Chapter 6 - Fundamentals of Credit Analysis
Chapter 6 - Fundamentals of Credit Analysis
• Credit Risk
• Capital Structure, Seniority Ranking and Recovery Rates
• Rating Agencies, Credit Ratings, and their role in Debt Markets
• Traditional Credit analysis for Corporate Debt Securities
• Credit Risk vs Return : Yield and Spreads
Fundamentals of Credit Analysis
Credit Risk
• Credit risk is the risk of borrower not making timely and full
payments of interest or principal.
• The most senior or highest-ranking debt will have the rst claim
on the cash ows and assets of the issuer.
Senior Unsecured
Senior Subordinated
Subordinated
• All debt within same category is said to rank pari passu, or have
same priority of claims.
• Recovery rates are highest for debt with the highest priority.
• Recovery rates can vary widely by industry.
• Recovery rates can also vary depending on when they occur in
a credit cycle.
• In practice, however :
• Creditors with lower seniority and even shareholders may receive
some consideration without more senior creditors being paid in
full.
• Rating agencies rate both the issuer and the debt issues.
• Issuer credit ratings are called corporate family ratings (CFR).
• Issue-speci c ratings are called corporate credit ratings (CCR).
• Three major global rating agencies are :
1. Moody’s
2. S&P
3. Fitch
fi
Fundamental of Credit Analysis
Credit Ratings
• Bonds rated triple-A (Aaa or AAA) are said to be “of the highest
quality, with minimal credit risk” and thus have extremely low
probabilities of default.
ff
Fundamental of Credit Analysis
Issuer vs. Issue Ratings
I. Default risk
• Notching is less common for highly rated issuers than for lower-rated
issuers
ff
fi
ff
Fundamental of Credit Analysis
Issuer vs. Issue Ratings
• Cross-default provisions:
• Provisions whereby non-payment of interest on one bond
trigger default on all outstanding debt.
• Structural subordination:
• Debt at the operating subsidiaries will get serviced by the cash
ow and assets of the subsidiaries before funds can be passed
(“up streamed”) to the holding company to service debt at that
level.
fl
Fundamental of Credit Analysis
Credit Ratings
• Several factors have led to the near universal use of credit ratings in the
bond markets are:
• Using the S&P ratings scale, investment grade bonds carry which of the
following ratings?
A. AAA to EEE
B. BBB- to CCC
C. AAA to BBB-
• Using both Moody's and S&P ratings, which of the following pairs of ratings is
considered high yield, also known as "below investment grade,” "speculative
grade, or “junk”?
A. Baa1/BBB-
B. B3/CCC+
C. Baa3/BB+
Concept Revision
Practice Questions
• Based on the practice of notching by the rating agencies, a subordinated bond from a
company with an issuer rating of BB would likely carry what rating?
A. B+
B. BB
C. BBB-
• The xed-income portfolio manager you work with asked you why a bond from an
issuer you cover didn't rise in price when it was upgraded by Fitch from B+ to BB.
Which of the following is the most likely explanation?
B. The bond doesn't trade often so the price hasn't adjusted to the rating change yet.
C. The market was expecting the rating change, and so it was already "priced in" to
the bond.
fi
Concept Revision
Practice Questions
• Amalgamated Corp. and Widget Corp. each have bonds outstanding with
similar coupons and maturity dates. Both bonds are rated B2, B-, and B
by Moody's, S&P, and Fitch, respectively. The bonds, however, trade at
very di erent prices-the Amalgamated bond trades at €89, whereas the
Widget bond trades at €62. What is the most likely explanation of the price
(and yield) di erence?
B. The bonds have similar risks of default (as re ected in the ratings), but
the market believes the Amalgamated bond has a higher expected
loss in the event of default.
C. The bonds have similar risks of default (as re ected in the ratings), but
the market believes the Widget bond has a higher expected recovery
ff
ff
fl
fl
Fundamental of Credit Analysis
Traditional Credit analysis for Corporate Debt Securities
Credit analysts
Equity analysts will focus more on
tend to focus more on the balance sheet
income and cash ow statements.
and cash ow statements
fl
ff
fl
Fundamental of Credit Analysis
Traditional Credit analysis for Corporate Debt Securities
• Capacity.
• Collateral.
• Covenants.
• Character.
Traditional Credit analysis for Corporate Debt Securities
Capacity
• Industry Cyclicality
• Cyclical industries are sensitive to economic performance, tend
to have more volatile earnings, revenues and cash ows.
• Competitive position
• Market share and cost structure relative to peers.
• Operating history
• Performance history over di erent phases of business cycle, trends in
margins and revenues, and current management tenure.
C. They are not very pro table and need to borrow heavily to
maintain their plant and equipment.
fi
fl
Concept Revision
Industry and Company Analysis
Collateral
Collateral
Covenants
Covenants
Character
Character Analysis
• Soundness of strategy
• Management’s ability to develop a sound strategy.
• Track Record
• Management’s past performance in executing its strategies.
• Company operation without bankruptcy, restructuring, or other
distress.
Traditional Credit analysis for Corporate Debt Securities
Character Analysis
Character Analysis
B. Loss severity.
C. Recovery rate.
Concept Revision
Practice Questions
B. character.
C. collateral.
Evaluating Credit Quality
Credit analysis with ratios
• Four pro t and cash ow metrics are commonly used in ratio analysis.
1. Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization
(EBITDA)
1. Debt/Capital
2. Debt/EBITDA
3. FFO/Debt
1. EBITDA/Interest Expense
2. EBIT/Interest Expense
Total Capital
excluding $ 35,00,000 $ 65,00,000 $ 58,00,000
goodwill
Example - Credit analysis based on ratios
Leverage and Coverage ratios
EBIT
• Interest :
$550000
Yape : = 13.8x
$40000
$2250000
Zuari : = 14.1x
$160000
$140000
Industry Average : = 14.0x
$100000
Both Yape and Zuari have interest coverage in line with their industry
average.
Example - Credit analysis based on ratios
Leverage and Coverage ratios
FFO
• TotalDebt :
$300000
Yape : = 15.8 %
$1900000
$850000
Zuari : = 31.5 %
$2700000
$600000
Industry Average : = 23.1 %
$2600000
Zuari’s FFO relative to its debt level are greater than the industry average.
Example - Credit analysis based on ratios
Leverage and Coverage ratios
TotalDebt
(Including Goodwill) :
• TotalCapital
$1900000
Yape : = 47.5 %
$4000000
$2700000
Zuari : = 41.5 %
$6500000
$2600000
Industry Average : = 43.3 %
$6000000
Example - Credit analysis based on ratios
Leverage and Coverage ratios
TotalDebt
(Excluding Goodwill) :
• TotalCapital
$1900000
Yape : = 54.3 %
$3500000
$2700000
Zuari : = 41.5 %
$6500000
$2600000
Industry Average : = 44.8 %
$5800000
Yape is more leveraged than Zuari and the industry average, especially after
adjusting for goodwill.
Example
Credit analysis based on ratios
• Conclusion
• Based on ratio calculations, Zuari Inc. appears to be more
creditworthy than Yape Inc.
Fundamentals of Credit Analysis
Credit Risk vs Return : Yields and Spreads
Taxation
Credit Risk
Expected
“Risk-Free” In ation Rate
Benchmark Rate of
Return Expected
Real Rate
fl
Fundamentals of Credit Analysis
Credit Risk vs Return : Yields and Spreads
1. Credit Cycle
V. Poor management
V. Covenants.
• The lower the ranking in the debt structure, the lower the credit
rating and the lower the expected recovery in the event of
default.
2. Restricted payment
3. Limitations on liens
• This covenant is meant to put limits on how much secured debt an issuer
can have.
2. Economic prospects
• includes the country’s foreign reserves, its external debt, and the
status of its currency in international markets.
ff
fi
Fundamentals of Credit Analysis
Sovereign Debt Analysis
• A basic framework
4. Fiscal exibility
5. Monetary exibility
A. company’s strategy.
A. construction company.
B. beverage company.
4. In the event of default, which of the following is most likely to have the
highest recovery rate?
A. Second lien
B. Senior unsecured
C. Senior subordinated
5. The process of moving credit ratings of di erent issues up or down from the
issuer rating in response to di erent payment priorities is best described as:
A. notching.
B. structural subordination.
C. cross-default provisions.
ff
ff
Concept Revision
Practice Questions
C. structural subordination.
Thank You