Predictors of Continuance Intention
Predictors of Continuance Intention
https://www.emerald.com/insight/0959-0552.htm
gender as moderator
Barbara Francioni and Ilaria Curina 1437
Department of Communication Sciences,
Humanities and International Studies, University of Urbino, Urbino, Italy Received 4 November 2021
Revised 10 December 2021
Sabrina M. Hegner 11 December 2021
7 February 2022
Department of Applied Sciences, 13 April 2022
Bremen University of Applied Sciences School of Social Sciences, 14 April 2022
Accepted 13 June 2022
Bremen, Germany, and
Marco Cioppi
Department of Communication Sciences,
Humanities and International Studies, University of Urbino, Urbino, Italy
Abstract
Purpose – The COVID-19 has brought with it valuable opportunities for the retail sector. Notably, online channels
have assumed a key role for businesses that can rely less on physical channels due to the pandemic’s restrictions.
Within this context, the study aims to identify the main antecedents leading to the formation of the male and female
customers’ continuance intention of using online food delivery services (OFDS) in the restaurant industry.
Design/methodology/approach – A web-based self-completion survey and a subsequent structural
equation modelling have been employed on a sample of 360 participants.
Findings – Findings reveal that perceived healthiness, quarantine procedures, perceived hygiene, perceived
ease of app use and attitude significantly influence continuance intention. Moreover, the moderator analysis
corroborates that male consumers’ continuance intention is mainly influenced by perceived healthiness,
quarantine procedures and perceived hygiene. Conversely, female customers’ continuance intention is
predicated on perceived healthiness and attitude.
Research limitations/implications – Although the adoption of a sample of young customers (18–29 years)
guarantees good research internal validity, findings are not generalizable.
Practical implications – The study provides valuable contributions for restaurants related to the (1)
creation/management of their own OFDS platforms; (2) selection of the right third-party platforms.
Originality/value – The paper is one of the first studies examining the predictors impacting on customers’
OFDS continuance intention in the COVID-19 context by also focusing on gender differences.
Keywords Online food delivery services, Continuance intention, COVID-19, Continuance intention
antecedents, Gender, Moderator analysis
Paper type Research paper
1. Introduction
The COVID-19 pandemic has profoundly modified retailers’ practices and consumers’ buying
behaviours (Zulauf et al., 2021), thus bringing different businesses to face complex challenges
(Belarmino et al., 2021).
© Barbara Francioni, Ilaria Curina, Sabrina M. Hegner and Marco Cioppi. Published by Emerald
Publishing Limited. This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) licence.
Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both International Journal of Retail &
commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and Distribution Management
Vol. 50 No. 12, 2022
authors. The full terms of this licence may be seen at http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode pp. 1437-1457
The authors would like to thank Nicola Narcisi for his valuable contribution in the data collection Emerald Publishing Limited
0959-0552
phase. DOI 10.1108/IJRDM-11-2021-0537
IJRDM The catering industry definitely represents one of the retail categories most affected by this
50,12 crisis. Notably, restaurants have been forced to close for several months due to the different
lockdown restrictions (Kumar and Shah, 2021). At once, these firms have also experienced a
higher demand opportunity related to the possibility to serve their customers at home, thus
delivering their products in an environment perceived by people as safer (Naeem, 2021;
Roggeveen and Sethuraman, 2020). Against this background, the online food delivery services
have assumed a key role, thus representing, in particular during the lockdown periods, the only
1438 connection between restaurants and their customers. Literature defines online food delivery
services (OFDS) as easy and convenient tools for customers to buy food online, thus avoiding to
physically go to the restaurant (Prasetyo et al., 2021). Notably, they represent a combination
between the traditional Food Delivery (FD) concept (i.e. orders are taken by phone to a specific
restaurant and delivered by the restaurant’s rider) and the advent of the digital tools (Seghezzi
and Mangiaracina, 2021). Indeed, from this combination, a new business was originated, with
restaurants able to expand their activity either by creating their firm-owned platforms (e.g.
Restaurant-to-Consumer platforms; branded mobile apps) (Dirsehan and Cankat, 2021;
Patsiotis et al., 2020) or by joining to third-party ones (e.g. Platform-to-Consumers, such as
Glovo and Deliveroo) (Dirsehan and Cankat, 2021; Kapoor and Vij, 2018; Petit et al., 2022), which
are “usually managed by independent companies that take orders from users, communicate
with restaurants and carry out the food delivery activities using gig workers” (Troise et al.,
2021, p. 665). If before the COVID-19 crisis, European restaurants tended to use these services
sporadically, with the rise of the pandemic, these businesses have been forced to massively
adopt these tools in order to survive. From the customers’ perspective, the COVID-19
emergency approached new clients to these services who had never ordered food at home
through online delivery services or had not felt the necessity of using them (Just Eat, 2020). In
particular, during 2020, the European interest toward the OFDS adoption rose by 140%, with
Italy obtaining one of the best performances, equal to þ180% (Reply, 2021). Moreover, the most
active clients belong to the Millennials and Generation Z, while as regards gender, both men and
women adopt OFDS in an almost completely balanced way (Just Eat, 2020).
Overall, these data enable to corroborate that the pandemic has profoundly transformed
consumers’ food consumption patterns by bringing people to increasingly use OFDS. This
attitude, together with the feelings of anxiety/fear deriving from the perceived risk of
infection during dinners out, has led and is leading people to opt for these services even in the
stages of COVID-19 restrictions’ reduction. Therefore, this means that the OFDS adoption will
represent not only an outcome of the pandemic crisis but also a trend for years to come (Reply,
2021). In this respect, literature underlines the importance of identifying the main antecedents
of customers’ intention of continuing to use OFDS during and after the COVID-19 pandemic
(Kartono and Tjahjadi, 2021).
Starting from these assumptions, the present study aims to explore the influence of
different antecedents on the customers’ continuance intention of using OFDS. Moreover, the
research seeks to identify the possible role of gender as moderator. In particular, according to
the extant literature, gender represents a demographic feature that usually influences
customers’ behaviours, especially for what concerns food consumption habits. Therefore, it
could become crucial for restaurants to create specific marketing strategies based on this
variable (Hwang and Kim, 2019).
With respect to the antecedents, the paper focuses on three areas. The first category of
antecedents concerns the food safety area since, in a pandemic context, the food condition assumes
a key role (Shim et al., 2021). In this respect, perceived healthiness, perceived hygiene and
quarantine procedures will be the object of the present research. The second group of predictors is
strictly related to the pandemic situation, and it is composed of fear of COVID-19 and perceived risk
of eating out. Indeed, the pandemic fear has led to the online retail development and, in particular,
to the digital transition of food retailing (Kazancoglu and Demir, 2021) through the adoption of
OFDS (Belarmino et al., 2021; Gavilan et al., 2021). The third domain regards the effective usage of Online food
the OFDS, and it is composed by the ease of app use and attitude toward using OFDS. delivery
Overall, by doing so, the paper offers significant theoretical and managerial contributions.
Theoretically, it enriches the paucity of literature focused on OFDS in the COVID-19 context
services
(Belarmino et al., 2021), especially by identifying the main antecedents leading to the
formation of the male and female customers’ intention to continue to use OFDS. Secondly, the
study focuses its attention on the analysis of costumers’ behaviours in adopting the online
technologies during a health crisis, thus enriching the extant literature mainly concentrated 1439
until now on other types of emergency situations (Kumar and Shah, 2021). Thirdly, it
contributes to the research dedicated to the analysis of the effects of the COVID-19 on the
dynamics of the world of retailing (Roggeveen and Sethuraman, 2021) by specifically
focusing on the catering sector.
At the managerial level, the paper attempts to (1) investigate how restaurants can offer
value to their customers through OFDS; (2) identify the most appropriate marketing and
communication strategies based on gender differences.
The remainder of the study is structured as follows: while Section 2 offers the literature review,
Section 3 presents the hypotheses development. Subsequently, Section 4 shows the methodology,
and Section 5 analyses the empirical results. Finally, Section 6 concludes the study by debating
the theoretical and managerial implications, limitations and directions for future research.
2. Literature review
This section first discusses the continuance intention conceptualization and its main
antecedents previously analysed by both the general literature and that focused on the OFDS
industry. The second part focuses its attention on the identification of the antecedents
investigated in the present contribution (i.e. perceived healthiness, perceived hygiene,
quarantine, fear of COVID-19, perceived risk of eating out, ease of app use and attitude), along
with the motivations that led to select them and their conceptualization.
3. Hypotheses development
3.1 Perceived healthiness, hygiene and quarantine procedures
By strongly influencing health conditions, both perceived healthiness and perceived hygiene
assume a key role in the formation of individuals’ decision making (Shim et al., 2021). In this
respect, several studies analysed the impact of food safety on consumers’ decision making
(Shim et al., 2021).
Focusing on healthiness, Kim et al. (2013) find that perceived food healthiness, by
increasing customers’ satisfaction, impacts on costumers’ revisit intention toward
restaurants. More recently, while Medina-Molina and Perez-Gonzalez (2021) analyse the Online food
relationship between perceived healthiness and repurchase intention in the context of delivery
nutritional labelling, Shim et al. (2021) investigate the positive impact of products’ healthiness
on customers’ purchase intention in coffee services.
services
Starting from these previous studies, it could be hypothesized an equivalent relationship
in the OFDS context, thus assuming that the products’ perceived healthiness, offered by an
OFDS, can have a positive impact on the customers’ intention to continue to use it. Therefore,
the first hypothesis has been formulated: 1441
H1. Perceived healthiness leads to continuance intention.
As regards hygiene, literature underlines how, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic,
customers have become increasingly attentive to the social distancing and hygiene
(Kazancoglu and Demir, 2021) since they are particularly concerned about the risk of having a
contact with contaminated food or infected delivery personnel. In this respect, OFDS
guarantee different sanitation procedures such as safety and hygiene measures in food
processing, handling and delivery, the adoption of contactless delivery, and electronical
payments (Al Amin et al., 2021).
From an empirical perspective, Al Amin et al. (2021) corroborate the positive impact of
food delivery hygiene on the continuance intention to use mobile food delivery applications
during the COVID-19 pandemic. Moreover, Shim et al. (2021) find a positive relationship
between hygiene and customers’ purchase intention in coffee services.
Based on these previous results, it could be assumed that there was a positive impact of
customers’ perceived hygiene concerning the OFDS on their continuance intention of using it. Thus:
H2. Perceived hygiene leads to continuance intention.
Moreover, with the advent of the COVID-19 pandemic, social life behaviours have profoundly
changed by especially influencing eating-out habits (Shim et al., 2021). In particular, people
have become ever more worried about the risk of being infected during eating and talking
moments. Therefore, quarantine procedures have currently assumed a crucial role in the
formation of customers’ satisfaction, especially in the context of the foodservice industry.
However, despite the relevance of these measures, just one study (Shim et al., 2021) has
analysed the impact of quarantine on consumers’ food behaviour and decision making in
coffee services, thus hypothesizing a positive impact of quarantine procedures on customers’
purchase intention. Starting from this study, we could assume a similar result in the OFDS
context by proposing the following hypothesis:
H3. Quarantine procedures lead to continuance intention.
3.2 Fear of COVID-19 and perceived risk of eating out during COVID-19
According to the extant research, fear of COVID-19 and the perceived risk of eating out have
brought individuals to assume new habits, behaviours and intentions (Halan, 2021; Rather,
2021; Tran, 2021), such as the inclination to prefer smaller networks of friends, more time
spent at home and the growing use of OFDS. Consequently, these services have become ever
more popular and adopted by consumers as the main substitute for dining out (Al Amin et al.,
2020; Belarmino et al., 2021).
Starting from these assumptions and from the fact that, generally, the customers’ adoption
and experience with a product/service can lead them to continue to adopt it (Chen and Yang,
2021), it could be assumed there would be a positive impact of the fear of COVID-19 and the
perceived risk of eating out during COVID-19 on customers’ intention of continuing to use OFDS.
Thus:
IJRDM H4. Fear of COVID-19 leads to continuance intention.
50,12 H5. Perceived risk of eating out leads to continuance intention.
3.3 Perceived ease of app use and attitude toward using OFDS
By specifically focusing on the OFDS context, some studies have analysed the influence of
perceived ease of app use on customers’ continuance intention. In particular, Fakfar (2021)
1442 corroborates that the ease of food delivery applications leads to customers’ satisfaction
which, in turn reveals their intention to re-use the service. In their study, Zhuang et al. (2021)
identify a positive relationship between ease of using food delivery apps and overall service
quality, customer satisfaction and continuance intention. Similarly, Choi (2020) finds a
positive impact of perceived ease of food delivery app use on customers’ satisfaction with the
delivery service which, in turn, leads to reuse intention.
Starting from these previous studies, it could be assumed that there was a positive impact
of perceived ease of OFDS apps use on customers’ intention of continuing to use these
services. Therefore, the following hypothesis has been postulated:
H6. Perceived ease of app use leads to continuance intention.
For what concerns the impact of attitude toward using OFDS on continuance intention,
research confirms this relationship in the context of COVID-19 also (Zhu et al., 2022).
However, the majority of it has analysed this connection in other sectors such as mobile
health applications (e.g. Birkmeyer et al., 2021), web-based videoconferencing and online
learning (e.g. Mo et al., 2021) and cruise services (e.g. Pan et al., 2021).
By specifically focusing on OFDS, Al Amin et al. (2021) and Troise et al. (2021) corroborate
a positive influence of the consumers’ attitude toward using online delivery services on their
intention to continue to adopt them. Based on these previous studies, we formulated the last
hypothesis:
H7. Attitude toward using OFDS leads to continuance intention.
4. Methodology
Data have been collected from 360 university students through the adoption of a web-based
self-completion survey. Based on the fact that (1) young people tend to shop online more than
other age groups (Lubis, 2018); (2) the most active customers of OFDS belong to young
segments (Just Eat, 2020; Tech, 2020), this specific target has been selected for the analysis.
Young people are defined to be under 29 years old [1]. Therefore, Italian university students
have been chosen since they are viewed as representative of people under 30 years old (Savelli
et al., 2019).
The translation–back-translation method was employed to conduct the survey in the
Italian language. Then, a professional platform for surveys (Google Form) has been adopted
for the survey administration.
In particular, in the first part of the survey, participants were asked to indicate a specific
OFDS brand they had used during the pandemic period. From that point on, participants
Figure 1.
Conceptual model
IJRDM were requested to respond to each question, always thinking about that specific service brand
50,12 they mentioned before.
Moreover, in order to avoid potential biases, several recommendations of MacKenzie and
Podsakof (2012) have been adopted. Firstly, to minimize social desirability bias, the complete
anonymity and confidentiality of responses have been guaranteed through a declaration
inserted in the introductory part of the online survey. Secondly, respondents have been
assured that there are no right or wrong responses and that they could have dissimilar
1444 opinions about the investigated topics. Finally, in the introductory part, it has been conveyed
to the participants to avoid any potential disturbance factors since some of the questions were
personal.
Overall, after eliminating incomplete responses and discarding respondents with a
uniform response style (V€olckner et al., 2010), we ended up with 360 valid responses. The
sample constituted 34% male respondents and 66% female respondents between 18 and
29 years. With a total of 360 respondents, the sample is above the rule of 200 and the sample to
item ratio is 12.4, which is higher than the acceptable ratio of 5:1 (Gorsuch, 1983). Thus, an
adequate sample size is achieved. Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) as well as Bartlett’s Test of
Sphericity to measure sampling adequacy are calculated. KMO is 0.873 (> than 0.5) and
Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity is significant at 0.000 (below p < 0.05), therefore, both values are
over the threshold and the data is suitable for factor analysis.
For the operationalization of the constructs, we employed existing and empirically
validated scales. Survey respondents were asked to indicate their level of agreement for each
of the items using a seven-point Likert scale, anchored by totally disagree (1) to totally agree
(7). Table A1 contains the complete list of the items, Cronbach’s alpha for each scale and the
source adopted for each construct.
5. Results
5.1 Validity and reliability tests
Several analyses were conducted to test our model. Exploratory factor analysis,
confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modelling are used to address the
hypotheses. Employing principal factor analysis showed that items measuring fear of
COVID-19 and perceived risk of eating out during COVID-19 loaded on a common factor.
Therefore, the two constructs were combined to one named “fear and risk of COVID”.
Items belonging to the constructs hygiene and quarantine also loaded on a common
factor. Thus, we combined them to a single factor named “hygiene and quarantine”.
Overall, the six resulting factors explain 75.5% cumulative variance. None of the 29 items
had significant cross-loadings (>0.50). All scales are reliable with Cronbach’s alpha
values higher than 0.8 (see Appendix).
The constructs’ convergent and discriminant validity was assessed through a confirmatory
factor analysis. Average variance extracted (AVE) and composite reliability (CR) form
convergent validity. To obtain convergent and discriminant validity, the AVE should be > 0.40
(Floyd and Widaman, 1995) and the CR > 0.60 (Bagozzi and Yi, 1988). AVE values are between
0.56 (fear and risk of COVID) and 0.85 (ease of app use) and CR values range between 0.88
(healthiness) and 0.94 (ease of app use). Thus, all AVE and CR values are acceptable.
Discriminant validity is established by comparing AVE values need with the squared
inter-construct correlation estimates (SIC). Details for means and standard deviations of the
constructs, as well as AVE, CR and SIC values, are displayed in Table 1.
We also tested for significant differences between women and men on our variables in the
model. Only one significant difference is found for fear and risk of COVID-19 (t(357) 5 7.05,
p < 0.001). Women (m 5 3.98; SD 5 1.39) have a higher fear and risk perception of COVID-19
than men (m 5 2.94; SD 5 1.28).
5.2 Fit of the measurement model Online food
The measurement model was tested to determine its fit to the research data. Test of the fit of delivery
the measurement model (for male and female consumers) indicates that the measurement
model has an acceptable fit (χ 2 5 1362.37; df 5 702; p < 0.001; χ 2/df 5 1.94; CFI 5 0.93;
services
IFI 5 0.93; TLI 5 0.92; RMSEA 5 0.051). Hence, our measurement model possesses
configural invariance.
For a meaningful comparison of the model for both male and female consumers,
the instrument measuring the various constructs must possess cross-gender 1445
equivalence. To meet the requirement of equivalence, configural and, at least
partial, metric or scalar invariances must be confirmed to compare the findings for the
two groups of consumers (Hair et al., 2006; Vandenberg and Lance, 2000; Steenkamp
and Baumgartner, 1998).
Metric invariance was tested by means of multiple-group SEM. For the model there is no
significant difference in χ 2 between the free and the restricted model (i.e. factor loadings
restricted to being equal across genders). Thus, metric invariance can be assumed.
CR AVE SIC
Construct Mean (SD) (>0.60) (>0.40) 1 2 3 4 5
Figure 2.
Results of the model
Note
1. Eurostat, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/youth
2. http://ustat.miur.it/dati/didattica/italia/atenei
References Online food
Ahrenfeldt, L.J., Otavova, M., Christensen, K. and Lindahl-Jacobsen, R. (2021), “Sex and age delivery
differences in COVID-19 mortality in Europe”, Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift, Vol. 133 No. 7,
pp. 393-398.
services
Al Amin, M., Arefin, M.S., Sultana, N., Islam, M.R., Jahan, I. and Akhtar, A. (2020), “Evaluating the
customers’ dining attitudes, e-satisfaction and continuance intention toward mobile food
ordering apps (MFOAs): evidence from Bangladesh”, European Journal of Management and
Business Economics, Vol. 30 No. 2, pp. 211-229. 1451
Al Amin, M., Arefin, M.S., Alam, M.R., Ahammad, T. and Hoque, M.R. (2021), “Using mobile food
delivery applications during COVID-19 pandemic: an extended model of planned behavior”,
Journal of Food Products Marketing, Vol. 27 No. 2, pp. 105-126.
Ali, S., Khalid, N., Javed, H.M.U. and Islam, D.M. (2021), “Consumer adoption of online food delivery
ordering (OFDO) services in Pakistan: the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic situation”, Journal
of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, Vol. 7 No. 1, p. 10.
Alt, M.A., Saplacan, Z., Benedek, B. and Nagy, B.Z. (2021), “Digital touchpoints and multichannel
segmentation approach in the life insurance industry”, International Journal of Retail and
Distribution Management, Vol. 49 No. 5, pp. 652-677.
Assimakopoulos, C., Antoniadis, I., Kayas, O.G. and Dvizac, D. (2017), “Effective social media
marketing strategy: facebook as an opportunity for universities”, International Journal of Retail
and Distribution Management, Vol. 45 No. 5, pp. 532-549.
Bagozzi, R.P. and Yi, Y. (1988), “On the evaluation of structural equation models”, Journal of the
Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 16 No. 1, pp. 74-94.
Belarmino, A., Raab, C., Tang, J. and Han, W. (2021), “Exploring the motivations to use online meal
delivery platforms: before and during quarantine”, International Journal of Hospitality
Management, Vol. 96, p. 102983.
Bhatt, K. (2022), “Adoption of online streaming services: moderating role of personality traits”,
International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, Vol. 50 No. 4, pp. 437-457.
Birkmeyer, S., Wirtz, B.W. and Langer, P.F. (2021), “Determinants of mHealth success: an empirical
investigation of the user perspective”, International Journal of Information Management,
Vol. 59, p. 102351.
Castillo, S., M.J. and Bigne, E. (2021), “A model of adoption of AR-based self-service technologies: a
two country comparison”, International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, Vol. 49
No. 7, pp. 875-898.
Chen, N. and Yang, Y. (2021), “The impact of customer experience on consumer purchase intention in
cross-border E-commerce——taking network structural embeddedness as mediator variable”,
Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Vol. 59, p. 102344.
Cheng, Y.M. (2020), “Quality antecedents and performance outcome of cloud-based hospital
information system continuance intention”, Journal of Enterprise Information Management,
Vol. 33 No. 3, pp. 654-683.
Choi, J.C. (2020), “User familiarity and satisfaction with food delivery mobile apps”, Sage Open, Vol. 10
No. 4, pp. 1-10.
Daneji, A.A., Ayub, A.F.M. and Khambari, M.N.M. (2019), “The effects of perceived usefulness,
confirmation and satisfaction on continuance intention in using massive open online course
(MOOC)”, Knowledge Management and E-Learning, Vol. 11 No. 2, pp. 201-214.
Demoulin, N.T.M. and Djelassi, S. (2016), “An integrated model of self-service technology (SST) usage
in a retail context”, International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, Vol. 44 No. 5,
pp. 540-559.
Dirsehan, T. and Cankat, E. (2021), “Role of mobile food-ordering applications in developing
restaurants’ brand satisfaction and loyalty in the pandemic period”, Journal of Retailing and
Consumer Services, Vol. 62, p. 102608.
IJRDM Erjavec, J. and Manfreda, A. (2022), “Online shopping adoption during COVID-19 and social isolation:
extending the UTAUT model with herd behavior”, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services,
50,12 Vol. 65, 102867.
Eugene Cheng-Xi, A.W., Basha, N.K. and Imm, N.S. (2018), “The impact of service personal values on
continuance intention towards on-demand ridesharing services”, International Journal of
Economics and Management, Vol. 12 No. 2, pp. 473-483.
Fakfar, P. (2021), “Influence of service attributes of food delivery application on customers’
1452 satisfaction and their behavioural responses: the IPMA approach”, International Journal of
Gastronomy and Food Science, Vol. 25, p. 100392.
Faqih, K.M. and Jaradat, M.I.R.M. (2015), “Assessing the moderating effect of gender differences and
individualism-collectivism at individual-level on the adoption of mobile commerce technology:
TAM3 perspective”, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Vol. 22, pp. 37-52.
Floyd, F.J. and Widaman, K.F. (1995), “Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical
assessment instruments”, Psychological Assessment, Vol. 7 No. 3, pp. 286-299.
Gavilan, D., Balderas-Cejudo, A., Fernandez-Lores, S. and Martinez-Navarro, G. (2021), “Innovation in
online food delivery: learnings from COVID-19”, International Journal of Gastronomy and Food
Science, Vol. 24, p. 100330.
Gorsuch, R.L. (1983), Factor Analysis, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
Gunden, N., Morosan, C. and DeFranco, A. (2020), “Consumers’ intentions to use online food delivery
systems in the USA”, International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, Vol. 32
No. 3, pp. 1325-1345.
Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B. and Anderson, R. (2006), Multivariate Data Analysis, 6th ed., Prentice Hall
International, NJ.
Halan, D. (2021), “E-tailers adaptation during early stages of “social distancing causing crises”: an
exploratory study”, International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, Vol. 49 No. 11,
pp. 1554-1570.
Hamari, J. (2015), “Why do people buy virtual goods? Attitude toward virtual good purchases versus game
enjoyment”, International Journal of Information Management, Vol. 35 No. 3, pp. 299-308.
Hong, C., Choi, H.H., Choi, E.K.C. and Joung, H.W.D. (2021), “Factors affecting customer intention to
use online food delivery services before and during the COVID-19 pandemic”, Journal of
Hospitality and Tourism Management, Vol. 48, pp. 509-518.
Hwang, J. and Kim, H. (2019), “Consequences of a green image of drone food delivery services: the
moderating role of gender and age”, Business Strategy and the Environment, Vol. 28 No. 5, pp. 872-884.
Hwang, J. and Kim, H. (2021), “The effects of expected benefits on image, desire, and behavioral
intentions in the field of drone food delivery services after the outbreak of COVID-19”,
Sustainability, Vol. 13 No. 1, p. 117.
Hwang, J., Lee, J.S. and Kim, H. (2019), “Perceived innovativeness of drone food delivery services and
its impacts on attitude and behavioral intentions: the moderating role of gender and age”,
International Journal of Hospitality Management, Vol. 81, pp. 94-103.
Iliescu, D. (2017), Adapting Tests in Linguistic and Cultural Situations, Cambridge University Press,
Cambridge.
Iranmanesh, M., Moghavvemi, S., Zailani, S. and Hyun, S.S. (2018), “The role of trust and religious
commitment in Islamic medical tourism”, Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, Vol. 23
No. 3, pp. 245-259.
Jian, Y., Yu, I.Y., Yang, M.X. and Zeng, K.J. (2020), “The impacts of fear and uncertainty of COVID-19
on environmental concerns, brand trust, and behavioral intentions toward green hotels”,
Sustainability, Vol. 12 No. 20, pp. 1-14.
Jun, K., Yoon, B., Lee, S. and Lee, D.S. (2022), “Factors influencing customer decisions to use online
food delivery service during the COVID-19 pandemic”, Foods, Vol. 11 No. 1, pp. 64-79.
Just Eat (2020), “Osservatorio nazionale sul mercato del cibo a domicilio online in Italia 2020”, available at: Online food
https://www.justeat.it/CmsAssets/media/Images/Blogs/IT/quarto-osservatorio-just-eat/REPORT-
MAPPA-DEL-CIBO-A-DOMICILIO-IN-ITALIA_2020.pdf?bid5f1d4967b66e7435e917216287b58eb71 delivery
(accessed 24 July 2021). services
Kapoor, A.P. and Vij, M. (2018), “Technology at the dinner table: ordering food online through mobile
apps”, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Vol. 43, pp. 342-351.
Kartono, R. and Tjahjadi, J.K. (2021), “Factors affecting consumers’ intentions to use online food delivery
services during COVID-19 outbreak in Jabodetabek area”, The Winners, Vol. 22 No. 1, pp. 1-14. 1453
Kazancoglu, I. and Demir, B. (2021), “Analysing flow experience on repurchase intention in e-retailing
during COVID-19”, International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, Vol. 49 No. 11,
pp. 1571-1593.
Kim, H.J., Park, J., Kim, M.J. and Ryu, K. (2013), “Does perceived restaurant food healthiness
matter? Its influence on value, satisfaction and revisit intentions in restaurant operations
in South Korea”, International Journal of Hospitality Management, Vol. 33, pp. 397-405.
Kumar, S. and Shah, A. (2021), “Revisiting food delivery apps during COVID-19 pandemic? Investigating
the role of emotions”, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Vol. 62, p. 102595.
Leon, S. (2018), “Service mobile apps: a millennial generation perspective”, Industrial Management and
Data Systems, Vol. 118 No. 9, pp. 1837-1860.
Li, C.Y. and Fang, Y.H. (2019), “Predicting continuance intention toward mobile branded apps through
satisfaction and attachment”, Telematics and Informatics, Vol. 43, p. 101248.
Liaw, S.S. (2002), “Understanding user perceptions of World-wide web environments”, Journal of
Computer Assisted Learning, Vol. 18 No. 2, pp. 137-148.
Lubis, A.N. (2018), “Evaluating the customer preferences of online shopping: demographic factors and
online shop application issue”, Academy of Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 17
No. 2, pp. 1-13.
Luo, Y. and Ye, Q. (2019), “The effects of online reviews, perceived value, and gender on continuance
intention to use international online outshopping website: an elaboration likelihood model
perspective”, Journal of International Consumer Marketing, Vol. 31 No. 3, pp. 250-269.
MacKenzie, S.B. and Podsakof, P.M. (2012), “Common method bias in marketing: causes, mechanisms,
and procedural remedies”, Journal of Retailing, Vol. 88 No. 4, pp. 542-555.
Medina-Molina, C. and Perez-Gonzalez, B. (2021), “Nutritional labelling and purchase intention
interaction of interpretative food labels with consumers’ beliefs and decisions”, British Food
Journal, Vol. 123 No. 2, pp. 754-770.
Mew, J. and Millan, E. (2021), “Mobile wallets: key drivers and deterrents of consumers’ intention to adopt”,
The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, Vol. 31 No. 2, pp. 182-210.
Mo, C.Y., Hsieh, T.H., Lin, C.L., Jin, Y.Q. and Su, Y.S. (2021), “Exploring the critical factors, the online learning
continuance usage during COVID-19 pandemic”, Sustainability, Vol. 13 No. 10, p. 5471.
Naeem, M. (2021), “Understanding the customer psychology of impulse buying during COVID-19
pandemic: implications for retailers”, International Journal of Retail and Distribution
Management, Vol. 49 No. 3, pp. 377-393.
Okazaki, S., Eisend, M., Plangger, K., de Ruyter, K. and Grewal, D. (2020), “Understanding the
strategic consequences of customer privacy concerns: a meta-analytic review”, Journal of
Retailing, Vol. 96 No. 4, pp. 458-473.
Pan, T., Shu, F., Kitterlin-Lynch, M. and Beckman, E. (2021), “Perceptions of cruise travel during the
COVID-19 pandemic: market recovery strategies for cruise businesses in North America”,
Tourism Management, Vol. 85, p. 104275.
Patsiotis, A., Atik, M. and Perrea, T. (2020), “The influence of m-marketing tools on consumer buying
process: evidence from the dining sector”, International Journal of Retail and Distribution
Management, Vol. 48 No. 10, pp. 1037-1056.
IJRDM Patzer, B., Chaparro, B. and Keebler, J.R. (2020), “Developing a model of video game play: motivations,
satisfactions, and continuance intentions”, Simulation and Gaming, Vol. 51 No. 3, pp. 287-309.
50,12
Peng, C. (2019), Does e-commerce reduce traffic congestion? Evidence from alibaba single day
shopping event, CEP Discussion Papers dp1646, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
Petit, O., Javornik, A. and Velasco, C. (2022), “We eat first with our (digital) eyes: enhancing mental
simulation of eating experiences via visual-enabling technologies”, Journal of Retailing, Vol. 98
No. 2, pp. 277-293.
1454
Powers, T.L., Jack, E.P. and Choi, S. (2018), “Price and quality value influences on retail customer
satisfaction and loyalty”, Journal of Consumer Satisfaction, Dissatisfaction and Complaining
Behavior, Vol. 31, pp. 21-39.
Prasetyo, Y.T., Tanto, H., Mariyanto, M., Hanjaya, C., Young, M.N., Persada, S.F., Miraja, B.A. and
Redi, A.A.N.P. (2021), “Factors affecting customer satisfaction and loyalty in online food
delivery service during the covid-19 pandemic: its relation with open innovation”, Journal of
Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, Vol. 7 No. 1, p. 76.
Prentice, C., Chen, J. and Stantic, B. (2020), “Timed intervention in COVID-19 and panic buying”,
Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Vol. 57, p. 102203.
Puthur, J.K., George, A.P. and Mahadevan, L. (2020), “Understanding citizen’s continuance intention to
use e-government services: the case of the Indian railway e-ticket booking site”, International
Journal of Business Information Systems, Vol. 34 No. 2, pp. 183-203.
Qing, T. and Haiying, D. (2021), “How to achieve consumer continuance intention toward branded
apps—from the consumer–brand engagement perspective”, Journal of Retailing and Consumer
Services, Vol. 60, p. 102486.
Rahi, S. and Abd Ghani, M. (2019), “Integration of expectation confirmation theory and self-
determination theory in internet banking continuance intention”, Journal of Science and
Technology Policy Management, Vol. 10 No. 3, pp. 533-550.
Rather, R.A. (2021), “Demystifying the effects of perceived risk and fear on customer engagement, co-
creation and revisit intention during COVID-19: a protection motivation theory approach”,
Journal of Destination Marketing and Management, Vol. 20, p. 100564.
Reply (2021), “Una nuova spinta verso la digitalizzazione del settore F&B (Food and Beverage)”,
available at: https://www.reply.com/it/content/una-nuova-spinta-verso-la-digitalizzazione-del-
settore-fandb-food-and-beverage (accessed 20 July 2021).
Roggeveen, A.L. and Sethuraman, R. (2020), “Customer-interfacing retail technologies in 2020 & beyond:
an integrative framework and research directions”, Journal of Retailing, Vol. 96 No. 3, pp. 299-309.
Rosenbaum, M.S. and Russell-Bennett, R. (2020), “Editorial: service research in the new (post-COVID)
marketplace”, Journal of Services Marketing, Vol. 34 No. 5, pp. 1-5.
Saad, A.T. (2021), “Factors affecting online food delivery service in Bangladesh: an empirical study”,
British Food Journal, Vol. 123 No. 2, pp. 535-550.
Savelli, E., Bravi, L., Murmura, F. and Pencarelli, T. (2019), “Understanding the consumption of
traditional-local foods through the experience perspective: the case of the truffle”, British Food
Journal, Vol. 121 No. 6, pp. 1261-1280.
uler, M., Fee Maier, M. and Liljedal, K.T. (2020), “Motives and barriers affecting consumers’ co-
Sch€
creation in the physical store”, The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer
Research, Vol. 30 No. 3, pp. 289-310.
Seghezzi, A. and Mangiaracina, R. (2021), “On-demand food delivery: investigating the economic
performances”, International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, Vol. 49 No. 4, pp. 531-549.
Shankar, V., Kalyanam, K., Setia, P., Golmohammadi, A., Tirunillai, S., Douglass, T. and Waddoups, R.
(2021), “How technology is changing retail”, Journal of Retailing, Vol. 97 No. 1, pp. 13-27.
Shim, J., Moon, J., Song, M. and Lee, W.S. (2021), “Antecedents of purchase intention at Starbucks in
the context of covid-19 pandemic”, Sustainability, Vol. 13 No. 4, p. 1758.
Steenkamp, J.B.E. and Baumgartner, H. (1998), “Assessing measurement invariance in cross-national Online food
consumer research”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 25 No. 1, pp. 78-90.
delivery
Tech, J.E.T. (2020), “The influence of online food delivery service quality on customer satisfaction and
customer loyalty: the role of personal innovativeness”, Journal of Environmental Treatment
services
Techniques, Vol. 8 No. 1, pp. 6-12.
Thomas-Francois, K. and Somogyi, S. (2022), “Consumers’ intention to adopt virtual grocery shopping:
do technological readiness and the optimisation of consumer learning matter?”, International
Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, Vol. 50 No. 5, pp. 638-657. 1455
Tran, L.T.T. (2021), “Managing the effectiveness of e-commerce platforms in a pandemic”, Journal of
Retailing and Consumer Services, Vol. 58, p. 102287.
Troise, C., O’Driscoll, A., Tani, M. and Prisco, A. (2021), “Online food delivery services and behavioural
intention – a test of an integrated TAM and TPB framework”, British Food Journal, Vol. 123
No. 2, pp. 664-683.
Tsichla, E., Hatzithomas, L. and Boutsouki, C. (2016), “Gender differences in the interpretation of web
atmospherics: a selectivity hypothesis approach”, Journal of Marketing Communications,
Vol. 22 No. 6, pp. 563-586.
Untaru, E.N. and Han, H. (2021), “Protective measures against COVID-19 and the business strategies
of the retail enterprises: differences in gender, age, education, and income among shoppers”,
Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Vol. 60, p. 102446.
Van Dolen, W.M., Dabholkar, P.A. and De Ruyter, K. (2007), “Satisfaction with online commercial
group chat: the influence of perceived technology attributes, chat group characteristics, and
advisor communication style”, Journal of Retailing, Vol. 83 No. 3, pp. 339-358.
Vandenberg, R. and Lance, C. (2000), “A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance
literature: suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research”,
Organizational Research Methods, Vol. 3 No. 1, pp. 4-70.
V€olckner, F., Sattler, H., Hennig-Thurau, T. and Ringle, C.M. (2010), “The role of parent brand quality
for service brand extension success”, Journal of Service Research, Vol. 13 No. 4, pp. 379-396.
Wang, M.M. and Wang, J.J. (2019), “Understanding solvers’ continuance intention in crowdsourcing
contest platform: an extension of expectation-confirmation model”, Journal of Theoretical and
Applied Electronic Commerce Research, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 17-33.
Wiese, M. and Humbani, M. (2020), “Exploring technology readiness for mobile payment app users”, The
International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, Vol. 30 No. 2, pp. 123-142.
Yeo, V.C.S., Goh, S.K. and Rezaei, S. (2017), “Consumer experiences, attitude and behavioral intention
toward online food delivery (OFD) services”, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services,
Vol. 35, pp. 150-162.
Zhao, F., Sun, J., Devasagayam, R. and Clendenen, G. (2018), “Effects of culture and financial literacy
among Chinese-Americans on participating in financial services”, Journal of Financial Services
Marketing, Vol. 23 No. 1, pp. 62-75.
Zhou, W., Tsiga, Z., Li, B., Zheng, S. and Jiang, S. (2018), “What influence users’ e-finance continuance
intention? The moderating role of trust”, Industrial Management and Data Systems, Vol. 118
No. 8, pp. 1647-1670.
Zhu, B., Charoennan, W. and Embalzado, H. (2022), “The influence of perceived risks on millennials’
intention to use m-payment for mobile shopping in Bangkok”, International Journal of Retail
and Distribution Management, Vol. 50 No. 4, pp. 479-497.
Zhuang, X., Lin, L., Zhang, R., Li, J.(J.). and He, B. (2021), “e-service quality perceptions of millennials
and non-millennials on O2O delivery applications”, British Food Journal, Vol. 123 No. 12,
pp. 4116-4134.
Zulauf, K., Cechella, F.S. and Wagner, R. (2021), “The bidirectionality of buying behavior and risk
perception: an exploratory study”, The International Review of Retail, Distribution and
Consumer Research, Vol. 31 No. 5, pp. 566-590.
IJRDM Appendix
50,12
Cronbach
Constructs α Main sources
For instructions on how to order reprints of this article, please visit our website:
www.emeraldgrouppublishing.com/licensing/reprints.htm
Or contact us for further details: [email protected]