Scribd
Upload
10 views

Rubric Philo

The rubric evaluates collaborative presentations on criteria including content, design, and oral delivery. For content, it evaluates the depth of understanding, research efforts, accuracy, and proper citation. For design, it evaluates visual appeal and cohesiveness. For oral delivery, it evaluates communication skills, time management, and participation of group members. The exemplary level demonstrates thorough understanding, substantive research, accurate sequenced content, appealing cohesive design, and highly effective polished delivery within the time limit with equal participation.

Uploaded by

Lovely Almazan Ebardaloza
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
10 views

Rubric Philo

The rubric evaluates collaborative presentations on criteria including content, design, and oral delivery. For content, it evaluates the depth of understanding, research efforts, accuracy, and proper citation. For design, it evaluates visual appeal and cohesiveness. For oral delivery, it evaluates communication skills, time management, and participation of group members. The exemplary level demonstrates thorough understanding, substantive research, accurate sequenced content, appealing cohesive design, and highly effective polished delivery within the time limit with equal participation.

Uploaded by

Lovely Almazan Ebardaloza
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Collaborative Presentation Rubric – In-Class or Online (with Oral Delivery)

Criteria Unsatisfactory-Beginning Developing Accomplished Exemplary Total


Presentation/ 0-10 points 11-20 points 21-30 points 31-40 points /40
Content Presentation content shows a lack Presentation content shows Presentation content shows an Presentation content shows a
(Group grade) of understanding of the topic. general understanding of the adequate understanding of the thorough understanding of the
There is inadequate evidence of topic. There is limited evidence topic. Some research effort is topic. Substantive research
research and insufficient relevant of research in locating relevant evident in locating relevant effort is evident in locating
information and facts. Content is information and facts and/or information and facts. Content is relevant information and facts.
confusing and/or contains supporting statements made. mostly accurate and reasonably Content is accurate and
frequent inaccuracies. Required Content contains some organized. May contain some sequenced in a clear, logical
elements are missing and/or inaccuracies, inconsistencies, inconsistencies in content or way. All required elements are
randomly organized. Sources, if misinterpretations, and/or some connections made may not included and sources are
included, generally lack proper somewhat unclear. A required be supported. Required properly cited (APA 6th ed.).
citation format (APA 6th ed.). element may be missing elements are included and
and/or some sources may be sources are properly cited (APA
improperly cited (APA 6th ed.). 6th ed.) for the most part.
Presentation/ 0-5 points 6-10 points 11-13 points 14-15 points /15
Design Lack of visual appeal. The The visual presentation is The visual presentation is The group presented the
(Group grade) presentation is not appealing. It somewhat appealing. There is appealing. There is a presentation in a very appealing
lacks cohesiveness a cohesiveness but there are cohesiveness and very few and interesting manner. There is
some inconsistencies. inconsistencies. cohesiveness in each part.
Presentation/ 0-11 points 12 points 13 points 14-15 points /15
Oral Delivery Ineffective in delivering the oral Somewhat effective in Effective in delivering the oral Highly effective in delivering a
(Group grade) presentation demonstrating below delivering the oral presentation demonstrating good well-polished oral presentation
average/poor communication presentation demonstrating communication skills and within the time limit for the
skills. Substantially over/under the average communication skills. generally close to the time limit group to present (not more than
time limit to present and/or not all Slightly over/under the time for the group to present (not 10 minutes total). All group
members presented. Lack of limit. Some members more than 10 minutes total). All members presented equally.
preparation was evident. presented more than others. group members presented and Preparation was strongly
More preparation was needed. preparation was evident for the evident.
most part.

Rubric by Denise Kreiger, Instructional Design and Technology Services, SC&I, Rutgers University, 4/2014

You might also like