9dc1dpaper 3
9dc1dpaper 3
Kanika Chopra
Apeejay Institute of Management Technical Campus, Jalandhar, India
Abstract
The present times of flux and competition necessitate innovative and out-of-the box training strategies
which can help in making employees adept to confront the surmounting job challenges. Despite horde of
training techniques, the employees’ competencies do not suffice the skill-set required. This calls for new
and interactive training techniques for holistic development of employees so as to enhance the employees’
efficiency and effectiveness. The paper tried to explore new and innovative training methods to enhance
employees’ competencies and conceptualize unconventional and out-of-the-box training techniques which
would help employees assume their enhanced roles effectively. Some of these interactive and innovative
training techniques that can be employed include: the not-so-valued perspective which further comprises the
failure’s foresight, the octogenarian cell and jet paced geniuses; putting everyone in the boss’ shoe; sweeping
roles with the competitors; Pecha kuccha and Learning management system (LMS).
Introduction
The present corporate times are characterized by change, competition and innovation. These
competitive and constantly changing times require the taskforce to be equally competent and
equipped to handle surmounting corporate pressure and challenges. In fact employees these days
also have an inclination to join only those organisations wherein they can also avail opportunities
for their knowledge update. Most of the top-notch organizations have provision of learning
opportunities. This serves as a lucrative retention strategy for these big giants. This strategy is
being widely used by organisations. They would rather invest in training and not let short term
training budgets outweigh the long term benefits. Undoubtedly, as the workforce has to be
delegated with varied roles & responsibilities, such training enables them carry out these roles &
responsibilities & prepare them for the future responsibilities as well.
Dale S. Beach, highlights the significance of imparting training to employees stating that
training is a very systematic process which is employed to enable individuals gain knowledge and
Review of Literature
Michael J. Jucius, supports Beach’s views and states that training enables individuals acquire
and enhance competencies and capabilities that are specific to their job requirements. Oatey
(1970) lays stress on benefits of training. He emphasises the significance of training in enhancing
employee’s potential of carrying out a task. He further adds that it also ensures an all-round social,
mental and intellectual development of the employees. This is instrumental not only in giving
a boost to the productivity but also in improving employee’s overall efficiency and personality.
Yoder (1970) stated that training should incorporate a quintessential component “development” as
well. This will make employees reach their full potential. Training alone is not suffice and should
be expanded to include development of the personnel concerned. Raymond (1986) did research on
training stating that the success of any training technique is largely dependent on the personality
and behavioural traits of the trainees themselves. He added that motivated employees would
help in success of training programmes. He also added that such factors as motivation, favourable
environment have hitherto not received much consideration. He iterated that the attitude and
characteristics of the trainees go a long way in influencing any training programme and should be
given due importance.
Whitlock (1986) stated that the training and development should go beyond the confines
of conventional training techniques and strategies. He highlighted the significance of looking
for new training methods and also stressed the significance of making a thorough analysis
of objectives, needs, employee traits, capabilities, resources available etc, before finalizing a
training approach. Carlos A. Primo Braga, (1995) states that the instructional style or the strategy
of delivery is of great importance in any training. The trainer’s role cannot be undermined in
determining the success of any training programme. Michael Armstrong, (2000) also highlighted
that the trainees get influenced by the delivery style tremendously. Griffin and others (2000)
also seconded Armstrong’s view as they asserted that the impressiveness of trainer is very
important. The trainer should be able to keep the audience engrossed with his delivery style.
Tan, Hall and Boyce (2003) in their research on training stated that realizing the pertinence of
training programmes, organisations these days are investing in them a lot. The organisations are
foreseeing the importance of training for their employees and are keeping substantiate budget for
training programmes as well. Ruvolo, P., Whitehill, J., Virnes, M., & Movellan (2008), have given
a comprehensive analysis of various on-the-job and off-the-job training styles. They have stressed
on the significance of apprenticeship as a training style in business world. David Mc Guire and
Mammed Bagher in the year (2010) reviewed a big corpus of literature on training, diversity
training in particular. They highlighted the significance of diversity training in organisations,
References
Andersson, T. (2010). Struggles of managerial being and becoming. Journal of Management Development, 29(2),
167-176. doi:10.1108/02621711011019305
Armstrong, M. (2000). Performance Management: Key Strategies and Practical Guidelines. London: Kogan Page.
Bailey, H. C., Miller, J. L., Miller, M. J., & Dhaliwal, B. S. (1995). Application of Toxicity Identification
Procedures to the Echinoderm Fertilization Assay To Identify Toxicity In A Municipal Effluent.
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 14(12), 2181. doi:10.1897/1552-8618(1995)14[2181:aotipt]2.0.co;2
Beach, D. S. (1980). Managing People at Work: Readings in Personnel. New York: Macmillan.
Best Free Learning Management Systems (LMS). (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.academyofmine.
com/12-best-free-learning-management-systems-lms/
Blockchain Academy. (2010). 7 Innovative Training Concepts White Paper August 2010. Retrieved from https://
www.slideshare.net/LeavesFX/7-innovative-training-concepts-white-paper-august-2010
Davis, R. (1983). The Role of the Trainer‐Counsellor in Management Training. Industrial and Commercial
Training, 15(8), 244-245. doi:10.1108/eb003952
Dessler, G. (2002). A Framework for Management. Upper Saddle River (N.J.): Prentice Hall.
Frazis, H., & Loewenstein, M. A. (2013). How Responsive are Quits to Benefits? Journal of Human Resources,
48(4), 969-997. doi:10.1353/jhr.2013.0026
George, C. S. (1972). The History of Management Thought. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Harzing, A. (1995). International Human Resource Management : An Integrated Approach. London : Sage
Publications.
Kraiger, K., Ford, J.K., & Salas, E. (1993) Application of cognitive, skill-based, and affective theories of
learning outcomes to new methods of training, evaluation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(2), 311.
Mcguire, D., & Bagher, M. (2010). Diversity Training in Organisations: An Introduction. Journal of European
Industrial Training, 34(6), 493-505. doi:10.1108/03090591011061185
Naachimuthu, K. P. (2007). We are from Knowledge Sharing Culture. Management and Labour Studies, 32(3),
369-374. doi:10.1177/0258042x0703200308
Oatey, M. (1970). The Economics of Training with respect to the Firm. British Journal of Industrial Relations,
8(1), 1-21.
Ransom, R., & Matela, R. J. (1986). Computer Graphics in Biology. Boston : Springer.
Ruvolo, P., Whitehill, J., Virnes, M., & Movellan, J. (2008). Building a more effective teaching robot using
apprenticeship learning. Paper presented in Development and Learning, 2008. ICDL 2008. 7th IEEE
International Conference (pp.209-214) IEEE.
Tan, J. A., Hall, R. J., & Boyce, C. (2003). The role of employee reactions in predicting training effectiveness.
Human Resource Development Quarterly, 14(4), 397-411.
Yoder, D. E. (1970). Some Viewpoints of the Speech, Hearing, and Language Clinician. Williams. F. (Eds),
Language and Poverty, (pp.400-415). New York : Academic Press.
Author’s Profile
Kanika Chopra is serving as Assistant Professor in Apeejay Institute of Management Technical Campus,
Jalandhar, India. She has a teaching experience of more than 12 years. Her credentials include: B.Sc.
(Economics), MA in English (Language and Literature) and M.Ed. She has also cleared UGC –NET (English)
Examination for lectureship. She was University’s Merit Position holder in the University Examination of MA
English Part II. She has been teaching Business Communication, Communicative English. English Language,
Literature & Professional Ethics to under graduate and post graduate students for over a decade now. She
has delivered presentations on “Communication Skills”, “Phonology of English Language”, “Personality
Development” etc. in various educational institutions. Besides teaching, she is also engaged in Creative
Writing & Technical Writing. She is the Associate Editor of Creative Section of Institute’s Magazine and also
Convener of Institute’s Newsletter Committee and the Literary Club. She is also the co-convener of the Public
Relations Committee of the institute. She has got her research papers, articles and book reviews published in
various journals. She has also presented papers in national and international conferences.