The Elements of Integration-Bartle R.
The Elements of Integration-Bartle R.
oF}52. The Elements of Iteration
sothat 4, 6X, dy © Ayy2sand X= dy According to Lemma4.s,
an Jord < J toe fran.
Since the sequence (4,) is monotone increasing and has union X, it
follows from Lemmas 4.3(6) and 3.4(a) that
Jods =tim [ode
‘Therefore, on taking the limit in (4.7) with respect to, we obtain
fora 0, then of belongs
toM™ and
Jefde=e frau.
(©) I hoe belong 10M, then f+ belongs to M* and
Jus erde= frde+ fede
The Iiegral 33
Proor. (a) Ife =O the result is immediate. If ¢ > 0, let (%) be
‘a monotone increasing sequence of simple functions in M* converging
to fon X (see Lemma 2.11). Then (cp) is a monotone sequence
converging to ¢f. If we apply Lemma 4.3(a) and the Monotone
Convergence Theorem, we obtain
Jere = tim fe ce
= elim fonda = © f £4
() If () and (J) ate monotone increasing sequences of simple
functions converging to f and g, respectively, then (py + ox) i8
‘monotone ineteasing sequence converging to f + g. It follows from
[Lemma 4,3{2) and the Monotone Convergence Theorem that
for oe = tim fio, + 494
=n fonda + en fn ce
~ fra firds. ano.
‘The next result, A consequence of the Monotone Convergence
‘Theorem, is very important for it enables us to handle sequences of
functions that are not monotone.
48 Farou’s Leva. 1/(f) belongs 10 M*(X, X), then
4s) Joi int) de < tim int f fae
PROOF. Let fq inf an Sness:-} 89 that Bq < fq Whenever
mn. Therefore
Jute f[nm men
so that
Jed < timiat ff de
‘Since the sequence (g) is increasing and converges to lim inf f,, the34 The Elements of Integration
Monotone Convergence Theorem implies that
Joie ing A) du = tim fen de
<< timintf fd ae,
1 willbe seen in an exercise that Fatou's Lemma may fail ift is not
assumed that f, > 0.
49 conse fe Ma ead oy
as 0 = [7a
then 4 is a measure.
PROOF. Since f > 0 it follows that NE) > 0. If E= 0, then fe
vanishes everywhere so that 4(0) = 0. To see that A is countably
additive, let (Ey) be a disjoint seqyence of sets in X with union E and
let f, be defined to be
Son Shin
Ie follows from Corollary 47(0) and induction that
Jt 3 [srate= $69
Since (f,) is an increasing sequence in M* converging to je, the
‘Monotone Convergence Theorem implies that
MB) = | Free = tim J fade
4.10 Conoutany. Suppose that f belongs to M*. Then f(x) = 0
soalmost everywhere on X if and only if
Soe, ose
(410) rae
ROOF. If equation (4.10) olds, let
B= {rex ste) >
The Integral 35.
s0 that f > (1/m) xe, from which
0m frau > 1aed > 0
It follows that w(E,)
ence the set
wer s9>o-0 &
sho ta mea,
Convene) = 0 palo eye
E=(xeX:f)> 0),
then u(E) = 0. Let fy = mxx- Since f < lim inf fy, it follows from
Fatou's Lemma that
1
0< fran 0 for
fe Ly and that
NUch) = flofl de = tol [flare = lela
oreover it follows from the Triangle Inequality that
nugtay= fire site s fr + ledae
= funda field = MU + Nae
Hence Ny isa semisnorm on L, and it follows from Corollary 410 that
V.{f) = 0 if and only if f(x) = O for almost all x. GED.
tn order to make L(Y, X,1) into a normed linear space, we shall
identify two functions that are equal almost everywhere; that i, We Use
equivalence classes of functions instead of funetions.
6.6 Denies. Two fonctions in L = LOX, X,p) are sid to be
suite if they are equal pnalmost everywhere. The equivalence
‘lass determined by in Lis sometimes denoted by {1 and consists of
tho set ofall finetions in L-which are wequivalent tf. The Lebesgue
space Ly = LQ, X,p) consists ofall yequivalence eases in La If
[7 belongs to L;, we define its norm by
on unis = fuse
6.7 Tasonss.
space
‘The Lebesgue space L(X,X,#) (8 a normed linear
us wl
|
|
EFT Shrrcreve Bhaces 2, |
ROOF. It s understood, of course, that the vector operations in
are defined by
(N= (fl, U4 t= +a).
‘and that the zero element of Ly is (0). We shall check only 1
equation (6.1) gives a norm on Ly. Certainly [fl]: > O and j(0}.
0. Moreover, if [L/Ils = 0 then
Jina =o,
$0 f(x) = 0 for pealmost all x. Hence [f]= [0]. Fnsly itis ew
seen that properties (i) and Gv) of Definition 6. are satisfied. Th
fore | |. yields a norm on Ly, a
TE should alvays be remembered thatthe elements of Ly are act
cquivalence classes of functions in L. However, itis both conven
land customary to regard these elements as being functions, and
Shall subsequently do so. Thus we shall make reference to
equivalence clas (/ by referring to “the element fof Ly,” and we
vite [fin place of ILI}
THE SPACES L,,1. 1 and
(1p) (ig) = 1. Then fee, and | fats < Iflelte:
moor. Let « be a real number satisfying O < « < 1, and consider
the funetion g defined for ¢ > 0 by
jaar
wis easy to check that g(f) < OforO <1 < Land p(f) > Ofore > 1
It follows from the Mean Value Theorem of ealculus that ¢(?) > 9(1)
and that 9(2) = g(I), if and only if = 1. Therefore we have
Heat -o), 120.
1 a, 8 are nonnegative, and if we let = ab and multiply by 6, we
‘obtain the inequality
eb gaat (lab,
‘where equality holds if and only ifa = 5.
[Now let p and q satisfy 1 < p< eo and (Ip) + (I/g) = 1 and take
«= Lip. It follows that if 4, B are any nonnegative real numbers,
then
ae
oo aacek
and thatthe equality holds if and only if 4” = BY
Suppose that feL, and ge, and that [fly # 0 and gle # 0,
ee eT
le and (64) with 4 = |/(a)Iflp and
‘The product fis. measur
B= |e(0|Male implies that
deed ¢ Alt , Leonie
ifs Lele alse * igh”
Since both of the terms on the right are integrable, it follows from
Corollary 5.4 and Theorem 'S.S that fe is integrable, Moreover, on
integrating we obtain
Viel 141
Visteh $2 * 4
which is Hélder’s Inequality
oxo,
Holder's Inequality implies thatthe produet of a funetion in Land
8 function in Z, is integrable when p > | and q satisfies the relation
(Up) + (Wa) = 1 oF, equivalently, when p+ q = pq. Two numbers
satisfying this elation are said to be conjugate indices. It will be noted
that p = 2 is the only seconjagate index. Thus the product of two
functions in Lis integrable
6.10 Caucay-Bunvaxovskit-Scuvwaaz INEQUALITY.
belong t0 La, then fie integrable and
63) | fsa] < fide < ite tale
6.11 Mixkowski's INsquatity,
then f +h belongs to L, and
66) Ut Ab < le + Mile:
PROOF. ‘The case p = I has already been treated, so we suppose
p> 1. The sum+ hisevidently measurable, Since
If + AF < Rup (JAN < 24/1 + JAP)
it follows from Corollary $4 and Theorem 5.5 that f+ he Ly
GON AP = WF ALLE APE LST He Le P
Since f+ heL,, then [f+ hl? eL,; since p = (p — 1g it follows that
WS and g
US and b belong t0 Ly, p>
More-58 The Elements of Integration
[f+ He-MeL,. Hence we can apply Holder's Inequality to infer that
firiure mesa < Lnle{ fir areoe an)
~ le Is + Al,
1 ns treat the second term on the righ in (6.7) similarly, we obtain
USF Hh? ULF + ALP + DLS L+H
(Ufly + Va) A+ AL
VA = [f+ hy =0, then equation (6.6) is vial. If A #0, we
can divide the above inequality by 4°*; since p — plg = 1, we obtain
Minkowski’s Inequality. geo.
tis readily seen thatthe space L, isa Linear space and that formula
(63) defines a norm on L,.. The only nontrivial thing to be checked
here isthe inequality 6.1@9) and this is Minkowski's Inequality. We
shall now show that L, is complete under this norm in the following
6.12 DeFINrrioN, A sequence (Jf) in Ly is a Cauchy sequence in
1, if for every positive number « there exists an. M(e) such that if
min > M(), then [fy —fallp N(@), then [/—fely <¢. A normed linear space is
complete if every Cauchy sequence converges to some element of the
space.
6.13 Lenin. Uf the sequence (f.) converges 10 fin Ly, then itis @
Cauchy sequence.
proor. Ifm,n > M(¢/2), then
U-filb . [Alternatively let X= R, X= B, and
Jet be Lebesgue measure and define g(x) = O for x < 1 and g(x) =
Us tors > 1
6H, Let X=, and let \ be the measure on NV which has measure
La atthe point a. (More precisely NE) = 3 {V/n®: ne E}.) Show
That UX) < ten, Let f be defined on ¥ by f(a) = Vi. Show that
fet, and only 1 0. Show that
there ents tt eX with s(E) < 40 such that if FeX and
FOE, = Ou then Ufvsly <
6 Let fre LyX, X.0), 1 O, then there exists a set E,e-X with u(E,) < too such that if
FeXand FOE, = 0, then B,(F) < «forall meV.