Chapter 1 and 2... Real One
Chapter 1 and 2... Real One
Introduction:
The field of organizational behaviour plays a crucial role in guiding organizations through
unprecedented change.
Organizations face challenges such as global competition, technological disruption, and
shifts in employment relationships.
In this section, we explore four key emerging workplace developments: diversity and
inclusive workplaces, work-life integration, remote work, and evolving employment
relationships.
Work-Life Integration:
Work-life integration replaces the idea of work-life balance, recognizing the inherent
integration of different life roles.
People have multiple roles, and success in one role can enhance success in others.
Work-life conflict occurs when one role depletes personal resources needed for other
roles.
Strategies for work-life integration include integrating roles, flexible scheduling,
alignment with personal characteristics, and boundary management.
Organizations may support integration by promoting performance-based evaluation and
regular communication.
Remote Work:
Remote work, or telecommuting, has become more common, especially with the advent
of technology.
The percentage of remote workers varies, with a significant increase during the COVID-
19 pandemic.
Remote work offers benefits like better work-life integration, cost savings, and reduced
environmental impact.
Challenges include social isolation, weaker team cohesion, and potential negative effects
on organizational culture.
The success of remote work depends on individual characteristics, job requirements,
and organizational support.
Introduction
The MARS model stands for Motivation, Ability, Role Perceptions, and Situational
Factors.
These four variables are critical influences on an individual's voluntary behavior and
performance.
A deficiency in any of these elements can negatively affect performance.
1. Employee Motivation
Motivation is the driving force within an individual that impacts the direction, intensity,
and persistence of effort for voluntary behavior.
Direction involves goal setting and the choices people make regarding what to achieve
and at what quality or quantity.
Intensity is the amount of effort an individual invests in a task.
Persistence refers to the length of time an individual continues to exert effort to achieve
a goal.
Motivation is a cognitive and emotional force within individuals that drives them to act.
2. Ability
3. Role Perceptions
Role perceptions refer to how clearly individuals understand their job expectations,
including duties, task priorities, and preferred behaviors.
Role clarity involves understanding specific duties, task priorities, and preferred
behaviors.
Role ambiguity exists when employees know multiple ways to perform a task but
misunderstand which one the organization prefers.
Role clarity is crucial for efficient and accurate task performance, coordination with co-
workers, and employee motivation.
4. Situational Factors
The MARS model demonstrates how these four factors, motivation, ability, role perceptions,
and situational factors, directly impact an individual's behavior and performance in the
workplace. Understanding these elements can help organizations optimize employee
performance and achieve desired outcomes.
Introduction
The MARS model emphasizes that motivation, ability, role perceptions, and situational
factors impact all voluntary workplace behaviors and performance.
Various types of individual behaviors can be categorized into five key groups: task
performance, organizational citizenship behaviors (OCBs), counterproductive work
behaviors (CWBs), joining and staying with the organization, and maintaining work
attendance.
1. Task Performance
OCBs extend beyond specific tasks and include various forms of cooperation and
helpfulness, supporting the organization's social and psychological context.
OCBs can be directed towards individuals and the organization.
Individual-directed OCBs involve assisting co-workers, adjusting work schedules,
showing courtesy, and sharing resources.
Organization-directed OCBs encompass supporting the organization's image, offering
ideas, attending events, and staying informed about organizational developments.
OCBs can be discretionary or mandatory, impacting individual, team, and organizational
effectiveness.
CWBs encompass voluntary behaviors that can potentially harm the organization or its
stakeholders.
CWBs include various intentional and unintentional actions like harassment, conflict
creation, deviating from work methods, theft, sabotage, and resource wastage.
These behaviors have the potential to undermine organizational effectiveness.
4. Joining and Staying with the Organization
Attracting and retaining employees with the right skills is crucial for an organization's
success.
Staff shortages can limit a company's growth during economic booms and cause
significant challenges during crises.
Employee turnover can result in the loss of valuable knowledge, skills, and relationships,
affecting organizational effectiveness negatively.
These types of individual behavior in the workplace play a critical role in shaping organizational
performance and effectiveness. Understanding and managing them can help organizations
achieve their objectives and maintain a healthy work environment.
Introduction
People do not exhibit the same behavior in all situations; they adapt to varying
contexts.
Situational factors, social norms, and external conditions influence behavior.
Despite situational adaptation, personality differences remain apparent, as
individuals maintain their unique traits.
The Five-Factor Model (or Big Five) is the most widely recognized and researched
framework for organizing personality traits.
It includes five dimensions:
1. Conscientiousness: Organized, dependable, goal-focused, and disciplined.
2. Agreeableness: Trusting, helpful, good-natured, and considerate.
3. Neuroticism (Emotional Stability): Anxious, self-conscious, or calm and
poised.
4. Openness to Experience: Imaginative, creative, and curious.
5. Extraversion: Outgoing, energetic, sociable, or quiet and introverted.
These dimensions represent clusters of specific traits and are fairly consistent
across cultures.
Personality is not static; it can change over time due to various factors.
The Big Five does not encompass all aspects of personality; other models
emphasize different components.
Specific traits within each factor can sometimes be better predictors of behavior
and performance.
Other Personality Concepts: The Dark Triad and MBTI Types Learning Objective 2
(LO2)
In the process of developing the Five-Factor Model (Big Five), certain personality
traits with explicitly positive or negative valences were deliberately excluded.
Some excluded traits, like impulsiveness, were recognized in earlier personality
models.
Subsequent research focused on traits with positive and negative valences,
leading to the identification of the "dark triad."
The dark triad comprises three socially undesirable personality traits:
Machiavellianism, narcissism, and psychopathy.
These traits collectively exhibit a "dark core" characterized by low
humility/honesty or malevolent behavior to achieve personal gains.
Machiavellianism
Narcissism
Psychopathy
The dark triad traits are increasingly relevant in the workplace, as they are not
confined to criminology or politics.
Dishonesty and malevolent behavior are core characteristics, leading to a lack of
trust and a focus on personal goals at the expense of team goals.
People with dark triad traits may be perceived as functional team members in the
short run when it serves their self-interest.
However, they are associated with serious white-collar crimes, workplace
aggression, and poor decision-making, including excessive risk-taking.
The dark triad predicts counterproductive work behaviors, but it is not as reliable
as specific Big Five traits like low agreeableness and low conscientiousness.
Personality tests, especially the Big Five, have demonstrated associations with
various workplace behaviors and outcomes.
The Five-Factor Model can predict job performance, organizational citizenship,
leadership, counterproductive behaviors, and other important outcomes.
Critics argue that other predictors, such as work samples and past performance,
may be more reliable for selection decisions.
The assumption that extreme personality traits are better for job performance is
challenged because too much conscientiousness can lead to perfectionism.
Concerns about potential discrimination, faking answers, and a lack of knowledge
regarding which traits organizations seek in applicants are also raised.
The debate continues about the effectiveness and fairness of using personality
tests in the selection process.
Understanding the dark triad and the MBTI provides insights into the complexities of
personality and its application in organizational settings. These concepts offer additional
perspectives for assessing and understanding individual differences in the workplace.
Introduction
Values play a crucial role in job selection and daily decision-making.
Values are stable, evaluative beliefs guiding our preferences for outcomes and
actions.
They serve as moral compasses, influencing motivation, decisions, and behaviors
and providing justifications for actions.
Many individuals consider personal values when choosing where to work and
making daily job-related decisions.
Aligning personal values with an organization's values enhances job satisfaction
and effectiveness.
Hierarchy of Values
Values and personality traits are related but differ in key ways.
Values are evaluative and tell us what we ought to do, while personality traits are
descriptive, indicating what we naturally tend to do.
Personality traits have minimal conflict with each other, while some values
oppose others.
Personality traits and values have varying degrees of influence from heredity and
socialization.
Types of Values
Values Awareness
The connection between personal values and individual behavior is not always
strong.
The situation, counter-motivational forces, and lack of active consideration can
lead to values-behavior inconsistency.
Values become more influential when individuals are explicitly reminded of them
and see their relevance to the situation.
Values Congruence
Conclusion
Introduction
Ethical values play a pivotal role in the workplace, shaping decision-making and
leadership.
Ethics refers to the study of moral principles or values that determine the
rightness or wrongness of actions and the goodness or badness of outcomes.
Most ethical issues revolve around four primary ethical principles: utilitarianism,
individual rights, distributive justice, and the ethic of care.
Decision-makers must consider these principles to address ethical implications in
their decisions.
Utilitarianism
This principle asserts that the moral obligation is to seek the greatest good for
the greatest number.
It emphasizes outcomes and satisfaction but can be limited by challenges in
measuring outcomes and ethical concerns about means.
Individual Rights
This principle ensures that everyone possesses the same natural and moral rights,
including freedom of speech, security, and fair trial.
Some individual rights may conflict with others, creating ethical dilemmas.
Distributive Justice
This principle emphasizes that similar individuals should receive similar benefits
and burdens.
Difficulties arise in determining who is "similar" and the relevant factors, a subject
further explored in Chapter 5.
Ethic of Care
This principle dictates that individuals have an ethical duty to help others grow
and self-actualize.
It promotes empathy, attentiveness, and responsiveness to the needs of others.
Moral Intensity
Moral intensity is the extent to which an issue demands the application of ethical
principles.
It hinges on the seriousness of the impact, the probability of outcomes, and the
number of people affected.
Moral Sensitivity
Situational Factors
Situational influences such as pressure from top management can impact ethical
behavior.
Pressure should not justify unethical actions, but awareness of such influences is
crucial.
Alcoa's Ethical Standard in Russia
Conclusion
Introduction
Values not only vary among individuals and organizations but also across entire
societies.
Five cross-cultural values are of significance: individualism, collectivism, power
distance, uncertainty avoidance, and achievement-nurturing orientation.
Cross-Cultural Values
1. Individualism
High: Canada, United States, Chile, South Africa
Medium: Japan, Denmark
Low: Taiwan, Venezuela
Emphasizes personal uniqueness, freedom, and self-sufficiency; values
personal goals and individuality.
2. Collectivism
High: Israel, Taiwan
Medium: India, Denmark
Low: Canada, United States, Germany, Japan
Emphasizes group membership, harmony, and in-group norms; prioritizes
in-group well-being.
3. Power Distance
High: India, Malaysia
Medium: Canada, United States, Japan
Low: Denmark, Israel
Accepts unequal power distribution; views authority as unquestionable
(high power distance) or promotes shared power (low power distance).
4. Uncertainty Avoidance
High: Belgium, Greece
Medium: Canada, United States, Norway
Low: Denmark, Singapore
Tolerance for ambiguity and ambiguity avoidance vary.
5. Achievement-Nurturing Orientation
High: Austria, Japan
Medium: Canada, United States, Brazil
Low: Sweden, Netherlands
Emphasis on competition, materialism, and personal success (achievement
orientation) or relationships and well-being (nurturing orientation).
Power Distance
Uncertainty Avoidance
Canada is culturally diverse, not only in terms of multiculturalism but also deep-
level cultural differences.
Various communities within Canada, such as Indigenous communities, have
unique cultural values.
Indigenous Canadians often value collectivism, low power distance, non-
interference, and natural time orientation.
Regional differences in personal values and personality traits exist within Canada,
influenced by regional institutions and migration patterns.
Canadians and Americans share similarities but have differences in key values.
Canadians tend to be more tolerant and morally permissive, accept collective
rights, and are less associated with religious institutions.
They also believe in shared leadership within organizations.
A significant difference is their beliefs regarding patriarchal authority, with
Canadians holding more progressive views compared to Americans.
Conclusion