Management
Management
1.1 INTRODUCTION
In order to appreciate various labour legislation it is necessary to know the
philosophy of Labour Laws.
Over the years labour laws have undergone a change with regard to the object and
scope. Early labour legislation were enacted to safeguard the interest of employers. It
was governed by the doctrine of laissez faire. Modern labour legislation on the other
hand aims at protecting workers against exploitation by employers. The advent of
doctrine of welfare state is based on the notion of progressive social philosophy
which has rendered the old doctrine of laissez faire obsolete. The theory of "hire and
fire" as well as the theory of "supply and demand" which found free scope under the
old doctrine of laissez faire no longer holds good.
There has been a remarkable change in the approach to Labour law and industrial 5
Introduction to Labour Legislation
relations since the World War IL Philadelphia Charter adopted in 1944 provided that
"Labour is not a commodity" and that "poverty anywhere is a danger to prosperity
everywhere". W. Friedmann and others who have tried to analyse the essential
characteristics of the legal development in this branch of law consider 'social-duty'-
on-the part of employer as the main bed rock on which this law is built. This is
exemplified by the very approach of law makers to the construction of a wage packet
of the working man in the post-second World War period, wage fixation and
legislation relating to condition of work. The Indian Constitution lays down broad
guidelines to be followed by State.
The Supreme Court in D.N. Banerji v. P.R. Mukherjee, AIR 1953 SC 58 stated that
the law as developed after the second World War, particularly in a welfare State has
reversed the theories of Sir Henry Maine and now society progresses form contract to
status and the post war world has seen considerable legislation laying down
conditions of service and also ensuring by laws payment of minimum wages.
2.1 Introduction
2.5 Conclusion
2.1 INTRODUCTION
The basis of changing the practice of industrial relations management from a reactive
to a strategic mode could revolve around the following concepts and propositions
1. The concept of alienation is the key to the analysis of condition of wage labour
given the reality of contradiction-ridden organisational and societal totalities.
(Hymen, R: Industrial Relations, a Marxist Introduction, London, Macmillan,
1977: pp 4-7).
2. The concept of alienation is also the key to a better understanding of the
interface between human resources development and industrial relations.
3. Any consideration of change from reactivity to strategic proactivity, in the
process of considering the effect of the concept of human resources development
on industrial relations should, therefore, be founded on the evolution of
strategies oriented to the disalienation of direct producers.
The scheme is self-explanatory and demonstrates clearly the shift in focus which has
taken place along with the change from the term "Personnel Function" to the term
"HRD Function". While the term personnel function has somehow or the other been
associated with perspective, critical-evaluative, punitive connotations, the term HRD
function vibrates with images of a positive, dynamic development-oriented approach.
The central theme in the HRD approach is the development of, the individual. The
emphasis has shifted from "maximisation of performance" and "compensation",
towards "employee potential awareness creation" and employee potential realisation",
The focus is now on enhancing employee involvement in interrialising organisational
objectives ,through vibrant HRD efforts in order to release the springs of dynamism
and creativity of 15
Introduction to Labour Legislation
individuals. The HRD approach holds the view point that the personnel function has
reduced human resources in organisation to mere objects while the HRD approach
views the people in organisations as the subjects of the organisation's history and
destiny. The employees are no longer cogs in the organisational wheel but the active
agents shaping not only their own futures but also the future of the organisation. The
HRD approach therefore, postulates a proactive rather than a reactive approach, as
visionary stance rather than a firefighting orientation, a developmental strategy rather
than a constructive strategy.
The discussion of the conceptual basis for considering the modalities of shifting from
a reactive mode to a proactive mode, however, has tried to demonstrate that the
contradiction-ridden totality of society forms the framework for the alienated
condition of the working classes. Workers experience powerlessness, self-
estrangement, cultural estrangement, meaninglessness, and normlessness given the
politico-economic profile of the prevalent mode of production as well as the relations
of production.
Anyone familiar with life in organisations knows that the HRD approach appears to
pull in one direction while the reality of industrial relations appear to pull in an
opposite direction. Rules, regulations, enforcement, grievances, discipline,
transgressions, enquiries, sanctions, unions, more unions, disputes, negotiations,
litigation appeals, banners, slogans, go-slows, gheraos, strikes,.lockouts, mandays
loss, wages loss, production loss, damage, violence, intimidation terror, despondency,
despair, death - such are the stuff industrial relations realities are made of :
The HRD approach makes many assumptions which further appears to increase the
distance between the HRD orientation from the realities of industrial relations:
1. The employee is an individual employee, isolated, insulated, from other
organisational and extra-organisation forces.
2. The individual employee is amenable to 'developmental' overtures.
3. The organisation can establish a direct relationship and rapport with the
individual employee who is generally satisfied with the organisation.
4. The organisation is the sole custodian of the individual's growth and
development.
5. The organisation is capable of magnanimity and impartiality in transcending
social, cultural, economic inequalities, so much a reality in the Indian
organisational context in its dealings with employees..
6. The organisational - individual relationship is homogeneous, harmonious, stable,
cohesive, vibrant.
It must be recalled here that the conceptual basis evolved earlier, yielded the picture
of an alienated labour given a contradiction-ridden totality:- A perusal of the history
of industrial relations in India, an analysis of the legal foundations of industrial
relations and an appraisal of the empirical realities of industrial relations yields a
certain profile of industrial relations, which calls into question many of the
assumptions made by the HRD approach.
The industrial relations system has given employers the following rights:
1. The right to hire employees
2. The right to frame the terms of contract with employees
3. The right to enforce discipline at the work place
4. The right to form trade unions
5. The right to layoff, to retrench and to dismiss workers
6. The right to lockout employees as well as to close down operations
Employees have been given the following rights:
• The right to form and register a trade union
16 • The right to activate the machinery to resolve dispute
• The right to strike to redress grievances
Labour – Laws – Concepts,
Origin, Objectives and
UNIT 3 LABOUR LAWS - CONCEPT, Classification
Labour Legislations contain the principles of social justice, social equity, social
security and national economy in their concept.
Social justice implies two things. First, equitable distribution of profits and other
benefits of industry between owner and workers. Second, providing protection to
workers against harmful effect to their health, safety and morality.
Social equality provides the flexibility in labour legislations to adjust to the' need of
the industrial society.
Social security envisages collective action against social risks which constitute the
crux of the labour legislation.
National Economy provides the standards to be set for the labour legislations.
Human Rights principles and human dignity postulates provide the broader base for
the concept of labour legislations.
Thus, these principles are the fundamentals for understanding the concept of Labour
jurisprudence.
During the Second World War, in April 1944, a conference was convened at
Philadelphia. As a result of these deliberations, the aims of the ILO were redefined.
This was termed the Declaration of Philadelphia which was later incorporated into
ILO's constitution. This conference reaffirmed the principles of ILO, namely, that
(a) Labour is not a commodity,
(b) freedom of expression and of association are essential to sustained progress,
(c) poverty anywhere constitutes a danger to prosperity everywhere,
(d) The war against want requires to be carried on with unrelenting vigour within
each nation, and by continuous and concerted international effort in which the
representatives of workers and employers enjoying equal status with those of
governments, join with them in free discussion and democratic decision with a
view to the promotion of the common welfare.
The Declaration of Philadelphia set forth 10 objectives which the ILO was to further
and promote among the nations of the world. The theme underlying these objectives
is social justice. The objectives are as follows:
(a) Full employment and the raising of standards of living,
(b) the employment of workers in the occupation in which they can have the
satisfaction of giving the fullest measure of their skill, and make their
contribution to the common well being,
(c) the provision, as a means to the attainment of this end, and under adequate
guarantees for all concerned, of facilities for training and the transfer of labour
including migration for employment and settlement,
(d) policies in regard to wages and earning, bonus and other conditions of work
calculated to ensure a just share of the fruits of progress to all, and a minimum
living wage to all employed and in need of protection,
(e) the effective recognition of the right of collective bargaining, the cooperation of
management and labour in the continuous improvement of productive' efficiency
and the collaboration of workers and employers in social and economic
measures,
(f) the extension of social security measures to provide a basic income to all in need
of such protection and comprehensive medical care,
(g) adequate protection for the life and health of workers in all occupations,
(h) provision for child welfare and maternity protection,
(i) the provision of adequate nutrition, housing and facilities for creation and
culture,
(j) the assurance of equality of educational and vocational opportunity.
4.1.3 The Structure of the ILO
This is the third major body in the ILO system. It functions as the Secretariat of the
ILO in Geneva. The Director General of the ILO is the Chief Executive of this office.
The Director General is appointed by the Governing Body and he also acts as the
Secretary General of the Conference. The staff bf this office is appointed by the
Director General. He is assisted by two deputy director generals, six assistant director
generals, one director of the International Institute for Labour Studies, one director of
the International Centre of Advanced Technical and Vocational Training, advisors,
chiefs of divisions, and other staff drawn from 100 nations.
The constitution of ILO describes the main functions of this office. They are:
1. To prepare documents on the items of the agenda of the Conference.
2. To assist governments in framing legislation on the basis of the decisions of the ILC.
3. To carry out its function in connection with the observance of the conventions.
4. To bring out publications dealing with industrial labour problems of international
interest.
5. To collect and distribute information of international labour and social problems.
4.1.4 The Finance of the ILO
The ILC fixes the budget on the recommendations of the Governing Body and
member states make contributions accordingly. Contributions are fixed on an ad hoc
basis from year to year.
The need for standard setting activities, in overall ILO plans and programme, is the
most important one. In the In-depth Review of International Labour Standards, (Feb,
32 1976), it element in the development of
Introduction to Labour Legislation
After India became independent, it adopted a Constitution on the 26 Apr 1949. Indian
Constitution is a unique basic national document. Besides providing basic principles
for governance, it presents the aspirations of the Weaker Section of Society, specially
the working classes. It is also a strange phenomenon of history that national freedom-
struggle and struggle of working class emancipation coincided and our leaders fought
for both- the betterment of worker's lots and India's freedom. During this period, they
made some promises and pledges to the working classes, which were to be redeemed
after independence. The redemption of all those promises and pledges get expression
in our Constitution.
Constitution is the supreme law of a nation and all legislations draw their inspiration
from it. Constitution is a document of social revolution casting an obligation on every
instrumentality including the judiciary to transform the status quo ante into a new
human order in which justice, social, economic and political will inform all
institutions of national life and there should be equality of status and opportunity to
all. The trinity of Indian Constitution, the Preamble, the Fundamental Rights and the
Directive Principles of State Policy, embody the fundamental principles, which
provide guide to all legislations, including the labour legislations. This constitutional
trinity assures its citizens to provide "Socialistic Pattern of Society" and create
"Welfare State" and all legislations, specially the Labour legislations, are deeply
influenced by them.
Constitution of India is the supreme law of the land and fountain head of all labour
policies. The trinity of Constitution- the Preamble, the Fundamental Rights and the
Directive Principles of State Policies, provide the base and inspiration for enunciation
of labour policies by the Government. The Preamble provide the philosophies and
principles, the Fundamental Rights postulate the human rights and human dignity and
Directive Principles the progressive and on-going ways for Labour Policy
formulation.
Keeping the diversities and pluralistic structure of Labour problems, our Constitution
keeps labour in the concurrent list i.e. both Central Government and the State
Government have powers to legislate and regulate labour problems.
The ILO and its Instruments
Right from its very inception in 1919, the ILO through its Conventions and
Recommendations, has been defining and redefining the international labour
standards and impressing on the member states the need to ratify them,
Out of over 180 Conventions, India has adopted 36.
Some of the subjects covered by international labour code are the following
a) Freedom of association
b) Prohibition of forced labour
c) Equality of opportunity and treatment
d) Employment and human resources
e) Social Policy/Labour Administration
f) Industrial relations
g) Weekly rest and paid leave
h) Occupational safety and health
i) Social security
j) Employment of women
43
Introduction to Labour Legislation
k) Employment of children and young persons
l) Migrant workers
m) Hours of work
All these have influence on formulation of Labour Policy in India
Five Year Plans and Labour policy
Labour investigation Committee, 1946 and Royal Commission on Labour 1931 and
their recommendations guided the labour policy in immediate post-independent
period.
1. Revise the existing labour legislations to meet the changing needs of the time
2. Abolish/regulate Contract Labour
3. Evolve fair, terms and deal for all workers
4. Fix wages for sweated industries
5. Health Insurance Programme
6. Network of Employment Exchanges
National Commission on Labour and the Successive Five Year Plans have
contributed some thing or the other for the formulation of labour policies at national
level.
Tripartite Labour Bodies and Labour Policy
Indian Labour Conference and Standing Labour Committee were formed (1942) with
a view to provide necessary platform for evolving national labour policy on
consensus basis. They have done valuable service over the years. But because of the
adamant attitude of Government not to accept even the unanimous recommendations,
these bodies have not been successful in their mission fully.
6.1.2 The Main Postulates of Labour Policy
The main elements of our labour policy have been as follows:
1. Emergence of state as the most prominent player as the custodian of the interests
of the working community, as also the catalyst of change and welfare
programmes
2. Recognition of right of direct action, if justice is denied to the working class
3. Encouragement of mutual settlement, collective bargaining and voluntary
arbitration
4. Intervention by the state in favour of the weaker party to ensure fair treatment
and all concerned
5. Primacy to maintenance of industrial peace
6. Involving partnership between the employer and the employee in a constructive
endeavour to promote the satisfaction of economic needs of the community in
the best possible manner
7. Ensuring fair standards and provisions of social security
8. Cooperation for augmenting "production" and increasing "Productivity"
9. Adequate enforcement of Legislations
10. Enhancing the interests of workers in industry
11. Tripartite consultations
Our colonial masters devised Labour Policy keeping two broad economic factors in
44 view : (1) to protect the interests of British Enterprises in India (ii) to ensure
uninterrupted supply
Labour Policy, Emerging
of goods and services to enable them to manage wars, which they encountered in the Issues and Future Trends
first half of the 20th Century. They were aware that they have to leave India one day
and therefore, they wanted to drain out wealth from India to England and for that
they wanted to contain labour by adhoc, negative and reactive measures. No
systematic and planned effort was made to evolve a development oriented labour
policy, ensuring the growth of a healthy IR system.
During Colonial period policy of government for IR was one of laissez-faire and
selective interventions at most (NLC 1969). There were hardly any law to protect the
interests of workers except the employers and workmen (Disputes) Act which was
used mostly to settle wage disputes. The Britishers were compelled to enact Indian
Trade Union Act 1926, Trade Disputes Act 1929, Bombay Industrial Relations
Act,1938; recommendations of Royal Commission on Labour 1931 led to the
Payment of Wages Act 1936 and amendments to Factory Legislations. But during
World War II, their concern for IR became quite evident when they used Defence of
India Rule 81A for Compulsory Arbitration and established Tripartite Forums (ILC
and SLC:) to deal with IR problems.
6.2.2 Post Independence Period 1947-2000
Even after independence, the Labour Policy continued to be influenced by colonial
mind set and our legislature could not muster courage to make fundamental departure
Psychological hang-over of the past continued to be reflected in our Labour Policy in
independent India.
During the freedom struggle, our leaders made promises and pledges to the working
classes. Our leaders displayed varied ideological commitment - the communist
ideology, the fabian socialist ideology and the liberal democratic idealogies have
deep influence on our Labour Policy.
We have three main sources of legislations which form the core of labour policies.
They are central legislations (67) the state legislations (157) and the judge made
laws.
The Indian Labour Conference and Standing Labour Committee provided the forums
for discussion among the different stakeholders to evolve Labour Policy based on
consensus.
(i) Despite all these, Labour Policy in India remained consistently inconsistent. Shri
V.V. Giri wanted to bring the policy of one union in one industry and
strengthening the institution of collective- bargaining, failing which going for
Compulsory Arbitration. But that could not materialise.
(ii) In 1957-58, emphasis shifted from legalistic approach to voluntarism. Several
voluntary arrangements gained currency - Code of Discipline (1958), Model
Grievance Procedure (1958), Code of Conduct(1958), Verification of Trade
Union Membership (1958), Voluntary Arbitration (1959), Code of Efficiency
and Welfare (1959), Industrial Truce Revolution (1962).
(iii) India had to face three wars between 1962-1972 and therefore wanted better
discipline in all spheres of life, including labour management. From 1968 till
early years of eightees, the labour market was marked by violence, gheraoes and
militancy. Emergency in June 75, established National Apex Body in place of
ILC. After emergency, Janta Govt. rehabilitated ILC, and workers participation
in management gained currency. Labour militancy also revived. Government
went for ESMA (Essential Services Maintenance Act) for meeting the situation
of industrial strife. During this period unsuccessful attempts were made to
reform labour legislations and to adopt a policy of workers participation
As a result of these adhoc and fragmented approach in Labour Policy, we have got a
totally protected and sheltered labour management relations.
- Thus, our labour policy has not come up to our expectations and it lacks direction and
sense of proportion. Labour being an important component of production, the poor
labour policy gets reflected in our productivity and other economic parameters.
- When India became independent, it was one of the major economic powers. But in
1990, it is at the bottom of other industrialising countries. It got itself marginalised.
India's share in the world exports declined from 1.4% in 1953 to 0.5% in 1990, its
share in import also declined from 1.3% to 0.7% during the corresponding period. 45