The balanced scorecard is a strategic planning and management system used by businesses, governments, and non-profits worldwide to align activities with organizational vision and strategy. It was created by Robert Kaplan and David Norton in the 1990s to add non-financial metrics to traditional financial measures, providing a more balanced view of performance. The balanced scorecard has evolved from a performance measurement framework to a full strategic planning system that transforms strategic plans into daily directives. It provides metrics for learning and growth, internal business processes, customer satisfaction, and financial perspectives.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
14 views
Balanced Scorecard 01
The balanced scorecard is a strategic planning and management system used by businesses, governments, and non-profits worldwide to align activities with organizational vision and strategy. It was created by Robert Kaplan and David Norton in the 1990s to add non-financial metrics to traditional financial measures, providing a more balanced view of performance. The balanced scorecard has evolved from a performance measurement framework to a full strategic planning system that transforms strategic plans into daily directives. It provides metrics for learning and growth, internal business processes, customer satisfaction, and financial perspectives.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5
Balanced Scorecard Basics (BSC)
The balanced scorecard is a strategic planning and
management system that is used extensively in business and industry, government, and non-profit organizations worldwide to align business activities to the vision and strategy of the organization, improve internal and external communications, and monitor organization performance against strategic goals.
It was originated by Robert Kaplan (Harvard Business School)
and David Norton as a performance measurement framework that added strategic non-financial performance measures to traditional financial metrics to give managers and executives a more 'balanced' view of organizational performance.
While the phrase balanced scorecard was coined in the early
1990s, the roots of the this type of approach are deep, and include the pioneering work of General Electric on performance measurement in 1950’s and the work of French process engineers who create a "dashboard" of performance measures in the early part of the 20th century.
Gartner Group suggests that over 50% of large US firms have
adopted the BSC. More than half of major companies in the US, Europe and Asia are using balanced scorecard approaches, with use growing in those areas as well as in the Middle East and Africa. A recent global study by Bain & Co listed balanced scorecard fifth on its top ten most widely used management tools around the world. Balanced scorecard has also been selected by the editors of Harvard Business Review as one of the most influential business ideas of the past 75 years.
The balanced scorecard has evolved from its early use as a
simple performance measurement framework to a full strategic planning and management system. The “new” balanced scorecard transforms an organization’s strategic plan from an attractive but passive document into the "marching orders" for the organization on a daily basis. It provides a framework that not only provides performance measurements, but helps planners identify what should be done and measured. It enables executives to truly execute their strategies.
Kaplan and Norton describe the innovation of the
balanced scorecard as follows:
"The balanced scorecard retains traditional financial measures.
But financial measures tell the story of past events, an adequate story for industrial age companies for which investments in long-term capabilities and customer relationships were not critical for success. These financial measures are inadequate, however, for guiding and evaluating the journey that information age companies must make to create future value through investment in customers, suppliers, employees, processes, technology, and innovation."
Perspectives
The balanced scorecard suggests that we view the organization
from four perspectives, and to develop metrics, collect data and analyse it relative to each of these perspectives:
The Learning & Growth Perspective
This perspective includes employee training and corporate
cultural attitudes related to both individual and corporate self- improvement. In a knowledge worker organization, people - the only repository of knowledge, are the main resource. In the current climate of rapid technological change, it is becoming necessary for knowledge workers to be in a continuous learning mode. Learning and growth constitute the essential foundation for success of any knowledge-worker organization.
Kaplan and Norton emphasize that 'learning' is more than
'training'; it also includes things like mentors and tutors within the organization, as well as that ease of communication among workers that allows them to readily get help on a problem when it is needed. The Business Process Perspective
This perspective refers to internal business processes. Metrics
based on this perspective allow the managers to know how well their business is running, and whether its products and services conform to customer requirements (the mission).
These metrics have to be carefully designed by those who
know these processes most intimately; with our unique missions these are not something that can be developed by outside consultants.
The Customer Perspective
Recent management philosophy has shown an increasing
realization of the importance of customer focus and customer satisfaction in any business. These are leading indicators: if customers are not satisfied, they will eventually find other suppliers that will meet their needs.
Poor performance from this perspective is thus a leading
indicator of future decline, even though the current financial picture may look good.
In developing metrics for satisfaction, customers should be
analysed in terms of kinds of customers and the kinds of processes for which we are providing a product or service to those customer groups.
The Financial Perspective
Kaplan and Norton do not disregard the traditional need for
financial data. Timely and accurate funding data will always be a priority, and managers will do whatever necessary to provide it. In fact, often there is more than enough handling and processing of financial data. With the implementation of a corporate database, it is hoped that more of the processing can be centralized and automated. But the point is that the current emphasis on financials leads to the "unbalanced" situation with regard to other perspectives. There is perhaps a need to include additional financial-related data, such as risk assessment and cost-benefit data, in this category.
(AIΩN. Sezione linguistica, 14) Jens Høyrup - Sumerian - The Descendant of a Proto-Historical Creole - An Alternative Approach to the «Sumerian Problem»-Istituto Universitario Orientale (1992) PDF