Design Calculation For RC Ring Beam
Design Calculation For RC Ring Beam
1 Introduction 3
2 Design Criteria 3
2.1 Materials 3
2.2 Loads 3
2.3 Soil Conditions 3
2.4 Other Parameters 3
2.5 Codes and References 3
3 Analysis Considerations 4
3.1 Numerical Models 4
4 Load Calculations 6
4.1 Vertical Load 6
4.2 Lateral Loads 7
4.3 Loading Diagram 8
6 Details 14
2 Design Criteria
2.1 Materials
2.1.1 Concrete
2.2 Loads
Superimposed loads are based on Loading Data prepared by Ishii Iron Works (Attachment 1).
3 Analysis Considerations
Attachment 3 presents the finite element model and the diagrams of loadings applied in the model.
The ring beam is simulated into a series of 3d model finite elements. Estimated required soil bearing
pressure and varying settlement (considering a maximum differential settlement of 65 mm ) were
represented as vertical springs acting at the bottom of the elements. The vertical load due to weight of
tank will be considered acting eccentric, beyond the centreline of the ring beam. To represent this
condition a fictitious member projecting outwards the ring, at the top joint of the topmost elements were
provided. Similarly, the vertical load due to weight of water also acts eccentrically at the inner side of the
ring beam centreline. This is represented by fictitious member projectecting inwards the ring, at the top
joints of the topmost elements. Calculation of lengths of the fictitious members were presented in this
calculation
For determining total required bottom reinforcements, a stick Model (Attachment 5) was simulated
considering the same loading conditions as the finite element model, in addition to suppport load
displacements applied to the semi-circle portions of the ring beam.
The model is analysed to check the worst case between the maximum and minimum possible values of
subgrade reaction of the backfill (Attachment 2).
3.1.3 Loading
Vertical loads from the tank shell were imposed on the ring beam were derived based on loading data
(furnished by Ishii Iron Works).
Load of liquid, in contact with the ring beam was also included. Height of liquid according to the loading
data is 20.20 m, based on 1013 atm bar normal atmospheric pressure.
Lateral loads acting from soil, against the ring beam are as follows:
Soil pressure due to saturated bulk density
Hydrostatic pressure
Surcharge due to weight of tank bottom plate and weight of contained water.
Support displacement load has been considered in the stick model by applying varying values
spread over half the circumference of the ring beam. The maximum support displacement load
considered is 65 mm, based on maximum differential settelement required by B & V(Attachment 2).
The tank bottom plate is expected to resist bending from the shell and from the intermediate columns.
Since there is no rigid connection from the tank to the ring beam, no moment transfer due to normal
loads, earthquake and wind forces are considered in the analysis of the ring beam. However, horizontal
load due to seismic condition, based in Ishii Iron Works Loading data, were applied in the analysis of
model, considering frictional force between the bottom of the tank filled with water, and top of ring beam.
WTS = 5717 kN (From Ishii Iron Works. Refer to Sht 3 & 4 of Attachment 1)
D = 44 -m
WTS/m = 5717/(X D)
= 41.36 kN/m
FyTS = 41.36 X 1
= 41.36Kn
Considering thickness of ring beam as 0.8 metre, and the 44 tank is offset by 50
mm beyond the cetnreline of the ring beam, the contact area, Ac, of water is calculated
as:
Ac = ( / 4) x {442 – [44-2x(0.8/2+0.05)]2}
= ( / 4) x (442 – 43.12)
= 61.57 m2
The diameter Dw which is the location of centreline of water in contact with ring is
calculated as:
Dw = 44-2x[(0.8/2+0.05)/2]
= 43.55 m
efh2o =½ (offset of shell from centreline of ring beam + ½ width of the ring beam)
Psur
Pactive
Hydrostatic Pressure
PHYDRO = w H
= 10 x 1.1
= 11 kN/m2
PHYDRO
Based on Ishii Loading data, the F H for the shell was calculated considering total
weight of shell, including weight of contained liquid. Considering weights in contact
with ring beam acting against the given earthquake force, total resistance is
computed as the product of the weight of tank shell loaded with liquid and coefficient
FyTS FyH20
FHEQ
FHWIND
1.1 m
Settlement,
Joint
(m)
1 -0.06500
2 - 3 -0.06312
4 - 150 -0.06123
5 - 149 -0.05935
6 - 148 -0.05746
7 - 147 -0.05558
8 - 146 -0.05370
9 - 145 -0.05181
10 - 144 -0.04993
11 - 143 -0.04804
12 - 142 -0.04616
13 - 141 -0.04428
14 - 140 -0.04239
15 - 139 -0.04051
16 - 138 -0.03862
17 - 137 -0.03674
18 - 136 -0.03486
19 - 135 -0.03297
20 - 134 -0.03109
21 - 133 -0.02920
22 - 132 -0.02732
23 - 131 -0.02543
24 - 130 -0.02355
25 - 129 -0.02167
26 - 128 -0.01978
27 - 127 -0.01790
28 - 126 -0.01601
29 - 125 -0.01413
30 - 124 -0.01225
31 - 123 -0.01036
32 - 122 -0.00848
33 - 121 -0.00659
34 - 120 -0.00471
35 - 119 -0.00283
36 - 118 -0.00094
See Attachment 4 for finite element analysis results and Attachment 5 for stick model Analysis
results for verifying bottom reinforcements on ring beam.
5.5 Design
Ring Tensile stress from STAAD, Fts = 3829.23 kN/m-height/m-thk (due to Ult. Loads)
Ring Tensile force Ft = 3829.23 X 1.1m-height X 0.8-m thk
= 3369.72 kN
Distribute reinforcement at beam edges (dist. factors = say 1.70 for sides, 0.30 for top &
bottom):
At each side, Asides = (7691.76/4) x 1.70 = 3269 mm2
Top (and bottom) reinf. At&b = (7691.76/4) x 0.30 = 576.88 mm2
Consider clear cover = 75 mm; effective depth, d = 1100 – 75 – 12mm ties – T32 /2 = 997 mm
Since 0.5vc < v < (vc + 0.4), provide minimum links. Try link spacing = 150