ATL Activity 2 - Comprehension Quizzes
ATL Activity 2 - Comprehension Quizzes
Get your students to have a go at comprehension quizzes - a simple but highly effective class
activity to test their understanding of the Peacewick University case study…
2. The growth in research into which two areas has been particularly impressive at
PU?
4. Did the accident at a nearby chemical plant severely impact the surrounding
area?
7. Why did the Faculty of IT receive funding from the founder of one of the world’s
largest software companies?
8. Why would PU have faced cash flow problems during the 2021/22 academic
year?
2. The growth in research into which two areas Artificial intelligence (AI)
has been particularly impressive at PU? and medicine
4. Did the accident at a nearby chemical plant Yes, the explosion was a
severely impact the surrounding area? catastrophic accident
8. Why would PU have faced cash flow Revenue fell whilst costs
problems during the 2021/22 academic remained unchanged (PU
year? still had to pay
employees, maintain
buildings, and pay
general expenses)
This activity is about getting to know the main people in the case study, as well as other key
stakeholder groups. Read the case study and make note of everything you know about the
following people:
Adriana Cortez
Jim Summerfield
Patricia Hughes
Di Jones
Also make note of the other stakeholder groups in the case study, which include:
Board of Trustees
Students (local and overseas)
The government of Country A
Teaching faculty (lecturers)
Non-teaching staff
Computer manufacturers
Pharmaceutical companies
Local community
This review game for the Paper 1 case study has been created by Andy Hay, who is DP
Coordinator at Taejon Christian International School in South Korea.
This is best done without notes as a quick quiz/review of learning. You can create this in a similar
way as the template above. The purpose of this task to check students' understanding of certain
key areas of the syllabus. Examples include:
Challenge your students to relate their answers to the case study, e.g., which of the leadership
styles is most related to Jim Summerfield and why? Or which of the 5 listed sources of finance is
the most/least effective and why?
Many thanks to Andy for his generosity in sharing this excellent activity with us.
Students can also have a go at this SWOT analysis quiz to consolidate their understanding.
In this activity, students need to identify what is wrong with the following statements. The purpose
is two-fold:
For each statement below, determine what's wrong, i.e. why does the statement contain an
error? The error could be linked to the content of the syllabus or the context of the PU case
study.
1. Split the class into 4 groups, and assign one of the strategic options to each group: (i)
Expand overseas in Country B, (ii) Additional funding for the Faculties of Medicine,
(iii) Additional funding for the Faculties of IT, and (iv) Closure of the Faculties of
History and International Languages.
2. They have 25 minutes to prepare to present their strategic option to the rest of the
trustees (class). The teacher plays the role of Adriana Cortez.
3. Each group then has 3 minutes to present why their strategic option should be
chosen.
4. After all 4 presentations, each group is allowed to ask questions of the other groups,
which should lead to some very lively debate and discussion! Allow around 5
minutes for this.
5. To finish off, give all students 2 minutes to decide on the number 1 reason for their
own strategic option (they should write this themselves), and then the key reason
against the proposal of each of the other 3 groups.
For this activity, there is no need for the use of ICT or PowerPoint presentations etc., so
everything is verbal and the final task in hand written. This is a great activity to promote the skills
of communication, collaboration, self-management, and critical thinking!
ATL Activity 16 - Exam practice questions (by Angelica Jones & Eamonn
Traynor)
I'm very grateful to Angelica Jones from Bishop Mackenzie International School in Malawi for
developing this resource with her students. I have tweaked some of the questions (and answers)
to replicate IB assessment. Answers have been included for teachers to provide further
guidance.
Student should have a go at the following exam practice questions in preparation for their
upcoming exams.
(b). With reference to the case study, explain one advantage [4 marks]
and one disadvantage of a not-for-profit organization.
(d). Using a STEEPLE analysis framework, examine the impact [10 marks]
of the external environment on the operations of Peacewick
University.
Ask your students to create their own set of exam practice questions by using past exam papers
as a template and the official guide for the relevant parts of the syllabus that could be examined,
in the context of the Peacewick University case study.
A not-for-profit organization is one that does strive to earn profit for its owners. Instead, any
surplus earned through pursuing business activities or through donations goes right back into
running the organization.
(b). With reference to the case study, explain one advantage and one disadvantage of a
not-for-profit organization. [4 marks]
Advantages include:
● Non-profit social enterprises exist for the benefit of local communities and societies.
Peacewick University caters for the benefit of their students and aims to provide high
quality education.
● Many NPOs also qualify for government assistance in the form of grants and/or
subsidies, thereby reducing their costs of production. Peacewick University has
received funding from the government for the Faculty of Medicine.
Disadvantages include:
● They can be overly dependent on the goodwill of the general public, such as
donations or financial assistance for their funding. Peacewick University is already
struggling with cash flow problems, therefore making it harder for them to conduct
their business activities.
● The wages of workers in NPOs tends to be lower than for those who work in for-profit
organizations. Peacewick University needs to improve its pay structure for lecturers
to tackle the problems of high staff turnover and low morale.
Possibles sources of conflict could include an outline of the following, written in the context of the
case study:
Students are not required to use all the components of the STEEPLE analysis - it is a framework
only.
Political/Legal
Students should refer specifically to the case study, such as the issue in the Faculty of History,
e.g., the conflict between Patricia and Jim (Patricia claims she was wrongfully dismissed and is
taking this matter to court). Explanations could focus on:
Economic
Students could reference lines 17-18, which consider the economic recession in Country A.
Consequences of this include:
Social
The prime social issue that students might refer to is the issue concerning Di Jones and the
impact this could have on PU. For example, there could be discussions about:
● Potential risks to the corporate image of the university due to Di Jones’s family
history
● What the university should do to counter these issues (contingency planning)
● The impact on the morale of both students and staff
● The decline in the number of international students.
Technological
Students could reference the lack of resources required to meet the needs of an effectively
online lecturing programme and the difficulties associated with not learning/learning face-to-face.
Consequences of this include:
Environmental
Students could mention, reference, or acknowledge the impact of the chemical plant accident.
The environmental impacts include:
● Damage to student accommodation and ‘student lifestyle’ will harm any USP that PU
has - these are important considerations for most universities
● Social needs not being met as staff and students work remotely (online)
● Health and safety issues, such as water contamination, which will adversely impact
PU's brand development and brand image.
Ethical
Students could make reference to the pharmaceutical companies that could fund the commercial
production of PU's medicines and/or the accusation of over-pricing the products from one of
these companies to LDCs. Consequences of this includes:
● Effects on the brand image, which can reduce the number of new students and new
staff that apply to the university
● Difficulty in finding new sources of finance, especially if the corporate image of PU is
damaged by its association with unethical businesses and their questionable
practices.