Corporate Strategy
Corporate Strategy
ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE
CENTRALIZED ORGANIZATION
- In a centralized organizational system, there are very clear
responsibilities for each role, with subordinate roles defaulting to the
guidance of their superiors.
- organizations have been structured with centralized leadership and a
defined chain of command.
- The military is an organization famous for its highly centralized
structure, with a long and specific hierarchy of superiors and
subordinates.
DECENTRALIZED ORGANIZATION
1.FUNCTIONAL STRUCTURE
- first and most common structure
- also referred to as a bureaucratic organizational structure and
breaks up a company based on the specialization of its
workforce.
- small-to-medium-sized businesses implement a functional
structure.
- a functional org structure starts with positions with the
highest levels of responsibility at the top and goes down from
there.
PROS:
Allows employees to focus on their role
Encourages specialization
Help teams and departments feel self-determined
Is easily scalable in any sized company
CONS:
Can create silos within an organization
Hampers interdepartmental communication
Obscures processes and strategies for different markets or
products in a company
PRODUCT BASED
- Divisions are separated by product line. For example, a
tech company might have a division dedicated to its cloud
offerings, while the rest of the divisions focus on the
different software offerings—e.g., Adobe and its creative
suite of Illustrator, Photoshop, InDesign, etc.
GEOGRAPHIC
- Divisions are separated by region, territories, or districts,
offering more effective localization and logistics.
Companies might establish satellite offices across the
country or the globe in order to stay close to their
customers.
PROS:
Helps large companies stay flexible
Allows for a quicker response to industry changes or customer
needs
Promotes independence, autonomy, and a customized approach
CONS:
Can easily lead to duplicate resources
Can mean muddled or insufficient communication between the
headquarters and its divisions
Can result in a company competing with itself
3.TEAM BASED
- Similar to divisional or functional structures, team-based
organizations segregate into close-knit teams of employees that
serve particular goals and functions, but where each team is a
unit that contains both leaders and workers.
- A team organizational structure is meant to disrupt the
traditional hierarchy, focusing more on problem-solving,
cooperation, and giving employees more control.
PROS:
Increases productivity, performance, and transparency by
breaking down silo mentality
Promotes a growth mindset
Changes the traditional career models by getting people to move
laterally
Values experience rather than seniority
Requires minimal management
Fits well with agile companies with Scrum or tiger teams
CONS:
Goes against many companies’ natural inclination of a purely
hierarchical structure
Might make promotional paths less clear for employees
4.FLAT STRUCTURE
- also known as a horizontal structure, is relatively newer, and is
used among many startups.
- As the name alludes, it flattens the hierarchy and chain of
command and gives its employees a lot of autonomy.
- Companies that use this type of structure have a high speed of
implementation.
- A horizontal or flat organizational structure fits companies
with few levels between upper management and staff-level
employees.
- Many start-up businesses use a horizontal org structure
before they grow large enough to build out different
departments, but some organizations maintain this structure
since it encourages less supervision and more involvement
from all employees.
PROS:
Gives employees more responsibility
Fosters more open communication
Improves coordination and speed of implementing new ideas
CONS:
Can create confusion since employees do not have a clear
supervisor to report to
Can produce employees with more generalized skills and
knowledge
Can be difficult to maintain once the company grows beyond
start-up status
5.MATRIX STRUCTURE
- the most confusing and the least used.
- This structure matrixes employees across different superiors,
divisions, or departments.
- An employee working for a matrixed company, for example,
may have duties in both sales and customer service.
- looks like a grid, and it shows cross-functional teams that
form for special projects. For example, an engineer may
regularly belong to the engineering department (led by an
engineering director) but work on a temporary project (led by a
project manager).
- accounts for both of these roles and reporting relationships.
PROS:
Allows supervisors to easily choose individuals by the needs of a
project
Gives a more dynamic view of the organization
Encourages employees to use their skills in various capacities
aside from their original roles
CONS:
Presents a conflict between department managers and project
managers
Can change more frequently than other organizational chart
types
6.CIRCULAR STRUCTURE
- are hierarchical, but they are said to be circular as it places
higher-level employees and managers at the center of the
organization with concentric rings expanding outward, which
contain lower-level employees and staff.
- intended to encourage open communication and collaboration
among the different ranks.
- The pyramid-shaped organizational chart we referred to
earlier is known as a hierarchical org chart. It’s the most
common type of organizational structure—the chain of
command goes from the top (e.g., the CEO or manager) down
(e.g., entry- level and low-level employees), and each
employee has a supervisor.
PROS:
Better defines levels of authority and responsibility
Shows who each person reports to or who to talk to about
specific projects
Motivates employees with clear career paths and chances for
promotion
Gives each employee a specialty
Creates camaraderie between employees within the same
department
CONS:
Can slow down innovation or important changes due to
increased bureaucracy
Can cause employees to act in interest of the department
instead of the company as a whole
Can make lower-level employees feel like they have less
ownership and can’t express their ideas for the company
7.NETWORK STRUCTURE
- organizes contractors and third-party vendors to carry out
certain key functions.
- It features a relatively small headquarters with geographically-
dispersed satellite offices, along with key functions outsourced
to other firms and consultants.
- A network organizational structure makes sense of the spread
of resources. It can also describe an internal structure that
focuses more on open communication and relationships rather
than hierarchy.
PROS:
Visualizes the complex web of onsite and offsite relationships in
companies
Allows companies to be more flexible and agile
Give more power to all employees to collaborate, take initiative,
and make decisions
Helps employees and stakeholders understand workflows and
processes
CONS:
Can quickly become overly complex when dealing with lots of
offsite processes
Can make it more difficult for employees to know who has final
say