Lecture 6 Environmental Accounting
Lecture 6 Environmental Accounting
Introduction
The growth of environmental issues and regulations has also brought greater focus on
how businesses manage and account for environmental costs.
(1) Identifying environmental costs associated with individual products and services can
assist with pricing decisions.
2. In the past, environmental costs such as energy costs were treated as production overheads and
effectively hidden from management scrutiny.
3. Society has become more environmentally aware with 'carbon footprint' becoming a
recognised term. A carbon footprint measures the total greenhouse gas emissions caused directly and
indirectly by a person, organisation, event or product.
(a) Environmental costs are becoming huge for some companies. Once identified,
environmental costs can be controlled and reduced.
(b) There is increasing worldwide regulation and a need for regulatory reporting of
environmental costs.
(c) Ethical issues – businesses should be aware of how their production methods will
affect the environment (eg carbon emissions).
(d) Improved brand image – 'green' ways of doing business can be a selling point.
(e) Associating environmental costs with individual products will lead to more accurate
pricing and improved profitability.
Hansen and Mendoza (1999) suggested that environmental costs could be classified
as:
3
(a) Environmental prevention costs: the costs of activities undertaken to prevent the
production of waste eg environmental training.
(b) Environmental detection costs: costs incurred to ensure that the organisation
complies with regulations and voluntary standards eg record keeping and recording.
(c) Environmental internal failure costs: costs incurred from performing activities that
have produced contaminants and waste that have not been discharged into the
environment eg waste disposal costs.
(d) Environmental external failure costs: costs incurred on activities performed after
discharging waste into the environment.
Much business activity takes place at the cost of the environment, and some of these costs are felt by
society as a whole. Externalised costs are those for which wider society has to 'pay' at least an element –
eg global warming.
Martin Bennett and Peter James looked at ways in which a Company’s concern for
the environment can impact on its performance.
(1) Short term savings through waste minimization and energy efficiency schemes can
be substantial.
(2) Increased Cost of Capital because investors and lenders demand higher risk
premium for companies with poor environmental performance.
(3) Energy and Environmental taxes are incurred such as UK’s landfill tax on waste
disposal.
(4) Pressure Group Campaigns can cause damage to reputation or additional costs.
(5) Environmental legislation may cause the ‘sunsetting’ of products and opportunities
for ‘sunrise replacements’.
(6) The cost of processing input which becomes waste is equivalent to 5-10% of some
Organizations revenue.
Martin Bennett and Peter James suggests six (6) main ways in which business and
environmental benefits can be achieved.
(3) Introducing Waste Minimization Schemes. Such schemes may result in the
reduction or avoidance of pollution control expenditure.
(4) Understanding and Managing Life Cycle Costs. For many products, the greatest
environmental impact occurs upstream e.g. raw materials or downstream from
production e.g. energy to operate equipment. Organizations need to identify, control and
make provision for environmental life cycle costs and work with suppliers and customers
to identify environmental cost reduction opportunities.
(ii) Assessing whether new data sources are needed to collect more and better data.
Such analysis and action should help organizations to better understand present and
future environmental costs and benefits.
Environmental Costs
(1) Conventional Costs, such as raw material and energy costs, have an impact on the
environment.
(2) Potentially hidden costs are relevant costs that are captured within accounting
systems but may be ‘hidden’ within general overheads.
(3) Contingent costs are costs that will be incurred at a future date as a result of
discharging waste into the environment such as clean-up costs.
(4) Image and relationship costs are costs incurred to preserve the reputation of the
business; e.g. the costs of preparing environmental reports to ensure compliance with
regulatory standards.
Function Description
(1) Environmental review A first review of environmental impacts of materials,
and policy development issues and products and of business issues arising, as
well as the development of a tailored in-house policy or
measures to ensure adherence to external standards.
(2) Objectives and target Objectives and targets should be set unambiguous and
development achievable. Targets should be quantified within a
specified time period e.g. reduce carbon emissions by X
% within a specified time period.
(3) Life cycle assessment This aims to identify all interactions between a product
and its environment during its lifetime, including energy
and material usage and environmental releases.
Raw material used have to be traced back to the
biosphere and the company recognizes impact
on habitat, gas balance, the energy used in the
extraction and transportation and the energy
used to produce the means of extraction
ISO 14000
ISO 14000 was first published in 1996 and based on earlier quality management
standards. It provides a general framework on which a number of specific standards
have been based. ISO 14001 prescribes that an environmental management system
must comprise:
Critics of ISO 14001 claim that its emphasis on management systems rather than
performance is misplaced, and it does not include rigorous verification and disclosure
requirements.
The United Nations Division for Sustainable Development (UNDSD, 2003) identified a
number of management accounting techniques to account for Environmental Costs
which are as follows:
This technique records material inflows and balances this with outflows on the basis that
what comes in, must go out. So, if 100 kg of materials have been bought and only 80 kg
of materials have been produced, for example, then the 20 kg difference must be
accounted for in some way. It may be, for example, that 10% of it has been sold as
scrap and 10% of it is waste. By accounting for outputs in this way, both in terms of
physical quantities and, at the end of the process, in monetary terms too, businesses
are forced to focus on environmental costs.
This technique uses not only material flows but also the organisational structure. It
makes material flows transparent by looking at the physical quantities involved, their
costs and their value. It divides the material flows into three categories:
material, system and delivery, and disposal. The values and costs of each of these
three flows are then calculated. The aim of flow cost accounting is to reduce the
quantity of materials which, as well as having a positive effect on the environment,
should have a positive effect on a business’s total costs in the long run.
9
ABC allocates internal costs to cost centres and cost drivers on the basis of the
activities which give rise to the costs. In an environmental accounting context, it
distinguishes between environment-related costs, which can be attributed to joint cost
centres, and environment-driven costs, which tend to be hidden in general overheads.
Environmental costs would be grouped together into environmental cost pools, and
each pool would be associated with an environmental cost driver.
Individual products that passed through the most polluting processes would therefore
absorb more environmental costs than cleaner or more 'green' products.
Within the context of environmental accounting, life cycle costing is a technique which
requires the full environmental consequences, and therefore costs, arising from
production of a product to be taken account of across its whole life cycle,
‘from cradle to grave’.
Environmental costs are considered from the design stage of a new product right up to the end of life costs
such as decommissioning and removal.
The consideration of future disposal or remediation costs at the design stage may influence the design of
the product itself, saving on future costs.