SC Revision Template 2-1-3
SC Revision Template 2-1-3
One study investigating the Sherif et al (1954) Sherif et al. explored the relationship
individual and the group between individuals and groups to
analyze how group identity affects
individuals. Their research demonstrated
that in situations where groups competed
for resources, conflict arose among
individuals from opposing groups, leading
to increased loyalty to one's own in-
group.
How social groups influence the Sherif et al (1954) Sherif illustrated the influence of social
individual and the group groups on both individuals and the
collective by assigning identities to the
boys involved in the study within their
respective groups. Placed in varied
situations, these boys were encouraged
to behave in ways that would benefit
their team in acquiring essential
resources. Additionally, the introduction
of prizes aimed to further incentivize
behavioral changes among the
participants.
Social identity theory Tajfel et al (1971) Tajfel's work reinforced the social identity
SOCIOCULTURAL APPROACH REVISION GRID
One study investigating social Tajfel et al (1971) Tajfel explored the Social Identity Theory
identity theory by dividing the boys into two groups and
instructing them to distribute money
among unfamiliar members within their
own team and the opposing group.
Tajfel's findings revealed that individuals
displayed a bias toward their own group
and exhibited discrimination against the
other group due to a stronger
identification with their specific group.
Social cognitive theory Bandura, Ross and The children acquired knowledge through
Ross (1961) – Bobo adults using vicarious learning and
Doll through models via observational
learning. Moreover, a stronger
identification with the model can
enhance the probability of imitating the
observed behavior.
One study investigating social Bandura, Ross and Children acquired knowledge by
cognitive theory Ross (1961) – Bobo observing adults through vicarious
Doll learning and by observing models
through observational learning.
Furthermore, greater identification with
the model can heighten the probability of
imitating the observed behavior.
discriminatory attitudes.
One study investigating the Park and Rothbart The research examined three analogous
development (formation) of (1982) sororities, illustrating how affiliation with
stereotypes an in-group could result in the out-group
homogeneity effect. Moreover, it
demonstrated an in-group bias when
participants rated their own sorority
more positively compared to the others.
One effect of stereotypes Park and Rothbart Park and the study revealed that the out-
(1982) group homogeneity effect led sororities
to perceive opposing sororities as more
alike, fostering increased stereotyping.
Consequently, negative perceptions of
other sororities and perceiving them as
indistinguishable could lead to prejudice,
paving the way for discrimination and
intergroup conflict.
One study investigating one effect Chiu et al (2009) Chiu et al. studied the impact of
of stereotypes stereotypes by examining whether
exposure to a different culture would
lead to an increase in stereotypes about
one's own culture. The findings indicated
that exposure to another culture
heightened individuals' awareness of
their own cultural heritage.
In other words, if the SAQ asks you to outline/describe/explain a cognitive process, theory or model, start with that and
make it the main focus of the SAQ, and if you are asked to outline/describe/explain a study, start with that and make it the
main focus of the SAQ. From now on, this list will not include the ‘outline/describe/explain one study’ prompt.
influenced them.
One example of culture and its BErry (1967) – Cross Berry examined the impact of culture on
influence on behaviour and cultural behavior and cognition by studying the
cognition Inuit and Temne tribes, representing
hunter-gatherers and farmers,
respectively. The findings indicated that
the Temne relied heavily on cooperation
for survival, whereas the Inuits displayed
more individualistic tendencies.
One effect of cultural group Bond and Smith Bond and Smith demonstrated that
membership on behaviour and (1997) belonging to a cultural group significantly
cognition influences an individual's tendency to
conform. Through their investigation
using the Asch paradigm across 17
countries, they established how cultural
belonging affects behavior, specifically in
terms of conformity.
The influence of one cultural Ogihara and Uchida Ogihara and Uchida highlighted the
dimension on behaviour and (2014) impact of the cultural dimension of
cognition individualism versus collectivism on
Japanese women employed in an
individualistic work environment. Their
findings indicated that individuals
oriented towards achievement within this
setting tended to have fewer intimate
friendships and experienced a lower
quality of life.
CULTURAL INFLUENCES ON INDIVIDUAL BEHAVIOUR
One research method (approach Barry et al (1959) This study adopted a correlational
to research) used when design due to the inability to
investigating cultural influences on randomly assign or alter cultural
individual behaviour conditions, as culture naturally exists.
The focus was on examining the
associations between economic
systems and child-rearing practices,
investigating the methods used on
children and the types of values and
norms that were encouraged within
these practices.
One ethical consideration of Barry et al (1959) An ethical aspect was the absence of
research into cultural influences potential harm since there were only
on individual behaviour observations made without any
experimental conditions. Moreover,
participant anonymity was maintained
throughout the study.
One cultural influence on Berry’s Cross- Berry demonstrated the cultural impact
individual behaviour Cultural Study (1967) on individual behavior by examining how
the acquisition of resources influences
individualistic and collectivist tendencies.
SOCIOCULTURAL APPROACH REVISION GRID
Research (studies) into social Bandura, Ross and Bandura, Ross, and Ross (1961)
cognitive theory Ross (1961) conducted a seminal study on social
cognitive theory, examining different
conditions to assess its applicability. Their
research revealed that children were
Charlton et al (2000) more inclined to imitate behaviors
exhibited by same-gender models.
Berry (1967)
Berry's research examined two tribes and
their distinct resource-gathering
methods, shedding light on why certain
individuals are more inclined toward
cooperation while others tend towards
individualistic behaviors in their actions.
This study illuminated the influence of
culture on behavioral tendencies related
to resource acquisition.
One or more cultural dimension Ogihara and Uchida Ogihara and Uchida's (2014) research
and its influence on behaviour and (2014) highlighted the impact of the cultural
cognition dimension of individualism versus
Berry (1967) collectivism on behavior and cognition.
Their study focused on Japanese women
working in individualistic companies
despite their traditional collectivist
values. It revealed that those who
embraced individualism exhibited lower
levels of well-being and had fewer close
friendships, indicating the influence of
cultural norms on social connections and
mental health.
Ethical considerations of research Barry et al (1959) An ethical aspect of the study involved
into cultural influences on avoiding potential harm since there were
individual behaviour no imposed conditions; only observations
Berry’s Cross- were made. Additionally, participant
Cultural Study (1967) anonymity was maintained throughout
the study.