OSCA Group - Question
OSCA Group - Question
Group Assignment
Intake :
Hand-Out Date : Week 3
Hand-in Date Work :
Lecturer : Abubakar Santuraki
Instructions:
This is a group assignment. You will be setup into groups.
The group is to research and investigate TWO areas; Hardware and Software (Computer
Architecture and Operating System) of an information technology as it is used within a
context.
The goal of this assignment is to demonstrate knowledge and understanding in the specified
areas. The total word count of the report should be within the range of 6,000 words. You may
exceed this word count if your topic necessitates it however, the absolute limit for word count
should be +/- 1000 words.
No marks will be awarded for the entire assignment if any part is copied directly from
published materials or from another student. All submissions should be made on or before
the due date. Any late submissions after the deadline will not be entertained. Zero (0) mark
will be awarded for late submission, unless extenuating circumstances are upheld.
Etc.
S2 (Name)
S3 (Name)
S4 (Name)
S5 (Name)
S6 (Name)
Minutes of Meeting
(See Link: Click Me)
Call to order
A meeting of [Organization or team name] was held at [Location] on [Date].
Attendees
Attendees included [list attendee names].
Approval of minutes
[To replace any placeholder text (such as this) with your own, just select a line or paragraph
and type. For best results, don’t include space to the left or right of the characters in your
selection.]
Reports
[Need to add your own headings or more text? No problem. On the Home tab of the ribbon,
check out the Styles gallery to easily apply any text formatting you see in this document.]
Unfinished business
[Add your text here.]
New business
[Add your text here.]
Announcements
[Add your text here.]
Marking Criteria:
Distinction
Demonstrated comprehensive research with detailed evidence. High level of analysis
performed, exceptional and thorough knowledge and understanding displayed with regard to
facilities and services of the Operating System. Documentation presented in a professional
manner, without any spelling or grammar mistakes. Displayed evidence of critical appraisal.
Credit
Adequate research conducted with fair detail of evidence presented. Moderate level of
understanding, analysis and knowledge displayed. Good level of documentation presented.
Some level of reflection in the documentation. Moderate level of critical appraisal.
Pass
Low level research conducted. Some evidence of research displayed. Basic level of analysis,
knowledge and understanding displayed. Satisfactory level of documentation. Satisfactory or
low level of reflection displayed. Poor level of critical appraisal demonstrated.