The Implementation of Artificial Intelligence Chat
The Implementation of Artificial Intelligence Chat
Article history
Received Revised Accepted Published
19 June 2023 17 July 2023 26 26 October 2023 31 October 2023
ABSTRACT
The primary aim of this research is to incorporate the use of Artificial Intelligence, ChatGPT, and the Critical
Thinking Method to enhance academic endeavors. Employing Artificial Intelligence and ChatGPT in academic
work offers advantages to educators and students. Although educators and students are still required to verify
data and references independently, the use of Artificial Intelligence and ChatGPT enables the quick and precise
presentation of information. Therefore, it is essential to integrate the Critical Thinking methodology with the
utilization of ChatGPT and Artificial Intelligence. Verifying and validating data improves the credibility of the
knowledge acquired by both professors and students. The research methodology employed in this project involved
library research, where the author collected primary and secondary data. Subsequently, content analysis
methodology was applied, and the data was presented descriptively. The study results indicate that the
implementation of Artificial Intelligence, ChatGPT, and the Critical Thinking method has enhanced the quality of
academic work produced by educators and students. Furthermore, this combination can expedite the production
of scholarly articles. When engaging in academic research, educators and students should adhere to the guidelines
on Artifact Intelligence and ChatGPT policies.
Keywords: implementing artificial intelligence, chatGPT; critical thinking method, academic endeavors,
educators and students
Citation Style (APA): Marbun, T. (2023). The Implementation of Artificial Intelligence, Chatgpt, And Critical
Thinking Method for Academic Endeavors at Theological Higher Education. Journal Didaskalia, 6(2), 84-100.
https://doi.org/10.33856/didaskalia.v6i2.309
INTRODUCTION
The completion of academic assignments can pose challenges for each student. Academic endeavors
encompass paperwork, research, and culminating projects like the thesis and dissertation. The challenges in this
context pertain to effective time management, a comprehensive understanding of the topic, conducting thorough
84
Journal Didaskalia Vol 6, No. 2, October 2023
research, accurately referencing sources, and utilizing technological resources. Students can use technical
resources such as Artifact Intelligence (AI) and ChatGPT to effectively handle their workload and establish task
prioritization to address these concerns. Individuals may be required to engage in multiple academic works
concurrently. To effectively handle their workload and develop task priorities, individuals may utilize AI and
ChatGPT.
AI is a subfield of computer science that focuses on creating intelligent machines that can perform human-
like tasks. These positions may require learning new information, making decisions, solving problems, and speech
recognition (Ge & Lai, 2023). Increasingly more aspects of daily life employ AI. AI is a rapidly developing field
that has the potential to revolutionize a variety of industries and increase productivity in a vast array of areas,
including theological higher education. With the incorporation of AI into academic endeavors, educators and
students must consider and guarantee ethical usage (Cooper, 2023).
ChatGPT is one of the developments of AI. OpenAI company developed ChatGPT. ChatGPT is a
conversational agent that communicates in natural language. The system was designed to simulate human
conversation and assist users with various tasks. ChatGPT employs state-of-the-art natural language processing
algorithms and machine learning models to comprehend user inquiries and provide pertinent and accurate
responses. ChatGPT performs multiple functions as an AI assistant, including answering questions, making
recommendations, and joining casual conversations.
Due to its adaptability to different contexts and capacity to comprehend linguistic nuance, AI is a helpful
tool for academic papers (Hassani & Silva, 2023). AI is a tool that can quickly locate references to information,
making it ideal for generating research topic ideas through brainstorming. Contrary to ChatGPT, ChatGPT
disseminates information rapidly and abundantly without citations. Integrating AI and ChatGPT can provide users
with more accurate, valid, and dependable data. Users can still request references for information that has already
been provided. However, instructors and students should wait to utilize all ChatGPT and AI data. Both educators
and students are required to employ the Critical Thinking Method.
The concept of critical thinking has significantly progressed. Critical thinking is the methodical and
rigorous process of using knowledge to guide one's logic and performance. This method is distinguished by the
active and skilled application of knowledge gained through observation, experience, reflection, reasoning, or
communication. A higher-order thinking skill consists of asking questions, recognizing and testing previously held
assumptions, recognizing ambiguity, and engaging in various cognitive processes. It also requires remembering
facts, making informed decisions and judgments, and articulating, defending, and clarifying positions (Browne &
Keeley, 2007).
It is essential for evaluating information sources and constructing educators' and students' arguments
(Hummell, 2016). With the assistance of a rational, objective, and self-aware approach that emphasizes critical
thinking, students will have an easier time locating credible sources and bolstering their conclusions on academic
assignments. Critical thinking seeks to produce the highest quality academic work possible by employing accurate
information. It is a strategy for approaching problems in specific ways to research and determine the optimal
solution.
The critical thinking methodology requires a logical and methodical analysis of the evidence, arguments,
and ideas. It requires challenging presumptions, identifying biases, evaluating the data, and considering various
perspectives. This method aims to reach conclusions supported by sound reasoning and trusted evidence (Browne
& Keeley, 2007). The highest quality academic assignments will be produced by applying Critical Thinking. In
85
Journal Didaskalia Vol 6, No. 2, October 2023
light of this result, the author collaborates AI, ChatGPT, and Critical Thinking Methods for academic endeavors
for educators and students in theological higher education.
Based on the previous analysis, the author raises the question: how to implement AI, ChatGPT, and Critical
Thinking Methods in academic endeavors? What is the best practice for implementing AI, ChatGPT, and Critical
Thinking Methods in academic endeavors? What is the potential weakness of implementing AI, ChatGPT, and
Critical Thinking Methods in academic works in Theological Higher Education?
RESEARCH METHOD
The study utilized a library research approach, a method for identifying credible sources that offer factual
information or authoritative viewpoints related to the research query. The sources encompass primary and secondary
materials derived from books and academic journals. The author meticulously examined this data to construct a
structured analytical framework. The chosen data analysis technique was content analysis, and the findings were
conveyed in a descriptive manner (Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B, 2016).
86
Journal Didaskalia Vol 6, No. 2, October 2023
Prospecting References
The task of finding relevant references can be daunting for educators and students engaged in academic
endeavors. Prospecting references play a crucial role in facilitating the scholarly efforts and upholding intellectual
responsibility among educators and students. With the aid of artificial intelligence (AI), students can now conduct
their research and assignments in an academically sound manner, free from plagiarism. AI has brought about
significant advancements in academic studies, automating various time-consuming research tasks, including citation
formatting, which drastically reduces the time required (Lalbakhsh et al., 2022). Furthermore, website-based AI
consistently provides citations, benefiting students and educators seeking quick and accurate source verification.
Novelty Findings
Discovering novelties is one of the most challenging aspects of academic work. Educators and students are
required to assess and scrutinize prior theoretical findings to identify gaps, which represent novelty findings. AI can
expedite the process of novelty discovery in several ways, including the automation of time-consuming tasks,
enhanced research efficiency and quality, and assistance in forecasting and decision-making (Lee, 2022). It is
important to note that AI serves as a tool to accelerate novelty discovery, and educators and students with a
comprehensive understanding of how AI and critical thinking methodology intersect are well-positioned to make
groundbreaking discoveries and gain fresh insights that could significantly impact the academic field.
Novelty Booster
ChatGPT has the potential to stimulate the generation of creative ideas and fresh perspectives relevant to
research topics and inquiries. This tool can be especially valuable for educators and students looking to delve into
novel findings. Users can input a question or stimulus to ChatGPT, and the platform will generate a variety of opinions
and viewpoints on the subject. As a cutting-edge tool, it offers assistance to academics, students, and educators seeking
to expand their exploration of novel insights.
87
Journal Didaskalia Vol 6, No. 2, October 2023
References Discovery
One notable distinction between ChatGPT and website-based AI is the availability of references. Website-
based AI swiftly provides references for instructors and students to verify the information. In contrast to ChatGPT, it
generates explanations without citations. Consequently, educators and students must prompt ChatGPT with queries
to obtain references. ChatGPT typically offers ten references per chat, which educators and students can then review,
validate, and confirm in relation to the topic and data.
88
Journal Didaskalia Vol 6, No. 2, October 2023
Ennis's Definition: Critical thinking involves analyzing, critiquing, evaluating, and debating data derived from
personal experiences, observations, or communication to draw reliable conclusions with strong justifications. This
procedure entails examining data from multiple perspectives, considering source reliability, and challenging
assumptions. In numerous fields, including science and education, critical thinking proves beneficial (Ennis, n.d., pp.
81–111).
In summary, according to the aforementioned definitions, critical thinking is a systematic, logical, and careful
approach to analyzing and evaluating data or arguments for making well-informed decisions. It enables individuals to
think independently, engage in productive discussions and debates, and arrive at well-supported judgments and
conclusions based on facts and logic.
Ennis defines critical thinking as the process of analyzing, critiquing, evaluating, and debating data obtained
from personal experiences, observations, or communication, and drawing reliable conclusions supported by strong
justifications (Ennis, n.d., p. 81–111). This process entails examining data from various perspectives, assessing source
reliability, and challenging assumptions. Critical thinking is valuable in numerous fields, including science and
education.
According to these definitions, critical thinking represents a systematic, logical, and cautious approach to
analyzing and evaluating data or arguments to make well-informed decisions. It empowers individuals to think
independently, engage in productive discussions and debates, and arrive at well-supported judgments and conclusions
grounded in facts and logic. (Ennis, n.d.)
89
Journal Didaskalia Vol 6, No. 2, October 2023
During the analysis of information, educators and students can utilize critical thinking skills to uncover
correlations and associations that may not be immediately apparent. Critical thinking simplifies the process of drawing
reliable conclusions and confirming the accuracy of data interpretation (Lau, 2011, pp. 107–111). This, in turn, enables
educators and students to enhance the quality of their work. Furthermore, critical thought can improve the reliability
of the research process and the accuracy of its findings.
90
Journal Didaskalia Vol 6, No. 2, October 2023
Concept Development
Educators and students can generate intricate and intellectually stimulating research inquiries that demand
further examination and analytical interpretation. This can be achieved by harnessing AI and ChatGPT to derive
research ideas and questions from existing literature, data sources, and concept development. Furthermore, the
utilization of data analytics and machine learning algorithms can provide educators and students with the capability
to efficiently and precisely analyze extensive datasets, yielding research findings that are more reliable and
enlightening (Hyland, 2004).
Comprehensive Descriptions
Educators and students can employ ChatGPT outputs from various systematically annotated sources. This can
aid in interpreting research findings, creating hypothetical scenarios, or conducting surveys. Furthermore, ChatGPT
has the potential to assist educators and students in identifying data that may have been previously overlooked.
ChatGPT can generate novel insights and discoveries that contribute to the advancement of various academic
disciplines.
91
Journal Didaskalia Vol 6, No. 2, October 2023
Best Practice Implementation of AI, ChatGPT, and Critical Thinking for Academic Endeavors
The specific procedures and methodologies may vary depending on the disciplinary domain and research
context. Therefore, educators and students must thoroughly review pertinent scholarly works and seek guidance from
experienced colleagues to ensure the appropriateness and rigor of their research methods. To effectively integrate
artificial intelligence, specifically ChatGPT, and critical thinking into scholarly research, it is essential to define a
well-structured problem and formulate a research question. Here is the best practice sequence for the integration of
AI, ChatGPT, and Critical Thinking methods in academic pursuits:
92
Journal Didaskalia Vol 6, No. 2, October 2023
93
Journal Didaskalia Vol 6, No. 2, October 2023
Constructing Arguments
Educators and students can construct and present well-reasoned arguments based on the precise data available
(Carroll, 2019, pp. 100–120). Formulating an argumentative discourse involves clearly defining a proposition or
concept and providing supporting evidence. A persuasive argument necessitates a comprehensive examination of the
available data, a logical and coherent thought process, and the compilation of relevant and compelling evidence. It is
crucial to establish correlations among different sections of a written work and connect them to a specific context. To
ensure the effectiveness and validity of an argument, it must be presented clearly and concisely, supported by
empirical evidence. Additionally, the overarching statement should exhibit logical coherence, establishing a rational
and cohesive line of reasoning. In academic settings, it is common for lecturers and students to anticipate
counterarguments and subsequently address them thoughtfully and logically. Moreover, incorporating transitional
phrases and words can facilitate a seamless transition between different sections, thereby enhancing the overall
cohesiveness of the written composition.
94
Journal Didaskalia Vol 6, No. 2, October 2023
its capacity to consistently emphasize a main idea, typically introduced in the topic sentence, whereby each subsequent
sentence aids in its elaboration. To ensure coherence within a paragraph, the sentences must exhibit seamless
transitions, establishing a cohesive and fluid progression. To adhere to the conventions of academic writing, the
paragraph must display sufficient development.
Analyzing Paragraphs
After constructing a comprehensive and flawless paragraph, educators and students should engage in a
thorough paragraph analysis. This process involves examining a paragraph to identify its main ideas and understand
its structural components. It is advisable to follow a prescribed sequence of steps when conducting a paragraph
analysis.
In academic settings, educators and students often follow a structured approach to paragraph construction.
Each paragraph typically begins with a topic sentence that introduces the main idea and subsequent arguments. Both
educators and students provide supporting evidence or references. This process helps ensure that the written content
maintains coherence and facilitates comprehension.
Within academic discourse, educators and students identify lexical items or expressions that establish
coherence and cohesion between successive sentences within a paragraph. Both lecturers and students can offer
additional information or provide contextual details. The concluding statement summarizes the main ideas discussed
in the preceding paragraph and establishes a solid link to the introductory topic sentence and supporting argument.
Academic evaluation involves assessing paragraphs by educators and students to determine their alignment
with the thesis statement's initial assertion. This evaluation examines various elements, including a well-defined topic
sentence, robust supporting evidence, and a compelling concluding sentence that effectively synthesizes the
paragraph's content. The analysis of paragraphs plays a crucial role in upholding an essay's overall coherence and
structure. Providing robust corroborating evidence enhances the validity and persuasiveness of the thesis statement's
assertion.
Harmonizing Paragraphs
The process of harmonizing a paragraph involves integrating information and concepts from various sources
to construct a persuasive argument. The following procedures can be employed to condense paragraphs. Identifying
the topic sentence is a crucial aspect. The topic sentence should encompass the paragraph's central idea and express
the author's position. Identifying additional information that supports or clarifies the main idea is essential. These
details within the abstract are crucial to provide context and strengthen the central argument.
To enhance the academic quality of the text, it is recommended that each paragraph incorporates multiple
sources. This approach ensures that the information presented is well-supported and draws upon various scholarly
perspectives. Moreover, to provide a clear structure and coherence, the topic sentence of each paragraph should serve
as a concise overview of the primary arguments that will be discussed within that paragraph. By adhering to these
guidelines, the text will demonstrate a rigorous and well-researched academic approach. By incorporating various
perspectives, lecturers and students can develop a more comprehensive and nuanced argument that considers a range
of viewpoints and potential counterarguments. The evidence above supports the central thesis and demonstrates the
author's thorough research and thoughtful consideration of various views before presenting their perspective.
Including various sources can augment the effectiveness of the writer's position and demonstrate their capacity to
evaluate and incorporate information from multiple channels.
95
Journal Didaskalia Vol 6, No. 2, October 2023
The process of harmonizing requires the reader to integrate their reflections, perspectives, interpretations, and
connections to develop an original and comprehensive understanding that goes beyond the limitations of the original
text. Evaluating the amalgamation, the paragraph is assessed to ascertain whether it effectively incorporates and
amalgamates information from diverse sources while providing initial analysis to generate innovative concepts. In
addition, evaluating the amalgamation's effectiveness and conciseness in conveying creative ideas is crucial. The
importance of ensuring that novel concepts are underpinned by empirical evidence and sound logical reasoning cannot
be overstated.
Drawing Conclusions
To arrive at appropriate conclusions based on the evidence, educators and students must critically evaluate the
reliability and credibility of their sources. Additional measures that can be taken include considering a wide range of
perspectives, encompassing various viewpoints, epistemologies, and theoretical frameworks within the realm of
critical thinking. In the pursuit of research, two essential skills are imperative to achieve favorable outcomes. Utilizing
critical thinking skills empowers researchers to enhance their ability to identify logical fallacies, avoid errors in their
reasoning, and reach more informed conclusions.
It is important to note that the conclusion should not repeat the entire discussion. Instead, it should briefly
recap the problem and the solutions identified during the discussion. The discussion should have clarified the issue at
hand and offered several workable solutions. Educators and students have discovered potential solutions to the
problem by examining various viewpoints and considering several variables. Furthermore, the conclusion must serve
as the culmination of the research endeavor, requiring brevity, conciseness, and clarity to ensure that all remaining
questions are addressed.
96
Journal Didaskalia Vol 6, No. 2, October 2023
Potential Weaknesses
Utilizing ChatGPT in conjunction with critical thinking methodologies in research offers numerous advantages
but also comes with inherent limitations. Several potential weaknesses can be identified when considering the
collaboration between ChatGPT and essential research methods.
The lack of transparency becomes evident in the implementation of machine learning algorithms by ChatGPT,
as they are not easily understandable or transparent. Consequently, the cognitive processes responsible for generating
the concepts produced by ChatGPT may pose difficulties in comprehension, potentially reducing their effectiveness.
In this context, theology educators and students are obliged to uphold principles of honesty and transparency. This
obligation stems from their dual responsibility, encompassing both academic rigor and spiritual commitment,
particularly their accountability to a higher power.
The use of specific training data in ChatGPT may introduce the possibility of generating suggestions that
deviate from the intended research inquiries or demonstrate bias, leading to flawed interpretations or
recommendations. AI and ChatGPT rely on personal convictions, making them ill-suited for serving as a foundation
for biblical interpretation, theological perspectives, or dogmatic viewpoints.
Ethical concerns surrounding academic discourse are of significant importance. ChatGPT utilizes data obtained
from the internet and has faced allegations of disseminating misinformation and producing fabricated news. Using the
outcomes from such a model can raise ethical considerations. In this scenario, it is crucial for educators and students
to diligently cite all data sourced from the internet to maintain academic integrity and ensure accountability, providing
precedence to reputable sources such as scholarly books, academic journals, conference proceedings, or other research
findings.
The issue of generating erroneous conclusions arises when individuals excessively rely on technology, such as
ChatGPT, to generate ideas without adequately verifying the results through critical analysis. In this context, educators
97
Journal Didaskalia Vol 6, No. 2, October 2023
and learners must independently arrive at conclusions, refraining from excessive dependence on AI and ChatGPT.
The goal is for educators and learners to produce precise and thorough findings.
CONCLUSION
The integration of AI, particularly ChatGPT, with the application of critical thinking, can significantly enhance
the efficiency, accuracy, and innovation of academic research. AI and ChatGPT can facilitate the generation of
research ideas, automate data collection and organization processes, create concise summaries of intricate and
extensive research literature, identify deficiencies in current research, and suggest potential directions for future
studies. The utilization of AI technology has the potential to bring about a paradigm shift in research across diverse
disciplines, resulting in outcomes characterized by enhanced precision and efficiency.
The application of critical thinking is imperative for assessing the contextual relevance and credibility of data
analyzed by AI and ChatGPT models. The systematic use of annotations can aid in the comprehension of research
outcomes. To enhance the reliability of AI and ChatGPT, it is essential to incorporate impartial research bias
assessments, practical criteria, and ethical considerations. Integrating AI and ChatGPT in academic research enables
researchers to improve the research process and generate more innovative and relevant outcomes. However, it is
crucial to emphasize that the combination of AI and ChatGPT should complement human intelligence and creativity
rather than serve as a substitute for them.
To ensure the appropriateness and rigor of their methodologies, educators and students must thoroughly review
relevant literature and seek guidance from experienced peers. The integration of AI, specifically ChatGPT, and the
application of critical thinking is essential in academic research. This integration serves the purpose of defining a
well-structured problem and constructing a research question. Employing mapping inquiries is a viable strategy to
enhance the effectiveness of research endeavors. Data analysis is crucial for identifying relevant and valuable
information, conceptualizing key concepts, constructing persuasive arguments, and considering the target audience.
The process of synthesizing a paragraph entails integrating knowledge and concepts from various sources to build a
compelling argument. Referencing data sources offers immediate and long-term advantages to data consumers and
creators. Reference managers can automate the task of inserting and formatting citations and bibliographies.
The integration of ChatGPT and critical thinking methodologies in research offers numerous benefits but also
comes with inherent limitations. Some concerns include the need for greater transparency in the utilization of machine
learning algorithms, the possibility of ChatGPT generating suggestions that diverge from the research inquiries, and
the absence of personal beliefs in AI and ChatGPT. Furthermore, ChatGPT utilizes data from the internet and has
faced allegations of disseminating false information and producing fabricated news. The issue of generating inaccurate
conclusions arises when individuals excessively rely on technology, such as ChatGPT, to generate ideas without
sufficiently verifying the outcomes through critical analysis.
REFERENCES
Ge, J., & Lai, J. C. (2023). Artificial Intelligence-Based Text Generators in Hepatology: ChatGPT Is Just the
Beginning. Hepatology Communications, 7(4). https://journals.lww.com/10.1097/HC9.0000000000000097
Cooper, G. (2023). Examining Science Education in ChatGPT: An Exploratory Study of Generative Artificial
Intelligence. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 32(3), 444–452.
98
Journal Didaskalia Vol 6, No. 2, October 2023
Hassani, H., & Silva, E. S. (2023). The Role of ChatGPT in Data Science: How AI-Assisted Conversational Interfaces
Are Revolutionizing the Field. Big Data and Cognitive Computing, 7(2), 62.
Browne, M. N., & Keeley, S. M. (2007). Asking the Right Questions, A Guide to Critical Thinking. Prentice Hall.
Hummell, L. (2016). 21st Century Skills: Critical Thinking Skills. The Elementary STEM Journal, 20(4).
Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2016). Designing Qualitative Research (6th ed.). Sage Publisher.
Bello-Orgaz, G., Jung, J. J., & Camacho, D. (2016). Social Big Data: Recent Achievements and New Challenges.
Information Fusion, 28, 45–59.
Crowston, K., Allen, E. E., & Heckman, R. (2012). Using Natural Language Processing Technology for Qualitative
Data Analysis. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 15(6), 523–543.
Tang, K.-Y., Chang, C.-Y., & Hwang, G.-J. (2021). Trends in Artificial Intelligence-Supported e-Learning: A
Systematic Review and Co-Citation Network Analysis (1998–2019). Interactive Learning Environments, 1–19.
Barredo Arrieta, A., et al. (2020). Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities
and Challenges toward Responsible AI. Information Fusion, 58, 82–115.
Lalbakhsh, A., et al. (2022). Advancements and Artificial Intelligence Approaches in Antennas for Environmental
Sensing. In Artificial Intelligence and Data Science in Environmental Sensing (pp. 19–38). Elsevier.
Lee, H. (2022). Developing an Approach to Support Instructors to Provide Emotional and Instructional Scaffolding
for English Language Learners Through Biosensor-Based Feedback (Dissertation). University of Maryland.
Mostafizer Rahman, M., & Watanobe, Y. (2023). ChatGPT for Education and Research: Opportunities, Threats, and
Strategies. Applied Sciences, 13(9), 5783.
Kasneci, E., et al. (2023). ChatGPT for Good? On Opportunities and Challenges of Large Language Models for
Education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274.
Dwivedi, Y. K., et al. (2023). "‘So, What If ChatGPT Wrote It?’ Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Opportunities,
Challenges and Implications of Generative Conversational AI for Research, Practice and Policy." International Journal
of Information Management, 71, 102642.
Przegalinska, A., et al. (2019). "In Bot We Trust: A New Methodology of Chatbot Performance Measures." Business
Horizons, 62(6), 785–797.
Zhang, D. (2023). "Should ChatGPT and Bard Share Revenue with Their Data Providers? A New Business Model for
the AI Era." Retrieved June 7, 2023, from https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.02555.
Suter, W. N. (2012). Introduction to Educational Research: A Critical Thinking Approach. Sage Publisher.
Davies, M. (2015). A Model of Critical Thinking in Higher Education. In Higher Education: Handbook of Theory
and Research, Ed. M. B. Paulsen (Vol. 30, Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, pp. 41–92). Springer
International Publishing. Link.
Ennis, R. H. (n.d.). A Concept of Critical Thinking: A Proposed Basis for Research in the Teaching and Evaluation
of Critical Thinking Ability. Harvard Educational Review, 32(1), 81–111.
Robert H. Ennis. (n.d.). A Concept of Critical Thinking: A Proposed Basis for Research in the Teaching and
Evaluation of Critical Thinking Ability. Harvard Educational Review, 32(1), 81–111.
Lau, J. Y. F. (2011). An Introduction to Critical Thinking and Creativity: Think More, Think Better. Wiley.
99
Journal Didaskalia Vol 6, No. 2, October 2023
Jackson, S. L. (2015). Research Methods and Statistics: A Critical Thinking Approach. Cengage Learning.
Lau, J. Y. F. (2011). An Introduction to Critical Thinking and Creativity: Think More, Think Better.
Smith, B., & McGannon, K. R. (2018). Developing Rigor in Qualitative Research: Problems and Opportunities within
Sport and Exercise Psychology. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 11(1), 101–121.
Elo, S., et al. (2014). Qualitative Content Analysis: A Focus on Trustworthiness. SAGE Open, 4(1),
215824401452263.
Lau, J. Y. F. (2011). An Introduction to Critical Thinking and Creativity: Think More, Think Better. New York:
Wiley.
Kelley, D. (2014). The Art of Reasoning: An Introduction to Logic and Critical Thinking. New York dan London: W.
W. NORTON & COMPANY, INC.
Hill, H. C., Ball, D. L., & Schilling, S. G. (2008). Unpacking Pedagogical Content Knowledge: Conceptualizing and
Measuring Teachers’ Topic-Specific Knowledge of Students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(4),
372–400.
Carroll, J. E. (2019). Epistemic Explanations for Divergent Evolution in Discourses Regarding Students’ Extended
Historical Writing in England. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 51(1), 100–120.
Owen-Smith, J. (2001). Managing Laboratory Work through Skepticism: Processes of Evaluation and Control.
American Sociological Review, 66(3), 427.
Lau, J. Y. F. (2011). An Introduction to Critical Thinking and Creativity: Think More, Think Better.
100