Scribd
Upload
16 views

For Laboratory Report CMT

The document provides guidelines for two laboratory reports on sieve analysis and specific gravity/absorption of aggregates. The reports should include: 1) A title page with student name, course info, and abstract 2) Sections on objectives, procedures, data/results, discussion, and conclusion 3) References and documentation with name and report number 4) Page numbers and long bond paper The reports will be graded on presentation, title/introduction, materials/methods, and analysis/interpretation.

Uploaded by

cmharvina
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
16 views

For Laboratory Report CMT

The document provides guidelines for two laboratory reports on sieve analysis and specific gravity/absorption of aggregates. The reports should include: 1) A title page with student name, course info, and abstract 2) Sections on objectives, procedures, data/results, discussion, and conclusion 3) References and documentation with name and report number 4) Page numbers and long bond paper The reports will be graded on presentation, title/introduction, materials/methods, and analysis/interpretation.

Uploaded by

cmharvina
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6

For Laboratory Report (Individual) [Serves as your Quizzes]

Use Long Bond Paper

Laboratory #1

SIEVE ANALYSIS OF FINE AND COARSE AGGREGATES

Laboratory # 2

RELATIVE DENSITY (SPECIFIC GRAVITY) AND ABSORPTION OF COARSE AGGREGATE

GUIDELINES:

1. You can create your own template for the laboratory report as long as it covers all information
needed.
2. For the front page;
a. Subject Code and Subject Name
b. Laboratory Report Number
c. Title of the Laboratory
d. Name of the Student
e. Section
f. Name of Instructor
g. Abstract
h. Significance and use
i. Standard Reference
3. For succeeding pages
a. Objectives
b. Experimental Procedure
i. Materials and Equipment
ii. Methodology
iii. Data Analysis
c. Data and Results
d. Discussion
e. Summary and Conclusion
f. Laboratory Suggestions
g. Documentation
4. Use footnote with the following information: Name and Laboratory Report Number
5. Put page number every page after front page.
Other References

Site all reference use in the laboratory work

Rubric for Grading


I. Presentation and Writing Quality (30 points)
Exceptional (22-30 points): Report is well-organized, free of grammatical errors, and written in a clear,
scientific style.

Satisfactory (15-21 points):): Report is mostly organized, with minor grammatical errors. Writing is
generally clear.

Needs Improvement (0-14 points): Report is disorganized, with numerous grammatical errors and
unclear writing.

II. Title and Introduction (20 points)


Exceptional (18-20 points): Title is clear, concise, and accurately describes the experiment. Introduction
provides a strong background, clearly outlines objectives, and states the importance of the experiment.

Satisfactory (12-17 points): Title is appropriate but could be clearer. Introduction provides some
background and states the objectives.

Needs Improvement (0-11 points): Title is vague or missing. Introduction lacks background information
and/or objectives are not stated.

III. Materials and Methods (20 points)


Exceptional (18-20 points): Comprehensive list of materials. Methods are described in detail, allowing
for easy replication of the experiment.

Satisfactory (12-17 points): Lists most materials and describes methods, but some details may be
missing or unclear.

Needs Improvement (0-11 points): Incomplete list of materials and methods are not adequately
described

IV. Analysis and Interpretation (30 points)


Exceptional (22-30 points): Comprehensive analysis of data. Interpretation is logically sound, with strong
reasoning and clear conclusions. Relates results back to objectives and background material.

Satisfactory (15-21 points): Adequate analysis and interpretation but may lack depth. Conclusions are
mostly clear but may be superficial.

Needs Improvement (0-14 points): Poor analysis and interpretation. Conclusions are unclear or missing.
Sample Lab Report:

You might also like