Scribd
Upload
48 views13 pages

One Way & Two Way

Here are some examples and solutions of ANOVA both one way and two way. Good for practice.

Uploaded by

Atia Ibnat
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
48 views13 pages

One Way & Two Way

Here are some examples and solutions of ANOVA both one way and two way. Good for practice.

Uploaded by

Atia Ibnat
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 13
11.75 — 10.43 |e] = 1.215 ‘The critical value for t for a two tailed test at 5% level of significance with 8+7— 13 degrees of freedom is 1.71. Calculated vate =1.215 and —Tabullated value =1.771 [Calculated value | Fyos(4,12). Hence Hp, is accepted. That is the 5 workers differ respect to mean productivity. 2. Fy > Fags(3,12). Hence py Is rejected. That is the mean productivity is not the same for the four machines. Example: 40 A.company appoints 4 salesmen’s A,B, C and D and observes their sales in 3 seasons: summer, winter and monsoon. The figures (in lakhs of Rs.) are given in the following table: Salesmen| Season aA; B]c]o ‘Summer 4s | 40 | 38 | 37 Winter 43 [41 | 45 | 38 ‘Monsoon 39 | 39 | 41 | a1 Carry out an analysis of variance, Solution: Let us take the null hypothesis that there is no significant difference between the sales in the three seasons and also between the sales of the 4 salesmen. To simplify calculation let us subtract 40 from each value, the new values are 39 Salesmen ‘Season A] BC] D | Total Summer s[o]-2/3] 0 Winter 3fafs/2i 7 Monsoon ayavafaf oo Total 7/o;4a|/a| 7 Correction factor = C.F £ e. 4.083 SST = Total sum of squares = > ya we = (65)? + (0)? + 2)? + 3)? + 8)? +? + 5)? + 2)?-+ 1)? + (-D? + (DF + (I = 4.083 6.917 Between seasons sum of squares @? (7 @? Raat 7 4083 = 8.167 Between salesmen sum of squares 2 2 (42 (4)? @? 0)? | (4) + » 4.083 Ry 2.917 3 Error sum of squares Ry = SST ~ R, — Ry = 76.917 ~ 22.917 — 8.167 = 45.833 ANOVA table for two-way classification ‘Source of | Degrees of | Sum of squares | Mean sum of squares variation | freedom (ss) (ms) Eh a Seasons | 3-1=2 8.167 4.0835 Fy 40 Salesmen | 4-1=3 22.917 7.639 Fy 7.639 Eror | 3#2=6 45.833 7.639 Total 11 76.917 Foo5(6,2) = 19.3 and — Fogs(3,6) = 4.76 Conclusion: LF, < Fyos(6,2). Hence we accept the null hypothesis. That is there is no difference between the sales in the seasons. 2. Fy < Fogs(3,6). Hence we accept the null hypothesis, That is there is no difference between in the sales of the 4 salesmen. Example: 41 Four different, though supposedly equivalent forms of a standardized reading achievement test were given to each of 5 students, and the following are the scores which they obtained, Machine Type A B c D i 44 38 a7 36 2 46 40 52 43 Workers 3 34 36 44 32 4 43 38 46 33 5 38 42 49 29 1. Test whether the five men differ with respect to mean productivity and 2, Test whether the mean productivity is the same for the four different machine types. Solution: Let us take the null hypothesis that 1. The 5 workers do not differ with respect to mean productivity be, Hos # Ha = Ha = Ha = ta = Hs 2. The mean productivity is the same for the four different machines. fey Hoe * Ha = He = Ms = Be 41 To simplify calculation let us subtract 40 from each value, the new values are Machine Type A BC D Total 1 4 2 °7 4 5 2 6 0 @ 3 2 Workers 3 6 4 4 38 -14 4 32 «6 7 ° 5 2 2 9 a 8 Total 5 6 38 20 Correct tor = C.F = = CO 9g ‘orrection factor = C.F = 37 =~F)- = SST = Total sum of squares = yy -CF a7 = (A? + (2) + (1) + 4)? + ©? + (0)? + (12)? + 3)? + (6)? + (-4)* +4) + (8)? + B+ C2)? + 6)? + (7? +2)? +? + (9) +(-1') = 20 = 574 Between workers sum of squares, (5)? , (21)? , (-14)? , (0)? , (8)? _ on = ata te qt q 7 20 = 1815-20 = 1615 1 Between machines sum of squares GS) 6)? , (38)? (17)? 55 5 5 R, = 20 = 358.8 — 20 = 338.8 Error sum of squares Ry = SST — Ry — Ry = 574 - 1615 — 338.8 = 73.7 42 ANOVA table for two-way dassification Sours of Desrees of ‘sum ofsauares ‘Mean sumer sauares | Variance Raton (F-Ratio) Workers | 5-1=4 161.5 “= P= eis = 6576 Machines] 4-1=3 | 3388 sae = 11293 Error | 4*3=12 73.7 Total 19 574 Foos(412) = 3.26 and Foos(3,12) = 3.49 Conclusion: 3. F, > Foos(4,12). Hence Ho; is accepted. That is the 5 workers differ respect to mean productivity. 4, Fy > Fygs(3,12). Hence Ho, Is rejected. That is the mean productivity is not the same for the four machines. LATIN SQUARE DESIGN (LSD) OR THREE WAY CLASSIFICATION Example: 45 ‘Set up the analysis of variance for the following results of a Latin Square Design, Use 0.01 level of significance, a € B D 12 19 10 8 c B D A 18 12 6 7 B D a € 22 10 5 2a D a c 8 12 7 7 7 43

You might also like