0% found this document useful (0 votes)
235 views

Analysis Report

This report summarizes the structural analysis and design of a proposed 5-story residential building in Damak, Nepal. The building is designed as an RCC framed structure using M25 grade concrete and Fe500 reinforcement. Structural modeling and analysis was performed using ETABS software to analyze member forces and deformations under gravity and seismic loads based on Nepali design codes. Preliminary member sizing was performed considering strength, serviceability, and code requirements. The report outlines the building features, design methodology, analysis results, and recommendations for construction.

Uploaded by

Roman Baral
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
235 views

Analysis Report

This report summarizes the structural analysis and design of a proposed 5-story residential building in Damak, Nepal. The building is designed as an RCC framed structure using M25 grade concrete and Fe500 reinforcement. Structural modeling and analysis was performed using ETABS software to analyze member forces and deformations under gravity and seismic loads based on Nepali design codes. Preliminary member sizing was performed considering strength, serviceability, and code requirements. The report outlines the building features, design methodology, analysis results, and recommendations for construction.

Uploaded by

Roman Baral
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 40

A

STRUCTURAL DESIGN
REPORT
OF
THE PROPOSED BUILDING OF RESIDENTAL

OWNER:
Mrs. Sajima Banu SUBMITTED
TO:
Damak Municipality , Jhapa
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN

This report comprises the summary of the Residential building of Mrs. Sajima Banu Damak-07
Jhapa , Nepal. The reports consist of the design procedures adopted, the assumptions made, the
inputs made in the design and the design output. During the design, it is assumed that the client
will completely follow the architectural as well as the structural design. It is also assumed that
the construction will be supervised by professional engineer.

The designer will not be responsible if any alterations to the structural system is made by the
client or the contractor without the prior written permission from the designer, or the
alterations to non-structural system is made such that the weight of each individual floor or the
weight of the whole building is altered by more than 10% of design weight of each floor and
the total weight.

The design calculations and derivations are limited to only a minimum to let the concerned
people know the methodology adopted. However, the calculations may be provided to the
client or concerned authorities when needed, upon request.

Designer

…………………………………

Er. Rabin Bhattarai

NEC No. 4944 “A” Civil

(Earthquake Engineer )
TABLE OF CONTENTS

S.N. Title Page No. 1 Introduction 1 2 Salient features 1 3 Design


Approach and Methodology Error! Bookmark not defined.
4 Preliminary Design 8
5 Final Analysis 9

6 Design Methodology 14
7 Analysis Output 15

8 Design of Members 16
1.0 Background
This report summarizes structural analysis and design of the Residential building for Damak
Municipality . The analysis and design has been based on the prevailing codes that are in practice in
Nepal, the National Building Code of Nepal and the IS codes at places.

2.0 Salient Features


2.1 Project Information:
Owner : Mrs. Sajima Banu
Building Type : Residential Building
Location : Damak -07
Plot no. : 37660 & 37669
Land Area : 0-0-9
Plinth Area : 811.69 Sq.ft

2.2 Building Features:


Type of Structure: RCC Framed Structure
Storey: 5 Storey
Storey Height: 3.175 m

Page 3 of 32
Total Height: 15.875 m

2.3 Site Condition:


Soil Type: C(for seismic consideration as per NBC 105)
Seismic Zone Factor: 0.3
Safe Bearing Capacity: 150 KN/m2 (assumed)
2.4Material Specification:
Considering Architectural, Economic and strength demands reinforced cement concrete (RCC) is
used as the major structural material. The selected material also confirms the availability and ease in
construction. The concrete grade used is M25 as per NBC;1.5;2020 Specification. This material
provides minimum grade of structural concrete and favorable for easy production and quality control
as well.
Fe 500 is provided as longitudinal and shear reinforcing in Beams, Columns, foundations, and slabs
wherever RCC is used.

Considerations of material for loading and strength parameter are as detailed below:

Structural Components:
Concrete:
Grade: M25
Characteristic Compressive Strength: 25 N/mm2
Unit Weight: 25.0 KN/m3

Young’s Modulus of Elasticity (E): = 5000 fck N/mm2

≈ 22360680 KN/m2 (for M20)


Steel Reinforcement:
Grade: Fe 500 (for both longitudinal and shear reinforcement)

Non-Structural Components:
Brick wall:
Unit Weight: 18.85 KN/m3
Strength: Not Available

Finishing:

Page 4 of 32
Plaster:
Unit Weight: 20.4 KN/m3
Flooring: Screed + Punning
Unit Weight per meter: 1.1 KN/m2

2.5 Loading Details


Number of Storey 5 Storey
Loading in General Structural Self Weight
(Gravity loads) Live Load for residential services
Dead load of finishing materials for floor
Panel walls 250mm & 125mm thick brick walls without openings
125mm thick brick walls with 30% openings
Partition walls 125mm thick (half brick) walls with 30 & 20% openings
Parapet walls 125 mm thick (half brick) wall height 1m
Live Load As per IS 875 Part II
Lateral Loading As per NBC 105:1994

 The loads distributed over the area are imposed on area element and that distributed over length
are imposed on line element whenever possible.
 Where such facility is not feasible, equivalent conversion to different loading distribution is
carried to load the Model near the real case as far as possible.
 For lateral load, necessary calculations were performed and checked using NBC 105: 1994 for
response spectrum method.
 Different load combinations based on Nepal National Codes are developed and used for design
purposes.
Load Combinations:
The load combinations are based on NBC 105: 1994 Static Load
Combination:
1.2 DL + 1.5 LL
Seismic Load Combinations:
1.0 DL + 0.3 LL+0.6LLs EQx 1.0 DL + 0.3 LL+0.6LLs EQx
1.0DL + 0.3 LL+0.6LLs EQy 1.0 DL + 0.3 LL+0.6LLs EQx

Page 5 of 32
For seismic loading, mass equivalent to the load that composed of 100% of Dead load and 25% of
Live load is taken into consideration.
The Earthquake lateral loads were used in the combination from the Self-Generated Load on the
Seismic coefficient Method.
Modal analysis is carried out using FEM Based three dimensional analyses.

3.0 Design Approach and Methodology:


3.1 Introduction
The structure is analyzed for full Finite Element. Beams and columns modeled as frame (line)
elements with five and three internal stations. All floor slabs are modeled as Shell (Area) elements
with sufficient and appropriate meshing. Modulus of elasticity and Poisson’s ratio for used material
i.e. M25 grade concrete (as NBC) are taken accordingly and section properties used are based on
Preliminary section sizing with consideration for deflection, minimum size specified and
serviceability. Computation for stiffness as a whole is carried out using FEM based latest software.
Full Modal Analysis is carried out up to twelve modes confirming more than 95 % seismic mass
participation and it is applied for lateral seismic force distribution that generated with NBC 105
based Spectral Function for Soil Type-C.
For Section Design and Check, suitable Load combinations as suggested in NBC105:1994 and if not
covered in that, IS 1893- 2002 is referred with consideration of Envelopes of internal Forces
developed.
Foundation design is carried out to satisfy strength and stability requirements.

3.2 Software used: (Introduction to Analysis software)

The analysis for the structural system was carried out using Etabs 2020 ver 20 is a product of
computers and structures Inc, Berkeley. It is a FEM based software having facility of RC Design
based on IS456:2000

3.3 Structural Performance:


Structural response under limit state of serviceability is thoroughly checked. The force and stiffness
relationship resulting the deflection under various load cases and combined action of forces are duly
evaluated. Basically short-term elastic deflection due to vertical loads and lateral deflection due to

Page 6 of 32
seismic forces are of major importance along with the long-term deflection of beam elements under
sustained loading condition due to shrinkage and creep are also taken into account.

3.4 Deformation under Vertical Loads:


Maximum vertical deflection in all components that resulted under vertical load of combined effect
of self, imposed dead and live load are checked for every element and maintained to be within
permissible limit. Short-term elastic deflection and long-term deflection due to shrinkage and creep
due to sustained loads also are maintained within permissible limits for all the elements.

3.5 Deformation under Lateral Loads:


Effect of lateral load due to seismic force is analyzed using self-generated seismic load compatible
with Codal provision. The distribution of lateral force at different parts of the structure is done based
on the response under unit force. Using Complete Quadratic Combination (CQC) method of modal
combination combines the deformations, and related forces reported.

3.6 Recommendations:
The following recommendations are made:
• Materials used shall confirm minimum standard specified before use. Primarily the cement,
aggregate, sand and steel shall be used that confirms to NS or IS standard.
• Batching, mixing, placing and curing of concrete and steel fabrication and placing shall be done
as per standard practice.
• Construction safety shall be well planned and implemented.

4.0 Preliminary Design


The Preliminary Design was done using the prevailing thumb rules and span consideration.
Slab: The slab is designed based on IS456:2000. The slab is designed to meet the deflection criteria
for the slab.
Beam: The beam is designed based on IS456:2000. The slab is preliminary designed to meet the
deflection criteria as well as the moment requirements for the span.
Column: The column is preliminary designed to meet the stiffness criteria for the building.

Page 7 of 32
Staircase: The staircase is designed to satisfy the moment requirement as well as the deflection
criteria.

The sizes of the structural components are as given below:


Sizes of Structural Components:
Slab: 5” thick RCC (M25) Slab

Beam: Rectangular Beams size-” 10”X15” (BXD) (M25)

Column: Square size- 14” X 14” (HXB) (M25)

Staircase: Waist Slab thickness: 6.0” thick (M20)

5.0 Final Analysis


5.1 Load Calculations:
Refer Table: Load Intensity of Building Components
Live Load: 2.0 KN/m2 (for all rooms)
Live Load: 3.0 KN/m2 (for staircases and lobbies)
Roof Live Load: 1.5 KN/m2 (for roof accessible), 0.75 KN/m2 (for roof inaccessible)

5.2 Seismic Lump Load:


Seismic weight: Comprises Dead Load+ 25 of Live Load (as per IS Code for live load intensity ≤ 3
KN/m2)

Seismic wt. at ith floor level (WI) = (Total dead load of all components i.e. Beam, Slab, Columns
And Walls for ½ height above and ½ height below the floor level + 25% of live load)
n

Total Weight of the frame, W= Wi Where, n = total number of storey

Page 8 of 32
User Coefficient Auto Seismic Load Calculation

This calculation presents the automatically generated lateral seismic loads for load pattern EQX
using the user input coefficients, as calculated by ETABS. Direction and Eccentricity

Direction = X + Eccentricity Y
Eccentricity Ratio = 10% for all diaphragms
Factors and Coefficients

Equivalent Lateral Forces


Base Shear Coefficient, C C=0.125
Base Shear, V

Calculated Base Shear


Period Used W V
Direction C
(sec) (kN) (kN)
X + Ecc. Y 0 0.125 4611.5 576.43

Applied Story Forces

Page 9 of 32
Page 10 of 32
User Coefficient Auto Seismic Load Calculation

This calculation presents the automatically generated lateral seismic loads for load pattern EQY
using the user input coefficients, as calculated by ETABS. Direction and Eccentricity

Direction = Y + Eccentricity X
Eccentricity Ratio = 10% for all diaphragms
Factors and Coefficients

Equivalent Lateral Forces


Base Shear Coefficient, C C=0.125
Base Shear, V

Calculated Base Shear


Period Used W V
Direction C
(sec) (kN) (kN)
Y + Ecc. X 0 0.125 4611.5 576.43

Applied Story Forces


5.3 Load Cases:
Dead : Self Weight of the building structural components (Beams, columns and slabs) Finish :
Weight of the finishing of the slabs as well as staircases (including steps).
Wall : Wall loads (inclusive of plaster)
Live : Live load in the building area elements.
Rlive : Live load in the terraces both accessible and inaccessible (not including in seismic
behaviour)
QX : Spectral Seismic Load in X – Direction
QY : Spectral Seismic Load in Y – Direction

5.4 Load Combination:


DL = 1.5Dead + 1.5Finish + 1.5 Wall + 1.5 Rlive + 1.5Live
1.0 DL + 0.3 LL+0.6LLs EQx
1.0 DL + 0.3 LL+0.6LLs EQx
1.0DL + 0.3 LL+0.6LLs EQy
1.0 DL + 0.3 LL+0.6LLs EQx

Page 12 of 32
6.0 Design of Structural Members
6.1 Design Assumptions:
Foundation
The Safe Bearing Capacity (SBC) of the soil is taken to be 125 KN/m 2. The depth of the
foundation is taken as 1.67m. It is assumed that the soil below is converted to a firm base by
sufficient compaction through any convenient means or as directed by the site engineer.

Beam:
The beams are assumed to be rectangular. The preliminary design of the beam is carried out
considering the deflection criteria as well as the loading condition.

Slab:
The longest span slab is designed and for uniformity in construction, all the slabs are detailed
according to the designed slab. The slab is designed based on IS 456:2000, for adjacent edge
discontinuous. However during detailing, the torsion in the free edges is considered.

Design Methodology:
The design of beams and columns that are the structural components in the building are carried
out using the results and analysis for critical responses and also checking with manual
calculations is carried out. The design of the foundation is carried out based on the base reactions
as obtained from the software with necessary adjustments. The design of slabs and staircases are
carried out based on the prevailing design practices, following the codal provisions.

6.2 Calculation of Wall Loads.

Page 13 of 32
The calculations of the loads are given in the following tables:

Load Intensity of Wall

7.0 ANALYSIS OUTPUT


Result from Structural models and analysis

3D Model of the Building


Page 14 of 32
JOINT REACTIONS

Page 15 of 32
Design Plan (Ground Floor)

Page 16 of 32
Page 17 of 32
Shear Force Diagram (Sample only)

Page 18 of 32
Axial Force Diagram (Sample only)

Bending Moment Diagram (Sample only)

Page 19 of 32
8.0 Design of Members
Design of Beams and Columns

The design of beams and columns are done from the software itself. However, it is to be notified
that the limitations of the design by the software have been evaluated and the adjustments have
been made accordingly. The samples (summary) of the design through the software based on
IS456: 2000 has been presented hereunder.

Page 20 of 32
Output for the Reinforcement Area (Beams and Columns)

Grid -A

Page 21 of 32
Grid -B

Page 22 of 32
Grid –C

Page 23 of 32
Story- 1st

Page 24 of 32
Story- 2nd

Page 25 of 32
Story- 3rd

Page 26 of 32
Story- 4th

Page 27 of 32
Story- 5th

ETABS Concrete Frame Design


IS 456:2000 + IS 13920:2016 Column Section Design (Summary)

Page 28 of 32
Column Element Details
Level Element Unique Name Section ID Combo ID Station Loc Length (mm) LLRF Type
Story1 C7 2 C-14"x14" DL+0.3LL+0.6LLs+EQx 0 3175 1 Ductile Frame

Section Properties
b (mm) h (mm) dc (mm) Cover (Torsion) (mm)
355.6 355.6 58 30

Material Properties
Ec (MPa) fck (MPa) Lt.Wt Factor (Unitless) fy (MPa) fys (MPa)
25000 25 1 413.69 413.69

Design Code Parameters


ɣC ɣS
1.5 1.15

Axial Force and Biaxial Moment Design For Pu , Mu2 , Mu3


Design Pu Design Mu2 Design Mu3 Minimum M2 Minimum M3 Rebar Area Rebar %
kN kN-m kN-m kN-m kN-m mm² %
182.0172 16.242 115.0782 3.6403 3.6403 2284 1.81

Axial Force and Biaxial Moment Factors


K Factor Length Initial Moment Additional Moment Minimum Moment
Unitless mm kN-m kN-m kN-m
Major Bend(M3) 0.649601 2794 56.1951 0 3.6403
Minor Bend(M2) 0.656466 2794 6.4968 0 3.6403

Shear Design for Vu2 , Vu3


Shear Vu Shear Vc Shear Vs Shear Vp Rebar Asv /s
kN kN kN kN mm²/m
Major, Vu2 52.6871 81.7817 42.3301 36.5373 395.41
Minor, Vu3 48.2361 82.885 42.3301 48.2361 395.41

Joint Shear Check/Design


Joint Shear Shear Shear Shear Joint Shear
Force kN VTop kN Vu,Tot kN Vc Area Ratio
kN cm² Unitless
Major Shear, Vu2 N/N N/N N/N N/N N/N N/N
Minor Shear, Vu3 N/N N/N N/N N/N N/N N/N

(1.4) Beam/Column Capacity Ratio


Major Ratio Minor Ratio
N/N N/N

Page 29 of 32
Additional Moment Reduction Factor k (IS 39.7.1.1)
Ag Asc Puz kN Pb Pu k
cm² cm² kN kN Unitless
1264.5 22.8 2131.1685 688.4552 182.0172 1

Additional Moment (IS 39.7.1)


Consider Length Section KL/Depth KL/Depth KL/Depth Ma
Ma Factor Depth (mm) Ratio Limit Exceeded Moment (kN-m)
Major Bending (M3 ) Yes 0.88 355.6 5.104 12 No 0
Minor Bending (M2 ) Yes 0.88 355.6 5.158 12 No 0

Notes:
N/A: Not Applicable
N/C: Not Calculated
N/N: Not Needed

ETABS Concrete Frame Design


IS 456:2000 + IS 13920:2016 Beam Section Design (Summary)

Beam Element Details


Level Element Unique Name Section ID Combo ID Station Loc Length (mm) LLRF Type
Story1 B2 40 B-12"X15" DL+0.3LL+0.6LLs-EQx 177.8 3556 1 Ductile Frame

Section Properties
b (mm) h (mm) bf (mm) ds (mm) dct (mm) dcb (mm)
304.8 381 304.8 0 41 41

Material Properties
Ec (MPa) fck (MPa) Lt.Wt Factor (Unitless) fy (MPa) fys (MPa)
25000 25 1 413.69 413.69

Design Code Parameters


ɣC ɣS

Page 30 of 32
1.5 1.15

Factored Forces and Moments


Factored Factored Factored Factored
Mu3 Tu Vu2 Pu
kN-m kN-m kN kN
-71.736 3.2163 62.622 0

Design Moments, Mu3 & Mt


Factored Factored Positive Negative
Moment Mt Moment Moment
kN-m kN-m kN-m kN-m
-71.736 4.2569 0 -75.993

Design Moment and Flexural Reinforcement for Moment, Mu3 & Tu


Design Design -Moment +Moment Minimum Required
-Moment +Moment Rebar Rebar Rebar Rebar
kN-m kN-m mm² mm² mm² mm²
Top (+2 Axis) -75.993 701 0 701 301

Bottom (-2 Axis) 0 350 0 0 350

Shear Force and Reinforcement for Shear, Vu2 & Tu


Shear Ve Shear Vc Shear Vs Shear Vp Rebar Asv /s
kN kN kN kN mm²/m
83.7008 0 100.5845 56.296 822.39

Torsion Force and Torsion Reinforcement for Torsion, Tu & VU2


Tu Vu Core b1 Core d1 Rebar Asvt /s
kN-m kN mm mm mm²/m
3.2163 62.622 242.8 319 333.72

Page 31 of 32
SLAB DESIGN

Claculation of effective depth

Slab ID: A1:A2:B2:B1

c/c distance of shorter length (lx)= 3.556 m


c/c distance of longer length (ly)= 4.369 m
Width of Support= 0.25 m
IS 456:2000 Clause 24.1
32
d= lx/32
= 3.556/32
= 111.125 ≈ 125mm
Adopt diameter of main bar(Φ)= 8mm Clear cover= 15mm
Adopt diameter of distribution bar(Φ)= 8mm
Dia. of reinforcing bars is choosen in such a way that it shall not exceed 1/8th of the total thickness of slab
1/8th of total thickness of slab= 19mm IS 456:2000 Clause 26.5.2.2
Overall depth (D)= 111.125+(8/2) +15
= 130.125 ≈ 150mm
Provide Slab thickness of 150mm.

Calculation of effective length

Along shorter length c/c


distace= 3.556 m
clear span+eff. Depth(dx)= 3.302+(125/1000)
= 3.427 m lex= minimum of
3.556 and 3.427
= 3.427 m
Along longer length c/c
distace= 4.369 m
clear span+eff. Depth(dy)= 4.115+[(125/1000)-8]
= 4.240 m ley= minimum of
4.369 and 4.24 = 4.240 m

25 N/mm²
500 N/mm²
ley/lex= 4.24/3.427
= 1.237 if ley/lex < 2, then it is two way slab
Slab Type= Two Way Slab otherwise one way slab
Load Claculation
Compressive Strength of Concrete (fck)=
Minimum Yield Strength of Steel (fy)=
Unit weight of concrete (γ)= 25 KN/m³ IS: 875 (Part 1)-1987,Table-1 Item no. 22
(For 1m width of slab)
Live Load (LL)= 3 KN/m²
= [3KN/m2*(1m*length)]/length
= 3 KN/m
Floor Finish (FF)= 1.5 KN/m
Partition wall= 2 KN/m
Self weight= γ*D
= 25*150
= 3.75 KN/m
Total Load= 10.25 KN/m
Factored Load= 1.5*10.25
= 15.375 KN/m
Maximum bending moment calculation
Type of Panel= Two Adjacent Edges Discontinuous

ley/lex αx-ve ley/lex αx+ve


The value of ley/lex and α is taken 1.2 0.06 1.2 0.045
1.237 -ve 1.237 +ve
αx αx
from IS 456:2000 Table-26 -ve 1.3 0.065 1.3 0.049

αx =y1 + [{(y2-y1)/(x2-x1)}*(x-x1)] = 0.06+[{(0.065-0.06)/(1.3-1.2)}*(1.237-1.2)]


-ve
αx = 0.0619 +ve

αx = 0.045+[{(0.049-0.045)/(1.3-1.2)}*(1.237-1.2)]
= 0.0465

For Two Adjacent Edges Discontinuous the value of αy-ve and αy+ve
is taken from IS 456:2000 Table-26
αy-ve= 0.047
αy+ve= 0.035
Mx-ve = αx-ve * W * lx2 = 0.0619*15.375*3.427^2 = 11.170 KN-m
+ve +ve 2
Mx = αx * W * lx = 0.0465*15.375*3.427^2 = 8.394 KN-m
My-ve = αy-ve * W * lx2 = 0.047*15.375*3.427^2 = 8.487 KN-m
+ve +ve 2
My = αy * W * lx = 0.035*15.375*3.427^2 = 6.320 KN-m
Check for depth against bending

Mmax= 0.133*fck*b*dreq^2
11.17 *10^6= 0.133*25*1000*dreq^2
dreq=< effective depth provided 57.960 mm ( 125mm.) OK
Area of Steel Calculation

)
Mx-ve = 0.87*fy*Astx-ve*dx*[1-{(Astx-ve*fy)/(b*dx*fck)}]
11.17*10^6= 0.87*500*(Ast)x+ve*125*[1-{(Astx+ve*500)/(1000*125*25)}]
Astx-ve = 212.657 mm² Similarly,
Astx+ve = 158.388 mm²
Asty-ve = 160.183 mm²
Asty+ve = 118.474 mm²
(Ast)min= 0.12% of bD

= 180 mm² 236.36891 mm²


Taking maximum area between Ast and (Ast)min for spacing calculation

(Spacing)x-ve= 1000/[212.657/{(3.1415*8^2)/4}] = 236.369 mm ≈ 235mm


(Spacing)x+ve= 1000/[180/{(3.1415*8^2)/4}] = 279.253 mm ≈ 275mm
(Spacing)y-ve= 1000/[180/{(3.1415*8^2)/4}] = 279.253 mm ≈ 275mm
(Spacing)y+ve= 1000/[180/{(3.1415*8^2)/4}] = 279.253 mm ≈ 275mm
Maximum Spacing of main bar Maximum Spacing of distribution bar
(i) 3d (i) 5d
= 3*125 = 5*125
= 375 mm = 625 mm
(ii) 300mm (ii) 450 mm
minimum of (i) & (ii) = 375 mm minimum of (i) & (ii) = 450 mm
Maximum allowable spacing for main bar= 235 mm
Maximum allowable spacing for distribution bar= 275 mm
Provide 8mm dia. bar @ dia. bar @150mm c/c at support of X-axis
Provide 8mm dia. bar @ dia. bar @150mm c/c at mid-span of X-axis
Provide 8mm dia. bar @ dia. bar @150mm c/c at mid-span of Y-axis
Provide 8mm dia. bar @ dia. bar @150mm c/c at mid-span of Y-axis
(Ast)x+ provided = {1000*(3.1415*64)/4}/150 % =335.103 mm²
steel provided= Area provided/(b*D)
= (335.103*100)/(1000*150) =0.223%

Check for shear force

Vmax= τ=
= (15.375*3.427)/2 = (26.345*10^3)/(1000*125)
= 26.345 KN = 0.211 N/mm²
0.268
For M25 concrete and (As*100)/bd) value

0.341
(τc)=value calculated from IS456:200 Table-19 k= 1.30
K*τc= 1.3*0.341 for solid slab (IS 456:2000 Clause 40.2.1) Design Shear
strength= 0.44 N/mm²

0.28 N/mm²
Design shear strength of concrete (τc)min=IS456:200 Table-19
2.80 N/mm²
Maximum shear stress (τc)max=IS456:200 Table-20

τ<(τc)min τ < kτc < (τc)max OK


OK
Check for deflection
Basic values
Basic value: α=IS 456:2000 Clause 23 23.2.1 (a)
Modification factor
(β) =IS 456:2000 Clause 23.2.1 (b) 1
For Tension Reinforcement (γ) =IS 2 456:2000 Clause 23.2.1 ( c) fig 4
For Compression Reinforcement (δ) 1 =IS 456:2000 Clause 23.2.1 (d) fig 5
Reduction factor for flanged beam (λ) 1 =IS 456:2000 Clause 23.2.1 (e) fig 6
For Calculating the the factor γ
0.58fy
Steel Stress of service load (fs)=
= 0.58*500*[(Ast.req.)/(Ast.provided)]
= 137.070 Now,
αβγδλ= 23*1*2*1*1
= 46
l/d= 3.556/(125/1000)
= 28.45
(l/d)<αβγδλ OK
Stair Cae Design
DATA
3.556m
159mm
254mm
150mm
20mm
124mm
25MPA
500MPA
Effective Span (l)
Riser (R)
Tread (T)
Waist Slab thickness (t)
Clear Cover
Effective Depth of waist slab(d)
Grade of Concrete(fck)
Grade of Steel (fy)
Calculation of load
On waist slab On landing
Selt wt. of waist slab 4.424 kn/m^2 Selt wt. Self wt. of landing 3.75 kn/m^2
of steps 2 kn/m^2 live loads 3 kn/m^2 Live load 3 kn/m^2
Finishing load 0.6 kn/m^2 Finishing load 0.6 kn/m^2
Total load 10.024 kn/m^2 Total load 7.35 kn/m^2
Factored Load 15.036 kn/m^2 Factored load 11.025 kn/m^2

Reaction Calculation
Ra 22.818 kn/m Bending Moment Calculaiton
Rb 25.965 kn/m Max. BM 22.418 kn-m/m

Main Bar Area Required


Ast (required) 447 mm^2/m Distribution Bar
Provide 12mm dia @ 150mm c/c Ast(required) 180mm^2/m
Provide 10 mm dia @ 200 mm c/c
List of design code and Standards

1. NBC-000-114:1994 : All relevant design codes in Nepal

2. IS 456 – 2000 : Code for practice for plain & Reinforced concrete

3. IS 875 – 1987 : Code of practice for Design Loads (other than


earthquake load) for building & structures.

4. IS 1893(part-I)-2002 : Code of practice for earthquake resist design of


Structures.

5. IS 13920 – 1993 : Code of practice for Ductile detailing of Reinforced


Concrete structures subjected to seismic forces.

6. SP: 16 – 1980 : Design aids for Reinforced concrete to IS 456 -


1978

7. ETABS 2016 V 16.2.1 : Proprietary program of Research Engineers.


Page 35 of 35

You might also like