If /x is purely atomic and »(A) > 0, there exist countably many pairwise
disjoint atoms An C A such that »(A) = /x((Jn An).
66 . Let {rn} be a sequence that decreases to 0. Since p|n ATn c Plr>o
it follows thatA = p|rn ATjl and so, A G M . Hence by continuity from above
pi(A) = limn /x(j4rn) and since { r n} is arbitrary, limr_M) l^(Ar) = n(A).
68 . The statement is true. Necessity first. For the sake of argu
ment suppose that there exist two indices, which we assume to be 1, 2,
such that /j,(Ai fl A 2 ) > 0. Then ix(A\ U A 2 ) < /x(-Ai) + / x ^ ) and so
/x(Ai U A2) + 3 M A ») < £ n Ai(^n) = li{{Ai U A2) U Un =3 An) <
fi{A\ U A2 ) + /x(U “ =3 An). Thus canceling the finite quantity ii{A\ U A 2 )
we get the strict inequality £ ^ L 3 n(An) < /x(U ^=3 ^ n ), which by the <7-
subadditivity of /x cannot hold.
Sufficiency next. W e begin by constructing sequences {Bn} ) {Cn} as
follows. Let B\ = 0 and Bn = An D (Um=\ A n ) for n > 1, and C\ = A\
and Cn = An \ (Jm=i A n for n > 1; then An = Bn U Cn for all n > 1.
Moreover, Cn D Cm = 0 for n ± m and since Bn = U m = \ ( A H Am),
»(Bn) — £ m= i »(An n A n ) = 0 for all n and, hence, also »(An) = »(Cn)
for all n > 1. Finally, we claim that |Jn Cn — (Jn An; it suffices to prove that
(JnAn C (jnCn, the other inclusion being obvious. Now, if x € U n A i , let
m be the smallest index such that x G Am; then x € Cm C (Jn Cn- Hence
M(Un -A i) = » ( ( J n ^ n ) = EnM(Cn) = E n M A A
7 0 . Let S = { B e B (R n) : inner and outer regularity hold for B}\ we
claim that S is a cr-algebra that contains the open sets and so <S = H(Rn).
Also, if O is open, O =
Now, outer regularity holds for open sets.
Qk are nonoverlapping closed cubes; let Kn = |Jfe=i Qk-
Ufc Qk where the
Then {Kn} is an increasing sequence of compact sets with O = (JnKn
Solutions 205
and, therefore, by continuity from below /x(O) = lim n/j.(Kn). Thus inner
regularity also holds for O and S contains the open sets.
Next, we claim that S is closed under complementation; clearly it con
tains R n and 0. Let A be outer regular and given e > 0, let B D A be an
open set such that fi(A) > fi(B) — e /2 ; then C = Bc C Ac is closed and
l¿(Ac) = fx(Rn) -/¿(A) < /j,(Rn) — ¡jl(B) + e/2 = /j ,( C ) + e/2. Let {Kn} be an
increasing sequence of compact sets such that C = (JnKn- Since n is finite,
n(C) = limn V>{Kn) and so picking n large enough we have Kn C C C Ac
such that ¡J,(C) < /n(Kn) + e /2 . Hence n(Ac) < /J,(Kn) + e and Ac is inner
regular. The fact that if A is inner regular, Ac is outer regular, follows along
similar yet simpler lines. Hence S is closed under complementation.
Finally, let {An} c S and A = |Jn An', we claim that A € S. Given
e > 0, let Cn be a compact set and Bn an open set such that Cn C An C Bn
and ¡i{Bn \ Cn) < e /2 n+1. Let C = U n Cn, B = |JnBn\then C C A C B
and since B \ C C IJn(Bn \ Cn), l¿(B \ C) < Y,nli(Bn \ Cn) < e/ 2 and,
consequently, /j,(B\A) < [i(B\C) < e/ 2 and A is outer regular. Next, since
C is not necessarily compact, let Kn = |Jm=i Cm, {Kn} is an increasing
sequence of compact sets and so lim n/j,(Kn) = /¿(C); pick N large enough
so that n(C \ K n ) < e/2. Then K n is compact, K n C A C B, and
/j,(B \ K n ) = fi(B \C) + n(C \ K n ) < £ and, consequently, [i(A \ K n ) <
fj,(B\KN) < £ and A is inner regular. Thus S is a a-algebra and S = B(Rn).
In general inner regularity holds for Borel measures that assign a finite
measure to compact sets but the same is not true for outer regularity. Con
sider the Borel measure v given by v{B) = card(£? f l Q n), B 6 B (R n); since
Mn = U<jeQn u (Qn)c) where v(q U (Q n)c) = 1 for each q, v is <r-finite.
Note that if B = { 0 } , then u(B) = 1. Now, any open set O that contains
B must contain an infinite number of rationals and so v(O) = oo. Thus
1 = v{B) < in f {i/(0 ) : O is open and B c 0 } = oo.
72. For the sake of argument suppose that tp is not cr-additive. Then
by Problem 31 there is a decreasing sequence {An} of Borel sets with empty
intersection such that limntp(An) = infn ip(An) = rj > 0. Pick now for
each n a compact set Kn c An such that ip(An) < ip(Kn) + r¡/2n+1;
then ip(An \ f|m=i Km) < £ m = i ip(Am \ Km) < r¡/2 . Then, in particular,
^ (flm = i Km) ^ o and, consequently, f|m=i Km + 0- Finally, {f| m = i K™} is
a decreasing sequence of nonempty compact subsets in the compact space
K\ and, consequently, P)m Km ^ 0, which is not the case since f ] m Am = 0.
7 3 . (a) For the sake of argument suppose that for some r¡ > 0 all open
cubes of sidelength less than rj have finite measure. Now, since K is compact,
K can be covered by finitely many open cubes Q i,. ■■,Q n , say, of sidelength
less than rj and, therefore, by subadditivity n(K) < Y/k=i M Qk) < o°> which
is not the case.
206 12. Measures
lim sup ¿¿(lim inf (An n A%)) < ¿¿(lim sup lim inf (An fl A%)) = 0,
7i k n k
210 12. Measures
and, consequently, //(f|m=n A™) > /¿(A „) - Em=n _1 ^{Am\Am+1); thus let
ting к ^ oo we get //( A n) < n(f]m=n A™) + \ Am+1). Hence,
since f)m=n Am C lim infn An and limп Е т = п М А т г \A m+1) = 0, it fol
lows that limsupn //( A n) < //(lim in fn An). Therefore, by Problem 85(b),
//(lim supn An) < lim infn //( A n) < //(lim infn An) and the equality holds.
The same conclusion does not follow for only 9 sets. Consider Lebesgue
measure on [0, 1] and Ai = [0 ,1 /3 ], A 2 = [ 1 /3 ,2 /3 ], A 3 = [ 2 /3 , 1] ,A 4 =
[0 ,1 /6 ]U [ 1 /3 ,1 /2 ] , A5 = [1 /3 , l /2 ] U [ 5 /6 , 1] ,A 6 = [ 1 /6 ,1 /3 ] U [ 2 /3 ,5 /6 ] , A 7 =
[0 ,1/6] U [ 1 /2 ,2 /3 ] , = [1 /6 ,1 /3 ] U [ 5 /6 ,1], and Ag = [1 /3 ,1 /2 ] U [ 2 /3 ,5 /6 ] .
Then \An\= 1 /3 for 1 < n < 9 and |A| = 0.
9 3 . (a) Let A be a finite set with an even number of elements and A the
collection of all subsets of A that contain an even number of elements. Then
A is a A-system and a monotone class, but not an algebra or a 7r-system.
212 12. Measures
95. Assume first that /¿, v are finite measures and ¿¿(X) = v(X). Let
V = {A G M { X ) : n(A) = u{A)}-, we verify that V is a A-system and
since 7 c P implies M . { F ) c T>, then n = v. First, /x (X ) = v{X) and
X G V . Next, if A, B G V and A C B, then n{B \ A) = ¡j,{B) - n(A) =
v(B) — v{A) = v{B \ A ) and so B \ A G V . Finally, if { A n} c T> are
pairwise disjoint, then fj,(An) = u(An) for all n and so with A = \JnAn,
fi(A) = limAf ^2 ^ = 1 n(An) = l i m j v E j U K A » ) = V{A). The proof for the
case when the measures are cr-finite relative to T follows as in Problem 40.
This condition is necessary. Indeed, consider the counting measure on
the integers and the Lebesgue measure which coincide on the 7r-system in R
consisting of sets of the form (—oo,a;], x G R, which generate B (R ).
Solutions 213
102. For the sake of argument suppose there exist r] > 0 and a subse
quence n/j —> oo such that Onk > r) for all n*,, and for each nk pick an interval
[ik/nk, (ik + 1)/nk\, 0 < i k < n k - l , such that fJ,([ik/nk, (ik + 1)/nk]) > rj.
Now, since I is compact a subsequence of {ik/nk} converges to some x G I.
Using the same notation for the subsequence, since the intervals [ik/n k,
(ik+ l)/n k] shrink to x, by Problem 85(a), n({x}) = ¡i{C\k[ik/n k, (ik+ l)/n k\)
> r), which is not possible since fi has no atoms.
M = X. Let Bn = A n n A £ + 1 , B = limsupn Bn,
1 0 4 . First, assume that
and A = lim supn An\we claim that (lim infn An)c c B U Ac. Indeed, since
(lim infn An)c C ( A n (lim infn An)c) U Ac and (lim infn An)c = limsupn A^
it suffices to prove that C = (lim supn An) n (lim supn A^) c B. Let then
x G C. If x G An> since x G limsupn A £ there exists a smallest integer
214 12. Measures
k k
lim n exp ( - /t ( ;4 n)) = lira exp ^ 2 tx(Anf) = 0 .
Solutions 215
1 for all n, /¿(A£) > 0 for all n, and therefore the first factor above has
k > 1 and,
positive measure, which implies that the second factor is 0 for all
consequently, /¿(lim infn A £) = /¿(U rn fl n=mAn) < J2mK(XLm An) = 0.
Therefore /¿(limsupn A n) = 1 — /¿(lim infn A^) = 1.
' 0, x < 0,
F(x) = V>((-oo, re]) a v^°° 0—k _ o—n l/(n + 1) < x < 1/n,
< 2^k=n+ 1 z ~ z ’
u 1 < X.
1 1 9 . By Problem 64, /j,p = ¡i\ + /¿2 where /¿1 is nonatomic and fi2 is
atomic and by Problem 40 it suffices to identify m i >M2 on intervals of the form
(o, 6]. There are three cases, namely, a > 0, b < 0, and a < 0 < b. In the first
case, with [x] = integer part of x, /x((a, 6]) = F(b)—F(a) = 6+[6] —(a + [a ]) =
(6—a)+[6] — [a]. Similarly, in the second case, /x((a, 6]) = F(b)—F(a) = b—a.
Finally, in the third case, /i((a , £>]) = F(b) — F(a) = b — a + [6]. Thus in
every case n((a, 6]) = |(a, 6] |+ number of positive integers in (a, 6]. Whence
Mf = M i + M2 where m 1 is the Lebesgue measure on B(R) and m2 is the
counting measure of the positive integers.
Solutions 217
and so the sequence has to be finite while, on the other hand, if the sequence
is infinite, Yln f { xn) > Y n V = 00 and the SXn cannot have bounded over
laps.
First, necessity. For the sake of argument suppose that <p is continuous
at x and (p(x) = y > 0; then there exists S > 0 such that <p(y) > t]/2 for all
y G B(x, S). Let {xn} be any points with \x —xn\= 5/2 for all n. Then the
SXn intersect in exactly 2 points, contrary to the above observation.
<p is discontinuous at x, <p(x) > 0. Indeed,
Conversely, we claim that if
there exist e > 0 and xn G B(x, 1 /n ) with <p(xn) > e, n = 1 , 2 , — Now,
218 12. Measures
by Problem 85(b), /x(limsupn SXn) > £■ Next, we claim that limsupn SXn
C Sx. Indeed, if y G limsupn there exists {xnk} such that y e f]kSXnk
and each one of them satisfies |y —xnk\= 1; hence
and so y G Sx. Consequently, <p(x) > ^(lim supn SXn) > £ and we have
finished.
125. Recall that by one of the characterizations of semicontinuity, a
function / on Rn is lower semicontinuous if { / > A} is open for all real A
and upper semicontinuous if { / < A} is open for all real A.
Now, for n = 1, let 8 be the Dirac measure at 0 and take O = (0 ,1 ).
Then
a; e ( —1 ,0 ),
x <£ ( - 1 , 0 ) ,
is not upper semicontinuous and so not continuous.
Nevertheless, we claim that <p is lower semicontinuous. Let A £ R and
suppose that ip(x) > A. Now, by inner regularity there is a compact K C
x + O with p(K) > A. Since Rn \ ( o ;+ 0 ) is closed and RTn(Rn \ ( a :+ 0 ) ) = 0,
there is e > 0 such that \y — z\ > e for all y € K and z G Mn \ (x + O ).
Now, suppose that y G Mn and \x —y\ < e. Then also K C y + O and so
<p(y) > K K ) > A. Thus {<p > A} is open and <p is lower semicontinuous.
A similar argument gives that for a closed set C the function tp(x) =
y(x + C ) is upper semicontinuous.
Note that in particular, if ¡j, is a Borel measure on Rn that is finite
on bounded sets, since the open ball B(x,r ) = x + 5 ( 0 , r ), by the above
argument it follows that ¡i{B{x, r)) is lower semicontinuous as a function of
x for each r > 0.
126. SinceDk(x) = lim(5_M3+ (sup0<r<5 r~ky,(B(x, r ))) is the limit of an
increasing function of 8 it readily follows that limsupr_ ,0+ r~ky(B(x,r)) =
infj>i(supo< r< ]yj r~kn(B(x, r))) and, therefore, sup0<r<1/i r~ky(B(x, r)) is
a Borel measurable function of x for each j = 1 , 2 , . . . , and so is the inf of
these functions.
Let f(x) = limr-^oGri®) where Gr(x) = supQ<p<rp~kfj,(B(x,p)). By
Problem 125, for each p the function p~kp(B(x, p)) is a lower semicontinuous
function of x, and since the sup of a family of lower semicontinuous functions
is lower semicontinuous, GT is lower semicontinuous and Borel measurable.
Now, since f(x) = limn Gi/n(x), f is the limit of Borel measurable functions
and, hence, Borel measurable.
A n analogous result with a similar proof holds for lower ^-densities de
fined with lim inf instead of lim sup above.
Solutions 219
Lebesgue Measure
Solutions
221
222 13. Lebesgue Measure
5. Necessity first. For the sake of argument suppose that for each k> 1
Ak € £ ( K n), Ak C B, with |B \ Ak\e < 1/k. Let A = (JfeA *. Then
there is
|B\ A\e < \B \ Ak\e < 1/k for all k and, therefore, |B \ A|e = 0. Thus
B = (B \ A) U A is the union of a measurable set and a set of measure 0 and
so B e £ ( R n), which is not the case.
Sufficiency next. For the sake of argument suppose that B € £ ( R n).
Then, by the inner regularity of the Lebesgue measure, given e > 0, there is
a closed F c B such that \B \ F| < e, which is not the case.
\A\e < oo and let O be an
7 . For the sake of argument suppose that
open set of finite measure containingA. Then F = Mn \ O is a closed set
with |F| = oo and contains a compact subset K of positive measure. Now,
since FC\A = (l), Kr\A = ® and this cannot happen.
A similar argument gives that if a subset A of a bounded interval J in
Rn intersects every compact subset of J of positive measure, then \A\e = \J\.
8 . Yes. Let C denote the family of compact subsets of [0,1] of positive
measure; by Problem 1.70, with ii the first uncountable ordinal, C = {Ka :
a < f l } . Let { x ° } be a sequence in K q and, having picked sequences {xn}
in Ar/?\|J5</ ? { 4 } f ° r /5 < < il, let {x%} be a sequence in A Q.\ U /3<a{ 4 } ;
this choice is always possible since Ka is uncountable and {Jp<a{xn}, the
countable union of countable sets, is countable. Now, let Bn = { x “ : a < f l } ;
the Bn are pairwise disjoint and since each Bn meets every compact subset
of [0,1] of positive measure, by Problem 7, |Bn D (0, l)|e = 1. Finally, no Bn
can be measurable because if it were, by the inner regularity of the Lebesgue
measure we would have \Bn\= sup{|A| : K compact, K C Bn} = 0 (since
Bn only contains countable compact subsets) but, as noted above, \Bn\e = 1.
10. By the definition of Lebesgue measure, given e > 0, there are
intervals {Ik} such that A c \Jkh and v(h) < |A| + e /2 . Let {I'k}
denote open intervals such that Ik C I'k and |/(.| = |ifc| + e2~(fc+1). Now,
since A is compact there are finitely many open intervals I 'n i, . . . , I'n , say,
Solutions 223
and similarly for A n (liminffc Ak)c. Thus |AA(lim inf/. Ak)\ < |B| = 0.
1 9 . First, since {|>lfc|e} is an increasing numerical sequence it has a limit
and by monotonicity lim*. \Ak\e < l U ^ l e -
To prove the opposite inequality consider G$ sets {Gk} such that Ak c
Gk and \Ak\e = |GkI for all k. Now, by Problem 2.85(a), |liminf*. Gk\
< liminf*; |Gfc|, and, since {Ak} converges to A = (Jfc Ak, lim inf* Ak = A.
Hence \A\e = |liminf*, Ak\e < |lim inf* Gk\ < lim inf* \Gk\= lim in f* \Ak\e
= fimfc |A*|e.
21. (a) The example in Problem 8 works. Also the Vk in Problem
1 are pairwise disjoint and their union is contained in [0 ,2 ), which gives
I U k v k\e < 2, and since |Vfc|e = |V|e > 0 for all k, |V*|e = oo.
(b) Let Ak = Then A\ D A 2 D . . . , |Ai|e < 2, and since
(1 kAk = <b,\ f \ Afcle = 0. Yet |A*|e > |Vfc|e = IV|e > 0 for all k.
23. ¡i{x + (a, 6]) = /x((a,5]) for every x € R.
First, we claim that
Let {dn} be a sequence in D that increases to x. Then (a + dn,b + x] =
Solutions 225
where the intervals appearing are pairwise disjoint and so ¿i((0, x]) = c n +
c (x — n) = c x . Finally, suppose that (x, y\ is a left-hand open interval in
R; then, since ( x , y\ = x + ( 0 , y —x], n((x, y]) = c(y —x) and this is all we
need to know about intervals.
Now, since T = {(a , 6] : a, b G R } is a 7r-system of subsets of R, by
Problem 2.95 the measures coincide on M (F) = B(R ).
2 9 . (a) M { A ) = 7>(Q).
(b) X = (a, 6] fl <Q> and put /¿([a, 6]) = b — a.
The statement is false. Let
Clearly fi extends additively and = 0 for every rational q £ (a, 6].
However, since X = U„e<rw„ m M > if u were a measure on V(X) it would
follow that fx(X) = , b\) = b - a ^ Yqex M M ) = 0.
3 0 . The statement is false if A is unbounded. Consider
A = N in R; then
|A| =0 and |Ofc| = oo for all k > 2 . And for n > 2 consider A = { 0 } x Rn_1,
which is unbounded and closed in R n; then \A\ = 0 and \Ok\ = oo for k > 1.
On the other hand, A = (~)kOk if A is bounded. Clearly A C
For the sake of argument suppose there is x G Ok \ A c Ac; since Ac is
open there exists a ball B(x , r) C Ac and so d(x, A) > r. Now pick k > 1/ r ;
then, by assumption x £ Ok and d(x,A) < l/k < r, which cannot happen.
Therefore A = f j fc Ok and, since A is bounded, {Ok} is a decreasing sequence
of bounded sets, and by continuity from above |A| = lim* |Ofc|.
(x + 0) \ 0 C ((x U
V\
+
fc=i / /
u ( x +
V
U
k=N-n
N / °o
c U « * + Qk) \ Qk) U I X + (J Qk
k=1 V k=N+1
and, therefore, |(x + O) \ 0 \< |UfcLi((® + Qk) \Qk) I + r]. So it suffices to
prove that lim|x|_>o |(z + <2 ) W I = 0 for every bounded closed cube Q , which
is a straightforward verification.
3 8 . W e may assume that A is bounded. Then, by Problem 37, |A| ~
\A fi {A + h)| for sufficiently small h and so, repeating this argument n — 1
times, A n ( H i 4 ) n . . . n ( ( n - 1)h + A) has positive finite measure ~ |A| for
h sufficiently small and, in particular, the intersection is not empty. So, for
some s : 6 l , there are a i , . . . , an G A such that x = a i, x = 02 + h, . . . , x =
an+(n-l)h, and, consequently, x, x - h , . . . , x - ( n - l ) h € A. The conclusion
clearly holds for a = x - (n - l)h, . . . , a + (n - l)h = x, since they all belong
to A.
3 9 . Both statements are true and we prove (b). W e may assume that
A is bounded. First, as in Problem 37, for h > 0 small enough |>1| ~
|(An((h, 0)+^4))fl((0, h)+A)n((h, h)+A)| and, in particular, the intersection
is not empty. If x is in that set there are 01, 02, 03,04 G A such that x =
ai,a: = (h,0) + 02.a: = ( 0,h) + 03,® = (h,h) + 04, and so, x,x — (h,0),
x — (0, h),x — (h,h) all belong to A for h sufficiently small and are the
vertices of a square of sidelength h.
and so, given e > 0, there exists K such that Y^k=K \Qk\ < e /3 . Write
O = U t i 1 Qk U Ufelii Qk = Ok U Rk , say, where \RK\< e /3 . Then
and, consequently, |(x +0)nO| < \{x + Ok )F\Ok \+ + |£ + #fc| + |.Rfc| <
|(x + Ok ) n Ok \+ £• Thus it suffices to prove the result for finite unions of
closed cubes. But then (x + Ok ) n Ok = U k,7=i(x + Qk) H Qe and we are
reduced to proving the result for A = (x + Q) fl Q' where Q, Q' are closed
cubes in Rn. In this case the result is obvious since the intersection is empty
for |x| sufficiently large.
invariant and so by the W 1 version of Problem 23, |T(A)| = n(Â) = r}\A\ for
some 77 > 0.
It only remains to prove that 77 = d e t(M ). First, if T is not invertible,
i.e., d e t(M ) = 0, T (R n) is contained in a hyperplane and so, by Problem
27, T(A) has measure zero for all A E £ (M n) and the conclusion holds with
77 = 0.
Next, if T is invertible, by linear algebra M is the product of elementary
matrices, i.e., square matrices that implement one of three elementary row
operations via left multiplication. These matrices are given below: Mj
multiplies a row of a matrix by a nonzero number, Mu interchanges rows,
and Mui adds a row to another. They are:
c 0 O' 0 1 o'
0 1 0 1 0 . .. 0
, Mn = î
_0 0 .. . 1 0 0 .. . 1
and
1 1 0
0 1 0
Mm =
0 0 . . . 1
5 1 . Rather than using measure theory, one could invoke the Baire cate
gory theorem since as is readily seen hyperplanes are closed nowhere dense
subsets of Rn.
52. \£\ = un |det (A ) |- 1 / 2 where un denotes the volume of the unit ball
in Rn.
5 5 . First assume that 0 <\A\e < 00. For the sake of argument suppose
that for some 0 < 77 < 1, \A fl Q\e < y\Q\ for all cubes Q in R n. Then,
given e = ( I /77 — 1) |j4Ie > 0, there is a covering of A by intervals {/* .}
such that Ylk 1-ffcl ^ |j4|e + £• Now, the interior of each Ik is open and,
therefore, Ik = Nk U l j m where the l are nonoverlapping closed cubes
and \Nk\ = 0 for all k. Hence A c (JfcIVfc U (Jfc mQm and, consequently,
\A \e < Em,k \A n Qmle < V'Em* l<2ml = VEk\h\ < V(\A \e + e) = V\A \e +
77( 1/77 — l)|A|e = \A\e, which cannot happen. If \A\e = 00, let Am = A fl
B ( 0, 7n); then A\ C A 2 C . . . and A = U m Am- Now, limm |^4m|e = \A\e
and so \Am\e > 0 for 7n sufficiently large. Since \Am\e < 00 by the first part
of the argument the assertion is true for Am and, consequently, for any set
that contains it, including A.
Q can be expressed as a finite union of nonoverlapping
Finally, since
subcubes {Qfe} obtained by subdividing Q, the conclusion must hold for one
of the Qk as well for, if not, |A n Q\e < ¿ fe \A n Qk \e < v E k \Qk\ = v\Ql
which is not the case. Thus Q may be assumed to have arbitrarily small
measure.
\ACfl Q\ < (1 — 77) \Q\ for all cubes Q and so by Problem 55,
it follows that
\AC\ = 0. Also observe that if A c Qi satisfies \A fl <51 > b\Q\ whenever
Q C Qu then \A\ = |Qx|.
Next, let 7i = 1, I = [0,1], and B the Lebesgue nonmeasurable subset
of I with \B\e = 1 constructed in Problem 8; recall that |B fl J\e = |J\
for all subintervals J of I. Now take A = (R \ I) U B; we claim that
A satisfies \A D J\e > ( 1/ 2)|J| for all intervals J of R. This is clear if
|J fl (R \ J)| > ( 1/ 2)|J|. Otherwise, |J fl I\ > (1/2)|J| and, consequently,
IB O J\e > \B D (J 0 / ) |e > |J 0 1\ > (1/2)| J\.
Solutions 233
61. (a) Observe that for intervals J = (a, 6), J\ = (c, d), J + J\ =
(a + c,b + d). First, suppose that A, B are bounded open sets. Then, since
the sum of open intervals is measurable, A + B is measurable. Also, by the
translation invariance of the Lebesgue measure, | (s + i) + (A-\-B)\ — \A+B\,
|s + A\ = |A|, and \t + B\ = |B|, and the conclusion is invariant under
independent translations of A and B. Thus we can assume that A D B = 0
and sup A = inf B = 0. Note that then A U B c A + B\ indeed, for a G A
234 13. Lebesgue Measure
64. Partition K n into cubes with vertices at the points t of the integer
(z\ , . . . , zn), Zi integer for all i. Let Q0 = [0, l ) n be the unit
lattice Z n , i.e.,
cube and note that Rn = (J^ezn(i+Qo)- Then translate the sets Af]{£+Qo)
into the cube Qo, i.e., consider the sets Ag = {x —£ : x E A C) Qe}. Since
Ee\Ae\ = E e\A nQ e\ = \A\ > 1 the Ai cannot be pairwise disjoint and
there are i ^ №in the integer lattice such that Agfl Ag/ ^ 0. Let a € AgD Agi.
Then a = x - £ = x' where x, x' € A . Thus 0 ^ x - x' = l - i' is in the
integer lattice.
Similarly, if |A| > N, A contains N points with integer coordinates.
Solutions 235
68 . Since the result for the sum A + B = A —(—B) follows from that for
the difference we prove the latter. Let 2n/ ( 2 n + 1) < 77 < 1. By Problem 57
there exist cubes Q and Q\ such that |Afl<5| > V |Q| and \BHQ\\ > rj |Qi|,
respectively. Suppose that i(Q\) < £(Q) and let к be the nonnegative
integer such that £(Q)/ 2 k+l < £{Q\) < £{Q)/ 2 k. Now, pick a subinterval
of Q of sidelength £(Q)/ 2 k so that the original assumption for Q still holds;
as observed in Problem 55 this is possible. Calling this cube Q again for
simplicity we have now £{Q\) < £(Q) < 2 £(Qi). Now, let x be such that
Q[ — x + Qi c Q and put В' = x + B; by the translation invariance of the
Lebesgue measure |В' П Q il = \x + (В D Qi)| = \BnQi\ > t?|Q i | = ц \Qi\.
Next, we want to prove that both A and B' intersect a substantial part
of Q and this ensures that their intersection has positive measure; A does by
construction. As for B' we have \B' П Q\ > \B' П Q^\ > 77\Q'X\> (r]/2 n) |Q|.
Thus, by elementary properties of measures, \АП B' nQ\ = |Afl(5| +
\B' П QI - I(A U B>) П Q| > 7? \Q\ + (77/ 2- ) \Q\ -\Q\ = (v ( ^ ) - l ) \Q\ > 0
and so, by Problem 67, (А П В' П Q) — {А П В' П Q) contains an interval
about the origin. Now, since {АПВ' П Q) is a subset of both A and B1,
A — B' contains this difference set and, consequently, A — B' contains an
interval about 0. Thus A —В contains an interval about x.
236 13. Lebesgue Measure
7 3 . Since \An\e > |Vj|e, |An|e > 0 for all n. For the sake of argument
suppose that An is measurable; then An —An contains a neighborhood of
the origin, which is not the case since An — An only contains the rationals
H n - r j ) , 1 < i ,j <n.
A s an application of this result we get that Egorov’s theorem cannot
be improved, i.e., there is a sequence { /* ,} of functions on [0,1] that does
not converge uniformly in any subset of I of positive measure. Indeed, let
fk = XLC=fcvfc) A: = 1 , 2 , . . . , and pick 0 < e < \V\e. Fix x E I. Then x E Vk
for only one k and so, / „ = 0 for n > k, and, consequently, limn fn{x) = 0
for all x E l . Moreover, since fk(x) = 1 for x E IJ ^ U K » and I Ki|e >
\V\e > e, {fk} cannot converge uniformly to 0 outside of a set of measure
< e.
74. (a) The statement is false. Let I f be a Cantor set in [0,1] with
positive measure and g(x) = d(x, K)\ g is continuous and vanishes precisely
on K. Now let f(x) = Jq g(t) dt.
(b) C be the Cantor discontinuum in [0,1],
The statement is false. Let
/ the Cantor-Lebesgue function, and g(x) = (x + f(x))/ 2; 5(0,1] —> [0,1]
is a bijection and has a continuous inverse. Now, [0,1] \ C = (Jn In where
the In are pairwise disjoint open intervals with |Ai| = 1. On each of the
In we have 2 g(x) = x + c, c a constant, so each In gets mapped into an
interval of length |/n|/2 and since their images are pairwise disjoint we have
C)\ = Y,n |^n|/2 = 1 /2 . Finally, since g(C) = [0,1] \ #([0,1] \ C),
b ( [ 0 ,1] \
it follows that 215(C ) | = 2 — 1 = 1 > 0 .
-------r ) U ( — r, n> l ,
\ n n +1/ vn+1 n)
and pick measurable sets An C Bn such that \An\= d\Bn\for all n. W e claim
that A = {JnAn has density d at 0. To see this, given 0 < r < 1, let n be such
that l / ( n + 1) < r < 1 /n and observe that Ufcln+i A n Bk C A n [ - r ,r ] C
238 13. Lebesgue Measure
lim inf
|gn(0,r)|
< lim
|gn(0,rfc)| 0/l/2k 0
r->0 1(0,01 rfc->0 l(0,rfc)| k l / 2 k+ a / 2 k 1 + ce '
8 5 . (a) Let 0 < к < t — 1. Then those x 6 [0,1] with xn = к are of the
form
«1 , «2 , 0*71—1 к
X= J + P + £n
+ J ^ i + m +y
a i f г*-2
-2
+ 0 2 Г -3 + + an -
£n-l + ^ +У
where 0 < a,j < l — 1 for 1 < j < n — 1 and 0 < y < l/P 1. Now, since the
expression a\in~ 2 4- -|-------- 1- an-\ assumes all the integer values from
0 to (£ - 1) ¿ ” ~ 2 0 - ¿n- 1 _ 1>
' + k je + k + 1
A>W= U [■ £n £n ).
о< к< t- 1,
i =0
\A fl Q(x,t)\
H \Q{x,£)\
L4c n Q ( : r , l ) l
= 0 a.e.
SSo \Q(x,£)\
and \AC\= 0.
242 13. Lebesgue Measure
94. The examples include the rationals and the set of reals with infinitely
many 7 ’s in their decimal expansion. Now, if A is such a set and t a rational
number with only finitely many nonzero digits in its decimal expansion, then
x G - A i f f i + x G A , i.e., A = t+A. The conclusion now follows from Problem
93.
Ho PI Kb 7^ 0 for all b < i2 also H fl Kf, ^ 0 for all b < fl or, in other words,
H C\K ^ 0 for every K € F. Thus, by Problem 7, \H\e — oo and, therefore,
by Problem 102, H cannot be measurable.
105. First, observe that \f(x)\ > 1 in (0,1). Now, derivatives sat
isfy the intermediate value property and, therefore, f(x ) cannot vanish or
change signs. So, if f'(x) > 1, f(x) is strictly increasing on (0,1). Thus
/ -1 ( [ / ( * ) » / ( ® + J0D = [x,x+h] and, consequently, \f~1 ([f(x), f(x+h)])\ =
f(x + h) —f(x) = h for h > 0 small enough and f(x ) = 1 in (0,1). This
means that f(x) = x + a with a = / ( 0 ) > 0 and 1 + a = / ( 1 ) < 1; hence
a = 0 and f(x) = x. Similarly, if f{x ) < —1, f(x) = 1 — x. Therefore
f(x) — x or = 1 - x.
106. Let O c O b e open and write O = where the Ik’s are
pairwise disjoint open intervals. Then <p- 1 ( 0 ) = (Jfc <£>_ 1 ( 4 ) and, conse
quently, |^_ 1 (0)| = Efe It>_ 1(4 )| = Efc 141 = \0 \. Now, if IV is a null set,
given e > 0, let O be an open set containing N such that \0\ < e. Then
<p- 1 (iV) c ip~l{0) and, consequently, 1(TV)|e < \0\ < e and <p_ 1 (lV) is
a measurable set of measure 0. Next, every A € £(1R) can be written as
A = F U N where F € Fa and N null. Thus tp~l(A) = <p~l{F) U y - 1 (lV)
and since <pis continuous, <p~l(F) is Fa and since is null, ip~l(A) is
measurable and it only remains to compute its measure. Let 0 , 0\ be open
sets such that A c O , O \ A c O i, and |Oi| < e; note that \<p~l{0 \ j4)| <
|^_ 1 (Oi)| = |Oi| < e. Now, since \ A) = </>- 1 ( 0 ) \ (p~l(A) it follows
that |<p- 1 (0)| — e < \(p_ 1 {A)\ < Iv?1 - (0)|, which, together with |^- 1 (0)| =
\0\ and \0\—£ < |A| < |0|, implies that \A\—£ < |</?—1(j4) | < |A|+e. Since
£ > 0 is arbitrary, |^4| = \<p~l{A)\.
1 0 7 . The statement is true and by Problem 106 it suffices to prove that
I / - 1 ( * 4 1 = 14 f ° r subintervals J c l .
1 0 8 . Yes. Let f(x) = IQ~N(X) where N(x) is the number of 0 ’s and 9 ’s
after the decimal points in the expansion of x\ for example, / ( 0 ) = 0 = / ( 1 )
and / ( 1 / 3 ) = 1 since 1 /3 = .3333... and 7V(l/3) = 0. / is well-defined and
assumes values between 0 and 1. The discontinuities of / are precisely the
points x where / is finite and this set is of measure 0 and has uncountable
intersection with every open interval.
K\ be the Cantor discontinuum in [0,1], K 2 the union
Alternatively, let
Ki, and so on for
of similar Cantor sets in each of the intervals in [0,1] \
Kn. Finally, let K = (Jn Kn. The function f(x) = 2~n for x € Kn and 0 for
x K satisfies the desired properties.
109. Let { / n} be an enumeration of the open intervals with rational
endpoints contained in [0,1] and, for n = Vn = {[A] 6 C :
1 , 2 , . . . , let
\A fl Jn | = 0 }, Qn = {[A] e C : \ A c O / „ | = 0 }; then <SC = ([jnVn) U
Solutions 245
(Un Qn)- W e claim that both Vn, Qn are closed and nowhere dense; since
the arguments are similar, we only do Vn- Given [A] G Vn and e > 0, let
[Ai] € Vn be such that |AAAi| < e. Then AC\In C ( ( A A A i ) n / n) U ( A i U / n)
and so \AC\In\< |AAAi| < e. Since e is arbitrary, \AC\In\= 0, [A] G Vn, and
Vn is closed. Next, Vn has empty interior. Let [A] G Vn and e > 0 arbitrary.
Let J C In be an interval with |J\ < e. Then d([A\, [AU J]) < e and clearly
[A U J] £ Vn', hence Vn has empty interior. Thus Vn, Qn are closed and
nowhere dense, Sc is of first category, and since ( £ , d) is a complete metric
space S is of second category.
114. (a) The statement is true. First, observe that a nonempty open in
terval J of E contains a compact nowhere dense subset of positive measure.
A direct proof of this observation without recourse to the Cantor discontin
uum goes as follows: Let Jo C J be a closed interval of positive measure, O
a dense open subset of E with \0\ < |Jo|, and set K = Jo \ O; clearly AT is a
compact nowhere dense subset of J of positive measure. Furthermore, given
an integer n > 1, by subdividing J into n nonempty open intervals (and
a finite set of points), it readily follows that J contains n pairwise disjoint
compact nowhere dense subsets of positive measure.
Let {Ik} denote an enumeration of the open intervals of positive length
with rational endpoints in E . W e construct n sequences {F^}, 1 < k < n,
say, of pairwise disjoint nowhere dense compact sets of positive measure
as follows. First, Ii contains n disjoint compact nowhere dense subsets of
positive measure, F^ , . . . , F™, say. Next, having chosen {Fj^}, 1 < k < n,
m < M , pairwise disjoint compact nowhere dense sets of positive mea
sure, note that U i < K n m < M ^ n is also compact and nowhere dense and,
consequently, Im contains a nonempty open subinterval J m , say, disjoint
from that set. Therefore Jm contains n disjoint closed nowhere dense
sets Fm , . . . , Fm , say, each of positive measure. Now, let A^ =
1 < k < n; by construction A \ , . . . , An are pairwise disjoint F„ subsets of
E . Also, if J is a nonempty open interval in E , J contains an open subin
terval with rational endpoints Im, say. But then |A^ fl J| > \F^ fl Im\> 0,
1 < k < n.
(b) The statement is true. W e construct pairwise disjoint closed nowhere
dense sets { A £ } , l < A : < n < o o , as follows. Let A\ denote a nowhere
dense compact subset of I\ of positive measure. Having constructed the
sets {A}}}, 1 < k < n — 1, we proceed in the n-th stage as follows. Note
that (Jk<m <n c l ° se(i an (l nowhere dense. Thus I n contains an open
subinterval Jn, say, disjoint from U k < m < n -^ k - A s noted above there are n
pairwise disjoint closed nowhere dense subsets A ” , A%, . . . , A ” of Jn, each of
positive Lebesgue measure. Now, let A& = Un>fc k = 1 ,2 ,...; the A ^’s
are pairwise disjoint Fa subsets of E . Let J be a nonempty open interval and
Solutions 247
Measurable and
Integrable Functions
Solutions
6 . If { / > 0 } € M , f is measurable.
10. Let tj > 0 be such that J = (—1
? ? /2 ,^ /2 ) C 2 J = (—rj,r]) C O. For
r € R let AT = + J) and note that U r e Q ^ r = f 1(U r€Q r + J) =
249
250 14. Measurable and Integrable Functions
/ 1(R) = X. Then y(Aro) > 0 for some r0 e Q and with A = Aro it follows
that f(x),f(y) E tq+ J for all x,y E A and, therefore, f{x) —f{y) E 2J C O.
xiN ,
x E N.
d(x, Oc)
/ 0*0 = d(x, Oc) + d(x, F)
k= 1
Bk D I(x) = 0. Now let x, x' G Bk and suppose that I{x) n I(x') ^ 0. Then
x G I{x') or x' G / ( X ) but neither of these alternatives is possible since
Bk n I(x) = 0. Since it is possible to choose a rational point in each of
the I(x) for x G Bk, these sets are finite or countable for each k and the
same is true for \JkBk. Hence |(Jfc Bk\ = 0 and / is continuous at each
i G l \ ((jH fc), that is, a.e. in R.
28. Since / is differentiable on R, it is continuous and, hence, Borel
measurable, as are fn(x) = n(f(x + 1 /n ) - f(x)) for all n. Thus f(x) =
limn fn(x) is Borel measurable on R.
3 0 . Note that M does not contain all open sets in Rn because, if it did,
it would contain the cr-algebra they generate, <B(Rn). Furthermore, since an
open set in Rn is the countable union of nonoverlapping closed cubes, A4
does not contain a closed cube Q = [a i, 6i] x ••• x [an, bn], say. Now, given
a closed interval [a, 6] C R, let
38. In fact, the following is true: / is measurable iff arcta n (/) is mea
surable. W e have just proved necessity. A s for sufficiency, if arcta n (/) is
measurable, {a rc ta n (/) > A} is measurable for all A G R. If A > 7t/ 2,
(a rc ta n (/) > A} = 0, and if A < —7t/
2, (a rc ta n (/) > A} = X. Now, for
t G R there exists A G (—tt/2 , tt/ 2) such that t = tan(A); then { / > t} —
{a rc ta n (/) > A }, which is measurable.
4 0 . (c) No.
\An\= 3 •6n -1 / 3 2n. Furthermore, note that E — \Jng H i 71}) has measure
\E\ = E n 3 •6n- 7 3 2n = (1 /3 ) E n C V s ) " - 1 = 1.
44. (a) Let D denote the dyadic rationals of J, \D\ = 0, and note
that f n is well-defined for x G I \ D , in other words, a.e. Specifically,
fi{x) = X( 1/ 2,1)( 7 , h(x) = X(i/4,2/ 4)(x) + X(3/ 4,4/ 4)(x), and, in general,
fn(x ) - E S 1" 1 X(2j+1 / 2n,2J+2/ 2n) ( 7 • Clearly the fn are measurable and
integrable.
(b) Let A = [0,1] \ D. Now, / is the pointwise limit of measurable
functions and so measurable, and since E n x<r(n)/^n < 1, / G Ll{A). Now,
with A = E n ^n2-n consider {x € A : f(x) < \} = {x e A : E n x <T(n)2_n <
E n An2- n } and observe that A = \JnAn where An = {x e A : xa^ = A*,
for 1 < k < (n - 1) and xa(n) < An}, n > 1. Now, An = 0, 1, and if
An = 0, then An = 0 and |Ai| = 0, and if An = 1, then An = {x e A :
x a(k) = Afc for 1 < k < (n - l ) , ^ ^ ) = 0 } and |An| = l / 2 n = A „ / 2n. Hence
l { / < A}| = E n ^ n /2 n = A for all A € [0,1] \ D. Finally, if A € D , pick
{A n} C [0,1 ] \ D such that An increases to A. Then { / < An} increases
to { / < A} and by continuity from below | { / < A}| = limn | { / < An}| =
limn An = A.
This statement can be stated as follows: If /i denotes the Lebesgue
measure in [0, 1] and \i o / -1 the image measure, then /z o / _1 = ¡x.
45. First, note that f(rx ) = rf(x ) for all rationals r; thus the result
follows readily for continuous functions. Furthermore, by linearity the con
tinuity of / at any x G R is equivalent to the continuity of / at 0.
(a) By the linearity of / we may assume that / € L 1( ( —77, 77)) for some
77 > 0. Then, since (x — 77/ 2, as + 77/ 2) c (—77, »7) for x G ( —77/ 2, 77/ 2),
integrating the identity f(x) + f(y ) = f(x + y) over ( —77/ 2, 77/ 2) yields
1 rn/ 2 1 rx+r)/2
f{x) = — / f{y) dy + - f(y) dy , x G (-T ? / 2, 77/ 2) .
V J—t)/2 V Jx—rj/2
Thus / is the integral of an integrable function + a constant in a neighbor
hood of the origin and, consequently, continuous there.
(b) First, note that / assumes finite values everywhere. Indeed, if / is
finite on a set A , then f(x —y) = f(x) —f(y) is finite for all x,y € A and,
consequently, / is finite in A —A. Now, if A is a Lebesgue measurable set
with |j4| > 0, A —A contains a neighborhood of the origin (—e, e), say, and,
therefore, since for 0 ^ rj G (—£,£) we have Ukez(^ + ( —e ,e )) = R, f is
finite everywhere.
LetAn = {|/| < n } for all 7i. Since / is finite everywhere we have
R = \JnAn and, therefore, \An\ > 0 for some n; then, by the argument
above with An in place of A there, An —An contains a neighborhood of the
256 14. Measurable and Integrable Functions
5 0 . The measurable functions are those that are constant except possi
bly on a countable subset of X. Ll(X) consists of those functions / which
are 0 except on a countable subset IJ^- Aj of X with Ylj lAfl M A ?) < °°> an<^
the sum is the Ll(X) norm of / .
5 2 . Note that the Bn are measurable and YinnXBn(x ) < J/(rc)| <
Y2n(n + l)xBn(x)- Hence by the monotone convergence theorem (M C T ),
E n « M 5 n) < fx l / l dn < E n ( n + l)/i(-B n). Thus / e Ll{X) implies
Y2n Ti/j.(Bn) < oo. Conversely, if this last sum is finite, since Y2nM - 8 n) <
n{X) < oo it readily follows that / G Ll(X).
54. Y2efQ%\Qe\~1 Jq* \f(y)\dVdx < /* » | /(v )| d y .
First, ||sjfe(/)||i <
Now, if g is a compactly supported continuous function on R n, g is uniformly
continuous and Sk(g) converges uniformly to g. Moreover, since |sfc(p)(x)| is
bounded by sup |g| uniformly in k and is compactly supported with support
independent of k for k large, by the L D C T Sk(g) —>■g in L 1(Rn).
If now / g L 1(Rn) is arbitrary, given e > 0, let g be a compactly
supported continuous function on R n such that ||/ — g||i < e. Then
Now, since sk is linear, ||sfc( / ) - Sfc(g)||i < ||/ - 5 ||i for all k. Thus
IISk(f) - /||i < 2e + ||sk(g) - flr||i. Now, since \\sk(g) - ^||i 0 the con
clusion follows. The a.e. convergence follows readily from the Lebesgue
differentiation theorem.
5 5 . Since / vanishes at —1/2 and 1/ 2, letting f(x) = 0 for |x| > 1/2
we may think of / as a continuous function on R. Now, by the translation
invariance of the Lebesgue integral or by making the substitution u = x —y ,
we have f k(x) = sk(y)f(x - y)dy , and since / vanishes for |x| > 1/2
it follows that fk(x) = flj sk(y)f{x - y)dy , and, consequently, \f(x) -
f k(x)\ < sk(y)\f(x) - f(x - y) |dy. Since / is continuous, / is uniformly
continuous on any compact interval, in particular [—2, 2], and so given e >
0, there exists 6 > 0 such that \y\ < 6 implies |f(x) — f(x — y)| < £.
sk(y) \f(x) - f(x - y)\dy < e / {M<5} sk(y) dy < e. Now,
Therefore / { |y!< i}
258 14. Measurable and Integrable Functions
note that since |/(s)| < N in B%, JA |/| dfj = fAnE¡N\f\ dfJ+JAnBc
N |/| dfj <
Ib n l/l dfi + N / j, ( A ) < e / 2 + e/2 = e.
6 7 . For the sake of argument suppose that /j({f < 0 }) > 0. Then, if
Ak = { f < —1/& }, fr(Ak) > 0 for some positive integer k and, consequently,
fA fd/j,< —fi(Ak)/k < 0, which cannot happen. Now, if the integral of /
over every A € M vanishes, by the above argument / > 0 fj-a.e. and, since
the assumption applies to —/ as well, also —/ > 0 ¡i-a.e. Hence / = 0 fx-a.e.
Finally, note that the result gives that if / is a nonnegative measurable
function on X and Jx / dfj, = 0, then / = 0 fi-a.e.
68 . Let T C {A € M. : JA f dfj, = 0 }. From the properties of the
integral, {A 6 M : JAfdfi = 0} is a A-system and, consequently, by the
7T-A theorem, since M { T ) = M , M C {A e M : JAf dfj, = 0 } and so by
Problem 67, / = 0 fi-a.e.
with the Xk pairwise disjoint and n{Xk) < oo for all k, by the argument
above n({x € Xk : f(x) ^ <?(£)}) = 0 for all k and so m ( { / ^ g}) = 0.
70. For the sake of argument suppose that B = {x e X : f(x) ^ F} has
/J>(B) > 0. Since F is closed, R \.F = (Jn In where the In are pairwise disjoint
open intervals of R. Then B C (Jnf ~ l{In) and, consequently, g{f~l(In)) >
0 for some n. Now, In is a bounded interval or the limit of an increasing
sequence {Jk} of bounded intervals and in the latter case, by continuity from
below, ¿x (/_ 1 ( Jk)) > 0 for some k. Thus /x ( /- 1 (J )) > 0 for some bounded
interval J C R \ F. Now, since /x is semifinite, / - 1 (J) is of finite measure
or there exists D c / - 1 (J ) with 0 < n(D) < oo. Now, if J = (x —r,x + r),
note that
m I o fd ^ x\ - m L u - x^ < m L rd,‘ = r
and, consequently, (l/g(D)) fD f dg, € J , which since F fl J = 0 cannot
happen. Thus n(B) = 0.
In particular, if for any A € M with 0 < n(A) < oo,
f f dg, < c,
H(A) Ja
the result applies with F = [c, oo) and, consequently, / < c /i-a.e. Note that
for the Lebesgue measure it suffices to consider cubes A above for then the
conclusion follows from the Lebesgue differentiation theorem.
71. If fj, is semifinite, the result follows from Problem 70 with F = [—c, c]
there. In the general case, by Chebychev’s inequality ¿t({|/| > c }) < oo and
if A = { / > c} and B = { / < —c }, h (A ),/ j,(B ) < oo. Now, cg,{A) <
f d / i < cfj,(A) and, therefore, fi(A) = 0. Similarly, c /j, ( B ) < I Jbf d iA <
cfi(B) and n(B) = 0.
72. First, the result is false if / is not integrable as the example f(x) =
sin(r), c = 2-7T, shows. Now, let a < b be real numbers such that 0 < b—a < c.
Then
pb pa+c pa+c
/ f(y)dy+ / f (y ) d y = / f(y)dy = 0
Ja Jb Ja
and
pa+c pb+c pb+c
/ f{y)dy+ / f {y )d y = / f(y)dy = 0 ,
Jb J a+c Jb
77. / ( « ) dx = 3.
7 8 . Since f ( x ) = E n n X[i/ion+1,i/io n](a:;)> / is Borel measurable. Now,
nn/ rn = f /( r —l ) 2 for r > 1 and so, by the M C T , f f f ( x ) dx =
by calculus E
¿ nn(10-n - 10"(n+1)) = (9/10) E n nl0_n = (9/10)(10/92) = 1/9.
7 9 . As in Problem 2.116, the atoms have measure y,p({l}) = F( 1) —
F ( l _ ) = 3, Mf ( { 4 }) = 1, and the intervals have measure yp((—oo, 1]) =
.F (l- ) — F(—oo) = 0, / i f ( ( l , 4 ) ) = 0, and y,p((4, oo)) = 0. Hence for a
Borel set A in R, H f ( A ) = np(Ar\(—oo, l ) ) + iuJp ( A n { l } ) + ^ F ( - 4 n ( l ,4 ) ) +
/iF (^ 4 n {4 })+ iiiir(A n(4,oo)) = 3 x a ( 1 )+ X ^ (4 ). Now, the integral fRx2 dy,p(x)
is the limit of approximating sums and one readily obtains that it is equal
to 3 • l 2 + 1 •42 = 19.
I-N 1/0*01 dx Jr 1/1 < oo as N - » oo and so fjg < oo, and, in particular,
g is finite a.e. in I.
fn(x) = |/(x +n )|. Since |/| is nonnegative and
(b) For each integer n, let
measurable, so is each fn and by the translation invariance of the Lebesgue
measure, / R \f(x + n)| dx = fR |/(x)| dx for all n. Thus, by the M C T ,
Jr E n fn(x) dx = Y 2 n Jr \f(x + n )l dx = Yin Jr \f(x)\dx, which is finite
only if fR |/(x)| dx = 0 and, consequently, / = 0 a.e.
(c) By the translation invariance of the Lebesgue integral and Problem
86> Jr |/(A n(x — x„))|dx = |An |_1 fR \f(x)\dx for all n. Then, by the M C T ,
h ( E n I/(An (x - ®„))|) dx = ( Z n |An|_ 1 ) ( / R \f(x)\dx).
9 1 . |Al| is the Riemann integral of / over [0,1].
. Í 2 x s i n ( l /x 2) — ( 2 /x ) c o s ( l /x 2), x ^ 0,
/ < I ) = \0, * = 0,
Then the series converges by the L D C T , the integrand is in •Z/1([ 0 ,1]), and
OO «1 oo
x) 1 ln(x) dx ^ / z T?+fc ln(x) dx = — + fe)~2 .
o /° k=0
* ! 2 1 — 12/ 2 fn/2
/ x+ 1
dt < № <
Jo X + t
dt.
Then for x > 0 close to 0 we have J^ 2 1/(x + t)dt = ln(( 7r/2 + x)/x ) ~
— ln(2x/7r). Also, j ^ 2 —t2(x + 1 ) dt is bounded and so o(ln(x)). It thus fol
f( x) =
lows that / ( x ) ~ — ln(2x/7r) at the origin and, consequently, lima._,o+
oo. Finally, since J^ 2 cos (t) dt = 1 it follows that
1 1 /*^/2 1 p r/2 i
X + 7 f/2 = ^X T+ W 9 J/ o
7T/2 °°S^ dt - - X~ Jo/ C0S( 0 dtz=xX'
and, therefore, f(x) 1 /x at oo and lim ^ o o / ( x ) = 0.
266 14. Measurable and Integrable Functions
n ~2krr,2k
The fn are continuous and limn fn(x) = e * 2 cos (ax) for all x € R. Now,
_ 71 n2k\^,\2k °° nk\„\k
= e_x2ea|x|
k= 0 v ' 1k
—= n0 v '
and since 2o|a;| < (a2 + |x|2), \fn(x)\ < e *2e0l*l < e“2/ 2e x2/ 2 € L 1(R).
Therefore by the L D C T ,
poo n2kJ2k „ ““ 2k
n2k /»oo
p
e x2x 2kdx.
(2*)!
s - ' d
Solutions 267
First, we compute lima._>0+ xu2 {y/u/x). Since y/u/x < v{y/u/x) <
l+y/u/x, squaring, u/x < v2 {yfu[x) < 1 + 2 y/u/x+u/x and, therefore, u <
xu2 (y/u/x) < x + 2 y/ux + u, which implies that lim:r^.0+ xv2 (y/u/x) = u.
Now, we claim that u~1 ^2 f(xi/2 (y/u/x)) -> u~ 1 /2 f(u) boundedly as x —) 0+ .
268 14. Measurable and Integrable Functions
1 1 0 . (a) For the sake of argument suppose that for every x G I there
exists fx G C(I) such that / X(x) / 0 and fx fx dy — 0. Since fx is contin
uous fx(y) / 0 for y in a neighborhood Vx of x in I. Thus I C U w * vx
and so there exist finitely many x i , . . . , xn such that I C ( Ji< fc < n Vxk- Now,
the function / ( x ) = YSk=ifxk(x) is strictly positive and by assumption
Si f d y = Jj fx k d y =
Ylk =l
Si fx k d y = 52k = i(fi fxic d y )2= 0, which,
since / ( x ) > 0 for x € / , can only happen if y(I) = 0, and this is not the
case.
111. Given k > 0, there is an open set Ok D A such that \0'k\< 2 ~k.
Let O i = 0[ and Ok+i = Ok D 0'k+l\ {0 & } is a decreasing sequence of open
sets containing A and \Ok\ < 2~k, k > 1. Let / = J2k k Xok; by the M C T ,
fun f(x) dx = Y,kk \°k\ < oo.
Let x € A and fix A: € N; since x € A C Ok it follows that Q(x,£) c Ok
for t small enough. Hence XQ{x,t) f > k XQ(x,e) , and so,
EiblLamdy-m<)\La
Thus
lim in f— - — ttt / f{y)dy > k, all x€A.
\Q(x,£)\ JQ{x/)
Since this holds for every k, the conclusion follows.
1 1 3 . (a) By the Lebesgue differentiation theorem
to = «--------- - Xa (v ) dy = x a (x ) a.e. x G
r->0+ |H(x,r)| r-^0+ \B(x,r)\ L
J B (x ,r )
it readily follows that limr_*.o \A H B(x, r)|/|B(x, r)| = 0 for a.e. x G Ac and
a.e. x G Ac is a point of dispersion of A.
(b) Let / n(x) = \A n B(x, l/n )| /| B (x , l/n )| ; by (a), fn -A- xa for a.e.
x G A. Setting e = \A\/2 in Egorov’s theorem it follows that there is
Solutions 269
Ai c A such that / „ ->• 1 uniformly for x € A± and |^4i| > \A\/2. Let
Ao — A^; since { / n} converges uniformly in Aq there is an N such that
\fn(x) —1| < 1 /2 for all x G Ao and n > N and so fn{x) > 1 /2 for those n.
Thus |AnB(x, l/n )| /| £ (a :, l/n )| > 1 /2 for all x G Aq and n > N.
(c) \A\A\ = 0 .
1 1 4 . By assumption |.An(o, 6)|/|(a, b)\ = rj for some constant 0 < rj < 1,
all a, b € D. Now, for each x G I there is a sequence {(an, 6n) } of intervals
with endpoints in D that converges to x and so limn \An(an, 6„)|/|(an, 6n)| =
rj everywhere. Now, by the Lebesgue differentiation theorem the limit is 0
or 1 a.e., and so, if rj — 0, |j4| = 0 and if rj = 1, |^4| = 1.
and, consequently,
ry+h
1
dt.
h
Finally, since the limit of this expression as h -¥ 0 is 0 and by the Lebesgue
differentiation theorem is f(x) - f(y ) a.e., we get that / ( x ) = f{y) a.e. and
/ is constant.
1 2 4 . (a) Let R > 0 be large enough so that |/(x)| dx < e2. Then
by Chebychev’s inequality, e|{|x| > R : \f(x)\ > e}| < / { |a|>Ji} \f(x)\dx <
e2, and so |/(x)| < e except possibly on a set B c {|x| > R} with measure
\B\<e.
Solutions 271
(b) Construct Bk as in (a) for e / 2 k, k > 1; the conclusion then holds for
B = {JkBk, \B\<e.
125. First, by Problem 86, fR \f(anx)\dx = K H fR \f(x)\dx and so,
by the M C T , fRJ2nPnI/ ifiinx) |dx = (fx \f\dfi) J2nPn/\an\ < oo, which
implies that PAf(anx)\ converges a.e. and, consequently, limn Pt¡f(ocnx)\
= 0 a.e. In particular, if £ n l /| a n| < oo, limn | /(a nx)| = 0 a.e.
integrable / .
OO p■ n + e / ( 2 M y /ñ )
£/
n = N Jn
f(x) dx
OO
€ £
a E 2y/ñ 2My/ñ
n=N
= _ í_ f i = 00 ,
4M
n=N
129. First, we claim that Jk + 1 Y^n If( x + «n)| dx < 00 for each finite
integerk. To see this let Am = {n G N : an e [m,m + 1]}, m > 1; by
assumption, Am contains at most N elements. Now, for an 6 Am)
pK~\~CL‘ 1
fc+an+
+ an)| dx = I \f(x)\dx
k+m +2
|/(x)| dx ,
k+m
272 14. Measurable and Integrable Functions
■fc+l 00 rk+1
^2 \f(x+on)\dx = Y / 1 \f(x + o„)| dx
Then E n \f(x + °n)| < oo a.e. on each interval [k, k + 1] and, hence,
hmn f(x + an) — 0 a.e. on each [k, k + 1], and, consequently, a.e. on R.
130. (a) The claim is that lim infa._f0+x \f(x)\ = 0. For the sake of
argument suppose there exist rj, 6 > 0 such that x\f(x)\ > g/ 2 whenever
0 < x < <5. Then ll/Hi > \f(x)\dx > c f£ x~l dx = oo, which is not the
case.
(b) First, choose ak -»• 0 such that Efc \fk(x)\dx < oo; this can be
//
done for any sequence of integrable functions by putting 0 ^ ak = ftk/\\fk\\i
with Efc Pk < oo. Thus, by (a) applied to / = Efc «fcl/fcl there is a decreas
ing sequence {&„} such that bnf(bn) -¥ 0 and so, ak\imnbn\fk(bn)\ = 0 for
all A;.
1 3 1 . The limit is A.
1 3 2 . The limit is A.
1 3 3 . The limit is 0.
= IJ
1
/
B ( x .r ) \ B ( v .r )
/( * ) dz- !
J BB ( y ,r ) \ B ( x ,r )
f(z) dz
< / \f(z)\dz
J ( B ( x ■, ,r )\ B (y,r )) U (B ( y,r )\ B (x ,r ))
\f(z)\ dz < £
-L I B ( x ,r)A B (y,r)
since \B(x,r)AB(y,r)\ < 2|x — y\ < 6 . Since this holds for any x,y € R
with \x —y\ < <5/2, g is uniformly continuous on K.
r}. Therefore, assuming that dBr is /¿-null and that /t is complete, we have
f X B rn f X B r Ai-a-e. and \fXBrJ , \fXBr \ < \f\ G L(X). Thus, by the
L D C T , g(rn) g(r).
143. The condition is not necessary if the measure is infinite as the
example of the Lebesgue measure on R, An = [n, n + 1], and / any in
tegrable function shows. However, it is necessary if the measure is finite.
Let rj > 0 . Then by Chebychev’s inequality, r/g,({x € An : f(x) > v}) <
J{xeAn:f(x)>v} f dv - ¡An f dLi’ and so Kmnn{An n { / > Í7» = 0 for all
77 > 0. Now, since X = N U (Jfc{/ > l/k} with /¿(IV) = 0, it readily fol
lows from continuity from below that lim*, n(An D { / > l/k}) = /¿(A n);
let k be large enough so that /¿(A n n { / > l/k}) > /¿(A n) /2 . Then
limn /¿(A n) < 2 limn M A i n { / > l/k}) = 0.
limnfxA„ = 0 /¿-a.e. and fxAn < / G
The condition is sufficient: Since
Lx(X), by the L D C T limn fAn fd/j, = lim„ fx fxAndfi = 0.
144. (d) implies (a) Consider the set function ¡i{A) = |</?- 1(.A)|, A G
B(I)‘, as in Problem 2.45 /¿ is a Borel measure on I. Now, /¿ coincides with the
Lebesgue measure on the intervals [0,x] and, therefore, for 0 < x < y < 1,
/*((*»*/]) = M ([0,I/])-A»([0,®]) = |[0,y]|—|[0,x]| = |(x,y]|,i.e., on all intervals.
Problem 3.23 implies that n{A) = |A| for all Borel A in I.
= (
and, consequently, ip 1(I) is measurable and \<p x(/)| = (6 — o )/2 +
(6 — a ) / 2 = |/|. The conclusion follows now as in Problem 144.
1 4 6 . (a) implies (b) Given A e M , let B = Then
T- 1 (B) C B and, by Problem 2.112(b), /¿(B ) = 0 or 1. If /¿(B ) = 0,
by monotonicity /¿(A) = 0. On the other hand, if /¿(B ) = 1, since A C B
and B\A = ft suffices to prove that /¿ ((T - t (A ))\ A ) = 0
for all i. W e proceed by induction. Since by assumption /¿ ( A A T - 1(A)) = 0
the statement is true for i = 1. Next, assuming it true for i, note that
/¿ ( ( T -( i+1) ( A ) ) \ A )
The conclusion follows readily from this since integrable functions are con
tinuous in the L 1(R) metric.
(b) First, observe that Jq ip(x) dx = Jq ip(x + (3) dx = <p(x) dx\ simi
larly, fkp+1^ <p{x) dx = <p(x) dx for all k > 0. Let c=(3~ 1 <p(x) dx.
Then / 02/3(<p(x) — c)dx = / Q2/3 <p(x) dx — 2 Jq (p(x)dx = 0 and, similarly,
f 2kp+ 1 ^ ( p (x) — c) dx — 0 for all k > 0. Hence, changing variables, it follows
that / 22^ n1^ n(</>(n:r) — c) dx = 0 for all k, n > 0.
Next, observe that if h(x) = Ylj=iajXij(x) is a step function, then
limn fRh(x)(<p(nx) —c)dx = 0. Indeed, note that JRh(x)(ip{nx) —c)dx =
aj Si-{tf {nx) — c) dx. Now, as observed above the integral on any
subinterval of Ij of the form [2k¡3/n, 2 (k + l)/3 /n ] vanishes, so we are left
with an integral over at most two intervals containing the endpoints of
Ij, IjtL,Ij,R , say, each of length not exceeding /3 /n . Thus, with M =
supieR \<p(nx) — c|, |Jj (ip(nx) —c) dx| < 2 Mf3/n for all j and, consequently,
I Jk h(x)(tp(nx) - c) dx| < (2 M/3/n) £ i=1 |o,-|.
Now, givene > 0, let h be a step function such that \\f — h||i <
e/2M. Then, since fRf(x)(<p(nx) —c) dx — JR(f(x) - h(x)) ((p(nx) —c) dx +
Jr h(x)(<p(nx)—c) dx, we have |fRf(x)(cp(nx)-c) dx| < M fR \f{x)-h(x)\ +
|fRh(x)(<p(nx) — c)dx | = A + Bn, say. A s noted above A < e/ 2 and
Bn < (2Mfi/n) J2j=i |uj| can be made arbitrarily small provided n is suffi
ciently large. Therefore limn fRf(x)<p(nx) dx = cfRf(x) dx.
ip satisfies (a), <p(x) = \ip(x)\ satisfies (b). In particular, ip{x) =
Now, if
sin(a;) with/3 = it will do. It then follows that limn fRf(x) sin(nx) dx = 0
and limn fRf(x) |sin(nx)| dx = (2/n) fRf(x) dx. Similar results hold for
cos(ar) and |cos(x)|.
149. Recall that we say that / , <7are independent if p(f~ 1 (A)C\g~1 (B))
= p(f~ 1 (A))p(g~1 (B)) for all Borel A, B in R. Let A, B C R be Borel. Then
cos- 1 (.i4) is Borel and c o s ( /) _ 1 (A ) = / - 1 (cos- 1 (A )); similarly, sin_ 1(B ) is
Borel and sin(p)- 1(B ) = g~1 (sin~1 (B)). Then
M (/- 1 (cos- 1 (,4)) n<?_ 1 (sin_ 1 (B ))) = / i ( / _ 1 (cos_ 1 (yl)))M(p_ 1 (sin_1(5 )))»
and s o //(c o s ( / ) 1(Jl4) fl sin(^) 1(JB)) = p(cos(f) ^ A ))//(s in (< 7) 1(B )) and
cos( / ) and sin(g) are independent.
1 5 0 . First, since binary expansions may not be unique, we chose the ex
pansion of x that has the least number of l ’s (terminating in 0’s). W e
have to prove that \f~l (A) n f ~ l{B)\ = | /^ ( A ) ! \imiB)\ for integers
n 7^ m and Borel subsets A , B c { 0, 1}. Since the subsets of { 0, 1} are
0, { 0 } , { 1 } , { 0 , 1 } , if one of A or B is 0 or { 0 ,1 } , the condition obviously
holds. So we only need to verify the condition when A and B are { 0 } or
{ 1}; suppose that they are { 0 } . W ith no loss of generality we may assume
that n < m. Now, since half of the points in [0, 1] have xn = 0 and for
the other half xn = 1, clearly | /“ 1( { 0})| = 1/ 2; similarly, |/T^ 1( { 0})| = 1/ 2.
Consider now those points in / “ 1( { 0 } ) D / “ ^ {O } ) , their expansions are
like ,x\. . . xn-i0xn+i . . . r m_i0a;m+ i . . . , so exactly 1 /4 of the points in [0,1]
have xn = 0 and xm = 0 and so, \f ~ 1( { 0 } ) n / “ 1({0})| = 1 /4 , and this gives
the conclusion in this case. A similar argument works for the other subsets
of A and B.
f(x) = J2nanXAn(x) and g(x) = E m bmXBm{x)
1 5 1 . First suppose that
An = / - 1({a n})
are simple functions. Now, since the On’s are all different,
and, similarly, Bm = 5_1( { M ) - Then fx XAnXBmdp = p(An n Bm) =
p(An) p{Bm) and, consequently,
Finally, since
x Jx Jx Jx
and
Jx \Jx / \Jx J Jx Jx
= h + h + h + hy
say. First, note that |/i| < Jx\f-<P\ \d\dfi< eM*¡i(X) and, similarly, I/ 2I <
eMfjb(X). Next, observe that IJ3I < Jx \cp— f\ fx \ij)\dfi < eM'fj,(X)2
and, similarly, |J4I < e Mn(X)2. Finally, |fx fg dfi - Jx f dpt fx g dfi\ <
e(Mfj,(X) + M'¡jl(X) + Mpi(X)2 + M'/j,(X)2), which can be made arbitrarily
small with e and the conclusion follows.
for all IV > 1. A similar situation occurs for all n ^ m. In other words, if n <
m, say, <pn is constant on the intervals ipm, changes signs and, consequently,
J-N Vnirf'Pmix) dx = 0 for all N > 1.
To proceed with the proof let g be a bounded function with support
in [- N , N ] for someN. Now, since ||<pn||2 = (27V)1/ 2 on any L2 ([-N,N}),
{{2N)~l/ 2 ipn} is an ON set in L2 ([—N, N]) and by Bessel’s inequality
156. (a) For the sake of argument suppose that n(x) = 1 for all x €
X. Then the An are pairwise disjoint and oo = Yk = M(Ufc -''U) ^
pi{X) < oo, which is not the case.
(b) Observe that oo = Y k » ( Ak) = Yk fx X A k dg < fx Yk X A k dg <
(supxeX n(x))ir(X).
F = lim supn An\by Problem 2.105, pi(F) > e > 0. Let x G F ;
(c) Let
then x 6 U nAn and so x € Ani for some n\. But then x € U ^ = m + i An an<^
so x G An2 for some n,2 > n\. Continuing this way, x belongs to infinitely
many A n’s.
157. Note that iff(x) = X)m =i XAm{x)i then f(x) > k pi-a.e. Then
integrating, k < Jx f d/j, = Ym= i M A n ) and, therefore, n(Am) > k/n for
some 1 < m < n.
Yn=iXA„\ then Yn=i ^ (^ n ) > V^. Observe that since
1 5 9 . Let / =
fAc f dpi < aNg(Ac), it readily follows that fAfdpb = Jx / dpi —fAc fdpi>
r)N —aN(l —pi(A)) = N(r] —a) + aNpi(A). Now, since fAf dpi < Npi(A),
we have N(rj —a) + aNpi(A) < NpL(A), or {g —a) < (1 — a)/j.(A), hence the
conclusion.
Now define Hj(x) = |/| ( x /L — XIr )-, I dyadic, with right and left halves
Ir and II, respectively. This is an ONS.
Write a dyadic interval J = J l U J r , where J r is the left half of J and
J r is the right half of J. First, observe that if
dx = c and Hj(x)<p{x) dx = 0 ,
V\ L
then
1
c.
I^l I
J h-\fi{x)(p{x) dx = 1
2 dx = 0 .
■k k + 1
2n f ip(x) dx = C whenever <= [1.2].
J[k/2n,(k+l)/2n] _2n ’ 2n
Continuing to extend and then subdividing the resulting intervals we have
k k+ 1
2n [ (p(x) dx = C for C [0, o o ) .
J[k/2n,(k+l)/2n] 2n ’ 2n
280 14. Measurable and Integrable Functions
Now, for each i > 0 w e pick dyadic intervals I that contain x, |/| —»•0 , and
apply the Lebesgue differentiation theorem to obtain for almost all x,
Similarly, if J j_i>0] vK®) dx = d, <p(x) = d for almost all x € (—o o , 0). There
fore <p(x) = d x ( - o o , 0 ) ( x ) + c X ( 0 ,o o ) ( * ) a.e. in M .
1 f(x + 1 )
ds > t
/( * ) №
and, since the left-hand side above goes to 0 as x —¥ oo, so does the right-
hand side.
Sufficiency next. For the sake of argument suppose that for some t > 0,
there exist 77 > 0 and xn 00 such that f(xn + 1 ) > r]f(xn) for all n. Then
/ i nn+t f ( s) d s > t f(xn + t) >tri f(xn), and, consequently,
1 f°°
lim s u p - 77—r / f (s ) d s> t r )> 0 ,
I-K30 j(x) Jx
= ( 1/ 2) f \f-g\dy.
Jx
Solutions 281
í \f~
Jx
9 \df¿= í
J a+
(f-g)d /i+
J a-
(g — f) dfj [
= A (A + ) - u(A+) + v(A~) - A(A - ) = 2(A (A + ) - z/(A + )).
oo nj + l OO 71j + 1
y ! l^n — An Mn = An
n j = 0 n=n¿+l j=0 n=rij+l
oo » oo
j =o j =o
L P Spaces
Solutions
283
284 15. LP Spaces
8 . Since f(x ) ~ x a near the origin and f(x) ~ x &at infinity we need
ap < 1 and ftp > 1, or < p < a -1 .
9 . First, (a). By symmetry we may restrict ourselves to the first quad
rant. Let A = /J /J fo(xi+X 2 + x.})~pdxidx2 dx3 . The change of variables
x\ = u,X2 = f 1/ 2, £3 = w1 /3 with Jacobian J = 6- 1u- 1/ 2to- 2 / 3, followed by
passing to spherical coordinates transforms the integral into
The integrals involving 0 (since sin 0 ~ 6 near 0 ) and <j>(since cos <f>~ 1 —4>2/2
near 7r / 2) are finite. So the finiteness of A depends on the integral with
respect to p and this integral is finite iff 5 /6 — 2p > —1, or 0 < p < 1 1/1 2 .
A similar reasoning applies to (b) except that now we must consider
lim ^ o o p5/ 6-2P dp, which is finite iff 5 /6 — 2p < —1, or p > 1 1/1 2 .
lO - /{|a;|<l} (1 — \x \)Pdx = E felo / { l - 2- * < M < l - 2-(fc+1)} (■*■ “ 1*1)Pdx =
E fclo Iki say. Now, on each Ik we have 2_ (fc+1)p < ( l — |x|)p < 2~kp.
Furthermore,
Since ]TV 2 k(n ap^k 7P < oo when p < n/a or p < n/a and p > 1/ 7 ,
5 G LP(Mn) for those p.
12. For / apply an argument similar to the proof of Problem 7 with
<p(\x\) = \x\~P ln7(|a;|)x{|x|>i}(x).
1 3. In the setting of the Lebesgue measure on Rn consider the function
f{x) = |®|-n/i»(ln- 2/ p(l/|x|)x{|*|<i} + ln_ 2/p (|x|)x{ |1|>1}). Then by Prob
lems 11 and 12, / € L p(Kn) and / ^ Lq{R n) for 0 < q < 00, q ^ p.
15. For 0 < p < q. Note that / may fail to be in Lq(X ) as the
function f(x) = —1 + 1 /x 1/ 9 in [0,1] shows. In this case | {/ > i}| =
\{x < 1/(1 + t)q}\ = 1 /(1 + t)q < 1 /(1 + tq) but f £ Lq([0 ,1 ]).
1 7 . Observe that
and so by the M C T ,
2n(2n _ !)(2n+l _ 1) 1
= lim
n 6 •8n 3 ‘
E n * ‘ f 1 /1 * 4 * = / e,|/l4 « < 00 .
k=0 kl Jx Jx
Hence / G Lk(X) for all integers k and by Holder’s inequality / G LP{X)
for all 0 < p < 00. The function f(x) = ln(l/|rc|) in [0,1], 0 < e < 1, shows
that / is not necessarily bounded.
286 15. LP Spaces
f ghf{x) — 1 p
Mf(t) = l i m ----------------dp(x) = Jx f(x) eVW d^ x ) .
n —1
1
nV 1 S ( / /0?) dv f n
/ ( x n,k)P i
k= 0 VJ[k/n,{k+l)/n) ' fc=0
and, consequently, the limit in question is
lim
n (il E /w ) 1/P=(/ dy)1,P■
Solutions 287
Next, given / G LP(I), let g be continuous with ||/ — g\\p < e /3 . Then,
since |||an ||#> - H&nl^l < ||an - bn\\eP, we get
f ( v ) d v ) T) 1,r
V t^0 XJ\k/n,(k+l)/n) ' '
n —1
p\ 1/pi
_ (n P l S ( / 9 (y)dyY )
V rTq
Í V7 [fe /n ifc +
•/[fc/n,(A lV n )
:+l)/n) 7 7
V ^ Vj { k / n , ( k + l ) / n ) 7 >
Also, |||/||p — H^llp | < 11/ — g\\p < e /3 . The conclusion follows by
combining these estimates.
LP(X) verifies
2 5 . Not always. In the setting of Problem 24 any / G
f(b) = 0, and so if g is given by g(a) = 1 and g(b) = oo, then fg G
288 15. IP Spaces
equal to the number of points in that set and to all the other sets we assign
the measure oo.
2 8 . The statement is true when p < oo. The situation is different for
p = oo. Let f = x R and denote by B(f, 1) the ball in L °°(R ) centered at / of
radius 1. Now, if g e B(f, 1), then | l-p ( x ) | = \f(x)-g(x)\ < ||/-p||oo < 1
a.e. and, therefore, g(x) > 0 a.e. Thus g G T and / is an interior point of
T.
2 9 . First, necessity. For the sake of argument suppose that
and let |ffc| —> oo be such that \(p(tk)\q > 2 k \tk\p. Let {Ah} be pairwise dis
joint measurable subsets of X with p(X)/2k+1 \tk\p < p(Ak) < p(X)/2k\tk\p
and f{x) = Yk tkXAk(x ). Then |/(x)|p = Yk M pXAfc(x ) and, consequently,
Jx \f\pdp < p(X) Y M p/2k\tk\p < /¿(X) < oo. Now, \<p(f)\q = \<p(tk)\q
> 2k\tk\p on Ak- Moreover, since p(Ak) > p(X)/2k+1 \tk\p it follows that
M f ) \ \ i > Y k ^ h \ p/ 2 k+1 \tk\p = oo.
A s for sufficiency, since q> is continuous there is a constant K > 0 such
that \<p(t)\q < K{ 1 + |i|)p for all t G R. Thus, if / G L?{X), <p(f) € Lq{X).
k > 0 , 2 ~kr—2_ (fc+1)r = c 2 ~kr
3 1 . Sufficiency holds. First, note that for
where c = (1 - 2~r). Then I = c Y t= o(2~kr ~ 2_(fc+1)r) / {|/|< 2fc} \f\qdp =
3 2 . (a) iff (b) Since \f\p G Ll{X) it follows from Problem 4.52.
(a) iff (c) First, since ot > 1, £ n>J? n~a ~ all V > 0. Now, the series
in (c) can be writtenfx |/|7(£ | /| i/ 0< n n _ a ) dp ~ fx |/|'y(|/|1//3) 1_0E ¿A* ~
fx |f\pdp and the equivalence follows.
33. (a) By the translation invariance of the Lebesgue integral ry is
bounded in Lp(Rn) with norm 1.
B( 0, R), say, such that ||/—g\\p < e and let 0 < J < 1 be such that, if |/i| < Ô,
||g - Thg\\oo < e / ( l + R)n/p. Moreover, since supp(g - Thg) C -6(0, R + 1)
it follows that fRn \g(x) - rhg(x)\p dx < ||y - Thg\\lo\B(0, R + 1)| < £p. Also
fRn |rhf(x) - rhg(x)\Pdx < ||/ - g\\l < £p. Thus, if |fe| < <5, \\rhf - f\\p <
I K / - rhg\\P + |\Thg - g\\v + ||y - /||p < 3e.
(c) Observe that if g G IP(MP) has compact support, ryg and g have
disjoint supports for |y| sufficiently large and so by the translation invariance
of the Lebesgue integral \\ryg — g\\p = 2||g||p. Now, given / € LP(Mn) and
e > 0, let g be compactly supported and satisfy ||/ — g\\p < s. Then
I II7? / / —/U p - Ilrÿ 5—5Üp I < \\(Tyf-f)-(ryg-g)\\P < ||t3/ (/-5')| | p + | | /-5| I p <
2e. Finally, let |y| be large enough so that \\ryg —g\\p = 21/ p||p||p. Then
I \\Tyf - f ||P - 2 1/ p||/||p 1 = 1 1 1 ^ / - / ||p- 2 1/ p||/||p - ||Tyg -g\\p+ 2l/r\\g\\p | <
11 \rv f ~ f\\p ~ ||ryg - g\\p\+ 2x/ p |||5 ||p - ||/||p| < 2 e + 21/ p£, which implies
that lim|pKoo ||Tyf - /||p = 21/ p||/||p.
A s for the weak convergence, fixip G Lq(Rn); we claim that for com
pactly supported g G Lp(Rn), limip^oo fRn Tyg(x)ip(x) dx = 0. First, given
e > 0, there exists a ball B = B(0,R) such that JBc \ip(x)\qdx < eq. Sup
pose supp(<7) c 5 ( 0 , M) and note that if |æ| < M and \y\ > M + R, then
\x —y\> |î/| — |æ| > R. Therefore
where the second summand goes to 0 with |y| and, by Holder’s inequality
and the translation invariance of the Lebesgue integral, the first summand
goes to 0 as k —> 00 uniformly in y. Therefore the limit is 0. Now, since
the expression converges weakly to 0, the strong limit, if it exists, must be
0 but this is not possible since ||rp/||p = ||/||p.
34. T is bounded since a sequence { / n} such that ||/n ||p —> 00 has
no convergent subsequence. For the sake of argument suppose there exist
£ > 0, { / „ } C T, and \hn\-»• 0 such that \\Thnfn-fn\\P > £ for all n. Passing
to a subsequence if necessary we may assume that { / n} converges to some
Solutions 291
where
(b) If p < r, /i({|/| > A })1/? < ||/||^p/A r/ p and so Ap(f) is bounded by
p(X)
JO
f d\ + \\f\\T
J p f
Jf)
\ ~ r/ P d \ = pp(X) H— - — rfr~p)/p ||/||£/p .
r —p
The conclusion follows by minimizing with respect to 77.
292 15. IP Spaces
37. di(f,Si) = 0 .
Next,d2 (f,S 2 )- S2 is the unit sphere in L 2([0,1]). Let g g S2; then
11/ - 9\\l = 11/1 1 1-2 fo № 9 (x) dx + \\g\\l = 1 3 /1 2 - 2 £ f(x)g(x) dx >
1 3 /1 2 - 2||/||2 = 1 3 /1 2 - l /\ /3 . Equality is attained at g = //| | /| | 2. There
fore the distance is ||/ — (//||/||2)||2 = 1 ~ II/II2 = 1 — l / \ / l 2 .
Finally, if p= 00, let ||p||oo = r. Then
If(y)-f(x)\<J\
f'(t)\dt<\y-x\1/2(J \f'(t)\2dtj
and, therefore, f? < 1 for 0 < a < 1 /2 . On the other hand, we claim
that 77 = 0 0 for 1 /2 < a < 1. To see this consider the functions fe(x) =
2ce (x2 + e2) 1/ 4, e > 0, with ce chosen appropriately. Then
— = \ ( — ln (£ ))—1(21/4 - l ) ^ / 2- “ -4 oo as £ -4 0+.
triangle inequality \\xa ~ 9m\\P < \\xa ~ Xo\\p + ||XO - 9m\\p < V1/p + V»
which can be made arbitrarily small.
4 8 . Since l/l ± / > 0 it follows that |T(/)| < |T(|/|)| and so ||T(/)||g <
||T(|/|)||g. For the sake of argument supposethat T isunbounded and let
{pn} C L ^ R ) be such that ||<?n ||p = 1 and||T(<7n)||9> n2n. Now, the
sequence { / n} with fn = \gn\, all n, satisfies / „ > 0, ||/n ||p = ||5n||p = 1,
and n 2” < ||T(<?n)||g < ||T(|5n|)||9 = ||T(/n)||,. Let / = E n 2 " n / n ! by
Minkowski’s inequality if 1 < p < oo and the concavity of ip(t) = tp if
0 < p < 1, / g ¿ /( R ) . Moreover, since / > 2 ~nfn for all n, T(f ) >
2 ~nT(fn) > 0 for all n and so ||T(/)||9 > n2n2- n = n for all n. Thus,
although / G U>{R ), T ( / ) i Lq{R ).
49. g is integrable provided q < p < oo, and h is integrable for any
p > 1 such that rj/ 2 < p < oo.
294
15. IP Spaces
f / r\f\1/f}
=pL wrUo ^ ix) d» = jr -J x r « » * .
The statement remains true if all the inequalities are reversed.
53. In the case of theIP spaces the conclusion follows at once from
Holder’s inequality. Indeed, \\f\\; = Jx \f\m>Hi-v)i dp < ||/||jp In
fact, the function $ ( r ) = In(fx \f\r dp) is convex in the interval [p, q]. Note
that the conclusion also holds for q = oo: If p < r < oo, ||/||^ < ||/||^p||/||p
and ll/Hr < ||/||»’?||/||$ with rj = p/r.
The result is also true for the weak IP spaces. In this case with Mr
the weak-Lr ( X ) norm of / for r = p, q, by assumption p({|/| > A }) <
m in(M pA p, MqX~ q) and, consequently,
pi fO
<rMp Ar _ 1A~pdt + rMg j y - l ^ - q d\
r-p r-q
V
= rM ,p ------- V v M q ------
r —p q —r
Pickingf] so that the summands are equal it turns out that Mprf p =
Mqrf~q and so p = (Mq/Mp)l^q- p\ which yields, since r = pp + (1 - p)q,
ll/llr < Cp,q,r M£/r M g(1-7?)/r with Cptq>r - > o o a s r - > p o r r - » q .
54. By Holder’s inequality with 1 /p + 1 /q = 1 and p > 1,
I [ f(x)dx I
1^<5(0,2«+! )\Q(o,2«) I
H/lloo P-(X) < oo and so L°°(X) C LP(X), which is not the case. A s for the
sufficiency, if p(X) = oo, Xx(x) G L°°(X) \ IP(X).
5 9 . By Holder’s inequality Jx \f\pdp < (fx \f\qdp)p/ q - Jx \f\pdp, and
so by the case of equality in Holder’s inequality |/|p and 1 are multiples of
each other and, consequently, |/| is constant p-a.e.
LP{X) spaces are all equal iff there exist 0 < e < k < oo such
6 0 . The
that e < p(A) < k for every 0 7- A e M and T — {A c X : p(A) > 0 }
contains at most finitely many pairwise disjoint sets.
If the spaces are equal, by Problems 57 and 58, X does not contain
sets of arbitrarily small or large finite measure and so e,k exist. For the
sake of argument suppose that {An} are infinitely many pairwise disjoint
sets in T\ if p < q pick 1 /q < a < l/p, and let / = E ran_QX 4n- Then
lx l / N M = T,nn~aqIxXAndp < k tlnn~aq < 00 and / € Lq(X); how
ever» lx l / l p <*M = E n n _ “ M A i ) > £ E n n~ap = 00 and / £ D>(X).
Conversely, suppose that / is measurable and let An = {2 n < |/| <
2№+1} , n = 0, ± 1, ± 2 , ___ Since the An are pairwise disjoint I — {n :
p(An) > 0} is finite and, consequently, E n e x 2nr> ( A n) < k E nex 2” r < 00
for all r > 0. Thus by Problem 5(b), / G Lr(X) and the LP(X) spaces are
all equal.
||/||p < S (1 + ^ ( p ) ) 1^ < <5(1 + \l/(p)) and if q is such that \P(?) > 6 / ( 1 —<5),
it follows that ||/||p < 'F(p) for p > q.
—> oo as p —> oo. Let t be such that
It remains to verify that ||/||p
<p~l(t) = > M on [0,i] and (<p~l (x))p > Mp on
then ^(ip_ 1 (x))
[0,f]. Therefore \\f\\p > tl/pM and so liminfp^oo ||/||p > M.
(b) The statement is true for p finite, but not for p = oo: The function
X[o, 1/2] e L°°(I) cannot be approximated uniformly by continuous functions
in [0,1], ||x[o,i/2] — (l/2)x/||oo = 1 /2 and this is the best one can do.
6 4 . (a) If A(f) = 0, p({|/| > A}) > 0 for all A and ||/||oo = oo.
(b) If A(f) ^ 0 it readily follows that ||/||oo = inf A(f) and, therefore,
there are a sequence {An} C A(f) that decreases to ||/||oo and {Bn} c M
with p(B%) = 0 such that \f(x)\ < An for x £ Bn. Let B = f ] n Bn- then
B £ M and p(Bc) < ^ n p(i?£) = 0. Now, for x £ B we have |/(x)| < An
for all n and, therefore, letting n o o , |/(aOI < ||/||oo- Since this estimate
holds for x £ B, that is, p-a.e., ||/||oo € A(f).
66. First, let ess inf / = 0. Then p ( { / > A}) > 0 for every A > 0 and,
consequently, p ( { l / / < /3}) > 0 for every 0 < ¡3 < oo. Thus ess s u p ( l //) =
oo and the conclusion holds in this case.
298 15. Lp Spaces
Next, suppose that ess inf / > 0. Then there exists A > 0 such that
p({f < A}) = 0. Hence ess inf / = sup{A > 0 : p({f < A }) = 0 } =
s u p { l /£ : p({f < 1 //? }) = 0 } = s u p {l//3 : p ( { l / f > 0 }) = 0 } =
(inf{ 0 : p ( { l /f > /3 }) = 0 } ) - 1 = 1/ess s u p ( l //) .
6 7 . (a) implies (b) Recall that by Problem 2.62 if a nonatomic measure
assumes a positive finite value, it assumes an infinite number of distinct
values. Thus p is purely atomic and since atoms are pairwise disjoint, there
are finitely many of them, X i , . . . , Xn, say, such that p(X \ (J£=1 X^) — 0
and p(Xk D Xm) = 0 for k ^ m. Next, let / be a measurable function and
A an atom of X. Then /\a is measurable and, consequently, the limit of a
sequence of simple functions { / n} , say, defined on A. Since A is an atom,
the fn are constant on A except possibly on a set Bn) say, of measure 0; let
B = |Jn Bn. Then / is constant on A\B since, if x, y G A\B, fn(x) = fn(y)
for all n and so f(x) = limn / n(a;) = l i m „ /n(y) = f(y). Therefore every
measurable / : (X,M) (R, H(M)) is equal p-&.e. to a linear combination
of the xXmi 1 < m < n, and L°°{X) is finite dimensional.
(b) implies (c) A finite-dimensional linear space is separable.
(c) implies (a) For the sake of argument suppose that {Xn} is a countable
pairwise disjoint collection of measurable subsets of X with positive measure.
For A = {An} G { 0 , 1 } N, let £(X) = Z n*nXxn\ since the X n are pairwise
disjoint £(X) is well-defined and ¿(A) G L°°(X). Now, if A ^ p, we claim
that ||^(A) — ¿(/ijHoo = 1. Indeed, ||^(A) — £(/i)||oo < 1 and if n is such that
An 7k Mn, then, since p{Xn) > 0, ||£(A) - £(p)\\oo > ||xx„||oo = 1- Finally,
observe that the balls H ( ^ ( A ) ,l/2 ) with A G { 0 , 1 } ^ form an uncountable
family of open pairwise disjoint subsets of L°°(X), which is not possible
since L°°(X) is separable.
(a) iff (d) Recall that if (a) holds the measurable functions on X are
simple and, therefore, p- a.e. bounded and (d) holds. Conversely, if (a)
doesn’t hold there exists a sequence { A n} consisting of pairwise disjoint
sets in M of positive measure. The function J2nnXxn is then measurable
and unbounded and, consequently, (d) is false.
7 5 . If p =
r the conclusion follows at once from the L D C T . For p/r > 1,
piAnY/P- 1 fAn If\rdp < p(Any/P-YfAn \f\pdpy/Pp(Any-r/P, by Holder’s
inequality, which goes to 0 as n -4 oo.
8 1 . Take f(t ) = £X[o,a](0 + 2/X[a,i ](^)- Then the left-hand side becomes
<p(Xx + (1 — A)y) and the right-hand side becomes A<p(x) + (1 — \)<p{y). Thus
ip is convex. Similarly for ip.
82. Equality clearly holds if /is constant p- a.e. on X. Conversely,
if equality holds for ip it holds for —ip and so we may assume that p
is increasing. The case when ip' is increasing or decreasing is handled
analogously and we consider the former. Let a = Jx f dp and ip(t) =
<p(t) — p(a) —(p'(ot){t — a ); then ip(a) = 0 and ip'(t) = ip'(t) —<p'(a) = 0
iff t = a. W e claim that ip(t) does not change sign and in this case is
strictly positive for t / a. If t > a , by the mean value theorem there exists
a < s < t such that
-✓ ( .) > ✓ (« )
83. By calculus\tp - sp| < p\t — s| (tp_1 + sp_1), s,t > 0. Hence
putting s = |<?(a;)|, t = \f(x)\, and integrating, by Holder’s inequality and
Solutions 301
Minkowski’s inequality,
( I I F* w ) ^ z Y d Fk{x)= m d t’
fc=l fc=l J0 k=l
and, therefore, by Problem 86
JT«-(nikw)'/,*s(I£
J0 k =1
7 )'jr^(sEA(<*'-
k=l
302 15. LP Spaces
l l / l i r 1 I x 9 pfdp.
92. The result is true for 1 < p < 00 by the case of equality in
Holder’s inequality. p = 1. Indeed, if f(x) =
The result is not true for
2X[o,i / 2](*). then for any 0 with |a| < ! . p(®) = X[o,i/2](®) + a X (i/ 2,i](*)
satisfies ||^|joo = 1 and Jjf(x)g(x)dx = 1 = ||/||i. Nor is it true for
p = 00. f(x) = x, H/lloo = 1, and g any integrable function of
Let
norm 1. Then by the L D C T , JjQ1_ 1^n] \g(x)\dx > 1 /2 for some integer n.
Hence I fj f(x)g(x) dx| < (1 - 1 /n ) / [0>i - i / n] |»(*)| dx + / [ i _ 1/nii] |p(®)| dx <
fj |g(x)| dx - ( 1/n ) Jj0 !_ ! /„ ] |p| < 1 — l / ( 2n) < 1, and no such g exists in
this case.
X has finite measure, L°°(X) c Lr(X) for 0 < r < oo, and
1 0 1 . Since
so we may assume that r < oo. Now, for / € Lr(X), /¿({|/| = oo}) = 0,
and m a x (l, \f(x)\r) is a /x-a.e. integrable majorant for \f(x)\p for 0 < p < r.
Moreover, since liny^H - \f(x)\p = X{f¿o}(x) p-a.e., by the L D C T it follows
that limp^ 0+ f x If\PdP = fx X {/^ o } dp = p({f + 0 }).
102. Recall that by calculus ln(í) < t - 1 for t > 0 and <p(p) — (tp- 1 ) /p
decreases to ln(i) for t > 0 as p 0+ . Now, since |ln(/)| and |/|r are finite
¿x-a.e. X, 0 < / < oo p-a.e. in X and ( f(x)p - 1)/ p - In(f(x)) >
in
0 decreases pointwise to 0 p-a..e. in X and has an integrable majorant
{f(x)r - 1)/r - l n ( /( x ) ) . Then by Problem 6.102,
hm / -------- - d p = [ l n ( /) dp ,
p->o+ Jx p Jx
and F is right-differentiable at the origin with derivative fx In( / ) dp.
Now, by calculustp\ln(i)| < c(ts + tr), s < p < r , t > 0. Thus for each
fixed x G X where f(x) ^ 0, f(x)p has derivative f(x)pln(f(x)), which,
by the above remark, is integrable. And, since f p(x)(f(x)r p — l ) / r — p is
integrable, f p(x)(f(x)£ — l)/s — f p(x) l n ( /( x ) ) > 0 decreases pointwise to
0 ¿i-a.e. in X as e —*• 0+ and the expression is integrable for e = p — r.
Therefore, by Problem 6.102,
l„(||/||p) =
p
304 15. LP Spaces
hm indl/Hp) = lim
\ak\P[¿(Ale)
]Cfc=l ln (lafc|)
»0+
p— »0+
p— Yk=l\ak\PKAk)
= KAk)
¿ l n ( | a fe| ) / x ( A fc) = f ln ( |/ |) d / x .
Yn
k=^(Ak) fc=i Jx
Therefore, exponentiating, lim?,^.o+ II/IIp = exP(fx ln (I/ 1) dp).
1 0 4 . W ith F as in Problem 102 we have
1 1 0 . No.
(1 A)p(^fx f dpj
/• * ({ / > xj^fdpjY >
J x f pdp
1 1 6 . For all 0 < p, q < oo. First, suppose that 0 < p, q < oo, and since
the argument is symmetric, that 0 < p < q. Then [f(x) g(x)]p/2 > l and
integrating over X, by the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality,
and, consequently,
(b) For 0 < M U < oo, the expression for ¡|g||g follows from the case of
equality in (a). And, by the case of equality in Holder’s inequality, equality
a,(\f\p\g\p)1/p = 6(|p|p)r , or a\fg\ = b\g\q p-&.e. on X for some
holds in (a) iff
a, b > 0. Since 0 < |<j| < oo /x-a.e. on X this is equivalent to a\f\ = &|g|9 -1
or ap|/|p = 6p|p|p(9- 1) = b»\g\q p-a.e. on X.
complete the proof we may also assume that / G L°°(X). Now, for / G
U{X) n L ° ° ( X ) and p > r, \\f\\p = fx \f\P~r \f\r dp < Hfl\£r fx ¡flrdM =
| | /| | §n /| | ; < oo. Hence ||/||p < ||/||»r/p ||/||r/p and letting p oo it
readily follows that lim su p p ^^ ||/||p < ||/||oo-
Finally, if ||/||p = oo for all p it does not follow that ||/||oo = oo. To see
this take the Lebesgue measure on M and / = 1. Then ||/||p = oo for all p
yet H/lloo = 1.
124. Note that since / is nonzero on a set of positive measure, 0<
0Cn < ll/llill/IIS r1 < oo for all n. Now, since |/|" = |/|(n- 1) /2|/|(n+ 1) /2,
by Cauchy-Schwarz it readily follows that an < and, conse
quently,an/an-1 < ocn+i/an. Thus the nonnegative sequence in question
is nondecreasing and the limit exists. Moreover, an+1 < a n ||/||oo and so
limn o;n+i / a n < H/lloo-
W e claim that the limit is||/||oo- Assume first that p{X) — 1. Then
by Holder’s inequality with indices p = 1 + 1 /n and its conjugate q =
n + 1 , otnWfWn = (Ix \f\ndtJ')1+1/n ^ Ix\f\n+1 (1 lJ' = and> conse
quently, ||/||n < an+i/an. Thus taking limits, by Problem 123, ||/||oo <
limn an+i/an.
Alternatively, there is a proof that does not use Problem 123. Since
ll/lloo > £ > 0, let A C X with p{A) > 0 be such that |/(æ)| > ||/||oo — £ for
x € A. Then a n+i > fA |/|n+1d/x > (ll/lloo- e ) (n+1)/u(A) and so an+i / a n >
(ll/lloo -e)(p(A)/M( X ) y / ( ^ ) . Now,
and so limn an+\/an > ||/||oo — £> and, since e > 0 is arbitrary, the result
follows. This second proof is of interest because the conclusion of Problem
123 follows from this result by general considerations: If limn an+i/an = L,
then limn al/n = L.
Next, in the general case let
dV = Î T C ^ = J n = I , 2, —
Then an = ||/||i /3n-i for all n > 1 and by the finite measure case an+i/an
= Pn/Pn-I - * ll/lloo,V Now, let A\ = {|/| > A}. Note that if p(A\) = 0,
then v(A\) = H /llr1 JAx |/| dp, = 0, and, if v(A\) = 0, by Chebychev’s
inequality Xp(Ax) < v{A\) = 0 and p{A\) = 0. Therefore ||/||oo = ll/lloo,!/
and limn a n+i/o :n = ||/||oo-
308 15. LP Spaces
125. (a) W ith the same notation for an as in Problem 124 we have that
an n -> ||/||oo* Thus, with f there replaced, by e*^, it follows that
b\m\)1/v _
7 1/чс1/»к fc jfefc
<
17 / A!
* V 4 '
i - e . , ( E n / n ) 1/ p < £ n / n -
129. t e l , \Tf(t)\ < tl/q\\f\\p, 1/p +
(a) By Holder’s inequality, for
1/q = 1. Thus ||T(/)||P < (fo tp/q dt)l/p\\f\\p and Г is a contraction with
c = ( l / p ) 1/p.
(b) For / = X/, ||T(/)||oo = ll/llco- Now, from \T(f)(t)\ < i Ц/Ц00 it
follows that T 2 (f)(t) < (t2/2 ) Ц/Ц00 and so ||T2(/)||oo < (1 /2 ) ||/||<x>-
(c) First, ||T(/)||i < ||/||i and the bound is sharp. Indeed, let / n(s) =
nx[o,i/n](s). Then T(fn)(t) = ll/nlli for all t > 1/n and, consequently,
||T(/n)||i > (1 — 1/п)||/п||ь which, since true for all n, gives that T is not
Solutions 309
a contraction. Moreover, since ||T(/)||i < ||/||i, T 2( / ) ( i ) < i||/||i and so,
l|r2(/)||, < (1/2)11/11!. Thus ||T“ + '( / ) l l i < l|T“ (/)||, < (1 /2 )* H/lli and
T'(j) -> 0 in LHl).
1 3 0 . True for 1 < p < oo, not true for p = oo.
1 3 2 . First assume that p < q. Recall that by Problem 131, ||x||9 < ||x||p.
For the sake of argument suppose that (ip, ||•||9) is complete; since (£p, ||•||p)
is complete, by the inverse mapping theorem ||x||p < c||æ||9 for some constant
c. Now, if x is the sequence whose first n terms are equal to 1 and are equal
nl!p < cnliq, which does not hold for n large
to 0 otherwise, it follows that
enough. The case q < p follows analogously.
133. Fix n and consider X)fc=i Am ong all sums with n in
tegers in the denominator, is the largest (smallest denomina
tors) and, therefore, 1 /V (^ ) < 1/k. Now, by the Cauchy-
Xjü=i
Schwarz inequality, Y^=i 1/& < ( E £ = i fP(^)/^2 ) 1 ^Œ,k=i lyV(fc))1/ 2 which
in turn is bounded by (E fc=i ¥?( ^ ) /^ 2) 1^2(Z)fc=i 1/A:)1^2, and so X)fc=i 1 A <
E L i m / k 2.
1 3 4 . a is e1 ne2.
1 3 6 . Let s = p/r\ by assumption 1 < s < 2 and so its conjugate s' > 2.
Then J2n læn|r = É n n - 1 / Sn 1/ S|æn |r < ( E n n læn r S) 1/s( E n n_S,/S) 1/S,> ^
since rs = p and s'/s > 1, we have finished.
for every y G C\tN> there exists ym, 1 < m < M, such that \\y —ym\\p =
^2n=i \Vn ~ y%\p < ep/2 . Now let x 1, . . . , xM € ip be defined as follows:
Now, given x G C\tN> pick xm, 1 < m < M, such that Y^n=i \xn—x™|p <
ep/2 , and observe that ||z - xm\\p
v < Yln=i Ixn ~ x™\p + jt,n=N+1 lAn|p <
e? / 2 + ep/2 = ep.
140. The statement is false. First, observe that there is a sequence {nk}
such that Yjj^nk^ 1 f ° r afi k. Indeed, since A ^ HPit immediately follows
that for any nk G N, J2fLnkAj = 00 an<^> therefore, there exists nk+i G N
such that E n fc<j<nk+i Ap > 1. Starting with n\ = 1 we can find a sequence
{rife} in N with the required property.
Next, we claim there is a sequence {xk} in M\ such that \\xm —a;n ||p =
2 1/ p if m ± n. Indeed, with {nk} as above, let
0k=( E Ai)~1/P’
nk<j<nk+l
k=l,2,....
Hence 0 < < 1 for all k and xk defined by
A j, 7lk ^ j nk+i ,
0, otherwise,
belong to C\ and have norm 1 and, consequently, are in M\. Finally, since
\\xm — xn ||p = 2 l/p if m 7^ n, M\ is not compact.
Note that since C\ and B are closed, M\ is closed.
141. First, pick an increasing sequence {nk} such that bnk > 2k for all
k. Now, let On = l/2k for n = nk and on = 0 otherwise.
{nk}, n\ = 1, such that
Next, pick an increasing sequence cj >
k2, and define dj = 1 /k when nk < j < nk+i-
1 4 3 . For the sake of argument suppose that a £ iq and let —> oo be
chosen so that n i = 1, and we = Y^ne<k<ne+i lafcl9 — ^ f ° r ^ > 1- Note
that if x is defined by
^ n _ i 1/ n » A: = 1 , . . . ,n 2,
t v jU \
10, otherwise.
Then ||xn ||i = X f i i ( l / n ) = n, \\xn \\2 = (X f e li 1/n 2 ) 1/2 = 1, and ||xn ||oo =
1 /n .
147. Ap is not closed for 1 < p < oo. On the other hand, A\ is the
kernel of a bounded linear functional on £} and so A\ is closed.
1 4 8 . Let Fn = {x € £q : xn ^ 0 and xn = 0 for all n > N }; by definition
£g = UNFjy- Thus it suffices to prove that each Fn is nowhere dense in
£l First, the Fn are finite dimensional and, hence, closed in £q. Next, let
x e Fn and r > 0. Then y = (a q , .. .,x N, r / 2 , 0 , . . . ) € £ ||y - x||p = r /2 ,
y G B(x, r), and y Fn , and this is true for every N and every r > 0. Thus
Fn has no interior points.
Mn = { / € LP{I) : Jj \f(x)\pdx < n }; by Fatou’s lemma Mn
1 4 9 . Let
is closed in Ll{I). Let g € Ll(I) \ IF(I). Then for / G Mn and all R > 0,
the iJ -b a ll B(f, R) contains / + eg for e < R and B(f, R) 0 ^ 0. Thus
Mn has empty interior in Ll{I) and IP {I) = (JnMn is of first category in
L\I).
1 5 0 . First note that (Y, || • ||i) is a Banach space. For each n > 1, let
yn = { / G YD L 1 + 1 / n(X) : ||/||i+ i/n 5: n}. Now, if / G Y, let p > 1 be such
that / G LP(X) and n such that 1 + 1/n < p. Then by Holder’s inequality
ll/lli+ i/n < (1 + fJ,(X))i~'1 /p\\f\\p, and, therefore, / G Yn for n sufficiently
large. Thus Y = (Jn Yn-
W e claim that Yn is closed in Y for all n. To see this fix n and let
{fk} C Yn converge to / in Y. Passing to a subsequence if necessary we
may assume that lim kfk = / ¿¿-a.e. and, therefore, by Fatou’s lemma,
312 15. IX Spaces
I K / — f n ) X K e \\p < e / 2 M for all 1 < t < M and all k large enough. Hence
d(f, fn) < M(e/2M) + e/2 = e for n large enough and limn d(f, fn) = 0.
c (Lp0C(X),d) is a Cauchy sequence, then
Finally, completeness. If { / n}
{fn \K m } Lp{Km) for all m , and, therefore, { / n|icm} converges
is Cauchy in
to 4>m, say, in U‘(Km) for each m . Now, Km c Kmi for m < m', and
limn JKm | - fn(x)\pdx < limn fK^ \4>m'(x) - fn(x)\pdx = 0; thus
by the uniqueness of limits in LP(Km), <t>m'\Km = <Pm- Then the function
/ : O -> M given by f\i<m = 4>mis well-defined and since f x K m €
for all m , / € Lfoc( 0 ) , and by construction limn ||(/ - f n ) X K m ||P = 0 for all
m , and so limn d ( f , f n ) = 0.
Lc(O) C Ltfoc(0). Now, given / € Lp
(b) Clearly loc{0) and e > 0, let M
be such that < £- Then fXKM e L ? ( 0 ) and d(f,fxK M) < e -
Note that for 1 < p < oo, one can prove in an analogous fashion that
Lfoc(X) is separable, because the LP(Km) are.
Chapter 16
Sequences of Functions
Solutions
315
316 16. Sequences o f Functions
9 . W e may assume that the fn are measurable and in that case M(x)
need not be measurable. On the other hand, if M{x) is measurable, the
conclusion follows for arbitrary / n, measurable or not.
0 < k < 2n, that is to say, in a set of measure 0. Now, the values M < 1 are
excluded but for any M > 1 we have p({supm |/m(a;)| < M }) = 1 > (1 — e)
for any e > 0.
11. For the sake of argument suppose that a subsequence {gnk} of {gn}
converges pointwise on a subset of I of measure 1. Then by Egorov’s theorem
there is a measurable A C I with |A| > 1/2 + rj where {gnk} converges
uniformly and pick k sufficiently large so that \gnk(x) — <7nfe+i(®)| < 1 for
all x e A. Now, \fnk(x) —fnk+1 (x)\ = 1 on a subset of I of measure 1/ 2
and, therefore, by assumption \gnk(x) — gnk+1 (x)\ — 1 on a subset F of I of
measure at least 1/ 2 — 77; thus \A\ + |F| > 1 and so \A n F| > 0, which is
impossible.
13. Yes.
14. Let An = {fn 7^ An}; by Borel-Cantelli ¿x(limsupn An) = 0. There
fore fn(x) = An for all n > nXi where nx depends on x for /x-a.e. x € X.
Now, since converges, Yn fn(x) converges for such x, that is to say,
¿i-a.e.
15. First, by Chebychev’s inequality An^ ({|/ n - Jx fndfx\ > An}) <
fx Ifn~Ix I ^ ^ c. Hence S n M({| f n ~ f x fndfi\ > An}) < X^n^c/ ^ n ^
00 and the conclusion follows from Borel-Cantelli.
16. Necessity first. For the sake of argument suppose fi({fn > M))
= 00 for all M > 0. Then by the second Borel-Cantelli lemma, Problem
2. 108, ¿¿(limsupn An) = 1 for every M > 0, i.e., limsupn / n > M /x-a.e. for
every M > 0, which implies that limsupn / n = 00 ¡i-a.e., which is not the
case.
Sufficiency next. Let An = {fn > M }; by Borel-Cantelli /n(limsupn An)
= 0 and, consequently, fn(x) < M for n > nx /i-a.e. Whence supnfn(x) <
ma,xi<k<nx fk{x) + M < 00 ju-a.e.
17. Let c > 0. Then ¿¿({ln(/n) > cln(n)}) = ¿¿({/n > nc}) = n-5c and
by the first and second Borel-Cantelli lemmas,
0, if 5c > 1,
¿ i(lim su p {ln (/n) > c ln (n )}) =
n 1, if 5c < 1.
if D n P n < 0 0,
¿i(lim su p {|/n|
n otherwise.
20. Since each fn is finite ¿t-a.e. and fi(X) < oo there are constants
bn such that if An = {|/n| < 6n} , ¡i{X \ An) < 2 ~n and, consequently, by
Borel-Cantelli, ^(limsupn(X \ An)) = 0. The good set is A = lim infn A n;
then X \ A = lim supn(X \ An) and, consequently, /i(X \ A) = 0. Now, let
An = 1/nbn; we claim that limn An/ n(x) = 0 for x € A. Indeed, if x € A,
x belongs to all but finitely many An and x e An if n > N\ > 0. Thus
\fn(x)\ < bn, which means that An|/n(x)| < (l/nbn)bn = 1/n and so if
n > N2 > N1 > 0, limn An|/n(x)| = 0 on A, which by the above argument
holds /i-a.e.
2 1 . Redefining the fn on a set of measure 0 if necessary we may assume
that the fn are finite everywhere and limnfn(x) = 0 for every x € X. Let
gn(x) = supfc>n / n(x), x 6 X ; the gn are measurable, gn{x) > fn(x) for all
x (E X and n, gn(x) > gn+i(x), and limn gn(x) = 0. So, working with {gn}
instead we may assume that the original sequence decreases to 0 everywhere.
We define the An first. Let ni = 1 and note that since f n —1 0 in measure
there is a subsequence { / njJ of { / n} such that ¿¿({/nfc > 1/A;2}) < l / 2 fc for
k = 2, 3, — The sequence A is defined in blocks as follows: An = k for
rik < n < n,k+1, k = 1 , 2 , . . . ; in other words, the first n2 - n\ terms of A
are 1, the next nz —n2 terms are 2, and so on. Moreover, since -»• 00 as
k ->■ 00, limn An = 00.
Next, we deal with the convergence of {An/n}. Let
OO
Bm = | J {A n /n > 1 / m } , m = 1,2 , —
n-n-m
OO Tlfc+l-l
Bm = U U > 1/ m}
k=m n=nk
2 3 . (b) The ¿x-a.e. convergence is a particular case of (a) and if ¡jl(X) <
00 the convergence in measure follows from Problem 22. Otherwise, given
£ > 0, pick m such that Xn < e for all n > m . Then u ({su p „> ~ | /n| > e }) <
M i r = m(l/n| > An}) < £ ~ m M{|/n| > An}). So, since
OO
K“
m ‘
M (l/n l > An}) = 0,
n—m
n\ < ri2 < ... < rik-i with the property that fj.{{fnj > 1/j}) < 1 / j 2 for
1 < j < k, pick nk > nk- 1 SO that y{{fnk > l/k}) < l/k2. W e claim
that limnfc fnk = 0 //- a.e. Let Bk = {fnk > l/k} and B = limsupfc Bk\ by
construction Ylkn{Bk) < oo, and so by Borel-Cantelli y{B) = 0. Finally, it
remains to verify that limnfc fnk = 0 / / - a.e. on X \B. Now, if x € X \ B,
x Bk for all k > k0, where ko depends on x. In other words, / nfc(x) < 1/A:,
all k > k0 and, consequently, fnk(x) / ( « ) for x outside a set B with
,x{B) = 0.
(b) No.
(c) By (a) a subsequence { / nfc} of { / n} converges to / //-a.e. and since
{ /n } is increasing, the whole sequence converges pointwise //-a.e. and the
M C T does the rest.
2 9 . For the sake of argument suppose that there exist rj > 0 and nk oo
such that \fnk(x) - f(x) | > V- Now, fnk{x) - f{x) > v or fix) - fnk{x) > ri
for infinitely many nk\ suppose the former holds. Two more observations:
passing to a subsequence if necessary we may assume that {fnk} converges
to / //-a .e ., and, since / is continuous at x , we may pick 8 > 0 such that
If(x) ~ f{y) I < v/2 for \x ~ y\ < Finally, write fnk(y) - f(y) = fnk{y) ~
/» * ( * ) + fnk(x ) - f(x ) + f{x) - fiy) and note that for y in ( x,x + 8 ),
fnk(y) ~ fnk{x) > 0. Thus fnk(y ) - fiy) > ( /„ „ (x) - fix)) + ifix) - fiy)) >
T] - v / 2 and, consequently, {z € I : \fnk(z) - f(z)\ > v/ty 3 ( x ,x + <5).
Therefore \{z £ I : \fnk(z) —f(z)\ > y / 2}| > 8 > 0 for all nk, which cannot
happen since fn ->■ / in measure.
3 5 . For the sake of argument suppose that such a metric p exists. Now,
by Problem 2.62(c) for each n there exist pairwise disjoint measurable sub
sets { A£ } C X, k = 1 , . . . ,n , such that X = (J£=i A* and p(A%) = p(A)/n
fork = 1 , . . . ,n . Then the sequence {fm} consisting of the characteristic
functions of these sets, ordered first by the level n and then by k, converges
to 0 in measure yet tends pointwise to 0 only possibly in a set of measure 0.
Then p{fmi 0) 0 and, consequently, there exist e > 0 and a subsequence
{frnk} of {fm} such that p(fmk, 0) > £ for all k > 1. Now, since {fmk}
tends to 0 in measure by Problem 27(a) a further subsequence {fmkj} ° f
{ f m k} converges to 0 ¿¿-a.e. This contradicts the inequality p (/m fc.>0) ^ e
for j > 1.
d and d\ follow along similar lines we do d.
3 6 . (a) Since the proofs for
Clearly d(f,g) > 0 and if d(f,g) = 0, then |/ - g\/(l + \f - ^|) = 0 /¿-a.e.,
and so / - g = 0 ¿¿-a.e. and / = g in T.
Next, i / ( l + 1 ) increases for t > 0 and so
and, consequently, integrating, d(f —g) < d(f —h) + d(h —g).
322 16. Sequences o f Functions
(b) The statement is false. For the sake of argument assume that
(C(I),d) is complete and consider the sequence
n2 x, 0 < x < 1 /n ,
fn
1 /x , 1 /n < X < 1.
37. (a) implies (b) Let limn f n = 0 in probability and (p be as in (a). For
the sake of argument suppose there exist rj > 0 and a subsequence {fn k} of
{ f n} such that Jx <p(fnk) dfi>rj for all nk. Now, limnfc f nie = 0 in probability
and by Problem 27(a), passing to a subsequence if needed we may assume
that limnfc f nk = 0 /i-a.e. Hence by (a), limnfc fx <p(fnk) dp = 0, which is not
Solutions 323
the case since fx <p(fnk) dfx > V- Therefore limn fx <p(fn) d/x = 0 and by (a),
/n ~t 0 /¿-a.e.
(b) implies (a) If limn / n = 0 /¿-a.e., then limn / n = 0 in probability,
which by Problem 36 is equivalent to the convergence of { / n} to 0 in ip
for (p(x) = |ar|/(1 + |x|) or (p = m in (l, |x|). Conversely, by Chebychev’s
inequality, if { / n} converges to 0 in <p, then limn fn = 0 in probability and,
therefore, by (b), limn / n = 0 /¿-a.e.
(b) implies (c) For the sake of argument suppose there is a measurable
A c X with /¿(A) > 0 that contains no atoms. Then, contrary to (b), the
sequence { / m} constructed in Problem 35 tends to 0 in probability but not
/¿-a.e. in A. Thus fx is a purely atomic finite measure with at most countably
many atoms.
(c) implies (b) As noted in Problem 5.67, if the are the atoms of
X, measurable functions on X are /¿-a.e. equal to a linear combination of
the functions { x x fc}- Therefore limn / n = 0 in probability implies that if
fn = 12k ^kXxk, limn = 0 for all k, and, consequently, limn / „ = 0 /¿-a.e.
—> oo along which the liminf is assumed, i.e., limnfc fx fnk dfx
3 8 . Pick nfc
= lim infn fx
fn dfx. Since limnfc fnk = f in measure, passing to a sub
sequence if necessary we may assume that limn/c fnk = / /¿-a.e. Then
lim infnfc fnk = / and by Fatou’s lemma Jx f dfx < lim infnfc J fnk dfi. More
over, since this last liminf is actually taken along a convergent sequence, it
equals the limit. Specifically, j x f dfi < lim infn fx fn dfi.
3 9 . By Problem 27(a) a subsequence {fnk} ° f {fn} converges to / fx-
a.e. and, consequently, \f\<<p /¿-a.e. Now, given e > 0, fx \fn — f\ d/x <
f{\f«~f\>*p} Mn ~ f \ d^ + /{ | /« -/| < « ? } \fn~ f\d/x = I + J, say. First, J <
e Jx <pdfx. Next, given rj > 0, observe that
Now, first pick e so that J is arbitrarily small and then 77 > 0 such that
2 ‘Pd/x is as small as desired. Finally, since fn —> f in measure,
limn /¿({| /n — /| > £1]}) = 0 and, therefore, by the L D C T the first inte
gral bounding / goes to 0.
A s for the example, consider fn = nx[o,i/n] and / = 0 in [0,1]. Or
fn = (l/n)x[o,n]> / = 0. And it is not necessary to check that <p is not
integrable because, if it was, convergence would follow and it does not.
324 16. Sequences o f Functions
4 2 . By Fatou’s lemma / 6 Ll(X). Next, observe that g+fn > 0 ,g—fn >
0 and so, by Problem 38,
5 0 . Suppose that /x(lim supn An) = 0; then fj,-a.e. every point belongs to
at most finitely many of the An. Thus limn XAnf = 0 ¿x-a.e., xa „ l /l ^ l /l e
L 1( X ) , and the conclusion follows by the L D C T . A similar argument gives
that the conclusion holds if limn i¿(An) = 0. Alternatively, by the absolute
continuity of the integral of / , given e
> 0, there exists 8 > 0 such that if A is
measurable with f¿(A) < 8 , then |fA / dfi| < e. Now, since limn /i(An) = 0,
there is an N such that pi{An) < 8 for n > N and so |fA f dfj,| < e for all
n > N.
fn ->0 a.e. and 0 < fn{x)X[o,N](x) < </?(«)X[o ,N](X), 1 < N <
5 1 . Since
oo, and <pis locally integrable in [0, oo), by the L D C T , limn / n(x) dx = 0
for any fixed N. Suppose now that Anfl [N, oo) has positive measure. Then,
since An < in fz e ^ n ^ o o ) ^{x) and decreases, this inf is bounded in turn
by
< (p(N)N -A 0 as N -¥ o o .
Solutions 327
The proof can now be finished in one stroke. Given e > 0, pick N so large
that f™ fn(x) dx < e / 2 and then pick no such that Jj0 ^ fn(x) dx < e/ 2 for
n > no- Then J0°° fn{x) dx < e for n > no-
54. fn —> 0 a.e. and fI fn{x)dx = l /l n ( n ) —> 0. Now, any
Clearly
majorant p must verify p(x) > X)^L2(n /ln ((n ))) X(i/(n+i),i/n)(® ) and so,
by the M C T ,
F (0 )-F (x )
X
£ ( H F “ N = [S/x).
n n=l
Now, since the right-hand derivative ofF exists at the origin, the left-hand
side above is bounded by M , say, for x > 0 sufficiently small. Therefore,
for all such x > 0, J2n-i™n < 2M , N — [8 /x]. Finally, since the right-
hand side above is independent of x and N -»• oo as x —> 0, it follows that
E n nan < oo-
63. Ir+ f ( x) dx = E “ = o (° + nb)~2-
65. fn(x) = (1 —•y/sin(z))n cos(x), x G [0, tt/2 ]; fn(x) is nonnegative,
Let
measurable, and E ^ L o fn{x) = cos(x)/-y/sin (x). Then, by the M C T ,
Ca _ 1 7T
f/0 ____ Wt — ________
i + x sin(7ra) *
f°° f°° x2 ir
lim / fn(z) dx = I —r - — — —7 dx =
n Jo x4 + x2 + 1 2y/3'
72. Since lim^-).oo(sin(|a:|/A))/(|a;|/A) = 1 for x ^ 0, the integrand
above as well as the limit are dominated by 1 /(1 + |x|)_ (n+1)+ a , which is
integrable since a < 1. Therefore the limit is fRn f(x)/(l + |x|)n+1 dx.
7 3 . Let fn(x) denote the integrand above. Since |sin(x'_1e*)l < 1 for
all x it is readily verified that
rl/(c o s (x ) — 2), 0 < x < 2ir,
lim fn(x) = < l/2 (c o s (x ) — 2), x = 2ir,
0, x > 2n.
sin(x 1ex)
l + xn + > x n > x¿,
4n
4 n
330 16. Sequences o f Functions
1 i _n i s in ^ -V ) ^ | s in (x -V )| ^ 1 ^ 1 3
i + 3: + 4n - 1 4n - 1 4n~1 4 ~ 4'
7 7 . The limit is 0.
78. Since sin(x) is periodic with period 2ir we may assume that 0 <
rn < 2 tt. Then
Now, since limn |sin” (x)| = 0 a.e., by the L D C T limn / 0°° e x\sin” (x)| dx =
0 and the same is true for the integral we want to estimate.
f (1 — x)2 dx _ r0 (1 - e” ) 2
du < o o .
Ji In2 (a;) x J_, u“
Next, write
n ( l — x)2 _ n( 1 — x )2 1 (1 — x)2
(1 + nx) ln2(x) (1 + nx) ln2(x) ^ x ln2(x)
Solutions 331
9 2 . (a) iff (b) First, necessity. For the sake of argument suppose there
exist 77 > 0, {fn} C J7, and {An} with fi(An) < en, en 0, such that
V < fA \fn\dfi. Let S > 0 be such that s u p fA |/| dp. < rj/2 whenever
[¿(A) < 6. Now pick 0 < en < 5 and note that since ¡J,(An) < en < 6,
rj < fA \fn\dfj, < 77/ 2, which cannot happen.
Sufficiency is immediate. Since oj(T, S) decreases to = 0 as 8 - » 0,
given e > 0, S) < e provided 6 is small enough.
(b) iff (c) W e actually prove that (¿(J7) = wfT7) and, therefore, in partic
ular, u(J7) = 0 iff (¿(J7) = 0. Note that since oj(F, e) and ¿¿(J7, R) decrease
as e -¥ 0+ and R —> 00, respectively, the limits in the definitions of lo(T)
and u(J7) coincide with the infima. Since J7 is bounded, by Chebychev’s
inequality there is a constant c such that n(Bftp) < c/R for all / € J7.
Now, given e > 0, let R be large enough so that supf < e. Then
for R sufficiently large, (¿(J7) < w (.77, R) < w p 7, e), and since e is arbitrary
u(F) < u(T).
The reverse inequality is also true. Given rj > 0, let R^ > 0 be such that
u>(F,R) < (¿(J7) + 7 7 , all R > Ry. Then for each f € J 7 and A E A4 with
¡¿(A) < e it follows that
Let p > 0 be such that supn f x \fn\pXA dp, < e /2 whenever p(A) < p.
Convergence in probability now implies that there exists no such that for
n > n0 we have /¿({|/n|p > e / 2 } ) < p. It then follows that f x \fn\p dp < e
for n > no.
(b) implies (c) It is trivial and holds in the general context of Banach
spaces.
336 16. Sequences o f Functions
(c) implies (a) For M > 1 define the function ipM •[0, oo) —»■ [0, oo) by
Mix) = { * ’
1^0, M < x < oo,
ability for all M. Hence, from the boundedness of ipM and the L D C T ,
it follows that f x i > M ( \ f n \ p )d(J, - A f x ip M (\ f\ p ) d / i . Now, by (c) and the
above remark, there exists no such that Jx \fn \p d / i — Jx \f\p d / i < e /4
and f x ip M (\f\p) d / i - f x ip M (\ fn \ p ) d /i < e /4 for n > no- Therefore for
n > n0, f x < f x \fn \p d n - Jx i p M ( \ f n \ p ) d/J, < e /2 +
\fn\p X { \ f n \p> M } d n
(c) implies (a) Let T' = { / nfc} and T" = { f ne} be subsequences of { / n}
that satisfy (c). Then, as in (a) implies (b), we get that limnfc fx f n k d/i =
= An + [ \fn\dg- [ \f\dg
Jx Jx
where by Problem 84, limn An = 0. Thus the limit in the left-hand side
of the equality exists iff the limit in the right-hand side exists and we have
lim„ Jx \fn - /| dg = limn fx \fn\dg - fx |/| dg. By Problem 99(b) (which
applies since in a finite measure space /x-a.e. convergence implies convergence
in measure), the limit in the left-hand side of the equality is (¿(T).
102. (a) The conclusion is not necessarily true unless fn G Lx(X) for
some n.
[1 /2 ,1] for n even, then 1 /2 = lim supn f} XAn(x) dx < fo lim suPn XAn(x) dx
= 1.
Finally, to see failure consider Lebesgue measure in [0,1] and fn{x) =
2n+1X[2-(»+u>2 -«](a;)- Then suPn fn(x) = is not
integrable, f f fn(x) dx = 1 for all n, and since limn / n(a:) = 0 a.e. on [0,1],
fo lim supn fn(x) dx = 0.
107. (c) First, necessity. Given e > 0, by Problem 4.123 there exist finite
measure sets An such that fAc \ fn \p d/x < e for all n. Let A = Ao U . . . U An
where Aq corresponds to / and N is large enough such that ||/n — /||P < e for
all n > N. Then /x(A) < oo and fAc |/n |p djx < e for all n < N, and if n > IV,
(S a c \fn\p d t f / P < (fAe \ fn ~ f \ p d f i ) 1^ + (fAe |/|p d u f / P < e/2 + e / 2 = e .
+ [ |/m ~ fn\Pdfl
JAc
< [ 2P(| fm\p + \fnlp) dfi+ f e/n(A) dll
dAmn dA\Amn
<p(f) € Ll(X) and, similarly, the <p(fn) are integrable for all n. Now, since
fn(x),f(x) > rj, |y?(/(x)) - <p(fn(x))\ < c\f(x) - fn(x)| and, consequently,
integrating, fx |<p(f) - <p(fn)\ dp < c fx \f - fn\dp -»> 0 as n ->■ oo.
1 1 4 . Note that s = p/r > 1 and s' = p/(p — r) are conjugate Holder
indices. Now, since f ngn - f g = (fn - f)gn ~ f(g ~ 9n) it follows that
\fn9n-fg\\r
r < c J^\fn - f \ r\gn\r dp + c J \f\r\g - gn\r dp
117. The statement is true for 1 < p < oo but not true for p = 1.
1 1 9 . If p(X) — oo, / is not necessarily in LP{X).
120.W hen p = oo, let A be such that limn fn(x) = f(x) for x € A
and p(Ac) = 0. Now, for all n, let An G M. be such that p(A^) = 0 and
\fn(x)\ < ||/n||oo for x € An, and put B = i 4 n ( f j n An)\ B G M and p(Bc) =
0. Then for x € B, \f(x)\ = limn \fn(x)\ = lim infn |/„(x)| < lim infn ||/n ||oo,
and, consequently, ||/||oo < lim infn ||/n ||oo-
Clearly there may be strict inequality: For p < oo, let fn = n 1/i,x (0)i / n)
and / = 0 a.e., and for p = oo, let fn = X(o,i/n) and / = 0 a.e.
122. Let rik be such that limnkJx fnkdp = lim supn fx fn dp where
the possibility that the limsup is infinite is allowed, and choose a further
subsequence, which we denote again {n ^ }, so that gnk —>• g p,-a.e. and in
Lx{X), and observe that lim infnfe(p„fc - fUk) = limnfe gnk - limsupnfc fUk >
g — limsupn / n. Now, since gnk — fnk > 0 by Fatou’s lemma it follows
that fx lim infnfc(gnk - fnk)dp < lim infnfc fx (gnk - fnk)dp, where by the
previous remark the left-hand side majorizes fx g dp —fx lim supn / „ dp and
by assumption the right-hand side is equal to fx g dp — lim supn fx fndp.
Therefore fx gdp —f x lim supn fn dp < fx g dp —lim supn fx fn dp and the
result follows by canceling the finite quantity fx g dp.
First, suppose that 0 < a < 1. Since Jx f d/j, > 0 there exists A with
p(A) > 0 such that f(x) > 0 for x € A. Then limn n y 5 ((/(x )/n )a) = oo,
x G A, and by Fatou’s lemma limn fA n<p((f/n)a ) dp = oo.
a < oo, to apply the L D C T we estimate rup{{f/n)a) <
Next, if 1 <
c f € Ll{X). W e consider the two cases, namely, f(x) < n and f(x) >
n. In the former case ( f(x)/n)a < f(x)/n, and since tp is nondecreasing
and p(x)/x < M, we have rup((f(x)/n)a) < np{{f(x)/n))(f{x)/f{xj) =
n(p((f(x)/n))/(f(x)/n)f(x) < cf(x). In the latter case, since <p(x) < c
and f(x) > n we have ivp((f(x)/n)a) < c(n/f(x))f(x) < c f(x). So the
assumptions of the L D C T hold and so does the conclusion.
As for functions that satisfy the assumptions, they include arctan(x)
and x / ( l + x). The conclusion also holds for ln (l + x), which satisfies all
the required properties except for boundedness; this fact is only needed for
1 < a < oo. Then by elementary calculus, 1 + ta < (1 + t)a, t > 0, and
(f(x)/n)a) < n\n{(l + f(x)/n)a) = an ln (l + / ( x ) / n ) < a f ( x )
so n ln (l +
whenever / ( x ) < oo, which since / is integrable holds p-a.e. So we can
apply the L D C T with majorant a f to get the limit for a > 1.
1 3 5 . Let c be such that dy = cMn for all M > 0. Then for k suf
ficiently large, 3 /4 < /{M<1/M} Pk(y) dy < / {w < 1/M,% (y)< Mn/4c} <pk(v)dy+
f{<(>k>M*/4c} Vkiy) dy < 1/4 + f {(pk>Mn/4c} <Pk(y)dy. W e then have 1 /2 <
f{vk>Mn/ 4c} Vkiy) dy> and so fRn pp
k(y) dy > J yk>Mn/4cy Pk{y)p~l,Pk(y) dy
> f Wn>M} M y ) dy > M ^ " 1)/(2 (4 c )P -1).
1 3 6 . By Holder’s inequality it suffices to prove that limn ||/n-l/2||2 = 0.
® ^ k odd,
—
xG k even.
342 16. Sequences o f Functions
Now, for integers n > m) each Ik,m is represented as the union of 2n-m
subintervals Ij<n plus a finite number of their endpoints. On the interval
Ik,m the function fn(x) = xn(x) — 1 /2 alternates between —1 /2 and 1 /2 and
has zero integral while fm(x) is constant, specifically, 0 or 1. Hence for n >
m, fo fm(x)fn(x) dx = E fc=i h kiJnfm(x)fn(x) dx = 0. By symmetry the
functions {fk} are orthogonal in L 2([0 ,1 ]). Further, note that Sn(x) —1 /2 =
Then f 0l |5n (x) — 1/2|2 cto = fm(x)fdx =
n " 2 fo1 S , m o i № ) / . ( ■ ) <fa = ™ -2 fo S U tl(x) «fa = n - 2( " / 2 ) 0 as
n —y oo.
140. Let fn(x) = n 2X[o,i/n](z)> n > 1. Then / „ / ( 1 + / „ ) < 1 and
limn( / n/ ( l + fn)) = 0 a.e. in J; hence the conclusion follows by L D C T . The
fn can be easily modified to be continuous on [0,1].
141. (X,p) is a metric space. Let xn — ei + •••-)- en
(a) Clearly
denote the sequence with terms = 1 for k < n and = 0 otherwise; since
p(xn,xm) = 2_1 EfcLn+ i 2_fc —^ 0 as n,m - » oo, {a;n} is Cauchy in (X,p ).
Were {xn} to converge, the limit would be the sequence x with Xk = 1 for
all k, but x X.
Y denote the collection of all sequences; we claim that (Y, p) is
(b) Let
a complete metric space and that X is dense in Y. The density is readily
seen since for y € Y, E fe ln + i 2 ~k\Vk\l{f + N ) < EfcLn+i 2~k = 2 _ n > and>
consequently, y is approximated by the truncates {yn} of y given by = yk
for k < n and y% = 0 otherwise.
A s for completeness, let {x11} be a Cauchy sequence in (Y, p). First, we
claim that {xk} is a Cauchy sequence in R for each k > 1. Indeed, given 0 <
e < 1 , fix k > 1 , let e' be such that 2 ke' < e / 2 , and pick N such that p(xp, xq)
< e' for p, q > N. Then, in particular, 2 ~ fc|xj’ — x | | /(l + \x^ —xq k\) <
p(xp,xq) < e', and so \xp k - xqk\/(l + |x\ - x\\) < 2ke! < e/2 for p,q > N.
Therefore, since e < 1 it follows that \xv k —xk\< e for p,q > N, and {xp k}
is Cauchy in R and, hence, convergent. Let x^3 denote the limit for each k
and x°° = {a:^0}. Finally, given e > 0, pick N so that EfcLw+i 2~k < e /2
and note that
which, since limn — ar^°| = 0 for all k < N, implies that limn p(xn, x°°) =
0. Therefore (Y, p) is a complete space.
(X, ||•||oo) is not complete. For example, consider the sequence xn =
(c)
{xn} is a Cauchy sequence that does not converge
( 1 , 1 / 2 , . . . , 1 /n , 0 , . . . ) ;
in X, and its limit in Y is x°° = ( 1 , 1 / 2 , . . . ) . And, the closure of X in the
topology defined by || • ||oo in Y is cq.
Solutions 343
1 4 4 . Let / „ = 9n +
hn where we set gn - fnX{fn<M}(x) and hn(x) =
fnX{fn>M}(x); it suffices to prove that ¿2ngn(x),J2nhn(x) < oo p-a.e.
First, by the M C T , fx Qn. dp = 5"),» fx Qndp ^ ooy and, con
sequently, the integrand, ^ n gn> is finite p- a.e. Next, let An = {fn > M }
and A = lim supn An\ by Borel-Cantelli p(A) = 0. In other words, p- a.e.
every x G X belongs to finitely many An, and, consequently, hn(x) <
[finite number] M < oo p-a.e.
1 4 8 . Since \JAfndp\ < /x(A )1/ i', ||/n ||r -4 0 as n oo, the conclusion
follows from Problem 147.
So> Sxif - 9 ) ^ dp = 0.
Finally, since L9 (X) functions vanish off a u-finite set, the cr-finiteness
assumption is not really needed.
1 5 2 . For the sake of argument suppose thatA = {|/| > A} has positive
measure. Let g = sgn(f)xA (note that g € L9(X) where 1/p + 1/q = 1),
An = /{|/n|<A} 9 fn dp, and Bn = /{|/n |>A} gfn dp. Note that limsupn \An\<
Ap(A). Now, since weakly convergent sequences are norm bounded,
\\fn\\p < c for all n, and, consequently, by Holder’s inequality \Bn\ <
cp({\fn\ > A })1/ 9 which tends to 0 as n -> 00 . Hence, since fA \f\dp =
limn(A n + Bn), Ap(A) < JA \f\dp < Ap(A), which is not the case. There
fore p{A) = 0 and ll/Hoo < A.
say. By Holder’s inequality J < 2c\\gxx\A\\q < 2ce. A s for I, we use the
finite measure space result.
Note that it may be the case that fn f in ^ ( X ) as the example
fn = n 1/pX(o,i/n), / = 0, in IP(I) shows.
And, when p = 1, the functions fn(x) = nx[o,i/n](®), / = 0, satisfy
n, fn —^ / a.e., but since / [01] fn(x)dx = 1 for all n, { / n}
ll/nlli = 1 for all
does not converge weakly to 0 in Ll(I).
(b) The statement is true.
(c) The statement is not true if the measure is infinite.
156. (a) Recall that by Problem 2.89, M. endowed with the metric
d(A, B) = p(AAB ) is a complete metric space. For £ > 0 and N = 1 , 2 , . . . ,
let Fn = {A e M : |fA(fm-fn) dp\ < £ for all n ,m > N}. Since {fA fn dp,}
is Cauchy for each A € M , it follows that M = \JNFpf. Now, each is
closed and M is complete and so by the Baire category theorem some Fjv0
has a nonempty interior, i.e., there exist A q G Fn0 and r > 0 such that
p (AAA q) < r implies A € F¡q0.
Now let B € M. with p(B) < r ; then B = (Ao U 5 ) \ (Ao \ B) and
p((Ao U B)AAo),p((Ao \ B)AA q) < r. Then for n,m > No we have
\J s (fn ~ fm) dp\ = I//l0ufí(/« —fm) dp —fA0\B(fn ~ ^Tn) ^ 1 —
the same argument to the sets Br\{fn—fm > 0 } and Bn{fn—fm < 0 } yields
J g \ f n — fm\ dp < £ whenever p(B) < r and m,n > No. Now, the family
F = { / i , . . . , fNo} is absolutely uniformly continuous and so there exists 0 <
s < r such that JB \fk\dp < £ whenever 1 < k < No and p(B) < s. Finally,
iip(B) < s and k > N0, JB \fk\dp < fB \fk~ fN0\dp +JB \fN0\dp < 4e + e.
Thus {fn} is uniformly absolutely continuous.
346 16. Sequences o f Functions
Product Measures
Solutions
349
350 17. Product Measures
C= X ( n [ae,be)) e £ ( R m) x £ (R » )
¿=1 ¿=m+l
and, consequently,
A x Rn = (Fa x R n) U (Na x R n)
li ® = [ f X[0,/(*)](») dX(y)dfx(x)
If the statement y < f(x) is replaced by y < f(x), the result still holds
since E = (rp o 0 ) - 1 ([O, oo)) is measurable and A([0, /( x ) ] ) = A([0, /( x ) ) ) .
2 6 . (a) A 0 6 (E) = 2.
(b) JRf d ( X ® 6 )=ir.
28. First, since ( ( X x X) \ A)x = X \ {a ;}, by Tonelli’s theorem fx 0
v ( ( X x X ) \ A ) = Jx v(X \ { x } ) dfx(x) = 0, and so v(X \ { x } ) = 0 ¡x-
a.e. Pick one such x and observe that since v is nontrivial, i^({x}) > 0.
Now, if there exists x\ ^ x such that v(X \ { x i } ) = 0, then v(X \ { x } ) >
i /( { x i } ) > 0, which is not the case. Thus x = a is unique and v = aSa with
a = z^({a}) > 0. Finally, again by Tonelli’s theorem fx 0 ^ ( ( X x X ) \ A ) =
a Jx fx(X \ {y}) d6a(y) = ay,(X \ { a } ) = 0, and as before /X = f35a with
/3 = m(W )-
Solutions 353
(n + 1), x G ( l / ( n + l ) , l / n ] , | /G Q ( 1 [ 0 ,1],
f { x ,y )
0, x = 0 ,o r y £ Q n [0,1].
Finally, the reader should consider why Fubini’s theorem does not apply.
4 3 . The statement is not true. Let
OO
- a ::
Then the linear transformation with matrix M maps [0,1] x [0,1] into the
diamond-shaped region D in (£, rj) space with vertices (0 ,0 ), (1 ,1 ), (1, —1),
and (2 ,0 ), and so JD |/( £ ) - / ( t?)| dX($ ® X(V) = 2 J < 2 c. Thus |/(£) -
/(?;)| 6 L ^ D ) and by Fubini’s theorem there exists £o € ( 1 /2 ,3 /2 ) such
\f(v)
that |/(£0) - f(rj)\ € Q) where A (D io) > 1. Hence, since |/(r?)| <
~ /(Co)| + |/(£o)|, / € Ll{Df:0). And, since /(r?) is periodic of period
1 and X{D^0) > 1 it follows that / € L 1([ 0 ,1]).
= Ü N — C N — d jv ,
say. Since lim^o^v = tt/ 2, and by the L D C T , lim jvc// = lim ^djv = 0, we
get
7T
2
The motivated reader will note that a similar argument gives that
7 9 . Let / € LP(F) and g G Lq(X) with ||5 ||9 < 1. Then |fc(x, 2/)| \f(y)\r
is measurable and if I = (fXxY |k(x, y )| \f(y)\pd¡i(x)<8 >v(y))1/p, by Tonelli’s
theorem
= A2 Í \f(y)\2w(y)~1 w(y)dXn{y).
J Rn
Finally, g = (g + / ) - / is in LP(X).
8 4 . As in Problem 83, fx \f + g\pdg = fRfx \s + g(y)\pdg(y) dgf (s).
Now, for s € 1 , by Jensen’s inequality we have Jx \g(y) + s\pdg{y) >
l /x ( ^ ( y ) + s)dg(y)\p = |fx g(y) dy{y) + a? = |s|p. Hence integrating,
Ir fx I5 + 9 (y)\pdy(y) dfj,f(s) > fR \s\pdyf (s) = fx \f\pdy. The conclusion
follows by combining these estimates.
85.
/ 27r \ n/2
fa * fb ( x ) = fab/(a+b)(x) .
86. (c) The result is not true in general but is true if g(x) —> 0 as
|x| —>•00.
8 8 . (a) Since by Fubini’s theorem fRn( f*g ) d\n = (fRn f d\n)(fRn g d\n)
> 0, / * g > 0 in a set of positive measure. Similarly, if / , g have integrals
of different sign, f * g < 0 in a set of positive measure.
Solutions 361
\f*ipe{x)-rif{x)\< f \ f ( x - y ) ~ f(x)\\ipe(y)\d\n(y)
JRn
<Me~n f \f(x —y) —f(x)\d\n(y)
JB{0,e)
where An (B (0 ,e )) = cnen. Hence
limsup| f*(pe(x) —f(x)\
£—>0
95. For the sake of argument suppose such an / exists. Then by Fu-
bini’s theorem / Rn / * / d\n - (fRn fdXn )2 = fR„ f dXn, and, therefore,
/ RB f d\n = 1. Now, let £ > 0 and g a compactly supported continuously
differentiable function. Then, since
say.
Since / has integral 1, by Problem 94 and Fubini’s theorem limc )0 Ac
= g(z) An-a.e. Moreover, since \g(z —w + £y) — g(z — u>)| < ce\y\ for all
y,z,w e W 1, it readily follows that
\Be\<C Í
JK.n
£~n\f(w/£)\ Í
JKn
\f(y)\£\y\dXn(y)dXn(w) =C£.
f
IQC0 ) 7")! ' JQA
J Q (0 ,r )
f(x - y) d\n(y) < C,
1. Let { ca} a6A be an infinite Hamel basis for X ; then each x G X has a
unique representation as a finite sum x = X^aga ^ a^a - Now, for any collec
tion of positive real numbers { o:a } aga the expression ||x||a = X X gA « a |«a |
is a norm on X and the norms induced by a bounded and an unbounded
{ c*a } are not equivalent. Note that when a\ = 1 for all A, ||eA - e^H = 2 for
A ^ / x and ( X , || • ||) is not separable.
6 . Since max{||x||, ||y||} > (||x|| + ||y||)/2 the second inequality follows
from the first. Now, assume that max{||®||, ||y||} = ||a;|| and set A = ||x||/||y||.
Then
and, consequently,
X y
2 | | * - 2/11 >||*|
\x\\ bn
To see that 1 /2 is the best possible constant suppose that the inequality
holds for a constant M , and for x G X with ||x|| = 1 put y = —x /n , n > 2.
365
366 18. Normed Linear Spaces. Functionals
and so, for all n, 1 + 1 /n > 2M , which implies that 2 M < 1 and M < 1 /2 .
The same example shows that the constant in the second inequality is best
possible.
7. Since the proofs are similar we only consider {wn}. Observe that we
may assume that limn xn = 0. Indeed, if the limit is x, say,
It, N . . .x n(n + 1 ) 1
wn = ^2 ((si - x ) + 2(x 2 - x) H-------- 1- n(xn - x)) H-------- -------^ x >
and so the resulting limit differs from the one obtained for sequences tending
to 0 by x/2. Now, we claim that if xn - » 0, wn —> 0. Given e > 0, let N be
such that ||xn|| < e for n > N. Then for any such n,
K l l < ^2
ft ( M + 2I M + •••+ n \\x n \\)
+ - K ( { n - N) + { n - N
n£ v
+l)-\ -------- 1- n)e
where the second term is less than e /2 and the first goes to zero with n. Thus
limn wn = (limn xn) / 2 . A similar argument gives that limn vn = limn a:n.
2 0 . (a) The statement is false. For instance, in 1 < p < oo, let
Xi = { e i , . . . , e „ , . . . } and X 2 = { - e 2+ 2 _ 1 e i , . . . , - e n + n - 1 e i , . . . } . X i , X 2
are closed since they have no limit points and 0, the only limit point of
X\ + X 2, does not belong to Xi + X 2.
(b) Although as is readily seenX\ + X 2 is a subspace of B, it may happen
that X\ + X 2 is dense but not closed in B. In Co, let X\ = {x G Co : x2n = 0
for all n } and X 2 = {x G co : x2n = x2n-\/n for all n }. W e claim that
X\ + X 2 is dense in, but not equal to, cq. T o see this we first characterize
the sequences in X\ + X 2, namely, x G co is in X\ + X 2 iff nx2n —>• 0. Indeed,
if x G co and nx2n -> 0, let y 1 be given by y\n = 0, y2n_i = x2n-\ - nx2n for
all n, and y 1 the sequence with terms y\n = x2n and y2n-\ = nx2n for all n.
Then y 1 G X\,y 2 G X 2 and x = y 1 + y 2. On the other hand, if x G X\ + X 2,
then x G co and the condition is clearly satisfied. From this it readily follows
that X\ + X 2 is a proper subset of co so it remains to prove that it is dense.
Let x G co and fix e > 0. Then for some N, |a;n| < e for n > N. Defining
the sequence y with terms yn = xn for n < N and yn = 0 for n > N, we
have ¡a: — y||oo < e. From the above it is clear that y G X\ + X 2, and so
X\ + X 2 is dense. Since the sum is still a subspace we have shown that an
infinite-dimensional Banach space may contain a dense subspace that is not
closed. A s we shall see later the kernel of a discontinuous linear functional
on B shares this property.
Solutions 369
t G [0,1]. Thus dist(x, Y) > 1 and there is no y G Y such that \\x — y|| = 1
because if such y existed we would have both y(0) = x (0) + 1 and y(0) =
x(0) — 1. However we can define y(f) as x(t) + 1 for t G [—1,0] and x(t) — 1
for t G (0,1] and then change y(f) in a small neighborhood of 0 to make it
continuous and approximating this way we get that inf2ey ||x — z\\ = 1.
(c) As for uniqueness, suppose ||x — 0(A) || = ||x - 0 (/i) || = rj, say. If
77 = 0, x — 0(A) = x — 0(/Li), and, consequently, 0(A) = 0 (/i), which, by the
linear independence, implies A = p. Otherwise, by the definition of rj, 2 rj =
II* “ 0(A) ||+ 11 *-00011 > ||2 *-[0 (A ) + 0(At)] || = 2 | | » -0 ((A + a* )/2 ) || > 277,
we have equality in the triangle inequality above, and, consequently, by
assumption, x — 0(A) = a [x — <f>(p)\ for some scalar a. If a = 1, A =
p as before. If, on the other hand, a ^ 1, it readily follows that x =
0(A — ap)/{l —a) and r? = 0, which is not the case.
x y
(* + y ) - (
11*11 + \\v\\
from the triangle inequality it readily follows that
= + (IWI + IM)-WI ( + - + ) = 2 ,
which is not the case. Thus x/||x|| = y/||y||, which implies that x = Ay with
A = ||*||/||2/|| > 0.
2 8 . The statement is true.
all ^ 2. But then as we saw above j ) ' _«, 2 ^ 1 /2 for all A^, and,
therefore, the distance cannot be attained for any x € X.
x' = ( 1 , - 1 , - 1 , . . . ) we have ||xo - a/||oo = 1, and the
Note that for
minimum is attained at this sequence x' G c, but ||xo — a;||oo > 1 for all
x€X.
3 1 . It is a matter of rescaling. Note that d(ax, Y ) = |a| d(x, Y ). Hence
36. To verify that X is complete, let Enl krcl l* < oo, or more pre
cisely, E n E < *e A I W I b * < oo. Now, since ||x „| | b q < ||®n|U for all a ,
E n II < oo for each a and since each Ba is complete, E ^ = i ®n con
IIBa
verges to xa, say, in Ba. By the compatibility condition xa = xp for all
a , /0 € A and calling the common value x , E n L i xn ^ x m Ba for all a.
Now, ||®— E n=i^nlls«« = II ^2n=N+ixn\\Ba < En=Ar+i ll^nllBc«) an<i> conse
quently, summing over a and invoking Tonelli’s theorem, ||x— E n = i Xn\\x <
E S U + i llx nl U -»• 0 as N -¥ oo. Thus lim^r E n = i xn = x in X and X is
complete.
(v + 2) - E i »||sc+Bi£ s' -E h L
Bo.+ IBi
71=1 n=l n=l
as N oo.
38. Necessity first. Note that Bo + B\ is complete with both the norm
inherited from 5 and the norm introduced in Problem 37. Let x G Bq+ B\
and x = xo+xi with x q g Bq and x\ G B\. Since Bo and B\ are continuously
embedded in 5 , ||x ||b < ||®o ||b + ||® i ||b < c ( ||x 0 ||b 0 + ||®i ||b i ) and, taking
the inf over all possible decompositions of x in 5 q + B\ it follows that
Solutions 373
||x ||b < c ||x ||b 0+B i - N o w , since Bq + B\ is complete with respect to both
norms by the inverse mapping theorem there exists a constant c such that
IMIbo+B i < c ||x ||b , which is what we wanted to prove.
Conversely, let {xn} be a sequence in B q+ B\ that converges to x G B.
Then {xn} is Cauchy in B, and, consequently, {xn} is Cauchy in Bo + B\,
which by Problem 37 is complete. Let y = limn xn in Bo + B \. Now,
||y - x ||b0+Bi < ||y - *n||B0+Bi + c||xn - x \\b where the first term goes to 0
since ||y—£n||B0+Bi —> 0 and the second term goes to 0 since ||xn — x ||b —t 0;
thus ||y - x ||b0+Bi = 0 an<l x = y G BQ+ B\.
3 9 . The statement is false: In C(I) let Kn = { x £ C{I) : x(0) = 1 ,0 <
x{t) < 1 if t € [0,1/n] and x(t) = 0 if t G [1/n, 1]}.
4 0 . (a) The statement is false. InC(I) let B = {x G C ( [ 0 , 1]) : « (1 ) = 0 }
and K = {x € B : tx(t)dt = 1 }; B is a closed subspace of ( ? ( /) , and so
a Banach space, and K is closed and convex. And, since for all x G K we
have ||x||oo > in fyeK |y||oo, K has no element of least norm.
A be the closed unit ball
(b) The statement is false. In (Kn, II • lloo) let
xn = 1 and |xfe| < 1 for each k,
centered at 2en = ( 0 , . . . , 2). Note that if
then ||x|| = 1 and ||x — 2en || = 1; thus x G A and the distance from a; to 0 is
1. Now, if y € A, then ||y-2e„|| < 1, and so 2 = ||- 2 e n|| = ||y-2en -y|| <
1 + ||y||; that is, ||y|| > 1. Therefore the minimum distance 1 is attained at
each x € R n with xn = 1 and \xk\ < 1 for each 1 < k <n.
x € E(B^oo) iff |xn| = 1 for all n. For the sake of
4 2 . (a) W e claim that
argument suppose that x € E(Bg•») and |x/v| < 1 — e < 1 for some N. Then
x = l ( x + eeN) + \ ( x - e e N)
with
x(t), t £ B, _ J * (0 . 4£ 5 -
y (0 =
x(t) + £, t £ B, 1 x ( f ) — e, t€B,
it readily follows that y, z € B ^ y y x ^ y,z, and x = (y + z)/ 2 , which is
not the case.
Next, let |x(i)| = 1 a.e. and suppose that x = Xy + (1 — A)z for some
y,z in L°°(I) and 0 < A < 1. Note that we may assume that |y(i)| = 1
a.e. Indeed, if this is not the case, |{|y| > 1}| > 0 or |{|y| < 1 } | > 0; in
the former case ||y||oo > 1 and y ^ Bi<x,^ and in the latter ||^||oo > 1 and
z £ Bioo^y, similarly, |z(i)| = 1 a.e. Now let t be such that x(t) = 1. Since
|y(i)|, |z(f)| < 1 and 1 = Ay(t) + (1 — A)z{t) it follows that y(i) = z(t) = 1.
Analogously, if t is such that x(t) = —1, then y(f) = z(t) = —1. Therefore
x = y = z a.e. and x € E{Bi<x^). A similar, yet more involved, proof gives
the conclusion for complex-valued functions.
(b) E(BC{I)) = { —x r ,X /} -
(c) W e claim that E(BLi^ ) = 0. If x = 0 a.e. write x = (y + z ) / 2 with
y(t) = 1, z(t) = —1 a.e. Otherwise, if 0 ^ x € L1 ( / ) , let F(t) = Jq |rc(«) |ds;
F is a continuous function of t with F( 0) = 0 and F(l) = ||x||i, and,
therefore, there exists A € (0 ,1 ) such that F (A ) = ||x||i/2. If ||x||i < 1 let
, (()= 2*(*)• 2 ( i) = °-
' ( 0, A < i < 1, } 2x (f), A < i < 1.
Fix N and let n > m > N. It then readily follows that xn(t) — xm(t) =
(n 1/ 2 - + (*-1/2 - rn^2 )x(i/n,i/m](t), and, consequently,
ll®n - »m||oo,tu = sup tG /1 \xn(t) - xm(t)\ does not exceed
°° OO
< ^2 I M * ) - *n(a) I < |i - s|a P o (* »),
n=N +1 n=N +1
Next, let e > 0. Then there exists N such that ||xn - < e for n > N.
Now, if |t s| < £, since |(x(f) — xn (t)) — (x (s) — xn(s))| < \t-s\apa( x - x n),
it readily follows that pp(x-xn) < £a~Ppa( x - x n) < eQ-^(||xn ||a + ||x||a ) <
2 s a P. And, when |i — s| > e ,
|(x(t) - xn(t)) - (x(s) - x n(s))|
< 2 e~P\\x - Xn < 2 el~P .
|t - 8\0
Thus combining these estimates, p^x - xn) < 2ea~P + 2e1“ ^, and, conse
quently, ||x - xny = |x(0) - x n(0)| + pp(x - x „) < e + 2 ea~P + 2 el~P.
(c) Let { x n} be a sequence in S with ||xn ||^ < 1, Given £ > 0, let
S = el/a and note that since by the definition of S, ||x„||a < 1 for all n,
|xn(t) — x n(s)| < ||^n||a|i — s la ^ £ for |i — s| < 5. Thus { x n} is uniformly
376 18. Normed Linear Spaces. Functionals
55. Only if <f>is linear. By Problem 21 there exists {xn} C B e (/) such
that \\xn — ajfnlloo > 1/2 for n ^ m. Fix a continuous function / on R +
such that / ( 0 ) = 1 and f(t ) = 0 for t > 1/ 6. Now, for any x G
consider the functional (f)x on £c(J) given by 4>x(y) = /(||y — £||oo); note
that since ||y — x||oo is continuous in y and the composition of continuous
functions is continuous, <f>x is a continuous function on Let <p be the
functional on Bc{1) given by <p = Ylnn4>xn■ This series converges and its
sum is continuous because by construction for any x G -Bc(/) there is an
open neighborhood Ux of x such that all except for finitely many terms in
the series vanish on Ux. On the other hand, <p(xn) = n, and <j>is unbounded.
Xp
Xx + (x + y ) e K ,
A+ p X+ p
which implies that Xp/(X + p) < M{x + y), and, consequently, p(x + y) <
1/A + l/p, and since 1 /A and 1/p can be picked arbitrarily close to p(x) and
p (y ), respectively, the triangle inequality holds.
Now, since x0 <£ K i t readily follows that M(x o) < 1, and so p(®o) > 1.
Thus by Hahn-Banach there exists a linear functional L on X with ||L|| = 1
such that L( xq) =p(x o) > 1. In particular, since M(x) > 1, and so p(a;) < 1,
it readily follows that \L(x)\ < ||L|| p(x) < 1 for x € K.
6 7 . L et L(x) = ||x||£(x/||x||).
68 . (b ) L et L i , L 2 G X* with norm 1 be such that (L\ + L2 )/ 2 G S,
the unit sphere of X*. Put Y = K(L,2 — L\) and let £ = L\\y denote the
restriction of L i to Y ; we claim that £ is a continuous linear functional on Y
of norm 1 that admits two distinct extensions to X of norm 1. Let x G Y.
Then L 2( x ) = L 2(x ) — L\(x) + L\(x) = L\(x) and clearly L i and L 2 extend
£ to X; it only remains to prove that ||£|| = 1. To see this we first construct a
sequence {xn} c Y such that ||xn || -»• 1 and £{xn) ->• 1. Since (L\ + L 2) / 2 G
5 there exists {yn} C X of norm 1 such that (L\{yn) + L 2(yn))/2 —> 1, in
other words, L\(yn) + L 2(yn) —> 2; since L\ and L 2 have norm 1 each of
the terms converges to 1. Now, since L\ ^ L 2 there exists u e l such that
L\{u) —L 2(u ) = 1. Let xn = yn + (L 2(yn) — L i(y n))u. It then readily follows
that L i(x n) = L 2(xn), i.e., x n G Y. Also, since |L2(?/n) - Li(yn)\ -¥ 0,
limn Iknll = limn ||yn || = 1, and since £(xn) = (L 2(yn) - L i ( y n))£(u) +£(yn),
limn ^(xn) = limn £(yn) = limn Lx(yn) = 1.
6 9 . Let X = {x G i 1 : x 2n = 0, n = 1 , 2 , . . . } .
7 0 . No matter what £P norm is considered in R 2, ||^|| = 1. Now, for
p > 1, with q the conjugate to p, an extension L of £ of norm 1 is given
by L ( x i , x 2) = oxi + 6x 2, where |a|9 + |6|9 = 1. Moreover, since L\y = £,
L ( x i , 0) = axi = x i, and a = 1, which together with |a|9 + |6|9 = 1 implies
6 = 0, and the extension is unique.
On the other hand, when p = 1 an extension L of £ is given by L ( x i , x 2) =
axi + 6x 2 with max(|a|, |6|) = 1, which together with a = 1 gives any 6 with
|6| < 1, and so there are infinitely many extensions to (R2, || • ||i).
L (m + n) = £m (m) + £n {ia)
= 1 + (m - mi)) + £n { u \ + (n —ni))
= £m {™1) + ^/v(m),
since £m (jb, — m i) +
£n {™— n i) £m {wi —m1) + £n ( ~ ( m — m i ) ) = 0. L is
linear, L|Af(m) = £m (^), and L|iv(n) = £n (p ).
Now, in the normed case, if £m ,£n are continuous, it follows that
|L(m + n)| < \\£M\\||ni|| +\\tN\\||n|| < c(||m|| + ||n||) and since M + N
is closed, by Problem 38, |L(m -I- n)| < c||m + n||.
And, if p > 0,
q(px) = inf{p(px + Az) — Ap(z) : A > 0 }
= inf { m(p (x + (X/fi)z) - (A/p)p(z)) : A > 0 } = pq(x).
84. For the sake of argument suppose that every continuous linear
functional on (X, || • ||x) can be extended to a bounded linear functional
on ( B , || • ||#). Let
R : B* X* denote the restriction mapping given by
R(L) = L\x, L € B*; by assumption R is onto. Furthermore, if L e B* and
R{L) = L\x = 0, since X is dense in B, L = 0 and R is injective. Finally, if
x € X and L € B*, then \L\x (x)\ = \L(x)\ < ||L||b *||*IIb < C\\L\\B*\\x\\x,
and so \\R\\ < C. Thus R is a bounded bijection and by the inverse mapping
theorem R ^ 1 : X* —> B* is bounded, and, consequently, there exist c, C such
that c||L||B* < II^UHx* < C\\L\\B* for all L € B*.
Now, let x € X. By Problem 83(a) there is L € X* with ||L||x* = 1 such
that \L{x)\ = Usd*, and, by assumption, L can be extended to a continuous
linear functional £, say, on (B , || • ||#). Then ||x||* = |L(x)| = \£(x)\ <
||^||b *||®||b and since ||r||# < C'||r||x it follows that || • ||# ~ || • ||* on X.
Moreover, since (X, || • ||x) is complete, so is (X, || • ||#). Thus X is closed
in B , and being dense, X = B, which is not the case.
8 5 . (a) It is readily seen that ||L|| = 1/2 and that if x = x / , L(x) = 1/2.
86 . (a) Given a € / , let $ : Vn —> Mn+1 be the mapping given by $ (p ) =
(*o, •••, xn) where Xk = f/P(t) (t — a)kdt, k = 0 , 1 , . . . , n. W e claim that
iiT($) = { 0 } , the zero polynomial. Indeed, let p(t) = X)fc=i cfe (i — a)k € Vn,
and note that if $ (p ) = ( 0, . . . , 0), then $ (p ) = ff p(t) (t —a)kdt = 0 for all
k, 0 < k < n, and, consequently, Jjp(t)2dt — 0, which implies that p = 0.
Therefore by dimensional considerations $ maps Tn onto R n+1 and there
exists Pn,a e Vn such that JjP^ai^dt = 1, ff (t - a)kPnia(t)dt = 0, 0 <
k < n. Now, if p is a polynomial of degree < n, write p(t) = dk{t —o)k
and note that ff p(t) Pn,a(i) dt = p(a).
Solutions 383
(b) It suffices to prove the result for k = 0, deduce from this the result for
k — 1 , and then iterate. Let Pn>a <£ Vn be the polynomial in (a) and cn)o,a =
sup ie7 |P„,a(f)|; by the representation formula |p(a)| — On,o,a J/ 1 pif) I dt.
Since for p € Vn also p' € Vn, by (a), p'(a) = ¡¡p'{t) Pn,a(t) dt, and so
integrating by parts, p'(a) = Pn,a( l ) p ( l ) - P „lO(0 )p (0 ) - ¡¡p(t) P^>a(f)<ft
and the conclusion holds with cnXa = (c„,o,o + cn,o,i)cn,o,a + sup 7 |P^a(f)|.
Finally, for no universal constant c0 the inequality holds for all polyno
mials. Indeed, let a = 1 and Pk{t) = tk. Then ||pfe||i = 1/(A + 1) and the
inequality 1 = |p/;(l)| < M/(k + 1) cannot hold for all k for a fixed finite
constant M .
observe that
z -L Y iff there exists 0 ^ L G X* such that Y C K(L) and \L(z)\ = ||L|| ||z||,
and that d(xo, Y) = ||2o — yo|| iff *o — yo -L Y.
9 5 . A particular case of interest isY = { x n} , a sequence in X. Then
x 6 X is the limit of finite linear combinations of the xn iff L(x) = 0 for all
bounded linear functionals L on X such that L(xn) = 0 for all n.
96. (a) For the sake of the argument suppose that Lk(x) = 0 for
k = 1, . . . , n implies x = 0. Assuming as we may that the Lk are lin
early independent, we claim that d i m ( X ) < n. If d im (X ) = m > n, let
x i , . . . , x m be linearly independent elements of X and consider the system
of linear equations Y^k=\ akLi(xk) = 0, i = 1, . . . , n, with unknown scalars
a i , . . . , am. Since n < m the system has a nontrivial solution A i , . . . , Am, say,
and if 2 = Y^k=\ ^kxki x i 1 0, by construction Lk(x) = 0 for A: = 1 , . . . ,n ,
which by assumption implies that 2 = 0, which is not the case.
(b) Let F denote the scalar field. Assume that the Lk are linearly inde
pendent and let T : X —> F n + 1 be given by T(x) = (L ( x), £ 1(2 ) , . . . , Ln(x));
T is a bounded linear mapping and since ( 1 , 0 , . . . , 0) ^ R{T), R(T) is a
proper subspace of Fn+1. Therefore there exists a nonzero linear func
tional on F n + 1 that vanishes on R(T). In other words, there exist scalars
A, A i , . . . , An, not all 0, such that XL(x) + J2k= l AkLk(x) = 0 for all x € X.
If A = 0, this gives a nontrivial relation in the L/., contrary to their linear
independence. Thus A ^ 0 and L(x) = —A-1 Ylk=i AfcLfc(2 ).
For the opposite inequality recall that for 1 < p < oo, if sk, tk are
positive and sk = tlj/p, 1 < k < N, there is equality in Holder’s inequality.
Let e > 0. Then there are xk € Bk such that ||iCfe||sfc = and
L(xk) > \\Lk\\B* INII b * - e , 1 < k < n , and, consequently,
N N
k=1 k= 1
which since e is arbitrary gives ||L|| > (J2k=i II^II b *)1^9- If V = 1 clearly
Ill'll > m axi<fe<n \\Lk\\B*.
Given a continuous linear functional L on Bk equipped with ||•||p
for a fixed 1 < p < oo, let Lk be the linear functional on Bk given by
Lk{xk) = L ( ( 0 , . . . , 0, xk, 0 , . . . , 0 )), k = 1, . . . , N. Note that Lk e B% and
\\L k\\B* < ||L||, 1 < k < n. Then L(x) = J 2 k = i Lk{xk) and by the above ar
gument ||L|| = (SfcLi ||£fc| i y 1/9, which gives the desired characterization.
1 0 7 . No.
1 0 8 . W e invoke the fact that a subset A of a metric space is nowhere
dense if Ac is open and dense. So, let c = A; Ac is open. Indeed, given
388 18. Normed Linear Spaces. Functionals
x € Ac, there exist a subsequence {xn/1} of {xn} and 77 > 0 such that
|x„fc - xUm| > 77 for all k,m. We claim that if ||x - y||oo < f?/3, y E Ac.
For the sake of argument suppose that one such y E A and pick M large
enough so that \ynk — ynmI < ?7/3 for all fc,7n > M . Then \xnic — x „ m| <
\xnk ~ y nk\ + |Vnk - Vnm \ + \Vnm - x nJ < 77, which is not the case. Also,
Ac is dense in £°°; let x E £°° and e > 0 be given. If x E Ac, put y = x.
Otherwise, define y with terms yn = xn, n odd, and yn = xn + (e/2 ) , n even.
Then ||ar - y||oo < e / 2, and, clearly, y E Ac.
109. First, £l C Cq. Indeed, since J2nxnVn converges for x E c0 and
y € i 1, Ly(x) = J2nXnVn defines a linear functional on Co, which, since
\Ly(x)| < ||»||i||*||oo, is bounded with ||2^|| < ||y||i. Actually ||i^|| = ||y||i;
let x € co be given by xn = yn/\Vn\ if n < N and yn 7^ 0, and xn =
0 otherwise. Then \Lv{x)\ = Yln=i \yn\, and since ||x||oo = 1 and N is
arbitrary, ||X^|| > ||y||i-
Conversely, given L € Cq, let yn = L(en), n = 1 , 2 , . . . ; we claim that
y € £x and L{x) = Ly{x) for all x € Co- The latter assertion is obvious.
As for the former, fix N and as before define x € cq with ||x||oo = 1 and
L(x) = En=i \Vn\- Since L is bounded, J2n=i \Vn\ = \L(X)\ < ll^llcg for all
N, y e i1, and, since L = Ly, as before ||L|| = ||y||i.
110 . Let p be the functional on £°° given by p(x) = limsupn x ra; p is
clearly sublinear. Let£ be the linear functional on { 0 } given by the zero func
tional; then £(0) = 0 = lim supn 0n and by Hahn-Banach £ can be extended
to a linear functional L on £°° such that L (x ) < p(x) — lim supn xn for all
x € £°°. Applying this to —x we get —L(x) = L(—x) < limsupn(—xn) =
— lim infn x n, and, therefore, lim infn xn < L (x ) < limsupn xn. Finally,
since limsupn xn < supn xn < supn |xn| and also lim infn xra > infn x n >
— supn |xn|, we have |L(x)| < ||x||oo and L is bounded with norm < 1.
111. (a) Clearly L0Q is a bounded linear functional with norm < 1.
Moreover, since the sequence in c with xn = 1 for all n satisfies ||x|| = 1 and
Lqo(x ) = 1, 11Loo11 = 1. Note that vanishes in c q .
(b) The statement is false.
(c) W e first define a positively homogenous, subadditive functional p :
£°° —>• M such that Loo(x) < p(x) for x G c. O f course p(x) = ||a;||oo or
p(x) = limsupn x n will do but, since an attractive feature of p(x) is being
as small as possible, let
limsupn xn. This implies in particular that L00(x) = p(x) for x G c and
by Hahn-Banach L00 has an extension L to £°° such that L\c = Loo and
L(x) < p(x) for x G £°°. Moreover, applying this observation to —x, since
—L(x) = L ( —x) < p(—x) = —lim infn n -1 Y^k=1xki it readily follows that
being obvious. As for the other inequality, let xN be the sequence in c given
by
xN = { sgn(yfc) ’ 1 - k - N^
k ^sgn(A), k > N.
Then Har^Hoo = x^o = sgn(A), and, consequently, L\.y(xN) = |A| +
1>
E fc U \Vk\ +Y,b=N+iaksgn(A). Therefore, since y € t1, lim N L^y(xN) =
W + llyili-
Furthermore, we claim that a bounded linear functional L on c is of
the form L\iV for some scalar A and y 6 t1. To prove this we verify that
the sequence y with terms yn = L (en) for all n is in t 1 and ||y||i <
If xN is the sequence in c with terms x% = sgn(L(en)) for n < N and
x% = 0 otherwise, then Ha^Hoo = 1 and \L{xN)\ = \L(%2 n=i x ne n)\ =
E n = l \L(en)\ < Ill'll- Since this is true for all N, ]T n |L(en)| < ||L||. Also,
i f e = ( 1 , 1 , . . . ) , \L(e)\<\\L\\.
Finally, for x G c write x = «oo e + (xn —Xoo) en where the series
converges in £°° and, hence, in c, and so L(x) = (L(e) — J2n L (en)) Xoo
+ E n L(en) %n- Thus with A = L(e) —]T)n L(en) and y e t 1 with yn = L(en)
for all n, L = L\tVand ||L|| = |A| + ||y||^i. Thus the norm in c* is an t 1 norm
and c* is isometrically isomorphic to t1, which is the dual of cq.
1 1 9 . (a) Since for any L6 A and y E Y, |L(a;)| = |L(x — y)| < ll* -y | | .
taking the sup over L G A and then the inf over y e Y gives supieA \L(x)\ <
d(x, Y). As for the opposite inequality, if d(x, Y) > 0, by Hahn-Banach there
is a bounded linear functional L on X with norm ||L|| = 1/ d(x, Y) so that
L(x) = 1 and L vanishes on Y. Therefore d{x,Y) — |L(a;)|/||Z/|| and since
L/\\L\\ € A, d(x, Y) < supK€A \L( x )\. _ ______
(b) If Y = X there is nothing to prove. Otherwise, if L G A, Y C K(L) =
K(L), and so Y C f]LeAK(L). Conversely, suppose that x <£Y. Then by
Problem 80 there exists L € X* such that ||L|| < 1, L(x) = d(x,Y) > 0,
and L(y) = 0 for y G Y. In particular, x ^ K(L) and so x ^ f]LeAK(L).
Hence r W * W c F .
122. X* = {y : \yn\< c2n for some constant c for all n } with ||y||A * =
supn 2- n|yre|.
the constant is 0, y = 0 a.e., and L vanishes for all x € Z7(R n). Hence by
Problem 95(b), D is dense in Lp(R n).
129. (a) Let Q c K n denote the cube centered at the origin of side-
length 1 and q the conjugate exponent to p. By Problem 5.11 the function
y(t) = 11 1~n/ q(ln( 1/ 1i|) ) - 2/ ?x <2(t) e Lq(Rn) \ U q<$Ls(Rn). Let A = {x on
Rn : x is measurable, bounded, and fRn y(t)x(t) dt = 0 }. Now, for 1 < r < p,
let L be a bounded linear functional on Lr(Rn) that vanishes on A and
2 € L s(Rn), where s is the conjugate to r, such that L{x) — fRn z(t)x(t) dt
for all x € 17 (Rn). Since XJ £ A f ° r all cubes J C Qc, fjz(t)dt = 0
for such cubes and by the Lebesgue differentiation theorem z = 0 a.e.
in Qc. Next, x(t) = (fJiy(u)du)- 1 xj1(t) ~ (fj 2 y(u) du)~1 XJ2 (t) € A for
all cubes J\, J2 C Q, and, therefore, L(x) = (JJi y(u) du)~l z(t) dt —
( fj 2 y(u) du)~l fj 2 z(t) dt = 0 for those cubes. Consequently, the expression
(Jj y(u) du)~xfj z(t) dt is independent of the cubes J C Q and Jj z(t) dt =
c Jj y(u) du for all those cubes J and some constant c. Hence by the Lebesgue
differentiation theorem z(t) = cy(t) a.e. in Q and since y £ LS(Q), c = 0,
and then z(t) = 0 in Q. Thus z = 0 a.e. and L is the zero functional.
Consequently, by Problem 95(b), A is dense in 17 (Rn).
is not possible. Thus limn Loo(vn) ^ Loo(v) and {vn} does not converge
weakly to v in £°°.
p < oo. The statement is not true
1 3 5 . The statement is true for 1 <
for p = oo. Let xn — e\ — en and x = e\. Then ||xn ||0O = ||x||oo = 1 and
by Problem 133, xn —k x but \\xn — x||oo = ||en ||oo = 1 for all n . And since
Cq = i 1, it is not true for cq either.
141. (a) The statement is true. First, necessity. For the sake of ar
gument suppose that { x n} C Y is such that xn —^ x but x </ Y . Since
Y is closed, by Hahn-Banach there is a bounded linear functional L on X
with L(x) = 1 that vanishes on Y. Therefore, since L(xn) = 0 for all n,
L(x) 7^ limn L (x n), which is not possible since xn —v x. Conversely, let
{ x n} C Y and limn xn = x E X. Then for every bounded linear functional
L, |L(xn) —L(x)| = |L(xn — x)| < ||L|| ||x — x n || ->■ 0. Hence xn x, which
since Y is weakly closed gives that x E Y.
(b) The statement is true. W e prove that B( 0, l ) c is weakly open. To
see this let x E B (0 , l ) c and set e = ||x|| — 1 > 0. By Problem 80 there
L(x) = ||x|| = 1 + e. Then O = {y E
exists L E X * such that ||L|| = 1 and
X : |L(y — x)| < e } is an open neighborhood of x in the weak topology,
and we claim that O C Bc(0, 1). Indeed, for any y E 5 ( 0 , 1 ) , we have
394 18. Normed Linear Spaces. Functionals
\L(y)\ < ||L|| ||y|| < 1, and hence \L(y - x)| > L{x) - \L(y)\ > e, so y £ O.
Thus B( 0, 1) is weakly closed.
(c) The statement is false.
143. (a) ThatX is closed in C(I) follows readily from the fact that
convergence in C(I) is uniform convergence. Suppose that x G C(I ) vanishes
at 0 and ||x||oo < 1; by continuity there exists 77 G (0,1] such that |a:(i) | < 1 /2
on [0, 77]. Therefore / q1 |x(i)| dt = \x(t)\dt + |x(t)| dt < 77/2 + (1 — rj) =
1 — 77/2 < 1, and, consequently, x £ X.
(c) Let xn(t) = nt,n > 2; then xn € X and ||xn ||oo = n. Hence X is not
bounded and, therefore, not compact.
lim
N
w- Ew
n=l
X /Y
= 0.
M M
Since E n ll*n||x < oo the expression in the right-hand side above goes to 0
as N, M —> oo and { j/ tv} C Y is Cauchy and, hence, convergent to y € Y,
say. It is now clear that limjv ||(x—y) —E ^ = i x n ||x = 0 and we have finished.
162. (a) B /M = C.
164. Let { x n} C Y X; since a subsequence { x nfc}
converge to x €
of { x n} converges to x a.e., x(t) = 0 a.e. in [0, 1/ 2] and x € Y, which is
therefore closed. Now, x = xx[o,i / 2] + x X[i/ 2,i] and since x x p / 2,1] £ F ,
infyey II* + y\\x = ll*X[o,i/ 2]l|x, and || [x]\\X/y = / 01/2 |x(i)| dt.
398 18. Normed Linear Spaces. Functionals
where the second inequality follows on the one hand from the fact that
||7r(x)|| < ||:r|| and on the other hand from the fact that for any [x\ G
Bb / x {0) 1) there is a sequence {yn} c X such that limn ||x + yn || < 1. Thus
<fi is an isometric embedding.
If T G X L C B* we define A G (B/X)* by A([®]) = L(x). First note
that, since L(x + y\) = L(x + y2) for all 2/1, 2/2 € X, A is well-defined.
Moreover, since T is linear, A is linear and |A([x])| = |T(x)| for all x G B,
and, therefore, ||A|| = ||T||. Finally, since ( 7r(A),x) = (A, 7r(x)) = L(x) for
all x G B, it follows that <j>(A) = T and <f>is surjective.
173. Y** can be identified with the subspace Y ’J" L of X**. More pre
cisely, with Jy denoting the restriction of Jx to Y, there is an isometric iso
morphism U : Y** —>• Y 1-1- with the property that Uo Jy = Jx \y - Indeed, let
S : Y - » X be the natural embedding; then S** : Y** - * Y 1 1 c X**. More
over S** o JY = Jx o S = Jx \y , as is shown by the following ( “algebraic” )
argument: for z G Y and L G X*, (S** o Jy(z))(L) = (J y (z ))(S * (L )) =
(S*(L))(z) = L(S(z)) = (Jx o S(z))(L). Moreover, by standard arguments,
115**11 = ||5|| = 1. It remains to show that S** is an isometry onto Y’J“ L, i.e.
that 115**011 > ||0|| for all 9 G Y**.
If 9 G Y** and ||0|| = 1, then, for all r < 1, there exists h G Y* with
\\h\\ — 1 and 9(h) > r. By Hahn-Banach we can extend h to / G X* satisfy
ing ||/|| = \\h\\. Expressing the notion of “extension” in other language, we
have / o 5 = h, or 5 * / = h. W e thus have ||5**0|| > ( S**9)(f) = 0 ( 5 * / ) =
9(h) > r. Thus ||5**0|| = 1 and 5** is isometric.
Now suppose that £ G Y-11- c X**. W e want to find 9 G Y** with
S**(9) = £. W e notice that if G X* are such that /i| y = / 2|y, then
/ 1 - / 2 € Y 1 and so £ ( / 1) = £ ( / 2) because £ G T-*“ 1. For h G Y* we can
unambiguously define 9(h) = £ ( / ) , where / is any element of X* extending
h. It follows from this definition that 9(f\z) = £ ( / ) , i.e., S**(9) = £.
1 7 4 . The duals of C(I) and of C(I) ® co are isometrically isomorphic.
1 7 6 . Fix a countable dense subset {xn} of the closed unit ball of B and
let T : i l —»• B be the linear mapping given by T( A) = Yin ^n%n, A G since
T(en) = xn and ||T(A)|| < |An |||xn || < ||A||^i, T is bounded with norm
1. W e claim that T is onto. First observe that, given x G B with ||x|| < 1,
there is a subsequence {xUk} of {xn} such that ||a; — 2 ~^xnj || < 2 ~(~
k+1^
for all k > 0. Indeed, when A; = 0, by the density assumption there is xno
such that ||m— xno || < 2_ 1 . Next, having chosen xnQt.. ., xUk_ 1 such that
II* - E j = o 2 ~jxnj || < 2~k, let y = x - Y j = o 2~jxnr Then ||2fcy|| < 1
and again by density there exists xnk ^ xnj for 0 < j < k — 1, such that
l|2fey — *„*11 < 2_1 or, equivalently, ||x - Y j= o 2 ~jxnj\\ < 2_ (fc+1). Now,
x = Y'jLo 2.~^xn j, and, therefore, if A is the sequence defined by An = 2-J
if n = rij and Ara = 0 otherwise, then A G t 1 and T(A ) = YJLo 2r^xnj = x.
Next, if x ^ 0 and ||a:|| ^ 1 , let x! = x/||x||, ||a/|| = 1, and let A' G l x
be such that T (A ') = x'. Then by the linearity of T , if A = ||ic||A' G i 1,
T(A) = ^ ^ ( A ' ) = ||x||a:' = x. Finally, if x = 0, then T (0 ) = 0. Hence, T is
surjective.
Solutions
403
404 19. Normed Linear Spaces. Linear Operators
1/2 0 0
1/ 22 1/ 22 0
l / 2n ................ l / 2n 0
/ (1 /(1 + A i))y i, n = l,
Xn = \
[ ( —An/(1 + A i))j/i + yn, n > 2,
12. (a) Since T is defined on £%, it is densely defined if p < oo. Note then
that D(T) = £P iff A € £°°. Sufficiency first. If A € £°°, then E n |An xn\r <
H-MloolMlp < °°> and D(T) = HP. On the other hand, if A ^ £°°, let {A nfc}
be a subsequence of A such that |AnJ > 3k for all k and observe that for
x = E fc 2_fcenfc, IM|p = E fc 2_fcp < oo. yet l|T(*)||? > E f c ( 3 /2)fer = oo if
r < oo, and ||T(a;)||00 > sup/i.( 3 /2 ) fc = oo if r = oo. Hence x £ D(T) and so
D(T) ^ £P.
Lastly, if p = r = oo, D(T) is dense in £p iff D(T) = £P, which happens
iff A € £°° (done in (b)) below.
(b) If An = 0 for some n, ||en — y\\r > 1 for all y € R(T) and R(T) is
not dense in £r. On the other hand, if An ^ 0 for all n, R(T) contains the
subspace of all finitely nonzero sequences, which is dense in fP if r < oo.
Hence i f l < p < r < o o and An ^ 0 for all n, R(T) is dense in £r.
Now, ifp < r = oo and y = T(x), then ||a;||£ = E ^ L i |Anr% n|p <
l|y||~E~=i|An|-p. Hence, if E n |An|"p < oo, then R(T) = £°°. On the
other hand, if E n l^nl_p = 00 and E n \^n\~p\yn\P < oo, then lim infn \yn\=
0, which implies that if e = ( 1 , 1 , . . . ) , ||e — y||oo > 1, and so R(T) is not
dense in £°°.
Finally, if p = r = oo, as above it follows that R(T) is dense in £°° iff
infn |An|> 0, in which caseR(T) - £°°.
Now, if T is onto we must have An ^ 0 for all n. If r
< oo, let t = r/p and
s = rj(v —p) be conjugate exponents. Given y € £r, let x be given by xn =
A~lyn for all n. Then by Holder’s inequality E n lxn|p = E n l 'M - p |s/n|p <
( E n \K\~n1/s(En \yn\r)p/r, and, therefore, a sufficient condition for T to
be onto is that E n l^n|-ps < oo. This condition is also necessary. For the
sake of argument suppose that E n l-M _ps = oo and let ng —> oo be chosen
so that ni = 1 and wg = ( E n*<fc<nm |Afc|- p s ) 1/r > 2 ps^ r for all £ > 1.
Clearly, if ye is given by
\\y% = 1 for all £. Put y = 2~eye and note that yk = 2~eye k for
ng < k < ng+ 1 for all £, and ||y||r < E * 2 _ ^ = 1- Observe that if x has
terms xn = X~lyn for all n > 1, then T(x) = y. Moreover, since
1 9 . (b) Since all norms on X are equivalent, ||«||x ~ ||®||i = X3fc=i l^fel
where x = X )fe = i xn}. Then
€ s p { x i ,. . . ,
20 . Note that the closed graph theorem does not apply since the spaces
involved are not necessarily complete.
T(x)n —xn > 0, which is not the case. Thus T{x) > x. Suppose now that
for some x G i 00 with 0 < xn < 1 we have T(x)k > Xk for some k, and
let y = (1 — x i, . . . , 1 — xn, ...). Then yn > 0 for all n, and, consequently,
T{y)n > yn for all n. However, since T{y)k = 1 — T(x)k < 1 —Xk = yk, this
doesn’t hold for the index k. Therefore T(x) = x. Finally, for an arbitrary
sequence x G £°°, let x = x\ — #2 where all the terms of x\ and X2 are > 0.
Then H^illoo, ||cc2||oo < IMloo, and
and so
l l ^ c l l x + ||&ec||x
xce?c Ik c lk c p
410 19. Normed Linear Spaces. Linear Operators
1 0 0 0 0 O'
S= T= ST =
0 0 0 1 0 0 '
41. Fix a positive integer m and for n € N, write n = mqn+ rn with 0 <
rn < m. Then ||Tn || < ||Tm||9n||T||rn, and since qn/n - » 1 /m and rn/n 0
as n —>■ oo, it follows that limsupn ||Tn ||1//n < ||jim||1/ r« < ||71|| < oo. This
readily gives limsupn ||Tn ||1/ n < infm ||Tm]|1/ m < lim infn ||Tn ||1/ n.
45. The statement is false. Let T : C l{I) —> C(I) be given by T(x) =
x + x then T is linear and closed but not bounded, and, therefore, by the
closed graph theorem, (C'1( I), || • ||) is not a Banach space.
46. (a) As proved in Problem 45, the differential operator T : Cl {I) —>
C(I) is closed but not bounded; in this case the domain X = Cl(I) is not
complete. A n example along similar lines has been discussed in Problem 9,
with X = {a: G i 1 : ^ n «|a;n| < oo} and T : X —» l 1 given by T(x) = y,
where yn = nxn, x € X.
(b) Let B be an infinite-dimensional Banach space, H a (necessarily
infinite) Hamel basis for B such that \\h\\ = 1 for all h 6 H, and || • ||i the
norm on B given by ||a;||i = |a„| where x = anhn, hn € H, 1 < n <
N. Let X denote the linear space B endowed with the metric || • ||i, and
T :B X the identity map; T is 1-1, onto, and as is readily verified, closed.
However T is not bounded, for otherwise since B is complete it would follow
that X is complete, which is not the case.
Solutions 411
4 7 . (a) implies (b) This is clear since ( 0, y) £ G(T) = G(T) for all y ^ 0.
(b) implies (c) Since (xn,T ( x n)) 6 G{T) for all n, (0,y ) G G (T ), and,
therefore, by assumption y = 0.
(c) implies (a) Let D = {x € X : there exists y € Y such that
(x ,y ) G G (T )} and define T : D —> Y by T (x ) = y. Now, if yi g Y is
such that (x ,y i) G G (T ), since G(T) is a linear subspace, (x,y) — (x, y\) =
(0 ,y — y\) G G (T ), and so there exist (x n,T ( x n)) G G (T ) such that
(xn,T ( x n)) ->• (0 ,y — y i), and, consequently, by assumption, xn -»• 0 and
T(xn) y —y\. Therefore y — yi = 0, and T is well-defined. Next, T is
linear and closed by definition. To see that T extends T we must verify
that D(T) C D and T (x ) = T(x) if x G D(T). Now, x G D(T) implies
(x ,T ( x )) G G(T) c G (T ), and so x G D. Then by the definition of D and
T it follows that T(x) = T(x) for x G D(T).
Note that T is the minimal extension of T, i.e., if T\ is a closed extension
of T , then (i) D(T ) c D (T i), and (ii) T\{x) = T{x) for all x G D{T).
To see this observe that since T\ is closed, G(T) C G(Ti) = G (T i), and,
consequently, G(T) = G(T) c G (T j), which gives (i). And, for all x G D(T ),
(x ,y ) G G (T ) implies (x ,y ) G G (7 i). Thus y = T (x ) implies y = T i(x ),
which gives (ii).
59. By Problem 94(a), ||Tn || < c for all n and some constant c > 0.
For the sake of argument suppose that there exist rj > 0 and a subsequence
{TnkK } of {TnK } such that \\TnkK-TK\\ > rj. Let {xnk} C B with ||xnfc|| =
1 such that ||TnkK(xnk) - TK(xnk)\\B > V- Since K is compact, passing
to a subsequence if necessary we may assume that {K(xUk)} converges to
V € B, say. Then TnkK(xnk) - TK(xnic) = TnkK(xnk) - Tnk(y) + Tnk(y) -
T(y) + T(y) - TK(xnk), where \\TnkK{xnk) - Tnk(y)\\B < c \\K(xnk) - y\\B
is arbitrarily small for large, and the same is true for \\T(y)—TK(xnk)\\B
since T is bounded. Also, for sufficiently large, ||Tnfc(y ) — T(y)\\B is ar
bitrarily small. Thus combining these estimates, \\TnkK(xnk) —TK(xnk)\\B
is arbitrarily small, which is not the case since it exceeds 77 > 0.
observe that since ||T(a:nfc) - T(xne)\\x > c\\xnk - xne\\b , {xnk} is a Cauchy
subsequence of {xn}, and, hence, convergent in B, which is not the case.
65. For the sake of argument suppose that T -1 is bounded. Then by
Problem 58, T T -1 = 7 is compact, but the identity is not compact unless
X is finite dimensional.
67. (a) Let { xn} C K(XI —T) be a bounded sequence; passing to a
subsequence if necessary we may assume that {T (a:n) } converges, and since
Xxn = T(xn), that {xn} converges to some x £ X. By the continuity of T ,
T(x) = lrn in T ^ n ), (AI —T)(x) = limn(A 7—T)(xn) = 0, and x £ K(XI—T).
Thus the unit ball of K(XI — T ) is compact and, consequently, by Problem
8.33, K(XI —T) is finite dimensional.
(b) For the sake of argument suppose there is a sequence {xn} such
that ||(7 — T )(x n)|| < ||x„ — xnK\\/n\ in particular, xn —xni< ^ 0, and if
Vn = (xn- x nK)/\\xn- x nK\\, | | (7 -T )(y n)|| < 1 /n , and so ( I - T ) ( y n) ->■ 0.
Now, by the compactness assumption there is a subsequence {ynk} of {y n}
such that {T(ynk)} converges in Y, and so ynk (Vnk T(ynk)) + T(ynk)
converges to some y with ||y|| = 1. Then by the continuity of T, y —T(y) =
limfc(ynfc — T(ynk)) = 0 and y € K(I — T). Thus we have shown that
((xnk - xnK)/\\xnk - XnKII) - y -¥ 0, or, in other words,
( Xnk ~ x n K ) + l|xnfc — X n K || y _
\\Xnk - X n K \\
and, in particular, ||(a:nfc -xnkj() + \\xnk - xUIck ||y|| < ||xnfc - xnkj< || for
sufficiently large k, and this cannot happen by the definition of {xnkj<},
since xnkj< + \\xnk - xnkK \\y e K(I - T) is closer to xnk than xnkj(.
74. (a) iff (b) Necessity first. Since T is compact, given e > 0, there
is a finite e-net of balls for T(Bx(0, 1)), i.e., T(Bx{ 0 , 1)) C Ufe=i Ry{yk^e)-
Let F = s p { y i ,. . . ,y n}; F is a finite-dimensional subspace of R(T) with
dimension < n and d,(y, F) < e for all y G R(T). It then readily follows that
IKf °T|| < e.
Conversely, note that T(Bx( 0 ,1 )) is a bounded subset of Y that lies
within an e-neighborhhood of a bounded subset of F. And, since F is
finite dimensional, bounded subsets of F are totally bounded, T(Bx( 0 ,1 ))
is contained in the union of finitely many balls of radius 2e in Y, and T is
compact.
Y* —> X* is compact, given e > 0, by
(b) iff (c) Necessity first. Since T* :
(a) there is a finite-dimensional subspace Z of X* such that ||7xz o T*|| < e.
Let W = Z x = {x G X : £(x) = 0 for all l G Z}\ W is a closed linear
subspace of X. By linear algebra, W has finite codimension in X equal to
the dimension of Z , and there is a natural isomorphism between {X/W)*
and Z. In particular, W 1- = Z in this case, since Z c W 1- automatically,
Solutions 415
and Z and W L ~ {X/W)* have the same finite dimension. Let A : W —> X
be the inclusion mapping; then (T o A)* = A* o T*, where by Problem 176,
A* corresponds to the restriction mapping from X* onto W* ~ xyw1-
=
X*/Z. By construction ||A* oT*\\ < e, which implies that ||T o A|| < e. In
other words, ||T|iy|| < e.
F be the subspace T(V) of Y. Since by Problem
Sufficiency next. Let
8.167(b) with e = 1 there, each x € X can be written as x = v + w
with v £ V, w £ W and ||w||x < 3||a;||x-, it follows that ||7TF(2"'(a:))||y/jp <
||TH||y < 3e||a;||j)c- Thus (b), and hence (a), holds.
85. For the sake of argument suppose T is one such mapping. Then
with £n the n-th coordinate functional on £°°, i.e., £n(x) = xn, x E £°°,
n = 1 , 2 , . . . , observe that, since x E K(T) iff £n(T(x)) = 0 for all n, K{T) =
n nK(en oT).
Now, we claim that cq cannot be expressed as the countable intersection
of kernels of continuous linear functionals on f ° . {Na}aei
To see this let
denote the uncountable family of infinite subsets of N such that Na fl Np is
finite whenever constructed in Problem 1.56, and to each a E I assign
the £°° sequence xa = XNa, i.e., x “ = 1 if n E Na and x “ = 0 otherwise.
W e claim that if cq C K{L) for a bounded linear functional I on f ° ,
then {a E I : L(xa) ^ 0 } is countable. To see this let An = {a E
I : |L(x«)| > 1/n}, n = 1, 2, . . . , pick distinct elements <21, . . . , of
An, and let x = J2j=iSgn(L(xa)))xa}\ clearly L(x) > k/n. Now con
sider M j = Naj \ U i j : j N ai, 1 < j < k. Then Naj \ Mj is finite and
if x = l ] j = 1 sgn (L(xai))xMj, x — x E co and L(x) = L(x). Moreover,
since the Mj are pairwise disjoint, it follows that ||x||oo = 1, and thus
k/n < L{x) = L(x) < ||L||. Hence An has at most n\\L\\ elements and
{a E I : L(xa) ^ 0 } is countable.
Now, if {Ln} C £°°* and C = {a E I : Ln(xa) ^ 0 for some n } =
U n{ a € I : Ln(xa) 7^ 0 }, then C is countable, I \ C 7^ 0, and, therefore, for
some a E I, xa E f|nK(Ln). Hence co ^ f j nK(Ln).
Note that, in particular, co is not complemented in £°°.
9 0 . (a) ||Ln|| = n.
(b) Since each x in coo has vanishing terms after some N = Nx, \Ln(x)\ <
|®A:| for all n, and, therefore, {x E coo : supn |Ln(x)| < 00} = coo-
On the other hand, supn ||Ln|| = 00, and the conclusion of the uniform
boundedness principle does not hold. Consequently, coo is of first category
in itself.
9 5 . (c) implies (a) For the sake of argument suppose that limsupn ||Tn ||
= oo. Then there is a strictly increasing sequence n* such that ||Tnfc || > 2k
for allk, and so there exist {xnk} C B with norm 1 such that ||Tnfc(ænfc)||x >
2k, or \\Tnk(xnk/2 k)\\x > 1. Now, since J2k I\xnk/1 k\\B < oo, by assumption
\\Tnk{xnj2k)\\x —>■0 , which is not the case.
96. Necessity is clear: Since Y is bounded we have supyey \L(y)\ <
||L|| supygy ||y|| < oo for each L £ X*. Conversely, let y € F and put
y** = Jx(y)- Since y**(L) = L(y) for L £ X* we have \y**(L)\ = \L(y)\ < oo
for each L £ X*, and, consequently, {y**} C X** is pointwise bounded, i.e.,
bounded at each L £ X*. Now, since X* is a Banach space, by the uniform
boundedness principle {y**} is norm bounded and ||y**||x«» < c for some
constant c > 0, for all y £ Y. Finally, since ||2/||j>f = ||y**||x**i Y c X is
bounded.
9 8 . For the sake of argument suppose that the statement is true. Define
the linear functionals Ln on V by Ln(p) = cio + ai + ••• + an. Then, if
p(t) = ao + a it H---------1- dmi m, \Ln(p)\ < (m + l)||p|| < oo for all n, and by
Problem 97, {||Ln ||} is bounded. However, if pn(t) = 1 + t + t2 H---------1 - t n,
then ||p„|| = 1 and Ln(pn) = (n + l)||p„||. Hence n + 1 = |L„(pn)|/||p„|| <
ll^nll < c for all n, which is not the case.
9 9 . Only (c) implies (a) offers any difficulty. For fixed x € B, let
Jx(T(x)) = T(x)**. Then L(T(x)) = Jx {T(x))(L) for each L £ X*, and,
consequently, sup^g-y |Jx(T(x))(L)\ = sup^g^- |L(T(x))| < oo for each L £
X*. Now, by the uniform boundedness principle applied to X* it follows
that supTg7-1|Jx(T(a:))(L)|| < oo and since ||T(a:)||A' = ||‘7 x ( î 1(x))||x**, also
suprgTllT (æ)IU < oo. Now, this estimate is true for each x £ B and by
the uniform boundedness principle, sup^g-y ||T|| < oo.
102 . Since (b) implies (a) follows readily, we prove (a) implies (b).
Consider the Banach space cq(B) introduced in Problem 8.41, and let Tn,T
Solutions 419
m =
1- 1, and onto, and has a bounded inverse. By the first part of the argument
T is open and by Problem 8.159(d), T is open.
1 0 8 . Suppose that G is not of first category in B; then G is of second
category in B. Let X n = {x £ B : supj'gj- ||T(x)||x < « } ; each X n is closed
and G = {JnXn. Therefore by the Baire category theorem, there exists
no > 0 such that Xno contains a ball B ( x q , r ), say. Now, if x £ 5 ( 0 , r),
||T(aO|U < ||T(x - « 0)||x + ||T(x0)|U < no + n 0 = 2n0, and, if x £ B,
r x / 2||x|| £ 5 ( 0 , r) and ||T(a;)||x < (4no/r)||x||B for all T £ T. Hence x £ G
and G = B.
This is an equivalent formulation: If supTejr ||T|| = oo, there exists a
“point of resonance” , i.e., x £ B such that supTej- ||T(x)||x = oo.
109. {Gm} of (good) subsets of B given by
Consider the sequence
Gm = {x £ B : limsupn ||T™(x)||xm < o o }, ni = 1, — A s in Problem
108 it readily follows that each Gm is of first category in B. Since B is
complete, by the Baire category theorem we get that A = B\ |Jm Gm is of
second category in B.
110 . (a) Since T is not onto, from the open mapping theorem it follows
that R(T) is of first category in B\. Since R(T) is dense in B\, the interior
of R(T) is nonempty, and so R(T) is not nowhere dense in B\.
Bx be the closed unit ball in X. Suppose that T(Bx) is nowhere
(b) Let
dense. Then T(X) = (JnT(nBx) = \JnnT(Bx) is a countable union of
nowhere dense sets and, hence, of first category. On the other hand, if
the convex set F — T(Bx ) has nontrivial interior, then it contains a ball
5 y ( 0,r ) for some r > 0. The usual proof of the open mapping theorem
gives that T(X) = Y and T is onto.
111.Observe that for p < q < oo, Lq(I) C I f (I) and the inclusion
mapping J : Lq(I) —> I f (I) is bounded. Moreover, since Lq(I) contains the
continuous functions, it is dense in I f (I). By Problem 110, Lq{I) is of first
category in I f {I), but not nowhere dense there.
113. For the sake of argument suppose that T is onto. Then by the
open mapping theorem T~l is bounded, and by Problem 65 this is not the
case.
is only one y with this property and so T(x) = y and by the closed graph
theorem T is continuous.
B and y e B\ be such that xn —> x in B and T{xn) —>
1 1 5 . Let {a;n} C
y in B\. Then for all L G B * it follows that L(y) = limnL(T(xn)) —
limn ,?(.£)(xn) = S(L)(x) = L(T(x)). Hence, since B* separates points in
B\, T(x) = y and T is bounded by the closed graph theorem. Finally, since
B separates points in B*, S = T*.
118. First observe that by scaling, in this case multiplying through
by 2- n , it follows that B 2( 0 , l / 2 n) C 5 i ( 0 , r / 2 n) + H 2(0, l / 2 n+1) for all
n > 1. Now let ||y||2 < 1, and y\ = y. Then, if \\yn \\2 < l / 2 n _1, we have
Vn = xn + yn+1, where ||xn||i < r /2n_1 and ||y„+i||2 < l / 2n for all ra > 1.
Now, by completeness, there exists x G X such that limn ^ j j =1 Xf. = x
in ( X , || • ||i) and, therefore, by the continuity of 7, lim nYk=xxk = x in
{X, || • ||2). Moreover, since y = Yk=xxk + Vn+x and limn ||y„ +1||2 = 0,
then limn £ £ = i z n = y in ( X , || • ||2) , and x = y. Hence, ||y||i = ||a;||i <
Y^n I W I i < 2r and B2 (0, 1) C fi i ( 0 ,2 r ) . Now, since for any 0 ^ y € X,
y/(2||y||2) has || • ||2 norm < 1, then ||y||i < 4r||y||2. Finally, the continuity
of I gives that ||y||2 < c||y||i for all y € X, and the norms are equivalent.
Indeed, along the lines of (a), W is a closed subspace of L°°(X) and by the
open mapping theorem there is a constant c such that ||x||oo < c ||x||p for
x e W. Thus (X , || • Hoo) is isomorphic to ( X , || • ||p) with p < oo, which is
separable, and as before ( X , || • ||oo) is finite dimensional.
121 . (g) Observe that there exists c > 0 such that ||m||oo < c ||m||2 for
x e X. First, if 1 < p < 2, by (c), ||x||oo < A/||x||p < M||a:||2. And, if
2 < p < oo, ||ar||p < IM I ^ IM lo o 2^ < \\x\\2 P(M ||z||p) 1-2/ p, and, therefore,
IMIp < M p/ 2-1 ||x||2, and so by (c) again, ||x||oo < M p/ 2||m||2.
Let {e ^ }, 1 < k < K, be an ONS for X C L2 (I) and note that for x =
.1
H E A№ , 11*112. < |Afe|2. Hence | £ * , Afcet (i )|2 < c* £ * , |At |2
for a.e. t e l , where the exceptional null set depends on the choice of
the Xk, but by restricting ourselves to rational sequences the set can be
made independent of the Xk- Then, letting Xk - * ek(t) for each t outside
the exceptional set it follows that | lefc(0 l2|2 ^ c2 J2 k=i lefc(^)|2i or
J2k=i \ek(t)\2 < c2 for a.e. t e l . W hence integrating we get K < c2, and X
is finite dimensional.
127. For the sake of argument suppose that such a positive sequence
a exists and let T : £°° —¥ be given by T(x) = y where yn = OnXn for
Solutions 423
all n; T is bounded with ||T|| < an- Moreover, since a has the slowest
rate of decay for convergent sequences, given a convergent sequence y, the
sequence x with terms xn = yn/an for all n is bounded, T(x) = y, and T is
onto. Thus, T is surjective and, by the open mapping theorem, open.
Next observe that if S : X —> Y is a bounded open mapping between
Banach spaces X and Y, then the preimage of a dense subset in Y is dense
in X. To see this let A C Y be dense. Then for U C X open, S(JJ) is open
in Y and hence has nontrivial intersection with A, and since U D 5- 1 (^4) 7 ^ 0
for an arbitrary U, 5 _ 1 (^4) is dense in X.
lx under T is dense in
In particular, the preimage of a dense subset of
£°°. Now, applying this observation to the dense subspace t 1 consisting of
sequences with finitely many nonzero terms, it follows that this subspace is
dense in (9°, which is not the case.
1 2 9 . (a) The statement is true.
(b) The statement is false. Let xn(t) = yn(t) = n 1/,2in_1, n > 1. Then
||a;n || = ||3/n|| = n - 1 / 2, and xn, yn -> 0 in
X. So, if B were jointly continuous,
it would follow that B(xn,yn) —¥ B( 0 ,0 ) = 0, but this is not the case since
B(xn, yn) = n J"q t2n~ 2 dt — n /(2n —1) —> 1/2 as n ->• 00.
1 3 0 . For y € B y ( 0 ,1), let Ty : X —> Z be the linear operator given
by Ty(x) = T (x , y). Then by the continuity of T for x fixed, ||T3/ (a:)||^ <
c(a;)||y||y < c(x), and, therefore, sup^g^y^,!) \\Ty(x)^z < c(x) for each x G
X. Hence by the uniform boundedness principle ||Tj,|| < c < 00 for a
constant c > 0 and all y G B y (0 ,1 ). Therefore ||T(«,y)||^ = ||T2/ (x)||^ <
cHxllx for all x G X and y G B y ( 0 , 1). Now, Ty(x) is homogenous in y,
i.e., T\y(x) = \Ty(x) for each scalar A, and, therefore, since y' — y/||y||y G
B y ( 0 ,l ) , T(x,y ) = \\y\\YT{x,y') and \\T(x,y)\\z < c||a;|Ulli/||y for all x G
X ,y e Y .
Then, by bilinearity T(x0, yo) - T(x, y) = T(x0, yo - y) + T(x0 - x, y),
and, therefore, by the triangle inequality and the above estimate,
134. For the sake of argument suppose that T -1 exists and is bounded.
Then by Problem 133(b), ||T(*)|| > c||a:|| for some c > 0 and all x G
D(T), and in particular, ||T(a:n)|| > c for all n, which is not the case since
T(xn) 0.
424 19. Normed Linear Spaces. Linear Operators
converges. Then if A is a scalar such that limn ||Tn ||1/ ra < |A|_ 1 , it fol
lows that limn ||(AT)n ||1/ n < 1, and, therefore, I — XT is invertible and
( / — A T )-1 = ¿ £ 1 0 AnTn. This result is known as Neumann’s formula.
148. {Pn} converges to (I —T)~l.
1 5 0 . Let R = ||T||. Then for |r| > R,
||r* - T(*)|| > |M l - ||T(*)|| | > (|r| - u n i) N 1 ,
155. T \lq
Let be given by T(x) = y where y\ = 0 and yn =
* n_ i /2 for
n > 2; then ||T(*)||P = 2-1 ||*||p and ||r|| < 1. Now, if * is
such that * — T(x) = e\ = ( 1, 0 , . . . ) , then xn = 21-n for all n > 1. Thus
x€iP\P0.
1 5 7 . The equation is solvable for |A| < 1 /2 .
T(xn) —pn and limnyn = 0 , xn x'0 and, consequently, T(xn) -> T(x'0).
Thus x'0 = T(xo) and x'0 G K(I —T). Then, by the minimality of the norm
of the solution xn> it follows that \\xn — Xq|| > ||xn || = 1> and {xn} does not
converge to x’Q, which is not the case. Thus ||x||/||y|| is bounded and the
desired inequality follows with c = sup(||a;||/||y||).
Prom this result it follows at once that, if the equation (7 — T)(x) = y
has a unique solution for every y G B\, then the solution is stable under
perturbations, i.e., there exists a constant C such that, if ||yi — 2/ 2||.Bi < £,
the corresponding solutions x\ and x% satisfy ||xi — X2IIb < Ce. Indeed, the
unique solution is minimal, and so ||aji — b < c\\yi —2/ 21| < ce.
The observant reader will note that the fact that R(I —T) is closed
follows at once from this. Let {yn} C R(I —T ) converge to 2/0; passing to
a subsequence if necessary we may assume that \\yn — 2/ 0II < l / 2n+1 and
so Hj/n+i — Pn\\ < l / 2 n. Let xo be a minimal solution to (7 — T)(x) = 2/1
and xn a minimal solution to (7 — T)(x) = yn+i —yn, n = 1 ,2 , — Then
||ar„|| < c\\yn+i - 2/nII < c /2 n, and, therefore, I W I converges. Then,
if x' = ZZLo Xk> it follows that (7 - T)(x') = limn ¿ f c = 0 (7 - T)(xk) =
limn(j/i + i2k=i(Vk+i ~ Vk)) = limn yn+i = yo, and y0 € R(I - T ), which is
therefore closed.
160. Note that this result implies that if a; —T(x) = 0 only has the
trivial solution x = 0, then L —T*(L) = l is solvable for all i.
1 6 3 . By Problem 133, ||T(rc)|| > c||a:||. Let e = c / 2. Then
(ü) \\xn\\x < filthily, (iii) ||T(x„) - y„||y < en, and (iv) yn + 1 = yn -
T{xn). W e proceed as follows. Let y\ = y; since ||yi||y < 1, by assumption
there exists x\ with the required properties. Then let j/2 = yi — T(x i),
M y < e. In general, if yn has been picked with ||yn ||y < en let y' =
£ 1-n -î/n £ B y (0 ,1 ). Then by assumption there exists x' e Bx( 0, r) such that
y - T(x')\\y < £. If we now put xn — en~ 1 x' and yn+1 = y n —T(xn), the
required properties are satisfied.
S*(£n)(z) and so \T*(£n)(x)\ < ||z|| < oo for each n. But as in Problem 94,
supn ||T*(^n)||x* < oo, which is not the case.
182. C : X —>■ Y = L°°(Q) be given by C(x) = S(x) for each
(c) Let
x € X. Now, if Xk —>• x in X and C(Xk) —> y in Y, then yk = C'(xfc) =
S(xk) -¥ S(x) = C(x) in Y , and with yk —> y this gives y = C(x). Thus C
is continuous, so Xk —> x in X implies uniform convergence (L°° norm) for
S(xk) —> S(x), since the continuous functions are dense in X, each S(x) is
the uniform limit of continuous functions, and hence continuous.
< E L jv+ 1 l|P»(w)ll ^ E fcljv +1 l|P»(lfc)Hi < E L jv+ i lll/fclli < e uniformly
in n. Thus ||z - E L i Vkh = suPn IIPn(z - E f = i Vk)II < £ for N sufficiently
large and z = J2 kVk in (-X) || ■ ||i), which is therefore complete.
The equivalence of the norms follows from the inverse mapping theorem.
192. W ith Jb : B —>• B** the natural map and Jq : B*** —> B*
its adjoint, let P = Jb * ° Jb '-, we claim that P : B*** —>■ B*** is well-
defined and bounded. First, for all L G B*, since for any x G B we have
J g (L )(x ) = Jb (x )(L) = L(x), it follows that Jb \b * — Ib *■ Moreover, since
Jb (L) = L for all L G B*, P\b * = Ib *- Note that the argument actually
shows that R(P) C B* and P 2 = P . Lastly, to compute the norm of P ,
since natural maps are isometries, ||P|| < ll ^ l l l|JSII = ll*-|| \\Jb \\ = i . On
the other hand, ||P|| > ||P|b *|| = 1.
195. (b) First note that for £ G K(T *), £(T(x)) = T*(£)(x) = 0 for
all ж G X. Let ф : K(T*) - » (Y/R(T))* be defined by ф(£) = A where
A([y]) = £(y) for all [y] G Y/R(T); since £(y + T(x)) = £(y) for all x G X, it
is always the case that A is a well-defined linear functional on Y/R(T) with
l|A|| < №
R(T) is closed, the canonical projection 7Г : Y —> Y/R(T) is
Now, when
bounded, and given a linear functional A on Y/R(T)f let £ G Y* be defined
by £ = A ott; then ||l|| < ||A||. Then (T*£)(x) = (А о тг)(Г(ж)) = 0 for
all x G X and £ G K(T*). It is readily seen that this inverts the previous
construction.
Hilbert Spaces
Solutions
433
434 20. Hilbert Spaces
I{xn, yn) (®m> ym) | — I(* » xmi yn) |"b |(®m> yn Um) |
< C ||x„ - Xm||+ C ||y n - J/m|| -> 0
||2 xi| = J2 H^ll2 + &( {xn, zm>) < 100 + 9,900/10 = 1,090,
n=l n= 1 n /m
Thus 2Щх —хк, У —хк) < (1 - А)||у - ж.к-||2 and letting A -> 1 it follows
that Щх —хк, У - хк) < 0. Conversely, suppose that given x € H, z £ К
verifies the inequality for all у € К. Then since x —у = (x —z) + (z —y)
and Щх —z,y —z) = —9?(ж —z,z —y) it follows that ||ж— y ||2 = ||ж— z \\2 +
|\z - y ||2 — 2 Щх - z,z —y), and, consequently, ||ж- y ||2 > ||ж- z||2. Since
у £ К is arbitrary, z = хк-
(b) By (а), 3?(ж -xK,xK - у к ) > 0 and Щук - У,хк - Ук) > 0.
Thus adding, (x - у) + (ук - хк),хк - Ук) > 0, and, consequently,
Щх - у , х к - Ук) ~ ||хк - Ук\\2 > 0. Therefore
I\хк ~ Ук||2 < Щх - у , х к ~ Ук) < \\х - у|| \\хк - у к \|
and, canceling, \\хк - Ук\\ < ||ж- у||.
(c) This is the unique element хк of К such that d(0, К) = ||а;к||.
Thus ||xn — xm || —> 0 asn,m -> 00, and, therefore, {xk} is Cauchy and
converges to x £ K, say, where the minimum is attained. Now, if the
minimum is attained at x and xo, say, as above ||(x — x o ) / 2||2 < J(x) +
J(x0) — 277 = 0.
27. Let xk € K denote the closest element of K to x. Then by Problem
24(a), 3?(x —X K , x n — x k ) < 0, and, consequently,
Therefore ||æ—x k \\2 < —$1(x —x k , xn—x) and since by the weak convergence
the right-hand side tends to 0, the left-hand side, or ||x — x k \\, is 0, and
x = xk G K.
2 8 . Fix r > 0 and write H = \Jy€H Br(y); since H is separable there
are countably many balls such that H = (JkBr(yk). Since y is not the
trivial measure, y(Br(yk)) > 0 for some k and by translation all the balls
of radius r have nonzero measure equal to y(Br(yk)). Let c = y(Bro/^0 (y))
for any (and hence all) y € H and observe that if {e n} is an O N B for H,
then BTQ / 30(en/2 ) c Bro(0) for all n. By the Pythagorean theorem the balls
B ro/3 o (e n /2 ) are pairwise disjoint and so y(Bro(0)) > Yhnc = 00 unless y is
identically 0.
34. (a) Clearly {xn} is an ONS. Now, since ||yn||2 = ( 1—4-n ) + (2- n )2 =
1 and as a simple computation shows (ym, yn) = 0 if mj^n, {yn} is an ONS.
Next, suppose that x = £ n Anen 6 X fi Y . Since x G X the odd Fourier
coefficients of x vanish and since x = £ n Mn(\/l — 4_n ein + 2~ne2n-i) € Y
it follows that pn2~n = 0, and so pn = 0 for all n, and x = 0. Finally, we
claim that {en} C X + Y and so X + Y is dense in H. Indeed, e-in = xn G X
and e2n-i = 2n(yn — (1 — 4-n )1/2z n) 6 X + Y for all n.
(b) Since £ n l(^> e„)|2 < oo, v G H. For the sake of argument suppose
that v = £ n anxn + J2nbnyn G X + Y. Then 2~k = (v,e2k- i ) = bk2~k,
which is impossible since it implies that bk = 1 for all k, and the series
defining y cannot converge. Therefore X + Y is dense but not closed in H.
35. The statement is not always true. Let L be the linear functional
on l\ given by L(x) = £ n n- 1 xn. Since |L(x)| < (7r/-\/6) ||x|| for all x G £q,
L is continuous. Now, since en G Iq and L(en) = 1/n for all n, were xl to
exist it would follow that (x l )u = 1/n for all n, and s o ® i G f 2 \ ^ .
36. B y Problem 30, H has a countable ONB {en}, say. Let L(en) =
K. Then £ 2 = 1 N 2 = £ 2 = 1 hL{ek) = L ( £ £ =1 bkek) < ||L|| || £ £ = 1 6fcefe||
= ll^ll ( E 2= i N 2)1/2 and £ 2=1 |6fe|2 < ||L||2 for all n. Hence £ fc |6fc|2 < oo
and £ 2=1 bkek converges to xL G H, say, with ||xi,|| = ( £ fc |6fe|2)1/2 <
||L||. Now, given x G H, let xn = (x,en); since £ 2_ i xkek -4 x by the
linearity and continuity of L it follows that L(x) = limn L ( £ 2= i %kek) =
limn £ 2=1 xkbk = (x , x l )- Finally, by Cauchy-Schwarz |L(x)| = |(x,xi,)|
< ||z|| | M and ||L|| < ||x l ||. The uniqueness of xl is clear.
37. Let L be a continuous linear functional on a Hilbert space H. If
L = 0, xl = 0 will do. Otherwise K (L ) is a proper closed subspace of H and
by Problem 8.63(a), K (L )x is 1-dimensional; then K(L)1- = sp {y}, y ^ 0,
and K(L) = i f (I/)-11- = yx . Thus the linear functional £(x) = (x, y), x G H,
satisfies K(£) = K(L) and by Problem 8.65(a) there exists A ^ 0 such that
L = X£, i.e., L(x) = A (x,y) = ( x ,A y) = (x , xl ) with xl = A y. Clearly
l|£|| = II*l ||.
38. Let y G X, the completion of X discussed in Problem 12. Since
L(x) = (x ,y)i is a continuous linear functional on X by assumption there
is xl € X such that (x,y )i = L (x) = (x , x l ) = (x , xl ) i for all x e X. Now,
by the continuity of the inner product, (z , xl —y)i = 0 for all z G X and,
consequently, y = xl G X. Therefore X = X and X is complete.
39. The following is an example of disjoint convex subsets of a Hilbert
space H that cannot necessarily be separated by a continuous linear func
tional on H: In H = L 2([—1, 1]) consider X y = {x G H : x is continuous
and x( 0) = 7 } , 7 6 1 ; for a / /3, X a,Xy are disjoint convex subsets of H
that cannot be separated by a continuous linear functional on H.
Solutions 439
Now, in our case, note that C = A — B is closed, convex, and does not
contain 0. Let *o denote the projection of 0 on C and X = xq/2 + Xq . Then
X separates C and { 0} and so A and B are separated.
40. Since X is a Hilbert space in its own right by the Riesz-Frechet
representation theorem there is a unique xe G X with ||*^|| = ||^|| such
that l(x) = (*, X() for all a; € X. Let L be given by L(x) = (x,xe) for
x G H; then L\x = t and ||L|| = ||x^|| = ||^||. Suppose now that L\ is
another linear functional on H such that L\\x = t and ||Li|| = ||^||. Then
for all x G H, L\(x) = ( * ,* i ) where x\ G H with ||*i|| = ||Li||. Since
L\\x = i we have (x, xi — xe) = 0 for all x G X, i.e., * i — xe G X ± . Hence
|K||2 = HLxll2 = ||*i||2 = Urn - xe\\2 + | M | 2 = ||*i - *,||2 + ll^ll2. Therefore
||*i — xe\\2 = 0, * i = xe, and the extension is unique.
41. Since H = X © X -1-, each * G H can be written as * = P(x) + Q(x),
and so L(x) is linear, L\x = t and ||L|| > ||f ||. On the other hand, ||L(*)|| <
ll^ll II-PII 11*11= IKII 11*11since ll^ll = !•
Suppose now that L i is another bounded linear functional on H such
that L\\x = t and ||Li|| = ||£||. Then by the Riesz-Frechet representation
theorem, Li(x) = ( * , b) with ||6|| = ||Li||. Then since b = P(b) + Q(b), for
ally e X, L(y ) = Li(y) = {y, P(b)) + (y,Q(b)) = (y,P(b )). This gives
||L|| = ||P(6)||. Now, since ||L|| = ||Li||, then ||Li|| = ||P(6)||. And, since
¡¡Li || = ||6|| this implies that Q(b) = 0 and so L i( * ) = (*, b) — (x,P(b )) =
(P(x), b) = L(x) (for all * € XI)
42. (a) Since n~2 converges, by Problem 20, *o = Yhn^-/n)en G
H and we can define the linear functional L(x) = (*,*o ), * € H. Then
L(en) = l/n for all n and ||L|| = ||*o|| = 7r/\/ 6.
43. The statement is true. Let L be a continuous linear functional
on L 2(Rn) that vanishes on V ; by Riesz-Frechet there exists h G L 2(Mn)
with ||h||2 = ||L|| such that L(g) = JRn g(y)h(y) dy for all g G L 2(Mn)
and, in particular, L(g) = fRn f(x)g(x) etx'^ dx = 0 for all £ G R n. Now,
by the inversion formula for the Fourier transform, f(x)g(x) = 0 a.e. and
since g(x) ^ 0 a.e. this gives / = 0 a.e. and so L is the zero functional.
Consequently, by Problem 8.95(b), V is dense in L 2(Rn).
44. The statement is true. Let V = sp {rxf : x G R n} and L a con
tinuous linear functional on L 2(Rn) that vanishes on V. B y the Frechet-
Riesz representation theorem there exists h G L 2(Rn) with \\h\\2 = ||L|| such
that L(g) = fRn g(y)h(y) dy for all g G L 2(Rn) and, in particular, on V,
fRn / ( * + y)h(y) dy = 0 for all * G R n. Thus the convolution f *h vanishes
everywhere on R n and so f(£)h(£) = 0 for all £ G R n. But since /(£) ^ 0 a.e.
this implies that h(£) = 0 a.e. and by the inversion formula for the Fourier
440 20. Hilbert Spaces
K- 1 K- 1
W
x - y\\2 = J2 ll«fc - Vk\\2 < J2 ( e ß K ) 2 = (e/ 2 ) 2
k=-K k=—K
as desired.
50. Note that for an ONB {en} for if, the ONS {e2 , . . . , en, ...} , and
x G H , we have J2^=2ix>en)e-n = x - {x, ei)ei.
51. (a) The statement is false since (1, —1 ,0 ,...) _L y„ for all n.
(b) The statement is true: x ± zn iff xn = 2n~2xi for all n, and so x G i 2
only if x\ = 0 and then x = 0 .
52. For the sake of argument suppose that { / n} is not complete and
let 0 7 ^ x € if satisfy {x,fn} = 0 for all n. Then ||x||2 = J2n |(x, en)|2 =
- fn) |2 < (¿„Ik n - /nil2) ||x||2 < |M|2, which cannot happen
since x / 0 .
Solutions 441
53. Pick N such that Yhn>N llen —/nil2 < 1 and let X denote the closed
span of {ejv+i,ejv+2 > in H\ by Problem 52, X is the closed span of
{ / w+ i >/jv+2 >* ••} in H. Now, let 1 < k < N. Since H = X © X-1, fk €
X 1- - sp{ei,. . . , eN} and fk = Sn=i ^nen- Furthermore, since { / i , . . . , / jv}
is an ONS and, in particular, linearly independent, by linear algebra the
N x N matrix A = (A£), 1 < k,n < N, is nonsingular. Hence if (/fc,x) = 0
for some x G H and all k, 0 = (fk,x) — J2n=i ^n (en,x), 1 < k < N, and,
consequently, since the determinant of the above homogenous system is not
0 , the system only admits the trivial solution and (ei,x) = ... — (ejy, x) = 0 .
Finally, suppose that (x, fn) = 0 for all n. Combining the above results,
by Bessel’s inequality ||x||2 = £ n |(z,e„ ) | 2 = T,n=N+i l(®»en ~ fn)|2 <
llæll2 T^= n+l IIe« _ /"H 2 < llæll2>and so x = 0 and { /„ } is complete.
54. If n < m , {fn, fm) = 0 and the f n are pairwise orthogonal. Similarly,
||/n ||2 = (n2 + n)_1(n + n2) = 1 for all n, and { / n} is an ONS.
Finally, we claim that the /„ span H. Let L be a bounded linear func
tional on H that vanishes on X = s p {/i,... , / n, ...} . If L (/i) = 0, then
L(ei —e-i)/V2 = 0 and L(ei) = L(e2 ). Next, we proceed by induction and
prove that if L(ei) = ... = L(en), then L(en+i) = L(ei). Indeed L(fn) =
(n2 + n)_ 1 / 2 L(X)L 1 ek - nen+i) = (n2 + n)- 1 / 2 (nL(ei) - nL(en+i)) = 0
and, consequently, L(ei) = L(en+i). Now, let x = J2nen/n € H. Since L
is continuous, L{x) = lim/v en/n) = limjv(X^Li n- 1 )L(e1 ) and this
expression diverges unless L(ei) = 0 in which case L(en) = 0 for all n and
L = 0. Therefore L is the 0 functional and by Problem 8 .9 5 (b), X = H.
55. (b) Let / 1 = e\ and
. r i r 1
f n — \l . + ,----- — j- Cn+1 ) n — 2, . . . .
y n+ 1 Vn + 1
Then x £ X and ||x—y ||2 = \r)\2/ K -> 0 as K —> oo. So M is dense but not
closed in X and = {0}.
Next, Mi is the kernel of a bounded linear functional on £2 and, therefore,
is closed in £2. By taking relative topologies Mi C\X is closed but not dense
in X. A direct proof also works. Let x E X be a limit point of Mi and
given e > 0 , pick m E Mi such that ||x —m\\ < e; then by Cauchy-Schwarz
IEfc®fc/*l = ILfcZfcA - E*w*fc/fcl < Efcl^fc-^fclA < (EfcA:_2)1/2e.
Since this is true for arbitrary e > 0, E kxk/k = 0 and x £ M i, which is
therefore closed. Now, we claim that y E Mj1 iff y — y i( l, 1 / 2 ,1 /3 ,...), and
so y E X iff y = 0. This is readily seen because the sequence {ei —n en} is
in M i, and so yi —nyn = 0 for all n when y £ Mj1 . Then y is in X iff y = 0
and M j1 = { 0}. Hence X ^ M i © M 1 = M i.
Finally, M2 = K(L) where L is the linear functional given by L(en) =
1/Vn; since {l/^ /n } ^ £2, L is not bounded and, consequently, M2 is dense
but not closed in X. A direct proof of the density of M2 goes as follows. Let
y E M2 and N be such that yu = 0 for all k > N. Let C = Zk=i Vk/'/k,
for n > N define An = E^=/v 1/&, and let x be given by
Uki k < N,
Xk < —C/An\/k, N < k <n
0, n <k.
(x,h) . (x,h) .
P(x) = x G X ,
( /l ,/ l ) / l + ( / 2 , / 2) 72’
= »— V ] / x{t)ek{{t + 27x£)/n) dt
2n n 7^>J °
1 p2n 1 . v _____________
Let $(n,N,t) denote the function multiplying x(t) in the integral above.
To compute limn(27r) -1 / Q 27r x(t)$(n, N, t) dt we consider two cases. If k = 0
the limit is do and if A: ^ 0, by Weyl’s lemma, the limit is fg e~lk2ir dx = 0,
and so
j r2ir ^ p2ir j p2n
1 N 2 i N i
I ^ vXnk — pj2 ^ ^ lla'n/sll + jy2 'y . {x nkix nm) = I n + J n i
k= 1 k= 1 1<kjim<N
113. Let Pn denote the projection onto sp{ei,. . . , en} and put Tn =
PnoT\ each Tn is of finite rank, bounded, and T(x)—Tn{x) = (J—Pn)oT{x).
Since I —Pn = Rn o Ln, by Problem 1 1 2 it follows that ||T(x) —Tn(x)|| <
||Æn||||Ln||||T(x)|| -> 0 as n oo.
115. By assumption and Cauchy-Schwarz we get ||Tj| = |(T(xo),xo)| <
||T(xo)|| ||xo|| < Ill’ll) so |(T(xo),xo)| = ||T(xo)|| ||x0||. The conclusion
follows from Problem 7.
116. The statement is true. Let {en} be the standard ONB for &
and A an uncountable Hamel basis for l2 that contains the en. Then pick
e € A \ {en} and define T on the e\ by
1 , ex = e,
T(ex) =
0 , otherwise.
For x £ H write x = YlxeA æAeA> where the sum is actually finite, and let
T(x) = X^AeA x\T{ex)- Then T is linear and T(en) = 0 for all n. Since
e = lim/v Yln=i(e>en) en, if T were bounded it would follow that 1 = T(e) =
limjv En=i(e- en)T(en) = 0 , which is not the case.
117. Let Tn(x) = (x, en)en, x € H.
118. Yes. For an integer k let T : H —> H be given by T{x) =
(x,ei + ••• + ejk)ei. Then T(en) = e\ if n < k and T(en) = 0 other
wise. Thus ||T(en)|| < 1 for all n, and if Xk = (ei -I------ 1- &k)/Vk, ||x/.|| = 1,
and ||T|| > ||T(xfc)|| = Vk.
119. Let 1 = {n € N : en e X }. Since T\x = lx it follows that
J 2 n e = Yhnex Ke^>T(en))|2 < oo. Therefore X can only contain finitely
many e„, and, consequently, is finite dimensional.
12 1. Given x we must find t so that x + tv -L u. This is equivalent
to t = —(x,u)/(v,u), which gives T(x) = x — ((x,u)/(v,u))v. T is clearly
linear. Moreover, since ||T(x)|| < (1 + (||u|| IMI/|(tt>v)|) )||x||, T is bounded.
We claim that R(T) = u2-. Indeed, from the definition of T, R(T) C tr1.
Moreover, if y J. u, then y = T(y + 0 •v) which gives the opposite inclusion.
Finally, if u, v are linearly dependent, T becomes the orthogonal projection
onto u2-.
125. (a) implies (b) Given x,y £ H and a scalar A, expanding
(T(x + Xy),T(x + Ay)) = (x + Xy,x + Ay) it follows that ||T(x)||2 +
_ = ||x||2 + $RA(x,y)_+ ||y||2. Since T is an isometry
5RA(T(x),T(y)) + \\T(y)\\2
this equation becomes 5RA(T(x),T(y)) = 3îA(x,y) for any scalar A. If H is
452 20. Hilbert Spaces
K -1
^ 2 ç—inka _ 1 e- inKa - 1
K e~ina - 1 ‘
k= 0
ll-Stfiy)- coeo|| < e/2 for all K sufficiently large, we have ||5 ^(x)-coeoll < £
for those K. Thus { 5^ ( x ) } converges to the constant function co = (x> eo) =
(1/27 t) J q* x(t)dt, i.e., the average of x.
129. Necessity first. Let R(T ) = sp{a;o}, 0 ^ xq g X. Then T{x) =
i{x)x o where t{x) is the bounded linear functional
(c) Necessity first. For the sake of argument suppose that An 0 and
let {Anfc} be a subsequence of {A„} and y > 0 such that |AnJ > rj for all
k. Then T(enfc) = Anfc/ nfc and ||T(enfc) —T(en j)||2 = ||Anfc/ nfc —Anj/ n3 1|2 =
|AnJ 2 + |Anj.|2 > 2if. Therefore {T(enk)} has no convergent subsequence
and T is not compact.
Sufficiency next. Let T/. denote the partial sum of T of order k; is
a finite rank operator and, hence, compact. Moreover ||(T —Tfc)(x)||2 <
supfc>n |Afc|2 ||x||2, ||T - Tfc||< supfc>n |Afc|2 -> 0 and T is compact.
136. (a) The statement is false. On H = l 2 © £2 define T : H —>■ H
by T(x,y) = (0, x). Then T 2 = 0 is compact yet T, which is essentially the
identity in £2, is not.
(b) The statement is true. Let {xn} c H be bounded, i.e., ||xn||< c for
all n. Passing to a subsequence if necessary we may assume that {T*T(xn)}
converges. Now, since ||T(xn)—r(x m )||2 = (xn- x m,T*T(xn)—T*T(xm)} <
2c||T*T(a;n) — T*T(xm)\\, {T(xn)} is Cauchy, hence convergent, and T is
compact.
137. Necessity first. Observe that the sup can be taken over x €
{e i,. . . , en}1- with ||a;|| < 1 . Now, {pn} is a nonincreasing sequence bounded
below and, consequently, it converges to a limit p > 0, say. For all n
sufficiently large there exists xn € {e i,... ,en}x, ||rrn|| = 1 , such that
l№n)|| > ju/2. Since by Problem 103, xn —1 0 and T is compact, by
Problem 9.62, T(xn) 0 and p = 0.
As for sufficiency, consider the finite rank operators Tn given by Tn(x) =
£fc=i{ek,x)T(ek). Then T(x) - Tn(x) = ^ ^ i n+1 (efc,x)T(efc), and, conse
quently, ||Tn —T || = pn. Finally, since pn 0, T is the uniform limit of
finite rank operators and, consequently, compact.
142. (a) The statement is false if if is a real Hilbert space as a ±90
degree rotation in M2 shows. In the real case the condition is (T(x),y ) = 0
for all x,y in H for then, given x 6 H, picking y = T(x) it follows that
||T(x)||2 = (T(x),T(x)) = 0 and so T(x) = 0 for all x G H.
On the other hand, the statement is true if the underlying field is C.
First, observe that (T(x+Ay),x+Ay) = (T(x),x)+A(T(y),x)+A(T(x),y) +
|A|2 (T(y),y) = 0, and so A(T(y),x) + \{T(x),y) = 0 for all A G C. Picking
A = l,z we get (T(y),x) + (T(x),y ) = 0 and (T(y),x) - (T(x),y) = 0,
respectively, which together imply that (T(x),y) = 0 for all x,y G H, and
so as before T = 0.
(b) No. Consider T : M2 —>•R2 given by the matrix
Solutions 455
= 2 ^ (| | x ||2 + ||!/||2 )
for all x,y G H. Now let ||x|| = 1 be such that T(x) ^ 0 and put y =
||r(x)||-1r(x). Then ||y|| = 1 and (T(x),y) + (T(y),x) = (T(x),y) +
(y,T(x)) = 2 ||T(x)||, and, therefore, 4||T(x)|| < 277(1 + 1), or ||T(x)|| < 77,
which obviously holds when T(x) = 0. Hence sup||x||=1 ||T(x)|| = ||T|| < 77.
145. The statement is false. Let {en} be an ONB of H and Tn : H -* H
be given by Tn(x) = (x,en)ei; note that T*{y) = (y,ei)en for all n. Then
Tn(x) ->■ 0 and T*(y) —1 0 for all x,y G H, but TnT*(x) = (x, ei)ei does not
tend to 0 weakly in H.
147. Since T is compact and T* bounded, by Problem 9.58, TT* is
compact. Hence, since T = T**, T**T* is compact and by Problem 136(b),
T* is compact.
149. The only property that offers any difficulty in verifying that ||•||i
is a norm is ||T||i = 0 implies T = 0. Now, if ||T||i = 0, then (T(x),x) = 0
for all x G H with ||x|| = 1 and by Problem 142(a), T = 0. It is clear that
||T||i < ||T||. Moreover, since for a general T with adjoint T*, (T + T*)/2
and (T —T*)/2i are self-adjoint and T = (T + T*)/2 + i(T —T*)/2i, by
Problem 144, ||T||i < ||(r + T*)/2||i + |t| ||(T-T*)/2t||i < 2.
456 20. Hilbert Spaces
150. (a) Note that for x G K(T), 0 = BT(x) = I(x) — S(x), i.e.,
and the identity operator is compact on K{T). In partic
'S'lAr(T) = I \ K { T ) i
ular, the unit ball of K(T) is compact and K(T) is finite dimensional.
(b) Let {yn} C R(T) converge to y in Hi and {xn} C H such that
T(xn) = yn for all n. Now, if {||xn||} is bounded let {xnk} be a subse
quence of {xn} such that S(xnk) converges to 2 G H, say. Then xnk =
I(xnk) = BT(xnk) + S(xnk) -> B(y) + z, and, consequently, by continuity
y = limnfc T(xnk) = T(limnfc xnk) = T(B(y)+z) and y € R(T). On the other
hand, if {||xn||} is unbounded, passing to a subsequence if necessary we may
assume that ||xn|| —>■00. Also, since H = K(T) © A (T ) 1 we may assume
that xn _L K(T) for all n. Consider zn = xn/||xn||. Now, since {T(xn)}
converges, it is bounded and, therefore, T(zn) = (l/||xn||)T(xn) —>■0. Then
repeating the argument for bounded sequences, a subsequence {znk} of {zn}
converges to z, say. By the continuity of the norm ||z|| = 1 , and since
Ar(T)-L is closed, z J. K(T). Finally, by the continuity of T, T(z) = 0,
i.e., 2 € K(T), which is not possible since ||z|| = 1 . Hence R(T) is closed.
Alternatively, replacing B by (J — (S —F))_1B as in (a) we may assume
that S is of finite rank. Then if yn = T(xn) — y in H\ it follows that
xn —F(xn) = B(yn) -¥ B(y). A similar argument as above then gives that
V G R(T).
(c) First, taking adjoints we have B*T* = Ii —S^. Since H(T)-1 = K(T*)
and is compact, applying (a) to T* we get that RiT)1- = K(T*) is finite
dimensional.
151. (a) Let y = T(x) G R(T). Then for 2 G AT(T*), (y , 2 ) = (T(x), z) =
(x,T*(z)) = 0 and so R(T) C K(T*)L. Furthermore, since k It *)1 is
closed, R(T) C K(T*)L. On the other hand, if y G i?(T)-*-, 0 = (T(x),y) =
(x,T*(y)) for all x G H, and, consequently, T*(y) = 0. Thus H(T)-1- c
K(T*), and, consequently, K{T*)L c RiT)^1- = R(T), which proves (a).
(b) We apply (a) to T* in place of T and use that T** = T.
(c) Take orthogonal complements in (a) and (b).
This result also implies that if T : H —»•H is a self-adjoint linear opera
tor, then H = W ) © K{TL).
Solutions 457
Nx tn — 1 Nx 71— 1 Nx Ny Nx
d = E £ Xml/n £ £ x nUm — £ £ x nVm ^ ^ %nUn
Solutions 459
wn = ((T + il)x)n = i + ix n
N 71
2 i ^ ^ xm — 2 i 'y ] xm.
m=0
is a bounded linear functional on D(T*) with norm < ||T(v)||, and, con
sequently, by Problem 155, v G D(T**) and T**(v) = T(v) for v € D(T).
Thus T** is a closed extension of T, which is therefore closable.
Sufficiency next. For the sake of argument suppose 0 ^ vq G D^r*)^.
Then (0,wo) G G(T*)-^_and from (a) it follows that G{T*)L = W ±J- = W.
Now, it is clear that W = {(w,—v) : (v,w ) G G(T)}, and, hence, (0,vo) G
G(T), which implies by Problem 9.1 that G(T) is not the graph of a linear
operator.
(c) If T is closable, T* is densely defined and at the beginning of (b)
we checked that T C T**. In fact, there is equality, because we can use the
computation in (a) applied to T* instead of T to determine the graph of T *:
G(T**) = V 1 , where V = {(T*(x), -x ) G H x H : x G D(T*)} c H x H}.
Thus V is obtained from the graph of T* as A(G(T*)), where A is the linear
isometry A(y,w) = (w,—v). In (b) we saw that Gf(T*)J" = W and since
A(W) = G(T), this gives G(T**) = (¿(GCT* )))-1 = ¿(GCT* ) ) 1 = A(W) =
G(T). Finally, for T closable we have T* = (T**)* = T* = T* since T* is
closed.
164. Necessity first. For the sake of argument suppose that m\ = 0 and
let {xn} be such that ||xn||= 1 for all n, and ||T(xn )||2 = (T*T(xn),xn) ->■ 0.
Then 1 = ||xn||= ||T_ 1 T(icn)|| < ||T- 1 ||||T(xn)|| -¥ 0, which is not the case.
Similarly m2 > 0 .
Sufficiency next. Pick ci,C2 > 0 such that cjmi < l,C2 m2 < 1, and
define the linear operators S\ = c\T*T, S% = C2 TT*. Then Si, S 2 , I —
Si, I — S 2 are self-adjoint and ||/ — 5i|| = sup||I||=1( ( / — ciT*T)(x),x) =
1 —ci inf||a;||= 1 (T:,,T(x),x) = 1 —cimi < 1; similarly ||/ —S^H < 1. Therefore
by Problem 9.149, Si and S2 are invertible and, consequently, (T*T) - 1 and
(TT* ) “ 1 exist. Hence, since I = (T*T )-1 T*T = T T*(TT*)~1, T has a left
and right inverse and is therefore invertible. Therefore T ~ l = (T*T)_ 1 T* =
T *(T T *)-i exists.
165. Note that the result applies to T — I + SS* where S : H —»• H is
a bounded linear operator.
166. (a) Since (S*TS)* = S*TS and (S*TS(x),x ) = (TS(x),S{x)) > 0
for x G H, S*TS is positive.
(b) The proof proceeds by induction for T 2n and T 2n +1 simultaneously.
First, for n = 0, T° = I and T 1 = T are positive. Suppose next that T 2n
and T 2n+1 are positive. Then by (a), T2(n+1) = TT2nT and j ’2(n+ 1 ) + 1 =
T T 2n+1T are positive.
(c) Let b be the functional on H x H given by b(x,y) = (T(x),y).
First, for y G H, the mappping b(-,y) is linear and since T — T*, b(y,x) =
(‘T (y),x) = (x,T(y )) = (T(x),y) for all y G H, and b is hermitian. Also,
Solutions 461
is dense in H, y € D(T x*) iff (T* 1(x),y) — (x,(T* x)*(y)) and, letting
x = T*(z) we get (z,y) = (T*(z), ( T * - 1) * ^ ) ) = ( T * - 1T *(z ),y )). Thus,
Thus, since this relation holds for all y 6 H, T(x + Ax') = T(x) + AT(x').
Finally, T is an isomorphism. First, T is continuous: By Problem 134,
||T(x)|| < RT||x|| and T is bounded with ||T|| < K. Next, T is injective:
Let x € if. Then, by Cauchy-Schwarz, c||x||2 < 4>(x,x) = (T(x),x) <
||T(x)|| ||x||. Thus, if x 7^ 0, ||T(x)|| > c||x|| and, in particular, T is injective.
Next, T is onto. To see this, observe that R(T ) is closed in H. Indeed,
let {T(xn)} be a convergent sequence in R(T). Then ||T(xn) —T(xm)|| >
c||xn —xm||, and, therefore, {xn} is Cauchy, and converges to x G if, say.
By the continuity of T, T(xn) —> T(x) € R(T), and R(T) is closed. So,
to prove that T is surjective it suffices to verify that if(T)-1- = {0}. Let
x e if(T)-1-. Then, since T(x) € R(T ), 0 = (T(x),x) = <f>(x,x) > c||x||2, and
x = 0. Finally, by the inverse mapping theorem, T is a homoemorphism.
174. First, by the Riesz-Frechet representation theorem, there is a
unique yi € if with ||y£,|| = ||L|| such that L(x) = (yL,x) for all x € i f . Let
T be the mapping defined in Problem 173, put u = T ~l {yi) and observe
that 4>(u,x) = (T(u),x } = (yz,,x) = L(x) for all x € if. We claim that
u is unique. Let u' be such that x) = L(x). Then, 4>(u — u', x) = 0
for all x € if and, in particular, <j){u —u',u —u1) = 0. Then, c||u —v!||2 <
<p(u —u',u —v!) = 0 and u = v!.
Solutions 463
465
466 Index
pointwise convergence, 75
weak convergence in LP(X)> 76
set, 3
countable, 3
equivalent, 3
finite, 3
infinite, 3
Lebesgue measurable, 29
measurable, 14
uncountable, 3
Tonelli’s theorem, 94
Vitali’s theorem, 85
W k-Lp( X ) y 59
Zorn’s lemma, 4
Selected Published Titles in This Series
166 A lb e r to T orch in sk y, Problems in Real and Functional Analysis, 2015
164 T eren ce T ao, Expansion in Finite Simple Groups of Lie Type, 2015
163 G era ld T en enbau m , Introduction to Analytic and Probabilistic Number Theory, Third
Edition, 2015
162 Firas R a ssou l-A g h a and T im o Sep päläin en, A Course on Large Deviations with an
Introduction to Gibbs Measures, 2015
161 D ian e M aclag an and B ern d S tu rm fels, Introduction to Tropical Geometry, 2015
160 M ariu s O v erh olt, A Course in Analytic Number Theory, 2014
159 J oh n R . Faulkner, The Role o f Nonassociative Algebra in Projective Geometry, 2014
158 Fritz C olon iu s and W olfg a n g K liem a n n , Dynamical Systems and Linear Algebra,
2014
157 G era ld Teschl, Mathematical Methods in Quantum Mechanics: With Applications to
Schrödinger Operators, Second Edition, 2014
156 M arku s H aase, Functional Analysis, 2014
155 E m m an u el K ow alski, An Introduction to the Representation Theory of Groups, 2014
154 W ilh e lm Schlag, A Course in Complex Analysis and Riemann Surfaces, 2014
153 T eren ce T ao, Hilbert’s Fifth Problem and Related Topics, 2014
152 G a b o r Szökelyh idi, An Introduction to Extremal Kahler Metrics, 2014
151 Jen n ifer Schultens, Introduction to 3-Manifolds, 2014
150 J o e D iestel and A n g ela S p alsbu ry , The Joys of Haar Measure, 2013
149 D an iel W . S troock , Mathematics o f Probability, 2013
148 Luis B a rreira and Y akov P esin, Introduction to Smooth Ergodic Theory, 2013
147 X in g zh i Zhan, Matrix Theory, 2013
146 A a ro n N . Siegel, Combinatorial Game Theory, 2013
145 C h arles A . W eib el, The AT-book, 2013
144 Shun-Jen C h en g and W eiq ia n g W a n g , Dualities and Representations of Lie
Superalgebras, 2012
143 A lb e r to B ressan, Lecture Notes on Functional Analysis, 2013
142 T eren ce T ao, Higher Order Fourier Analysis, 2012
141 J oh n B . C on w ay, A Course in Abstract Analysis, 2012
140 G era ld Teschl, Ordinary Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems, 2012
139 J oh n B . W alsh , Knowing the Odds, 2012
138 M a ciej Z w orski, Semiclassical Analysis, 2012
137 Luis B a rreira and C lau d ia V ails, Ordinary Differential Equations, 2012
136 A rsh ak P etrosy an , H en rik S h ahgholian , an d N in a U raltseva, Regularity of Free
Boundaries in Obstacle-Type Problems, 2012
135 P ascal C h errier and A lb e r t M ilan i, Linear and Quasi-linear Evolution Equations in
Hilbert Spaces, 2012
134 J ea n -M a rie D e K ön in ck an d F loria n L u ca, Analytic Number Theory, 2012
133 Jeffrey R a u ch , Hyperbolic Partial Differential Equations and Geometric Optics, 2012
132 T eren ce T ao, Topics in Random Matrix Theory, 2012
131 Ian M . M u sson , Lie Superalgebras and Enveloping Algebras, 2012
130 V iv ia n a E ne and J ü rgen H erzog , Gröbner Bases in Commutative Algebra, 2011
129 Stuart P. H astings and J. B r y c e M c L e o d , Classical Methods in Ordinary Differential
Equations, 2012
128 J. M . L an d sberg, Tensors: Geometry and Applications, 2012
IS BN 978 - 1 - 4704 -2 0 57 -4