CIVIL ENGINEERING LABORATORY: EXPERIMENT-2.0(b) THE EXPERIMENT: fetermine bulk density of coarse aggregate, AppARATUS REQUIRED: > Balance > Cylindrical metal > Tamping rod > Container THEORY: ® Mass concrete may contain up to 150-mm (= 6 in.ooarse aggregate. Natural mineral aggregates, ic 1680 kg/m3) and produce Normal- sand and gravel have a buk density of 95 to 108 tbe/f3 (1520 ‘Weight concrete (NWO), > Aggregates with bulk densities less than 70 los/t3 (1120 Kgim3) are called Lightweight PROCEDURE: > The measure is filled up to one third full with thoroughly mixed aggregate. > Itis tamped with 25 strokes by using the rounded end of the tamping rod. ‘Again, similar quantity is added to the measure and tamped with 25 strokes. > The measure is filed to over fowing and tamped with another 25 strokes. > The surplus aggregate is removed by using the tamping rod as a straight edge. > The weight and volume cccupied by the aggregate in the measure is determined accurately. TABULATION: [si | Particulars ‘Sampled Samples No. 1 | Capacity of measure (V) in ir Z| Mass of the measure (Mi) Ka 3 | Wass of the measure + compacted agoregate(¥2) Ka | Mass of the measure + loose aggregate(w) Ka 3] Rodded bulk density=(M2-MA)V Kgitr | Loose bulk density=(M3-MMT)/\V Kalle RESULT: Rodded bulk density = ___—________ Loose bulk density = ________—— CONCLUSION: —_—_—= Page 53 380 SEM CIVIL @ scanned with OKEN ScannerAPPARATUS REQUIRED: _ pence AIM OF THE EXPERIMENT: To determine the Grading of Road Aggregate (Metal) mm with cover and pan(G 3 TS test sieves of size-125mm, 9Omm,63mm,53rnm, 45mm. 22. 4mm. 49-2 sieves of 300 or 450 mm dia) Metal tray/sample drying tray ‘Weighing balance Sieve shaker ‘Oven having temperature range of 105°C to 115°C vvyy PROCEDURE: > The Sample(Stone Meta) Is rought To Air Dry condition ether by drying at room temperature or” 2° oven at a temperature of 100° cto 118°e. > The weight of the dried sample of stone metal is taken. > A portion of the weighed sample is placed on the upper mo: largest at the top and smallest al the bottom with collecting pan placed below it. The neat of sieves with sample is placed in the sieve shaker and sieve for about 10 to 15 minutes ‘Sleving also may be done manually by hand by giving varied motion- backward, forward vertically upward or down ward motion. At the end of sieving, any particle sticking to the sieve is removed In this way sieving of entire sample is completed in phases. > Oncompletion of sieving, weight of the material retained on each size is noted, st sieve of nest of sieve starting from the OBSERVATION AND CALCULATION:- Weight of Percentage of weight | Cumulative % of wt. | % of weight designation | sample retained (%) Retained (%) passing= (100- rotained cum. % wt. ‘30mm 63mm mm “45mm 22.4 mm 71.2 mm PAN RESULT: “The given sample of road aggregate (metal) conforms to grade = CONCLUSION: ——<——— 3} RO SEM CIVIL. Page 56 @ scanned with OKEN ScannerEXPERIMENT-2,10 AIM OF THE EXPERIMENT; To determine the Percentage of flakiness, elongation of coarse aggregate. APPARATUS REQUIRED: » IS Sieves of size 63 ,50,40,31.5,25,20,12.5,10, and 6.3mm > Thickness gauge and Length gauge THEORY: > The particle shape of the aggregate mass is determined by the percentage of flaky and elongated particles in it > Aggregates which are flaky or elongated are detrimental to higher workabiity and stably of mixes. > Shape of crushed aggregates determined by the percentage of flaky and elongated particles, > Shape of gravel determined by its angularty number. Flaky and elongated aggregate particles tend to break under heavy trafic loads. » Rounded aggregates preferred in cement concrete pavements as more workabiliy at less water cement ratio. Angular shape preferred for granular coursesifexible pavement layers due to better interlocking and hence more stabilty. Flakiness Index is the percentage by weight of particles in it, whose least dimension (Thickness) is less than three-fifths ofits mean dimension > The testis not applicable to particles Smaller than 6.3 mmin siz. % Elongation Index is the percentage by weight of particles in it, whose largest dimension (Length) is greater than one and four-fiths times its mean dimension. The testis not applicable to particles smaller than 6.3 mm in size. > > PROCEDURE: (To determine the flakiness index of coarse aggregate) > Take a sufficient quantity WI of coarse aggregate by quartering so as to provide at least 200 pieces of any fraction, > Carryout sieving by hand shake each sieve in order 63mm, 50mm,40mm,31.5mm.25mm,20mm, 1mm, 12.5mm, mm and 6.3mm over a clean dry tray for a period not less than 2 minutes. Pass the separated aagregale fractions as retained on the sieves in step 2 through the corresponding slots in the thickness gauge .the material passing through %(50+40/2)*3/5 = 27mm slot Determine the mass of aggregate passing though each ofthe slots. Find the total mass W2 of the material passing through the slots of the thickness gauge. v v Calculate the flakiness index. vy —_—_—_—_——_—_————— 80S 3RDSEM CIVIL @ scanned with OKEN ScannerNEERING LABORATORY. CIVIL ENGL Thickness gaug Ses of 99000 gained on 1S times the mean size) in through IS. sieves(mm) sioves(mnm) w @ @ 3550 a 300 500 ‘oo Se 400 318 49.50 S18 25.0 16.95 250 200 13.60 200 16.0 10.80 160 125 a 125 400 ee 100 63 oe CALCULATION: he appropriate gauge in each sieve fraction (wt) Is calculated as a > > > The mass of pices passing aoe esr mer oftne teal ruber of pieces in each ractonW1) Xt= «100 The mass of total number of pieces in ea the total mass of the whole sample (W)(i.e. cumulative weight Yi= Hixt00 The weight percentage of the mass of the pieces passing the appropriate gauge in each sieve fraction is then calculated by multiplying (X1) by (Y1) pin ‘The flakiness index is expressed as the sum of weight percentages of the material passing the .ch sieves (wt) is then calculated as a percentage of ( 1) to of sample retained on 6.3 mm sieve) > appropriate gauge in each sieve fraction. > Flakiness index l@ZP1=275~ Pla Sieve | Mass] Cumulative | Appropriate | Mass of | yq_1 PIE fraction | retained | mass gauge Size | pieces Swi xiv Size(mm) | on retained on passing 100 | x100 700 Sieve(W1) | sieve appropriate gauge(w1) 63-50 33.40 7 50-40 27.00 | 40-31.5 250 31.525 16.95 25-20 13.50 | 20-16 10.80 | 16-12.5 8.55 | 125-10 675 10-6.3 489 Total mass of the sample W= index l=5P 1 Flakiness | | (To determine tho elongation index of coarse aggregate) Take a sufficient quantity WS of coarse aggregate by quartering so as to provide at least 200 of any fraction. eee CIVIL. Page 60 @ scanned with OKEN Scanner7 Ge : CIVIL ENGINEERING LABORATORY-1 ‘ Carry out sieving by hand .shake each sieve in order : 63 ‘mn, 50mm, 40mm, 31.5mm,25mm,20mm, 16mm, 12.5mm, 10mm and 6.3mm. Pass the separated aggregate fraction as retained on the sieves in step 2 through the corresponding length gauge the material passing through 50 mm sieve and retained on 40 mm sieve Is pass through 9/5%(50+40/2) mm slot. A particle of length which cannot pass through the corresponding gauge size is taken as retained by the length gauge. Determine the mass of aggregate retained on each of the length gauge sizes. Find the total mass W4 of the material retained on the length gauges. Determine the elongation index as percentage material retained by the length gauges of the total ‘material taken for testing. Size of] Passing |g aggrega | throughis | |500 |4o |s15 |25 [20 |16 | 125 | 10 te sieve(mm) Retained z on is so/40 [31s |2s |20 [16 |125 |10 |63 sieve(mm) Length gauge (1.8 times the mean sieve s10 | 644 40s |s24 |256 [202 | 147 size, mm) CALCULATION: > The mass of the each fraction of aggregate passing and retained on specified sieve sizes are found i (Ms) and the total weight ofthe sample determined. (M=5M1) > The mass of the pieces from each fraction retained on the appropriate gauge length for each fraction is noted (m:) and the total weight determined.(m=5m:) > The elongation index Is the total mass of the material retained on the various length gauges, expressed as percentage of the total mass of the sample gauged. : =2mix109 my Leary Etovaation inden =i" 100 Sieve Wass retained | Appropriate | Mass of the pieces ion index fraction | on sieve (Wy) | gauge size retained on Elongation indox= 47 size (mm) (mm) appropriate gauge size (mi) 63-50 i 7 50-40 81.0 40-31.5 645 31.5-25 sessnsee z 25:20 405 20-16 32.4 16-12.5 “ 125-10 1083 4147 Mi =m RESULT: CONCLUSION: Page 61 henerna CIVIL @ scanned with OKEN ScannerCIVIL ENGINEERING LABORATORY-1 TABULATION: Sine | Particulars Sample-t sample-2 | 7 | | Weight of surace ary sample ay | 2 | ‘Weight of fraction passing 2.36 mm sieve (8) | 3 | | Aggregate crushing value= 2u100 shy RESULT: Aggregate crushing value (mean) = CONCLUSION: @ scanned with OKEN ScannerEXPERIMENT-2.12 AIM OF THE EXPERIMENT: To determine the Abrasion Value of aggregate. APPARATUS REQUIRED: (5. vrohss, th of PARATUS REQUIRED: US Meee Mew ihZitnte of Fri Bid a9 nie Sand eons hatte ‘ed to the ends of the cy be rotated about its axis in a hor? balls of approximately 48 mm in diameter and each v vvvy THEORY: > The principle of Los Angeles abrasion test isto find the percen between aggregates and steel balls used as abrasive charge. > Some investigators believe this test to be more dependable as rubbing ai the field conditions where both abrasion and impact occur. > Los Angeles abrasion test has been standardized by the ASTM, AASHO and also by the ISI. > Standard specification of Los Angeles abrasion values is also available for various types of pavement constructions tage wear due to relative rubbing action .nd pounding action simulate PROCEDURE: > The test sample and the Abrasive charge shall be placed in the Los Angels Abrasion testing machine rotated at a speed of 30 to 33 revimin. For grading A, B, C and D, the machine shall be rotated for 500 revolutions for grading E, F and G it shall be rotated for 1000 revolutions. > The machine shall be so driven and so counter balanced as to maintain a substantially uniform peripheral speed. If an angle is used as the shelf the machine shall be rotated in such a direction that the charge is caught on the outside surface of the angle. > At the completion of the test the material shall be discharged from the machine and a preliminary separation of the sample made on a sieve coarse than the 1.70mm IS Sieve. The finer portion shall then be sieved on a 1.70mm IS Sieve. > The material coarser that the 1.70mm IS Sieve shall be washed dried in an oven at 105 to 100% to substantially constant weight and accurately weighted to the nearest gram, TABULATION: Table-1 ‘GRADING NUMBER OF SPHERS WEIGHT OF CHARGE 2 5000225 tc 3 4584425 D @ 3330220 = 72 2500815 F 2 5000325 5000825 Page 68 @ scanned with OKEN ScannerENGINEERING LABORATORY: 2 pore] on EVE SIZE SQUARE HOLE WEIGHT IN gm OF TEST SAMPLE FOR GRAM [Rotainod + Passing mm vee | onmm | & 8 ce D E F 6 ~ = 2500 so so 2500 50 i 000 | _ 6000 < 2 3000 3000 3s ~ 3000 = 20 72.5 | 1260 |“2600- 12.5 10 4250 | 2500 10 63 200 63 475 2500 475 263 5000 Observation table Sino | Grading selected: ‘Sample-t ‘Sample-2 1. | original mass of the aggregate (M:) 2. | mass of the aggregate retained on 1.70 mm IS sieve after the test (M2) 3 | Loss in mass due to wear (Mo-Mr) 4. (a—m), Percentage of wear =r, 100 Hale mean of sample 1 and sample 2 = Loss-Angeles abrasion value is equal to CONCLUSION: a @ scanned with OKEN ScannerCIVIL ENGINEERIN ExPERIMENT2-13 ‘AIM OF THE EXPERIMENT: To determine the impact value ofthe roae aagre09e APPARATUS REQUIRED: > Impacttest apparatus > Sieve-IS sieve of sizes 12.5, 10 and 2.96 > Tamping rod ion, 40 min ameter and 230 mim ng > Metal eytinder~a cylindrical meta tamping rod of cclar 2°00" rounded at one end > Weighing baiance THEORY: fat resiat pact ction ot Toughness the property of mae % Due'to te oa, te road siones ae 6 possi af sane breaking ito sale EE. > Thovead stones shel therfore be ough eno Rest cesignes evant the oughese of nes 12, ‘efetoe impacts may be cal an pet te fo road tones ib ‘eppanaal None specmors asin Pape Inpct et on soe OSH ina ore ere aka out now a-dys aes leo been omiteg Slander resting rineral gaeasies Fea ta impact ten es ben standardized by the Bash standart Standard lntuton > “The egregate pec va ing shock orarimpact wich n some aprenate > The method of fst covers the provedue for do aggregates, jected to the pounding ture under impact. the stones to fracture under rt test may either be carried out on gates as in aggregate impact test, ym the revised British {5 institution and the Indian icales a relative measure of the resistance of an aggregate to a sudden fers from its resistance to a slow compressive load, termining the aggregate impact value of coarse PROCEDURE: > Sieve the material through 12.5mm and10,0mm IS sieve, The aggregate passing through 12.5mm sieve ‘and retained in 10.0 mm sieve comprises the best material. Pour the aggregate to fll about just 1/3 rd depth by measuring cylinder. Compact the aggregate by giving 25 gente blows with the rounded and pointed end o the tamping rod. ‘Add two more layer in sirilar manner, so that cylinder is become ful, ‘Strike off the surplus aggregate. Determine the weight of the aggregate to the nearest gram (Wt). Bring the impact machine to rest without wedging or packing upon the level plate, block or floor, so that itis rigid and the hammer guide columns are vertical Fix the cup firmly in position on the base of ma compact by giving 25 gentle strokes with tamping rod. > Raise the hammer unti its lower face is 380 mm above the surface of the aggregate sample in the and allow it to fall freely on the aggregate sample, Give 15 such blows at an interval of than cone second between successive fall. ene > Remove the crushed aggregate from the cup and sieve significant amount passes in one minute, 4 through 2.36mm IS sieve unt no furhe! > Weigh the fraction passing the sieve to an accur the sieve. ‘acy of 1 gm (W2). Also weigh the fraction retained ® nn 380SEM CIVIL Page 72 vyvyyy 'e and place whole of the test sample in it and v @ scanned with OKEN ScannerCIVIL ENGINEERING LABORATORY-1 eaoncnn or tna, Cbservation in the performance and compute the impact aggregate impact value. The mean of the two ebservation rounded to nearest whole number is reported as the “Aggregate imp: value" TABULATION: SL.NO. NETWEIGHTOF |THE FRACTION | THEFRACTION | AGGREGATE | AGGREGATE PASSING RETAINED ON IMPACT VALUE | IN gm, THROUGH 236mm SIEVE. | By 499, (A) 2.36mm SIEVE. (8) | (C) 4 RESULT: Aggregate impact value (mean) = CONCLUSION: @ scanned with OKEN Scannerai & e \ . UL ENGINEERING LABORATORY-1 Ch EXPERINENT.3(a) a OF THE EXPERIMENT: qzdetermine the compressive strength of concrete by ret ee : mn rength te by rebound 7 ,gPARATUS REQUIRED: > Rebound hammer 5 Comeressive testhng machine sa0CEDURE: DE escheat and Sy surface is selecte Ae pelo cone is selected. loosely adhering is present ee impact chosen atleast 20 snare wey bom ‘edge or shape aiscontinulty Deby enpcinieeet ry saat at ght angle 1 the SuTace Ch the n conducted horizontally on vert verticaly upward ee s maty on vorieal surfaces or vertical UPW a on, the rebound hammer ean be held st per wil be diferent forthe same concrete. tet, the rebound hammer is kept over the test surface and given compressive tolled MASS, { this should be rubbed inner meclate angle also: But in e8c" the reading id noted against the red pointer mark. Rebound the appropriate nomogram oF 93h ‘attached on the sed for reuse of the hammer atthe next point Sef gueted around all the points of observation ° all accessible faces of the and average of these cpservation, si reading of rebound indicates are taken send index fr the point of observation” crore as pet I$ 6900 become the re grout, spelled of tooled surface do not given sive strength____—— RESULT: compres SULT: Rebound index forte point of observation and expected CONCLUSION: @ scanned with OKEN ScannerCIVIL ENGINEERING LABORATOR’ TABULATION: Specimen Sino | particulars 1 2 3 : Mass of cylinder.(M1) 2 Mass of cylinder +concrete falling standard 2 height.(M2) 3 ‘Mass of concrete (Wa)=(Mz-Mr) kg 4 ‘Mass of cylinder + fully compacted conerete(W) 5 Mass of fully compacted concrete Ms=(Mi-M1) = 6 Compacting factor =M2 RESULT: The compacting factor of given concrete mix= CONCLUSION: @ scanned with OKEN Scanner,m OFAfTE EXPERIMENT: Uh germine the workability of cone rete by Compaction factor test. paRATUS REQUIRED: Compaction factor te a ‘Stop watch Trowel Tamping rod of 16 mi Im dia. And 610 mmtong Ae y vy qHEORY: ‘>The compaction factor i ris defined of fully cor as the rat eee . ad concrete 10 ofthe weight of partially compacted concrete to the weight > actor testis desk field sts designed primary for use in the laboratory but oan als be weed } Itis more precise hy eee src selina ta oor teat andis partly usetl for concrete mixes of VF 4 normally used when conerete isto be compacted by Veraton. pROGEDURE > The test consists essentially of a spplying a standard amount of stand eet te ag compat yunt of work to st jard quantity of concrete and Keep the ‘compaction factor apparatus on @ evel ground and apply grease on the inner surface of the hoppers and cylinder. > Fasten the flap doors. 5 Weigh the empty cylinder ceurately and rte dwn he mass 38 ka, at ix the cylinder onthe base wit fy nuts and bos n such away Tal Se central points of Roppers and sylinder ie on one vertical ine Gover the eylnder with plate > Four mixes are to be prepared with water CONES Mr otby mase).50,0.60,0.70.0.80 respectively. for teach mix take 9 ka of 209 og of 39nd 2.25 x9 of cement ‘hath each mix proceed 2s fol: > Mix sand and cement py ntl rate of UNO oor obtained. now mx the coarse aggregate ure nt coarse ane ny routed thoughout Ba i fo the above mature an jstporougiy unl concrete apPeaTS 1 be er hopper gently and carefully with hat homogene > Fill the freshly mixed concrete | ver compacting: seloas p door a0 tat coreete nay fat in ote oer oper ND the > after two rind nerete may fa d compacin | rest, open tne WP door of lowe hopper and allow the he to st dard compaction. a immediate oie finder nang an aero Paine in each hand wit Blades oe i a rc sntre with sawing mation. > Rem aes crea mete rate A ep ed prorizontal sae them form “dos por ind the mass of ‘partially compa ‘om all si ini eto n approximate anv ayers, wraing €00 VEF acted concrete Lette mass Pe @ scanned with OKEN Scanner\ ERING LABORATORY-1 EXPERIMENT-2.2/2) THE PERIMENT, moreactity of concrete by sure test. ae aannks pre tte etn pre yo eb cen eee 5 aap neg evi ln bs nats c ae ledge ism —— 7 Sure ee § he most commony used meted of messuring consistency of concrete which can be Seine: eter torsary or at ste fare, fate sutesie metho tor very wat or very cry conerete, 7 Bes oo ~eesirs al Score contbuting so woreatilly, rer is it always representative of the acenlity Ste cron 2 Rtdiosss the Serscersic of concrete ir actitien te the siume value. #36 avons sures every ¢ ' calec Tue slug. If cre half cf the cone slides down, itis called wersure Fass 8 Seat Sure. He Sue vais is measures as the diference in height between the height of Pe Toc enc he averse usiue cf me subsidence PROCEDURE 7 Geen fe Sure core are tsee Bon ror-corsus ciation in such a way thet t0em dia. side (on the top Fon de Ste are tomar: weigh te coarse aqgrecate the sarc the cemertintre ao of at 5 Rete eet cass in a bucket are mix uc cry form unt a uriferm colors attained ES RES OF weight oe ccarse ecgrecats arc sarc and mix the aggregate with water % Agat sce ceri % of mater of re te! maser ‘the cone with prepared mix, in layers ath ect seceding mors tar 7 minutes ure the height of this subsided i msigets wit rescect Repeat te exrerirent with diferent sercectace of wae ris citference is said to be the slurs. VATION: Measures value of sumc= RESU The stump of CONCLUSION: Sonrets mie Page 84 @ scanned with OKEN Scanner4 \ © CIVIL ENGINEER OPSERVATION AND TABULATION: Concrote mx details: Dato of testing: Typo of spacimen: Cube cylinder, ato of casting: Age at tosting: size of specimen — SL.NO Compressive | Avg. strength | compressive (ina) strongth (Mpa) Spocimon Rof, | Su*face area | Load at failure of specimen | (KN) RESULT: ‘The compressive strength of concrete after + Days=. CONCLUSION: poids Page @ scanned with OKEN ScannerCIVIL ENGINEERING LABORATORY-1 EXPERIMENT-3.1, AIM OF THE EXPERIMENT: To determine compressive strength of 1 3 proportion concrete cubes. PPARATUS REQUIRED: > Cubes moulds of size 150 mm sides, G.ltray concrete mixing and trowel Tamping rod 16 mm aia. And 60 cm long with one end bullet pointed Vibration table Compression testing machine- 100 ton capacity minimum Laboratory mini concrete mixture, vyvyy i Compressive strength of concrete is very important because concrete is primarily subjected to Compressive stresses, Other properties like bending and split tensile stre ‘strength. > For given set of materials and fixed ‘abrasion and volume stability im; water-cement ratio. With the increase of compressive strength > ngth, elastic modulus ete. are related to compressive Proportion s, the compressive strength of concrete Resistance to proves with the increased compressive strength depends upon the > Necessary quantities of ingredients are taken and uniformly mixed to get the fesh cconerete either ‘manually or by mini concrete mixture, % The moulds are filed with conerete in layers of 5 cm thick with symmetrical distribution, > I compaction is done manually by hand, the concrete is tamped with standerd fod, the strokes being The oes ps ovr te cross-section of he mould Fr 150 mm cubes, 26 stokes per layer is given, ne des ofthe moulds are tapped to clos the voids et by the tamping vod, Or ane compaction isto bbe done by vibration about 3 minutes vibration is given to > Atleast three specimens are tested immedi after wiping out the water from the surfaces, The dimensions of the specimen are notes iately on removed from water, whi opposite lateral sides ofa cube but not onthe top or bottom surface of sy Tregeet is spoled slowly without shack atthe rte of 14 Nin minutes tthe sabe reek, {2ading should be done al the centre ofthe specimen without ary eecentiiy ‘er Breaking ofthe cubes he pattem of cube crushing including he rupture planes are observed and ‘examined to distinguish the type of failure. a8 cast cube, vvy 3R0 SEM CIVIL iarmars Page 80 @ scanned with OKEN ScannerCIVIL ENGINEERING LABORATORY-I Size TOmm to 475mm ao 20 mm to 10 mm D00-g (consisting of 12.5 mm to 10 mm = 33% and 20 mm to 12.5 mm = 67%) 40 mm to 20 mm "7500 g (consisting of 25 mm to 20 mm = 33% and 5 ‘40 mm to 25 mm = 67%) S mm to 40 mm 3000 g (Consisting of 50 mm to 40 mm = 50% and ‘63 mm to 60. mm = 50%) ‘80 mm and larger Take proper weight of sample from each fracion and place Win Separate containers for the test PRECAUTIONS: =CACTangements Are Made To Ensure That The Volume Of The Solution In Which Samples Are Immersed Is At Least Five Times The Volumes Of The Sample Immersed At Any Time > Grading Of The Sample And Weights Of The Test Fractions Should Be Taken Accurately > Jest Results By The Use Of The Two Salts May Differ Considerably And Care Is ‘Taken In Fixing Proper Limits In Any Specification OBSERVATION AND CALCULATION: ‘Type of reagent used: ‘Type of coarse aggregate sample umber of cycles _ Sieve size, mm Grading Of Original | Weight of "| Percontage: Weighted t Sample% test fraction ing finer | average Passi i before the | sieve after test | (correctoy een a a test.9 {actual loss) _ | % loss) 60 40 40 20 20 10 104 7 No. of particles coarser than 20 st Humber of particles affected, as classified as the number Passing Retained Number before disintegration splitting, crumbling test veracking oF flaking | Fomm 2omm | L 6Omm 40mm | RESULT: Percentage of loss of weigt CONcLusio} De @ scanned with OKEN ScannerCIVIL ENGINEERING LABORATOR‘ i ————_— EXPERIMENT-2.14 THe EXPERIMENT: Herning the Soundnesa Tost of Road Aggregate Container for the aggregate Balance of capacity * Oven 0mm, 63mm, Is slovon ~4.76mm, 8mm, 10mm, 12.6mm, 16mm, 20mm, 25mm, 31.6mm, 4mm, 5 ‘80m CHEMICAL SOLUTION > Sodium Sulphate Solution > Magnosium Sulphate Solution \ Proctoure | i Take individual samples in a wie mesh basket and immerse it in the solution of sodium sulphate or ‘magnesium sul iphate for not fess than 16 hours nor more than 18 hours, in such @ manner that the Solution covers them to a depth of atleast 1 mm. ‘Ater completion of te Immersion petod, remove the samples from solution and allow it to drain for 1§ ‘minutes and place it in drying oven, > Dry the sample unt attains @ constant mass and then remove it from oven and coe! it to room tomperature, ‘Mier cooling again immerse itn the solution as described in step-1 1 ‘The process of altemate immersion and drying is repeated unt the specited number of cycles as ‘agreed between the purchaser and the vendor is obtained, After completion of the final cyel Sulphate or magnesium sulphat wash water with barium chloride, » Sizo of Aggrogate Sieve used to determine loss 63mmito 40mm Team ) mm to 20 mm 160 mr mmo 10 mm, 8.0mm 410mm to 4.75 mm 40mm PREPARATION OF TEST SAMPI i LE FOR COARSE AGGREGATE > Wash the coarse aggregate through 4.75 mm IS sieve ‘and dry the material reta oven maintained at a temp of 105 to 140°C, tlt attains ined on the sieve in an @ constant mass, Sieve the cred sample to separate into diferent size fractions using sieves of sizes 80 mm, 63 mm, 40:mm, 20 mm, 10 mm, 4.75 mm, > The sample should be of such an amount that it will yleld not tess different sizes, which shall be available in a than the following amount of the amounts of § percent oF mor f re. 38D SEM CIVIL Page 76 @ scanned with OKEN ScannerTRS mstace of Deo rate carts SCE ar me art Oe oa at he mee Ree ee ee oe @ scanned with OKEN ScannerCIVIL ENGINEERING LABORATORY-| 2) EXPERIMENT-2 700) EXPERIMENT the buing factor of tne Aggregates (sand) weeps the neighboring particles sway © scanned with OKEN ScannerroRY: ORATOR EERING LAB! $ CIVIL ENGINE 16)| Determination of Crushing Value Test of aggregates, |_—___—-— pss ict GRA EEE cae Oe To Determine Abrasion value of aggregate. To Determine Impact test of © | aggregate, Soundness Test of Road aggregates. 20)| Determination of Compressive ~"| Strength of concrete cubes Determination of Workabilty of + | Concrete by Slump Cone method 22)| Determination of Workability of concrete by Compaction Factor method. 23)) Non ~ Destructive Test On Concrete By Rebound Hammer Test, @ scanned with OKEN ScannerCIVIL ENGINEERING LABORATORY-1 NAME OF THE EXPERIMENT DEPOSITED ON CHECKED ON REMARKS -» | Determination of Young's Modulus in )_ | tensite testing machine (UTM) Determination of fineness of Cement y Slevin —~ Determination of normal Consistency of Cement | Determination of nial and final 44) | setting time of cement, Determination of soundness of Cement by Le - Chetelier apparatus, ~ | Determination of Compressive ‘Strength of cement Determination of Compressive ‘Strength of Burt clay building brick, Grading of Fine aggregate by sieve analysis for concrete Grading of Coarse aggregate by ‘analysis for concrete ination of Specific Gravity of ‘sand | Determination of Bulking factor of sand ‘Determination of Specific Gravity of ‘coarse aggregate. Determination of Bulk density of aggregate i of Road Aggregates(meta) Determination of Flakiness, Jaton & Angularty of Road tes. @ scanned with OKEN Scanner