School Principal Leadership Style and Teachers' Individual Performance Commitment and Review (IPCR) in Antipolo City Senior High School
School Principal Leadership Style and Teachers' Individual Performance Commitment and Review (IPCR) in Antipolo City Senior High School
In the context Philippine education, DepEd Order No. This research sets in Antipolo City Senior High School
1, series of 2003 defines ‘school head’ as the person (ACSHS) where the researcher employs convenience
responsible for the supervision in terms of sampling technique in choosing the participants of this
administrative and instructional aspects of the school. study. These 43 individuals comprise of teachers,
He or she may be assisted by an assistant school head master teachers and subject group heads. There were
who, shall be both an instructional leader and 28 respondents who participated in this study
administrative manager. Along with this are the corresponding to 65.11% return rate.
authority, accountability, and responsibility of the
school head which primarily include setting the goals, Instruments of the Study
providing conducive environment, implementing the
curriculum, developing and introducing innovative This research uses structured instrument which
programs, projects and activities, administering, contains two parts. The first part is the demographic
managing, and recommending staff complement to the profile of the respondents such as gender, age, highest
needs, and establishing school culture to name a few. educational attainment, area of specialization, years in
service, current position, along with the latest IPCRF
Research Questions rating. The said rating is evaluated using teachers’
performance as observed in key results areas (KRAs)
This study primarily aims to identify how the in terms of (1) Content Knowledge and Pedagogy, (2)
leadership styles of the school head correlate to Learning Environment & Diversity of Learners, (3)
teachers’ annual performance as reflected in their Curriculum and Planning, (4) Assessment and
IPCRF. More specifically, it sought answers to the Reporting, (5) Personal Growth and Professional
following questions: Development, and (6) Plus Factor.
1. What is the demographic profile of the respondents The second part is adopted from Imhangbe et al.
in terms of: (2018) that assesses school principal leadership styles
1.1 Sex; namely (1) autocratic, (2) democratic, and (3) laissez-
1.2 Age; faire. Originally, this instrument contains choices like
1.3 Highest Educational Attainment; “always, sometimes, and never”. The researcher
1.4 Area of Specialization; modified the choices with a 4-point Likert scale of
1.5 Years in Service; and
strongly agree, agree, disagree, and strongly disagree
1.6 Current Position or item?
while retaining all dimensions which contain 3
2. What is the level of performance of the teachers as
statements. This combined instrument is named as
reflected in IPCRF?
“Survey Questionnaire on School Principal Leadership
3. What leadership style in Antipolo City Senior High
Style and Teachers’ Individual Performance
School is perceived by the teachers?
Commitment and Review (IPCR)”.
4. What relationship exists between the school
principal leadership style and teachers’ performance?
Ethical Considerations
Demographic Profile of the Respondents IPCRF Rating. Among the 28 respondents, 25 (89.3%)
of the teachers had an outstanding performance of 4.50
Gender. Out of 28 respondents, 21 (75%) were – 5.00, while there were 3 (10.7%) of the respondents
female, and 7 (25%) were the males. The teaching who had a very satisfactory performance (3.50 – 4.49)
population of Antipolo City Senior High School was during the rating period SY 2021-2022. This clearly
majority composed of female teachers. indicated very high performance of the teachers of
Antipolo City Senior High School.
Age. Out of 28 respondents, there were 7 (25%) who
were 45-49 years old, 5 (17.9%) who were 25-29 years Perceived Leadership Style
old, while there was a similar number of respondents
in each who were 50 years old and above, 40-44, Autocratic Leadership. The statement 1 ‘School
35-39, and 30-34 years old (14.3%) respectively. The principal allocates the tasks without teacher’s will’
age distribution of the respondents was almost evenly generated a mean score of 2.71 with a descriptive
distributed. interpretation of agree, statement 2 ‘School principal
decides solely without including teachers’ inputs’
Highest Educational Attainment. Among the 28 generated a mean score of 2.32 (agree), and statement
respondents, there were 4 (14.3%) who were Doctorate 3 ‘Performance standards and expectations are set
Degree Holder, 6 (21.4%) who were Doctorate Degree solely for teachers to accomplish’ generated a mean
Units Earner, 10 (35.7%) who were Master’s Degree score of 2.57 (agree), respectively. The dimension of
Holder, 4 (14.3%) who were Master’s Degree Units autocratic leadership had an average mean of 2.54.
Earner, and another 4 (14.3%) who were Bachelor
Degree Holder. Majority of the respondents possessed Democratic Leadership. The statement 1 ‘School
graduate and post-graduate studies as required by the principal accepts the suggestions of teachers about
department in the teaching in senior high school. policies and plans’ generated a mean score of 2.96
(agree) statement 2 ‘School principal shares plans
Area of Specialization. Out of 28 respondents, there regarding school activities with teachers prior to
were 13 (46.4%) who were HUMSS (Humanities and implementation’ with a mean score of 2.93 (agree),
Social Sciences) teachers, 12 (42.9%) who were and statement 3 ‘School principal provides sociable
STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and relationships between staff members’, had 3.07
Mathematics) teachers, and there were 3 who were (agree), respectively. The dimension of democratic
Technical-Vocational teachers. leadership had an average mean of 2.99.
Years in Service. There were 8 (28.6%) respondents Laissez-Faire Leadership. The statement 1 ‘School
out of 28 who were in the service for 1 to 5 years, 6 principal does take a little concern in daily activities as
respondents (21.4%) who were in the service for 6 to well as proceedings’ generated a mean score of 2.54
10 years, another 6 who were in for 21 to 25 years, 5 (agree), statement 2 ‘School principal gives a little
respondents who were in for 11 to 15 years, 2 direction to teachers in classroom’ had a mean score of
respondents for 16 to 20 years, and 1 respondent who 2.89 (agree), and statement 3 ‘School principal seldom
were in the service for 26 years and above. Because of assists teachers to deal with work problems’ had 2.79
the increasing number of students in Antipolo City (agree), respectively. The dimension laissez-faire
Senior High School, the demand for additional leadership had an average mean of 2.74.
teachers also increases. Thus, the teacher population of
the said school primarily composed of additional Variety of researchers discussed that there is a clear
teachers who were in the service for 1 to 5 years. manifestation how leadership styles can greatly
influence employees’ performance. In this present
Current Position or Item. Out of 28 respondents, study, the researcher gathered data through survey
there were 10 respondents (35.7%) who were Master questionnaire that measured the perceived leadership
Teacher II, 4 (14.3%) who were Master Teacher I, 3 style of the school principal such as autocratic,
(10.7%) Teacher III, 7 (25%) Teacher II, and 4 democratic, and laissez-faire. Findings revealed that