Marketing Project 2023
Marketing Project 2023
POLICIES OF COMPANY
SUBMITTED TO
SUBMITTED BY
Sourabh Sanjeev Gaikwad
ROLL NO: 75
1
DECLARATION
2
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
3
ModernEducation Society’s
NESSWADIACOLLEGEOFCOMMERCE,PUNE
Certificate
This is to certify that Sourabh Sanjeev Gaikwad ,student of Third Year Bachelor
Business Administration Roll no. 75 having specialization in Marketing has
successfully completed his project titled “Case Study and Legal Aspects of
Pricing, Promotion Policies of Apple” as per the norms of Savitribai Phule Pune
University under the guidance of Ms. Arati Kothawade for the academic year
2023-2024.
Principal
4
INDEX
TOPIC
CASESTUDYONLEGALASPECTSOFPRICINGANDPROMOTIONPOLICIES OF.
1 PageNo.
5
ACTIVITY
CASESTUDYONLEGALASPECTSOFPRICINGANDPROMOTIONPOL
ICIES OF COCA-COLA COMPANY.
COMPANY NAME-
THE COCA-COLA COMPANY
(DRINK INDUSTRY COMPANY)
6
1.1 ABSTRACT
The Coca-Cola Company has a long history of innovation and marketing. The company was
one of the first to use mass advertising to promote its products. Coca-Cola has also been a
pioneer in the development of new products and packaging. The company has a strong
commitment to sustainability and social responsibility. Coca-Cola has been ranked as one of
the world's most valuable brands.
7
1.2MARKETING: AN INTRODUCTION
Marketing is the activity, set of institutions, and processes for creating, communicating,
delivering, and exchanging offerings that have value for customers, clients, partners, and
society at large. It is an essential business function that helps organizations achieve their
goals by connecting with customers and creating value for them.
Marketing plays a vital role in the success of any business. It helps businesses to:
The marketing mix is a set of tools that businesses use to achieve their marketing objectives.
The marketing mix consists of four elements:
Product: The product is the physical or intangible good or service that a business
offers for sale.
Price: The price is the amount that a customer is willing to pay for a product or
service.
Place: Place refers to the distribution channels that a business uses to get its products
or services to its customers.
Promotion: Promotion refers to the communication activities that a business uses to
inform, persuade, and remind its customers about its products or services.
8
Types Of Marketing
There are many different types of marketing, but some of the most common include:
Traditional marketing: This type of marketing uses traditional media channels such
as television, radio, print, and outdoor advertising to reach consumers.
Digital marketing: This type of marketing uses online channels such as
websites, social media, and email to reach consumers.
Direct marketing: This type of marketing uses direct communication channels such
as mail, telemarketing, and email to reach consumers.
Social media marketing: This type of marketing uses social media platforms to
connect with customers and build brand awareness.
Search engine optimization (SEO): This type of marketing helps businesses
improve the ranking of their websites in search engine results pages (SERPs).
Pay-per-click (PPC) advertising: This type of marketing involves paying to have
ads displayed on search engines and websites.
Influencer marketing: This type of marketing involves partnering with influencers to
promote your products or services.
Video marketing: This type of marketing uses videos to promote products or
services.
9
Content marketing: This type of marketing creates and shares valuable content to
attract and engage customers.
Cause Marketing: Aligning a brand with a social or environmental cause to build
goodwill and connect with socially conscious consumers.
Direct mail Marketing: Sending physical promotional materials, such as postcards
or catalogs, directly to a target audience.
The legal aspects of pricing and promotion policies in marketing involve ensuring
compliance with various laws and regulations to maintain ethical standards and fair
business practices. Here are key considerations:
1. Antitrust Laws: Pricing policies should avoid anticompetitive behavior such as price
fixing, bid rigging, or market allocation. These practices violate antitrust laws and
can lead to legal consequences.
2. Consumer Protection Laws: Ensure that pricing and promotional practices adhere
to consumer protection laws. Misleading advertising, false claims, or deceptive
pricing can lead to legal actions by regulatory authorities.
4. .Price Discrimination Laws: Be aware of and comply with laws related to price
discrimination. Discriminating in pricing based on factors such as race, gender, or
nationality is prohibited in many jurisdictions.
10
5. Privacy Laws: Marketing promotions should respect consumer privacy. Ensure
compliance with data protection laws when collecting and using customer
information for promotional purposes.
10. Intellectual Property Laws: Ensure that promotional materials do not infringe on
the intellectual property rights of others. This includes trademarks, copyrights, and
patents.
11
1.3 INTRODUCTION: Coca-Cola.
12
1.4 Importance of Pricing and Promotion Strategies in the Beverage
Industry.
Pricing and promotion strategies are crucial in the beverage industry, as they influence
consumer purchasing decisions and play a significant role in achieving business objectives.
Pricing strategies directly impact sales and revenue. By setting appropriate prices, beverage
companies can maximize their profits and market reach. For instance, premium pricing can
generate higher margins but may limit sales to a specific consumer segment. Conversely,
value pricing can attract a broader customer base but may lead to lower profit margins.
Promotion strategies help companies establish and strengthen their brand presence. Effective
promotions can enhance brand awareness, create positive brand associations, and foster
consumer loyalty. For example, Coca-Cola's iconic advertising campaigns have played a
pivotal role in shaping its global brand recognition and appeal.
Coca-Cola advertisement
13
3. Gaining Competitive Advantage
Strategic pricing and promotion tactics can differentiate a company's offerings from
competitors and establish a competitive edge in the market. For instance, exclusive
distribution deals or targeted promotional campaigns can give a company a temporary
advantage, while innovative product offerings or unique pricing schemes can provide a long-
term competitive edge.
Pricing and promotion strategies must be adaptable to respond to changing market conditions
and consumer preferences. Companies must monitor market trends, competitor actions, and
consumer behaviour to adjust their strategies accordingly. For example, seasonal promotions
or limited-edition product launches can capitalize on consumer demand during specific
periods.
5. Ethical Considerations
Pricing and promotion practices should adhere to ethical standards and consumer protection
regulations. Companies must avoid misleading or deceptive tactics, such as hidden fees or
false claims, to maintain consumer trust and avoid legal repercussions.
3. Red Bull's Extreme Sports Sponsorships: Red Bull's sponsorship of extreme sports
athletes and events has effectively aligned the brand with a sense of adventure and
adrenaline, appealing to a specific consumer segment.
14
1.5 Objectives of Legal Aspects of Pricing and Promotion Policies of Coca-
Cola.
Coca-Cola, as a multinational corporation, faces various legal aspects in its pricing and
promotion policies, both domestically and internationally. To navigate these complexities and
ensure compliance with relevant laws and regulations, Coca-Cola adheres to specific
objectives in its legal approach to pricing and promotion. These objectives encompass:
15
16
1.6 Role of Pricing and Promotion Policies in Coca-Cola Marketing
Strategies.
Pricing and promotion policies play a crucial role in Coca-Cola's marketing strategies. These
policies influence consumer behaviour, brand perception, and overall market share. Here's a
closer look at the role of pricing and promotion in Coca-Cola's marketing strategies:
Pricing Strategies:
Promotional Strategies:
17
1. Global Advertising Campaigns: Coca-Cola is renowned for its iconic and globally
recognized advertising campaigns that evoke feelings of happiness, nostalgia, and
shared experiences. These campaigns reinforce brand identity and emotional
connection with consumers.
2. Sponsorship and Partnerships: Coca-Cola actively sponsors major sporting events,
music festivals, and cultural initiatives to enhance brand visibility and align with
consumer interests.
3. Social Media Engagement: Coca-Cola maintains a strong social media presence,
interacting with consumers, creating engaging content, and leveraging influencer
marketing to reach a wider audience.
4. Digital Marketing: Coca-Cola utilizes digital marketing tactics, such as targeted
online advertising, search engine optimization, and email marketing, to reach specific
consumer segments and promote its products effectively.
5. Retail Partnerships: Coca-Cola collaborates closely with retailers to optimize
product placement, in-store promotions, and merchandising strategies to maximize
sales and visibility.
6. Promotional Events and Experiences: Coca-Cola organizes interactive events and
experiences, such as pop-up shops, sampling booths, and interactive installations, to
create memorable brand interactions and generate buzz.
7. Cause Marketing and Social Responsibility: Coca-Cola engages in cause marketing
initiatives, supporting social and environmental causes, to enhance brand reputation
and appeal to socially conscious consumers.
8. Limited-Edition Products and Flavors: Coca-Cola introduces limited-edition
products and flavour variations to create excitement, drive trial, and expand its
product portfolio.
9. Loyalty Programs and Rewards: Coca-Cola implements loyalty programs and
rewards initiatives to encourage repeat purchases, build customer loyalty, and collect
valuable consumer data.
18
1. Sales and Revenue Generation: Effective pricing and promotion strategies directly
impact Coca-Cola's sales and revenue generation. Competitive pricing attracts price-
sensitive consumers, while promotional activities boost short-term sales.
2. Brand Perception and Equity: Coca-Cola's pricing and promotion strategies
influence brand perception. Premium pricing suggests high quality and value, while
promotional activities can make the brand appear more affordable and accessible.
3. Market Share and Competitive Advantage: Coca-Cola's pricing and promotion
strategies contribute to maintaining market share and gaining a competitive
advantage. Competitive pricing keeps the brand in reach, while effective promotion
can differentiate it from competitors.
4. Consumer Behaviour and Purchasing Decisions: Pricing and promotion strategies
directly influence consumer behaviour and purchasing decisions. Price sensitivity,
brand loyalty, and promotional offers all play a role in consumer choices.
5. Profitability and Return on Investment: Coca-Cola's pricing and promotion
strategies are carefully crafted to maximize profitability and return on investment.
Balancing sales volume with profit margins is crucial for financial success.
Pricing and promotion policies are integral components of Coca-Cola's marketing strategies,
influencing consumer behaviour, shaping brand perception, and driving sales and
profitability. By carefully managing these policies, Coca-Cola maintains its position as a
global leader in the beverage industry.
19
Advertising regulations play a significant role in shaping Coca-Cola's marketing campaigns,
ensuring that its promotional activities comply with legal requirements and uphold ethical
standards. These regulations influence various aspects of Coca-Cola's marketing efforts,
including:
21
8. Regulatory Review and Enforcement: Coca-Cola's advertising campaigns may be
subject to review by regulatory bodies to ensure compliance with applicable laws and
regulations. The company must be prepared to address any concerns or potential
violations promptly.
9. Consumer Complaints and Investigations: Coca-Cola may face consumer
complaints or investigations regarding its advertising practices. The company must
have a process in place to address such concerns promptly and transparently.
10. Transparency and Accountability: Coca-Cola should strive for transparency and
accountability in its advertising practices. This includes providing clear and accessible
information about its advertising policies, responding to public concerns, and
engaging with stakeholders in discussions about ethical advertising.
22
Coca-Cola is a multinational corporation with a strong brand presence and a diverse product
portfolio. As such, it holds a significant number of intellectual property (IP) rights, including
trademarks, copyrights, and patents. These IP rights play a crucial role in Coca-Cola's pricing
and promotion strategies, influencing both domestic and international operations.
Pricing Implications
1. Brand Protection: Coca-Cola's trademarks, such as the iconic red logo and the
"Coca-Cola" script, are valuable assets that differentiate its products from competitors
and protect its brand reputation. By enforcing its trademark rights, Coca-Cola can
prevent unauthorized use of its branding and maintain control over its pricing
strategies.
2. Product Differentiation: Coca-Cola's patents for unique product formulations,
packaging designs, and manufacturing processes enable it to charge premium prices
for its products. These patents protect Coca-Cola's innovations and give it a
competitive advantage in the market.
3. Licensing Agreements: Coca-Cola licenses its IP rights to third parties, such as
bottlers and distributors, to expand its reach and generate additional revenue streams.
These licensing agreements often involve pricing agreements that ensure Coca-Cola
maintains control over its brand pricing and quality.
4. International Pricing: Coca-Cola's IP rights are protected by international treaties
and conventions, allowing it to enforce its pricing policies consistently across
different markets. This helps to maintain brand equity and prevent price arbitrage.
Promotional Implications
23
1. Protecting Advertising Campaigns: Coca-Cola's copyrights for its advertising
campaigns, including slogans, jingles, and creative concepts, protect its promotional
efforts from unauthorized copying or imitation. This ensures that Coca-Cola retains
control over its brand messaging and prevents competitors from free-riding on its
creative work.
2. Enforcing Fair Use: Coca-Cola must balance its IP rights with the principles of fair
use, which allow for limited use of copyrighted material without permission for
purposes such as criticism, commentary, or parody. This ensures that Coca-Cola's IP
does not stifle creativity or hinder public discourse.
24
3. Protecting Against Counterfeiting: Coca-Cola actively combats counterfeiting of its
products and packaging, which can damage its brand reputation and undermine its
pricing strategies. This involves working with law enforcement agencies, conducting
anti-counterfeiting campaigns, and implementing robust security measures.
4. Protecting Trade Secrets: Coca-Cola protects its trade secrets, such as product
recipes and manufacturing processes, to prevent unauthorized disclosure and maintain
its competitive advantage. This can influence pricing decisions by ensuring that Coca-
Cola maintains a unique market position.
Legal Considerations
1. IP Infringement Claims: Coca-Cola may face legal claims from competitors or other
parties alleging infringement of their IP rights. These claims can involve complex
legal issues and potentially significant financial damages.
2. Antitrust Regulations: Coca-Cola must be mindful of antitrust regulations when
using its IP rights to set prices or promote its products. Excessive use of IP rights to
monopolize the market or exclude competitors could lead to legal challenges.
3. International IP Agreements: Coca-Cola must adhere to international IP
agreements, such as the World Trade Organization's Agreement on Trade-Related
Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS), to enforce its rights in different
countries.
4. IP Licensing Disputes: Coca-Cola may encounter disputes with its licensees
regarding the terms and conditions of IP licensing agreements. These disputes can
involve complex legal issues and potentially significant financial implications.
5. IP Valuation: Coca-Cola must accurately value its IP assets to make informed
decisions about pricing, licensing, and potential acquisitions. This involves
considering both the financial and strategic value of its IP portfolio.
25
26
1.9 Landmark Legal Cases Shaping Pricing and Promotion Practices:
Impact on Coca-Cola and Legal Framework.
The legal landscape surrounding pricing and promotion practices has been significantly
influenced by a series of landmark legal cases. These cases have established fundamental
legal principles and boundaries that have had a profound impact on businesses, including
Coca-Cola. This analysis delves into the impact of these cases on Coca-Cola's pricing and
promotion strategies, highlighting the key legal principles and boundaries established through
these precedents.
Bates v. State Bar of Arizona (1977): This case established that it is not illegal for
businesses to advertise their professional services, including lawyers and doctors.
27
FTC v. Robinson-Patman Act (1936): This case established that it is illegal for
businesses to engage in price discrimination, which is charging different prices for the
same product to different customers.
Lanham Act (1946): This act protects trademarks, which are words, symbols, or
designs that identify and distinguish the source of goods or services.
FTC v. Kool Aid (1970): This case established that it is illegal for businesses to use
deceptive advertising, which is advertising that is false or misleading.
FTC v. Kellogg Company (1994): This case established that it is illegal for businesses
to make unsubstantiated claims in their advertising, which are claims that are not
supported by evidence.
FTC v. Herbalife International, Ltd. (2016): This case established that it is illegal for
businesses to use pyramid schemes, which are business models in which participants
are paid primarily for recruiting new participants rather than for selling products or
services.
These cases have established important legal principles and boundaries that have had a
significant impact on businesses, including Coca-Cola. For example, the FTC v. Cement
Manufacturers Association case has made it illegal for Coca-Cola to fix prices with its
competitors. This has forced Coca-Cola to compete on price, which has put downward
pressure on its profit margins.
28
The United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc. case has made it illegal for Coca-Cola to tie its
products together. This means that Coca-Cola cannot require retailers to purchase its products
in order to buy other products, such as Pepsi. This has made it more difficult for Coca-Cola to
control the distribution of its products.
The Bates v. State Bar of Arizona case has allowed Coca-Cola to advertise its products,
which has helped to increase brand awareness and sales. However, Coca-Cola must be
careful not to make false or misleading claims in its advertising, as this could lead to legal
action.
The FTC v. Robinson-Patman Act has made it illegal for Coca-Cola to discriminate in price
between different customers. This means that Coca-Cola cannot charge different prices for
the same product to different retailers, wholesalers, or consumers. This has made it more
difficult for Coca-Cola to tailor its pricing strategies to different customer segments.
The Lanham Act protects Coca-Cola's trademarks, which are valuable assets that help to
identify and distinguish its products. Coca-Cola must be vigilant in protecting its trademarks
from infringement, as this could damage its brand reputation and sales.
The FTC v. Kool Aid case has made it illegal for Coca-Cola to use deceptive advertising.
This means that Coca-Cola must ensure that its advertising is truthful and not misleading.
The FTC v. Kellogg Company case has made it illegal for Coca-Cola to make
unsubstantiated claims in its advertising. This means that Coca-Cola must support its claims
with evidence.
The FTC v. Herbalife International, Ltd. case has made it illegal for Coca-Cola to use
pyramid schemes. This means that Coca-Cola cannot pay participants primarily for recruiting
new participants rather than for selling products or services.
These cases have had a significant impact on the way that businesses, including Coca-Cola,
set prices and promote their products. By understanding these cases, businesses can avoid
legal problems and protect their reputations.
29
1.9 Coca-Cola's Internal processes and procedures for ensuring legal
compliance in pricing and promotion.
Before implementing any pricing or promotion strategies, Coca-Cola's marketing and pricing
teams submit their proposals to the legal department for thorough review and approval. This
process involves:
Identifying Legal Implications: Legal experts carefully assess the potential legal
implications of the proposed strategies, considering applicable laws, regulations, and
case precedents.
Evaluating Compliance: The legal team evaluates whether the proposed strategies
align with legal requirements and industry standards, ensuring compliance with
antitrust laws, advertising regulations, and consumer protection statutes.
Providing Guidance and Approvals: Legal experts provide comprehensive guidance
to marketing and pricing teams, advising on potential risks and suggesting
modifications to ensure legal compliance.
Documentation and Record-Keeping: Detailed documentation of the legal review
process is maintained, including the rationale behind approvals, modifications, or
rejections.
30
Coca-Cola recognizes the importance of legal awareness among its employees involved in
pricing and promotion activities. The company provides regular training and education
programs to enhance their understanding of legal boundaries and promote a culture of
compliance.
Coca-Cola proactively identifies and addresses potential legal challenges associated with
pricing and promotion strategies through a robust risk assessment and mitigation process.
Proactive Risk Identification: Legal teams work closely with marketing and pricing
teams to identify potential legal risks upfront, considering market trends, regulatory
changes, and competitor actions.
Likelihood and Impact Assessment: The likelihood and potential impact of
identified risks are evaluated to prioritize mitigation efforts and allocate resources
effectively.
Developing Mitigation Plans: For each identified risk, mitigation plans are
developed, suggesting alternative approaches or modifications to minimize the
likelihood of legal violations.
Continuous Monitoring and Review: Risk assessments and mitigation plans are
regularly reviewed and updated to reflect changes in the legal landscape and market
dynamics.
Coca-Cola conducts regular internal audits and reviews of its pricing and promotion practices
to ensure ongoing compliance and identify any potential areas for improvement.
31
documentation, interviewing employees, and assessing adherence to legal
requirements.
Compliance Assessments: Auditors assess whether actual practices align with
approved strategies and legal requirements, identifying any deviations or potential
violations.
Recommendations and Corrective Actions: Auditors provide detailed
recommendations for corrective actions and improvements to strengthen legal
compliance and mitigate risks.
Management Review and Implementation: Audit findings are reviewed by senior
management, and action plans are implemented to address identified issues and
prevent future violations.
Coca-Cola has established a clear and accessible reporting and escalation mechanism for
employees to raise concerns about potential legal violations related to pricing and promotion.
Coca-Cola maintains a strong relationship with external legal counsel to provide expert
advice and guidance on complex legal matters related to pricing and promotion.
32
33
1.10 Case study of Coca-Cola
Issue: The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) alleged that Coca-Cola engaged in unfair trade
practices by granting exclusive territorial distribution rights to bottlers, which limited
competition and prevented new entrants from entering the market.
Outcome: The FTC found Coca-Cola guilty of violating Section 2 of the Sherman Antitrust
Act and ordered the company to modify its exclusive territorial distribution agreements.
Implications: This case established that exclusive territorial distribution agreements can be
considered anticompetitive if they significantly harm competition in the market. The ruling
forced Coca-Cola to adopt a more open distribution system, which increased competition and
benefited consumers.
Issue: The Lanham Act protects trademarks from unauthorized use or imitation. Several
companies sued Coca-Cola for trademark infringement, alleging that the company's use of
certain marks, such as "Spider-Cola" and "Coca-Cola Classic," infringed on their trademarks.
Outcome: Coca-Cola settled several of these cases out of court, agreeing to modify or
discontinue the use of certain marks. In other cases, the company prevailed in court,
successfully defending its trademark rights.
Implications: These cases highlight the importance of carefully selecting and protecting
trademarks to avoid legal challenges and maintain brand integrity. Coca-Cola's willingness to
settle or modify its use of certain marks demonstrated its commitment to resolving trademark
disputes and protecting its brand reputation.
34
Case 3: FTC v. Coca-Cola Company (2000)
Issue: The FTC alleged that Coca-Cola engaged in deceptive marketing practices by making
misleading claims about the health benefits of its Minute Maid orange juice products.
Specifically, the FTC claimed that Coca-Cola's advertising suggested that the juice could
boost the immune system and prevent colds, when there was no scientific evidence to support
these claims.
Outcome: Coca-Cola settled the case with the FTC without admitting any wrongdoing. The
company agreed to modify its advertising to avoid making unsubstantiated claims about the
health benefits of its products.
Issue: Coca-Cola sued Dr Pepper/Seven Up, Inc., alleging that the company's advertising
campaign for its "Fiest Fiesta" flavoured Dr Pepper beverage infringed on Coca-Cola's
trademark for its Fanta brand.
Outcome: The court ruled in favour of Coca-Cola, finding that Dr Pepper's advertising
campaign was likely to cause confusion among consumers and dilute the distinctiveness of
Coca-Cola's Fanta trademark.
Implications: This case reaffirmed the importance of protecting trademarks and preventing
misleading advertising that can confuse consumers. Coca-Cola's successful defense of its
Fanta trademark demonstrated the strength of its brand equity and its willingness to take legal
action to protect its intellectual property rights.
35
Case 5: FTC v. Coca-Cola Company (2013)
Issue: The FTC alleged that Coca-Cola engaged in unfair trade practices by using its
dominance in the soft drink market to pressure retailers to grant it preferential shelf space and
promotional deals.
Outcome: Coca-Cola settled the case with the FTC without admitting any wrongdoing. The
company agreed to modify its practices and provide retailers with greater flexibility in
choosing their product assortment and promotional activities.
Implications: This case highlighted the potential antitrust concerns associated with market
dominance. Coca-Cola's willingness to settle the case and modify its practices demonstrated
its commitment to fair competition and maintaining a positive relationship with retailers.
These cases provide valuable insights into the legal challenges and considerations that Coca-
Cola faces in its pricing and promotion strategies. This hypothetical case involving Coca-
Cola's promotion strategy emphasizes the delicate balance that companies must maintain
between competitive marketing and adherence to legal and ethical standards. It underscores
the importance of transparent communication, fair competition, and compliance with
regulations in the design and execution of promotional campaigns. The legal outcomes and
associated implications serve as a reminder to businesses that even well-intentioned
promotions can have unintended consequences if they run afoul of antitrust or consumer
protection laws. This case study highlights the necessity for companies to stay vigilant in
navigating the complex landscape of competition and consumer protection regulations to
maintain both market share and reputation. The company's proactive approach to legal
compliance and its willingness to modify practices when necessary have helped to protect its
brand reputation and ensure its continued success in the global beverage industry.
36
1.11 SWOT Analysis
Strengths
Strong brand reputation and brand equity: Coca-Cola is one of the most recognizable
brands in the world, with a strong reputation for quality and taste. This gives the
company significant pricing power and allows it to command premium prices for its
products.
Global reach and presence: Coca-Cola operates in over 200 countries, making it one
of the most globally distributed brands in the world. This global reach gives the
company the ability to leverage economies of scale and negotiate favourable pricing
with suppliers and distributors.
Sophisticated pricing and promotion strategies: Coca-Cola has a long history of
developing innovative and effective pricing and promotion strategies. The company
uses a variety of pricing techniques, such as value-based pricing, skimming pricing,
and penetration pricing, to maximize its profits and reach different customer
segments.
Strong compliance with legal and regulatory requirements: Coca-Cola has a dedicated
legal team that works to ensure that the company's pricing and promotion strategies
comply with all applicable laws and regulations. This helps to protect the company
from legal challenges and maintain its reputation for ethical business practices.
Weaknesses
37
History of legal challenges: Coca-Cola has a history of legal challenges related to its
pricing and promotion practices. These challenges have resulted in fines and
settlements, and they have also damaged the company's reputation.
Vulnerability to changing consumer preferences: Consumer preferences are constantly
evolving, and Coca-Cola must be careful to adapt its pricing and promotion strategies
to keep up with these trends. Failure to do so could lead to lost sales and market share.
Potential for antitrust scrutiny: Coca-Cola is a dominant player in the global beverage
market, and this makes it a target for antitrust scrutiny. The company must be careful
to avoid engaging in anticompetitive practices, such as price fixing or exclusive
dealing arrangements.
Opportunities
Threats
1.12Conclusion
38
Coca-Cola is a global leader in the beverage industry with a strong brand reputation
and a sophisticated understanding of pricing and promotion strategies. However, the
company faces a number of legal challenges and threats that could impact its future
success. Coca-Cola must continue to adapt its pricing and promotion strategies to
changing consumer preferences and market conditions, while also ensuring that its
practices comply with all applicable laws and regulations. The legal framework
surrounding pricing and promotion practices is complex and constantly evolving.
Businesses must stay abreast of the latest legal developments to ensure compliance
and avoid potential legal challenges. Coca-Cola has been significantly impacted by
landmark legal cases that have shaped its pricing and promotion strategies. The
company must remain vigilant in its compliance with the law to protect its brand
reputation and sales. The evolving legal landscape poses both challenges and
opportunities for businesses. By understanding the legal principles established through
landmark cases, businesses can develop effective pricing and promotion strategies that
comply with the law, protect consumer interests, and foster fair competition.
1.13Bibliography/Webliography
39
http://www.investopedia.com/terms/m/marketing
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business
https://businessmodelanalyst.com/coca-cola-swot-analysis/
https://www.simplilearn.com/tutorials/marketing-case-studies-tutorial/coca-
cola-marketing-strategy
https://casetext.com/admin-law/royal-crown-company-inc-and-dr-pepperseven-
up-inc-v-the-coca-cola-company-the-coca-cola-company-v-royal-crown-
company-inc-and-dr-pepperseven-up-inc-6
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_patent_law
40