CSC Original Print
CSC Original Print
previously published
as Miscellaneous
No. 21 (1973),
Cmnd. 5376
I'
[The United Kingdom instrument of ratification was deposited on 8 March 1978 and the
Convention entered into force for the United Kingdom on 8 March 1979]
Presented to Parliament
by the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs
by Command of Her Majesty
May 1979
LONDON
HER MAJESTY'S STATIONERY OFFICE
60p net
Cmnd. 7535
INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION FOR SAFE CONTAINERS (CSC)(11
PREAMBLE
ARTICLE I
ARTICLE 11
Definitions
For the purpose of the present Convention, unless expressly provided
otherwise :
1. " Container " means an article of transport equipment:
(a) of a permanent character and accordingly strong enough to be
suitable for repeated use;
(b) specially designed to facilitate the transport of goods, by one or
more modes of transport, without intermediate reloading;
(c) designed to be secured and/or readily handled, having corner fittings
for these purposes;
(d) of a size such that the area enclosed by the four outer bottom corners
is either:
(i) at least 14 sq. m. (150 sq. ft.) or
(ii) at least 7 sq. m. (75 sq. ft.) if it is fitted with top comer fittings;
(1) The English text as published in Miscellaneous No. 21 (1973) Cmnd. 5376 was
modified, after consultation with the Governments concerned, by a Prates-Verbal of
Rectification issued by the Secretary -General of IMCO on I September 1976. These
modifications are incorporated in this text.
3
11263 B•
the term "container" includes neither vehicles nor packaging; however,
containers when carried on chassis are included.
7. " Cargo " means any goods , wares , merchandise and articles of every
kind whatsoever carried in the containers.
8. " New container " means a container the construction of which was
commenced on or after the date of entry into force of the present Convention.
9. " Existing container " means a container which is not a new container.
10. " Owner " means the owner as provided for under the national law
of the Contracting Party or the lessee or bailee, if an agreement between the
parties provides for the exercise of the owner's responsibility for maintenance
and examination of the container by such lessee or bailee.
11. " Type of container " means the design type approved by the
Administration.
16. " Maximum Permissible Payload " or " P " means the difference
between maximum operating gross weight or rating and tare weight.
4
ARTICLE III
Application
1. The present Convention applies to new and existing containers used
in international transport, excluding containers specially designed for air
transport.
ARTICLE IV
ARTICLE V
Acceptance of Approval
1. Approval under the authority of a Contracting Party, granted under
the terms of the present Convention, shall be accepted by the other
1
Contracting Parties for all purposes covered by the present Convention.
It shall be regarded by the other Contracting Parties as having the same
force as an approval issued by them.
5
2. A Contracting Party shall not impose any other structural safety
requirements or tests on containers covered by the present Convention,
provided however that nothing in the present Convention shall preclude the
application of provisions of national regulations or legislation or of inter-
national agreements, prescribing additional structural safety requirements or
tests for containers specially designed for the transport of dangerous goods,
or for those features unique to containers carrying bulk liquids or for
containers when carried by air. The term " dangerous goods " shall have that
meaning assigned to it by international agreements.
ARTICLE VI
Control
1. Every container which has been approved under article III shall be
subject to control in the territory of the Contracting Parties by officers duly
authorized by such Contracting Parties. This control shall be limited to
verifying that the container carries a valid Safety Approval Plate as required
by the present Convention, unless there is significant evidence for believing
that the condition of the container is such as to create an obvious risk to
safety. In that case the officer carrying out the control shall only exercise
it in so far as it may be necessary to ensure that the container is restored
to a safe condition before it continues in service.
2. Where the container appears to have become unsafe as a result of a
defect which may have existed when the container was approved, the
Administration responsible for that approval shall be informed by the
Contracting Party which detected the defect.
ARTICLE VII
ARTICLE VIII
ARTICLE IX
ARTICLE X
Denunciation
1. Any Contracting Party may denounce the present Convention by
effecting the deposit of an instrument with the Secretary-General. The
denunciation shall take effect one year from the date of such deposit with
the Secretary-General.
2. A Contracting Party which has communicated an objection to an
amendment to the Annexes may denounce the present Convention and such
denunciation shall take effect on the date of entry into force of such an
amendment.
ARTICLE XII
Termination
The present Convention shall cease to be in force if the number of
Contracting Parties is less than five for any period of twelve consecutive
months.
ARTICLE XIII
Settlement of disputes
1. Any dispute between two or more Contracting Parties concerning
the interpretation or application of the present Convention which cannot
be settled by negotiation or other means of settlement shall, at the request
of one of them, be referred to an arbitration tribunal composed as follows:
each party to the dispute shall appoint an arbitrator and these two arbitrators
shall appoint a third arbitrator, who shall be the Chairman. If, three
months after receipt of a request, one of the parties has failed to appoint
an arbitrator or if the arbitrators have failed to elect the Chairman, any
of the parties may request the Secretary-General to appoint an arbitrator or
the Chairman of the arbitration tribunal.
2. The decision of the arbitration tribunal established under the
provisions of paragraph l shall be binding on the parties to the dispute.
5. Any controversy which may arise between the parties to the dispute
as regards the interpretation and execution of the award may be submitted
by any of the parties for judgment to the arbitration tribunal which made
the award.
9
11263 02
ARTICLE XIV
Reservations
1. Reservations to the present Convention shall be permitted, excepting
those relating to the provisions of articles I-VI, XIII, the present article
and the Annexes, on condition that such reservations are communicated in
writing and, if communicated before the deposit of the instrument of
ratification, acceptance, approval or accession, are confirmed in that instru-
ment. The Secretary-General shall communicate such reservations to all
States referred to in article VII.
ARTICLE XV
Notification
In addition to the notifications and communications provided for in
articles IX, X and XIV, the Secretary-General shall notify all the States
referred to in article VII of the following:
(a) signatures, ratifications, acceptances, approvals and accessions under
article VII;
(b) the date of entry into force of the present Convention in accordance
with article VIII;
(c) the date of entry into force of amendments to the present Convention
in accordance with articles IX and X;
(d) denunciations under article XI;
(e) the termination of the present Convention under article XII.
ARTICLE XVI
Authentic texts
The original of the present Convention, of which the Chinese, English,
French, Russian and Spanish texts are equally authentic, shall be deposited
with the Secretary-General, who shall communicate certified true copies to
all States referred to in article VII.
10
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the undersigned Plenipotentiaries , being duly
authorized thereto by their respective Governments, have signed the present
I Convention.
11
ANNex I
Regulation 1
Safety Approval Plate
1. A Safety Approval Plate conforming to the specifications set out
in the Appendix to this Annex shall be permanently affixed to every
approved container at a readily visible place, adjacent to any other approval
plate issued for official purposes, where it would not be easily damaged.
2. (a) The plate shall contain the following information in at least the
English or French language:
" CSC SAFETY APPROVAL"
Country of approval and approval reference
Date (month and year) of manufacture
Manufacturer's identification number of the container or, in the case of
existing containers for which that number is unknown, the number
allocated by the Administration
Maximum operating gross weight (kilogrammes and lbs)
Allowable stacking weight for 1-8g (kilogrammes and Ibs)
Transverse racking test load value (kilogrammes and Ibs).
(b) A blank space should be reserved on the Plate for insertion of end-
wall and/or side-wall strength values (factors) in accordance with paragraph
3 of this Regulation and Annex IT, tests 6 and 7. A blank space should also
be reserved on the Plate for the first and subsequent maintenance examination
dates (month and year) when used.
3. Where the Administration considers that a new container satisfies
the requirements of the present Convention in respect of safety and if, for
such container, the end-wall and/or side-wall strength values (factor) are
designed to be greater or less than those stipulated in Annex II, such values
shall be indicated on the Safety Approval Plate.
4. The presence of the Safety Approval Plate does not remove the
necessity of displaying such labels or other information as may be required
by other regulations which may be in force.
Regulation 2
Maintenance
1. The owner of the container shall be responsible for maintaining it in
safe condition.
12
2. The owner of an approved container shall examine the container or
have it examined in accordance with the procedure either prescribed or
approved by the Contracting Party concerned, at intervals appropriate to
operating conditions. The date (month and year) before which a new
container shall undergo its first examination shall be marked on the Safety
Approval Plate.
3. The date (month and year) before which the container shall be
re-examined shall be clearly marked on the container on or as close as
practicable to the Safety Approval Plate and in a manner acceptable. to that
Contracting Party which. prescribed or approved the particular maintenance
procedure involved.
4. The interval from the date of manufacture to the date of the first
examination shall not exceed five years. Subsequent examination of new
containers and re-examination of existing containers shall be at intervals
of not more than 24 months. All examinations shall determine whether the
container has any defects which could place any person in danger.
5. For the purpose of this Regulation " the Contracting Party concerned "
is the Contracting Party of the territory in which the owner is domiciled or
has his head office.
Regulation 3
Approval of New Containers
To qualify for approval for safety purposes under the present Convention
all new containers shall comply with the requirements set out in Annex II.
Regulation 4
Regulation S
Provisions for Approval by Design Type
1. Where the containers are to be manufactured by design type series,
application made to an Administration for approval by design type shall be
accompanied by drawings, a design specification of the type of container to
be approved and such other data as may be required by the Administration.
13
2. The applicant shall state the identification symbols which will be
assigned by the manufacturer to the type of container to which the application
for approval relates.
Regulation 6
In order to ensure that containers of the same design type series are
manufactured to the approved design, the Administration shall examine or
test as many units as it considers necessary, at any stage during production
of the design type series concerned.
Regulation 7
Notification of Administration
Regulation 8
Approval of Individual Containers
Approval of individual containers may be granted where the Administra-
tion, after examination and witnessing of tests, is satisfied that the container
meets the requirements of the present Convention; the Administration, when
so satisfied, shall notify the applicant in writing of approval and this
notification shall entitle him to affix the Safety Approval Plate to such
container.
Regulation 9
16
APPENDIX
> 200 mm
18
TEST LOADINGS AND APPLIED TEST PROCEDURES
ti FORCES
19
TEST LOADINGS AND APPLIED TEST PROCEDURES
FORCES
2. STACKING
1. For conditions of international transport where the maximum vertical acceleration
forces vary significantly from 1.8 g and when the container is reliably and effectively
limited to such conditions of transport, the stacking load may be varied by the
appropriate ratio of acceleration forces.
2. On successful completion of this test the container may be rated for the allowable
superimposed static stacking weight which should be indicated on the Safety Approval
Plate, against the heading " Allowable stacking weight for 1.8 g (kilogrammes and
lbs) ".
Internal loading:
A uniformly distributed load such that the The container, having the prescribed
combined weight of container and test INTERNAL LOADING, shall be placed
load is equal to 1.8 R. on four level pads which are in turn
supported on a rigid horizontal surface,
one under each bottom corner fitting or
equivalent corner structure. The pads
shall be centralized under the fittings and
shall be of approximately the same plan
dimensions as the fittings.
Externally applied forces:
Such as to subject each of the four top Each EXTERNALLY APPLIED
corner fittings to a vertical downward force FORCE shall be applied to each of the
equal to 3 x 1.8 x the allowable super- corner fittings through a corresponding
imposed static stacking weight. test corner fitting or through a pad of the
same plan dimensions. The test corner
fitting or pad shall be offset with respect
to the top corner fitting of the container
by 25 mm (1 in.) laterally and 38 mm
(11 in.) longitudinally.
4. TRANSVERSE RACKING
Internal loading:
None. The container in tare condition shall be
placed on four level supports one under
each bottom corner and shall be restrained
against lateral and vertical movement by
means of anchor devices so arranged that
the lateral restraint is provided only at
the bottom corners diagonally opposite to
those at which the forces are applied.
Externally applied forces:
Such as to rack the end structures of the The EXTERNALLY APPLIED
container sideways. The forces shall be FORCES shall be applied either separ-
equal to those for which the container was ately or simultaneously to each of the top
designed. corner fittings on one side of the container
-1 in lines parallel both to the base and to
the planes of the ends of the container.
The forces shall be applied first towards
and then away from the top corner
fittings. In the case of containers in
which each end is symmetrical about its
own vertical centreline, one side only need
be tested, but both sides of containers
with asymmetric ends shall be tested.
21
TEST LOADINGS AND APPLIED TEST PROCEDURES
FORCES
6. END-WALLS'
The end-walls should be capable of withstanding a load of not less than 0 . 4 times the
maximum permissible payload . If, however , the end- walls are designed to withstand
a load of less or greater than 0 . 4 times the maximum permissible payload such a
strength factor shall be indicated on the Safety Approval Plate in accordance with
Annex I, Regulation 1.
Internal loading:
Such as to subject the inside of an end-wall The prescribed INTERNAL LOADING
to a uniformly distributed load of 0,4P or shall be applied as follows:
such other load forwhich'the container Both ends of a container shall be tested
may be designed. except where the ends are identical only
one end need be tested. The end-walls
of containers which do not have open
sides or side doors may be tested
'separetely or simultaneously.
The end-walls of containers which do
have open sides or side doors should be
tested separately. When the ends are
tested separately the reactions to the
forces applied to the end-wall shall be
Externally applied forces: confined to the base structure of the
None. container.
7. SIDE-WALLS
The side-walls should be capable of withstanding a load of not less than 0 . 6 times the
maximum permissible payload . If, however , the side -walls are designed to withstand
a load of less or greater than 0 . 6 times the maximum permissible payload, such a
strength factor shall be indicated on the Safety Approval Plate in accordance with
Annex I, Regulation 1.
Internal loading:
Such as to subject the inside of a side-wall The prescribed INTERNAL LOADING
to a uniformly distributed load of 0.6P or shall be applied as follows:
such other load for which the container Both sides of a container shall be tested
may be designed. except where the sides are identical only
one side need be tested . Side-walls
shall be tested separately and the
reactions to the internal loading shall be
confined to the corner fittings or
equivalent corner structures. Open
topped containers shall be tested in the
condition in which they are designed to
Externally applied forces: be operated , for example , with remov-
None. able top members in position.
22
SIGNATURES, RATIFICATIONS AND APPROVALS
Date of deposit
State Date of signature of ratification/
approval(A)
Austria ... ... 16 May, 1973
Bulgaria ... ... ... .. 12 Jan. 1973 17 Nov. 1976:
Byelorussia ... ... 9 Nov. 1973: 6 Sept. 1976:
Canada ... ... ... 5 Dec. 1972*
Czechoslovakia ... ... 28 Dec. 1973$ 8 May 1974: (A)
Finland ... ... ... 20 Dec' 1973
France ... ... 13 Dec. 1973:* 21 Oct. 1974: (A)
Germany, Federal Republic of 5 Dec. 1972* 27 July 1976t.
ti
Hungary... 10 Jan. 1973 9 Jan. 1974
Korea, Republic of ... 11 Jan. 1973* 18 Dec. 1978
Poland ... ... ... 20 Dec. 1972
Romania ... ... 19 Dec. 1973:* 26 Nov. 1975:
Soviet Union ... ... 23 Aug. 1973: 24 Aug. 1976:
Switzerland ... . 8 Dec. 1972
Turkey ... 15 Dec. 1972:
Ukraine ... ... ... 9 Nov. 1973: 6 Sept. 1976:
United Kingdom ... 13 Feb. 1973 8 Mar. 1978: i
United States ... ... 5 Dec. 1972* 3 Jan. 1978
Yugoslavia ... ... 20 Mar. 1973*
ACCESSIONS
Date of deposit
Germany, Democratic Republic of 27 Sept. 1974:
India ... ... ... ... 27 Jan. 1978
Japan ... ... ... ... 12 June 1978
Liberia ... ... ... ... 14 Feb. 1978
New Zealand ... ... ... 23 Dec. 1974:
Saudi Arabia ... ... ... 6 Oct. 1978
Spain ... ... ... ... 13 May 1974
23
Declarations and Reservations
BULGARIA
On depositing their instrument of ratification the Government of the People's
Republic of Bulgaria made the following declarations:
(Translation) "The People's Republic of Bulgaria considers that Article 7,
which restricts the participation of a number of States in the Convention, is
contrary to the generally accepted principle of the sovereign equality of States. r
The People's Republic of Bulgaria considers that the acceptance on its part
of Article 13 is not to be understood as a change in its position and that a
given dispute may be referred to an arbitral tribunal only with the consent. of all
the parties to the particular dispute."
BYELORUSSIA
On signing the Agreement the Government of the Byelorussion Soviet Socialist
Republic made the following reservations:
(Translation) " It is the view of the Government of the Byelorussian Soviet e
Socialist Republic that the Provisions of Article VII of the International
Convention for Safe Containers restricting participation of some States in the
Convention contradict the generally recognised principle of the sovereign equality
of States.
" As to the provisions of Article XIII concerning the settlement of disputes on
the interpretation and application of the present Convention through arbitration
the Government of the BSSR puts it on record that the acceptance of these
provisions must not be interpreted as modifying the view of the BSSR Government
that a dispute can be referred to an arbitration tribunal only with the
agreement of all parties to a dispute in each particular case".
The instrument of ratification deposited by the Government of the Byelorussian
SSR contained similar reservations.
CZECHOSLOVAKIA
On signing the Convention the Government of the, Czechoslovak Socialist
Republic declared:
(Translation) "The Government of the Czechoslovak Socialist Republic
considers that the provisions of Article VII of the International Convention for
Safe Containers, done at Geneva on 2 December 1972, which bar certain States
from participation in it, are contrary to the universally recognised principle of
the sovereign equality of States."
On depositing their instrument of approval the Government of the
Czechoslovak Socialist Republic made a declaration in similar terms.
FRANCE
On signing the Convention the Government of the French Republic made the r
following declaration:
Le Gouvernement francais, conformdment aux dispositions de ('article XIV,
dmet one reserve a 1'encontre do 4eme paragraphe de Particle X rddige comme
suit: "une objection elevde contre cet amendement par one partie contractante
n'aura pas force obligatoire a l'dgard des autres parties contractantes pour cc qui
cst do 1'agr6ment des conteneurs auxquels la prdsente Convention s'applique ".
Lorsqu'une objection aura ete dlevee contre on amendement par. une partie
contractante, les dispositions de cet amendement ne Jui seront pas opposables.
Translation
"The French Government, in accordance with the provisions of Article XIV,
enters a reservation against (that part of) the fourth paragraph of Article X which
reads as follows: "an objection made by a Contracting Party shall not be binding
on other Contracting Parties as to acceptance of containers to which the present
Convention applies."
When an objection to an amendment is raised by a Contracting Party, the
provisions of that amendment shall not be invoked against the said Party."
A similar declaration by the Government of the French Republic was made on
depositing their instrument of approval.
24
GERMAN DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC
On depositing its instrument of accession the Government of the German
Democratic Republic made the following statements:
"The German Democratic Republic considers it necessary to point out that
Article Vii deprives some States of the possibility to become parties to this
Convention."
"The Convention regulates questions affecting the interests of all States ; there-
fore it must be open for all States which are guided in their policies by the principles
and purposes of the United Nations Charter to become parties to it.
With regard to the provisions of Article XIII of the Convention dealing with
the settlement of disputes concerning the interpretation or application of the Con-
vention by arbitration the German Democratic Republic declares that the acceptance
of this provision should not be interpreted in such a way as if the view of the
German Democratic Republic changed that a dispute may only be referred to an
arbitration tribunal for consideration with the consent of all parties to the dispute."
NEW ZEALAND
The instrument of accession deposited by the Government of New Zealand contained
the following paragraph:
"and the Government of New Zealand declares that its accession to the
Convention shall not extend to the Cook Islands, Niue and the Tokelau Islands".
ROMANIA
M
On signing the Convention the Government of Romania made the following
declaration:
(Translation) "The Government of the Socialist Republic of Romania considers
that the provisions of Article VII of the International Convention for Safe Con-
tainers, done at Geneva on 2 December 1972, are not consistent with the principle
that multilateral international treaties, whose aim and object affect the international
community as a whole, should be open to universal participation."
The instrument of ratification deposited by the Government of Romania was
accompanied by a similar statement.
SOVIET UNION
On signing the Convention the Government of the Soviet Union made the following
reservations:
"it is the view of the Government of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics
that the provisions of Article VII of the International Convention for Safe Con-
tainers restricting participation of some states in the Convention contradict the
generally recognised principle of the sovereign equality of states.
As to the provisions of Article XIII concerning the settlement of disputes on
r
the interpretation and applicationabf the present Convention through arbitration the
USSR Government puts it on record that the acceptance of these provisions must
not be interpreted as modifying the view of the USSR Government that a dispute
can be referred to an arbitration tribunal only with the agreement of all parties to
a dispute in each particular case".
The instrument of ratification deposited by the Government of the USSR contained
similar reservations.
TURKEY
On signing the Convention the Government of Turkey made the following
reservation:
Avec one reservation sur la partie ci-dessous reproduite du 48me paragraphe de
l'article X: "une objection elevee contre cet amendement par one Partie con-
tractante n 'aura pas force obligatoire a 1'egard des autres Parties Contractantes pour
cc qui est de l'agrement des conteneurs auxquels la presente Convention
s'applique."
25
Translation :
" With a reservation concerning that part of the fourth paragraph of Article X
which reads: "an objection made by a Contracting Party shall not be binding on
other Contracting Parties as to acceptance of containers to which the present
Convention applies."
UKRAINE
On signing the Convention the Government of the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist
Republic made the following reservations:
"It is the view of the Government of the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic
that the provisions of Article VII of the International Convention for Safe
Containers restricting participation of some states in the Convention contradict the
generally recognised principle of the sovereign equality of states.
As to the provisions of Article XIII concerning the settlement of disputes on
the interpretation and application of the present Convention through arbitration
the Ukrainian SSR Government puts it on record that the acceptance of these
provisions must not be interpreted as modifying the view of the Ukrainian SSR
Government that a dispute can be referred to an arbitration tribunal only with r
the agreement of all parties to a dispute "in each particular case ".
The instrument of ratification deposited by the Government of the Ukrainian SSR
contained similar reservations.
UNITED KINGDOM
In the instrument of ratification deposited by the Government of the United
Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland that Government stated that it
reserved : N
11 the right not to apply the said Convention in respect of any territory
for -whose international relations the Government of the United Kingdom is
responsible until twelve months after the date on which the Government of the
United Kingdom notify the Secretary-General of the Inter-Governmental Maritime
Consultative Organization that the said Convention shall apply in respect of any
such territory."
or