Advanced E-Book content

Introduction...........................................................................................................................................................................3
Chapter One...........................................................................................................................................................................5
Part 1: Pre-flop play..........................................................................................................................................................5
Limping strategy..........................................................................................................................................................5
Limping hands..............................................................................................................................................................5
Exploitative play..........................................................................................................................................................6
Ranges by position.......................................................................................................................................................7
Button...........................................................................................................................................................................7
Small Blind..................................................................................................................................................................8
3-betting from the small blind....................................................................................................................................10
Big Blind....................................................................................................................................................................11
Calling all-ins.............................................................................................................................................................12
Chapter Two........................................................................................................................................................................12
Part 1: Post flop play.......................................................................................................................................................12
3-barreling..................................................................................................................................................................15
Calling river bets........................................................................................................................................................15
Chapter Three......................................................................................................................................................................17
Extra content...................................................................................................................................................................17
The multiplier effect...................................................................................................................................................17
Mental game...............................................................................................................................................................17
The ultimate Spin and Go Chart.....................................................................................................................................18
FAQ.....................................................................................................................................................................................18
What is cEV?.............................................................................................................................................................18
How many hands/games do I need before I can estimate my cEV?..........................................................................19
How much +cEV is a good winrate at the micro's?...................................................................................................19
How big are the swings?............................................................................................................................................19
What is the best way to make money at the micro's quickly?....................................................................................19
Introduction
It may come as no surprise to you to hear that Spin and Go's are growing to be extremely
popular. Right from the start the jackpot format attracted an unbelievable number of
recreational players. In the first 10 days of the launch, over 7 million Spin and Go's where
played at Pokerstars. And despite the amount of some good grinders that made the switch
to Spins, the games are probably the softest format to be found in online poker today.

And that is part of the reason why I got so obsessed with Spin and Go's. For the first time
I felt there was not only a format I could really understand well, but also crush hard, and
prepare a solid strategy for. I would spend hours and hours in a row going over simple
calculations just to make sure I would get things right. It actually felt like pieces of a
puzzle were coming together the further I progressed in trying so solve Spin and Go
poker. Now I don't live in the illusion I have actually solved the game, but I am confident
in saying I did construct a strategy capable of crushing the lower stakes of Spin and Go's.
And this is just the start.

Ironically enough this moment arrived after nearly 12 years in my poker carreer, most of
which was spent grinding Multi Table Tournaments. I've always felt I was a very capable
player in those, and I was definitely winning, but I never felt I was capable of moving up
to the highest stakes. I took most of my confidence out of my results of being a consistent
winner at the lower and medium stakes but I knew I had to become a better poker player.
With the arrival of Spin and Go poker I was basically handed the opportunity to do so and
I've never felt better about my game.

Now I am sure many of you can relate to a big part of this story. There are so many
players out there that are unquestionably winning at poker, yet never make that next step.
This can be for many reasons. The fear of the losses that will come with moving up, the
fear of looking stupid at the higher stakes, the lack of work ethic to improve, different
priorities, a wrong mentality towards studying, or – to name just a few.

In this book the focus is on giving you the right tools to start thinking at a different level.
This is not by any means the most advanced poker book out there, but that was never the
intention. If you are currently playing at the micro and lower stakes but feel like there is
more potential in you, or you just really dream of improving as a poker player then this
one is for you. The feeling of growth is one of the best feelings there is, so hopefully this
book can stimulate that in your poker life. If you still have any questions after reading this
you can always reach out trough the same website you got this book from (probably
www.spinandgocharts.com). For now the best of luck, and enjoy!

- SpinandGoCharts.com team
Chapter One
Part 1: Pre-flop play
In Spins pre-flop play takes some getting used to since it's so different from other formats.
Starting out with 25BB there's not much room for error and a solid pre-flop strategy
should be addopted. Since it is 3-handed it is tempting to try and start of very aggressive,
but especially against more fishy opponents this is definitely suicide. Different players do
have success with different styles of play, where some like to use a strategy that includes a
lot of limping, while others prefer to start of more tight. Let's look at a bit closer at both
strategies:

Limping strategy

As a general rule more fishy opponents contest far less for unraised pots, and your cbet
succes rate will increase a lot. Especially HU on boards with single highcards such as
Ac8s4s, two highcards such as AcQs4s, and paired boards such as JsJc4c you should be
betting close to 100%.

And while it is a commonly accepted belief that it is nearly impossible to work out
opponents ranges in limped pots, this is not exactly true. 'Check behind' ranges are often
fairly obvious ones as clearly no opponent will ever check behind with too strong of a
holding. Therefore while the flops mentioned above are great examples of flops where
you could pick up an uncontested pot, there are numerous examples where you should be
checking behind on the flop.

A downside to the limping strategy, especially when being used from the BTN, is that you
will be playing a 3-way pot very often. While you're obviously playing against 2 weaker
ranges, playing multiway and trying to pick up simple pots can become tricky. Still, in a
3-way pot on the flops mentioned before, our cbet % (and success rate) should be very
high.

General tip:

Before the first hand is dealt, use the 'find player' option to see in how many
games your opponents are registered. If an opponent is only playing 1 game,
you can already mark him as a recreational player and adjust accordingly.
Limping hands

Finding a range for limping in Spin and Go's is something that can be a bit more difficult
than it seems. A common mistake being made amongst people starting out with the format
is to raise their top x% of hands, and limp with the more weaker holdings that can
potentially flop a monster. Examples of those hands would be 74s-76s, 53s-65s, 95s-96s,
etc. The biggest argument against this is that you will be in a lot of pots with very weak
hands, and you will be purely bluffing a very high % of the time, or have a very weak pair
that will be extremely difficult to play even in a limped pot.

When moving up to the higher formats it can definitely pay to adopt a very strong limping
range with broadway holdings such as QJ/KJ, and other stronger hands including KT, QT,
and JT. But at the micro formats raising with those hands definitely holds a higher
expectancy than limping. This is due to many reasons.

First of all opponents will be 3-betting at a much lower frequency than at the higher
stakes, where most opponents understand they should be going allin over your open a
certain amount of times. This makes for your fold equity to go up in general, making it
more profitable to open raise more hands.

Second, opponents will be making far more mistakes postflop at the lower stakes. This
makes it far more profitable to be in raised pots with strong broadway holdings.
Opponents are far more likely to overplay and overvalue their hands. Maybe they have
seen good players defend with K3s type hands, and have addopted it in their games. This
will be cause for a lot of problems for them postflop, which is something we need to
exploit.

And the list goes on. But, even at the lower stakes it is important to not have ranges that
are too solid. There are many types of fishes in the sea, and all of them require a different
approach. So while it will usually be a good idea to start out by raising a certain range,
after just 10 hands into the game those hands may already be clear limps.

And there is no way to deny limping those types of hands from the start is a +EV decision
but in the end in poker we will always be looking at the play that has the highest
expectancy. At the micro limits ($1-$3 Spins) players both tend to defend with ranges that
are far too weak and will be making a ton of mistakes post flop that you will be able to
exploit. Far more than none you will see players stack of with middle pair or a very weak
top pair and even in limped pots, and you will be able to stack them.

As we pointed out earlier we should have a very high c-betting % in limped pots as we
will be able to pick those up uncontested at a very high frequency. At the higher limits
opponents will be aware of this and will start to play back more often. Because of this you
want to protect your limping range as well by including holdings that give you the
opportunity to play back against agression from the blinds both pre- as well as post-flop.

With your low suited connectors that you're likely to have in your limping range right now
you won't be too happy calling an isolation raise from a solid regular from the BB, who
will quickly pick up on your high limp-folding % and start to exploit your tendencies.

Exploitative play

The higher you will move up, the more you will have to start thinking about balancing out
all parts of all your ranges. A common mistake many players are making is trying to play
balanced or unexploitable at the micro's. But playing a fixed 'set-in-stone' style of play
because you believe is best because of 'GTO' or being 'unexploitable' you are actually
losing out on tons of EV against the many weaker opponents you will encounter.

What it comes down to at the micro's is identifying the fish as soon as possible in the
game, and exploiting them no matter what as soon as possible. This could mean
minraising your AA from the BTN with a 6BB stack against someone with a close to 100
VPIP, or raising your TPWK on the flop in a spot where you'd normally go in 'call-down
mode'.

It is important to not try and auto-pilot trough the micro's with a fixed style, but rather try
and pick off the tons of fish you will be playing against all day long.

General tip:

Trying to play an unexploitable style of poker against people that will never
exploit you in a million years is burning money.

Ranges by position

In a 3-handed format general ranges will obviously get much wider than what you will be
used to from other formats of poker (except for HU of course). Let's take a look at all
positions and start constructing some basic ranges that could help you get on your way.

Button

Obviously the position from which you will have the highest VPIP % and be winning the
most chips. Yet a common mistake is raising too wide and playing too many hands. An
ideal opening range should be around 45% of all hands, mostly consisting of the absolute
top of all holdings.

While we will be taking out a couple of limping hands that would normally fit in the top
of all general holdings (say Q7s-Q9s, K8-K7s) and adding a few from the bottom of all
general holdings (say 54s-53s, Q5s-Q4s), generally speaking we will raise the top 45% of
all hands and limp around 5-7% of all hands.
When you're either getting used to the format or just not too comfortable or experienced
playing that many hands, we can go a bit tighter than the range above. You will have to be
very realistic with yourself and constantly check your tracker database (if available) for
hands and situations where you are actually losing chips. Your edge might be smaller than
expected which just means there is still some work left to do.

Also it is obviously very opponent dependent how to play, as even fish come in many
different ways. There is the obvious fish who plays far too many hands and plays fit or
fold post-flop, which means we can open up our button ranges far more and start c-betting
close to 100%. But against the overly aggro fish who for some reason is willing to stack
off with their Q9o pre-flop we can get away with a far tigher approach than the 45%
range, despite going trough the blinds so often. Even when playing against a whale the
most chips are simply won by paying close attention and making the right decisions over
and over again.

Small Blind

Probably the most difficult position to play from and therefore the one you will find
yourself losing the most chips overall. Our flatting ranges vs the BTN need to be fairly
tight here since we are not closing the action and the BB can get us in quite a few difficult
spots. Add to this the fact that we will be out of position the entire hand and it is obvious
why we lose the most chips in the SB.

As for being folded to we can obviously raise fairly wide against most players in the BB.
While some players over-adjust by starting to shove too wide, we can easily counter that
by limping (and cbetting a lot) more, and basically just leave ourselves with a raising
range that we are also willing to call all-ins with. Our default opening range could look
something like this (around 50%).
And our limping range should be fairly tight, like so: (some hands that are in both charts
can be limped + opened)

Of course there are opponents who will let us get away with opening far closer to 100% of
all hands and this is something we should pick up on quickly enough if we are paying
enough attention. A lot of chips are to be won in these spots against opponents who are
just sitting around being lost or waiting for a monster, which is just another example of
why we should never hang on too long to a 'set-in-stone' approach towards the game and
simply look for the best ways to exploit our opponents.
3-betting from the small blind

A topic many players struggle with is what hands to 3-bet from the blinds in Spin and
Go's. And while this is definitely a bit more of an advanced concept we would like to give
you some pointers to give you a general idea. Please keep in mind this is a very general
and basic approach to a advanced concept, especially since we are in the small blind and
we are still dealing with the Big Blind behind us. Let's take the following example:

Blind 10/20 – HERO is SB with 4s4c

BTN 500 – raises to 40

SB (HERO) 500 - ?
BB 500

Let's assume Villain is minraising 45% of hands on the BTN, and will call our 3-bet all-in
with a range of 22+ A6s+ Kjs+ A7o+ Kjo+. That means our shove with 44 will give us an
expectancy of +1.3BB (if you're not sure how we got to this, please feel free to shoot us a
message at www.spinandgocharts.com). At first this may not seem like too much, but if
you already have played Spin and Go's take a minute to look up how many chips you are
winning/losing from the SB with small pocket pairs.

General tip: to look up your chips won per position in PT4, go to View Stats > T >
Statistics in the top bar, then select By Position below.

In general you will be losing money trying to flat hands such as these, especially from the
Small Blind. Given that we have to do better than -0.5BB in expectancy, and we are losing
chips by flatting, shoving now obviously is the best option available to us.

And to give you more of a general guideline for a 3-betting range: assuming someone is
opening around 45% of their buttons and calling our shoving with a fairly tight range of
22+ A6s+ Kjs+ A7o+ KJo+, we can profitably 3-bet all-in 20BB with the following range
if we would be closing the action (from SB: tighten up this range according to the
tendencies of the BB).
Big Blind

The biggest difference between the BB and SB is that you will be closing the action from
the Big Blind, while getting better odds on a call than from the SB. From the BB we can
actually play quite agressively against the right opponents. With two limps before us we
should be shoving a fairly wide range at all stack depths, something that not enough
players are doing at the micros.

Another mistake you can exploit is the tendency from many players to minraise from the
SB, giving us odds that are too good to pass on. Basic poker theory will show us
minraising here is definitely a mistake and is something we want to avoid. Against a
minraise from the SB, you can defend very close to 100% from the BB.

General tip: against a SB who is minraising we can profitably defend close to 90%
of hands from the Big Blind.

As mentioned shoving over limps is a strategy not enough people are using at the micros
but it is something that can really add to our winrate. While some people will definitely
try and balance their limping ranges by adding a few monsters, in general limping ranges
are very unbalanced which is something we need to capitalize on.

Say a fairly loose-passive unknown limps on the BTN, the SB folds, and we are in the BB
with 20 Big Blinds effective. With 2.5BB in the middle up for grabs we are risking 20BB
to pick this up. Assuming our opponents will fold close to 90% of the time (before
adjusting if they pick up on our increased shoving frequencies), we can work out the
following:
Assuming we will move all-in with the following range: 22-JJ, Ajs-A7s, A5s-A2s, Kts+,
Q9s, J9s, T9s, 98s, A7o+ and our opponent occasionally traps with JJ+.

90% of the time we will pick up the 2.5 BB, which has an expectancy of +2.25BB
10% of the time we will get called and have around 26% equity, meaning we will lose
-3.75BB, but only 10% of the time (.1 x -.3.75) which is 0.375.

Which adds up to a total of +1.8BB for every time we move all-in over a limp from this
opponent. Now keep in mind these are some very basic calculations on a subject that is
quite a bit more complex, but the point is to show you how changing your game just a
little can increase your general winrate long-term.

Calling all-ins

In the Spin and Go format where we will start with 25BB, dealing with all-ins is obviously
a very big part of the game. We have created a cheatsheet to help you work out your
calling ranges. Please note that this is not a NASH chart, but these ranges are constructed
using the shoving ranges from the population at the micros. We have limited the sheet to
the 13 – 1 BB region, since most people at the micros have almost no shoving range over
13BB.

These ranges would be good starting point if you are facing a all-in in the BB for eample.
It is also important to experiment with this yourself and to constantly adjust according to
your opponents. If you feel you are getting it in behind far too often, that means the
population tendencies have shifted a bit and you should adjust as well. In the end winning
in poker comes from being able to adjust faster than your opponents.
Chapter Two
Part 1: Post flop play
While some people believe 25BB effective stacks don't leave too much room for post-flop
play, it is surprising how much room for error there still is at Spin and Go's post-flop.
Many opponents have tendencies that are easy to pick up one and that are easy to exploit.
The most common include c-betting too much or c-betting the wrong board structures, not
c-betting enough, playing fit or fold, and not having a plan for later streets. As mentioned
these are tendencies that are easy to pick up on and easy to exploit.

A simple spot in which you can increase your winrate a lot is finding the right structures
to c-bet on, against the right players. While most regulars are aware of the fact that your c-
betting frequencies will go up on certain 'obvious' boards (such as Axx and JJ4 f.e.), some
of them won't even bother playing back at you because they're unsure what to do at
effective stacksizes this shallow. Since floating usually does not feel like an option to
them, they decide to either jam or fold. We can easily adapt to this by bet-calling more
light and shutting down more against their c-bet calls.

Against recreational players you're basically printing money by c-betting a lot on paired
boards and dry boards with 1 high-card. They will usually have no clue how to play back
and when we do face agression we can safely fold. In limped pots your c-bet % should be
close to 100% on flops with 1 broadway card, paired boards, and dry unconnected boards.

To elaborate on the subject of c-betting we will use my post on the forums of one of the
Spin and Go study groups I've hosted to show the difference in c-betting frequencies and
ranges against different positions and calling ranges.

Q:

Hey there!
As we all know, we should be cbetting pretty often, does anyone have any information
what is the % of times we should be cbetting?
What to do you if you miss the flop and flop comes pretty drawy - lets say you got AK,
flop comes 467 rainbow - is this the kind of the structure you slow down on, you check
and if he checks the turn back to you, you do a late cbet?
A:

So no inspiration for any long posts just yet, but I'll be traveling a lot this week so who
knows I have time while waiting around etc.

My 2 cents for now: I believe this is so extremely gameflow and opponent dependent, that
it is hard to give you an answer. For example the board you just mentioned I would c-bet a
lot in general when I open BT and SB defends, because in general the SB defending range
consists mostly of broadways, midling Ax, and some top SC, so on a 7-high board he
generally has either 1 pair w/ TK or just 2 overs. So if you're looking to discuss AK
specifically: you could even get one street of value from worse high cards vs certain
opponents.
But in the same situation vs a BB defending range the story already becomes quite a bit
different. What's important here is to also be aware of villains 3-betting tendencies. If he's
3betting more of a polarized range, that means he won't be defending as many SC combo's
and he won't hit this flop mentioned as hard as some who's 3betting more linear. But
generally I believe it is a fairly safe assumption to say that a BB defending range hits this
board a lot harder than SB does, so vs SB I would c-bet a much higher % than vs BB.
SB vs BB dynamics are always a bit tricky, and I think on this particular board I would
lean towards checking. Coming back to the 3-betting part I've mentioned before: I tend to
c-bet more on Axx / Kxx/ Qxx (etc.) boards since not only are they scary for Villains: we
can also safely assume that in a Spin&Go enviroment where play is pretty much always
around 20bb, most strong A/K/Qx hands would have opted not to flat pre-flop (of course:
pay attention to the type of Villain you are playing here. The more passive, the more
likely they are to flat stronger hands, and in general they are not the right opponents to c-
bet too much against).
Also the % you should be c-betting is directly connected to the amount you're opening. So
if you're playing 20/10, you can c-bet close to 100% since your range for getting to flops
is so strong you're basically always betting for value. But the higher your opening % gets,
the more you have to be aware of you're c-betting tendencies. That is if opponents are
paying attention to this, and not just looking at their own 2 cards.
I remember reading about this in either a book or a 2+2 post. Upong searching I came
across this post on the forums: http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/170/live-low-stakes-
nl/cotm-c-betting-1550652/
And on a last note: No, I am not trying to balance my c-betting range in general. I just
try to look hand by hand what would be best. Vs certain opponents I just think about the
structure of the board and their range very briefly, but because of their style of play I
decide to c-bet close to 100% since they're playing so simple and they let you get away
with it. While certain opponents are just so loose and crazy, they won't even notice you
only c-bet for value and c/f all other parts of your range (or again: with the AK hand c/c
one street because they spaz vs checks).
Quote from 2+2 post in link:
"It is useful to look at the mathematical theory to further illustrate the relationship
between ranges and c-bet frequency. If you look within a theoretically balanced flop
betting range the ratio of bluffs to value bets will mostly fall between 3:1 and 1:1. The
math would show that essentially when the plan is to bet 3 streets (for value or as a triple
barrel bluff) the flop c-betting range can include more bluffs than when only planning to
bet flop and turn. If you consider those ratios you should see that in order to wind up on
the flop with a range that allows you to bet 70% of the time and where roughly one third
to one half of those bets are for value, you must have a pre-flop opening range that will
support it."
3-barreling

3-barreling is one of those more sexy subjects you could probably write a 1000 pages on
and still not have covered every aspect involved, so there is no need to try that here. But I
do want to give you some information to think about the subject on your own and to
improve your general strategy towards 3-barreling at the micros.

General tip: A/K high boards are not the best for 3-barreling, since most of our
fold equity was on the flop and there are not many scare cards that can come.

What is most important to remember is the big difference between recreational players
and regulars. When going trough your database there should be a clear difference to see
between the calling % of recreational players on all streets and those of regulars. To give
you an example that should already be able to improve your game:
Fish
fold to cbet (flop, turn, river):
45, 31, 42

Regular

fold to cbet (flop, turn, river):

49, 45, 43

As you can tell, once fishes have decided to call the flop, they are usually sticking with it
untill the river. One conclusion would be that against regulars you could opt for a b, b, x
line while against fish you should either bet once, or three times.

Calling river bets

Calling river bets is too often still a spot for many that is nothing more than just a
guessing game. Especially in wide-range poker such as 3-handed and HU formats it can
be very difficult trying to pinpoint someones range while having 10 seconds left to decide
for all your chips. But almost just as often we don't even have to go trough reconstructing
the entire hand, counting combos, and other things that come with your decision making
process.
Very few recreational opponents do not have sizing tells. Especially when it comes to
river bets this often becomes very clear, when their thought process can almost be broken
down into two parts that have corresponding bet sizes: 'I want my opponent to fold', and 'I
want my opponent to call'. A simple example of this could be the following hand:

BTN (500) raises to 40

SB (500) folds
HERO (500) calls 20 with Qs6s
flop: Ac2d6h
HERO checks,BTN bets 50, HERO
calls
turn: 7h
HERO checks, BTN checks
While this is definitely an oversimplified river: Kd
example to illustrate our point, this is a spot HERO checks, BTN bets 175, HERO
where many players are still left lost and has an easy call
frustrated thinking their opponent probably
spiked a K on the river. But when thinking about this spot a bit more in depth we come to
a different conclusion. Assuming BTN is a recreational player, we can also make the
assumption that he would have bet all of his Ax hands on the turn for pure value, together
with his sets, two pairs, combo-draws, and perhaps a couple of bluffs. But with most of
the air in his range he will give up on the turn, afraid of HERO calling him down with Ax.
While we and other regulars will know that we don't have that many Ax hands in our pre-
flop flatting range since we are 3-betting most of those pre-flop, it is important to
remember this is not the level a recreational player will be thinking on.
And while the river may seem like a great scarecard to many to try and bluff us after we
check the river as well, it is very important to pay close attention to the sizing that is being
used in spots such as this one. What it comes down to is basically this: our opponent does
not have a hand from the absolute top of his range, so betting this big makes no sense for
him. Also because our range looks rather weak, even to players that barely pay any
attention at all to this. This would mean value betting huge does not maky any sense, since
a weak range won't be calling a bet that big.
The only exception here would be if we would be up against a thinking regular, who
would realize that a big bet-sizing will look bluffy in these spots and in turn would bet all
of his value hands including Kx close to pot.
Spots like these occur far more often than we may realize so take your time to think this
trough the next time you're playing. Does the sizing your opponent is using make sense
with the rest of the story he is telling? If your opponent is unlikely to have an absolute
nutted hand and is going for a thin value bet, would he be betting close to pot? When
people are using big betting sizes they are very polarized, and on certain boards this just
does not make any sense.
Chapter Three
Extra content

The multiplier effect

The multiplier effect is a very simple concept: the bigger the multiplier you are playing
for, the bigger the impact it has on the players involved. If you have already played
enough Spin and Go's yourself you probably have noticed differences in behaviour with
your opponents, or maybe even with yourself, when you spin a 2x multiplier. The smaller
the prize pool, the less interested most people are. Spin and Go's attract many types of
players but they all have one thing in common and that is they start every game hoping to
spin big.
What is important for us to realize that we are in this for the long run and have a clear
strategy for making money at the micros. A very big part of our winrate will actually
come from opponents playing too loosely in the low multipliers, giving us the option of
picking up an almost uncontested buy-in. It may not seem as cool or sexy as winning big
every day, but it is key to grinding out our profit every month.
This also works the other way, as in the bigger multipliers we will find people playing
either just a bit too tight, or even completely shutting down. Simply put we can divide the
effect this has between groups. Around 2-6x has either a loose effect on people or none,
while 10x and up we will see people becoming more tight. Make sure to pay attention and
use this to your advantage.
Mental game

While Spin and Go's are the single most fishy format, they are also a guarantee for big
swings both ways. Because of the fast play, the many all-in situations, and the loose
nature of most players involved, fairly big swings are unavoidable. What's important is
not to get caught up too much in the moment when you are in the middle of one of these
swings. In Spin and Go's it is fairly easy to get in high volume when you start playing
more hours at 2+ tables. Yet in the studiegroups I've hosted many players still got very
upset over 50-100 streaks of bad luck and running way below EV.
It is of course very understandable that when you feel you are playing well, yet you are
not winning anything this can get to you at times. What's important is to be mature and
professional about it and analyze yourself a bit more. Why do you feel angry when you
are on a downswing? Or why do you feel insecure about your game if you don't win big
after just a small sample?
Many of these feeling can be traced back to solvable problems. A simple example is most
players get angry when they lose 25 buy-ins in a session at a certain level, while at one
level lower this would not have that much impact on their mental state. It is important for
you to not get your ego involved too much when it comes to poker, and despite knowing
you can beat a certain level it might be good to move down every now and then when the
situation asks for it.
FREE Push/Fold Chart

Perfect your push/fold game with our chart. We have created a push/fold chart for Spin
and Go's based on the NASH principles. This can help you find that extra edge over your
opponents. In games where you will find yourself with 2 regulars, this chart could just be
the thing to give you that extra edge. Always keep it open on the side to do your quick
check-ups, or use it after your session when you do your reviews.

The ultimate Spin and Go Chart

Calling it a chart would not do our solver justice. It is the ultimate way to see your winrate
skyrocket, improve your game, and grind out that solid profit even at the swingy Spin and
Go's. If you are serious about generating a second income from poker or are just sick of
losing and feeling lost, then this is for you.
General tip: this is the one and only chart you will need to crush the micros.

For every single opening situation you can think of we will show you exactly what the
best option is. These charts are based on thousands and thousands of hands in Spin and
Go's and over 10 years of online poker experience. Get the beta version now at an
extremely discounted price of only $9.99, before we release the real deal ($45.99)!
FAQ
What is cEV?

Cev stands for 'Chip Expected Value' it shows your expectation (profit or loss for each
play) based on the number of tournament chips won or lost.

$ev stands for 'Dollar Expected Value', this shows your expectation (again profit / loss)
based on your current prize pool equity. That is the amount in dollars that your chip stack
is currently worth based on your average chance of finishing 1st, 2nd, 3rd or in the non-
paying spot of 4th.

To calculate your cEV for Spin and Go's you simply look up your total chips won, and
divide the amount by the total number of games played.

How many hands/games do I need before I can estimate my cEV?

While it is certainly very tempting to look for conclusions more early on, probably around
5000 games would be necessary to come up with a close enough estimation regarding
your cEV.

How much +cEV is a good winrate at the micro's?

While 80+ is considered crushing, at the micros 70-80 should be very achievable when
playing solid.

How big are the swings?

Probably a bit bigger than you would have hoped for. Spin and Go's can get quite swingy
because of the fast nature of the game, and swings of around 50-70BI are not extremely
rare.

What is the best way to make money at the micro's quickly?

While there are definitely no 'get rich quick' shortcuts to be taken in poker, when using
our interactive charts at [link] you are using a system that is proven to be winning money
at the micros. We have gone over thousands and thousands of hands and calculations for
you and have put together this system to help you feel more confident and get a solid
foundation at the Spin and Go's.

Why is the chart so cheap?

Because we are currently providing the Beta version, which will serve mainly to test our
product experience and to familiarize people with our Power Chart. There might still be a
few things we need to adjust to make sure you will get the ultimate Spin and Go
experience and so it would not feel right to already ask the full price for this. The back-
end you can download now will not change, since all the calculations are done and
correct. This is the information we are providing right now and we will be using this for
our first release version.

Our actual product will be released in App form and will be around 2.5x the price of our
Beta version, which means if you act now you will get an amazing product at a huge
discount.