ECIV 4056 Lab Experiment 2
ECIV 4056 Lab Experiment 2
Environmental Controls
LAB EXPERIMENT 2
GARRY RATHJE
OCTOBER 10, 2023
ECIV 4056: Environmental Controls 2023
A very basic but effective test method can be carried out using a tall cylinder in which a sample
of effluent is allowed to settle while measuring the slurry interface, (i.e. the region separating the
clear and concentrated regions), over time.” [1]
Problem
Using the data that was the basis of your experiment 1 report:
Design a gravity thickening tank for an inflow sludge rate of 0.015 m3/s, with a retention time of
35 minutes, calculate and report the following:
What would be the effect of your design size if the inlet flow rate was increased by 20%?
Hint: consider the following;
a. Would the underflow concentration remain the same?
b. What would happen to the retention time of your system design?
c. What other changes can be identified?
1
ECIV 4056: Environmental Controls 2023
Area requirement based on single-batch test results. For purposes of design, the final
overflow rate selected should be based on a consideration of the following factors: (1) the area
needed for clarification, (2) the area needed for thickening, and (3) the rate of sludge withdrawal.
Column settling tests, as previously described, can be used to determine the area needed for the
free-settling region directly. However, because the area required for thickening is usually greater
than the area required for settling, the rate of free settling rarely is the controlling factor. In the
case of the activated-sludge process where stray, light, fluffy floc particles may be present, it is
conceivable that the free or flocculant settling velocity of these particles could control the design.
𝑄𝑡𝑢
𝐴𝑡 = 2-1
𝐻𝑂
The critical concentration controlling the sludge-handling capability of the tank occurs at a
height H2 where the concentration is C2. This point is determined by extending the tangents to
the hindered-settling and compression regions of the subsidence curve to the point of intersection
and bisecting the angle thus formed, as shown in Figure 2-1. The time tu can be determined as
follows:
2
ECIV 4056: Environmental Controls 2023
Figure 2-1: Annotated settling curve for example problem solution [2}
1. Construct a horizontal line at the depth Hu that corresponds to the depth at which the solids
are at the desired underflow concentration Cu. The value of Hu is determined using the
following equation:
𝐶𝑂 ∙ 𝐻𝑂 2-2
𝐻𝑢 =
𝐶𝑢
With this value of tu, the area required for thickening is computed using equation 2-1. The area
required for clarification is then determined. The larger of the two areas is the controlling
value.” [1]
3
ECIV 4056: Environmental Controls 2023
H0 = 0.4 m tu = 34 min
H1 = 0.27 m t1 = 8.6 min
H2 = 0.15 m t2 = 22.9 min
𝐴𝑡 = 23.6𝑚2
(𝐻0 − 𝐻1 )𝑚 𝑚
𝑣= = 0.91
(𝑡1 − 0)𝑚𝑖𝑛 ℎ 2-3
b. Determine the clarification (overflow) rate. Because the overflow rate is proportional to
the liquid volume above the critical sludge zone, it may be computed as follows:
𝑚3 (0.4𝑚 − 0.067𝑚) 𝑚3
𝑄𝑐 = 𝑄 ∙ = 333.0 2-4
𝑑 0.4𝑚 𝑑
c. Determine the area required for clarification. The required area is obtained by dividing
the overflow rate by the settling velocity.
4
ECIV 4056: Environmental Controls 2023
𝑄𝑐
𝐴𝑐 = = 15.2𝑚2 2-5
𝑣
The controlling requirement is the larger value of either the thickening area or clarification area.
𝑘𝑔 𝑘𝑔
𝑆𝑜𝑙𝑖𝑑𝑠, = 𝑄 ∙ 𝐶0 = 1600 2-6
𝑑 𝑑
𝑘𝑔
𝑆𝑜𝑙𝑖𝑑𝑠
𝑆𝑜𝑙𝑖𝑑𝑠 𝐿𝑜𝑎𝑑𝑖𝑛𝑔 = 𝑑 = 67.8 𝑘𝑔 2-7
𝐴𝑡 𝑚2 𝑚2 ∙ 𝑑
𝑚3
𝑄𝑐 𝑚3
𝐻𝑦𝑑𝑟𝑎𝑢𝑙𝑖𝑐 𝐿𝑜𝑎𝑑𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑅𝑎𝑡𝑒 = 𝑑 = 14.1 2-8
𝐴(𝑡 𝑜𝑟 𝑐) 𝑚2 𝑚2 ∙ 𝑑
References:
1. Wastewater Engineering Treatment/Disposal/Reuse, Metcalf and Eddy, Boston, 2nd
edition, McGraw-Hill, 1979, pg. 210-214
2. Talmadge, W.P., and E. B. Finch: Determining Thickener Unit Areas, Ind Eng. Chem.,
Vol. 47, no. 1, 1955