The Literature Tendencies of The Restora
The Literature Tendencies of The Restora
Abstract
The Restoration Age is probably one of the most interesting and important, if not one
of the richest, periods in the history of English literature. Though not marked by an exuberant
growth of drama as the Elizabethan Age, of poetry as the Romantic Age, or of Criticism as
the modern Age, the Restoration Age remains a very important and interesting period for the
student of literature because it gave birth to modern English prose and because it marks the
birth of modern English criticism formulated on the classical dogma of the ancients. It is
important because it witnessed the birth and growth of many important literary movements,
of many new species of literature in the field of poetry and drama, because it innovated and
perfected many forms of literary expression. If we make a careful perusal of the history of
English literature and of the social and political trends we come to know that a change began
to come over the spirit of English literature about the middle of the seventeenth century
which was not due to any fluctuations in literary fashion but was deep rooted in the life of the
time.
Introduction
The Age of Renaissance was an age of expansion – spiritual and material. For the first
time Englishmen realized their national solidarity. Emancipated from continental struggles,
their loyalty to the queen, their pride in the country and their delight in country’s past are
reflected in the Faerie Queene and historical dramas of Marlowe and Shakespeare. But the
emotional excitement and zeal could not be sustained for long and its splendid exuberance
had degenerated into extravagance and violence in the early years of the seventeenth century.
The drama was in more critical state than poetry.
The Restoration Comedy has been termed as comedy of manners as manners, modes
and conventions of the upper classes of society are reflected in it. Since at this time upper
strata of society was one which was patronized by Charles II and his courtly circle of wits,
the comedy written at this time, chose to depict the ethos of that class only. The comedy of
manners is said to be written on the lines of the realistic comedy as written by Ben Jonson in
England and Moliere in France. Moliere provided the English dramatists with ideas for plot
and comic characterization.
The exponents of new empirical philosophy were Hobbes and Locke, and their
principles and discoveries were definitely in favour of rationalism and realism as opposed to
the element of supernatural mystery and extravagances of uncontrolled Fancy.
The age of Dryden was dominated by Hobbes, who sought to banish the old
machinery of ghosts and fairies from the domain of serious literature and confine even poetic
activity to the sphere of the probable and rational. But he was the first philosopher to attempt
a psychological approach to the problem of the poetic or creative process. He analysed the
components of the human mind itself, and explained the nature and function of the faculties
requisite for poetic creation. He singles out Fancy and Judgment for special consideration.
The Restoration, thus, was a period of considerable poetic activity as well as of great
critical confusion. The critics of the period were faced with rival creeds and theories which
stood sharply opposed to each other; the Ancient vs the Modern; the contemporary classical
French drama and the irregular or romantic Elizabethan drama; the vigorous but rough
literature, Medieval and Elizabethan vs the refined products of the cultivated wits in
contemporary England.
John Dryden
Courtesy: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/art/art-news/5157883/Newly-discovered-
painting-of-John-Dryden-the-first-Poet-Laureate.html
Returning to London during The Protectorate, Dryden obtained work with Cromwell's
Secretary of State, John Thurloe. This appointment may have been the result of influence
exercised on his behalf by his cousin the Lord Chamberlain, Sir Gilbert Pickering. At
Cromwell's funeral on 23 November 1658 Dryden processed with the Puritan poets John
Milton and Andrew Marvell. Shortly thereafter he published his first important poem, Heroic
Stanzas (1658), a eulogy on Cromwell's death which is cautious and prudent in its emotional
display.
Language in India www.languageinindia.com ISSN 1930-2940 15:6 June 2015
Dr. Roshni Duhan, Ph.D. (Law), M.A. (English)
The Literature Tendencies of the Restoration Age in the Perspectives of John Dryden and
Robert Burns 126
In 1660 Dryden celebrated the Restoration of the monarchy and the return of Charles
II with Astraea Redux, an authentic royalist panegyric. In this work the interregnum is
illustrated as a time of anarchy, and Charles is seen as the restorer of peace and order.
Dryden’s Satire
Dryden's greatest achievements were in satiric verse: the mock-heroic Mac Flecknoe,
a more personal product of his Laureate years, was a lampoon circulated in manuscript and an
attack on the playwright Thomas Shadwell. Dryden's main goal in the work is to "satirize
Shadwell, ostensibly for his offenses against literature but more immediately we may suppose
for his habitual badgering of him on the stage and in print."[2] It is not a belittling form of
satire, but rather one which makes his object great in ways which are unexpected, transferring
the ridiculous into poetry.[3]
This line of satire continued with Absalom and Achitophel (1681) and The
Medal (1682). His other major works from this period are the religious poems Religio
Laici (1682), written from the position of a member of the Church of England; his 1683
edition of Plutarch's Lives Translated From the Greek by Several Hands in which he
introduced the word biography to English readers; and The Hind and the Panther,(1687)
which celebrates his conversion to Roman Catholicism.
Dryden appears to be making a distinction between the term ‘poem’ and ‘satire’
similar to that made by Aristotle between ‘poetry’ and ‘history’. A ‘poem’ is possibly better,
because more universal, more elevated, than a ‘satire’, which is too particularly related to
historical circumstances, and Dryden is therefore freed, by his choice of term, to make a more
inclusive commentary on human affairs[4]. He is able in this way to amalgamate the activities
of the poet and the satirist in a poem which, while drawing its inspiration from particular men
and the vicissitudes of their political careers, yet rises above its sources and benefits from the
characteristic effects of satire without being restricted to them[5]. In Aristotle’s words, it
becomes ‘more philosophic and of graver import’, and it draws only on the satiric, but also on
Language in India www.languageinindia.com ISSN 1930-2940 15:6 June 2015
Dr. Roshni Duhan, Ph.D. (Law), M.A. (English)
The Literature Tendencies of the Restoration Age in the Perspectives of John Dryden and
Robert Burns 127
various other literary modes – epic elegiac, panegyric, allegoric and incorporates several
kinds or styles of presentation dramatic speeches, sections of narrative, passages of rhetorical
argument and formal portraits or ‘characters’.
In his preface Dryden disclaimed the role of inventor and claimed that of historian,
‘Were I the Inventor, who am only the Historian… This disclaimer, however, is merely part
of the thin pretend that the poem is sheer Jewish history based on Second Samuel. It is a
gesture of modesty over the designedly evident fact of the invention exhibited in the
combination of the two histories. Moreover, the use of Jewish history emphasizes the
valuative aspect of the history that is drawn from a sacred book. The whole Judaeo-Christian
tradition has operated to transmute the history of the Jews into a moral order.
What was even more intolerable was the fact that their images and relics were
disrespected and thrown into the fire like common wood. They could not bear such insults
and as a result, they were compelled to do something against the government. This ultimately
resulted in the Popish Plot of 1678. Here, Dryden refers to the disabilities suffered by the
Jebusites (Roman Catholics). Their life became intolerable and as such they were compelled
to do something against the government. The poet describes the political environment of the
time in which it was easy for the anti-royalist party to raise a revolt against the King. Dryden
here satirises the priests whether Catholics or Protestants.
Shaftesbury was like an insolvent debtor of his physique. He was extravagant, devoid
of comfort. In Platonic language he was a two-legged unfeathered animal. He was false,
hateful and doomed to destruction than to rule a state. He broke the triple bond to gain power.
Shaftesbury actively promoted war against Holland in March 1672 by breaking the Triple
Alliance between England, Sweden and Holland.
Dryden’s Preference for Calling Absalom and Architophel ‘A Poem’ and not ‘A Satire’
In his note to the reader prefixed to Absalom and Architophel, Dryden calls it “a
poem” and not a satire, the term which he uses to describe MacFlecknoe and the Metal. The
word “poem” in Dryden’s view meant a long story verse, an epic or heroic poem or a play
like an epic. The distinction between a “poem” and a “satire” was clear. A satire had specific
aims and limitations proper to itself as lower genre and was not expected to have so larger a
moral responsibility when he calls Absalom and Architophel a poem. Dryden also assumes
the freedom to make it a general criticism of life. The poem though, occasional in its
inception, goes beyond its occasion and penetrates to the elements inseparable from the
human condition.
regarded as a pioneer of the Romantic movement, and after his death he became a great
source of inspiration to the founders of both liberalism and socialism, and a cultural icon in
Scotland and among the Scottish Diaspora around the world[6].
Celebration of Burns’ life and work became almost a national charismatic cult during
the 19th and 20th centuries, and his influence has long been strong on Scottish literature. In
2009 he was chosen as the greatest Scot by the Scottish public in a vote run by Scottish
television channel STV. As well as making original compositions, Burns also collected folk
songs from across Scotland, often revising or adapting them. His poem (and song) "Auld
Lang Syne" is often sung at Hogmanay (the last day of the year), and "Scots Wha Hae"
served for a long time as an unofficial national anthem of the country. Other poems and songs
of Burns that remain well known across the world today include "A Red, Red Rose"; "A
Man's a Man for A' That"; "To a Louse"; "To a Mouse"; "The Battle of Sherramuir"; "Tam o'
Shanter"; and "Ae Fond Kiss"[7][8].
Since Cowper’s dates (1731 – 1800) are exactly a century later than Dryden’s, it
seems useful to compare these last voices in the neoclassic choir (if indeed they belong there)
with the tones of Dryden and Pope, the actual founders of the neoclassical tradition in English
poetry. Obviously the century elapsed has grown tender; Burns and Cowper both write
satires, but their satires are relatively good-humoured, perhaps a little too much good-
humoured. Cowper’s satire in particular lacks hardness, flash and cutting edge. Burns, like
Dryden and Pope, has sympathetic generalized observations to make about man; but like
Blake and Cowper, he is most aroused concerning underprivileged man. Burns and Blake
show faith in progress and in the ability of man to achieve his own destiny. Like Dryden and
Pope, Cowper shows a sense of man’s limitations.
Like William Cowper, Burns is also known to be largely a poet of emotion. But
whereas Cowper had liking for environment for its own sake, Burns loved it for the human
relationship implied in it. His poem, The Cotter’s Saturday Night, is an obvious illustration.
Burns also found his local background a grim stimulus towards an escape to a larger life. In
his view, this life was the just destiny of all men in a state of freedom. Burns was by no
means so untaught as this quoted stanza would seem to say. But this stanza constitutes at least
a declaration of poetical independence of learning. On the other hand, it is an implicit
reaffirmation of the favourite dogma of the century, “Nature is nature wherever placed.” The
ability of “the force of Nature” to reach the heights, if unhindered, or even to reach despite
hindrance, had been a cherished notion throughout the Augustan age. Burns can be said to be
a complete demonstration of this idea. It may also be noted that, later in the nineteenth
century, natural genius will be regarded as “spontaneity” rather than untaught. But Burns was
not all for spontaneity; he always felt proud of his careful revision of his poems.
It is the poet who makes it universal by his treatment. He sublimates the earthly
material. He captures the breath and finer spirit “of his people, which, more than all others, is
inconceivable without songs.
Such ways of working could be shown at endless length in the case of Burns. He took
whatever served him, and did what he would with it, with unfailing instinct. Also, as his
manuscripts often show, he gave to it a ceaseless care and revision, which is most striking in
some of the most artless-seeming and reeled-off ditties. “O saw ye home Lesley” is a piece of
gallantery of his own, in honour of a real Miss Leslie Baillie, when he accompanied her, with
her father, on a ride southward.
Burns’ Style
Burn’s poem is not, like Fergusson’s written “in their native language”. It is written,
on the contrary, substantially in modern English with, here and there, a sparse sprinkling of
Scottish, or Scoto English, terms. It is for this reason that it has been called a hybrid, for it
mixes the English and the Scottish traits together. Much of this poem’s tone, many of its
sentiments and portions of its phraseology are reminiscent of those of the English poets
whom Burns knew. These poets are Milton, Gray, Pope, Thomson and Goldsmith. The poem
Language in India www.languageinindia.com ISSN 1930-2940 15:6 June 2015
Dr. Roshni Duhan, Ph.D. (Law), M.A. (English)
The Literature Tendencies of the Restoration Age in the Perspectives of John Dryden and
Robert Burns 134
comes out as a kind of medley of ideas and phrases partly borrowed from them, very much in
the manner of Grey’s poetry.
Burns mixes these borrowings with reflections of his own and descriptions partly in
their manner but derived from his own experience. It may in fact be termed a splendidly
specious adaptation rather than quite an original composition. However, in The Coller’s
Saturday Night there is a genuine pulse of poetry under an occasionally unreal, or rather
uncongenial phraseology. As Burns himself tells us, he had “greeted by his father’s fireside”
whilst composing it.
The workmanship of the English parts of the poem has been, quite often,
underestimated. But at other times, he would turn out, in uncomfortable poetical or rhetorical
diction, his utterances of revulsion and repentance. The poet’s devotion though honest
enough, has gone rather hectic.
However, we must not forget that no such legacy of form can be one of form alone.
We know how the soul of Burns was itself an inheritance. That tone of fetal familiarity, for
one thing, before which everything goes down, is deep in the Scottish character. It is a
feature, it will not be too much to say, even of its religious himself Burns emerges a free-
loving peasant amorist, as he does in The Cotter’s Saturday Night, living at first by semi-
polygamous country custom, full of passion, blatancy, fickleness, tenderness, fun, true and
untrue sentiment, unchivlary, repentances, and domestic feeling, and if he enjoys and
struggles accordingly, well, it is idle to pity him alone. We must take generations of his
peasant forbears under the wing of our patronage or condonation, and praise nor does he
show us every kind. But, on the whole, Burns is a far more superb figure and represents a
richer type, than any which it lay within the plan or perhaps the ability of Scott to portray.
Finally, in The Cotter’s Saturday Night Burns affects for a time the slow pensive movement
of his Spenserian model.
As the poem progresses in the above quoted liturgical manner, the speaker’s appalling
complacency and egotism, even to the speaker himself, as humility, are cumulatively
revealed. Burns does not portray Holy Willie a conscious hypocrite. Thus, Holy Willie’s
Prayer is wholly satirical in tone. The poem can be considered a mere material chain of
brilliantly relentless mockery. Burns makes this mockery serve both a general and a special
purpose.
Burns’s manuscripts, as well as his comments to Johnson, show his fidelity to this
creed. One can connect it, on one side, with his study of Pope and Addison. On the other, it
recalls that of his contemporary Blake, who preached gospel of execution, or of firm
determinate outline. Burns’s thrift and precision are among his greater attributes as a poet. It
does not at all seem fair to read The Jolly Beggars immediately before passing to the humours
of the middle-class topers in Guy Mannering. The Jolly Beggars is Burns’s longest, best
harmonize, and most magnificent production, perfectly harmonious in its uproar. It is without
even one flagging moment in its ever varying bravura.
As is clear from these three poems, his satire is as distinctively Burnsian as anything
else he wrote. He is too individualistic to be easily grouped with any literary movement or
style. He does seem to be as unique as Blake was, or Byron was. But behind all the variety of
Language in India www.languageinindia.com ISSN 1930-2940 15:6 June 2015
Dr. Roshni Duhan, Ph.D. (Law), M.A. (English)
The Literature Tendencies of the Restoration Age in the Perspectives of John Dryden and
Robert Burns 137
subject and style, mode and method, there is an essence of the life and temper of his country
which Burns represents, and this essence can be described as the freedom of the natural soul.
==================================================================
References
1. John Dryden The Major Works, ed. by Keith Walker, (Oxford: Oxford University Press,
1987).
2. Oden, Richard, L. Dryden and Shadwell, The Literary Controversy and 'Mac Flecknoe'
(1668–1679).
3. Eliot, T. S., 'John Dryden', in Selected Essays, (London: Faber and Faber, 1932), 308.
4. Maurer, A.E. Wallace. "The Form Of Dryden's Absalom And Achitophel, Once
More."Papers On Language & Literature 27.3 (1991): 320. Academic Search Premier.
6. "Mauchline kirk session records, National Archives of Scotland". 'The Legacy of Robert
Burns's feature on the National Archives of Scotland website. National Archives of Scotland.
1 July 2009.
8. Hans Hecht, Robert Burns: The Man and His Work (London: Hodge, 1936).
10. Kurl Wittig, The Scottish Tradition in Literature (Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd, 1958).