Philippine Family Code Primer 2021
Philippine Family Code Primer 2021
PRIMER
Prepared and published online by SALIGAN
With the support of MISEREOR
2021
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. MARRIAGE 1
a. Requisites of Marriage 2
b. Marriages Exempted from License Requirement 3
c. Void and Voidable Marriages 6
V. THE FAMILY 38
a. The Family as an Institution 38
b. The Family Home 39
VII. ADOPTION 46
VIII. SUPPORT 60
IX. PARENTAL AUTHORITY 62
a. General Provisions 62
b. Substitute and Special Parental Authority 63
c. Effect of Parental Authority Upon the Persons of the Children 64
d. Effect of the Parental Authority Upon the Property of the Children 65
e. Suspension or Termination of Parental Authority 66
A. REQUISITES OF MARRIAGE
ESSENTIAL REQUISITES
I. Legal Capacity
a. Husband and wife should be 18 years old;
b. Must be between a man and a woman,
i. Effect of sex-change
● The Supreme Court said that sex is determined by visually
looking at the genitals of a baby at the time of birth and that
there is no law legally recognizing sex reassignment. (Silverio v.
Republic, G.R. No. 174689, October 19, 2007, 537 SCRA 373)
This means that the husband and wife must be a man and a
woman from birth.
● Intersex individuals: Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia (CAH)
which is a condition where the person afflicted has both male
and female characteristics and organs (Intersex). The Supreme
Court said that it is up to the individual what gender they may
choose. (Republic v. Cagandahan, G.R. No. 166676, September
12, 2008, 565 SCRA 72)
c. No impediment to marry each other.
i. The husband nor the wife must be in a valid and existing
relationship.
ii. The husband and the wife must not be related to each other, by
blood (consanguinity) or by law (affinity).
II. Consent
a. Freely given
Consent here refers to the consent of the contracting parties. The
consent must refer to the contracting parties’ bona fide intention to
be married to the other. i.e. to make the woman his wife. (People v.
Santiago, G.R. No. 27972, 1927)
i. Marriage is a voluntary act.
1. If there is consent but vitiated by error, fraud, intimidation, force,
etc., the consent is not given freely, therefore the marriage is
voidable – meaning valid until annulled.
2. If there is no consent – the husband or the wife or both do not
want to get married to the other/ each other – the marriage is
invalid/ void.
MARRIAGE 3
III. No Subsisting Marriage
A judicial decree terminating the previous marriage is required for
remarriage.
FORMAL REQUISITES
Alcantara v Alcantara
G.R. No. 167776, August 28, 2007
The Supreme Court ruled that the issuance of a marriage license is the most
important requisite in the validity of a marriage as it is the only act whereby
the state intervenes in the formation of the family.Without a marriage license,
the marriage should be considered void. To be considered void on the ground
of the absence of such marriage license, the law requires that the absence of
such marriage license must be apparent on the marriage contract of at the
very least, supported by a certification from the local civil registrar that no
such marriage license was issued to the parties.
III. Marriage ceremony
a. The family code requires the following:
i. The bride and groom must personally appear;
1. Marriage by proxy is not allowed in the Philippines.
ii. The marriage must be done in the presence of the following:
1. The solemnizing officer;
2. Not less than two (2) individuals who are of legal age.
IV. Divorce
a. Divorce under our law is possible only when the national law of a
foreign spouse permits it. Divorce between a Filipino citizen and a
foreigner which capacitates the latter to remarry shall capacitate
the Filipino spouse to marry.
In the recent case of Manalo, the Court en banc extended the scope of Article
26 (2) to even cover instances where the divorce decree is obtained solely by
the Filipino spouse. Pursuant to the majority ruling in Manalo, Article 26 (2)
applies to mixed marriages where the divorce decree is: (i) obtained by the
foreign spouse; (ii) obtained jointly by the Filipino and foreign spouse; and (iii)
obtained solely by the Filipino spouse. Based on the records, Cynthia and Park
obtained a divorce decree by mutual agreement under the laws of South Ko-
rea. The sufficiency of the evidence presented by Cynthia to prove the issu-
ance of said divorce decree and the governing national law of her husband
Park was not put in issue. Thus, the Court ruled that as confirmed by Manalo,
the divorce decree obtained by Park, with or without Cynthia’s conformity, falls
within the scope of Article 26 (2) and merits recognition in this jurisdiction.
Note:
Philippine laws do not provide for absolute divorce between Filipinos
except between Muslim Filipinos and Filipino citizens cannot obtain a
divorce abroad.
VOID MARRIAGES
The Supreme Court ruled that the stringent requirements set forth by Mo-
lina should be relaxed and applied case-to-case. To require the allegation
of the root cause of psychological incapacity by an accredited psychologist
may prove too expensive for the parties. But where the parties had full op-
portunity to present expert opinions, such will be weighed by the Court in its
decision.
Tan-Andal v Andal
G.R.No. 196359, May 11, 2021
The Supreme Court overruled its decisions in the previous cases on psycho-
logical incapacity. Psychological incapacity consists of clear acts of dysfunc-
tionality that show a lack of understanding and concomitant compliance with
one’s essential marital obligations due to psychic causes. The court now cat-
egorically abandons the second Molina guideline. Psychological incapacity is
neither a mental incapacity nor a personality disorder that must be proven
through expert opinion. There must be proof, however, of the durable or en-
during aspects of a person’s personality, called “personality structure,” which
manifests itself through clear acts of dysfunctionality that undermines the
family.It is not a medical illness that has to be medically or clinically identi-
fied; hence, expert opinion is not required. Difficult to prove as it may be, a
party to a nullity case is still required to prove juridical antecedence because
it is an explicit requirement of the law. Proof of juridically antecedent psy-
chological incapacity may consist of testimonies describing the environment
where the supposedly incapacitated spouse lived that may have led to a par-
ticular behavior.
VOIDABLE MARRIAGES
Buccat v. Buccat
G.R. No 47101, 1941
The woman was 7 months pregnant at the time she met petitioner. He
cannot claim that the pregnancy was concealed from him and that he
was defrauded into marrying her.
Aquino v. Delizo
G.R. No. L-15853, 1960
But where the wife concealed the fact that she was 4 months preg-
nant during the time of the marriage and was “naturally plump,” Delizo
could hardly be expected to know, by mere looking, whether or not she
was pregnant at the time of the marriage.
Almelor v. RTC
G.R. No. 179620, 2008
It is the concealment of homosexuality, and not homosexuality per
se, that vitiates the consent of the innocent party. Such concealment
presupposes bad faith and intent to defraud the other party in giving
consent to the marriage.
Void Voidable
Action for nullity. Action for annulment.
Considered as having never to Valid until otherwise declared by the court.
have taken place and cannot
be the source of rights.
Can never be ratified. Can be generally ratified or confirmed by free
cohabitation or prescription.
Can be attacked collaterally. Cannot be assailed collaterally except in a direct
proceeding. This means that its validity can only be
questioned in a proceeding specifically initiated for such
purpose.
Can be questioned even after Can be assailed only during only during the lifetime of
the death of either party. the parties and not after death of either.
II. LEGAL SEPARATION
A. GROUNDS
a. Repeated physical violence or grossly abusive conduct directed against
the petitioner, a common child, or a child of the petitioner;
b. Physical violence or moral pressure to compel the petitioner to change
religious or political affiliation;
c. Attempt of respondent to corrupt or induce the petitioner, a common
child, or a child of the petitioner, to engage in prostitution, or connivance
in such corruption or inducement;
d. Final judgment sentencing the respondent to imprisonment of more
than six years, even if pardoned; Drug addiction or habitual alcoholism of
the respondent;
e. Lesbianism or homosexuality of the respondent;
f. Contracting by the respondent of a subsequent bigamous marriage,
whether in the Philippines or abroad;
• Adultery is not a continuing crime; it is consummated at every
moment of carnal knowledge. Thus, every sexual act is a ground
for legal separation. (People v. Zapata and Bondoc, G.R. No. L-3047,
1951)
g. Sexual infidelity or perversion;
h. Attempt by the respondent against the life of the petitioner; or
i. Abandonment of petitioner by respondent without justifiable cause for
more than one year.
• To be a ground for legal separation, abandonment must be
without just cause. (Ong Eng Kiam v. Ong, G.R. No. 153206, 2006)
For purposes of this Article, the term “child” shall include a child by nature
or by adoption. (9a)
14 LEGAL SEPARATION
B. DEFENSES
a. Where the aggrieved party has condoned the offense or act complained
of
i. The Supreme Court ruled that condonation may be given expressly or
impliedly. An example of an implied condonation is when a husband
repeatedly has intercourse with the wife despite the wife’s cruelty.
“Although he did not wish it, [he did it] eventually for the sake of
peace.” (Willan v. Willan, G.R. No. L-13553, 1960)
b. Where the aggrieved party has consented to the commission of the
offense or act complained of;
i. A husband who doesn’t interfere with regard to the amorous relations
between his wife and Ramos constitutes consent. (People v. Sensano
and Ramos, G.R. No. L-37720, 1933)
c. Where there is connivance between the parties in the commission of the
offense or act constituting the ground for legal separation;
d. Where both parties have given ground for legal separation;
e. Where there is collusion between the parties to obtain decree of legal
separation; or
i. Collusion in matrimonial cases is the act of married persons in
procuring a divorce by mutual consent, whether by preconcerted
commission by one of a matrimonial offense, or by failure, in
pursuance of agreement, to defend divorce proceedings. (Brown v.
Yambao, G.R. No. L-10699, 1957)
f. Where the action is barred by prescription.
C. COOLING-OFF PERIOD
Rule: The case shall not be tried (on the merits) within six months from
the filing of the petition. To enable the contending spouses to settle their
differences.
Exception: If the ground for the petition constitutes “violence” as defined in
R.A. No. 9262 or the Anti-Violence Against Women and their Children Act.
D. RECONCILIATION EFFORTS
a. No legal separation may be decreed unless the Court has taken steps
toward the reconciliation of the spouses and is fully satisfied, despite such
efforts, that reconciliation is highly improbable. (Art. 59)
b. Consequences:
i. The legal separation proceedings, if still pending, shall thereby be
terminated at whatever stage; and
LEGAL SEPARATION 15
ii. The final decree of legal separation shall be set aside, but the separation
of property and any forfeiture of the share of the guilty spouse already
effected shall subsist, unless the spouses agree to revive their former
property regime. The court’s order containing the foregoing shall be
recorded in the proper civil registries. (108a)
Arroyo v Arroyo
42 PHIL 54
The court however cannot compel a spouse to live with the other spouse
if the latter does not want to as the said duties are highly personal. It is not
within the province of the courts of this country to attempt to compel one
of the spouses to cohabit with and render conjugal rights to the other. It
has been held that the wife’s domestic assistance and conjugal compan-
ionship are purely personal and voluntary acts which neither the spouses
may be compelled to render.
RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS BETWEEN HUSBAND AND WIFE
17
People v Jumawan
G.R. No. 187495, April 21, 2014
Husbands do not have property rights over their wives’ bodies. Sexual inter-
course, albeit within the realm of marriage, if not consensual, is rape.
Husband and wife are obliged to live together under one roof, observe mutual
love, respect and fidelity, and render mutual help and support. These marital
obligations are very essential that failure of a spouse to perform these obliga-
tions due to psychological causes could be considered a ground to nullify the
marriage under Article 36 of the Family Code. Procreation is one of the essen-
tial marital obligations.
d. The court cannot force them to comply with the obligations mandated
by law except for support.
Note:
Either spouse may exercise any legitimate profession, occupation,
business, or activity without the consent of the other. Under R.A. No.
9262, if the husband prevents his wife from engaging in any legitimate
profession, occupation, business, or activity, he has committed an act of
violence punishable by the said law, except in cases where the husband
objects on valid, serious, and moral grounds.
IV. PROPERTY RELATIONS BETWEEN HUSBAND AND WIFE
A. GENERAL PROVISIONS
MARRIAGE SETTLEMENTS
According to Art. 74, Property relations between husband and wife are governed:
1. By marriage settlements executed before the marriage;
2. By the provisions of this Code;
3. By the local custom.
Art. 75. The future spouses may, in the marriage settlements, agree upon the re-
gime of absolute community, conjugal partnership of gains, complete separation
of property, or any other regime. In the absence of marriage settlement, or when
the regime agreed upon is void, the system of absolute community of property
as established in this Code shall govern.
MARRIAGE SETTLEMENT
● An agreement entered into by parties about to be married for the purpose
of fixing the terms and conditions of their property relations during the
marriage. This is more popularly known as “prenuptial agreement.”
● Governed by Philippine law if both parties are Filipinos, regardless of the
place of the celebration of the marriage and their residence.
1. Made in writing
2. Signed by the parties
3. Executed before the marriage celebration
4. Not to prejudice third persons unless registered in the local civil registry
where the marriage is recorded and in registries of property
5. If executed by a person below 21 years, valid only when persons required
to give consent to the marriage (father, mother, or guardian, respectively)
are made parties to the agreement (Art. 78)
6. If executed by a person upon whom civil interdiction has been
pronounced or who is subject to any other disability, valid only when
his guardian appointed by a competent court is made party to the
agreement (Art. 79)
DONATIONS EXCLUDED
General rule: Future spouses who agree upon a regime other than ACP cannot
donate to each other more than 1/5 of their present property (excess shall be
considered void). (Art. 84)
GENERAL PROVISIONS
Article 88
The absolute community of property between spouses
shall commence at the precise moment that the marriage
is celebrated. Any stipulation, express or implied, for the
commencement of the community regime at any other
time shall be void. (145a)
Article 89
No waiver of rights, shares and effects of the absolute
community of property during the marriage can be
made except in case of judicial separation of property.
When the waiver takes place upon a judicial separation
of property, or after the marriage has been dissolved or
annulled, the same shall appear in a public instrument
and shall be recorded in the local civil registry where the
marriage contract is recorded as well as in the proper
registries of properties..
Article 77
The creditors of the spouse who made such waiver may
petition the court to rescind the waiver to the extent
of the amount sufficient to cover the amount of their
credits. (146a)
Article 90
The provisions on co-ownership shall apply to the
absolute community of property between the spouses
in all matters not provided for in this Chapter. (n)
22 PROPERTY RELATIONS BETWEEN HUSBAND AND WIFE
Note:
a. Absolute Community of Property Regime refers to a special kind of
co-ownership. The husband and the wife become joint owners of all
the properties of the marriage. Hence, the provisions on co-ownership
shall apply suppletory.
b. The Absolute Community of Property Regime shall commence at the
precise moment of the celebration of marriage. It cannot commence
during the marriage.
c. The spouses cannot waive their rights, interests, shares and effects in
the absolute community during the marriage except in case of judicial
separation of property.
Article 91
Unless otherwise provided in this Chapter or in the mar-
riage settlements, the community property shall consist
of all the property owned by the spouses at the time
of the celebration of the marriage or acquired thereaf-
ter. (197a)
Article 92
The following shall be excluded from the community
property:
1. Property acquired during the marriage by gratuitous
title by either spouse, and the fruits as well as the in-
come thereof, if any, unless it is expressly provided by
the donor, testator or grantor that they shall form part
of the community property;
2. Property for personal and exclusive use of either
spouse. However, jewelry shall form part of the com-
munity property;
3. Property acquired before the marriage by either spouse
who has legitimate descendants by a former marriage,
and the fruits as well as the income, if any, of such
property. (201a)
Article 93
Property acquired during the marriage is presumed to
belong to the community, unless it is proved that it is
one of those excluded therefrom. (160)
PROPERTY RELATIONS BETWEEN HUSBAND AND WIFE 23
a. As a general rule, all property that each spouse owned before the marriage
shall automatically be considered as part of the absolute community upon
the celebration of the marriage.
b. Property acquired during the marriage using the exclusive money of a
spouse shall become part of the absolute community because there is no
provision in the chapter that is similar to this principle.
Article 95
Whatever may be lost during the marriage in any game of chance
betting, sweepstakes, or any other kind of gambling, whether permitted
or prohibited by law, shall be borne by the loser and shall not be charged
to the community but any winnings there, from shall form part of the
community property. (164a)
a. If the community property is not enough to pay off all the obligations
mentioned in Article 94, the separate property of either spouses will have
to answer for it and their liability is solidary.
b. Personal obligations of a spouse that the absolute community may be
compelled to pay
i. Ante-nuptial debt which did not redound to the benefit of the family
ii. Support of illegitimate children
iii. Civil liability arising from crime or quasi-delict
c. A spouse who gambles or engages in any game of chance or betting
shall bear the loss and he cannot charge it to the absolute community.
However, if he wins, the winnings will become part of the community.
Article 96
The administration and enjoyment of the community property
shall belong to both spouses jointly. In case of disagreement, the
husband’s decision shall prevail, subject to recourse to the court by
the wife for proper remedy, which must be availed of within five
years from the date of the contract implementing such decision.
In the event that one spouse is incapacitated or otherwise unable to
participate in the administration of the common properties, the other
spouse may assume sole powers of administration. These powers
do not include disposition or encumbrance without authority of the
court or the written consent of the other spouse. In the absence of
such authority or consent, the disposition or encumbrance shall be
void. However, the transaction shall be construed as a continuing
offer on the part of the consenting spouse and the third person,
and may be perfected as a binding contract upon the acceptance
by the other spouse or authorization by the court before the offer
is withdrawn by either or both offerors. (206a)
Article 97
Either spouse may dispose by will of his or her interest in the
community property. (n)
PROPERTY RELATIONS BETWEEN HUSBAND AND WIFE 25
Article 98
Neither spouse may donate any community property without
the consent of the other. However, either spouse may, without
the consent of the other, make moderate donations from the
community property for charity or on occasions of family rejoicing
or family distress. (n)
B. The separation in fact between husband and wife shall not affect the
regime of absolute community
Exception:
1. The spouse who leaves the conjugal home or refuses to live therein,
without just cause, shall not have the right to be supported;
2. When the consent of one spouse to any transaction of the other is
required by law, judicial authorization shall be obtained in a summary
proceeding;
26 PROPERTY RELATIONS BETWEEN HUSBAND AND WIFE
D. Abandonment
● A spouse is deemed to have abandoned the other when her or she has
left the conjugal dwelling without intention of returning. The spouse
who has left the conjugal dwelling for a period of three months or has
failed within the same period to give any information as to his or her
whereabouts shall be prima facie presumed to have no intention of
returning to the conjugal dwelling.
○ Abandonment implies a departure by one spouse with the avowed
intent never to return, followed by a prolonged absence without just
cause.
ii. Under the present law, it will only apply if there is a marriage settlement
and it is the property regime agreed upon by the parties.
iii. What comprises the conjugal partnership
a. As a rule, only those properties acquired during the marriage through
the efforts or industry of either or both spouses as well as the income
or fruits of their exclusive properties that accrue during the marriage
will comprise the conjugal partnership
iv. Rules governing
a. The rules on partnership shall likewise apply to the conjugal partnership.
v. Void provision
a. Any stipulation which excludes the partners from any share of the
profits and losses of the partnership is void
1. Presumption
a. All property acquired during the marriage, whether the acquisition
appears to have been made, contracted or registered in the name of
one or both spouses, is presumed to be conjugal unless the contrary
is proved.
b. For this presumption to apply, it is condition sine qua non that proof
of its acquisition during the marriage is duly established (Jocson v CA,
170 SCRA 333).
2. Conjugal Properties
a. The following are conjugal partnership properties:
1. Those acquired by onerous title during the marriage at the
expense of the common fund, whether the acquisition be for the
partnership, or for only one of the spouses;
2. Those obtained from the labor, industry, work or profession of
either or both of the spouses;
3. The fruits, natural, industrial, or civil, due or received during the
marriage from the common property, as well as the net fruits from
the exclusive property of each spouse;
● the fruits of exclusive properties of either spouse is considered
conjugal only if it accrued during the marriage and the fruit is
called net fruits
4. The share of either spouse in the hidden treasure which the law
awards to the finder or owner of the property where the treasure
is found;
5. Those acquired through occupation such as fishing or hunting;
30 PROPERTY RELATIONS BETWEEN HUSBAND AND WIFE
1. The husband and wife are joint administrators of the conjugal partnership.
a. In case one is incapacitated, the other spouse may assume the sole
power of administration
b. In case of incapacity or inability to participate of one spouse, the
powers do not include disposition or encumbrance without authority
of the court or the written consent of the other spouse
c. Where the husband sold a conjugal partnership property without the
knowledge and onset of the wise, the sale is void (Sps. Antonio Guiang
v CA, G.R. No. 125172, June 26, 1998).
d. If the sale was with the knowledge but without the approval of the
wife, thereby resulting in disagreement, such sale is annulable at the
instance of the wife who is given five years from the date the contract
implementing the decision of the husband to institute the case (Sps.
Ravina v Villa Abrille, et. al., G.R. No. 160708, October 16, 2009).
Barrido v Nonato
G.R. No. 176492, October 20, 2014
SEPARATION OF PROPERTY
When it applies Agreed upon in the marriage settlements by the
spouses
Mandatory under Arts. 103 & 130, FC (subsequent
marriages contracted by a surviving spouse with-
out judicial settlement of previous property re-
gime)
Judicial separation of property (Voluntary or just
cause)
Default property regime when there is reconcilia-
tion between spouses after judicial separation of
property
What it consists of Present or future property or both
Each spouse’s earnings from his or her own pro-
fession, business, or industry
Natural, industrial or civil fruits of spouse’s sepa-
rate properties
May be total or partial. If partial, property not con-
sidered separate is presumed to pertain to the
ACP
Liabilities Family expenses: Both spouses are liable in pro-
portion to their income; if insufficient, based on
the current value of their separate properties
Creditors for family expenses: Spouses solidarily
liable
36 PROPERTY RELATIONS BETWEEN HUSBAND AND WIFE
I. Each spouse shall own, administer, use, and enjoy his or her exclusive
property to the exclusion of the other. Each spouse has control and
ownership of his or her own properties which will include “all earnings
from his or her profession, business or industry and all fruits, natural,
industrial or civil, due or received during the marriage from his or her
separate property.” Expenses of the family shall be shouldered by
the spouses in proportion to their income, or, in case of insufficiency
or default thereof, to the current market value of their separate
properties.
I. ARTICLE 147
A. They have an informal civil relationship that entitles the parties
to some rights.
B. Presumption that properties acquired while they lived together
have been obtained by their joint efforts, work or industry, and
shall be owned by them in equal shares.
Luna v Zaballero-Luna
G.R. No. 171914, July 23, 2014
When the marriage is void because one party has the legal im-
pediment to marry the other is in the case of bigamous marriage,
the property relation of the parties shall be governed by co-own-
ership under Article 148 of the Famile Code where actual contri-
bution must be proven.
V. THE FAMILY
I. Paternity and Filiation refer to the relationship or tie which exists between
parents and their children
A. Paternity- refers to the status of the father in relation his his child
B. Maternity- refers to the status of the mother in relation to her child
C. Filiation- refers to the status of a child in relation to his parents
II. Under the New Family Code, there are only two classes of children:
A. Legitimate Children
B. Illegitimate Children
C. Legitimated Children
A. LEGITIMATE CHILDREN
I. The children who are born during the lawful marriage
IV. DNA
A. The latest and most effective method of determining filiation is
through DNA test
B. The process for DNA paternity testing had an accuracy rate of
99.99% in establishing paternity. It was first accepted as evidence
by the Supreme Court in the case of Tijing v CA.
PATERNITY AND FILIATION 43
V. Rules Governing in Case of Two Marriages
A. If the marriage is terminated and the mother contracted another
marriage within three hundred days after such termination of
the former marriage, these rules shall govern in the absence of
proof to the contrary:
1. A child born before one hundred eighty days after the
solemnization of the subsequent marriage is considered to
have been conceived during the former marriage, provided
it be born within three hundred days after the termination of
the former marriage;
2. A child born after one hundred eighty days following the
celebration of the subsequent marriage is considered to have
been conceived during such marriage, even though it be born
within the three hundred days after the termination of the
former marriage. (259a)
B. PROOF OF FILIATION
I. Primary Proof of Filiation
A. The record of birth appearing in the civil register or a final judgment;
or proof that comes from an official government source
● It has been held that if the alleged father did not sign in the
birth certificate, the placing of his name by the mother, or
doctor or registrar, is incompetent evidence of paternity of
said child (Berciles vs. GSIS, 128 SCRA 53; Reyes vs. Court of
Appeals, 135 SCRA 439).
B. An admission of legitimate filiation in a public document or
a private handwritten instrument and signed by the parent
concerned.
C. ILLEGITIMATE CHILDREN
I. The children born out of wedlock or inside a void marriage
A. Exceptions:
1. Children of marriages void under Art. 36 (psychological
incapacity); and
2. Under Art. 53 (subsequent marriages which did not comply
with Art. 52)
III. Rights
A. Entitled to the same hereditary right and shall carry the surname
of the father.
VII. ADOPTION
I. Repealed Provisions
A. The provisions on Adoption found in Article 183 to 193 (Title VII) of
the Family Code has already been repealed by R.A. 8552 approved
on February 25, 1998 by Pres. Fidel V. Ramos. Furthermore, there
is another law which amended our law on adoption and that is the
Inter-Country Adoption Law of 1995 or R.A. 8043 approved by
Pres. Ramos on June 7, 1995. Thus, our present law on adoption is
now primarily governed by R.A. 8552 and R.A. 8043.
Our present law on adoption holds the paramount interest and welfare of the
child to be adopted and is designed to provide these children a brighter future.
C. Foundlings
Foundling shall refer to a deserted or abandoned infant or a child found, with
parents, guardian, or relatives being unknown, or a child committed in an
orphanage or charitable or similar institution with unknown facts of birth and
parentage and registered in the Civil Register as a foundling. [Sec. 3(h), Rules
And Regulations To Implement The Domestic Adoption Act Of 1998]
If efforts to locate the child’s parent/s fail, the child shall be registered as
a foundling and within three (3) months from the time he/she is found,
be the subject of legal proceedings where he/she shall be declared
abandoned. [Sec. 5, Rules And Regulations To Implement The Domestic
Adoption Act Of 1998]
Poe-Llamanzares v. COMELEC
G.R. No. 22169 (2016)
Domestic laws on adoption also support the principle that foundlings are
Filipinos. These laws do not provide that adoption confers citizenship upon
the adoptee. Rather, the adoptee must be a Filipino in the first place to be
adopted. The Inter-Country Adoption Act (R.A. No. 8043), the Domestic
Adoption Act (R.A. No. 8552) and the Court’s A.M. No. 02- 6-02-SC or the
“Rule on Adoption,” all expressly refer to “Filipino children” and include
foundlings as among Filipino children who may be adopted.
D. Pre-Adoption Procedures
a. Voluntary commitment by biological parent(s) wanting to put their child
up for adoption
1. Counseling on their options other than adoption
2. Explaining to them the implications of losing their parental authority
over the child
3. Continuing services shall be provided after relinquishment to cope
with feelings of loss, etc. and other services for the reintegration to the
community of the biological parent(s)
4. Biological parent(s) who decided to put the child for adoption shall sign
the Deed of Voluntary Commitment (DVC), which shall be rescissible
within 3 months from signing of the same
E. Adoption Procedures
Note: DSWD must certify the child as legally available for adoption as a
prerequisite for adoption proceedings. [RA 9253]
● After the decree of adoption, the court may also issue a travel authority,
if needed.
● The case study report by the DSWD/LGU is indispensable. Without it, the
adoption decree shall be void. (DSWD v. Judge Belen, RTJ-96-1362, 1997)
While an adopted child has the same rights as a legitimate child, these rights
do not include the right of representation. The relationship created by the
adoption is between only the adopting parents and the adopted child and
does not extend to the blood relatives of either party. [Sayson v. CA, supra]
Since many biological parents relinquish their child for adoption by reason
of poverty or emotional unpreparedness, their biological child should not
be prevented from inheriting if they were able to improve their lot. There
is nothing that precludes the biological parents to give their biological child
his or her rightful share in their last will and testament.
While an effect of adoption is that the adoptee shall bear the surname of the adopter,
the change of surname of the adopted child is more an incident rather than the
object of adoption proceedings. The purpose of adoption is to effect a new status
of relationship between the child and his or her adoptive parents, and the change of
name is more of an incident only than the object of the proceeding.
Sec. 13 of RA 8552 allows the change of first name to be instituted in the same
proceeding as the adoption: “the decree of adoption shall state the name by
which the child is to be known.”
The law is silent as to what middle name the adoptee may use but the SC has held
that an adoptee is entitled to all the rights provided by law to a legitimate child, in-
cluding the right to bear the surname of her father and mother.
5. Nationality
Adoption does not confer citizenship of the adopter to the adopted. Under
Sec. 3, Art. IV of the Constitution, Philippine citizenship may be lost/
acquired [only] in the manner provided by law. The adoption of an alien is
not a means of acquiring Philippine citizenship. A Filipino adopted by an
alien does not lose his Philippine citizenship.
The right to confer citizenship belongs to the State (political) and cannot
be granted by a citizen through adoption. Adoption creates a relationship
between the adopter and adoptee, not between the State and the adoptee.
[Tolentino]
H. Rescission of Adoption
Adoptee may file action for rescission, with the assistance of DSWD if he/
she is a minor or over 18 but incapacitated, based on the following grounds
[Sec. 19, RA 8552]:
1. Repeated physical and verbal maltreatment by adopters despite having
undergone counseling
2. Attempt on life of adoptee
3. Sexual assault or violence
4. Abandonment or failure to comply with parental obligations
Adoption, being in the best interest of the child, shall not be subject to
rescission by the adopter. However, the adopter may disinherit the child
based on causes enumerated in Art. 919 of CC:
1. Conviction of an attempt on the life of the adopter
2. Having accused, without grounds, the adopter of a crime punishable by
imprisonment for more than 6 years
54 ADOPTION
Three-in-one Procedure
● Correction of entries in birth certificate
● Deed of Voluntary Commitment or
● Declaration of abandonment
● Adoption decree
ADOPTION 55
Sec. 8 of the SC Rule on Adoption requires that the petition that seeks to
rectify a simulated birth allege that:
1. Petitioner is applying for rectification of a simulated birth;
2. The simulation of birth was made prior to the date of effectivity of RA
8552 and the application for rectification of the birth registration and
the petition for adoption were filed within five years from said date;
3. The petitioner made the simulation of birth for the best interests of the
adoptee; and
4. The adoptee has been consistently considered and treated by the
petitioner as his own child.
A. When Allowed
No child shall be matched to a foreign adoptive family unless it can be
satisfactorily shown that the child cannot be adopted locally [Sec. 11,
RA 8043].
i. Sec. 12, RA 8043. The applicant(s) shall bear the following costs
incidental to the placement of the child;
(a) The cost of bringing the child from the Philippines to the
residence of the applicant(s) abroad, including all travel expenses
within the Philippines and abroad; and
(b) The cost of passport, visa, medical examination and psychological
evaluation required, and other related expenses.
The Inter-Country Adoption Board shall also collect fees, charges, and
assessments [Sec.13].
4. Applicant’s Acceptance
Once the matching proposal is approved, a notice of matching shall be
sent to the concerned Central Authority or foreign adoption agency
within five (5) days.
The applicant/s shall notify the Central Authority or Foreign Adoption
Agency (FAA) in writing of their decision on the matching proposal
within fifteen (15) working days from receipt of said proposal.
7. Trial Custody
Trial custody begins upon the physical transfer of the child to the
applicant who, as custodian, shall exercise substitute parental
authority over the child. [Sec. 44, RA 8043 Amended IRR]
The trial custody shall last for six (6) months during which the Central
Authority and/or the FAA shall be responsible for the pre-adoptive
placement, care and family counseling of the child. [Sec. 45, RA
8043 Amended IRR]
Any serious ailment, injury or abuse of the child from the adoptive
parent(s) or from other household members or the adoptive parent(s)
suffer from any serious ailment or injury that will make the adoption
untenable shall be reported to the Board.
In the event that all efforts to restore the parent-child relationship
between the child and applicant/s fail, the placement may be
terminated and the child may be given a new placement or repatriated.
[Secs. 46, 48, 49, RA 8043 Amended IRR]
9. Decree of Adoption
A copy of the final Decree of Adoption or its equivalent shall be
transmitted by the Central Authority and/or the FAA to the Board
within one (1) month after its issuance. [Sec. 52, RA 8043 Amended
IRR]
Tamargo v. CA
G.R. No.85044 (1992)
Where the petition for adoption was granted after the child had shot and
killed a girl, the Supreme Court did not consider the retroactive effect given
to the decree of adoption so as to impose a liability upon the adopting par-
ents at a time when the adopting parents had no actual
or physical custody over the child. Retroactive effect may perhaps be given
where such is essential to permit the accrual of some benefit or advantage
in favor of the adopted child. In the instant case, however, to hold that pa-
rental authority had been retroactively lodged in the adopting parents so
as to burden them with liability for a tortious act that they could not have
foreseen and which they could not have prevented would be unfair and
unconscionable.
ADOPTION 59
Lazatin v. Campos
G.R. No. L-54955-54 (1979)
I. Composition
a. Sustenance or Food;
b. Dwelling;
c. Clothing;
d. Medical Attendance;
e. Education; which shall include his schooling or training for some
profession, trade or vocation, even beyond the age of majority,
f. Transportation.
De Asis v CA
303 SCRA 176
The Supreme Court ruled that the compromise agreement entered into
by the mother whereby she renounced the claim of support for her son
from the defendant who denied paternity subject to the condition that
said defendant will not pursue his counterclaim, is not valid.
SUPPORT 61
Sanchez v Zulueta
68 PHIL. 110
A child born out of an adulterous relationship of the wife and another
man is not entitled to support from the husband. A valid defense to re-
fuse support by a husband to a child claiming support is when the child
is the fruit of an adulterous relationship of the wife, for in such case, the
child is not that of the person from whom support is demanded
III. Amount
a. shall be in proportion to the resources or means of the giver and to the
necessities of the recipient.
I. Parental Authority is the sum total of the rights of parents over the person
and property of their unemancipated children. Parental authority refers to
the right and duty of parents under the law to protect their children, to care
for them in sickness and in health, and to do whatever may be necessary for
their care, maintenance and preservation.
A. GENERAL PROVISIONS
I. Joint Parental Authority
A. Parental authority shall be exercised jointly by the father and the
mother over the person and property of their common children.
B. Requisites:
1. the paternity is certain; and
2. the father and the mother of the illegitimate child must be
living together under one roof with the child.
C. Child above 7 years old- the child is given the right to choose
but the choice of the child may be overruled by the court if it
finds the same to be not in the best interest of the child
I. Parents in Default
A. In default of parents or a judicially appointed guardian, the
following person shall exercise substitute parental authority
over the child in the order indicated:
1. The surviving grandparent, as provided in Article 214;
2. The oldest brother or sister, over twenty-one years of age,
unless unfit or disqualified; and
64 PARENTAL AUTHORITY
B. In case of disagreement
General Rule: The father’s decision shall prevail.
Exception: Unless there is judicial order to the contrary
66 PARENTAL AUTHORITY
I. When Terminated
A. Upon the death of the parents;
B. Upon the death of the child; or
C. Upon emancipation of the child.
Bikol Branch
Door 11 Dona Elena Apartments
J. Miranda Ave., Naga City 4400, Philippines
E-mail: [email protected]
Mindanaw Branch
Door 1, 422 Champaca St.,
Juan Subd., Matina, Davao City 8000, Philippines
Tel No.(+63) (82)2894161
Email: [email protected]
SALIGAN
SALIGAN seeks to effect social change by working with
women, the basic sectors, and local communities for
their empowerment through the creative use of law
and legal resources.