Jha 2009
Jha 2009
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: A low-cost miniaturized flow-through device was fabricated using conventional photolithographic tech-
Received 31 March 2009 nique for lysis of whole cells using electrochemically generated hydroxyl groups. The device used low
Received in revised form 17 June 2009 impedance Au-interdigitated electrode (IDE) fabricated on glass substrate to input DC potential to the
Accepted 19 June 2009
overlaid PDMS based microchannel. The lysis of human cell line MCF-10A could be achieved between
Available online 25 June 2009
2 and 5 V of DC input with optimum release of genomic DNA at 5 V for 5 min, which is the lowest poten-
tial range reported in any such study. The lysate was extracted to confirm release of genomic DNA and
PACS:
was successfully tested for PCR grade purity of DNA by amplifying a known tumor suppressor gene
87.85.dh
SMAD4. The proposed method was non-destructive for biocomponents due to absence of Joule heating
Keywords: and shall find use in miniaturized PCR analysis as well as where native protein extraction is required
Cell lysis under aseptic conditions.
Microfluidics Ó 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Lab-on-a-chip
PCR
1567-1739/$ - see front matter Ó 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.cap.2009.06.035
e302 S.K. Jha et al. / Current Applied Physics 9 (2009) e301–e303
Fig. 3. State of MCF-10A cells flowing within microchannel: (1) before application of DC potential; (2) in-channel bubble formation at the onset and (3) next few second of
application of potential; (4) after treatment of +5 V DC for 5 min and (5) condition of microchannel after stopping the reaction, where cell debris could be seen adhered to
PDMS wall.
S.K. Jha et al. / Current Applied Physics 9 (2009) e301–e303 e303
for generation of hydroxyl ions desired for lysis and at the same
time, electrode impedance was low enough to avoid generation
of Joule heat [15] inside microchannel. The hydrogen bubbles re-
leased at the anode were indicative of this process and were re-
quired to quench the lytic hydroxyl ions at the downstream by
recombination [4]. Therefore, the intracellular components, such
as DNA, RNA etc. were supposed to be intact using this method.
This was evident from Fig. 4, where no shearing of DNA could be
observed. To further verify this fact, the cell lysate from MCF-10A
cell line was analyzed for PCR grade purity of genomic DNA by
amplifying a known tumor suppressor gene SMAD4 [16] using con-
ventional PCR method (forward primer: GTCTATGGCACATCAAAC-
TATGCACAATGC; reverse primer: GTCTAACAATTTTCCTTGCAACG).
The different temperature zones used were 92, 55 and 68 °C for
melting, annealing and extension, respectively for 30 cycles and
for 30 s each. The PCR reaction yielded desired 193 base pair prod-
uct (Fig. 5) and thereby demonstrated the successful application of
the cell lysis microchip.
4. Conclusion
Acknowledgement
References
[1] P. Guerlava, V.r. Izac, J.-L. Tholozan, Current Microbiology 36 (1998) 131.
[2] J.A. Halla, E. Felnagleb, M. Friesa, S. Spearingc, L. Monacoc, A. Steelea, Planetary
and Space Science 54 (2006) 1600.
[3] Z. Lin, Z. Cai, Biotechnology Journal 4 (2009) 210.
[4] D.D. Carlo, C. Ionescu-Zanetti, Y. Zhang, P. Hung, L.P. Lee, Lab Chip 5 (2005)
171.
[5] R.B. Brown, J. Audet, Journal of the Royal Society, Interface 5 (Suppl. 2) (2008)
S131.
[6] E. Padilla, V. Gonzalez, J.M. Manterola, J. Lonca, A. Perez, L. Matas, M.D.
Quesada, V. Ausina, Diagnosis of Microbiological Infectious Diseases 46 (2003)
19.
Fig. 5. Gel-doc showing conventional PCR for 30 cycles using cell free extract of [7] S.A. Kim, J.A. Yoon, M.J. Kang, Y.M. Choi, S.J. Chae, S.Y. Moon, Fertility and
MCF-10A lysate: lane: M: 10 kb marker, lane 1: MCF-10A pre-PCR cell free extract, Sterility (2008).
[8] D.W. Lee, Y.-H. Cho, Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical 124 (2007) 84.
lane 2: MCF-10A cell extract. PCR product yield was 800 ng/106 cells. After PCR,
[9] J. Gao, X.-F. Yin, Z.-L. Fang, Lab Chip 4 (2004) 47.
20 ll was loaded on gel compared to 6 ll of 10 kb marker.
[10] M.D. Dhawan, F. Wise, A.J. Baeumner, Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
374 (2002) 421.
and 5 V of DC input (Fig. 3) with optimum release of genomic DNA [11] C. Xing, C. Dafu, L. Changchun, C. Haoyuan, Chinese Journal of Analytical
at 5 V for 5 min (Fig. 4), which is the lowest potential range re- Chemistry 34 (2006) 1656–1660.
[12] J.-H. Kim, K.-H. Na, C.J. Kang, Y.-S. Kim, Sensors and Actuators A: Physical 120
ported in any such study. The reason for this success over similar (2005) 365.
experiments from other groups [8,9,11,14], where parallel elec- [13] H. Caldas, L.E. Honsey, R.A. Altura, Molecular Cancer 4 (2005) 11.
trodes were used along the microchannel [4] or the in-channel [14] S.-W. Lee, Y.-C. Tai, Sensors and Actuators A: Physical 73 (1999) 74.
[15] Y. Zhang, N. Bao, X.-D. Yu, J.-J. Xu, H.-Y. Chen, Journal of Chromatography A
electrodes were separated by wide gap [9], could be attributed to 1057 (2004) 247.
the Au-interdigitated electrode geometry. The alternate +5 and [16] S. Ali, C. Cohen, J.V. Little, J.H. Sequeira, M.B. Mosunjac, M.T. Siddiqui,
0 V DC across 200 lm gap between the Au electrodes was suitable Diagnostic Cytopathology 35 (2007) 644.