A Dual Band Patch Antenna For Bluetooth and Wireless Local Area Networks Applications
A Dual Band Patch Antenna For Bluetooth and Wireless Local Area Networks Applications
etched lattice of certain shape located on the performance. Table 1 shows the optimized
ground plane. The performance of microstrip parametric values of the entire structure of the
antennas can be enhanced by introducing the dual band antenna.
defects in the ground plane [16]. The shape of the
defect may be changed from the simple shape to
the complicated shape for better performance.
Where is the velocity of light in free space. 10 x-coordinate of the feed point, -1
bandwidth of the antenna for the second beamwidth, direction of main lobe and side lobe
resonance is 162.12 MHz centered at 5.8 GHz level are presented in Table 2. The simulated
which is suitable for WLANs application. The maximum directivity and maximum gain of the
simulated and measured results show good proposed antenna are shown in Fig. 7. The
agreement except little shift in the resonant maximum gain and maximum directivity of
frequencies of the measured results to lower 7.398 dB and 7.923 dBi, respectively are
frequencies. The deviation in the measured and achieved by the antenna. The total efficiency and
simulated results are possibly due to following radiation efficiency of the antenna are presented
reasons. The main reason may be connector in Table 3. The maximum total efficiency and
losses and dielectric losses. Other possible reason maximum radiation efficiency are 87.99% and
is the PCB fabrication resolution limitation which 88.9%, respectively.
mainly affected at corners of slots etc. The
diameter of the hole that was supposed to be
drilled for SMA connector was designed to be
1.3 mm and the diameter of the hole that was
really drilled was 1.5 mm because in the PCB
laboratory the smallest size of the drilling bit that
could closely meet the diameter specifications of
the desired hole has a diameter of 1.5 mm. Since
the location of the feed point tends to affect the
operating bands of the antenna, hence this could
possibly be one of the reasons for the
inconsistency between the simulated and
measured results.
(a) E-plane
Table 4: Performance comparison of the proposed designer even though there were some small
antenna with other reported antennas deviations in the prototype and simulated results
that were mainly attributed to possible connector
Ref. Patch Fabri- Resonant Max. Max.
area cation / center Gain Direc- losses, dielectric losses and fabrication errors.
freq. tivity The proposed dual band antenna provides high
[7] 706.5 Higher 3.42 GHz, -- 5.07 directivity in both bands and simple to fabricate.
mm2 cost 3.73 GHz dB,
and 5.56 Although multiband antennas can be used in
complex dB different wireless application, but they lack the
[14] 21x Low 3.4 GHz, 2.4 -- flexibility to accommodate new services, and
15.3 cost 5.5 GHz dBi,
mm2 and 3.5
therefore, it is in the designer’s wishes to further
simple dBi improve the design from multiband antennas to
[17] 7x 18 Higher 2.46 GHz, 2.31 -- frequency reconfigurable multiband antenna.
mm2 cost 4.94 GHz dBi,
and 3.9
complex dBi
[18] 22.5x Low 2.43 GHz, 2.053 3.20 ACKNOWLEDGMENT
14 cost 5.52 GHz dB, dBi
mm2 and 4.52 4.52
simple dB dBi Authors are thankful to reviewers for their
[19] 39.6x Low 2.5 GHz, 6.7 -- comments/suggestions for improving the quality
47.4 cost 3.5 GHz dB,
mm2 and 5.1
of manuscript. Authors also pay their gratitude to
simple dB University of KwaZulu-Natal for providing
[20] 21x Low 2.63 GHz, 2.4 -- laboratory facilities and financial support for this
19.5 cost 4.65 GHz dBi,
mm2 and -2.2 work.
simple dBi
[21] 29x Low 2.4 GHz, 1 --
29 cost 5.5 GHz dBi,
mm2 and 0.26 REFERENCES
simple dBi
[22] 40x Low 1.8 GHz, 4.08 -- [1] C. A. Balanis, Antenna Theory: Analysis and Design,
29 cost 2.4 GHz dBi, Wiley, May 2005.
mm2 and 5.79
simple dBi [2] R. Garg, P. Bhartia, I. Bahl and A. Ittipiboon, Microstrip
Antenna Design Handbook, Artech House Publishers,
Propo 25x Low 2.4 GHz, 4.3 5.1
Boston, London, Nov. 2000.
-sed 25 cost 5.8 GHz dB, dBi,
ante- mm2 and 7.4 7.9 [3] P. Kumar and J. L. Masa-Campos, “A novel dual
nna simple dB dBi polarized waveguide fed circular patch antenna for Ku
band applications”, Microwave and Optical Technology
Letters, Vol. 59, pp. 1743-1750, May 2017.
[4] O. Oulhaj, N. A. Touhami, M. Aghoutane and A. Tazon,
“A miniature microstrip patch antenna array with
IV. CONCLUSION defected ground structure”, International Journal of
Microwave and Optical Technology, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp.
The design, fabrication and measurement of a 32-39, Jan. 2016.
[5] P. Kumar, “Design of low cross-polarized patch antenna
dual band microstrip patch antenna have been for ultra-wideband applications, International Journal on
presented. The results of the dual band antenna Antenna Communications and Propagation, Vol. 7, No.
reflected useful characteristics that are suitable 4, pp. 265-270, June 2017.
for the acceptable standards of the Bluetooth and [6] R. Varma, J. Ghosh, and R. Bhattacharya, “A compact
dual frequency double U‐slot rectangular microstrip
wireless local area networks applications. The patch antenna for WiFi/WiMAX”, Microwave and
dual mode has been achieved by loading slots on Optical Technology Letters, Vol. 59, pp. 2174-2179,
June 2017.
the ground plane and parametric analysis was [7] P. Kumar and N. Bisht, “Stacked coupled circular
carried out to select proper slots types, sizes and microstrip patch antenna for dual band. applications”,
positions. The performance of the dual band Proceeding of Progress in Electromagnetics Research
Symposium, pp. 629-632, China, Sept. 2011.
antenna at two resonant frequencies 2.4 GHz and [8] P. Kumar, “Computation of resonant frequency of gap-
5.8 GHz conformed to the expectations of the coupled ring microstrip antennas”, International Journal