Questions and Answers ISO 9001
Questions and Answers ISO 9001
We answer lots of questions and post answers in our FAQ page. Here are
some common ones:
"Thanks for a great product that has exactly met our needs. The documents
are well laid-out, easy to alter and easy to understand for general staff
requirements. Your product has significantly reduced the time and effort
required to implement ISO 9001. Everyone struggles when trying to write a
manual or procedures. I would prefer to spend my organization's quality
time and money on the continual improvement concepts of our ISO-9001
system, as opposed to belaboring the semantics of a Quality Manual". Pat,
Enerflex More feedback...
Technical Questions
What is a "pre-assessment"?
Consultancies offer a pre-assessment visit before the full-blown registrar’s
certification assessment. It is usually a 1-2 day visit, dependent on the size of your
organization. It is always advisable to have a pre-assessment audit as it provides
a chance for the assessor to take a preliminary overview look at your systems,
and to point out any glaring problems that will have to be fixed before the
certification assessment.
Failed to carry out checks on its suppliers to ensure that all constituent parts of
their products were fit for human consumption as required by procedure
ASP069/A/2,
Not implement its product recall procedure within the maximum time period
stated in procedure ASP007/A/4 on discovering its products contained the ban
food dye Sudan 1.
Corrective action is about dealing with the "clean-up operation" after a business
process has failed.
What does design validation mean?
Your Design validation process is the way in which your business examines the
products from your design process to ensure they meet both your and your
customer's expectations when in use. You will need to collect and collate data on
the products that you have designed to ensure they are functioning as expected in
the environment in which they are used.
There are now hundreds of registration bodies out there, many of which
specialize in particular fields of registration. I will say that bigger does not
necessarily mean better, many of the smaller certification bodies may be more
familiar with your industry or service sector and can offer a personalized service.
However, before employing a certification body to carry out the certification of
your business there are certain things that you must check.
Make sure that the certification bodies ISO 9001:2000 certificates are recognized and
accepted in your industry and by your customers.
Find out whether a recognized accreditation body has formally accredited your
certification body and that their accreditation covers your industry or service sector.
The frequency and cost of surveillance audits.
Total costs for certification cycle i.e. annual management fees, surveillance visits,
auditor travel and accommodation fees etc.
Confirm how much the certification body will charge to apply for registration and to
maintain your registration. How much it will cost for the initial assessment, for the
certification audit, and for future surveillance audits and reassessments where
applicable.
The above is intended a guidance only there may be other specific requirements
related to your business or industry sector.
(6) Records
Records provide evidence that the company meets the requirements stated in the
Quality Manual, Quality Procedures, Quality Policy, Quality Objectives and Work
Instructions. There are numerous sections in which ISO 9001:2008 specifically requires
records.
"A Standard Operating Procedure is a document which describes the regularly recurring
operations relevant to the quality of the investigation. The purpose of a SOP is to carry
out the operations correctly and always in the same manner. A SOP should be available
at the place where the work is done".
A SOP is a compulsory instruction. If deviations from this instruction are allowed, the
conditions for these should be documented including who can give permission for this
and what exactly the complete procedure will be. The original should rest at a secure
place while working copies should be authenticated with stamps and/or signatures of
authorized persons.
Several categories and types of SOPs can be distinguished. The name "SOP" may not
always be appropriate, e.g., the description of situations or other matters may better
designated protocols, instructions or simply registration
forms. Also worksheets belonging to an analytical procedure have to be standardized
(to avoid jotting down readings and calculations on odd pieces of paper).
As implied above, the initiative and further procedure for the preparation,
implementation and management of the documents is a procedure in itself which should
be described. These SOPs should at least mention:
a. who can or should make which type of SOP;
b. to whom proposals for a SOP should be submitted, and who adjudges the draft;
c. the procedure of approval;
d. who decides on the date of implementation, and who should be informed;
e. how revisions can be made or how a SOP can be withdrawn.
It should be established and recorded who is responsible for the proper distribution of
the documents, the filing and administration (e.g. of the original and further copies).
Finally, it should be indicated how frequently a valid SOP should be periodically
evaluated (usually 2 years) and by whom. Only officially issued copies may be used,
only then the use of the proper instruction is guaranteed.
In the laboratory the procedure for the preparation of a SOP should be as follows:
The Head of Laboratory (HoL) charges a staff member of the laboratory to draft a SOP
(or the HoL does this himself or a staff member takes the initiative). In principle, the
author is the person who will work with the SOP, but he or she should always keep in
mind that the SOP needs to be understood by others. The author requests a new
registration number from the SOP administrator or custodian (which in smaller institutes
or laboratories will often be the HoL, see 2.4). The administrator verifies if the SOP
already exists (or is drafted). If the SOP does not exist yet, the title and author are
entered into the registration system. Once the writing of a SOP is undertaken, the
management must actively support this effort and allow authors adequate preparation
time.
In case of methodic or apparatus SOPs the author asks one or more qualified
colleagues to try out the SOP. In case of execution procedures for investigations or
protocols, the project leader or HoL could do the testing. In this phase the wording of
the SOP is fine-tuned. When the test is passed, the SOP is submitted to the SOP
administrator for acceptance. Revisions of SOPs follow the same procedure.
b. a summary of the contents with purpose and field of application (if these are not
evident from the title); if
desired the principle may be given, including a list of points that may need attention;
e. name and signature of author, including date of signing. (It is possible to record the
authors centrally in a register);
f. name and signature of person who authorizes the introduction of the SOP (including
date).
3. The necessary equipment, reagents (including grade) and other means should be
detailed.
5. It is recommended to include criteria for the control of the described system during
operation.
From this description it would seem that the preparation and administration of a SOP
and other quality assurance documentation is an onerous job. However, once the draft
is made, with the use of word processors and a simple distribution scheme of persons
and departments involved, the task can be considerably eased.
A model for a simple preparation and distribution scheme is given in Figure 2-1. This is
a relation matrix which can not only be used for the laboratory but for any department or
a whole institute. In this matrix (which can be given the status of a SOP) can be
indicated all persons or departments that are involved with the subject as well as the
kind of their involvement. This can be indicated in the scheme with an involvement
code. Some of the most usual involvements are (the number can be used as the code):
1. Taking initiative for drafting
2. Drafting the document
3. Verifying
4. Authorizing
5. Implementing/using
6. Copy for information
7. Checking implementation
8. Archiving
It is worthwhile to set up a good filing system for all documents right at the outset. This
will spare much inconvenience, confusion and embarrassment, not only in internal use
but also with respect to the institute's management, authorities, clients and, if
applicable, inspectors of the accreditation body.
The administrator responsible for distribution and archiving SOPs may differ per
institute. In large institutes or institutes with an accredited laboratory this will be the
Quality Assurance Officer, otherwise this may be an officer of the department of
Personnel & Organization or still someone else. In non-accredited laboratories the
administration can most conveniently be done by the head of laboratory or his deputy.
The administration may be done in a logbook, by means of a card system or, more
conveniently, with a computerized database such as Perfect View or Card box.
Suspending files are very useful for keeping originals, copies and other information of
documents. The most logic system seems to make an appropriate grouping into
categories and a master index for easy retrieval. It is most convenient to keep these
files at a central place such as the office of the head of laboratory. Naturally, this does
not apply to working documents that obviously are used at the work place in the
laboratory, e.g., instrument logbooks, operation instruction manuals and laboratory
notebooks.
The data which should be stored per document are:
- SOP number
- version number
- date of issue
- date of expiry
- title
- author
- status (title submitted; being drafted; draft ready; issued)
- department of holders/users
- names of holders
- number of copies per holder if this is more than one
- registration number of SOPs to which reference is made
- historical data (dates of previous issues)
The SOP administrator keeps at least two copies of each SOP; one for the historical
and one for the back-up file. This also applies to revised versions. Superseded versions
should be collected and destroyed (except the copy for the historical file) to avoid
confusion and unauthorized use.
Examples of various categories of SOPs will be given in the ensuing chapters. The
contents of a SOP for the administration and management of SOPs can be distilled from
the above. An example of the basic format is given as Model F 002.
Unless recorded automatically, raw data and readings of measurements are most
conveniently written down on worksheets that can be prepared for each analytical
method or procedure, including calibration of equipment. In addition, each laboratory
staff member should have a personal Notebook in which all observations, remarks,
calculations and other actions connected with the work are recorded in ink, not with a
pencil, so that they will not be erased or lost. To ensure integrity such a notebook must
meet a few minimum requirements: on the cover it must carry a unique serial number,
the owner's name, and the date of issue. The copy is issued by the QA officer or head
of laboratory who keeps a record of this (e.g. in his/her own Notebook). The user signs
for receipt, the QA officer or HoL for issue. The Notebook should be bound and the
pages numbered before issue (loose-leaf bindings are not GLP!). The first one or two
pages can be used for an index of contents (to be filled in as the book is used). Such
Notebooks can made from ordinary notebooks on sale (before issue, the page
numbering should then be done by hand or with a special stamp) or with the help of a
word processor and then printed and bound in a graphical workshop.
The instructions for the proper use of a laboratory notebook should be set down in a
protocol, an example is given as Model PROT 005. A model for the pages in a
laboratory notebook is given.
Do not forget that Quality Management is a tool rather than a goal. The goal is quality
performance of the laboratory.
SOPs
1. PURPOSE
2. PRINCIPLE
Standard Operating Procedures are an essential part of a quality system. For all jobs
and duties relevant operating procedures should be available at the work station. To
guarantee that the correct version of the instruction is used copying Standard Operating
Procedures is prohibited. Standard Operating Procedures are issued on paper with the
heading printed in green.
3. FIELD OF APPLICATION
Generally for use in the quality system of RSSI but more specifically this instruction is
for use in the Chemistry Department.
4. RELATED SOPs
- F 011 The preparation of SOPs for apparatus
- F 012 The preparation of SOPs for methods
- PROJ 001 The preparation of SOPs for special investigations
5. REQUIREMENTS
6. PROCEDURE
6.1 Administration
The administration of SOPs for the Chemistry Department can be done by the Head of
Laboratory.
When the Sop fulfils all the necessary requirements it is printed. The author hands over
the manuscript (or the floppy disk with text) to the SOP administrator who is responsible
for the printing. The number of copies is decided by him/her and the author. Make
matrix of distribution (see Guidelines for Quality Management Fig. 2-1).
The author (or his successor) signs all copies in the presence of the administrator
before distribution. As the new copies are distributed the old ones (if there was one) are
taken in. For each SOP a list of holders is made. The holder signs for receipt of a copy.
The list is kept with the spare copies.
Copying SOPs is forbidden. Extra copies can be obtained from the SOP administrator.
Users are responsible for proper keeping of the SOPs. If necessary, copies can be
protected by a cover or foil, and/or be kept in a loose-leaf binding.
7. ARCHIVING
Proper archiving is essential for good administration of SOPs. All operating instructions
should be kept up-to-date and be accessible to personnel. Good Laboratory Practice
requires that all documentation pertaining to a test or investigation should be kept for a
certain period. SOPs belong to this documentation.
8. REFERENCES
Mention here the used Standards and other references for this SOP.
PROT 005 - The Use of Laboratory Notebooks
LOGO STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE Page: 1 # 2
Model: F 002 Version: 1 Date: 95-11-28
Title: The Use of Laboratory Notebooks File:
1. PURPOSE
To give instruction for proper lay-out, use and administration of Laboratory Notebooks in
order to guarantee the integrity and retrievability of raw data (if no preprinted Work
Sheets are used), calculations and notes pertaining to the laboratory work.
2. PRINCIPLE
Laboratory Notebooks may either be issued to persons for personal use or to Study
Projects for common use by participating persons. They are used to write down
observations, remarks, calculations and other actions in connection with the work. They
may be used for raw data but bound preprinted Work Sheets are preferred for this.
3. RELATED SOPs
F 001 Administration of SOPs
PROJ 001 The preparation of SOPs for Special Investigations
4. REQUIREMENTS
Bound notebooks with about 100-150 consecutively numbered pages. Any binding
which cannot be opened is suitable; a spiral binding is very convenient.
Both ruled and squared paper can be used. On each page provisions for dating and
signing for entries, and signing for verification or inspection may be made.
5. PROCEDURE
5.1 Issue
Notebooks are issued by or on behalf of the Head of Laboratory who keeps a record of
the books in circulation (this record may have a format similar to a Laboratory Notebook
or be part of the HoL's own Notebook).
On the cover, the book is marked with an assigned (if not preprinted) serial number and
the name of the user (or of the project). On the inside of the cover the HoL writes the
date of issue and signs for issue. The user (or Project Leader) signs the circulation
record for receipt.
5.2 Use
All entries are dated and made in ink. The person who makes the entry signs per entry
(in project notebooks) or at least per page (in personal notebooks). The Head of
Laboratory (and/or Project Leader) may inspect or verify entries and pages and may
sign for this on the page(s) concerned.
If entries are corrected, this should be lined out with a single line so that it is possible to
see what has been corrected. Essential corrections should be initialed and dated and
the reason for correction stated. Pages may not be removed; if necessary, a whole
page may be deleted by a diagonal line.
Author: Sign.:
QA Officer (sign.): Date of Expiry:
5.3 Withdrawal
When fall, the Notebook is exchanged for a new one. The HoL is responsible for proper
archiving. A notebook belonging to a Study Project is withdrawn when the study is
completed.
When an employee leaves the laboratory for other post (s)he should hand in her/his
notebook to the HoL
6. ARCHIVING
7. REFERENCES
Model page of Laboratory Notebook
Date/Signature SUBJECT
Verified by:
Signature: ______________________ WO/Test no. __________________
Date: __________________________ File: _________________________