Bio462 Exp 2
Bio462 Exp 2
BIOCHEMISTRY
ii. The intensity of light passing through the sample solution (I) is
measured. In practice, instruments measure the power rather than
the intensity of the light.
iii. Calculation involved two quantities: the transmittance (T) and the
absorbance (A)
T = I/I0
A = - log10 T
BIURET METHOD
Under alkaline conditions copper reacts with the peptide bond to form
a purple complex (biuret complex) that is stabilized by the tetrate
molecule. Although relatively incentive, the technique is easy and
fairly consistent results with different proteins. Other amine
containing compounds and ammonium salts do interfere with this
analysis as do highly acidic solutions.
BRADFORD METHOD
MATERIALS ● Spectrophotometer
● Calibration cuvette
● Distilled water
METHODS Biuret Method
Reagent Preparation
1. Sodium potassium tartrate was placed into 1 liter volumetric
flask and was dissolved in about 400 mL of 0.2 M NaOH.
2. The mixture was stored in a plastic bottle.
Procedure
1. 1.5 ml of the Biuret reagent was added to each test tube.
2. 1.0 ml of the unknown or BSA was added to the test tube.
3. Each test tube was mixed and incubated at room temperature
for 30 minutes.
4. Read the OD at 555 nm.
Bradford Method
Reagent Preparation
1. An amount of 100mg of Coomassie Brilliant Blue G-250 was
dissolved in 50 mL of 95% ethanol.
2. 100 mL of 85% H3PO4 was added and mixed.
3. Diluted to a final volume of 1000 mL with water.
Procedure
1. 3.0 mL of the Bradford reagent was added to each test tube.
2. BSA with 4 different concentrations which are 0.1mg/ml, 0.2
mg/ml, 0.3 mg/ml and 0.4 mg/ml was diluted for 10% by
mixing 0.02 ml of BSA with 0.08 ml of distilled water.
3. Each test tube was mixed and incubated at room temperature
for 5 minutes.
4. Read the OD at 595 nm.
Lowry Method
Reagent Preparation
1. One volume of reagent B (0.5% copper sulfate pentahydrate,
1% sodium or potassium tartrate) was mixed with 50 volumes
of reagent A (2% sodium carbonate, 0.4% NaOH). This was
the mixture for Reagent 1.
2. Folin-Ciocalteu phenol reagent was mixed with an equal
volume of water. This is the mixture for Reagent 2.
Procedure
1. 0.25 ml of BSA was mixed with 2.5 ml of Lowry reagent 1.
2. 0.25 ml of Lowry reagent 2 was added and mixed well after
10 minutes.
3. The absorbance was measured at 750 nm after 30 minutes.
Blank= 0.023
Unknown=0.032
Concentrati OD OD OD Mean +-
on of BSA (replicate (replicate (replicate S.D
1) 2) 3)
BRADFORD METHOD
Blank=0.121
Unknown=1.865
Concentrati OD OD OD Mean +-
on of BSA (replicate (replicate (replicate S.D
1) 2) 3)
LOWRY METHOD
Blank=0.082
Unknown=0.208
Concentrati OD OD OD Mean +-
on of BSA (replicate (replicate (replicate S.D
1) 2) 3)
The Bradford method used the BSA concentration with lower amount
of concentration with 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, and 0.4 mg/mL and resulted with
the average absorbance value of 1.001,1.019,1.075 and 1.3437
respectively.The blank sample is 0.078.It shows that the lower the
amount of concentration gives the lower reading of the absorbance.
The method is dependent on the amino acid composition of the
measured protein and it is more efficient than other methods as it
involves fewer mixing steps, no heating required and it gives a more
stable colorimetric response. It is proved as a graph by the Bradford
method is directly proportional with the absorbance against the
concentration.There is no fluctuation value of the absorbance when
using the Bradford method compared with the Lowry and Biuret
method.
The result indicated that the BSA concentration for 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, and
0.4 mg/mL when used the Lowry method comes with a value of the
average absorbance of 0.114, 0.236, 0.261 and 0.310 respectively.
The value of blank is 0.082. The value of absorbance decreases
slightly at concentration of 0.4 mg/mL. The result was to observe that
the Lowry method is more sensitive than the Biuret method. It is
based on Cu+ produced by oxidation of peptide bonds with the
Folin-Ciocalteu reagent.
A lot of factors can cause the error in the experiment and are
classified based on the 2 types of error which are random error and
systematic error. The spectrometer may not be calibrated properly or
it happened when pipetting the reagents and the dye which can
cause problems such as inaccurate mixing and addition of the
solutions. Spectrophotometer should be down to the zero point by the
reagent blank since it can be a very big factor for error in the
experiment. Besides that, the random error can occur due to the
personal error for instance when the test tube used is not clean
enough or due to the inaccurate amount of volume of solution which
causes inadequacy and slightly diluted the solution prepared.
CONCLUSIONS In conclusion, the Bradford technique appears to be the best method
in determining protein determination. The objectives of the
experiment to determine the protein by using Biuret, Lowry and
Bradford method by using the spectrophotometer was achieved.
Bradford method is the most convenient compared to Biuret and
Lowry method as Bradford method gives accurate reading, simple,
fast and high sensitivity. It also shows that the graph of the
absorbance is directly proportional against the BSA concentration
without any fluctuation value.
REFERENCES Which protein assay is best for you? (2021, August 10). Azure
Biosystems.
https://azurebiosystems.com/blog/protein-assay-best/