Outline & Cases in Criminal Procedure

I. I. INTRODUCTION
A. Substantive Law vs. Remedial Law
1. Bustos v. Lucero, 80 Ph ii. 640
2. Fabian v. Desierto, 356 Phil. 787 (1998).
3. People v. Lacson, G.R. No. 149453, April 1, 2003
B. Rule-making Power of the Supreme Court
1. Estipona V. Lobrigo, G.R. No. 226679, August 15, 2017
2. Echegaray v. Secretary of Justice, 301 SCRA 96 (1999)
3. Kuizon v. Desierto, G.R. No. 140619, March 9, 2001
4. Neypes v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 141524, September
14, 2005
5. Sumbilla v. Matrix Finance, C R. No. 197582, June 29,
2015
C. Retroactivity of Rules of Procedure
1. People v. Besmonte, G.R. No. 137278-79, February 17,
2003
2. Subido v. Sandiganbayan, G R. No. 122641, January 20,
1997
D. Due Process in General
1. Dy v. People, G.R. No. 189081, August 10 9 2016
2. City of Manila v. Lagulo, G.R. No. 118127; April 12, 2015
E. Criminal Due Process
1. Alonte v. Savellano, Jr., 287 SCRA 245 (1998)
2. Galman v. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 72670, September 12,
1986.
3. People v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 118882, September
26, 1996.
4. Escobar v. People, G.R. No. 205576, November 20, 2017
F. Injunctions against criminal prosecutions
1. Hemandez v. Albano, 19 SCRA 95 (1967)
2. Brocka v. Enrile, 192 SCRA 183 (1990)
3. Defensor-Santiago v. Vasquez, 205 SCRA 162 (1992)
II. II. JURISDICTION
A. Jurisdiction of criminal courts
1. Metropolitan Trial Courts, Municipal Trial Court,
Municipal Circuit Trial Courts (Exclusive, Original and
 Special)
a) B.P. 129, R.A. 7691 (Expanding Jurisdiction of MetTC,
MTC, MCTC)
b) REV. RULE ON SUMMARY PROCEDURE (1991), Secs.
I.B, 11-23
2. Regional Trial Courts (Exclusive, Original, Appellate and
Special)
a) B.P. 129; Art. 360, Revised Penal Code
3. Court of Appeals (Exclusive Original, Concurrent and
Appellate)
a) B.P. 129 (Judiciary Reorganization Act of 1980)
4. Supreme Court (Exclusive Original, Concurrent and
Appellate)
a) Sec. 1 (Judicial Review), Sec. 4(2), Sec. 5(1), Sec. 5(2),
1987 Constitution
5. Sandiganbayan (Exclusive Original and Appellate)
a) Sec. 4, Art. XI, 1987 Constitution; P.D. 1606, amended
by R.A. 7975, R.A. 8249
6. A.M. No. 02-6-07-SB dated 28 August 2002
7. A.M. No. 02-1-18-SC dated 28 February 2002
8. A.M. No. 10-3-10-SC dated 18 October 2011, Rule 10-15
9. A.M. No. 09-6-8-SC dated 13 April 2010, IV, Rules 9-18
B. Requisites for Exercise of Criminal Jurisdiction
1. Cases
a) Trenas vs. People, 664 SCRA 355
b) Lacson vs. Executive Secretary, 301 SCRA 298
c) People vs. Lagon, 185 SCRA 442
d) Asistio vs. People, G.R. No. 200465, 20 April 2015
C. Jurisdiction over the offense
1. Alfelor, Sr. v. Intia, 70 SCRA 460 (1976)
2. Uy v. CA, 276 SCRA 367 (1997)
3. People v. Lagon, 185 SCRA 442 (1990)
4. De Lima v. Guerrero, G.R. No. 229781, 10 October 2017
D. Jurisdiction over the accused
1. Rivera v. CA, 332 SCRA 416 (2000)
E. Cases
1. Morillo vs. People, 777 SCRA 207
 2. Chiok vs. People, 776 SCRA 120*
3. Laude vs. Ginez-Jabalde, 775 SCRA 408
4. Atienza vs. People, 716 SCRA 84
5. Ombudsman vs. Dechavez, 709 SCRA 375
6. Garcia vs. Executive Secretary, 677 SCRA 751
7. People vs. Sandiganbayan, 630 SCRA 489
III. III. POLICE INVESTIGATION
A. CONST., Art. Ill, Secs. 3, 12 and 17
B. Statutes/Rules
1. Rep. Act No. 7438 (1992)
2. REV. PEN, CODE, Art. 125
3. Rep. Act No. 4200 (1965)
4. Rep. Act No. 9372 (2007)
5. Rep, Act No. 1405 (1955), as amended
6. Rep. Act No. 6426 (1972), as amended
7. Rep. Act No. 9160 (2001), as amended
8. RULES OF COURT, Rule 113, Sec, 14
C. Cases
1. 1. "Miranda" rights
a) Miranda v. Arizona, 384 u.s. 436 (1966)
b) U.S. v. Wade, 388 U.S. 218 (1969)
c) Orozco v. Texas, 394 U.S. 324 (1969)
d) U.S. v. Brown, 990 F.2d 397 (1993)
e) People v. Andan, 269 SCRA 95 (1997)
f) People v. Endino, 352 SCRA 307 (2001)
g) People v. Caguioa, 95 SCRA (1980)
h) People v. Maqueda, 242 SCRA 656 (1995)
i) People v. Amestuzo, 361 SCRA 184 (2001)
j) People v. Obrero, 332 SCRA 190 (2000)
k) Jesalva v. People, 640 SCRA 253 (2011)
2. 2. Exclusionary rule/ "Fruit of the poisonous tree"
doctrine
a) Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961)
b) People v. Alicando, 251 SCRA 293 (1995)
c) People v. Januarlo, 267 SCRA 608 (1997)
 d) People v. SamontañeZ, 346 SCRA 837 (2000)
e) People v. MojeIlo, 425 SCRA 11 (2004)
f) Ho Wal Pang v. People, 659 SCRA 624 (2011)
3. 3. Surveillance/ Recording of communications
a) Gaanan v. IAC, 145 SCRA 112 (1986)
b) Katz v. U. S., 389 U.S. 347 (1967)
c) U.S. v. White, 401 U S. 745 (1971)
d) J.S. v. Knotts, 460US 276 (1983)
e) Spouses Hing v. Choachuy, 699 SCRA 667 (2013)
IV. IV. SEARCH & SEIZURE Rule 126
A. C0NST., Art. III, Secs. 2 and 3
B. Statutes/Rules
1. REV. PEN. CODE, Arts. 129-130
2. TARIFF AND CUSTOMS CODE, Secs. 2201-2212, 2301-
2304
3. Rep. Act No. 6235 (1971), Sec. 9
C. Cases
1. Generally
a) Stonehill v. Diokno, 20 SCRA 383 (1967)
b) Burgos v Chief of Staff, 133 SCRA 800 (1984)
c) People v. Marti, 193 SCRA 57 (1991)
d) People v Bongcarawan, 384 SCRA 525 (2002)
e) U.S. v. Place, 462 U.S. 696 (1983)
2. Procedure for issuance of a search warrant
a) Pendon v. CA, 191 SCRA 429 (1990)
b) Silva v. Hon. Presiding Judge of RTC Negros Oriental,
203 SCRA 140 (1991)
c) People v. Mamaril, 420 SCRA 662 (2004)
d) Malaloan v. CA, 232 SCRA 249 (1994)
e) Groh v. Ramirez, 540 U.S. 551 (2004)
f) Paper Industries Corp. v. Asuncion, 307 SCRA 687
(1984)
g) People v. Dichoso, 223 SCRA 174 (1993)
h) People v. Salanguit, 356 SCRA 683 (2001)
i) Kho v. Macalintal, 307 SCRA 70 (1999)
j) Worldwide Web Corporation v. People, 713 SCRA 18
 (2014)
3. Warrantless searches
a) Moving vehicles
(1) Carroll v.U.S.,267U.S 132 (1925)
(2) People v. Que, 265 SCRA 721 (1996)
(3) Cabafles v. CA, 373 SCRA 221 (2002)
(4) U.S. v. Chadwick, 433 U.S. 11977)
(5) People v. Mariacos, 621 SCRA 327 (2010)
b) Plain view
(1) U.S. v. Gray, 484 F2d 352 (6 ° ' Cii., 1978)
(2) Arizona v. Hicks, 480 U.S. 321 (1987)
(3) Horton v. California, 496 U.S. 128 (1990)
(4) People v. Musa, 217 SCRA 597 (1993)
(5) People v. Doria, 301 SCRA 668 (1999)
(6) Valeroso v. CA, 598 SCRA 41 (2009)
(7) Miclat, Jr. v. People, 656 SCRA 539 (2011)
c) Waiver or consented searches
(1) Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412 U.S. 218 (1973)
(2) U.S. v. Matlock, 415 U.S. 164 (1974)
(3) Bumper v. North Carolina, 391 U.S. 543 (1968)
d) Stop and frisk
(1) Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. i (1968)
(2) Minnesota v. Dickerson, 508 U.S. 366 (1993)
(3) People v. Solayao, 262 SCRA 255 (1996)
(4) People v. Sy Chua, 396 SCRA 657 (2003)
(5) Romines v. People, 629 SCRA 370 (2010)
(6) People v. Cogaed, 731 SCRA 427 (2014)
e) Search incidental to a lawful arrest
(1) Chime v. California, 395 U.S 752 (1969)
(2) New York v. Belton, 453 U.S. 454 (1981)
(3) People v. Chua Ho San, 308 SCRA 432 (1999)
(4) Cadua v. CA, 312 SCRA 703 (1999)
(5) Padilla v. CA, 269 SCRA 402 (1997)
(6) People v. Martinez, 637 SCRA 791 (2010)
 (7) Knowles v. Iowa, 525 U.S. 113 (1998)
(8) People v. Delos Reyes, 656 SCRA 417 (2011)
(9) People v. Dimalanta, 727 SCRA 20 (2014)
f) Exigent and emergency circumstances
(1) People v. De Gracia, 233 SCRA 716 (1994)
(2) People v. Ayangao, 427 SCRA 428 (2004)
g) Hot pursuit
(1) People v. De Lara, 236 SCRA 291 (1994)
h) Customs searches
(1) Boac, et at. v. People of the Philippines, 570 SCRA
533 (2008)
(2) Bureau of Customs, et al. v. Ogarlo, et al., 329
SCRA 289 (2000)
V. V. ARREST - Rules 113 and 112, Secs. 5, 6 1 7 and 9(b)
A. CONST., Art. Ill, Secs. I and 2
B. Statutes/Rules
1. Rep. Act No. 7438 (1992)
2. Rep. Act No. 9344 (2006), Secs. 20-21
3. Batas Pamb. Blg.129 (1980), Sec. 37, pars. 2 & 3
4. REV. PEN, CODE, Art. 269
5. REV. RULE ON SUMMARY PROCEDURE, Sec. 16
6. A.M. No. 02-1-06-SC dated 22 January 2002
7. SC Admin. Circ. No. 13 dated 12 October 1985
8. DOJ Circular No. 50 dated 29 October 1990
C. Cases
1. Generally
a) Chance v. State, 202 So.2d 825 (Fla. 1967)
b) Sanchez v. Demetriou, 227 SCRA 627 (1993)
2. Procedure for issuance of a warrant of arrest
a) Allado v. Diokno, 232 SCRA 192 (1994)
b) Pangamdaman v. Casar, 159 SCRA 599 (1988)
c) Gutierrez v. Hernandez, 524 SCRA 1 (2007)
d) AAA v. Carbonell, 524 SCRA 496 (2007)
3. Warrantless arrests
a) In flagrante delicto
 (1) People v. Montilla, 285 SCRA 703 (1998)
(2) People v. Aminnudin, 163 SCRA 402 (1988)
(3) People v. Molina, 352 SCRA 174 (2001)
(4) Alih v. Castro, 151 SCRA 279 (1987)
(5) People v. Alunday, 564 SCRA 135 (2008)
(6) People v. Ng YAk Bun, 639 SCRA 88 (2011)
(7) People v. Araneta 634 SCRA 475 (2010)
b) When an offense has just been committed
(1) Posadas V. Ombudsman, 341 SCRA 380 (2000)
(2) People v. Escordial, 373 SCRA 585 (2002)
(3) People v. Mengote, 210 SCRA 174 (1992)
(4) Pestilos v. Generoso, 739 SCRA 336 (2014)
c) Escapee
VI. VI. PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION - Rule 112
A. Statutes/Rules
1. Batas Pamb 81g. 129, Sec. 37
2. A.M. No. 05-8-26-SC dated 30 August 2005
3. REV. RULE ON SUMMARY PROCEDURE, Sec. 11
4. Rep. Act No. 6770 (1989), as amended
5. Ombudsman Administrative Order No. 07 dated 10 April
1990
6. Rep. Act No. 9344 (2006), Secs. 32-33
7. Distinguish from: DOJ Circular No. 61 dated 21
September 1993
8. DOJ Circular No. 70 dated 3 July 2000
9. DOJ Circular No. 70-A dated 10 July 2000
10. DOJ Circular No. 18 dated 8 March 2017
B. Cases
1. Crespo v. Mogul, 151 SCRA 462 (1987)
2. Roberts v. CA, 254 SCRA 307 (1996)
3. Fuentes v. Sandiganbayafl, 495 SCRA 784 (2006)
4. Villaflor v. Vivar, 349 SCRA 194 (2001)
5. Uy v. Sandiganbayafl, 354 SCRA 651 (2001)
6. Sales v. Sandiganbayafl, 369 SCRA 293 (2001)
7. Hegerty v. CA, 409 SCRA 285 (2003)
 8. Ocampo v. Obando, 715 SCRA 673 (2014)
9. Estrada v. Ombudsman, 748 SCRA 2 (2015)
VII. VII. VENUE - Rule 110, Sec. 15
A. C0NST., Art. Vlll, Sec. 5(4)
B. Statutes
1. Batas Pamb. Big. 129, Sec. 18
2. Pres. Decree No. 1069 (1977)
C. Cases
1. Lopez v. City Judge, 18 SCRA 616 (1977)
2. People v Grospe, 157 SCRA 154 (1988)
3. Gamboa et al. v. CA, 68 SCRA 308 (1975)
4. Ibasco v. CA, 261 SCRA 449 (1996)
5. Isip v. People, 525 SCRA 735 (2007)
6. Union Bank vs. People, G.R. No. 192565, 28 February
2012, 667 SCRA 113*
7. Navaja vs. de Castro, G.R. No. 182926, 22 June 2015
8. Sto. Tomas vs. Salac, 685 SCRA 245
9. Yalong vs. People, 704 SCRA 195
VIII. VIII. COMPLAINT AND INFORMATION - Rule 110
A. Complaint/Information
1. Definition
a) Ampatuan Jr. vs. De Lima, G.R. No. 197291, April 3,
2013
b) Oporto Jr. vs. Monserate, A.M. No. MTJ-96-1109, April
16, 2001
c) Salazar vs. People, G.R. No. 149472, 15 October 2002
d) People vs. Arrojado, G.R. No. 207041, 09 November
2015
2. Sufficiency
a) People vs. Sandiganbayan (Fourth), G.R. No. 160619,
09 September 2015
b) Zapata vs. People, G.R. No. 170863, 20 March 2013,
694 SCRA 25
3. Duplicity
a) People vs. Jugueta, G.R. No. 202124, 05 April 2016
b) Loney vs. People, G.R. No. 152644, 10 February 2006,
482 SCRA 194
B. With whom, by whom, and against whom, filed
1. 1. Statutes/Rules
a) REV. PEN. CODE, Art. 91
b) A.M. No. 00-1 1-01-sc dated 25 March 2003
2. 2. Cases
a) a. Del Rosario v. Vda. de Mercado, 29 SCRA 116 (1969)
b) b. Francisco v. People, 579 SCRA 698 (2009)
C. By whom prosecuted
1. 1. Statutes/Rules
a) A.M. No. 02-2-07-SC dated 10 April 2002
b) REV. PEN. CODE, Arts. 344 and 360, last par.
c) Rep. Act No. 8353 (1997)
2. 2. Cases
a) Bagatua v. Revilla, 104 Phil. 392 (1958)
b) Bernabe v. Bolinas, 18 SCRA 812 (1966)
c) People v. Liggayu, 97 Phil. 865 (1955)
d) Sta. Rosa Mining Co. V. Zabala, 153 SCRA 362 (1987)
e) Crespo v. Mogul, 151 SCRA 462 (1987)
f) Tan v Gallardo, 73 SCRA 30 (1976)
D. Form and constituent allegations - Relate to Rule 116, Sec. 9
1. Statute/Rule
a) REV. PEN. CODE, Arts. 48 and 294
2. Name of the Accused
a) People vs. Bali-Balita, G.R. No. 134266, 15 September
2000, 340 SCRA 450
3. Designation of Offense
a) People vs. Valdez, G.R. No. 175602, January 18, 2012
b) People vs. Asilan, G.R. No. 188322, April 11, 2012
c) People vs. Bayabos, G.R. Nos. 171222 and 174756, 18
February 2015
4. Cause of Accusation
a) People vs. Sandiganbayan (Fourth), Supra.
b) Dungo vs. People, G.R. No. 209464, 01 July 2015
5. Place of Commission
a) Navaja vs. De Castro, G.R. No. 182926, 22 June 2015
 6. Name of Offended Party
a) Lee Pue Liong vs. Chua Pue Chin Lee, G.R. No. 181658,
07August 2013
b) Senador vs. People, G.R. No. 201620, 06 March 2013
7. Additional Cases
a) U.S. v. Lim San, 17 Phil. 273 (1910)
b) U S.v. Starks, 6F.R D 43(S.N.Y. 1946)
c) People v. Teves, 310 SCRA 788 (1999)
d) U S. v. Chan Toco, 12 Phil. 262 (1908)
e) U S. v. Dichao, 27 Phil. 421 (1914)
f) U S. v. Stollings, 128 W.Va. 483, 37 SE 2nd 98 (1946)
g) Gaflego V. Sandtganbayan, 115 SCRA 793 (1982)
h) People V. Yap, 22 SCRA 853 (1968)
i) U.S. v. Lahoylahoy, 38 Phil. 330 (1918)
j) People v. Verzosa, 294 SCRA 466 (1998)
E. Amendment - Relate to Rule 120, Sec. 4; Rule 117, Sec. 7;
Rule 119, Sec. 19
1. 1. Cases
a) Arevalo v. Nepomuceno, 63 Phil. 627 (1936)
b) People v. Casey, 103 SCRA 21 (1981)
c) Buhat v. CA, 265 SCRA 701 (1996)
d) Fronda-Baggao v. People, 539 SCRA 531 (2007)
e) Balindong vs. CA, G.R. Nos. 177600 and 178684, 19
October 2015
f) Mendez vs. People, G.R. No. 179962, 11 June 2014
g) Ocampo vs. Abando, G.R. Nos. 176830, 185587, etc., 11
February 2014
h) Kummer vs. People, G.R. No. 174461, 11 September
2013, 705 SCRA 490
F. Additional Cases
1. Institution of Criminal Action
a) BPI vs. Hontanosas, Jr., G.R. No. 157163, 25 June 2014
b) Heirs of Delgado vs. Gonzalez, G.R. No. 184337, 07
August 2009, 595 SCRA 501
c) Lim vs. Mejica, A.C. No. 11121, 13 September 2016
2. Prescription of Criminal Action
 a) Zaldivia vs. Reyes, Jr., 211 SCRA 277
b) People vs. Pangilinan, 672 SCRA 105
c) Arambulo vs. Laqui, Sr., 342 SCRA 740
3. Prosecution of Criminal Action
a) Worldwide Web Corp. vs. People, G.R. Nos. 161106 &
161266, 13 January 2013,
b) Busuego vs. Office of the Ombudsman, G.R. No.
196842, 09 October 2013
c) La. Jimenez vs. Sorongon, G.R. No. 178607, 05
December 2012 (representation by OSG; exceptions)
d) Chua vs. Padillo, 522 SCRA 60
e) Pinote vs. Ayco, 477 SCRA 409
f) Pilapil vs. Ibay-Somera, 174 SCRA 653
g) People vs. Piccio, G.R. No. 193681, 06 August 2014
4. Duplicity of Offense
a) People vs. Jugueta, G.R. No. 202124, 05 April 2016
b) Loney vs. People, G.R. No. 152644, 10 February 2006,
482 SCRA 194
c) People vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 183652, 25
February 2015
5. People vs. Feliciano, G.R. No. 196735, 05 May 2014
6. People vs. Begino, 582 SCRA 189
7. People vs. Lucena, G.R. No. 190632, 26 February 2014
8. People vs. Tuando, 785 SCRA 103
IX. IX. THE CIVIL ASPECT - Rule 111
A. Prosecution of civil action - Relate to Rule 110, Sec. 16
1. Statutes/Rules
a) CIVIL CODE, Arts. 29t036
b) Supreme Court Circular No. 57-97 dated 16
September 1997
c) OCA Circular No. 70-97 dated 21 October 1997
d) Sec. 21(a), A.M. No. 04-2-04-SC, August 16, 2004
(Revision of Rile 141, Revised Rules of Court Legal
Fees)
2. Cases
a) Civil action for civil liability ex de/icto
(1) U.S. v. Heery, 25 Phil. 600 (1913)
 (2) Yakult v. CA, 190 SCRA 357 (1990)
(3) Rafael Reyes Trucking Corp. v. People, 329 SCRA
600 (2000)
(4) RodrigueZ v. Ponferrada, 465 SCRA 338 (2005)
(5) Chiok vs. People, G.R. No. 179814 and 180021, 07
December 2015
(6) Bernardo vs. People, G.R. No. 182210, 05 October
2015
(7) Standard Insurance Co., Inc. vs. Cuaresma, G.R.
No. 200055, 10 September 2014
(8) Heirs of Simon vs. Chan, G.R. No. 157547, 23
February 2011
(9) Heirs of Burgos vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No.
169711, 08 February 2010
b) Prejudicial question
(1) Rojas v. People, 57 SCRA 243 (1974)
(2) Jimenez v. Averia, 22 SCRA 1380 (1968)
(3) Ras v. Rasul, 100 SCRA 125 (1980)
(4) People v. Consing, 395 SCRA 366 (2003)
(5) Ark Travel Express, Inc. v. Abrogar, 410 SCRA
148
(6) People v. Delizo, 436 SCRA 615 (2004)
(7) Ty-de Zuzuarregui vs. Villarosa, et al., G.R. No.
183788, 05 April 2010
(8) People vs. Arambulo, Jr., G.R. No. 186597, 17
June 2015
(9) San Miguel Properties, Inc. v. Perez, G.R. No.
166836, 04 September 2013
(10) Spouses Gabitano vs. San Miguel Corp., G.R. No.
188767, 24 July 2013
(11) Pimentel vs. Pimentel, G.R. No. 172060, 13
September 2010
(12) Dreamwork Construction, Inc. vs. Janiola, G.R.
No. 184861, 30 June 2009
B. When Separate Civil Action is suspended
1. Co vs. Muñoz, Jr., G.R. No. 181986, 04 December 2013
2. Domingo vs. Colina, G.R. No. 173330, 17 June 2013
3. Ching vs. Nicdao, G.R. No. 141181, 27 April 2007
C. When Civil Action may proceed independently
 1. Lim vs. Kou Co Ping, G.R. No. 175256 and 179160 August
2012
2. Casupanan vs. Laroya, G.R. No. 145391, 26 August 2002
3. Cabuago vs. People, G.R. Nos. 163879 and 165805, 30 July
2014
D. Effect of Death on Civil Action
1. People vs. Lipata, G.R. No. 200302, 20 April 2016
2. Cabugao vs. People, Supra.
3. Asilo, Jr. vs. People, G.R. Nos. 159017-18 and 159059, 09
March 2011
4. People vs. Bayot, G.R. No. 200030, 18 April 2012
E. Judgment in Civil Action
1. Madarang vs. CA, G.R. No. 143044, 14 July 2005
F. Provisional remedies
1. Rule 127
2. Rep. Act No. 9262 (2004), Sec. 22
G. Other Cases
1. Cabaero vs. Cantos, 271 SCRA 391
2. Maccay vs. Nobela, 454 SCRA 504
3. Hyatt Industrial Manufacturing vs. Asia Dynamic
Electrix, 465 SCRA 454
4. Romero vs. People, 593 SCRA 202
5. People vs. Bayotas, 236 SCRA 239
6. Trinidad vs. Office of the Ombudsman, 539 SCRA 415
7. Yu vs. Philippine Commercial International Bank, 485
SCRA 56
8. Abacan, Jr. vs. Northwestern University, 455 SCRA 136
9. San Miguel Properties vs. Perez, 705 SCRA 38*
10. Te s. CA, 346 SCRA 327
11. People vs. Lipata, G.R. No. 200302, 20 April 2016*
X. BAIL - Rule 114
A. CONST., Art. III, Sec. 13
B. Statutes/Rules
1. Administrative Circular No. 2-92 dated 20 January 1992
2. A.M. No. 05-8-26-SC dated 30 August 2005
3. Rep. Act No. 6036 (1969)
 4. Rep. Act No. 9344 (2006), Secs. 34-36
C. Cases
1. Stack v. Boyle, 342 U S. 1(1951)
2. Yap, Jr. v. Court of Appeals, 358 SCRA 564 (2001)
3. Manotoc, Jr. v. CA, 142 SCRA 149 (1986)
4. Esteban v. Alhambra, 437 SCRA 560 (2004)
5. Taborite v. Sollesta, 408 SCRA 602 (2003)
6. Seraplo v. Sandiganbayan, 396 SCRA 443 (2003)
7. Chua v. CA, 520 SCRA 729 (2007)
8. Leviste v. CA, 615 SCRA 619 (2010)
XI. ARRAIGNMENT AND PLEA - Rule 116
A. Cases
1. U.S, v. Santiago, 35 Phil. 20 (1916)
2. People v. Chua, 366 SCRA 283 (2001)
3. People v. Durango, 329 SCRA 758 (2000)
4. People v. Magat, 332 SCRA 517 (2000)
5. People v. Madraga, 344 SCRA 628 (2000)
6. People v. Bello, 316 SCRA 804 (1999)
7. People v. Baharan, 639 SCRA 157 (2011)
XII. QUASHAL - Rule 117
A. CONST., Art. Ill, Sec. 21
B. Cases
1. 1. Generally
a) Lopez v. City Judge, 18 SCRA 616 (1966)
b) People v. Nitafan, 302 SCRA 424 (1999)
c) People v. Cadabis, 97 Phil. 829 (1955)
d) People v. dela Rosa, 98 SCRA 190 (1980)
2. Double jeopardy
a) U.S. v. Jenkins, 490 F.2d 868 (1973)
b) U.S. v. Scott, 437 U.S. 829 98 S.Ct. 2187, 57 L.Ed.2d 65
(1978)
c) Lockhart v. Nelson, 488 U.S. 33, 109 S.Ct. 285, 102
L.Ed.2d 265 (1988)
d) Cudia v. Court of Appeals, 284 SCRA 173 (1998)
e) People v. Alvarez, 45 Phil. 472 (1923)
 f) People v. Relova, 148 SCRA 292 (1987)
g) People v. del Carmen, 88 Phil. 51 (1951)
h) People v Gloria, 80 SCRA 675 (1977)
i) Esmeña v. Pogoy, 102 SCRA 861 (1981)
j) People v. AdD, 76 SCRA 462 (1977)
k) People v. Velasco, 340 SCRA 207 (2000)
l) People v. Obsania, 23 SCRA 1249 (1968)
m) Green v. U.S., 355 U S. 184 9 78 S.Ct. 221, 2 L.Ed.2d
199 (1957)
n) Ashe v. Swenson, 397 U.S. 436 1 90 S.Ct. 1189 1 25
LEd.2d 469 (1970)
o) Alonto v. People, 445 SCRA 624 (2004)
p) Castro v. People, 559 SCRA 676 (2008)
q) Cerezo v. People, 650 SCRA 222 (2011)
XIII. PRELIMINARY CONFERENCE AND PRE-TRIAL - Rule 118
A. Statutes/Rules
1. REV. RULE ON SUMMARY PROCEDURE (1991), Sec. 14
2. Administrative Circular No. 03-1-09-SC dated 13 July
2004, I. Be Criminal Cases
3. Rep. Act No. 8493 (1998), Secs. 2-5; Supreme Court
Circular No. 38-98-SC dated 11 August 1998
4. A.M. No. 03-1-09-SC dated 13 July 2004
B. Cases
1. Bayas v. Sandiganbayan, 391 SCRA 415 (2002)
2. People v. Sitao, 387 SCRA 701 (2002)
XIV. TRIAL Rule 119; Rule 116, Secs. 9 and 11; Rule 115
A. CONST., Art. III, Secs. 12, 14, 16 and 17
B. Statutes/Rules
1. REV, RULE ON SUMMARY PROCEDURE (1991), Secs. 14,
18-20
2. Rep. Act No. 8493 (1998), Secs. 6-14
3. Supreme Court Circular No. 38-98-SC dated 11 August
1998
4. Rep. Act No. 6981 (1991)
5. Pres. Decree No 749 (1975)
6. Rep. Act No. 4908 (1968)
 7. Rep. Act No. 6033 (1969)
C. Cases
1. Miranda v. Arizona, 384 u.s. 436 (1966)
2. People v. Santocildes, Jr., 321 SCRA 310 (1999)
3. Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 (1972)
4. Jones v. Superior Court, 58 CaI.2d 56, 372 P.2d 919 (1982)
5. People v. Mendiola, 82 Phil. 743 (1949)
6. Flores v. Sandiganbayafl, 124 SCRA 109 (1983)
7. People v. Feliciano, 367 SCRA 53 (2001)
8. Chua v. Court of Appeals, 261 SCRA 112 (1996)
9. Webb v. De Leon, 247 SCRA 652 (1995)
10. U.S. v. Catimbang, 35 Phil. 367 (1916)
11. Bermudez V. Castillo, 64 Phil. 483 (1937)
12. People v. Mamacot, 81 Phil. 543 (1948)
13. Abriol v. Homeres, 84 Phil. 525 (1949)
14. Griffin v. California, 380 U.S. 609 (1965)
15. Ty-Dazo v. San diganbayan, 374 SCRA 200 (2002)
XV. JUDGMENT - Rule 120
A. CONST., Art, VIII, Sec. 14
B. Statutes/Rules
1. REV. RULE ON SUMMARY PROCEDURE (1991), Sec. 14
2. Pres. Decree No. 968 (1976), as amended
3. Rep. Act, No. 9344 (2006), Sec 38-56
4. Administrative Circular No. 7-A-92 dated 21 June 1993
C. Cases
1. People v. Tamayo, 86 Phil. 209 (1950)
2. People v. Romero, 89 Phil. 672 (1951)
3. Ramos v. Gonong, 72 SCRA 559 (1976)
4. People v. Jalandoni, 131 SCRA 454 (1984)
5. Cea v. Paguio, 397 SCRA 494 (2003)
6. People v. Trestiza, 660 SCRA 407 (2011)
XVI. NEW TRIAL OR RECONSIDERATION - Rule 121
A. Statute/Rule
1. REVISED RULES ON SUMMARY PROCEDURE (1991), Sec.
19(c)
 B. Cases
1. Jose v. CA, 70 SCRA 257 (1976)
2. People v. Astudiflo, 401 SCRA 723 (2003)
3. Suliman v. People, 741 SCRA 477 (2014)
XVII. APPEAL - Rules 122,124 and 125
A. Statutes/Rules
1. REVISED RULES ON SUMMARY PROCEDURE (1991), Sec.
21
2. A.M. No. 00-5-03-SC dated 28 September 2004
B. Cases
1. Quemuel v. CA, 22 SCRA 44 (1968)
2. People v. Gomez, 20 SCRA 293 (1967)
3. People v. Ursua, 60 Phil. 252 (1934)
4. Martinez v. CA, 237 SCRA 575 (1994)
5. People v. Bayotas, 236 SCRA 239 (1994)
6. People v Esparas, 260 SCRA 539 (1996)
7. Tamayo v. CA, 423 SCRA 175 (2004)
8. Vitto v. CA, 404 SCRA 307 (2003)
9. Villena v. People, 641 SCRA 127 (2011)
10. Yu v. Tatad, 642 SCRA 421 (2011)
11. Geroche v. People, 742 SCRA 514 (2014)
XVIII. POST-CONVICTION REVIEW
A. Cases
1. Abriol v. Homeres, 84 Phil. 525 (1949)
2. Cruz v. Director of Prisons, 17 Phil. 269 (1910)
3. Parulan v. Director of Prisons, 22 SCRA 638 (1968)
4. Galman v. Sandiganbayan 144 SCRA 43 (1986) 5:
5. People V. Labiaga 250 SCRA 163 (1995)
6. Lejano v. People, 638 SCRA 104 (2010)