Fever of Unknown Origin
Fever of Unknown Origin
• Why to change
- Difference on spectrum of underlying diseases
- Alteration of immune system
- Duration of investigations
( depend on the type of investigations)
- Systematic review
- Jan 1966 – Dec 2000
- Petersdorf and Beeson criteria
- Exclude immunocompromised
and younger than 18 yr
- N-US, W-EU, Scandinavia
- Most common cause
- ID; Tuberculosis,
intraabdominal abscess
- CA; Hodgkin disease and
non Hodgkin lymphoma
- Temporal arteritis 16-17%
malaria
Typhoid fever
Hodkin’s disease
(Pel-Ebstein pattern)
Relapsing fever
(Borreliosis)
William F W, Philip AM, Mandell, Douglas, and Bennett's Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases, 56, 721-731.e1
Investigations
• No specific guideline developed, but classified to non-specific,
and specific tests
• Investigations driven by clinical clues, local epidemiologic
data, and tests availabilities
• Petersdorf required several investions;1
- Bacteriological and serological tests
- Skin tests
- Radiographs of chest and IVP
• Ultrasound and CT scan are significant role since 1980s2
1.Petersdorf RB, et al, Medicine 1961; 40: 1-30 2. .Knockaert D.C, et al. Journal of internal medicine 2003; 253: 263-275
Initial investigations 2003
Minimum diagnostic evaluation required for a case to qualify as classical fever of unknown origin
Using of interferon-γ release assay (IGRA) has limited sensitivity and specificity for diagnose TB2
Tuberculin skin test perhaps used for diagnose sarcoid2
1.Vanderschueren S, et al Acta Clinica Belgica 2014; Vol69,no 6;pages 412-417 2. Brown M. Postgrad Med J 2015; 91:665-669
Secondary evaluations
1. Elizabeth C, et al, American Family Physician, 2014, Vol 90;91-96 2. Vanderschueren S, et alActa Clinica Belgica 2014, Vol 69; no 6; pages 412-417
3. Cunha BA, et al. Infect Dis Clin North Am, 2007; 21(4):867-915 4. Brown M. Postgrad Med J 2015; 91:665-669
Secondary investigations
• Imaging studies
- CT chest-abdomen-pelvic sensitivity 82-92% and
specificity 60-70%1
- Echocardiogram requested in suspicious cases1,3
- MRI give benefit on vasculitis on aortic arch and
great vessel of neck1
- F-FDG-PET could find 40% diagnostic yield, and
up to 54% with combined with CT2
• Invasive tests
- LN biopsy is the most, 10-35% provided positive
results2, avoid in anterior cervical, axillary, or inguinal
area due to minute chance1
- BM biopsy revealed 25% causes of fever, but
culture and aspiration showed only 0-2% results2
- Liver biopsy found out 14-17% final outcome2
• Molecular techniques in immunocompetent pt has
high false positive result in whom the yield is low3
1. Cunha, et al, The american Journal of medicine( 2015) 128, 1138 2. .Elizabeth C, et al, American Family Physician, 2014, Vol 90;91-96
3. Brown M. Postgrad Med J 2015; 91:665-669
Treatments
1.Knockaert D.C, et al. J Intern Med 2003; 253: 263-275 2. Vanderschueren S, et al Acta Clinica Belgica 2014, Vol 69; no 6; pages 412-417
3. Cunha BA, et al. Infect Dis Clin North Am, 2007; 21(4):867-915 4. Brown M. Postgrad Med J 2015; 91:665-669
Prognosis